scholarly journals Endovascular therapy in patients with large vessel occlusion due to cardioembolism versus large-artery atherosclerosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628642199901
Author(s):  
Meredeth Zotter ◽  
Eike I. Piechowiak ◽  
Rupashani Balasubramaniam ◽  
Rascha Von Martial ◽  
Kotryna Genceviciute ◽  
...  

Background and aims: To investigate whether stroke aetiology affects outcome in patients with acute ischaemic stroke who undergo endovascular therapy. Methods: We retrospectively analysed patients from the Bernese Stroke Centre Registry (January 2010–September 2018), with acute large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation due to cardioembolism or large-artery atherosclerosis, treated with endovascular therapy (±intravenous thrombolysis). Results: The study included 850 patients (median age 77.4 years, 49.3% female, 80.1% with cardioembolism). Compared with those with large-artery atherosclerosis, patients with cardioembolism were older, more often female, and more likely to have a history of hypercholesterolaemia, atrial fibrillation, current smoking (each p < 0.0001) and higher median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores on admission ( p = 0.030). They were more frequently treated with stent retrievers ( p = 0.007), but the median number of stent retriever attempts was lower ( p = 0.016) and fewer had permanent stent placements ( p ⩽ 0.004). Univariable analysis showed that patients with cardioembolism had worse 3-month survival [72.7% versus 84%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.51; p = 0.004] and modified Rankin scale (mRS) score shift ( p = 0.043) and higher rates of post-interventional heart failure (33.5% versus 18.5%, OR = 2.22; p < 0.0001), but better modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score shift ( p = 0.025). Excellent (mRS = 0–1) 3-month outcome, successful reperfusion (mTICI = 2b–3), symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and Updated Charlson Comorbidity Index were similar between groups. Propensity-matched analysis found no statistically significant difference in outcome between stroke aetiology groups. Stroke aetiology was not an independent predictor of favourable mRS score shift, but lower admission NIHSS score, younger age and independence pre-stroke were (each p < 0.0001). Stroke aetiology was not an independent predictor of heart failure, but older age, admission antithrombotics and dependence pre-stroke were (each ⩽0.027). Stroke aetiology was not an independent predictor of favourable mTICI score shift, but application of stent retriever and no permanent intracranial stent placement were (each ⩽0.044). Conclusion: We suggest prospective studies to further elucidate differences in reperfusion and outcome between patients with cardioembolism and large-artery atherosclerosis.

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 525-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amélie Carolina Hesse ◽  
Daniel Behme ◽  
André Kemmling ◽  
Antonia Zapf ◽  
Nils Große Hokamp ◽  
...  

Background and purposeThrombectomy has become the standard of care for acute ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. Aim of this study was to compare the radiological outcomes and time metrics of the various thrombectomy techniques.MethodsIn this retrospective, multicenter study we analysed the data of 450 patients with occlusion of the anterior circulation, treated in five high-volume center from 2013 to 2016. The treatment techniques were divided in three categories: first-pass use of a large-bore aspiration-catheter; first-pass use of a stent-retriever; and primary combined approach (PCA) of an aspiration-catheter and stent-retriever. Primary endpoints were successful reperfusion and groin to reperfusion time. Secondary endpoints were the number of attempts and occurrence of emboli in new territory (ENT). The primary analysis was based on the intention to treat groups (ITT).ResultsThe ITT-analysis showed significantly higher reperfusion rates, with 86% of successful reperfusion in the PCA-group compared with 73% in the aspiration group and 65% in the stent-retriever group. There was no significant difference in groin to reperfusion time regarding the used technique. The secondary analysis showed an impact of the technique on the number of attempts and the occurrence of ENTs. Lowest ENT rates and attempts were reported with the combined approach.ConclusionsThe combined first-pass deployment of a stent-retriever and an aspiration-catheter was the most effective technique for reperfusion of anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. Our results correlate with the latest single-centrere studies, reporting very high reperfusion rates with PCA variations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlena Schnieder ◽  
Anneki von Glasenapp ◽  
Amelie Hesse ◽  
Marios N. Psychogios ◽  
Mathias Bähr ◽  
...  

