scholarly journals Safety Assessment of Pentaerythrityl Tetra-Di-t-Butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate as Used in Cosmetics

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 80S-89S ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilbur Johnson ◽  
Wilma F. Bergfeld ◽  
Donald V. Belsito ◽  
Ronald A. Hill ◽  
Curtis D. Klaassen ◽  
...  

Pentaerythrityl tetra-di -t-butyl hydroxyhydrocinnamate functions as an antioxidant in cosmetic products and is used at concentrations up to 0.8%. Given the high molecular weight of this ingredient, skin penetration is not likely. The available toxicity data, together with the low ingredient use concentrations, suggest that systemic toxicity would not be likely if percutaneous absorption were to occur. Additionally, the negative human repeated insult patch test data at a concentration of 0.5% were deemed sufficient for evaluating the skin irritation and sensitization potential of pentaerythrityl tetra-di -t-butyl hydroxyhydrocinnamate over the range of use concentrations in cosmetic products. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel concluded that pentaerythrityl tetra-di -t-butyl hydroxyhydrocinnamate is safe in cosmetics in the present practices of use and concentration described in this safety assessment.

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5S-9S
Author(s):  
Wilbur Johnson ◽  
Wilma F. Bergfeld ◽  
Donald V. Belsito ◽  
Ronald A. Hill ◽  
Curtis D. Klaassen ◽  
...  

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel (Panel) reviewed the safety of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-150 pentaerythrityl tetrastearate, which functions as a viscosity-increasing agent-aqueous in cosmetic products and is being used at concentrations up to 5%. Given the chemical structure (large molecule), skin penetration is not likely. The available toxicity data and the low ingredient use concentrations suggest that systemic toxicity would not be likely even if percutaneous absorption were to occur. Additionally, the negative human repeated insult patch test data on the undiluted ingredient were deemed sufficient for evaluating skin irritation and sensitization potential. The Panel concluded that PEG-150 pentaerythrityl tetrastearate is safe in cosmetics in the present practices of use and concentration described in this safety assessment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 70S-83S
Author(s):  
Wilbur Johnson ◽  
Bart Heldreth ◽  
Wilma F. Bergfeld ◽  
Donald V. Belsito ◽  
Ronald A. Hill ◽  
...  

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel (Panel) reviewed the safety of alkyl polyethylene glycol (PEG) sulfosuccinates, which function in cosmetics mostly as surfactants/cleansing agents. Although these ingredients may cause ocular and skin irritation, dermal penetration is unlikely because of the substantial polarity and molecular size of these ingredients. The Panel considered the negative oral carcinogenicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity data on chemically related laureths (PEG lauryl ethers) and negative repeated dose toxicity and skin sensitization data on disodium laureth sulfosuccinate supported the safety of these alkyl PEG sulfosuccinates in cosmetic products, but. The CIR Expert Panel concluded that the alkyl PEG sulfosuccinates are safe in the present practices of use and concentration when formulated to be nonirritating.


2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 147S-168S ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilbur Johnson ◽  
Wilma F. Bergfeld ◽  
Donald V. Belsito ◽  
Ronald A. Hill ◽  
Curtis D. Klaassen ◽  
...  

Caprylyl glycol and related 1,2-glycols are used mostly as skin and hair conditioning agents and viscosity agents in cosmetic products, and caprylyl glycol and pentylene glycol also function as cosmetic preservatives. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel noted that, while these ingredients are dermally absorbed, modeling data predicted decreased skin penetration of longer chain 1,2-glycols. Because the negative oral toxicity data on shorter chain 1,2-glycols and genotoxicity data support the safety of the 1,2-glycols reviewed in this safety assessment, the Panel concluded that these ingredients are safe in the present practices of use and concentration described in this safety assessment.


2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 47S-53S ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilbur Johnson ◽  
Bart Heldreth ◽  
Wilma F. Bergfeld ◽  
Donald V. Belsito ◽  
Ronald A. Hill ◽  
...  

