scholarly journals Why Is Hyperparathyroidism Underdiagnosed and Undertreated in Older Adults?

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 117955141881591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Dombrowsky ◽  
Benjamin Borg ◽  
Rongbing Xie ◽  
James K Kirklin ◽  
Herbert Chen ◽  
...  

Introduction: Hyperparathyroidism significantly decreases quality of life, yet elderly patients are underdiagnosed and undertreated even though parathyroidectomy offers definitive cure with minimal morbidity. The purpose of this study is to determine why older patients with hyperparathyroidism are not appropriately diagnosed and referred for parathyroidectomy. Methods: We reviewed charts for a random sample of 25 patients aged 75 and older who had hyperparathyroidism and were referred for surgical evaluation, and 25 who were not referred. Two reviewers independently evaluated medical records to identify reasons for delayed diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism and reasons for nonreferral for parathyroidectomy. Results: The median age of our cohort was 84 (80-96) years, 90% were women, 60% were white, and median follow-up was 5.5 (1-17) years. In 58% of all patients, an elevated serum calcium was not acknowledged. Even when calcium and parathyroid hormone levels were both elevated, the diagnosis was missed in 28% of patients, and 16% with clear symptoms of hyperparathyroidism remained undiagnosed. For 42% of patients, a nonsurgeon informed them that surgery offered no benefit. Surgery was also rejected as a treatment for 36% of patients despite the development of new symptoms or rising calcium. Conclusions: Substantial gaps exist in processes for diagnosis and referral of patients with hyperparathyroidism that lead to underdiagnosis and undertreatment. To improve rates of diagnosis and treatment, strategies are needed to educate nonsurgeons and patients about the benefits of surgery and to modify care processes to more efficiently diagnose and refer patients.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marte Walle-Hansen ◽  
Anette Ranhoff ◽  
Marte Mellingsæter ◽  
Marte Wang-Hansen ◽  
Marius Myrstad

Abstract Background Older people are particularly vulnerable to severe COVID-19. Little is known about long-term consequences of COVID-19 on health-related quality of life and functional status in older people, and the impact of age in this context. We aimed to study age-related change in health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), functional decline and mortality among older patients six months following hospitalisation due to COVID-19. Methods This was a cohort study including patients aged 60 years and older admitted to four general hospitals in South-Eastern Norway due to COVID-19, from March 1 up until July 1, 2020. Patients who were still alive were invited to attend a six-month follow-up. Change in HR-QoL and functional status compared to before the COVID-19 hospitalisation were assessed using the EuroQol 5-dimensional-5 levels questionnaire (EQ 5D-5L). A change in visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 7 or more was considered clinically relevant. Results Out of 216 patients aged 60 years and older that were admitted to hospital due to COVID-19 during the study period, 171 were still alive 180 days after hospital admission, and 106 patients (62%) attended the six-month follow-up. Mean age was 74.3 years, 27 patients (26%) had experienced severe COVID-19. 57 participants (54%) reported a decrease in the EQ5D-5L VAS score after six months, with no significant difference between persons aged 75 years and older compared to younger. 70 participants (66%) reported a negative change in any of the dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L, with impaired ability to perform activities of daily life (35%), reduced mobility (33%) and having more pain or discomfort (33%) being the most commonly reported changes. 46 participants (43%) reported a negative change in cognitive function compared to before the COVID-19 hospitalisation. Six-month mortality was 21%, and increased with increasing age. Conclusions More than half of the patients reported a negative change in HR-QoL six months following hospitalisation due to COVID-19, and one out of three experienced a persistently impaired mobility and ability to carry out activities of daily living. The results suggest awareness of long-term functional decline in older COVID-19 patients.