The impact of heart failure on outcome in stroke patients is not fully understood. There is evidence for an increased mortality and morbidity, but it remains uncertain whether thrombectomy in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation is less effective in patients with heart failure compared to patients without. Retrospectively, we analyzed echocardiographic data of all patients in our stroke database, who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (n=668) for the presence of heart failure. Furthermore, we collected baseline characteristics and neurological and neuroradiological parameters. In the analysis, 373 of the 668 patients of our stroke database underwent echocardiography. Of these 373 patients, 90 patients (24%) suffered from heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction measured by echocardiography according to the current guidelines. After adjustment for age, the Alberta stroke program early CT score (ASPECTS), and time from symptom onset to recanalization, the analysis revealed that thrombectomy in patients with heart failure and LVO is not associated with less favorable outcome measured by the modified Rankin Scale after 90 days (3 (0-6) vs. 3 (1-5); p=0.380). Moreover, we could not find a significant difference in mortality compared to patients without heart failure (11.0% vs. 7.4%; p=0.313).


Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi Bouslama ◽  
Diogo C Haussen ◽  
Jonathan A Grossberg ◽  
Seena Dehkharghani ◽  
Meredith Bowen ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: Different imaging paradigms have been used to select patients for endovascular therapy (ET) in large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS). We sought to determine whether CT perfusion (CTP) selection improves ET outcomes as compared to non-contrast CT (NCCT) alone. Methods: Review of a prospective single-center interventional database of consecutive patients between September 2010 and March 2016. Patients with anterior circulation strokes undergoing stent-retriever thrombectomy were categorized according to imaging selection: (1) CTP and (2) NCCT alone. Two separate analyses were performed: (1) Uni- and Multivariate analyses of the overall cohort and (2) Matched analysis based on age, baseline NIHSS, and glucose levels. Results: A total of 602 patients were included. CTP-selected patients (n=365; 61%) were younger (p=0.02) and had less comorbidities. On univariate analysis, CTP-selection was associated with higher rates of full reperfusion (mTICI-3, p<0.001), good outcomes (90-day mRS 0-2, p=0.005), lower mortality rates (p=0.005), and a favorable shift in the overall distribution of 90-day mRS (p<0.001) as compared with NCCT alone. The rates of any parenchymal hematoma were comparable between groups (p=0.671). Multivariate logistic regression showed that CTP was independently associated with mTICI-3 (OR=1.79 95%CI [1.27-2.53], p=0.001) and good outcomes (aOR=1.72 95%CI [1.10-2.67], p=0.017). In the matched case-control analysis (n=424 patients), CTP-selection was associated with a favorable shift in the distribution of 90-day mRS (p=0.016), lower 90-day mortality (p=0.02), higher rates of mTICI-3 reperfusion (p<0.001), and a trend towards higher rates of 90-day independence (p=0.06). There was an advantage in the ability of CTP to determine functional outcomes in patients presenting later than 6h (Akaike information criterion (AIC) 199.35 vs. 287.49 and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) 196.71 vs 283.27) and with an ASPECTS ≤7 (AIC 216.69 vs 334.96 and BIC 213.6 vs 329.94). Conclusion: CTP-based selection is associated with a favorable shift in functional outcomes in patients undergoing stent-retriever thrombectomy. Future prospective studies are warranted.


Author(s):  
Paul Yeung‐Lai‐Wah ◽  
Kunakorn Atchaneeyasakul ◽  
Kyle Sheu ◽  
Neal Rao ◽  
David Liebeskind ◽  
...  