Polyquaternium-22 and polyquaternium-39 are polymers that function as antistatic agents, film formers, and hair fixatives in cosmetic products. These ingredients are being used at concentrations up to 2% (polyquaternium-22, in a rinse-off product) and up to 3% (polyquaternium-39, in rinse-off and leave-on products). The unreacted monomer content of these ingredients was considered low and of no toxicological concern. Limited data showed no skin irritation/sensitization. Although these ingredients were nongenotoxic in bacterial assays, mammalian genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, and reproductive and developmental toxicity data were not available. These polymers, however, are large, highly polar molecules that would likely not be absorbed, and neither local effects in the respiratory tract nor systemic toxicity are expected following product application/exposure. The Expert Panel concluded that polyquaternium-22 and polyquaternium-39 are safe in the present practices of use and concentration in cosmetic formulations.


1999 ◽  
Vol 18 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11-31

Nonoxynol-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6, -7, and -8 (low molecular weight Nonoxynols) are ethoxylated alkylphenols used in cosmetic formulations as surfactants-emulsifying agents, principally in hair dyes and colors. The safety of Nonoxynols were assessed previously (Elder, R. L., ed. 1983. Final report on the safety assessment of Nonoxynol-2, -4, -8, -9, -10, -12, -14, -15, -30, -40, and -50. J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 2:35–60). This report amends the conclusion on Nonoxynol-2, -4, and -8 reached in that report. There was no significant skin penetration using cadaver skin in which Nonoxynols-2, -4, and -9 were applied in conditions simulating leave-on or rinse-off applications. Under both conditions, the total skin penetration of Nonoxynol-2, -4, and -9 was less than 1% over a 48-hour period. Results of acute oral toxicity studies indicated that these low molecular weight Nonoxynols were at most slightly toxic. Nonoxynol-5 and -6 produce severe ocular irritation in test animals. They also produce skin irritation in test animals, but are not sensitizers. Due to the severity of ocular irritation reactions in animals, avoiding the use of products containing low molecular weight Nonoxynols in the area surrounding the eyes was discussed. The no-adverse-effect level in reproductive and developmental toxicity tests in which Nonoxynol-9 was delivered orally or intravaginally was higher than any possible exposure from cosmetic products. There was no evidence for genotoxicity or carcinogenicity. Ethylene oxide residues, although present in small amounts in several preparations, were not considered sufficient to present a carcinogenesis risk. The report discusses the need to ensure that the use of cosmetic products containing Nonoxynols should not result in ethylene oxide exposures above 0.1 mg/day. Unreacted nonylphenol may be present in low molecular weight Nonoxynols, but levels appear to be <500 ppm. The report discusses the need for cosmetic product formulators to exercise care so that any Nonylphenol in finished products is not found in toxic amounts. Clinical studies using Nonoxynol-9 showed irritation of the vaginal mucosa, along with increased epithelial disruption. A 2% solution of Nonoxynol-8.3 and -9 was sensitizing in dermatitis patients. A repeat insult patch test in normal volunteers using Nonoxynol-2 at a concentration of 5 % showed no evidence of allergic contact dermatitis, but there were reactions at 10%. Based on the available animal and clinical data, Nonoxynols-1 through -8 are safe as used in rinse-off products and safe for use in leave-on products at concentrations no greater than 5%.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 57S-66S ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilbur Johnson ◽  
Bart Heldreth ◽  
Wilma F. Bergfeld ◽  
Donald V. Belsito ◽  
Ronald A. Hill ◽  
...  

Anthemis nobilis (Roman chamomile) flower extract, anthemis nobilis flower oil, anthemis nobilis flower powder, and anthemis nobilis flower water are ingredients that function as fragrance ingredients and skin-conditioning agents in cosmetic products. These ingredients are being used at concentrations up to 10% (anthemis nobilis flower water) in cosmetic products. The available data indicate that these 4 ingredients are not irritating or sensitizing. Chemical composition data and the low use concentrations suggest that systemic toxicity would not be likely if percutaneous absorption of constituents were to occur. Formulations may contain more than 1 botanical ingredient; each may contribute to the final concentration of a single component. Manufacturers were cautioned to avoid reaching levels of plant constituents that may cause sensitization or other adverse effects. Industry should continue to use good manufacturing practices to limit impurities in the ingredient before blending into cosmetic formulations. The Expert Panel concluded that these ingredients are safe in the present practices of use and concentration in cosmetics, when formulated to be nonsensitizing.