Medicina ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 46 (12) ◽  
pp. 843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margarita Staniūtė ◽  
Julija Brožaitienė

The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in health-related quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease according to age, gender, and treatment method. Material and methods. The study enrolled 167 patients after acute myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The mean age was 59.3 years; there were 71.9% of males. General health-related quality of life was measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Patients were examined at the beginning of rehabilitation and after 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month follow-up. Effect sizes were computed to assess the changes in health-related quality of life over time. Results. Health-related quality of life significantly improved at 6 months, but improvements did not continue over time. The largest effect size was seen in the pain domain. Effect sizes were greater in the physical health domains among male patients and among female patients in the mental health domain. With regard to age, effect sizes were greater in the physical functioning domain among older patients. With regard to treatment method, at baseline, the CABG patients had the poorest healthrelated quality of life; however, the largest effect sizes were seen in this group. Conclusions. Health-related quality of life improved over 2 years; the greatest improvement was seen at 6 months. Males better improved on the physical component summary domain; there was no significant improvement in the mental component summary domain in males and females. Older patients improved better on the physical activity and physical component summary domains. Changes in health-related quality of life were related to treatment method.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pelin Oktayoglu ◽  
Nuriye Mete ◽  
Mehmet Caglayan

Abstract Objectives Defensins are a family of antimicrobial peptides. Elevated levels of human neutrophil peptides (HNP 1–3) are seen in blood samples of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and in many rheumatic diseases. It has been suggested that they may play a significant role in the progression and pathogenesis of these diseases. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the levels of HNP 1–3 in sera of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and its association with disease activity and other clinical features of AS. Methods A total of 36 patients, who met the Modified New York Criteria for AS, and 50 healthy controls (HCs) were included in this study. The Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) were used to assess disease activity. The Bath AS Radiology Index (BASRI) was used to assess radiological damage. Spinal and hip measurements were determined by the Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI). An AS Quality of Life (ASQoL) questionnaire was administered to assess the disease-related quality of life. Serum HNP 1–3 levels were determined using the ELISA kit. Results Mean serum HNP 1–3 levels were significantly higher in patients with AS (287.01±201.307 vs. 152.09±43.75 pg/ml) compared with HCs (p=0.001). HNP 1–3 levels did not correlate with BASDAI (p=0.519), ASDAS-CRP (p=0.424), BASRI (p=0.280), BASMI (p=0.168), ASQoL (p=0.307), ESR (p=0.706) and CRP (p=0.157) values. Conclusion Elevated serum levels of HNP 1–3 may play an important role in the pathogenetic mechanisms of AS. This result may give us an opportunity to develop new treatment strategies considering the role of these peptides in the pathogenetic mechanisms of AS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Walle-Hansen ◽  
A. H. Ranhoff ◽  
M. Mellingsæter ◽  
M. S. Wang-Hansen ◽  
M. Myrstad

Abstract Background Older people are particularly vulnerable to severe COVID-19. Little is known about long-term consequences of COVID-19 on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and functional status in older people, and the impact of age in this context. We aimed to study age-related change in health-related quality of life, functional decline and mortality among older patients 6 months following hospitalisation due to COVID-19. Methods This was a cohort study including patients aged 60 years and older admitted to four general hospitals in South-Eastern Norway due to COVID-19, from March 1 up until July 1, 2020. Patients who were still alive were invited to attend a six-month follow-up. Change in HR-QoL and functional status compared to before the COVID-19 hospitalisation were assessed using the EuroQol 5-dimensional-5 levels questionnaire (EQ. 5D-5L). A change in visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 7 or more was considered clinically relevant. Results Out of 216 patients aged 60 years and older that were admitted to hospital due to COVID-19 during the study period, 171 were still alive 180 days after hospital admission, and 106 patients (62%) attended the six-month follow-up. Mean age was 74.3 years, 27 patients (26%) had experienced severe COVID-19. Fifty-seven participants (54%) reported a decrease in the EQ. 5D-5L VAS score after 6 months, with no significant difference between persons aged 75 years and older compared to younger. Seventy participants (66%) reported a negative change in any of the dimensions of the EQ. 5D-5L, with impaired ability to perform activities of daily life (35%), reduced mobility (33%) and having more pain or discomfort (33%) being the most commonly reported changes. Forty-six participants (43%) reported a negative change in cognitive function compared to before the COVID-19 hospitalisation. Six-month mortality was 21%, and increased with increasing age. Conclusions More than half of the patients reported a negative change in HR-QoL 6 months following hospitalisation due to COVID-19, and one out of three experienced a persistently impaired mobility and ability to carry out activities of daily living. The results suggest awareness of long-term functional decline in older COVID-19 patients.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4287-4287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Kelly ◽  
Chintan Pandya ◽  
Jonathan W. Friedberg ◽  
Supriya G. Mohile