Introduction : More than a third of large vessel occlusion ischemic strokes do not have clear etiology. Mechanical thrombectomy provides a method to retrieve stroke‐causing thrombi and potentially identifying the etiology. A systematic meta‐analysis is performed to determine if there is a histological difference in red blood cell (RBC) composition of thrombi after the etiology of the stroke is known. Methods : We performed a systematic search through PUBMED and EMBASE. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were identified in which the large vessel occlusion stroke‐causing thrombi histology and etiology of the stroke were determined as either large artery atherosclerotic (LAA), cardioembolic (CE) or cryptogenic. Studies that had the data available or extractable data were selected. Random‐effect models were used to compare the histological difference between each etiology. Results : From inception to August 2021, 4 studies (n = 1022) were used to compare CE vs LAA, 5 studies (n = 1247) were used to compare CE vs cryptogenic and 4 studies (n = 654) were used to compare LAA vs cryptogenic. There was no significant difference in the red blood cells vs white blood cells/fibrin/platelets component between the stroke origins of CE vs LAA (mean difference (MD) ‐1.87; 95% confidence internal [CI]: ‐16.51, 12.78), CE vs cryptogenic (MD 1.18; 95% CI: ‐1.49, 3.86) and LAA vs cryptogenic (MD 7.20; 95% CI: ‐3.93, 18.34). Conclusions : There was no significant gross histological difference between CE, LAA and cryptogenic stroke etiologies and of the large vessel occlusion stroke‐causing thrombi retrieved by mechanical thrombectomy. Further studies into biochemical or genetic markers may be needed to identify stroke etiology.


Author(s):  
Mohamed Shehabeldin ◽  
Brendan Eby ◽  
Adam N Wallace ◽  
Amber Salter ◽  
Arindam R Chatterjee ◽  
...  

Introduction : Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) are both standard of care treatments for acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) who are eligible for one or both treatments. IVT may result in early recanalization in some patients with LVO. The objective of this study is to analyze whether IVT influences pre‐thrombectomy clot lysis in LVO acute ischemic strokes. Methods : We reviewed prospectively collected data for all patients with LVO ischemic strokes who were transferred to the angiography suite with intention to perform EVT at a single comprehensive stroke center between January 2016 to December 2018. We identified subjects who showed partial or complete clot lysis vs no lysis based on the first angiographic picture of the occluded territory at the time of the initial vessel selection. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics. We compared key predictor variables between lysis and no lysis groups including baseline variables, effect of IVT, time from IVT to groin puncture, LVO location, final modified treatment in cerebral ischemia (mTICI) score and discharge Modified Rankin Scale (mRS). t‐test or Kruskal‐Wallis test for continuous variables and chi square test or Fisher’s Exact test for categorical variables. Results : Two hundred and fifty‐nine patients were included. Among these patients, 10.8% (28/259) showed partial or complete lysis of the clot vs 89.2% (231/259) with no lysis. Among these patients who showed clot lysis, 16/28 (57.1%) received IVT. The use of IVT did not show differences between both groups (p = 0.18). There were no differences in the baseline characteristics except for gender, which was the only variable significantly associated with clot lysis. Men had 2‐fold higher odds of spontaneous lysis compared to females (OR [95%CI]: 2.39 [1.01, 5.65], p = 0.04). There was significant difference in the final mTICI between both groups (p <0.001). Conclusions : Our study showed that IVT in a modern practice was not associated with pre‐thrombectomy lysis. Some patients had pre‐thrombectomy lysis despite not receiving IVT.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (16) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Pavis Laengvejkal ◽  
Doungporn Ruthirago ◽  
Parunyou Julayanont ◽  
Yazan Alderazi

