Evaluation of the role of pharmacy technicians in reviewing the eligibility for Oncotype DX genomic test and the impact of the test on treatment plans in breast cancer patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 1167-1173
Author(s):  
Vian Cheng ◽  
Adeline Markarian ◽  
Mario L de Lemos ◽  
Kimberly Schaff
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Oncotype Dx ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Genomic Test ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
Pharmacy Technicians ◽  
The Impact

Comparing practice patterns and outcomes for early-stage hormone receptor-positive and node-positive breast cancer patients with high-intermediate-risk Oncotype Dx scores in the National Cancer Database.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12520-e12520
Author(s):  
Keerthi Tamragouri ◽  
Ethan M. Ritz ◽  
Ruta D. Rao ◽  
Cristina O'Donoghue
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Oncotype Dx ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

e12520 Background: Oncotype Dx (ODX) is a commercial diagnostic test primarily used to predict the likely benefit from chemotherapy in ER+, HER2-, and node negative breast cancer. The prognostic value (recurrence risk) has also been demonstrated to apply to early stage lymph node positive (LN+) disease in a number of retrospective and prospective studies. The ongoing RxPONDER trial aims to clarify the predictive value of RS in LN+ population. In light of the initial results, we analyzed the practice patterns and outcomes for HR+/Her2 -/node positive breast cancer patients receiving ODX testing in the years from 2010-2017 with RS 14-25 in a retrospective observational study of the NCDB. Methods: Women with HR+/Her2 -/node positive breast cancer receiving ODX testing from 2010-2017 were identified in the NCDB using TAILORx and RxPONDER patients’ inclusion criteria: ages 18-75, 6-50mm invasive tumors, N1, M0, ER+/HER2 -. The impact of ODX results in the high-intermediate range (14-25) and other clinico-pathologic variables on the receipt of chemotherapy were compared. Additionally, we examined the impact of chemotherapy on overall survival (OS). Frequencies, Kaplain-Meier analysis, and changepoint analysis using the Contal and O’Quigley method were utilized. Results: There were 109,652 T1-2 and N1 patients of whom 32,506 (29.6%) received ODX testing. 13,461 (41.4%%) women had scores in the high-intermediate (14-25) range. The majority tended to have only 1 LN involved (1LN: 77.2%, 2LNs: 17.5%, 3LNs: 5.3%), had a mean age of 57.8y, were Caucasian (86.4%), and were preferentially tested at academic or comprehensive community cancer programs (79.2%). 6,610 (49.3%) patients were recommended chemotherapy, the median ODX score for all women who were recommended chemotherapy was 20 compared to 17 for those whom chemotherapy was not recommended. 5,068 (76.7%) women had documentation of receiving chemotherapy which correlated with improved OS regardless of age. Conclusions: In the group of women with HR+/Her2 -/node positive breast cancer, clinicians appear to utilize ODX testing in less than one-third of patients, possibly finding RS to be most useful in guiding adjuvant therapy recommendations when only 1LN is involved. Both the recommendation and receipt of chemotherapy correlated linearly with increasing RS, as expected based on the current NCCN guideline recommendations. We identified an OS benefit when chemotherapy was administered, regardless of patient age. Long-term follow-up in the RxPONDER trial will likely continue to clarify the predictive value of RS < 25 in the ER+/HER2-/node positive breast cancer population.

scholarly journals Impact of Commercialized Genomic Tests on Adjuvant Treatment Decisions in Early Stage Breast Cancer Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Hazem I. Assi ◽  
Ibrahim A. Alameh ◽  
Jessica Khoury ◽  
Nour Abdul Halim ◽  
Fadi El Karak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Treatment Decisions ◽  
Oncotype Dx ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Genomic Test ◽  
The Impact

Introduction. Advances in genomic techniques have been valuable in guiding decisions regarding the treatment of early breast cancer (EBC) patients. These multigene assays include Oncotype DX, Prosigna, and Endopredict. There has generally been a tendency to overtreat or undertreat patients, and having reliable prognostic factors could significantly improve rates of appropriate treatment administration. In this study, we showcase the impact of genomic tests on adjuvant treatment decisions in EBC patients. Materials and Methods. This is a retrospective study that includes EBC patients treated between December 2016 and February 2018. The physician’s choice of treatment was recorded before and after obtaining the results of the genomics tests. Baseline demographics and pathological data were collected from medical records. Results. A total of 75 patients were included. Fifty patients underwent Oncotype DX genomic analysis, 11 patients underwent Prosigna analysis, and 14 patients underwent Endopredict analysis. A total of 21 physicians’ plans (28%) were initially undecided and then carried out after obtaining genomic test results. 13 patients were planned to undergo endocrine therapy alone, while 8 were planned to undergo both endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. Treatment was changed in 26 patients (34.67%). The decision to deescalate therapy was taken in 19 patients (25.33%). The decision to escalate treatment was made in 7 patients (9.33%). Conclusion. Our study demonstrates the importance of genomics testing, as it assisted physicians in avoiding unnecessary adjuvant chemotherapy in 25.33% of patients, thus reducing side effects of chemotherapy and the financial burden on patients.

scholarly journals How Canadian Oncologists Use Oncotype DX for Treatment of Breast Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 800-812
Author(s):  
Xiaofu Zhu ◽  
Susan Dent ◽  
Lise Paquet ◽  
Tinghua Zhang ◽  
Daniel Tesolin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Oncotype Dx ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Medical Oncologists ◽  
Pathologic Features ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
The Impact