Abstract Abstract 4287 Introduction: Greater than 50% of newly diagnosed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) cases are ≥ age 60, and the numbers of older patients with NHL will grow as the population ages. NHL treatment may significantly impact health related quality of life (HRQOL) in older patients and thereby have long-term adverse physical and mental consequences. One recent evaluation of HRQOL following a cancer diagnosis among patients age '65 indicated a significant decrease following any NHL diagnosis, particularly in the physical health component. However, NHL is a collection of distinct disease entities, with widely varied clinical course. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a prevalent subtype often treated with curative intent. In this analysis, we evaluate HRQOL among patients diagnosed with DLBCL, using a novel nationally representative population-based dataset, and describe patterns in HRQOL by time from diagnosis. Methods: The National Cancer Institute sponsored Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medical Health Outcomes Survey (SEER-MHOS) linkage database is a research resource that allows for evaluation of HRQOL in cancer patients and survivors. The MHOS was administered annually to cohorts of patients randomly selected from Medicare Advantage health plans; each cohort was surveyed at baseline and 2 years later in follow-up. The MHOS measured HRQOL using the SF-36, an instrument with established reliability and validity for patients with cancer. The questions of the SF-36 capture data on 8 dimensions of general health that are grouped into physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) summary scores, capturing physical function and emotional well-being, respectively. Patients included in 6 cohorts (baseline 1998–2003; last follow-up on cohort 6 in 2005) were linked to the SEER database. For this cross-sectional analysis, we selected all patients age ≥65 that had a diagnosis of DLBCL (ICD-O-3 8680, 8684); HRQOL responses from the first available survey after DLBCL were used. SF-36 PCS and MCS (both scales range from 0–100) and poor self-rated health (self –reported fair or poor general health compared to other people your age) were compared among DLBCL patients by time from diagnosis to survey: 0–1, 1–3, and 3–5 years. HRQOL was also compared to patients that had MHOS data >1 year prior to a DLBCL diagnosis. Differences in PCS and MCS median scores were tested using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, and differences in the proportions of participants reporting fair or poor self-rated health were tested using the χ2statistic. Results: Median age and range for patients surveyed before, 0–1 (n=62), 1–3 (n=76), or 3–5 (n=31) years after their DLBCL diagnosis was similar (medians 73, 75, 74, and 78 years old, respectively; p=0.37). Date ranges for DLBCL diagnoses are as follows: 1997–2005, 1995–2004, and 1993–1998 for those surveyed 0–1, 1–3, and 3–5 year after diagnosis. HRQOL and self-rated health were low among the patients surveyed prior to their DLBCL diagnosis (n=296; PCS median=45.0, MCS median=56.3, poor self-rated health: 22.3%). In comparison, patients surveyed 0–1 year after DBCL diagnosis have even worse HRQOL scores (PCS median=33.6, MCS median=40.8, poor self-rated health: 51.6%; p=<0.0001 for all three comparisons). While older DLBCL patients surveyed 3–5 years from diagnosis have better quality of life (PCS median=36.0, MCS median=53.3, poor self-rated health fair: 29.0%) in comparison to the participants surveyed 0–1 year after diagnosis, PCS is still significantly different from the similarly aged group that was surveyed before their DLBCL (p=0.021). Conclusion: In this SEER-MHOS population of older patients with a history of DLBCL, HRQOL is surprisingly low. Older patients prior to DLBCL had low scores on both the physical and mental components of the SF-36, indicating vulnerability prior to diagnosis and treatment. HRQOL and self-rated health was statistically and clinically worse among DLBCL patients less than a year out from diagnosis, possibly due to therapy. Notably, HRQOL remains low, compared to pre-diagnosis, in patients surveyed 3–5 years out from diagnosis, particularly in the physical domains. This study provides a benchmark for HRQOL among older patients with DLBCL, an NHL subtype in which aggressive treatment with curative intent is a standard approach, and further research that evaluates HRQOL prospectively in vulnerable older patients receiving treatment for DLBCL is critical. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4681-4681
Author(s):  
Pedro de Oliveira Toro da Silva ◽  
Cristina Bueno Terzi ◽  
Antonio Luis Eiras Falcão ◽  
Sara T Olalla Saad ◽  
Fernando Ferreira Costa ◽  
...  

