scholarly journals Effects of Venous Angioplasty on Cerebral Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis: Expanded Analysis of the Brave Dreams Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Randomized Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Zamboni ◽  
Roberto Galeotti ◽  
Fabrizio Salvi ◽  
Alessia Giaquinta ◽  
Carlo Setacci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Grading System ◽  
Cerebral Lesions ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Venous Angioplasty ◽  
Post Hoc

Purpose: To evaluate if jugular vein flow restoration in various venographic defects indicative of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients can have positive effects on cerebral lesions identified using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: The Brave Dreams trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01371760) was a multicenter, randomized, parallel group, double-blind, sham-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of jugular venoplasty in MS patients with CCSVI. Between August 2012 and March 2016, 130 patients (mean age 39.9±10.6 years; 81 women) with relapsing/remitting (n=115) or secondary/progressive (n=15) MS were randomized 2:1 to venography plus angioplasty (n=86) or venography (sham; n=44). Patients and study personnel (except the interventionist) were masked to treatment assignment. MRI data acquired at 6 and 12 months after randomization were compared to the preoperative scan for new and/or >30% enlargement of T2 lesions plus new gadolinium enhancement of pre-existing lesions. The relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated and compared. In a post hoc assessment, venograms of patients who underwent venous angioplasty were graded as “favorable” (n=38) or “unfavorable” (n=30) for dilation according to the Giaquinta grading system by 4 investigators blinded to outcomes. These subgroups were also compared. Results: Of the 130 patients enrolled, 125 (96%) completed the 12-month MRI follow-up. Analysis showed that the likelihood of being free of new cerebral lesions at 1 year was significantly higher after venoplasty compared to the sham group (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.01, p=0.032). Patients with favorable venograms had a significantly higher probability of being free of new cerebral lesions than patients with unfavorable venograms (RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.83, p=0.005) or patients in the sham arm (RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.37, p=0.005). Conclusion: Expanded analysis of the Brave Dreams data that included secondary/progressive MS patients in addition to the relapsing/remitting patients analyzed previously showed that venoplasty decreases new cerebral lesions at 1 year. Post hoc analysis confirmed the efficacy of the Giaquinta grading system in selecting patients appropriate for venoplasty who were more likely to be free from accumulation of new cerebral lesions at MRI.

Hopelessness Ratings in Relapsing-Remitting and Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

2002 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott B. Patten ◽  
Luanne M. Metz
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Interferon Beta ◽  
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Exact Probability ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Trial Participants ◽  
Over Time

Objective: Two recent randomized double-blind placebo controlled clinical trials of interferon beta-1a in multiple sclerosis have obtained hopelessness ratings using the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS). One of these studies, the PRISMS trial, evaluated interferon beta-1a in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Another, the SPECTRIMS trial, evaluated the same medication in secondary progressive (SP) MS. The objective of this analysis was to compare levels of hopelessness in persons with RRMS and SPMS, and to describe changes over time in the clinical trial participants. Method: Raw data from each clinical trial was obtained from the sponsor of the trials (Serono). Median BHS ratings, and the proportions at or above the BHS cut-point of 10 were calculated over a two (PRISMS) or three (SPECTRIMS) year period. Results: The analysis included n = 532 clinical trial participants. Ratings of hopelessness were higher in SPMS clinical trial participants (SPECTRIMS) than in the RRMS group (PRISMS) at baseline (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.0035). Furthermore, ratings of hopelessness were higher during follow-up than at baseline, in the SPMS group (McNemar's exact probability, p = 0.0015), but not in the RRMS group (McNemar's exact probability, p = 0.65). Depression was strongly associated with hopelessness in both RRMS ( z = 4.13, p < 0.001) and SPMS ( z = 5.24, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Hopelessness is associated with SPMS, and may increase over time in this group. Hopelessness may influence suicide risk in people with MS and may potentially have an impact on coping and quality of life. Additional research is necessary to define the clinical implications of hopelessness in persons with this condition.