Background: The literature suggests that medical oncologists differ on how they use the Oncotype DX (ODX) genomic assay for making decisions about systemic therapy in breast cancer patients. Given the emergence of data supporting the use of genomic profiling for the prognosis and predicting benefit of chemotherapy, we surveyed medical oncologists in Canada to assess their usage and perception of the ODX assay. Methods: A 34-item survey was distributed to Canadian medical oncologists via the Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists. Data was collected on physician demographics, ODX usage patterns, and physicians’ perception of the impact clinical and pathologic characteristics make on ODX utilization. Results: Response rate was 20.6% with 47 responses received from 228 survey sent. Forty-five responses were eligible for analysis. Sixty-two percent (28/45) of respondents treated predominantly breast cancer, and 60% (27/45) have been in practice for at least 10 years. The most cited reason for using ODX was to avoid giving patients unnecessary chemotherapy (64%; 29/45). Sixty-seven percent (30/45) deferred making treatment decisions until ODX testing was completed. Factors most strongly impacting ODX utilization included: patient request, medical comorbidities and tumor grade. In clinical scenarios, ODX was more frequently selected for patients aged 40–65 (vs. <40 or >65), grade 2 tumors (vs. grade 1 or 3), and Ki-67 index of 10–20% (vs. <10% or >20%). Conclusions: This survey demonstrated that Canadian medical oncologists are preferentially using ODX to avoid giving patients unnecessary chemotherapy. The utilization of ODX is mainly in patients with intermediate clinical and pathologic features.

Comparison between different boost dose delivery techniques to the tumor bed of right sided breast cancer patients.

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 4605-4617
Author(s):  
Aly Mahmoud El-Hdidy
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Target Location ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Photon Beams ◽  
Lung Dose ◽  
Dose Volume Histograms ◽  
Tumor Bed ◽  
Boost Dose ◽  
Treatment Plans

Comparisons between three different techniques by which the boost dose was delivered to the tumor bed were carried out , aiming to present the best technique of treatment for right breast cancer patients.In this study, ten right sided breast cancer computed tomography (CT) scans were selected for ten early right breast cancer patients. We made three different treatment plans for each patient CT using three different irradiation techniques to deliver a prescribed boost dose of 10 Gy in 5 fractions to the boost PTV. In the first technique, two tangential photon beams were used, in the second technique we, two oblique photon beams were used and in the third technique, a single electron beam was used. The comparative analyses between the three techniques were performed by comparing the boost PTV- dose volume histograms (DVHs), the ipsilateral breast (right breast) DVHs, the ipsilateral lung (right lung) DVHs and the heart DVHs of the three techniques for each patient. Furthermore the dose that covering 100% , 95% of the volume (D100% , D95%) and the volume covered by 95% of the dose (V95%)of  the boost PTV of all techniques, were calculated for each patient to investigate the dose coverage of the target.Results showed that there were variations of the dose received by tumor bed, right breast and OARs depending on the technique used and the target location and size. A decrease of D100% than 90% of the prescribed dose was observed with the 3rd technique for patients 8, 9 and 10, and was observed with the 2nd technique for patient 5. A reduction of right breast dose was observed when the 3rd technique was use in comparison with the 1st and the 2nd techniques for patients 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8.  Also reduction of right breast was observed when the 2nd technique used in comparison with 1st technique. An increase of lung dose was observed with the 3rd technique for patients 1, 2, 5 and 6, also was observed with 2nd technique in patient 3, 5 and 7. A decrease of lung dose was observed with the 1st technique for patients 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9An individualized treatment, several plans using different irradiation techniques should be developed for each patient individually to reach the best boost PTV dose coverage with minimal OARs’ dose. 

Role of integrative medicine in the continuum of care of breast cancer patients in the Indian context

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Partha Basu ◽  
Richa Tripathi ◽  
Ravi Mehrotra ◽  
Koninika Ray ◽  
Anurag Srivastava ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Integrative Medicine ◽  
Continuum Of Care ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Indian Context ◽  
The Continuum

scholarly journals CBR3 V244M is associated with LVEF reduction in breast cancer patients treated with doxorubicin

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer K. Lang ◽  
Badri Karthikeyan ◽  
Adolfo Quiñones-Lombraña ◽  
Rachael Hageman Blair ◽  
Amy P. Early ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
The Body ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Echocardiographic Parameters ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The CBR3 V244M single nucleotide polymorphism has been linked to the risk of anthracycline-related cardiomyopathy in survivors of childhood cancer. There have been limited prospective studies examining the impact of CBR3 V244M on the risk for anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity in adult cohorts. Objectives This study evaluated the presence of associations between CBR3 V244M genotype status and changes in echocardiographic parameters in breast cancer patients undergoing doxorubicin treatment. Methods We recruited 155 patients with breast cancer receiving treatment with doxorubicin (DOX) at Roswell Park Comprehensive Care Center (Buffalo, NY) to a prospective single arm observational pharmacogenetic study. Patients were genotyped for the CBR3 V244M variant. 92 patients received an echocardiogram at baseline (t0 month) and at 6 months (t6 months) of follow up after DOX treatment. Apical two-chamber and four-chamber echocardiographic images were used to calculate volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using Simpson’s biplane rule by investigators blinded to all patient data. Volumetric indices were evaluated by normalizing the cardiac volumes to the body surface area (BSA). Results Breast cancer patients with CBR3 GG and AG genotypes both experienced a statistically significant reduction in LVEF at 6 months following initiation of DOX treatment for breast cancer compared with their pre-DOX baseline study. Patients homozygous for the CBR3 V244M G allele (CBR3 V244) exhibited a further statistically significant decrease in LVEF at 6 months following DOX therapy in comparison with patients with heterozygous AG genotype. We found no differences in age, pre-existing cardiac diseases associated with myocardial injury, cumulative DOX dose, or concurrent use of cardioprotective medication between CBR3 genotype groups. Conclusions CBR3 V244M genotype status is associated with changes in echocardiographic parameters suggestive of early anthracycline-related cardiomyopathy in subjects undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document