For the past two decades, intravenous tissue plasminogenactivator (IV tPA) has been the gold standardtreatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) for patientspresenting to the hospital in the first 4.5 hours aftersymptom onset. However, in patients with AIS due tointracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO), IV tPA hasvery poor recanalization rates. This group of patientshas significantly worse outcomes than those withoutLVO. Endovascular therapy has evolved significantlysince the first trial in 1998. With the publication of recenttrials using modern stent-retriever devices andselection of patients with LVO, endovascular therapyhas become the standard of care for patients with themost severe ischemic strokes. In this article we outlinethe two decade evolution of this therapy.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (01) ◽  
pp. 25-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikram Huded ◽  
Romnesh De Souza ◽  
Rajesh Karalumangala Nagarajaiah ◽  
Syed Moeed Zafer ◽  
Rithesh Nair ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe management of acute ischemic stroke has undergone a sea of change with the introduction of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Current guidelines state that the window period for IVT using rTPA is 4.5 hours. The MERCI, Multi Merci, and Penumbra trials in which patients with acute ischemic stroke were treated using endovascular treatment demonstrated better recanalisation in patients having a large vessel occlusion. However, recently published data from the three large trials IMS 3, Synthesis Expansion, and MR rescue, which compared endovascular treatment with intravenous therapy, failed to demonstrate superiority of endovascular treatment over IVT. In these trials, stent retrievers were used in very few patients. We present our results from a tertiary care center in India where patients are treated using intravenous as well as endovascular modalities. Among the 53 patients with acute ischemic stroke treated between 2010 and 2012, 23 were treated with IVT and 30 with endovascular methods. Stent retriever was used in majority of the endovascular cases. Aims: To compare the outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with IVT versus those who were managed using endovascular therapy. To evaluate outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke with a large vessel occlusion in whom endovascular modalities were used and to compare them with those of patients who were treated with IVT in presence of a large vessel occlusion. Settings and Design: Data of patients who underwent thrombolysis at our centre was collected over a 3-year period, that is, from 2010 to 2012. Endovascular treatment was done by an interventional neurologist. Materials and Methods: Data of patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent IVT or endovascular treatment at our centre between 2010 and 2012 was analyzed. Parameters included age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) on admission, door to needle time, stroke subtype, modality of treatment, outcome based on modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score at 90 days follow up and mortality rates at 90 days. Statistical Analysis: Tabulated results were analysed using INSTAT Graphpad analyser. Data were analysed using paired and unpaired t-test, Chi-square test, and Fishers test as applicable. P value was considered significant when it was <0.05. Results: Upon comparison of the outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel disease treated with endovascular therapy with those treated with IVT, it was found that the former group had better outcomes. We also found that in spite of there being a significant difference in the NIHSS on admission and a significant difference in the door to needle time, the outcomes of patients treated using intravenous or endovascular therapy were similar. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates between intravenous and endovascular groups. Conclusions: IVT is currently the standard of care in the management of acute ischemic stroke. Endovascular treatment during the window period is reserved for those patients with contraindication to IVT. In this study, we found that patients with documented large vessel disease with no evidence of cross flow through Willisian collaterals benefit from endovascular treatment. We recommend that all patients of acute ischemic stroke, be subjected to a baseline angiogram either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to document vessel status. This will help in identifying patients who may benefit from early endovascular treatment, if they fail to improve with IVT. Further, large trials using stent retrievers are needed, to prove that endovascular treatment is superior to IVT, in presence of documented large vessel disease.


