‘Who Ya Gonna Call …?’ Ethical and legal dilemmas in specialist children centres and district general hospitals

2021 ◽  
pp. 147775092110366
Author(s):  
Harika Avula ◽  
Mariana Dittborn ◽  
Joe Brierley
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Clinical Ethics ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
General Setting ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Paediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Ethical Challenges ◽  
Legal Cases ◽  
Ethics Support ◽  
The Uk

The field of Paediatric Bioethics, or ethical issues applied to children's healthcare, is relatively new but has recently gained an increased professional and public profile. Clinical ethics support to health professionals and patients who face ethical challenges in clinical practice varies between and within institutions. Literature regarding services available to paediatricians is sparse in specialist tertiary centres and almost absent in general paediatrics. We performed a mixed-methods study using online surveys and focus groups to explore the experiences of ethical and legal dilemmas and the support structures available to (i) paediatric intensive care teams as a proxy for specialist children's centres and (ii) paediatricians working in the general setting in the UK. Our main findings illustrate the broad range of ethical and legal challenges experienced by both groups in daily practice. Ethics training and the availability of ethics support were variable in structure, processes, funding and availability, e.g., 70% of paediatric intensive care consultants reported access to formal ethics advice versus 20% general paediatricians. Overall, our findings suggest a need for ethics support and training in both settings. The broad experience reported of ethics support, where it existed, was good – though improvements were suggested. Many clinicians were concerned about their relationship with children and families experiencing a challenging ethical situation, partly as a result of high-profile recent legal cases in the media. Further research in this area would help collect a broader range of views to inform clinical ethics support's development to better support paediatric teams, children and their families.

Ethical climate in contemporary paediatric intensive care

2021 ◽  
pp. medethics-2020-106818
Author(s):  
Katie M. Moynihan ◽  
Lisa Taylor ◽  
Liz Crowe ◽  
Mary-Claire Balnaves ◽  
Helen Irving ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Ethical Climate ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Interdisciplinary Team ◽  
Paediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Measurement Tool ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Ethical Challenges ◽  
Targeted Interventions

Ethical climate (EC) has been broadly described as how well institutions respond to ethical issues. Developing a tool to study and evaluate EC that aims to achieve sustained improvements requires a contemporary framework with identified relevant drivers. An extensive literature review was performed, reviewing existing EC definitions, tools and areas where EC has been studied; ethical challenges and relevance of EC in contemporary paediatric intensive care (PIC); and relevant ethical theories. We surmised that existing EC definitions and tools designed to measure it fail to capture nuances of the PIC environment, and sought to address existing gaps by developing an EC framework for PIC founded on ethical theory. In this article, we propose a Paediatric Intensive Care Ethical Climate (PICEC) conceptual framework and four measurable domains to be captured by an assessment tool. We define PICEC as the collective felt experience of interdisciplinary team members arising from those factors that enable or constrain their ability to navigate ethical aspects of their work. PICEC both results from and is influenced by how well ethical issues are understood, identified, explored, reflected on, responded to and addressed in the workplace. PICEC encompasses four, core inter-related domains representing drivers of EC including: (1) organisational culture and leadership; (2) interdisciplinary team relationships and dynamics; (3) integrated child and family-centred care; and (4) ethics literacy. Future directions involve developing a PICEC measurement tool, with implications for benchmarking as well as guidance for, and evaluation of, targeted interventions to foster a healthy EC.

scholarly journals Managing ethical issues in patient care and the need for clinical ethics support

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Doran ◽  
Jennifer Fleming ◽  
Christopher Jordens ◽  
Cameron L Stewart ◽  
Julie Letts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Ethics ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Clinical Ethics Support ◽  
Ethical Environment ◽  
Ethics Support ◽  
A Priority

Objective To investigate the range, frequency and management of ethical issues encountered by clinicians working in hospitals in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted of a convenience sample of 104 medical, nursing and allied health professionals in two NSW hospitals. Results Some respondents did not provide data for some questions, therefore the denominator is less than 105 for some items. Sixty-two (62/104; 60%) respondents reported occasionally to often having ethical concerns. Forty-six (46/105; 44%) reported often to occasionally having legal concerns. The three most common responses to concerns were: talking to colleagues (96/105; 91%); raising the issue in a group forum (68/105; 65%); and consulting a relevant guideline (64/105; 61%). Most respondents were highly (65/99; 66%) or moderately (33/99; 33%) satisfied with the ethical environment of the hospital. Twenty-two (22/98; 22%) were highly satisfied with the ethical environment of their department and 74 (74/98; 76%) were moderately satisfied. Most (72/105; 69%) respondents indicated that additional support in dealing with ethical issues would be helpful. Conclusion Clinicians reported frequently experiencing ethical and legal uncertainty and concern. They usually managed this by talking with colleagues. Although this approach was considered adequate, and the ethics of their hospital was reported to be satisfactory, most respondents indicated that additional assistance with ethical and legal concerns would be helpful. Clinical ethics support should be a priority of public hospitals in NSW and elsewhere in Australia. What is known about the topic? Clinicians working in hospitals in the US, Canada and UK have access to ethics expertise to help them manage ethical issues that arise in patient care. How Australian clinicians currently manage the ethical issues they face has not been investigated. What does this paper add? This paper describes the types of ethical issues faced by Australian clinicians, how they manage these issues and whether they think ethics support would be helpful. What are the implications for practitioners? Clinicians frequently encounter ethically and legally difficult decisions and want additional ethics support. Helping clinicians to provide ethically sound patient care should be a priority of public hospitals in NSW and elsewhere in Australia.

