Is there a role for referral of high-risk patients seen in preoperative medical consultation for postoperative inpatient follow-up?

2021 ◽  
pp. 175045892110310
Author(s):  
Jessica Evans ◽  
James Chan ◽  
Delvina H Saraqini ◽  
Ranjeeta Mallick

The potential benefit of referring select high-risk surgical patients who are seen during a preoperative medical consultation for postoperative inpatient medical follow-up is uncertain. Over a seven-year period, our internal medicine perioperative clinic referred 5% of 4642 preoperative consults for postoperative follow-up. A retrospective chart review found that although reasons for referral were heterogeneous, those assessed by the medical consult team postoperatively were more comorbid, had more adverse medical complications and had longer hospital admissions compared to those not referred. Physicians were best able to predict adverse cardiac and diabetes-related complications. Half of the patients who were referred for postoperative assessment were lost to follow-up, and there was a trend towards increased hospital readmissions in this group. Further research is required to identify the subset of patients who might benefit from postoperative inpatient medical assessment.

2003 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 367-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria M. LoTempio ◽  
Marilene B. Wang ◽  
Ahmad Sadeghi

We conducted a retrospective chart review of treatment outcomes in 17 adults who had been selected to undergo concomitant chemotherapy and radiation (chemo/XRT) for late-stage oropharyngeal cancers. All patients had been treated at the West Los Angeles VA Medical Center between March 1, 1998, and Sept. 30, 2000. Nine patients had a primary tumor at the base of the tongue, five had a primary tumor in the tonsillar area, and three had a tumor that affected both sites. Of this group, 15 patients completed one to three cycles of chemo/XRT, and the remaining two died during therapy. At the most recent follow-up, 9 of the 17 patients (52.9%) were documented to still be alive; seven patients had earlier died as a result of their primary tumor or a distant metastasis, and one patient had been lost to follow-up after completing treatment. At study's end, the duration of post-treatment survival ranged from 2 to 36 months (mean: 12.5). Based on the results of our small series, we conclude that chemo/XRT is a valid alternative to surgery with postoperative radiation and to radiation alone. Chemo/XRT yields acceptable rates of local control and allows for organ preservation with tolerable side effects.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zunaira Shaukat ◽  
Raheela Mansoor ◽  
Najma Shaheen ◽  
Saliha Sarfraz ◽  
Komal Seher

Introduction: Rhabdomyosarcoma is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children. This paper aimed to assess the stage, site, and treatment outcome among rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) patients. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was completed from January 2011 to December 2017 of patients that presented to the Department of Pediatric Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, for the management of RMS. Data collection included clinical characteristics, staging, grouping, risk stratification, treatment plan, radiotherapy doses, and treatment outcome. Results: Among 24 subjects, there were a total of 13 (54.2%) males and 11 (45.8%) females. The median age at the time of diagnosis was 2.5 years (range: 0.75 - 17 years). The majority of the subjects (91.7%) were less than 10 years of age. The median follow-up time was 0.6 years. According to the Children's Oncology Group Classification, 4 (16.7%) subjects were classified as low risk, 14 (58.3%) subjects were rated as intermediate risk, and 6 (0.25%) subjects were stratified as high risk. The most common primary tumor site were genitourinary (62.5%) and abdomen/retroperitoneal (20.8%) regions. At the time of analysis, nine (37.5%) subjects had died because of the disease, twelve (50%) were alive with no evidence of disease, and one subject had a recurrence of disease and was alive. One subject had abandoned the therapy, and another was lost to follow-up. Conclusion: Patients with Rhabdomyosarcoma presented at the late stages of the disease, and it most frequently affected genitourinary and abdomen or retroperitoneal areas. Overall, Rhabdomyosarcoma was found to have a poor outcome to therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A479-A480
Author(s):  
Leopoldo M Cobos Salinas ◽  
Fernando Reyes San Martin ◽  
Merri Pendergrass ◽  
Dinkar Rupakula

