No effect of femoral canal jet-lavage on the stability of cementless stems in primary hip arthroplasty: a randomised RSA study with 6 years follow-up

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-422
Author(s):  
Vasileios Zampelis ◽  
Gunnar Flivik ◽  
Uldis Kesteris
Keyword(s):  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Primary Stability ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Femoral Canal ◽  
Hip Prostheses ◽  
Jet Lavage ◽  
Primary Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Stem Migration

Introduction: In contrast to cemented hip prostheses, the effect of washing the bone bed with jet-lavage prior to insertion of cementless stem components in primary hip arthroplasty (THA) is unclear. Jet-lavage potentially decreases the risk of fat embolisation during rasping and stem insertion and might help in avoiding bacterial contamination. An earlier animal study has shown less debris and better-organised trabecular structure of new bone when jet-lavage was used. We hypothesised that the primary stability of cementless femoral stems implanted after jet-lavage of the femoral canal prior to stem insertion would improve with earlier stabilisation, as measured with Radiostereometry (RSA), compared with insertion without prior jet-lavage. Methods: 40 patients with primary osteoarthritis operated on with a cementless titanium grit blasted stem are included in the study. The patients were randomised to either jet-lavage or control without any lavage of the femoral canal prior to insertion of the prosthesis. The stem migration pattern was measured with RSA at 0, 3, 12, 24 and 72 months. Results: At 6 years, 19 patients remained for analysis in the jet-lavage and 18 in the control group. We found no difference in extent or pattern of migration as measured with RSA. Both groups seemed to have stabilised within 3 months after a slight subsidence and retroversion. No stem was revised or considered loose as measured with RSA. Conclusions: Washing the bone bed with jet-lavage prior to insertion of cementless stems does not affect the stability of cementless femoral components. No adverse effects were observed.

scholarly journals Augmented Rehabilitation Program for Young Patients Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Negm ◽  
Milad Yavarai ◽  
Gian Jhangri ◽  
Robert Haennel ◽  
Allyson Jones
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Rehabilitation Program ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
The Impact

Abstract BackgroundThe increase rate seen in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) for younger patients has implications for future rehabilitation demands for primary and revision THA surgery. This study aims to determine the impact of a 6-week post-operative rehabilitation program designed for THA patients ≤ 60 years on physical activity (PA) and function compared to age- and a sex-matched control group received usual postoperative care at 12-week post-THA. MethodsIn this quasi-experimental study, a cohort of THA candidates was recruited during their 6-week postoperative visit to their surgeons. The out-patient rehabilitation program consisted of 12 structured exercise classes (2 hrs/class) over 6 weeks. Physical activity was assessed using Sense Wear Pro ArmbandTM [SWA]. Participants completed the Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and THA satisfaction questionnaire before and immediately after the intervention. ResultsThe intervention group took significantly more steps/day at the follow-up compared to baseline. The intervention group had a higher mean change in the number of weekly PA bouts than the control group. Within the intervention groups, all HOOS subscales were significantly higher at the follow-up compared to baseline. ConclusionThe augmented rehabilitation program may have immediate effects on pain relief and symptom reduction for patients (≤60 years) following THA.

scholarly journals Subchondral drilling for chondral flaps reduces the risk of total hip arthroplasty in femoroacetabular impingement surgery at minimum five years follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal C Haefeli ◽  
Moritz Tannast ◽  
Martin Beck ◽  
Klaus A Siebenrock ◽  
Lorenz Büchler
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Dislocation ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Tönnis Grade

Introduction: The best treatment of acetabular chondral flaps during surgery for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is unknown. We asked if subchondral drilling improves clinical and radiographic outcome and if there are factors predicting failure. Methods: We treated 79 patients with symptomatic FAI and acetabular chondral flaps with surgical hip dislocation between January 2000 and December 2007. Exclusion of all patients with previous hip pathology or trauma resulted in 62 patients (80 hips). The chondral flap was slightly debrided in 43 patients/51 hips (control group). In 28 patients/29 hips (study group), additional osseous drilling was performed. 4 patients (5 hips, 6%) were lost to follow-up. Mean follow-up was 9 years (5–13 years). The groups did not differ in demographic data, radiographic parameters or follow-up. Clinical outcome was assessed with the Merle d’Aubigné score, modified Harris Hip Score and University of California Los Angeles activity score and progression of osteoarthritis with the Tönnis grade. Results: No patient underwent conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the drilling group compared to 7 patients (8 hips, 16%) in the control group ( p = 0.005); in the remaining hips, clinical scores and progression of Tönnis grade did not differ. Increased acetabular coverage, age and body mass index were univariate predictive factors for conversion to THA. No drilling was as an independent predictive factor for conversion to THA (hazard ratio 58.07, p = 0.009). Conclusion: Subchondral drilling under acetabular chondral flaps during surgical treatment of FAI is an effective procedure to reduce the rate of conversion to THA.