Background: Palliative care (PC) is an approach that improves the quality of life of patients facing problems associated with any disease that leads to multiple or hard to manage symptoms, through the prevention and relief of suffering by early identification and impeccable assessment of physical, psychosocial and spiritual problems. Sickle cell diseases (SCD) consist of a group of congenital diseases characterized by the presence of the sickle hemoglobin (HbS), which can polymerize and predispose to hemolytic and ischemic events. In addition to the acute pain events, sometimes recurrent and hard to control, lesions in target organs commonly occur, leading to multiple comorbidities and serious decrease in quality of life. Aims: To evaluate clinical and demographic factors that could influence physical, psychosocial and spiritual symptom burden and confer eligibility criteria to PC in a group of SCD patients. Methods: Clinical and demographic data of SCD patients were collected by interviews using a standardized questionnaire: diagnosis, time from diagnosis, number of comorbidities and of medical specialties on regular follow up, infectious episodes, need for seeking the emergency and for hospitalization during the last 12 months, delirium events, wounds, dysphagia, recurrent falls, adverse events to medication, quality of communication with the medical team, fears regarding the disease and its complications, religious support, age, gender, monthly household income (MI), level of schooling (SCH) and profession. Specific PC scores were also applied: Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and Palliative Performance Scale (PPS). Statistical univariate and multivariate analysis were performed. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. This research was approved by the Institutional and National Review Board; written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Results: Fifty-one patients were evaluated (SS, n=34; SC, n=11; SB+, n=3; SB0, n=3), with a median of age of 40 years (18-69). SB0 patients were considered in the SS subgroup for statistical analysis. According to ESAS, pain scores were worse for patients with a higher age (p=0.0039), higher number of children (p=0.0228), for individuals that had completed only primary school versus patients who received more education (p=0.0293), and for the subjects on follow up with three or more medical specialties (p=0.0411). ESAS evaluation for tiredness revealed worse scores for the patients that had no formal occupation versus those who actively work (p=0.0275). ESAS assessment for depression was worse in patients that had a lower MI (p=0.0080), lower SCH (p=0.0585) and for those who had been to emergency services three or more times during the last year (p=0.0290). ESAS for appetite scored worse for older patients (p=0.0165), for those with a lower MI (p=0.0105) and for the individuals with a higher number of comorbidities (p=0.0018). Regarding shortness of breath, ESAS was poorer for older patients (p=0.0330), for those with a lower MI (p=0.0009), for the subjects in follow up with three or more medical specialties (p=0.0064) and for the patients with lower SCH (p=0.0413). ESAS for best wellbeing was worse for the patients with a lower MI (p=0.0425) and for those with lower SCH (p=0.0314). Due to the low incidence of the following symptoms, no differences were observed between groups for ESAS evaluation of nausea, anxiety and drowsiness. PPS score was significantly better for married individuals (p=0.0490) and for those with higher MI (p=0.0121). Finally, patients with no formal occupation showed a significant higher risk of going to the emergency within twelve months (OR=14.286, CI 95% 1.475-142.857, p=0.0217). Conclusions: This study strongly indicated that SCD patients live with chronic limiting symptoms that significantly impair their quality of life, which make them a group eligible for PC. The results showed that age and a higher number of comorbidities significantly impact symptom burden. Importantly, social and economic factors, in particular a lower monthly household income and a worse level of schooling have a major adverse impact on palliative scores. These data reinforce the negative impact of social inequality in this underprivileged group of patients and the need of facing this problem when seeking global patient care. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Troels G. Dolin ◽  
Marta Mikkelsen ◽  
Henrik L. Jakobsen ◽  
Tyge Nordentoft ◽  
Trine S. Pedersen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) increases with age. Older patients are a heterogeneous group ranging from fit to frail with various comorbidities. Frail older patients with CRC are at increased risk of negative outcomes and functional decline after cancer surgery compared to younger and fit older patients. Maintenance of independence after treatment is rarely investigated in clinical trials despite older patients value it as high as survival. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an evaluation of an older persons’ medical, psychosocial, and functional capabilities to develop an overall plan for treatment and follow-up. The beneficial effect of CGA is well documented in the fields of medicine and orthopaedic surgery, but evidence is lacking in cancer surgery. We aim to investigate the effect of CGA on physical performance in older frail patients undergoing surgery for CRC. Methods GEPOC is a single centre randomised controlled trial including older patients (≥65 years) undergoing surgical resection for primary CRC. Frail patients (≤14/17 points using the G8 screening tool) will be randomised 1:1 to geriatric intervention and exercise (n = 50) or standard of care along (n = 50) with their standard surgical procedure. Intervention includes preoperative CGA, perioperative geriatric in-ward review and postoperative follow-up. All patients in the intervention group will participate in a pre- and postoperative resistance exercise programme (twice/week, 2 + 12 weeks). Primary endpoint is change in 30-s chair stand test. Assessment of primary endpoint will be performed by physiotherapists blinded to patient allocation. Secondary endpoints: changes in health related quality of life, physical strength and capacity (handgrip strength, gait speed and 6 min walking test), patient perceived quality of recovery, complications to surgery, body composition (Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectric impedance), serum biomarkers, readmission, length of stay and survival. Discussion This ongoing trial will provide valuable knowledge on whether preoperative CGA and postoperative geriatric follow-up and intervention including an exercise program can counteract physical decline and improve quality of life in frail CRC patients undergoing surgery. Trial registration Prospectively registered at Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03719573 (October 2018).