Abstract Background: The achievement of the A1C goals in the US did not improve in 2017 compared to 2014. Guidelines for which patients with T2DM to refer to an endocrinologist are not well defined. Furthermore, there is no consensus about how long patients should be followed by an endocrinologist. Experts have recommended referral to an endocrinologist for new diagnosis, acute hyperglycemia, A1C > 7.0, > 8.0 for 6 months, or A1C 1.4 times the upper limit of normal. However, with the current number of board-certified endocrinologists in the US, it would be impossible for patients with those criteria to be seen even once. To determine which patients should be followed by an endocrinologist, it would help to know which patients are most likely to achieve ongoing benefit. To focus on patients that have a higher chance of improvement, it is important to know the average time it would take to reach an individualized A1C goal and focus on patients more likely to improve. Objective: We performed this quality improvement assessment to 1) determine the percentage of patients with T2DM who achieved their individualized A1C goals (Age 18–55: 7.0% +/- .5%, 55–75: 7.5% +/- .5%, >75: 9.0% +/- .5%) at 12 months after their initial endocrinologist visit and 2) compare characteristics of patients who achieved A1C goals by 12 months versus those who did not achieve goals. Material and Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with T2DM who had an initial visit at an academic endocrinology clinic between 10/1/2017 and 05/31/2018 (N= 48, 52% female, baseline 9.6%, 48% male, baseline [BL] HbA1c 9.9%). Data for 12 months following the initial visit were collected. Results: Following their initial visit, 21/48 (44%, BL A1c 10.3%) were lost to follow-up. Of those with at least one additional visit, 12/27 (44%, BL A1c 11.3%, P<0.05) achieved A1C goal by the 12-month period. Of those, 6/12 (50%, BL A1c 10.3%), 1/12 (8%, BL A1c 9.9%), 4/12 (25%, BL A1c 9.0%), 1/12 (8%, BL A1c 8.8%) achieved goals by 3, 6, 9, and 12 months respectively. Those who did achieve their goals were slightly older (52 +/- 25yrs) than those who did not (50 +/- 12yrs), p< 0.05. No significant differences between those who were lost to follow-up, achieved goals, or who did not achieve goals with respect to gender, insurance coverage, or regimen. However, those who did continued care had a worse A1c of 11.3%. Conclusion: Of patients with T2DM and uncontrolled hyperglycemia presenting to an academic endocrine clinic, nearly half are lost to follow-up after the initial visit. Future efforts should be made to better understand and potentially improve this. Of additional concern, only about half of patients with at least one additional visit achieved their A1C goal after 12 months, and 91% of those achieved their goals by 9 months. Further study will be needed to determine whether patients who are uncontrolled after 9–12 months will have any further benefit from endocrine follow-up.


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. E821-E828

BACKGROUND: The American Society of Regional Anesthesia currently recommends ceasing antithrombotic medications for all spinal epidural steroid injections, however there is a paucity of data on the true risk of spinal epidurals via various approaches versus the risk of cessation of an agent as it relates to the underlying medical condition. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the complication rate of caudal epidural steroid injections in patients who remain on antithrombotic medications. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Physiatric Spine Clinic in Orthopedic Specialty Office and Surgical Center. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed identifying patients (n = 335) who received a caudal epidural steroid injection (n = 673) from June 2015 through April 2020. Patients were included if they had received the injection while taking an antithrombotic medication. Patients were excluded if they were not taking an antithrombotic. The patient’s age, indication for the injection including magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography findings, antithrombotic medication, the medical condition requiring an antithrombotic, and any complications following the injection were collected via chart review. RESULTS: Of the 443 injections included in the study, 51 encounters were lost to follow-up. Of the other 392 injections, there were no reported complications, regardless of the patient’s imaging findings, age, the antithrombotic medication used, or the underlying medical condition for which an antithrombotic medication was indicated. LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective study. Therefore, a prospective study may have yielded fewer encounters lost to follow-up. Patients were not contacted directly after the procedure and chart reviews were utilized to evaluate for complications, which was limited to a patient’s reporting of perceived complications without any imaging. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that caudal epidural steroid injections can be performed safely in patients while taking antithrombotic medications. Catastrophic events have been observed in patients who have discontinued antithrombotic agents preceding procedures. Thus, discontinuing antithrombotic medications may pose a greater risk than benefit for patients on an antithrombotic medication who have painful lumbar radiculopathy. KEY WORDS: Epidural injection, caudal, antithrombotic, safety, steroids, anticoagulant, antiplatelet, epidural hematoma


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 289-289
Author(s):  
Kimberly Davidson