Importance of Retaining Sufficient Acetabular Depth: Successful 2-Year Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for Patients With Pincer Morphology as Compared With Matched Controls

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 2471-2480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia R. Brick ◽  
Catherine J. Bacon ◽  
Matthew J. Brick
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Acetabular Overcoverage

Background: Patients with pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement are commonly treated with arthroscopic reduction of acetabular depth as measured by the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA). The optimal amount of rim reduction has not been established, although large resections may increase contact pressures through the hip. A recent publication demonstrated inferior surgical outcomes in patients with acetabular overcoverage as compared with normal acetabular coverage. Casual observation of our database suggested equivalent improvements, prompting a similar analysis. Purpose: To analyze patient-reported outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in patients with acetabular overcoverage who were matched with controls with normal coverage, as well as to analyze associations with reduction in LCEA. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data were collected prospectively from patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up after receiving hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement by a single surgeon. Cases were reviewed to identify those with pincer-type morphology (LCEA >40°) and matched according to sex, age, chondral damage, and surgery date in a 1:1 ratio with controls with an LCEA of 25° to 40°. The surgical goal was to reduce the LCEA to the upper end of the normal range with minimal rim resection, usually 35° to 37°. Radiographic measurements of coverage, intraoperative findings, procedures, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded, including the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool, Non-arthritic Hip Score, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, visual analog scale for pain, rates of revision or reoperation, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Results: A total of 114 hips (93 patients) for the pincer group were matched 1:1 from 616 hips (541 patients) for the control group. The pincer group (mean ± SD age, 34.5 ± 12.2 years) did not differ in age, body mass index, or follow-up from controls. LCEA was reduced in both groups pre- to postoperatively: the pincer group from 44.0° ± 2.8° to 34.2° ± 3.5° and the controls from 32.9° ± 3.9° to 31.0° ± 3.0°. No differences in improvement were observed: iHOT-12 improved by 35.7 points in both groups ( P = .9 for analysis of variance interaction) and Nonarthritic Hip Score by 22.3 points ( P = .6). From all eligible surgical procedures, 2-year follow up rates were 2.5% and 2.6% for the pincer and control cohorts, respectively, and 1.2% and 0.3% for conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Conclusion: Arthroscopic management of acetabular overcoverage can achieve excellent results, equivalent to arthroscopy for other causes of symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. A key finding was smaller rim resections producing a mean postoperative LCEA of 34.2° with a small standard deviation.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the effect of force direction on stationary anchorage success of mini-implant with a lever-arm–shaped upper structure

2011 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 776-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki-Ho Park ◽  
Eun-Man Lee ◽  
Seung-il Shin ◽  
Seong-Hun Kim ◽  
Young-Guk Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Stability ◽  
The Other ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Removal Torque ◽  
Lever Arm ◽  
Mini Implants ◽  
Force Direction ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Experimental Group

Abstract Objective: To compare the effect of clockwise and counterclockwise torque on the primary stability of a mini-implant with a lever-arm–shaped upper structure. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four white rabbits were used for this study. Two screw-type mini-implants were placed in each tibia. In all, 96 screws were inserted. Two weeks later, a 2-N force was applied to the mini-implants without an upper structure in eight rabbits (control group). The mini-implants of the other 16 rabbits were loaded with an upper structure (experimental group). In the experimental group, the two left mini-implants were loaded in a clockwise direction (CW group) and the two right implants were loaded in a counterclockwise direction (CCW group). The rabbits were sacrificed at 1 week or 8 weeks after loading in both control and experimental groups. The removal torque value (RTV) was measured in 15 of 16 mini-implants in each group and the remaining implant was processed for histologic examination. Results: At 1 week there were no significant differences in the mean RTV between the control, CW, and CCW groups. At 8 weeks, the RTV was higher in the control and experimental groups than in the respective 1-week groups. At 8 weeks, there were no significant differences in the RTV between the control and CW groups, but the CCW group showed a lower RTV. Conclusions: CCW torque can decrease the stability of a mini-implant, whereas a CW torque has no effect.

