scholarly journals Olaparib as maintenance treatment for patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591984975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan A. Ledermann ◽  
Eric Pujade-Lauraine
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
European Medicines Agency ◽  
Clinical Safety ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Repair Deficiency ◽  
Recombination Repair ◽  
Term Tolerability

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors were developed with the intention of treating patients with homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD), specifically for patients with tumours that harbour a BRCA mutation (BRCAm). Evidence from clinical trials to date has demonstrated that patients with a BRCAm derive the greatest benefit from PARP inhibitors. However, clinical studies have also shown that PARP inhibitors provide benefit to women with ovarian cancer who do not have a BRCAm. The recent updated approvals of olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of all platinum-sensitive relapsed (PSR) ovarian-cancer populations, regardless of their BRCAm status, support this. Long-term tolerability and efficacy of olaparib have been demonstrated in patients both with and without a BRCAm, with 13% of patients receiving maintenance olaparib for at least 5 years in one study, which is unprecedented in the relapsed ovarian-cancer setting ( versus 1% on placebo). Further studies should be performed to elucidate which non-BRCAm patients are deriving benefit and what molecular processes are enabling this, so that patients continue to receive optimal treatment for their disease. Here, we review clinical and molecular markers of HRD, the long-term clinical safety and efficacy of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer, with a focus on olaparib and the current approved indications for PARP inhibitors, as well as guidance on treatment decisions for patients with PSR ovarian cancer.

Decision analysis for secondline maintenance treatment of platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: a review

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 684-694
Author(s):  
Rebecca Arend ◽  
Shannon Neville Westin ◽  
Robert L Coleman
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Homologous Recombination Repair ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Recombination Repair

Most women with ovarian cancer experience disease relapse, presenting numerous treatment challenges for clinicians. Maintenance therapy in the relapsed setting aims to extend the time taken for a cancer to progress, thus delaying the need for additional treatments. Four therapies are currently approved in the USA for secondline maintenance treatment of platinum sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer: one antivascular endothelial growth factor agent (bevacizumab) and three poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib). In addition to efficacy, maintenance therapies must have a good tolerability profile and no significant detrimental impact on quality of life, as patients who receive maintenance are generally free from cancer related symptoms. Data from key bevacizumab trials (OCEANS, NCT00434642; GOG-0213, NCT00565851; MITO16B, NCT01802749) and PARP inhibitor trials (Study 19, NCT00753545; SOLO2, NCT01874353; NOVA, NCT01847274; ARIEL3, NCT01968213) indicate that bevacizumab and the PARP inhibitors are effective in patients with platinum sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer but differ in their tolerability profiles. In addition, the efficacy of PARP inhibitors is dependent on the presence of homologous recombination repair deficiency, with patients with the deficiency experiencing greater responses from treatment compared with those who are homologous recombination repair proficient. Allowing for caveats of cross trial comparisons, we advise that clinicians account for the following points when choosing whether and when to administer a secondline maintenance treatment for a specific patient: presence of a homologous recombination repair deficient tumor; the patient’s baseline characteristics, such as platelet count and blood pressure; mode of administration of therapy; and consideration of future treatment options for thirdline and later therapy.

Final overall survival (OS) results from SOLO2/ENGOT-ov21: A phase III trial assessing maintenance olaparib in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6002-6002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Poveda ◽  
Anne Floquet ◽  
Jonathan A. Ledermann ◽  
Rebecca Asher ◽  
Richard T. Penson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Long Term Treatment

