scholarly journals The role of PARP inhibitors in BRCA mutated pancreatic cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628482110148
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Chi ◽  
Su Yun Chung ◽  
Ruwan Parakrama ◽  
Fatima Fayyaz ◽  
Jyothi Jose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
The United States ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Tumor Cell Death ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
The Us

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) accounts for about 3% of all cancers in the United States and about 7% of all cancer deaths. Despite the lower prevalence relative to other solid tumors, it is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in the US. PDAC is highly resistant to chemotherapy as well as radiation therapy. Current standard-of-care chemotherapeutic regimens provide transient disease control but eventually tumors develop chemoresistance. Tumors that are deficient in DNA damage repair mechanisms such as BRCA mutants respond better to platinum-based chemotherapies. However, these tumor cells can utilize the poly adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP) as a salvage DNA repair pathway to prolong survival. Hence, in the presence of BRCA mutations, the inhibition of the PARP pathway can lead to tumor cell death. This provides the rationale for using PARP inhibitors in patients with BRCA mutated PDAC. The phase III POLO trial showed a near doubling of progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo in advanced PDAC when a PARP inhibitor, olaparib, was used as maintenance therapy. As a result, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved olaparib as a maintenance treatment for germline BRCA mutated advanced PDAC that has not progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy. The success of olaparib in treating advanced PDAC opened the new field for utilizing PARP inhibitors in patients with DNA damage repair (DDR) gene defects. Currently, many clinical trials with various PARP inhibitors are ongoing either as monotherapy or in combination with other agents. In addition to germline/somatic BRCA mutations, some trials are enrolling patients with defects in other DDR genes such as ATM, PALB2, and CHEK2. With many ongoing PARP inhibitor trials, it is hopeful that the management of PDAC will continuously evolve and eventually lead to improved patient outcomes.

scholarly journals A Review on DNA Repair Inhibition by PARP Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy

Folia Medica ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish P. Shah ◽  
Chhagan N. Patel ◽  
Dipen K. Sureja ◽  
Kirtan P. Sanghavi
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Cancer Therapy ◽  
Repair Process ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Development Of Resistance ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Future Therapy

AbstractThe DNA repair process protects the cells from DNA damaging agent by multiple pathways. Majority of the cancer therapy cause DNA damage which leads to apoptosis. The cell has natural ability to repair this damage which ultimately leads to development of resistance of drugs. The key enzymes involved in DNA repair process are poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARP). Tumor cells repair their defective gene via defective homologues recombination (HR) in the presence of enzyme PARP. PARP inhibitors inhibit the enzyme poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) which lead to apoptosis of cancer cells. Current clinical data shows the role of PARP inhibitors is not restricted to BRCA mutations but also effective in HR dysfunctions related tumors. Therefore, investigation in this area could be very helpful for future therapy of cancer. This review gives detail information on the role of PARP in DNA damage repair, the role of PARP inhibitors and chemistry of currently available PARP inhibitors.

scholarly journals Antitumor Activity of a Novel Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor AIU2001 Due to Abrogation of the DNA Damage Repair in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (19) ◽  
pp. 4728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hwani Ryu ◽  
Hyun-Kyung Choi ◽  
Hyo Jeong Kim ◽  
Ah-Young Kim ◽  
Jie-Young Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Small Molecule ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Repair Genes

Class III receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitors targeting mainly FLT3 or c-KIT have not been well studied in lung cancer. To identify a small molecule potentially targeting class III RTK, we synthesized novel small molecule compounds and identified 5-(4-bromophenyl)-N-(naphthalen-1-yl) oxazol-2-amine (AIU2001) as a novel class III RKT inhibitor. In an in vitro kinase profiling assay, AIU2001 inhibited the activities of FLT3, mutated FLT3, FLT4, and c-KIT of class III RTK, and the proliferation of NSCLC cells in vitro and in vivo. AIU2001 induced DNA damage, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase. Furthermore, AIU2001 suppressed the DNA damage repair genes, resulting in the ‘BRCAness’/‘DNA-PKness’ phenotype. The mRNA expression level of STAT5 was downregulated by AIU2001 treatment and knockdown of STAT5 inhibited the DNA repair genes. Our results show that compared to either drug alone, the combination of AIU2001 with a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib or irradiation showed synergistic efficacy in H1299 and A549 cells. Hence, our findings demonstrate that AIU2001 is a candidate therapeutic agent for NSCLC and combination therapies with AIU2001 and a PARP inhibitor or radiotherapy may be used to increase the therapeutic efficacy of AIU2001 due to inhibition of DNA damage repair.

Retrospective analysis of patients using olaparib (O) in pancreatic cancer (PC).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 389-389
Author(s):  
Erkut Hasan Borazanci ◽  
Carol Guarnieri ◽  
Susan Haag ◽  
Ronald Lee Korn ◽  
Courtney Edwards Snyder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Brca2 Mutation ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Repair Deficiency

