Experimental evaluation of seismic response for reinforced concrete beam–column knee joints with irregular geometries

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 1889-1901
Author(s):  
Min Wang ◽  
Dichuan Zhang ◽  
Jainping Fu

Regular reinforced concrete beam–column knee joints are typically framed by beams and columns with similar heights. However, complexities in modern architecture layouts may result in irregular geometries for the knee joint. The irregular geometry refers to significant differences in the height for the beam and the column framing into the joint. For example, the height of the beam is considerably larger than that of the column, and vice versa. Seismic performance and behavior for the regular knee joint have been well examined through previous experimental research. However, the knee joint with irregular geometry (termed here as irregular knee joint) may have different seismic behaviors compared to the regular knee joint because the irregular geometry can produce different demands, stiffness, strength, and reinforcing bond conditions. Therefore, this article evaluates seismic behavior of the irregular knee joint including failure mode, strength and stiffness degradation, deformation capacity, bond-slip of reinforcement, and energy dissipation capacity through four large-scale static cyclic tests. The test results show that in general the irregular knee joint designed to the current code has low seismic capacity due to poor bond conditions of the reinforcement inside the joint.

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 863-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie M. Megget

The seismic performance of eleven half-scale and three full-sized reinforced concrete beam-column knee joints was tested under inelastic cyclic loading. Twelve joints were designed to the current New Zealand Concrete Standard, NZS 3101 while the remaining two were designed to the 1964 New Zealand Code, which contained few seismic provisions. All the 1995 designs approached or exceeded their nominal beam strengths in both directions and only degraded in strength at displacement ductility factors greater than 2, while the 1960 designs failed prematurely in joint shear at about 70% of the beam nominal strengths. Many of the half-scale joints failed when cover concrete split off in the joint zone, allowing loss of anchorage and slip of the top beam bars. Two full-scale joints were designed to carry the maximum specified code joint shear stress (0.2 fc′), and one subsequently failed due to joint shear when the concrete compressive strength did not reach the specified design value. A third full-size joint was tested with distributed beam reinforcement. This joint performed in a ductile manner to displacement ductility 4 but failed in the second cycle at that displacement, due to buckling of several rows of beam bars.


2000 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 490-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mostafa Elmorsi ◽  
M Reza Kianoush ◽  
W K Tso

A new finite element model for reinforced concrete beam-column joints is proposed. The model considers the effects of bond-slip and shear deformations in the joint panel region. The problems associated with modeling bond-slip of anchored reinforcing bars are discussed. The proposed bond-slip model is examined at the element level by comparing its predictions with other analytical and experimental results. The ability of the model to simulate bond deterioration and eventual pullout of anchored reinforcing bars under severe cyclic excitation is demonstrated. This model is incorporated into the global beam-column joint element. Further comparisons are made between the predictions of the proposed beam-column joint model and other analytical and experimental results under reversed cyclic loading to show the validity of the model to describe the bond-slip behavior of the joints.Key words: bond, bond-slip, finite element, beam-column, reinforced concrete, cyclic.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bashar S. Mohammed ◽  
M. F. Nuruddin ◽  
Muhammad Aswin ◽  
Nursyuhada Mahamood ◽  
Hashem Al-Mattarneh

Eight large-scale reinforced self-compacted engineered cementitious composite (R-SC-ECC) beams with different steel reinforcement ratios have been designed, prepared, cast, cured, and tested to failure at the age of 28 days. The experimental results have been compared with theoretical values predicted using EC2, RILEM, and VecTor2 models. Results show that failure modes in flexure and shear of R-SC-ECC beams are comparable to that of normal reinforced concrete beam. Nevertheless, contrary to VecTor2, models of EC2 and RILEM are not suitable for predicting reasonable ultimate moments for the beams, while results using VecTor2 model have successfully predicted the failure modes and load-deflection curves for all R-SC-ECC beams. It has been concluded that R-SC-ECC fall in the category of ductility class medium to high which gives advantages of using R-SC-ECC beams in regions susceptible to seismic activities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document