The Wagner SL-Revision Stem for Aseptic Loosening: Clinical and Radiological Results 5 to 7 Years after Femoral Revision

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-100
Author(s):  
M.J.F. Diks ◽  
M. Spruit ◽  
J.J. Reimering ◽  
F. Den Boer ◽  
P.G. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Primary Stability ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Radiological Evaluation ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Revision Stem

Aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty can lead to proximal femoral periprosthetic bone loss. The non-cemented Wagner revision stem achieves primary fixation in the diaphysis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results after medium- to long-term follow-up of the Wagner prosthesis for revision of the femoral component for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty with proximal femoral bone loss. We performed 53 femoral revisions for aseptic loosening with the non-cemented Wagner revision stem. Clinical assessment included a modified Harris Hip Score and a radiological evaluation. The mean follow-up was 65 months. The Harris Hip Score improved significantly (42.9 to 72.3). Radiological evaluation revealed 24.5% subsidence (>5 mm) in our population. Nine re-revisions were done, eight in the first post-operative year. The re-revisions were performed for progressive subsidence (five), recurrent dislocations (one), subsidence with low-grade infection (one), false route (one), and aseptic loosening after 75 months (one). The cumulative survival rate of the Wagner stem after 12 months was 85% and 76% after 75 months. A relatively high re-revision rate was observed during the first post-operative year. Analysis of these failures has shown that subsidence may be the result of insufficient primary stability. Adequate pre-operative planning and intra-operative radiological assistance is necessary for perfect primary stability and fixation of the Wagner stem. The re-revision incidence after the first 12 months is 0.45 per 100 implants per year. The prosthesis has good survival potential after proper introduction.

scholarly journals Tear Replacement Therapy in Medical Support of Patients after Femto-LASIK Keratorefractive Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 274-280
Author(s):  
I. E. Panova ◽  
A. V. Titov ◽  
D. R. Mirsaitova
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Effectiveness ◽  
Tear Film ◽  
Morphometric Parameters ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Medical Support ◽  
Basal Secretion ◽  
Artificial Tear ◽  
Keratorefractive Surgery ◽  
The Stability

Purpose — to analyze the effectiveness of artificial tear drops HYLOPARIN-COMOD® in the complex medical support of the FemtoLASIK operation based on monitoring of clinical, functional and morphometric indicators of the eye surface’s condition. Patients and methods. The study included 25 patients (50 eyes) who underwent a keratorefractive surgery (Femto-LASIK) and were prescribed instillations of artificial tear drops HILOPARIN-COMOD®. To analyze the effectiveness of artificial tear drops HYLOPARIN-COMOD® in the complex medical support of the Femto-LASIK operation based on monitoring of clinical, functional and morphometric indicators of the eye surface’s condition: UCVA, BCVA, Schirmer’s II test, tear break-up time (Norn’s test), OCT pachymetry of the cornea and corneal flap. The treatment effectiveness was evaluated at 1 day, 1 week, 1 and 3 months after the surgery. Results. As a result of the treatment, the following refractive data were obtained: UCVA increased from 0.09 ± 0.02 to 0.94 ± 0.07 on the first day after surgery and to 0.96 ± 0.04 and 0.99 ± 0.07 to 1 and 3 months of follow-up, BCVA respectively, from 0.97 ± 0.04 to 0.94 ± 0.07, 0.97 ± 0.07 and 0.99 ± 0.07 after surgery. A faster restoration of the cornea and corneal valve was revealed, as evidenced by a decrease in their thickness already in the 1st week after surgery in comparison with the control group, where were more pronounced changes occur only by the 1st and 3rd month of observation (p ≤ 0.05). There was a significant increase in the basal secretion of the lacrimal gland (Schirmer’s II test) from 10.16 ± 1.33 to 11.66 ± 1.13 and 12.88 ± 0.96 µm by 1 and 3 months after surgical treatment, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). The Norn’s test increased from 10.89 ± 1.94 to 12.78 ± 1.59 and 13.83 ± 0.5 s to 1 and 3 months of treatment, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusion. The effectiveness of the HILOPARIN-COMOD® use in the correction of the dry eye syndrome after keratorefractive operations has been proven. The obtained results clearly demonstrate that the HILOPARIN-COMOD® preparation enhances not only the stability of the tear film, but also the restoration of the OCT morphometric parameters of the thickness of the cornea and corneal flap.

scholarly journals PERIOPERATIVE ANESTHESIA: TO DO OR NOT TO DO?

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 36-40
Author(s):  
S. A. Firsov ◽  
A. S. Lepilov ◽  
R. P. Matveev ◽  
V. S. Savinkin
Keyword(s):  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Motor System ◽  
Main Group ◽  
Narcotic Analgesic ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Treatment Results ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
And Control