389 Background: Molecular analysis has revealed four subtypes of PC giving clinicians further insight into treating this deadly disease. One subtype that was elucidated termed “unstable” is significant for the presence of DNA damage repair deficiency and can be targeted therapeutically. One such therapy, O, from the drug class poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, has already been FDA approved for individuals with BRCA mutated ovarian cancers. We performed a retrospective analysis on patients with PC treated at a single institution who have DNA damage repair deficiency mutations and have been treated with O. Methods: A chart review identified pancreatic cancer patients with DNA repair pathway mutations who were treated with O. The primary objective examined ORR in patients with PC with DNA repair mutations receiving O. Secondary objectives included tolerability, overall survival (OS), CA 19-9 change, and changes in quantitative textural analysis (QTA) on CT. Results: 11 individuals were identified, 5 carriers of a pathogenic germline (g) BRCA2 mutation, 1 carrier of a pathogenic g ATM mutation, 1 carrier of a pathogenic g BRCA1 mutation. Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) included 1 g ATM mutation, 1 g PALB2 mutation, 1 somatic (s) C11orf30 mutation, and 1 s BRCA2 mutation. Median age at diagnosis was 59, with 4 M and 7 F. No patients met criteria for familial PC and 7 had a family history consistent for breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. All individuals had metastatic PC and had progressed on at least 1 line of systemic therapy. ORR was 18%. Median time of therapy on O was 5 months (mo) (Range 1.4 to 29.567 mo) with 5 of the individuals still undergoing treatment at the time of analysis. Mean OS was 12.35 mo, 9 of the 11 individuals still alive. QTA of baseline CTs from subjects with liver (8/11) and pancreatic tumors (7/11) revealed a strong association between lesion texture and OS (Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC): hepatic mets = 0.952, p = 0.0003) and time on O (PCC: panc lesions = 0.889, p = 0.006). Conclusions: In individuals with metastatic PC with mutations involved in DNA repair, O may provide clinical benefit. QTA of individual tumors may allow for additional information that predicts outcomes to PARP inhibitors in this population.

EGFR amplification predicted selective sensitivity to PARP inhibitors with high PARP-DNA trapping potential in human GBM.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2047-2047
Author(s):  
W. K. Alfred Yung ◽  
Shaofang Wu ◽  
Feng Gao ◽  
Siyuan Zheng ◽  
Jie Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Glioma Stem Cells ◽  
Egfr Amplification ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Selective Sensitivity ◽  
Dna Trapping

2047 Background: Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) is an enzyme critical for regulating a variety of DNA damage repair mechanisms such as BER/SSBR, and PARP inhibitors have been shown to have single agent activity in breast and ovarian cancer patients with BRCA ½ mutations. However, PARP inhibitor such as veliparib has limited single agent activity in GBM and identifying markers predicting sensitivity is critical to select individuals or certain groups of patients for PARP inhibitor therapy. Methods: Potency and selectivity of PARP inhibitors were analyzed in a panel of glioma stem cells (GSCs) with varying genetic background. In vivo anti-tumor activity was evaluated in xenograft models. Results: In this study, we report that PARP inhibitor, talazoparib, showed strong single-agent cytotoxicity and remarkable selective activity in glioma stem cells (GSCs). This single agent activity was strongly correlated with EGFR amplification. GSCs with EGFR amplification (which occurs in about 45% of GBMs) showed higher oxidative base damage, DNA breaks, and genomic instability than non-amplified GSCs. To sustain the elevated basal oxidative stress, EGFR-amplified GSCs had increased basal expression of DNA repair proteins. As a result of blocked DNA damage repair by talazoparib treatment, DNA damage accumulated and lead to increased PARP-DNA complexes, which was then trapped by talazoparib and resulted in high toxicity. The PARP-DNA trapping function of PARPi is essential as olaparib and veliparib, two PARP inhibitors with weak DNA-PARP trapping potential did not show sensitivity in GSCs. In contrast, Pamiparib, another PARP inhibitor with similar PARP-DNA trapping ability to that of talazoparib, showed selective sensitivity in EGFR-amplified GSC. Conclusions: Our data showed that EGFR amplified GSCs with higher basal DNA damage exhibited therapeutic vulnerability to PARP inhibitors with high PARP-DNA trapping ability, and that EGFR amplification is a potential selection or predictive biomarker for PARP inhibitor therapy in GBM.

scholarly journals DAXX, as a Tumor Suppressor, Impacts DNA Damage Repair and Sensitizes BRCA-Proficient TNBC Cells to PARP Inhibitors

Neoplasia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 533-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaqin Shi ◽  
Juan Jin ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Wenfei Ji ◽  
Xiaoxiang Guan
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Damage Repair

scholarly journals Targeted DNA Damage Repair CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Screen Identifies Novel Classification of Poly-ADP Ribose Polymerase Inhibitors Based on Key Base Excision Repair Proteins

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory A. Breuer ◽  
Jonathan Bezney ◽  
Nathan R. Fons ◽  
Ranjini K. Sundaram ◽  
Wanjuan Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Base Excision

ABSTRACTDNA repair deficiencies have become an increasingly promising target for novel therapeutics within the realm of clinical oncology. Recently, a number of inhibitors of Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases (PARPs) have received approval for the treatment of ovarian cancers with and without deleterious mutations in the homologous recombination proteins BRCA1 and BRCA2. Unfortunately, as over a hundred clinical trials are actively underway testing the utility of PARP inhibition across dozens of unique cancers, the mechanism of action for such inhibitors remains unclear. While many believe PARP trapping to be the most important determinant driving the cytotoxicity found in such inhibitors, clinically effective inhibitors exist which possess both strong and weak PARP-trapping qualities. Such results indicate that characterization of inhibitors as strong and weak trappers does not properly capture the intra-class characteristics of such small molecule inhibitors. Using a novel, targeted DNA damage repair and response (DDR) CRISPR/Cas9 screening library, we describe a new classification scheme for PARP inhibitors that revolves around sensitivity to key modulators of the base excision repair (BER) pathway, unrelated to trapping ability or catalytic inhibition of PARP. These findings demonstrate that inhibition of PARylation and induction of PARP trapping are not the only factors responsible for the clinical response of DDR-deficient cancers to PARP inhibition, and provide insight into the optimal choice of PARP inhibitor to be used in the setting of additional DNA repair deficiencies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document