289 Background: One of the more challenging aspects of managing patients receiving chemotherapy is to reduce Emergency Room (ER) visits and ultimately hospital readmissions. Patients may not understand who or when to call with issues and may be concerned about reaching their physician or receiving a call back in a reasonable amount of time. Methods: C1/D1 calls were initiated with the Medical Oncology Care Coordinator (CC) staff in August 2017. All patients receiving a C1/D1 dose of a new treatment and change in regimen were called by the CC. During this call, the patient is asked several questions including how they are currently feeling, if they are having any issues as well as reviewing contact information and direction regarding if they have a fever. Re-education was provided to the staff in January 2018 regarding the importance of the calls. Also at this time, the CC were asked to do Nadir calls (repeat call 7-10 days after D1) for those patients who were determined to be high risk (percentage calculated using a toxicity formula). Results: Initially the % of ER visits were reduced after the C1/D1 calls were initiated but then began trending upward again. After re-education and the initiation of the Nadir calls, ER visits again trended down. Conclusions: Increased touch points with patients, including C1/D1 follow up calls, Nadir calls and toxicity checks for high risk patients contributed to a downward trend of treatment patients visiting the ER.[Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (14) ◽  
pp. 1233-1239
Author(s):  
Melissa E. Glassman ◽  
Rebekah Diamond ◽  
Sharon K. Won ◽  
Jasmyn Johal ◽  
Dana R. Sirota

Ensuring safe and timely follow-up after well baby nursery (WBN) discharge is an ongoing challenge. This study demonstrates the efficacy of a novel model for follow-up, the Newborn Clinic (NBC), in reducing time to outpatient follow-up after WBN discharge. Our retrospective chart review of 17 952 newborns found that time to follow-up visit decreased significantly following NBC establishment. Emergency department visits, a marker of infant morbidity, were slightly increased in the post-establishment cohort. There was no difference, however, in hospital readmissions. Analysis within the post-establishment cohort showed that newborns with jaundice, a high-risk group, were much more likely to have early follow-up if their visit was scheduled with NBC. Our study demonstrates that NBC is an effective model for decreasing time from WBN discharge to follow-up visit. It should be considered as an initiative to run concurrently with expedited newborn discharge initiatives so that safe follow-up need not be sacrificed.


2003 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 477-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cameron Lindsey ◽  
Maqual Graham ◽  
Julie McMurphy

The objective of this paper was (1) to assess compliance with the National Veterans Affairs Guidelines for the use of troglitazone and rosiglitazone and (2) to develop and implement a conversion protocol that allows effective management of patients receiving troglitazone. A retrospective chart review was conducted to assess adherence to guidelines for all patients receiving troglitazone and rosiglitazone at the medical center. Appropriateness of therapy through indication evaluation, safety through alanine aminotransferase (ALT) monitoring compliance, and efficacy through hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c) changes were used to assess adherence. According to National Veterans Affairs (VA) Guidelines, 68% of troglitazone and 63% of rosiglitazone patients had an appropriate indication for the use of these agents. Baseline ALT levels were obtained in 40% of troglitazone and 71% of rosiglitazone patients. Full compliance with continual ALT monitoring was seen in 6 and 54% of patients, respectively. Goal HbA1cwas achieved in 57 and 29% of patients, respectively. Of the 33 patients receiving troglitazone, 19 were converted to rosiglitazone therapy; 11 were maintained on current regimens without troglitazone, and 3 were lost to follow up. Adherence to guidelines needs to be reinforced, in particular, compliance with ALT monitoring. However, there were no reported cases of hepatotoxicity in the patients reviewed. Many patients did not achieve a HbA1c


