scholarly journals Individualized Treatment of Bone Marrow Edema of the Knee With the Aid of Classical Homeopathy: A Report of 2 Cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117954762090489
Author(s):  
Dionysis Tsintzas ◽  
Seema Mahesh ◽  
George Vithoulkas
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Image ◽  
Bone Marrow Edema ◽  
Central Component ◽  
Image Finding ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Image Finding ◽  
Marrow Edema

Background: Bone marrow edema lesions around the knee are a common magnetic resonance image finding. They constitute a central component of a wide variety of inflammatory and noninflammatory conditions affecting the knee joint. Those lesions are not only a significant source of pain, but are also connected to many musculoskeletal pathologies. Case Report: We describe 2 cases of bone marrow edema of the knee joint treated with the aid of Classical Homeopathy. In both of the cases, Arnica montana was the chosen homeopathic remedy. Conclusions: The results of the treatment are promising, encouraging for more research on this area.

Can Magnetic Resonance Imaging Differentiate Undifferentiated Arthritis Based on Knee Imaging?

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 1963-1970 ◽  
Author(s):  
YASSER EMAD ◽  
YASSER RAGAB ◽  
AHMED SHAARAWY ◽  
ALAA ABOU-ZEID ◽  
AHMED SAAD ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Bone Marrow Edema ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Undifferentiated Arthritis ◽  
Symptomatic Knee ◽  
Laboratory Investigations ◽  
Marrow Edema

Objective.To compare findings as observed on enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee joints, in oligoarticular-undifferentiated arthritis (UA) in those with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthropathy (SpA).Methods.A total of 55 patients with knee arthritis were consecutively recruited for the study, including 25 with undifferentiated oligoarthritis of the knee joint(s), 15 fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA and 15 with SpA. Laboratory investigations included erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, complete blood count, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, serum creatinine, and urine analysis. In all patients in the UA and in the RA group, rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP2 antibody (ELISA) were tested. All patients underwent enhanced MRI of the more symptomatic knee. All groups were compared in terms of demographics, laboratory investigations, and MRI findings.Results.Synovial thickness differed significantly in the RA group compared to UA and SpA groups (p < 0.001). The RA group showed a higher rate of bony and cartilaginous erosions and bone marrow edema compared to UA and SpA groups (p < 0.001). Enthesitis was found in all patients in the SpA group (100%) and differed from RA and UA groups (p < 0.001).Conclusion.Patients with RA showed more destructive changes in terms of synovial thickening, bone marrow edema, cartilaginous and bone erosions compared to UA and SpA groups. Enthesitis is a common feature on MRI in SpA, while absent in the RA and UA groups. This latter finding may have important clinical implications for classification purposes, and can help to determine the evolving pattern of patients with UA of the knee joint.

AB1100 PERFORMANCE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING FOR DETECTING SACROILIITIS IN EARLY STAGES OF SPONDYLOARTHRITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1839.1-1839
Author(s):  
F. Ladeb ◽  
D. Ben Nessib ◽  
M. Bouaziz ◽  
W. Hamdi ◽  
E. Labbene ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Bone Marrow Edema ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Sacroiliac Joints ◽  
Early Stages ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Marrow Edema

