Who Starts the Conversation and Who Receives Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)? A Brief Online Survey of Medical Providers’ PrEP Practices

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 723-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah M. Adams ◽  
Benjamin H. Balderson ◽  
Kathy Brown ◽  
Staci E. Bush ◽  
Bruce J. Packett

Uptake of preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been slow, but is increasing. Although PrEP is indicated for many patients, it has been concentrated among men who have sex with men (MSM). Awareness of PrEP is limited among non-MSM individuals, and among some MSM. As such, individuals at risk for HIV who are unaware of PrEP must rely on their medical providers to initiate conversations about PrEP. Members of a national professional organization of HIV specialists with prescribing privileges, including physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants, participated in an online survey ( n = 342) to characterize their PrEP prescribing behaviors and the demographic membership of their PrEP patients. Results indicated that when discussing PrEP with their patients, providers who more frequently initiated these conversations had a higher percentage of non-MSM patients in their PrEP caseload (e.g., women, people who inject drugs, transgender patients). Encouraging providers to initiate discussions about PrEP with their patients and helping them locate support to offset the cost may help increase uptake, particularly among at-risk patients who are underrepresented in PrEP adoption.

Author(s):  
Gianluca Voglino ◽  
Maria Rosaria Gualano ◽  
Stefano Rousset ◽  
Pietro Forghieri ◽  
Isabella Fraire ◽  
...  

Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is suitable for high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infection risk people, foremost among whom are males who have sex with other males (MSM). This study evaluated knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding PrEP in a sample of Italian MSM, in order to hypothesize strategies to implement PrEP awareness and use. No previous study has assessed this issue; Methods: An online survey was given to an opportunistic sample of Italian MSM. The questionnaire investigated sexual behaviour and habits, HIV/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) knowledge and PrEP awareness, attitudes and practices. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to identify factors associated with PrEP knowledge; Results: A total of 196 MSM participated in this survey. Overall data showed that 87.2% of participants knew what PrEP is, but only 7.5% have ever used it. The main reason for not using PrEP was the cost of the therapy (26.9%). The principal source of PrEP information was the Internet (68.4%). Being regularly tested for HIV was significantly associated with PrEP knowledge (adjusted odds ratio (AdjOR) = 3.16; confidence interval (CI) = 1.06–9.29); Conclusions: Knowledge regarding PrEP was well established, but PrEP use was not equally widespread. It is necessary to improve research on PrEP usage in order to PrEP access to be granted.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Wei Zheng ◽  
Jia-Ling Qiu ◽  
Jing Gu ◽  
Hui-Fang Xu ◽  
Wei-Bin Cheng ◽  
...  

Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is not available in China and the willingness to use PrEP among Chinese men who have sex with men (MSM) is not clear. The aim of this study was to better understand the association between PrEP comprehension and the willingness to use PrEP under varying conditions among MSM. An online survey investigating personal characteristics, PrEP comprehension, and PrEP willingness among MSM was conducted. A third of respondents (36.2%, 196 out of 541) reported that they would like to use PrEP. Compared with MSM with a basic level of PrEP comprehension, MSM with a high level were more likely to report clear choices: a willingness or unwillingness to use PrEP (82.4% versus 65.7%, p <0.01). Among 350 MSM willing to use PrEP or uncertain about uptake, those with a high level of PrEP comprehension were more likely to use PrEP daily (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.04–2.80), and to use PrEP with mild or other side effects (AOR = 2.72 or 2.77). A high level of PrEP comprehension is a key factor in urging MSM to use PrEP under varying conditions. Our findings call attention to the need for health education to improve PrEP comprehension.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S439-S439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett Tortelli ◽  
Douglas Char ◽  
William Powderly ◽  
Rupa Patel

Abstract Background HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is effective but underutilized in the United States. The emergency department offers an opportunity to access at-risk individuals for PrEP referral. While several studies have described provider awareness and acceptance of PrEP, these studies have focused largely on infectious diseases, HIV, and primary care specialty physicians. Thus, PrEP awareness, knowledge, and concerns among emergency physicians remain unknown. We sought to determine provider comfort in discussing PrEP with patients among emergency physicians in Missouri. Methods We conducted an online survey among 88 emergency physicians at Washington University in St. Louis from February 2017 to March 2017 in St. Louis, Missouri. The survey included demographics, comfort discussing PrEP, having ever heard of PrEP (awareness), knowledge of the current CDC prescribing guidelines, concerns with use, and knowing local PrEP referral information. The questions were asked on a Likert scale and dichotomously categorized. We evaluated predictors of physician comfort of discussing PrEP with patients using multiple logistic regression. Results Sixty-seven participants completed the survey; 64.1% were faculty. Most (79.1%) were PrEP aware, however, only 23.9% were knowledgeable of current guidelines and 22.7% of referral information. Concerns included lack of efficacy (53.7%), side effects (89.6%), and the selection for HIV resistance (70.1%). Comfort discussing PrEP was 43.3%. When adjusting for the concern of efficacy, having PrEP knowledge (OR: 5.43; CI: 1.19–30.81) and having referral knowledge (OR: 7.82; CI: 1.93–40.98) were significantly associated with comfort in discussing PrEP. Conclusion We found moderate PrEP awareness among emergency physicians, but also high levels of discomfort in discussing PrEP with their patients. Future provider training should include addressing misinformation surrounding the concerns with PrEP use and prescribing, reviewing current guidelines, and providing local referral resources for PrEP patient care. Emergency department settings can facilitate PrEP awareness and referral to care among at-risk patients to help reduce national HIV incidence. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (1128) ◽  
pp. 531-533
Author(s):  
Zachary R Paterick ◽  
Timothy Edward Paterick