6002 Background: SOLO2 (ENGOT ov-21; NCT01874353) showed that maintenance therapy with the PARP inhibitor olaparib in pts with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC) and a BRCA mutation (BRCAm) led to a statistically significant improvement in median progression-free survival (PFS) of 13.6 months vs placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.30). Time to second progression or death significantly improved (Pujade-Lauraine et al Lancet Oncol 2017) and a quality-adjusted PFS benefit was seen (Friedlander et al Lancet Oncol 2018) with maintenance olaparib vs placebo. We report the preplanned final OS analysis for SOLO2. Methods: Pts with PSROC and a BRCAm who had received ≥2 lines of treatment and were in response to their most recent platinum-based chemotherapy received maintenance olaparib (300 mg bid tablets) or placebo. Pts were stratified by response to previous chemotherapy (complete vs partial) and length of platinum-free interval (>6–12 months vs >12 months). OS was a secondary endpoint. The only preplanned OS sensitivity analysis was an OS analysis in the Myriad germline BRCAm subset (Myriad BRAC Analysis test). Results: At final data cut-off (Feb 3, 2020), median follow-up was 65 months in both treatment arms. A long-term treatment benefit was seen with olaparib vs placebo with an OS HR of 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54–1.00) in the full analysis set (FAS; unadjusted for crossover; 38.4% of placebo pts crossed over to a PARP inhibitor) (Table). At 5 years: by Kaplan-Meier estimates, 28.3% of pts in the olaparib arm vs 12.8% of pts in the placebo arm were alive and had still not received subsequent treatment; 42.1% of olaparib pts vs 33.2% of placebo pts were alive. The long-term tolerability profile of olaparib was generally consistent with that reported previously. Conclusions: In the final analysis of SOLO2, maintenance olaparib provided an unprecedented improvement of 12.9 months in median OS vs placebo. This is the first study with olaparib tablets, and the first since Study 19 (NCT00753545), to provide long-term follow-up and final OS data in pts with PSROC and a BRCAm. Clinical trial information: NCT01874353. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Long-term tolerability of olaparib tablets as maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSR OC): Phase III SOLO2 trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. viii340-viii341 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Korach ◽  
G. Freyer ◽  
S. Banerjee ◽  
R. Asher ◽  
J. Cosin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Term Tolerability

Laboratory cross-comparison of homologous recombination repair mutation analysis in tumor in a multicenter epithelial ovarian cancer series: The BORNEO GEICO 60-0 study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17550-e17550
Author(s):  
Ignacio Romero ◽  
Ana Oaknin ◽  
Zaida Garcia-Casado ◽  
Raul Marquez ◽  
Alfonso Yubero Esteban ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Homologous Recombination Repair ◽  
Recombination Repair ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
Uncertain Significance

e17550 Background: In epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), the identification of mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes on tumor is prognostic, predictive of response to PARP inhibitors, and a tool to identify individuals at genetic cancer risk. The aim of this study is to compare the concordance between two laboratories in identifying and classifying genetic variants in HRR genes. Methods: In a multicentre ambispective series of unselected, non mucinous EOC of all stages formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tumors were collected. These samples underwent the same mutational analysis of 15 HRR genes ( ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK1, CHEK2, FANCL, PALB2, PPP2R2A, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, RAD54L) in two different Laboratories (Lab1, Lab2) that used their own validated multi-gene NGS panels. Variant allele frequency (VAF) threshold was 5% for single nucleotide polymorphism and 10% for indels. Large rearrangements were not analyzed. Variants were classified into three categories based on ACMG criteria: non-mutated (class 1-2), Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS: class 3) and likely pathogenic/pathogenic (class 4-5). Results: A total of 81 cases were sent for the analysis. One had low DNA quality and therefore 80 cases were finally studied (85% high grade serous and 74% FIGO stage III-IV). Results reported by Lab1 and Lab2 (lab1/Lab2) were the following: 21/19 (26%/24%) cases had BRCA1/2 mutations, 7/8 (8.7%/10%) mutations on other HRR genes including two in ATM and RAD51D, one in CHEK1, CHEK2, and FANCL and one RAD51C reported in Lab2 only while the rest were either VUS 23/27 (29%/34%) or non-mutated 29/26 (36%/33%). Concordance between laboratories in classifying patients was 93.75% (kappa coefficient 0.86). Discrepancies (DC) on variants were classified into arbitrary categories, namely 0= complete concordance, category 1 meaning DC in detection assumed to be due to tumor heterogeneity (VAF nearby the threshold) or technique (1A), or caused by laboratories performance and avoidable (1B) and the category 2 identified DC in interpretation without clinical relevance (2A) or clinically relevant (2B), the results of total number of variants are shown in table. Overall, regarding clinically relevant DC in HRR genes, 9 DC in variants were observed including six 2B, two 1A and one 1B and they affect 5 (6.3%) patients since some were overlapping. Conclusions: In our EOC series the concordance of two Laboratories in the identification of clinically relevant HRR mutations on tumor is high but discrepancies in interpretation remain a challenge that needs further harmonization.[Table: see text]

