Ushering in the 2019 Pre-K to Grade 12 Gifted Programming Standards

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-140
Author(s):  
Alicia Cotabish ◽  
Debbie Dailey ◽  
Susan Corwith ◽  
Susan Johnsen ◽  
Chin-Wen Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Gifted Education ◽  
Research Evidence ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Revision Process ◽  
Gifted Programming ◽  
New Research

This column presents the 2019 NAGC Pre-K to Grade 12 Gifted Programming Standards and its applications to the field of gifted education. It describes the revision process and the differences between the 2010 NAGC Programming Standards and this revision. These differences include the incorporation of new research, evidence, and best practices; alignments with other national professional standards; and an emphasis on shared terminology across various fields, simplified language, and streamlined outcomes and evidence-based practices.

Book Review: Jolly, J.L., & Jarvis, J.M. (Eds). (2018). Exploring Gifted Education: Australian and New Zealand Perspectives. Melbourne, Australia: Routledge.

2020 ◽  
pp. 54-59
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Gifted Education ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Central Thesis ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Areas Of Concern

In this first edition book, editors Jolly and Jarvis have compiled a range of important, contemporary gifted education topics. Key areas of concern focus on evidence-based practices and research findings from Australia and New Zealand. Other contributors include 14 gifted education experts from leading Australian and New Zealand Universities and organisations. Exploring Gifted Education: Australian and New Zealand Perspectives, introduced by the editors, is well organised. Jolly and Jarvis’s central thesis in their introduction is to acknowledge the disparity between policy, funding and practice in Australia and New Zealand. Specifically, in relation to Australia, they note that a coordinated, national research agenda is absent, despite recommendations published by the Australian Senate Inquiry almost 20 years ago.

scholarly journals Sustainability reporting challenges in developing countries: towards management perceptions research evidence-based practices

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Venancio Tauringana
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Research Evidence ◽  
Sustainability Reporting ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Global Reporting Initiative ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Awareness Campaigns ◽  
The Impact

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is threefold. First, it aims to identify managerial perceptions-based research determinants of sustainability reporting. Second, it sets out to evaluate the impact of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) efforts in increasing SR in developing countries. Third, the researcher argues for the adoption of management perceptions research evidence-based practices (EBP) to address SR challenges in developing countries.Design/methodology/approachThe study was undertaken using a desk-based review of management perceptions-based research literature on the determinants of SR. The impact of GRI efforts in increasing adoption of SR was undertaken through both desk-based research and descriptive analysis of data obtained from the GRI database from 2014 to 2019 relating to 107 developing countries. The call for the adoption of management perceptions research EBP is based on a critical analysis of both the management perceptions of the determinants of SR research and evaluation the impact of GRI efforts to increase SR in developing countries.FindingsTraining, legislation, issuing of guidance, stakeholder pressure, awareness campaigns, market and public pressure were identified as some of the determinants of SR. The evaluation of the impact of GRI efforts shows they had limited impact on increasing SR in developing countries. Research needed to adopt management perceptions research EBP is identified.Research limitations/implicationsThis study is conceptual. Management perceptions-based research is needed in more developing countries to better understand the determinants of SR and identify the most effective policies or practices to address related challenges.Originality/valueThe findings contribute to the calls to make academic research more relevant to policy formulation. In particular, the proposal for research needed to inform EBP adoption to address SR challenges in developing countries is new.

scholarly journals Group Supervision Attitudes: Supervisory Practices Fostering Resistance to Adoption of Evidence-Based Practices

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Brooks ◽  
David Patterson ◽  
Patrick McKiernan
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Clinical Supervision ◽  
Group Supervision ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Negative Attitudes ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Potential Barriers ◽  
Utilization Of Technology ◽  
Supervisory Practices

The focus of this study was to qualitatively evaluate worker’s attitudes about clinical supervision. It is believed that poor attitudes toward clinical supervision can create barriers during supervision sessions. Fifty-one participants within a social services organization completed an open-ended questionnaire regarding their clinical supervision experiences. Results suggest four key areas which appear to be strong factors in workers’ experiences and attitudes regarding group supervision: a. facilitator’s skill level; b. creativity; c. utilization of technology; and d. applicability. For organizations interested in overcoming potential barriers to adopting best practices, effectively addressing workers’ negative attitudes toward group supervision would be a worthy endeavor.