Background:In view of the limited accuracy of clinical evaluation to recognize sacroiliitis, several imaging techniques such as conventional radiographs, scintigraphy, ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been used to examine the sacroiliac joints (SIJ).Objectives:The aim of this study was to assess the performance of MRI for detecting sacroiliitis in early stages of spondyloarthritis (SpA).Methods:This cross-sectional prospective monocentric double-blind study included 57 patients consulting for symptoms suggestive of SpA during more than 3 months between February 2014 and February 2017. Patients with conventional radiograph showing a confirmed sacroiliitis (grade 3 or 4) were not included. After clinical examination and blood sampling, eligible patients underwent MRI of SIJ. MR images were interpreted by 2 experimented musculoskeletal radiologists blinded to clinical and laboratory data. Two professors in rheumatology blinded to radiologists’ conclusions, analyzed clinical data, laboratory tests, HLA typing, X-rays and MRI images and divided the patients into 2 groups: confirmed non radiographic SpA (nr-SpA) or no SpA. This classification was considered as the gold standard when analyzing the results.Results:Fifteen men and 42 women were enrolled. The mean age at inclusion was 39.75 ± 11 years [17-59]. The mean duration from the first symptom was 47 ± 39 months [6.6-180]. Forty-three patients were assessed as nr-SpA (75.4%) and 14 patients as no SpA (24.6%). Thirty-three percent of patients were HLA B27 positive. Totally 22 patients had sacroiliitis at MRI, all of them classified as confirmed nr-SpA. Among the nr-SpA group, MRI showed bone marrow edema (BME) in 34.9% of patients and erosions in 44.2% of patients. Among the patients in whom the diagnosis of SpA was excluded, MRI showed bone marrow edema (BME) in 7% of patients and erosions in 7% of patients. A statistically significant association was observed between the presence of sacroiliitis at MRI and rheumatologists’ diagnosis of SpA (p=0.001). The diagnostic value of MRI lesions is presented in the following table:Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)Positive Predictive Value (%)Positive Predictive Value (%)BME34.992.993.731.7Erosions44.292.99535.1MRI conclusion: sacroiliitis51.210010040Conclusion:SIJ MRI had an excellent specificity for the diagnosis of SpA but a moderate sensitivity. Consequently, some patients in early stages of SpA might be missed by MRI. In addition, we found that diagnostic based solely on BME lacked sensitivity. Detection of erosions in addition to BME enhanced sensitivity (from 34.9% to 44.9%) without changing specificity. Indeed, many recent studies have pointed out the importance of considering structural lesions of SIJ in addition to inflammatory lesions [1, 2].References:[1]Weber U, Lambert RGW, Pedersen SJ, et al (2010) Assessment of structural lesions in sacroiliac joints enhances diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging in early spondylarthritis. Arthritis Care Res 62:1763–1771.https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20312[2]Weber U, Jurik AG, Lambert RGW, Maksymowych WP (2016) Imaging in Spondyloarthritis: Controversies in Recognition of Early Disease. Curr Rheumatol Rep 18:58.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-016-0607-7Disclosure of Interests:None declared

High versus standard magnetic resonance image resolution of the cervical spine in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-479
Author(s):  
Simon Krabbe ◽  
Mikkel Østergaard ◽  
Inge J Sørensen ◽  
Jakob Møller ◽  
Bente Jensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Bone Marrow Edema ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
New Bone Formation ◽  
Standard Resolution ◽  
High Resolution Mri ◽  
Marrow Edema

Background Sagittal magnetic resonance (MR) images are typically obtained with the same spatial resolution along the entire spine, but cervical vertebrae are smaller and may be harder to assess. Purpose To investigate if high-resolution (high-res) short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and T1-weighted turbo spin echo (T1W) MR imaging (MRI) sequences are superior to standard resolution for detecting inflammatory and structural lesions in the cervical spine of patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Material and Methods Images were obtained in 36 patients. Voxel sizes at high/standard resolution were 1.99/4.33 mm3 (STIR) and 0.89/3.71 mm3 (T1W). High-resolution and standard-resolution images were scored by two readers according to the Canada-Denmark (CANDEN) MRI spine scoring system. Results Higher bone marrow edema scores were obtained at high resolution versus standard resolution (mean 2.1 vs. 1.2, P = 0.040), whereas fat lesion scores (1.8 vs. 1.5, P = 0.27) and new bone formation scores (3.5 vs. 2.8, P = 0.21) were similar. High-resolution MRI did not classify more patients as positive for bone marrow edema, fat, or new bone formation in the cervical spine compared to standard resolution. Using lateral radiographs as reference standard, sensitivity for detecting anterior corner syndesmophytes with both high-resolution and standard-resolution MRI was low (range 7–22%) and sensitivity for detecting ankylosis was low to moderate (20–55%), while specificity was high (≥96%). Conclusion High-resolution MRI allowed identification of more inflammatory lesions in the cervical spine in patients with axial spondyloarthritis when compared to standard resolution, but it did not classify more patients as positive for bone marrow edema. The slightly increased sensitivity at high-resolution MRI seemed to be too modest to have any real clinical importance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document