The effect of low-dose naltrexone on quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 964-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naser Sharafaddinzadeh ◽  
Ali Moghtaderi ◽  
Davood Kashipazha ◽  
Nastaran Majdinasab ◽  
Bita Shalbafan
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Low Dose Naltrexone

Background: Low-dose naltrexone (LDN) may promote psychological well-being as well as generalized health especially in autoimmune disorders. The objective of this study is to assess the effect of LDN on the Quality of Life (QoL) of patients with relapsing—remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) using the scales and composite scores of the MSQoL-54 questionnaire. Methods: A 17-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, crossover-design clinical trial was conducted in two universities. A total of 96 adult patients aged between 15 and 65 years with relapsing—remitting (RR) or secondary progressive (SP) clinically definite MS with disease duration longer than 6 months enrolled into the study. The primary outcome of the study was comparison of the scores of physical and mental health by conducting independent t-test of the results obtained in the middle and at the end of study between the two groups. Results: Variables including presence of pain, energy, emotional well-being, social, cognitive, and sexual functions, role limitation due to physical and emotional problems, health distress, and overall QoL did not show any meaningful statistically difference between the two groups. Factor analysis revealed that health perception scores were statistically different between the groups before starting, in the middle, and at the end of the study. Conclusion: The study clearly illustrates that LDN is a relatively safe therapeutic option in RRMS and SPMS but its efficacy is under question and probably a long duration trial is needed in the future.

Effect of drugs in secondary disease progression in patients with multiple sclerosis

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. S46-S55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludwig Kappos
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
The North ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Effect Of Therapy ◽  
Almost All

Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) is a form of MS characterized by continuously worsening disability with or without superimposed relapses that occurs after a variable period of relapsing remitting disease and results in limited ambulation for almost all patients. The use of interferon beta (IFN b) for immunomodulation in patients with SPMS has been evaluated in four recent clinical trials: The European multicentre trial on IFN b-1b in SPMS (EUSPMS), the Secondary Progressive Efficacy Trial of Rebif (IFN b-1a) in MS (SPEC TRIMS), the North A merican Study of IFN b-1b in SPMS (NA SPMS), and the Internatio nal MS Secondary Progressive Avonex C linical Trial (IMPAC T). EUSPMS was the only trial to demonstrate a significant positive effect of therapy on disease progression as measured by the expanded disability status scale (EDSS). However, results from all studies demonstrated significant positive effects of treatment on relapse, T2 lesion load, and gadolinium enhancement. Immunomodulation with IFN b has the potential to significantly slow disease progression and improve quality of life for patients with SPMS. While results with monthly IV Ig were disappointing, positive effects on disease progression have been reported with the applicatio n of immunosuppressants, especially Mitoxantrone. The risk-benefit ratio of these cytostatic agents remains controversial. New strategies addressing the important neurodegenerative aspects of the disease are urgently needed.

CONCERTO: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of oral laquinimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

2021 ◽  
pp. 135245852110328
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Comi ◽  
Yuval Dadon ◽  
Nissim Sasson ◽  
Joshua R Steinerman ◽  
Volker Knappertz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Adaptive Immune Response ◽  
Secondary Endpoint ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Background: Interventions targeting the adaptive immune response are needed in multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective: Evaluate laquinimod’s efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods: CONCERTO was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase-3 study. RRMS patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive once-daily oral laquinimod 0.6 or 1.2 mg or placebo for ⩽24 months ( n = 727, n = 732, and n = 740, respectively). Primary endpoint was time to 3-month confirmed disability progression (CDP). The laquinimod 1.2-mg dose arm was discontinued (1 January 2016) due to cardiovascular events at high doses. Safety was monitored throughout the study. Results: CONCERTO did not meet the primary endpoint of significant effect with laquinimod 0.6-mg versus placebo on 3-month CDP (hazard ratio: 0.94; 95% confidence interval: 0.67–1.31; p = 0.706). Secondary endpoint p values were nominal and non-inferential. Laquinimod 0.6 mg demonstrated 40% reduction in percent brain volume change from baseline to Month 15 versus placebo ( p < 0.0001). The other secondary endpoint, time to first relapse, and annualized relapse rate (an exploratory endpoint) were numerically lower (both, p = 0.0001). No unexpected safety findings were reported with laquinimod 0.6 mg. Conclusion: Laquinimod 0.6 mg demonstrated only nominally significant effects on clinical relapses and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes and was generally well tolerated. Clinical trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01707992).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document