2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (6) ◽  
pp. 1949-1956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Hun Kang ◽  
Woong Yoon ◽  
Seul Kee Kim ◽  
Byung Hyun Baek ◽  
Yun Young Lee ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe optimal treatment strategy for patients with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) due to underlying severe intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare treatment outcomes from intracranial angioplasty with or without stenting and intraarterial infusion of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor in patients with ELVO due to severe ICAS, and to investigate predictors of outcome after endovascular therapy in such patients.METHODSA total of 140 consecutive patients with ELVO attributable to severe ICAS underwent endovascular therapy at two stroke centers (A and B). Intracranial angioplasty/stenting was primarily performed at center A and intraarterial infusion of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (tirofiban) at center B. Data from both centers were prospectively collected into a database and retrospectively analyzed.RESULTSOverall, successful reperfusion was achieved in 95% (133/140) of patients and a good outcome in 60% (84/140). The mortality rate was 7.9%. Symptomatic hemorrhage occurred in 1 patient. There were no significant differences in the rates of successful reperfusion, symptomatic hemorrhage, 3-month modified Rankin scale score 0–2, and mortality between the two centers. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the only independent predictor of good outcome was a history of previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) (odds ratio 0.254, 95% confidence interval 0.094–0.689, p = 0.007).CONCLUSIONSBoth intracranial angioplasty/stenting and intraarterial infusion of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor are effective and safe in the treatment of underlying severe ICAS in acute stroke patients with ELVO. In addition, a lack of a history of stroke/TIA was the only independent predictor of good outcome after endovascular therapy in such patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 1202-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Hun Kang ◽  
Woong Yoon ◽  
Byung Hyun Baek ◽  
Seul Kee Kim ◽  
Yun Young Lee ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe optimal front-line thrombectomy choice for primary recanalization of a target artery remains unknown for patients with acute large-vessel occlusion (LVO) and an underlying intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). The authors aimed to compare procedural characteristics and outcomes between patients who received a stent-retriever thrombectomy (SRT) and patients who received a contact aspiration thrombectomy (CAT), as the front-line approach for treating LVO due to severe underlying ICAS.METHODSOne hundred thirty patients who presented with acute LVO and underlying severe ICAS at the occlusion site were included. Procedural characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared between patients treated with front-line SRT (n = 70) and those treated with front-line CAT (n = 60). The primary outcomes were the rate of switching to an alternative thrombectomy technique, time from groin puncture to initial reperfusion, and duration of the procedure. Initial reperfusion was defined as revealing the underlying culprit stenosis with an antegrade flow after thrombectomy.RESULTSThe rate of switching to an alternative thrombectomy after failure of the front-line technique was significantly higher in the CAT group than in the SRT group (40% vs 4.3%; OR 2.543, 95% CI 1.893–3.417, p < 0.001). The median time from puncture to initial reperfusion (17 vs 31 minutes, p < 0.001) and procedure duration (39 vs 75.5 minutes, p < 0.001) were significantly shorter in the SRT group than in the CAT group. In the binary logistic regression analysis, a longer time from puncture to initial reperfusion was an independent predictor of a 90-day poor (modified Rankin Scale score 3–6) functional outcome (per 1-minute increase; OR 1.029, 95% CI 1.008–1.050, p = 0.006).CONCLUSIONSThe authors’ results suggest that SRT may be more effective than CAT for identifying underlying culprit stenosis and therefore considered the optimal front-line thrombectomy technique in acute stroke patients with LVO and severe underlying ICAS.


2021 ◽  
pp. 174749302110125
Author(s):  
Mingming Zha ◽  
Qingwen Yang ◽  
Shuo Liu ◽  
Min Wu ◽  
Kangmo Huang ◽  
...  

Background There is an ongoing debate on the off-hour effect on endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO). Aims This meta-analysis aimed to compare time metrics and clinical outcomes of acute LVO patients who presented/were treated during off-hour with those during working hours. Summary of review Structured searches on the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted through February 23rd, 2021. The primary outcomes were onset to door, door to imaging, door to puncture, puncture to recanalization, procedural time, successful recanalization, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH), mortality in hospital, good prognosis (90-day modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-2), and 90-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were imaging to puncture, onset to puncture, onset to recanalization, door to recanalization time, mRS 0-2 at discharge, and consecutive 90-day mRS score. The odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of the outcomes were calculated using random-effect models. Heterogenicity and publication bias were analyzed. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted as appropriate. Nineteen studies published between 2014 and 2021 with a total of 14185 patients were eligible for quantitative synthesis. Patients in the off-hour group were significantly younger than those in the on-hour group and with comparable stroke severity and intravenous thrombolysis rate. The off-hour group had longer onset to door (WMD [95%CI], 12.83 [1.84-23.82] min), door to puncture (WMD [95%CI], 11.45 [5.93-16.97] min), imaging to puncture (WMD [95%CI], 10.39 [4.61-16.17] min), onset to puncture (WMD [95%CI], 25.30 [13.11-37.50] min), onset to recanalization (WMD [95%CI], 25.16 [10.28-40.04] min), and door to recanalization (WMD [95%CI], 18.02 [10.01-26.03] min) time. Significantly lower successful recanalization rate (OR [95%CI], 0.85 [0.76-0.95]; P=0.004; I2=0%) was detected in the off-hour group. No significant difference was noted regarding SICH and prognosis. But a trend towards lower OR of good prognosis was witnessed in the off-hour group (OR [95%CI], 0.92 [0.84-1.01]; P=0.084; I2=0%). Conclusions Patients who presented/were treated during off-hour were associated with excessive delays before the initiation of EVT, lower successful reperfusion rate, and a trend towards worse prognosis when compared with working hours. Optimizing the workflows of EVT during off-hour is needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document