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e032746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuhiro Ikemura ◽  
John A Spertus ◽  
Takehiro Kimura ◽  
Kenneth Mahaffey ◽  
Jonathan P Piccini ◽  
...  

PurposeBesides the high rates of morbidity and mortality, atrial fibrillation (AF) is also associated with impairment of quality-of-life (QOL). However, reports covering non-selected AF population within Asian countries remain scarce. The objective of the Keio interhospital Cardiovascular Studies-atrial fibrillation (KiCS-AF) registry is to clarify the baseline and QOL profiles of the AF patients at the time of initial referral to identify areas for improvement and country-specific gaps.ParticipantsThe KiCS-AF registry is a multicentre, prospective cohort study designed to specifically recruit AF patients newly referred to the 11 network hospitals within the Kanto area of Japan. The registry completed its enrolment in June 2018. All patients were requested to answer the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaire both at baseline and 1 year, with planned clinical follow-up for 5 years. The registry also assessed individual treatment strategies including rate and rhythm control, stroke prophylaxis, and their impacts on patient-reported QOL.Findings to dateAs of December 2016, 2464 AF patients were registered; their mean age was 67.1 years (SD, 11.7), majority (69.7%; n=1717) were men and 49.2% presented with paroxysmal AF. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc (cardiac failure or dysfunction, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes, stroke including vascular disease, age 65-74 years, and sex category [female]) score was 2.3 (SD, 1.6) and oral anticoagulant therapy was used for 88.6% of patients with CHA2DS2-VASc scores ≥2. The median AFEQT-overall summary score was 79.1 (IQR, 66.6–89.1). Roughly 50% had significantly impaired QOL (ie, AFEQT <80) at baseline. Currently, 2307 eligible patients (93.6%) have completed the 1-year follow-up, of which 2072 patients (89.8%) answered the second AFEQT questionnaire.Future plansThe KiCS-AF allowed for extensive investigation of AF-related QOL in a non-selected population with long-term follow-up using a rigorously validated QOL assessment tool. Almost half of patients had impaired QOL at baseline. Further investigations aimed at providing care and improving patient-reported QOL are required.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document