Hospitalists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and institutions are all at risk for the potential professional liability issues. The unique relationship between healthcare providers and their sponsoring institution generates complex and evolving legal issues for all participants. The law has played a great role integrating quality care and patient safety with physicians, while providing an avenue for relief when a medical error occurs. The intersection of law and medicine, while allowing for optimal patient care, exposes participating medical providers and the sponsoring institutions to specific professional liability issues. This article addresses the heightened medical practice risk that hospitalist physicians’ encounter in today’s practice of hospital medicine.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Fisher, PhD, RN, PPCNP-BC ◽  
Suzanne W. Ameringer, PhD, RN

Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the current opioid tapering practice.Design: Cross-sectional, online, survey research.Participants: Pediatric healthcare providers from a national sample of practicing nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and physicians who participate in five different pediatric pain and/or palliative care list serves.Results: One hundred four participants responded to the survey. The respondents were predominantly physicians (n = 58, 62 percent). The majority of respondents worked in an academic children's medical center (n = 50, 52 percent). The average number of years in pediatric practice was 16 (mean = 16.33, range of 0-45 years). Of the 104 respondents, only 22 (27 percent) had a written protocol for opioid tapering. Use of expert consultants such as pharmacists or pediatric pain management teams varied. The majority of respondents (n = 46, 44 percent) seldom or never consult a pharmacist. Only 22 percent (n = 17) almost always or always consult a pediatric pain team. There was a wide range of personal tapering rate preferences. Conclusions: This study provided a baseline assessment of pediatric opioid tapering practices by pediatric healthcare providers. Results revealed a marked variation in practice patterns that may indicate deficits in the assessment and management of opioid withdrawal in children. The need for the development of assessment-based opioid tapering guidelines for the pediatric population is long overdue.


2015 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 439-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie E. Cohen ◽  
Eric Vittinghoff ◽  
Oliver Bacon ◽  
Susanne Doblecki-Lewis ◽  
Brian S. Postle ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0014
Author(s):  
Tamara Valovich McLeod ◽  
Traci Snedden ◽  
Eric Post ◽  
Tracy Zaslow ◽  
Shelly Fetchen-DiCesaro ◽  
...  

Background: Sport specialization is increasingly common in many youth sports and has been linked to increased injury, overtraining, and burnout. Several organizations have developed safe sport recommendations in an effort to mitigate injury risk. Healthcare providers (HCPs) can be a source of education for parents and athletes on safe sports practices, but the awareness, confidence, and use of these recommendations among HCPs who work with youth athletes is limited. Hypothesis/Purpose: To evaluate the awareness, confidence, and use of sports specialization and safe sport recommendations of HCPs who work with pediatric athletes. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was developed to assess pediatric HCP awareness of, confidence in, and clinical use of sports specialization recommendations. The survey included 1) personal demographics, 2) professional demographics, 3) knowledge and perceptions of sport specialization, 4) awareness, confidence, and use of recommendations, and 5) HCP program training and professional development background specific to sports specialization. Survey links were sent by email to 5000 secondary school athletic trainers and 297 PRiSM members during October 2019-January 2020. The survey was open for 4 weeks, with a reminder email sent after 2 weeks. Data was analyzed with descriptive statistics. Results: The survey was accessed by 620 HCPs (access rate=11.7%) and completed by 508 HCPs (completion rate=81.9%). Respondents (279 females, 228 males; age=37.2±10.5 years) included athletic trainers (74.5%, n=379), physicians (16.9%, n=86, physical therapists (6.7%, n=35), nurse practitioners (1.0%, n=5), and physician assistants (0.1%, n=4) with 11.2±9.1 years of experience providing care to pediatric athletes. Three-fourths of respondents (n=373) were aware of recommendations from the National Athletic Trainers’ Association, but fewer were aware of those from the American Academic of Pediatrics (42.3%, n=212), American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (40.3%, n=200), American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (45.2%, n=225), International Olympic Committee (14.2%, n=69), Major League Baseball (30.6%, n=151), USA Hockey (13.6%, n=66), and National Basketball League (9.3%, n=45). The percentage of respondents who were confident in knowledge of (Table 1) and used (Table 2) each organization’s recommendation are provided in the tables. Table 3 presents the degree to which various reasons limit the use of sports specialization recommendations. Conclusion: Healthcare providers are aware of sport specialization recommendations and believe they are associated with decreased risk of injury. However, barriers to applying the recommendations most cited were the inability of parents and children to change specialization behaviors. Future research should focus on implementation of recommendations to enact behavior change. Tables [Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text]


PEDIATRICS ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 135 (4) ◽  
pp. e895-e902 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Beck ◽  
M. M. Lineer ◽  
M. Melzer-Lange ◽  
P. Simpson ◽  
M. Nugent ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document