2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 149S-227S ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilbur Johnson ◽  
Wilma F. Bergfeld ◽  
Donald V. Belsito ◽  
Ronald A. Hill ◽  
Curtis D. Klaassen ◽  
...  

Cyclomethicone (mixture) and the specific chain length cyclic siloxanes (n = 4-7) reviewed in this safety assessment are cyclic dimethyl polysiloxane compounds. These ingredients have the skin/hair conditioning agent function in common. Minimal percutaneous absorption was associated with these ingredients and the available data do not suggest skin irritation or sensitization potential. Also, it is not likely that dermal exposure to these ingredients from cosmetics would cause significant systemic exposure. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel concluded that these ingredients are safe in the present practices of use and concentration.


2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 35S-65S ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilbur Johnson ◽  
Bart Heldreth ◽  
Wilma F. Bergfeld ◽  
Donald V. Belsito ◽  
Ronald A. Hill ◽  
...  

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel (Panel) reviewed the safety of 16 galactomannans as used in cosmetics. These ingredients are legume polysaccharides that function mostly as hair/skin-conditioning agents and viscosity-increasing agents in cosmetic products. Their substantial molecular sizes suggest that skin penetration of these ingredients would be unlikely. The Panel concluded that these galactomannans are safe in the present practices of use and concentration described in this safety assessment.


1997 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-315 ◽  

PPG-5 Lanolin Wax and PPG-5 Lanolin Wax Glyceride are used in cosmetic formualations as skin conditioning agents–emollients. The basic components of these polypropylene glycol (PPG) derivatives were reviewed by the CIR Expert Panel. PPG was found to be safe for use in cosmetic products as concentrations of up to 50%. Lanolin Wax was found to be safe for topical application in the present practices of use and concentration (which ranged from 0.1% to 50%). Subchronic oral studies on the two PPG derivatives covered in this report indicate no systemic toxicity in rats. Ocular irritation in animals was reported to be minimal, as was dermal irritation. Clinical testing found no irritation upon treatment with 7.5% PPG-5 Lanolin Wax (as contained in an eye shadow formulation), and no sensitization in a repeated insult patch test using 3.9% PPG-5 Lanolin Wax (as contained in a lipstick). In addition to these limited data on PPG-5 Lanolin Wax and PPG-5 Lanolin Wax Glyceride, the previous reports were reviewed and synopses of relevant sections included in this report. On the basis of the available data specific to these twoingredients, as well as the data previously considered in the reports on PPG and Lanolin Wax, it is concluded that PPG-5 Lanolin Wax and PPG-5 Lanolin Wax Glyceride are safe as used in cosmetics.


1986 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 373-390

Zinc Phenolsulfonate is a substituted phenol used in cosmetic products as an antimicrobial and astringent at concentrations up to 5%. This compound was moderately toxic when administered orally. No deaths or growth inhibition were reported in a 91-day rat feeding study. No significant toxicity was reported when Zinc Phenolsulfonate was applied dermally in acute and sub-chronic studies. A single insult patch test of a 5% aqueous Zinc Phenolsulfonate solution was negative for skin irritation in rabbits. Minimal skin irritation was reported when 100% Zinc Phenolsulfonate was tested. The Buehler test for delayed sensitization was negative. No eye irritation was observed in rabbits exposed to 5% aqueous Zinc Phenolsulfonate and only moderate irritation at 100%. No mutagenicity was observed when Zinc Phenolsulfonate was tested with and without metabolic activation in five Salmonella strains. Clinical assessment of Zinc Phenolsulfonate with product formulations indicated that Zinc Phenolsulfonate was at most a mild skin irritant in normal use, but not a sensitizer. It is concluded that Zinc Phenolsulfonate is safe as a cosmetic ingredient in the present practices of use and concentration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document