2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah McKenna ◽  
Alexandra Cheung ◽  
Amanda Wolfe ◽  
Brenda L Coleman ◽  
Michael E Detsky ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBackground: Tumour lysis syndrome (TLS) occurs when lysis of malignant cells causes electrolyte disturbances and potentially organ dysfunction. Guidelines recommending preventive therapy according to TLS risk are based on low-quality evidence.Objectives: The primary objective was to characterize utilization of TLS preventive strategies through comprehensive description of current practice. Secondary objectives were to determine TLS incidence, to compare use of preventive strategies among intermediate- and high-risk patients, and to describe TLS treatment strategies.Methods: This retrospective chart review examined data for patients with newly diagnosed hematologic malignancy who were admitted to an oncology centre and/or affiliated intensive care unit between October 2015 and September 2016 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Results: Fifty-eight patients (29 at intermediate risk, 29 at high risk) were eligible for inclusion. Use of preventive allopurinol, IV bicarbonate, and furosemide was similar between groups. Rasburicase was more frequently used for high-risk patients (3% [1/29] of intermediate-risk patients versus 36% [9/25] of high-risk patients; p = 0.003). In 4 (14%) of the intermediate-risk patients and 2 (8%) of the high-risk patients, TLS developed during the admission. TLS was observed in 10% (1/10) of patients who received preventive rasburicase and 11% (5/44) of those who did not (p > 0.99), and in 9% (4/45) of patients who received preventive IV bicarbonate and 25% (2/8) of those who did not (p = 0.22). Treatment strategies included rasburicase, IV bicarbonate, furosemide, and renal replacement therapy.Conclusions: In this retrospective chart review, rasburicase was more commonly used for high-risk patients, whereas the use of other agents was similar between risk groups. This pattern of use is inconsistent with guidelines, which recommend that all high-risk patients receive rasburicase. There was no difference in TLS incidence between patients who did and did not receive preventive rasburicase or IV bicarbonate. Further prospective studies are needed to inform management of patients with malignancies who are at intermediate or high risk of TLS.RÉSUMÉContexte : Le syndrome de lyse tumorale (SLT) se produit lorsque la lyse de cellules malignes provoque des perturbations électrolytiques et la dysfonction potentielle d’un organe. Les lignes directrices préconisant une thérapie préventive basée sur le risque de SLT se fondent sur des éléments de preuve de piètre qualité.Objectifs : L’objectif principal consistait à décrire l’adoption des stratégies de prévention du SLT en décrivant précisément la pratique actuelle. Les objectifs secondaires consistaient, quant à eux, à déterminer l’incidence du SLT, à comparer l’utilisation des stratégies de prévention pour les patients présentant un risque élevé et moyen et à décrire les stratégies de traitement du SLT.Méthodes : Cet examen rétrospectif a permis d’examiner les données de patients ayant récemment reçu un diagnostic d’hémopathie maligne et ayant été admis dans un centre d’oncologie ou une unité de soins intensifs affiliée, entre octobre 2015 et septembre 2016 à Toronto (Ontario), au Canada.Résultats : Cinquante-huit patients (29 présentant un risque moyen et 29 un risque élevé) étaient admissibles. L’utilisation d’allopurinol à titre préventif, de bicarbonate par voie intraveineuse et de furosémide était similaire d’un groupe à l’autre. Le rasburicase était plus fréquemment utilisé pour les patients présentant un risque élevé (3 % [1/29] de patients présentant un risque moyen contre 36 % [9/25] de patients présentant un risque élevé; p = 0.003). Quatre (14 %) patients présentant un risque moyen et deux (8 %) présentant un risque élevé ont développé un SLT pendant l’admission. Le SLT a été observé chez 10 % (1/10) des patients ayant reçu du rasburicase à titre préventif et chez 11 % (5/44) des patients qui n’en avaient pas reçu (p > 0,99); il a aussi été observé chez 9 % (4/45) des patients ayant reçu du bicarbonate par voie intraveineuse à titre préventif et chez 25 % (2/8) des patients qui n’en avaient pas reçu (p = 0.22). Les stratégies de traitement comprenaient le rasburicase, le bicarbonate par voie intraveineuse, le furosémide et la thérapie de remplacement rénal.Conclusions : Dans cet examen rétrospectif des dossiers, l’usage du rasburicase était plus fréquent pour les patients présentant un risque élevé, tandis que celui d’autres agents était similaire entre les groupes à risque. Ce schéma d’utilisation n’est pas conforme aux lignes directrices, qui recommandent que tous les patients présentant un risque élevé reçoivent du rasburicase. Aucune différence n’est apparue dans l’incidence du SLT parmi les patients ayant reçu du rasburicase ou du bicarbonate par voie intraveineuse à titre préventif et parmi ceux qui n’en avaient pas reçu. Davantage d’études prospectives sont nécessaires pour mieux connaitre la gestion des patients à haut risque ou ceux qui présentent des risques moyens de SLT, mais qui ont des malignités.  