Introduction. In patients with chronic loco-motor system diseases the pain often persists after arthroplasty and does not respond to symptomatic therapy.Purpose of study: to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative use of Meloxicam in patients after hip arthroplasty. Patients and methods. The follow-up covered 120 patients (mean age 64.4±5.23 years) after hip arthroplasty. In the main group (n=60) Meloxicam was given 7 days prior to and 3 weeks after surgery; after intervention narcotic analgesic was used on the request. In control group (n=60) the patients were only on narcotic analgesic on request after operation. Treatment results were assessed by 100-millimeter visual analog scale (VAS) and D’Aubigné-Postel Score.Results. Seven days before the surgery the pain severity in the main and control groups was comparable: 85±2.3 and 84±2.1, respectively. In 2 days after operation the pain relief was more pronounced in the main group — 69±2.1 mm versus 82±3.4 mm in the control group (p0.05). In 3 months those indices made up 10±2.1 and 35±12.6 mm (p0.001), respectively. In the main group the result was assessed as the excellent and good in 22 patients, in the rest of patients as satisfactory by d’Aubigné-Postel Score. In the control group the good result was recorded in 9, satisfactory — in 47 and poor — in 4 cases.Conclusion. Meloxicam may be considered as an effective perioperative analgesic in large joints arthroplasty.

scholarly journals Augmented Rehabilitation Program for Young Patients Following Total Hip Arthroplasty- Feasibility Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed M. Negm ◽  
Milad Yavarai ◽  
Gian S. Jhangri ◽  
Robert Haennel ◽  
C. Allyson Jones
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Rehabilitation Program ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: The increase rate seen in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for younger patients (< 60) has implications for future rehabilitation demands for primary and revision THA surgery. The primary objective is to examine the feasibility of a study comparing a 6-week post-operative rehabilitation program to usual care in patients ≤ 60 years undergoing elective unilateral THA. The secondary objectives are: 1) to explore the effect of a 6-week post-operative rehabilitation program designed for THA patients ≤ 60 years on physical activity (PA), function and participants’ satisfaction compared to age- and sex-matched control group received usual postoperative care at 12-week post-THA. 2) to examine the correlation between physical activity and self-reported pain and function.Methods: In this study, a cohort of THA candidates were recruited during their 6-week postoperative visit to their surgeons at a central intake clinic. The out-patient rehabilitation program, which was designed to improve function and increase activity, consisted of 12 structured exercise classes (2 hrs/class) on land and water over 6 weeks. Physical activity was assessed using Sense Wear Pro ArmbandTM [SWA]. Participants completed the Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and THA satisfaction questionnaire before and immediately after the intervention.Results: Of the 24 participants recruited, 14 participants received the augmented rehabilitation, and 10 participants were in the control group. All the study participants in the control and intervention groups completed the baseline and follow-up assessments without adverse events. Thirteen out of the fourteen intervention group participants completed at least 80% of the intervention sessions. The intervention group took significantly more steps/day (mean difference = 2,440 steps/day, 95% CI= 1678, 4712) (p<0.05), at the follow-up compared to baseline. The intervention group had a higher mean change of number of weekly PA bouts than the control group. Within the intervention group, all HOOS subscales were significantly higher at the follow-up compared to baseline. However, the ADL subscale was the only significant difference seen with the control group.Conclusion: The study intervention and assessments were feasible and safe in patients ≤ 60 years undergoing elective unilateral THA.

Comparative assessment of the primary stability of Straumann® BLX implant design using an in-vitro sinus lift-simultaneous implant insertion model

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Emmert ◽  
Johannes Spille ◽  
Eleonore Behrens ◽  
Mustafa Ayna ◽  
Fatih Karayurek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Stability ◽  
Implant Design ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Sinus Lift ◽  
Wide Diameter ◽  
Resonance Frequence ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Standard Implant

Straumann ®  BLX is a novel implant system, which has been proclaimed to provide an ideal primary stability in all types of bone. In the current study, the primary stability of Straumann ®  BLX implant systems with Straumann ®  tapered effect (TE) implants have been comparatively assessed in bovine ribs by using a simultaneous sinus elevation and implant insertion model.  In the study group, BLX (4.0 x 12 mm), TE (4.1 x 12 mm), BLX (4,5 x 12 mm) and TE (4.8 x 12 mm) were placed in each bony window, which resembles sinus maxillaris. As a control, BLX and TE implants with same sizes were inserted into the proximal diaphysis of the bovine ribs. A total of 40 implant insertions were performed. The stability was measured with resonance frequence analysis. In the study group, TE implants of 4.8 mm showed significantly higher values compared to 4.5 mm BLX implants (p=0.116). However, BLX implants of 4.0 mm in the control group showed higher stability compared to TE with 4.0 mm diameter. (p=0.014).  The primary stability of BLX implants in the control group was significantly higher compared to the experimental group in both widths (p=0.018 for BLX 4.0 and p=0.002 for BLX 4.5 respectively). The use of TE design with wide diameter in simultaneous implant placement with sinus lift could present higher ISQ values and might be more appropriate option for implant recipient sites with poor bone volume and quality. However, the advantage of BLX design in standard implant insertion protocols could be precious.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document