Attitudes to End-of-Life Decisions in Paediatric Intensive Care

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aslihan Akpinar ◽  
Muesser Ozcan Senses ◽  
Rahime Aydin Er
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Paediatric Intensive Care ◽  
End Of Life Decisions ◽  
Care Experience ◽  
Intensive Care Nurses ◽  
Futile Treatment ◽  
Intravenous Nutrition ◽  
Life Decisions

The aim of this study was to assess attitudes of intensive care nurses to selected ethical issues related to end-of-life decisions in paediatric intensive care units. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed in 2005 to intensive care nurses at two different scientific occasions in Turkey. Of the 155 intensive care nurse participants, 98% were women. Fifty-three percent of these had intensive care experience of more than four years. Most of the nurses failed to agree about withholding (65%) or withdrawing (60%) futile treatment. In addition, 68% agreed that intravenous nutrition must continue at all costs. In futile treatment cases, the nurses tended to leave the decision to parents or act maternalistically. The results showed that intensive care nurses could ignore essential ethical duties in end-of-life care. We suggest that it is necessary to educate Turkish intensive care nurses about ethical issues at the end of life.

From painful busyness to emotional immunization: Nurses’ experiences of ethical challenges

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 556-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Storaker ◽  
Dagfinn Nåden ◽  
Berit Sæteren
Keyword(s):  
Data Storage ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Ethical Challenges ◽  
Ethical Guidelines ◽  
Science Data ◽  
Daily Work ◽  
Moral Blindness ◽  
Qualitative Interview Study

Background: The professional values presented in ethical guidelines of the Norwegian Nurses Organisation and International Council of Nurses describe nurses’ professional ethics and the obligations that pertain to good nursing practice. The foundation of all nursing shall be respect for life and the inherent dignity of the individual. Research proposes that nurses lack insight in ethical competence and that ethical issues are rarely discussed on the wards. Furthermore, research has for some time confirmed that nurses experience moral distress in their daily work and that this has become a major problem for the nursing profession. Objectives: The purpose of this article is to obtain a deeper understanding of the ethical challenges that nurses face in daily practice. The chosen research questions are “What ethical challenges do nurses experience in their daily practice?” Research design: We conducted a qualitative interview study using a hermeneutical approach to analyzing data describing nurses’ experiences. Ethical considerations: The Norwegian Social Science Data services approved the study. Furthermore, the head of the hospital gave permission to conduct the investigation. The requirement of anonymity and proper data storage in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki was met. Method and results: The context for the study comprised three different clinical wards at a university hospital in Norway. Nine qualified nurses were interviewed. The results were obtained through a systematic development beginning with the discovery of busyness as a painful phenomenon that can lead to conflicts in terms of ethical values. Furthermore, the consequences compromising professional principles in nursing care emerged and ended in moral blindness and emotional immunization of the healthcare providers. Emotional immunization occurred as a new dimension involving moral blindness and immunity in relation to being emotionally touched.

scholarly journals Outcomes in Paediatric Intensive Care Units for Children with Life-Limiting Conditions: A national data linkage study

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorna Fraser ◽  
Sarah Fleming ◽  
Roger Parslow
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Linkage Study ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Paediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Group Sex ◽  
Limiting Condition ◽  
The Uk