Salvage radiation therapy for localized recurrent ovarian cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 916-921
Author(s):  
Alicia Smart ◽  
Yu-Hui Chen ◽  
Teresa Cheng ◽  
Martin King ◽  
Larissa Lee
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Salvage Radiotherapy ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Long Term Survivors ◽  
Disease Free

IntroductionTo evaluate clinical outcomes for patients with localized recurrent ovarian cancer treated with salvage radiotherapy.MethodsIn a retrospective single institutional analysis, we identified 40 patients who received salvage radiotherapy for localized ovarian cancer recurrence from January 1995 to June 2011. Recurrent disease was categorized as: pelvic peritoneal (45%, 18), extraperitoneal/nodal (35%, 14), or vaginal (20%, eight). Actuarial disease-free and overall survival estimates were calculated by Kaplan–Meier and prognostic factors evaluated by the Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsMedian follow-up was 42 months. Median patient age was 54 years (range, 27–78). Histologic subtypes were: serous (58%, 23), endometrioid (15%, six), clear cell (13%, five), mucinous (8%, three), and other (8%, three). At the time of salvage radiotherapy, surgical cytoreduction was performed in 60% (24) and 68% (27) had platinum-sensitive disease. Most patients (63%, 25) received salvage radiotherapy at the time of first recurrence. Relapse after salvage radiotherapy occurred in 29 patients at a median time of 16 months and was outside the radiotherapy field in 62%. 18 At 3 years, disease-free and overall survival rates were 18% and 80%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, non-serous histology (hazards ratio 0.3, 95% CI 0.1–0.7) and platinum-sensitivity (hazards ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.5) were associated with lower relapse risk. Platinum-sensitivity was also associated with overall survival (hazards ratio 0.4, 95% CI 0.1–1.0). Four patients (10%) were long-term survivors without recurrence 5 years after salvage radiotherapy. Of the five patients with clear cell histology, none experienced relapse at the time of last follow-up.DiscussionPatients with non-serous and/or platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer had the greatest benefit from salvage radiotherapy for localized recurrent disease. Although relapse was common, radiotherapy prolonged recurrence for > 1 year in most patients and four were long-term survivors.

scholarly journals First-line PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: summary of an ESMO Open - Cancer Horizons round-table discussion

ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. e001110
Author(s):  
Susana Banerjee ◽  
Antonio Gonzalez-Martin ◽  
Philipp Harter ◽  
Domenica Lorusso ◽  
Kathleen N Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Round Table ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
European Medicines Agency ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase Iii Trials

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor maintenance therapy is the latest breakthrough in the management of newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. The results of the SOLO-1 trial in 2018 led to European Medicines Agency and Food and Drug Administration approval of olaparib as first-line maintenance therapy in patients with BRCA1/2 mutation, establishing a new standard of care. Subsequently, the results of three phase III trials (PRIMA, PAOLA-1, VELIA) evaluating the use of first-line PARP inhibitors beyond patients with BRCA1/2 mutations and as combination strategies were presented in 2019, leading to the recent approval of maintenance niraparib irrespective of biomarker status and olaparib in combination with bevacizumab in homologous recombination deficiency-positive-associated advanced ovarian cancer. An ESMO Open - Cancer Horizons round-table expert panel discussed the four phase III trials of first-line PARP inhibitor therapy and how they are changing the clinical management of advanced ovarian cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document