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison Kratka ◽  
Jodi Dalto ◽  
Jennifer Beloff ◽  
Hojjat Salmasian ◽  
Kathryn Britton

Introduction: The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) lowers Medicare payments to hospitals with excess readmissions for certain conditions. We analyzed FY2020 HRRP data for Brigham and Women’s Hospital (July 2015 to June 2018). We conducted an analysis to identify patients with a discrepant expected vs observed readmission status for AMI, HF and CABG, followed by a chart review to explain this discrepancy. Methods: We calculated the risk of readmission for each patient, which was a summed value of the weights associated with all recorded comorbidities in the CMS data. A negative risk score indicated a patient was unlikely to be readmitted and a positive score indicated the opposite. We then performed a chart review focused on patients who had a high risk of readmission but were not readmitted, and those who had a low risk of readmission but were readmitted. Results: For AMI, 18% (108/596) of patients were readmitted within 30 days, CABG 14% (50/357) of patients, and HF 27% (367/1382) of patients. For AMI, risk of readmission scores ranged from 2.75 to -0.095. 5/596 patients had a negative score, and none were readmitted. For CABG, scores ranged from 2.64 to -0.31, 58/357 people had a negative score, and 6 were readmitted. For HF, scores ranged from 1.94 to 0.055. There were no negative scores, but of the lowest 20/1382 scores, 2 were readmitted. We then performed a chart review of 37 patients whose readmission status was discordant with their risk score, and examined why this occurred. For patients who were low risk but were readmitted across all three conditions, 30% (range 10% - 54%) did not have a follow up appointment scheduled before discharge, 11% (range 0% - 29%) did not have an advanced care plan and 95% (range 86% - 100%) had not had a SIC. Patients who were high risk but not readmitted were evaluated but did not have any notable characteristics. We did not find any evidence of under-coding of risk comorbidities that would have led to falsely low risk scores. Conclusions: Patients with more comorbidities were more likely to get readmitted, and we found these risk factors to be accurately recorded. Clinical care insights from this project include the need for more SICs and palliative care consults and a more targeted effort to ensure patients have appropriate follow-up.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S171-S171
Author(s):  
Ryan Zabrosky ◽  
Ellen C Rubin ◽  
Erica Liu ◽  
Karrine Brade ◽  
Hope Serafin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Providing effective transitions-of-care (TOC) services improves outcomes for patients discharged on high-risk medications. Literature has shown that successful TOC for certain antimicrobials reduces hospital readmissions, medication errors, and improves post-discharge follow-up and laboratory monitoring. Prior to this quality improvement (QI) initiative, there was no formal TOC process for patients discharged on high-risk antimicrobial therapy (HAT) at our institution. Without standardization, only 55.1% of patients discharged on HAT had successful TOC. The aim of this initiative was to develop and implement a TOC protocol in at least 90% of patients discharged on HAT. Methods This QI initiative utilized the Institute of Healthcare Improvement model for improvement. A workgroup of key stakeholders developed a protocol to identify and standardize TOC services provided to patients discharged on HAT. Successful protocol completion was achieved if the following process metrics were evaluated, obtained, and documented prior to discharge: baseline laboratory values, pharmacokinetic monitoring, appropriate intravenous access, drug-drug interactions, medication availability, discharge medication counseling, and formal pharmacist documentation in a discharge note. Outcome metrics included referral to outpatient infectious disease (ID) follow-up, 90-day readmissions, and successful TOC. Balancing metrics included pharmacist time and protocol initiation for patients not discharged on HAT. Results Between October 2020 and May 2021, 218 patients met protocol inclusion criteria. Of these, 203/218 (93.1%) were appropriately identified with the new TOC process. The protocol was successfully followed in 78.9% of patients identified. Readmission rates were 42.8%, which was unchanged from baseline. Inpatient ID involvement increased from 80.9% to 95.7% and referral to outpatient ID follow-up from 59% to 94.8%. Conclusion This newly developed TOC protocol successfully identifies patients discharged on HAT, improves provision of TOC services to these high-risk patients, and significantly improves the rate of infectious disease involvement while inpatient and after discharge. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document