scholarly journals Program Practices Predict Intergenerational Interaction among Youth and Older Adults

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 794-794
Author(s):  
Shannon Jarrott ◽  
Shelbie Turner ◽  
Jill Juris Naar ◽  
Rachel Scrivano ◽  
Raven Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Older Adult ◽  
Program Implementation ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Adult Participants ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
Participant Response ◽  
Intergenerational Interaction

Abstract Non-familial intergenerational programs engage younger and older people in shared programming for mutual benefit, frequently involving senior centers or adult day programs and preschools. With growing interest in the potential benefits of intergenerational strategies, it is imperative to know their effects on participant interaction during intergenerational programming. To address this knowledge gap, activity leaders at five sites serving older adults and/or preschoolers received training to implement 14 evidence-based practices during intergenerational activities involving 109 older adult and 105 preschool participants over four years. We utilized multi-level modeling to test whether variations in implementation of practices were associated with variations in participants’ responses to programming on a session-by-session basis. For both preschool and older adult participants, analyses revealed that the implementation of certain practices was associated with significantly more intergenerational interaction. Specifically, when person-centered best practices (e.g., leading activities that are age- and role-appropriate for older adults) were implemented, preschoolers (estimate=5.83, SD=2.11, p=0.01 and older adults (estimate=5.11, SD=.10, p=0.02) had more intergenerational interaction. Likewise, when environmental-centered best practices were implemented, such as pairing materials between intergenerational partners, preschoolers (estimate=6.05, SD=1.57, p=0.002) and older adults (estimate=6.50, SD=1.85, p=0.001) had more intergenerational interaction. Our findings reveal session-by-session variation in intergenerational interaction that can be impacted by implementation practices, which highlights the importance of training activity leaders to implement evidence-based practices. Researchers and practitioners should consider how session-by-session variation in program implementation affects participant response.

Lowering the risk of Alzheimer's disease: Evidence-based practices emerge from new research

2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kathryn Jedrziewski ◽  
Virginia M.-Y. Lee ◽  
John Q. Trojanowski
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
New Research

Disseminating, Teaching, and Implementing Evidence-Based Practices

2016 ◽  
pp. 247-266
Author(s):  
John C. Norcross ◽  
Thomas P. Hogan ◽  
Gerald P. Koocher ◽  
Lauren A. Maggio
Keyword(s):  
Implementation Science ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Research Evidence ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clinical Expertise ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
What Works ◽  
System P

Moving research evidence from science to service, from the lab bench to the bedside, poses a challenge for evidence-based practices (EBPs). Translation(al) research inclusively refers to the process of successfully moving research-supported discoveries into established practice and policy. This chapter begins with synopses of the empirical research on predicting adoption of EBP and the barriers to its implementation. The chapter then reviews effective methods for disseminating, teaching, and implementing EBPs. Like EBP itself, the new field of implementation science sensitively integrates the best research evidence, clinical expertise, and staff characteristics and preferences into deciding what works in each unique healthcare system.

Navigating the Evidence-Based Practice Maze

2012 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie L. Mazzotti ◽  
Dawn R. Rowe ◽  
David W. Test
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Secondary Students ◽  
Teaching Practices ◽  
Research Evidence ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Statewide Testing ◽  
Education Movement

Factors such as the standards-based education movement, mandated participation in statewide testing, and inclusion have forced an increased focus on improving outcomes for students with disabilities. There are many determinants of postschool success for students with disabilities; however, teachers primarily have control over only one, teaching practices and programs. As a result, it is important that teachers choose and implement practices that have proven successful for secondary students with disabilities. This article guides teachers through the process of navigating the evidence-based practice maze to identify evidence-based practices and programs for secondary students with disabilities. Particularly, it addresses the need to (a) follow a research-based framework (i.e., Kohler’s Taxonomy), (b) use practices with the best available research evidence to support effectiveness, and (c) use data-based decision making to guide use of evidence-based practices.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document