ABSTRACT ObjectiveTo identify children with a Life-Limiting Condition (LLC) who have had an admission to a Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) in England and their outcomes. ApproachData for all children who had had a PICU admission in the UK between 1st Jan 2004 and 31st March 2015 were identified from the PICANet dataset. Linkage to inpatient Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data was undertaken by the NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre for all children who had been resident in England. Their standard algorithm using NHS number, date of birth, sex and postcode was used. All inpatient HES episodes from the financial years 1997/98-2014/15 were received. Although the data quality is high in the PICANet dataset, comorbidities are variably coded therefore identifying whether a child has a LLC or not is not possible. A previously developed ICD10 coding framework was used to identify individuals with one or more of these LLC codes in the inpatient HES dataset. ResultsA total of 199,548 PICU admissions in the UK for 135,759 individuals occurred during the time period of the study. Data for 43,565 admissions (32,025 individuals) were excluded due to not having been resident in England or poor quality demographic data. Data on 103,734 individuals (155,983 admissions) were sent for linkage. Successful linkage occurred in 102,722 individuals (99.4%). Individuals who could not be linked were excluded from the analysis.51.0% of these children had a LLC and these children accounted for 62.7% of the PICU admissions. The crude PICU death rate in the children with a LLC was 5.0% (n=4826) compared to 3.1% (n=1786) in those without a LLC. The OR of death in a model adjusted for diagnostic group, sex, age, and expected risk of mortality for children with a LLC was 2.11 (95%CI 1.97-2.27). ConclusionsChildren with a LLC account for a large proportion of all PICU admissions in England. Although only one in twenty of these children die in PICU, as death may be expected in this population of children more integration of specialist palliative care with PICU services may allow more choice for children and families.

Tracheostomy in children admitted to paediatric intensive care: Table 1

2012 ◽  
Vol 97 (10) ◽  
pp. 866-869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dora Wood ◽  
Philip McShane ◽  
Peter Davis
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Death Rate ◽  
Current Practice ◽  
Paediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Bed Days ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Paediatric Intensive Care Units ◽  
Common Intervention

PurposeTracheostomy is a common intervention for adults admitted to intensive care; many are performed early and most are percutaneous. Our study aimed to elucidate current practice and indications for children in the UK admitted to paediatric intensive care and undergoing tracheostomy.DesignA questionnaire covering unit guidelines, practice, and the advantages and disadvantages of tracheostomy was sent to all UK paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) participating in the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet). These results were combined with data from PICANet on all children in the UK reported to have had a tracheostomy performed during a PICU admission between 2005 and 2009 inclusive.ResultsOver 5 years, 1613 children had tracheostomies performed during their PICU admission (2.05% of all admissions). The death rate was 5.58% with tracheostomy versus 4.72% overall, but differences were not significant when risk-adjusted using the Paediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM2). All 29 units participating in PICANet responded to the survey. Prolonged invasive ventilation was an indication for tracheostomy in 25/29 units, but the definition varied between 14 and 90 days, and most respondents considered timing on an individual basis. Children undergoing tracheostomy during PICU admission account for 9% of PICU bed days in the UK.ConclusionsIn contrast with current adult UK practice, tracheostomy for children admitted to intensive care is infrequent, performed late following admission and usually surgical. Practice varies significantly. The death rate for children having a tracheostomy performed was not significantly higher than for children admitted to PICU who did not undergo tracheostomy.

The UK Genethics Club: clinical ethics support for genetic services

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 219-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anneke Lucassen ◽  
Michael Parker
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Ethics ◽  
Genetic Services ◽  
Clinical Ethics Support ◽  
Ethics Support ◽  
The Uk

Evaluating clinical ethics support in mental healthcare

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 452-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marit Helene Hem ◽  
Reidar Pedersen ◽  
Reidun Norvoll ◽  
Bert Molewijk
Keyword(s):  
Support Services ◽  
Clinical Ethics ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Mental Healthcare ◽  
Grey Zone ◽  
Ethical Challenges ◽  
Clinical Ethics Support ◽  
Quantitative Research Methods ◽  
Ethics Support ◽  
Ethics Rounds

A systematic literature review on evaluation of clinical ethics support services in mental healthcare is presented and discussed. The focus was on (a) forms of clinical ethics support services, (b) evaluation of clinical ethics support services, (c) contexts and participants and (d) results. Five studies were included. The ethics support activities described were moral case deliberations and ethics rounds. Different qualitative and quantitative research methods were utilized. The results show that (a) participants felt that they gained an increased insight into moral issues through systematic reflection; (b) there was improved cooperation among multidisciplinary team members; (c) it was uncertain whether clinical ethics support services led to better patient care; (d) the issue of patient and client participation is complex; and (e) the implementation process is challenging. Clinical ethics support services have mainly been studied through the experiences of the participating facilitators and healthcare professionals. Hence, there is limited knowledge of whether and how various types of clinical ethics support services influence the quality of care and how patients and relatives may evaluate clinical ethics support services. Based on the six excluded ‘grey zone articles’, in which there was an implicit focus on ethics reflection, other ways of working with ethical reflection in practice are discussed. Implementing and evaluating clinical ethics support services as approaches to clinical ethics support that are more integrated into the development of good practice are in focus. In order to meet some of the shortcomings of the field of clinical ethics support services, a research project that aims to strengthen ethics support in the mental health services, including patients’ and caregivers’ views on ethical challenges, is presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document