scholarly journals Could tumor spread through air spaces benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I lung adenocarcinoma? A multi-institutional study

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592097814
Author(s):  
Donglai Chen ◽  
Xiaofan Wang ◽  
Fuquan Zhang ◽  
Ruoshuang Han ◽  
Qifeng Ding ◽  
...  

Background: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) remains unknown for patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) with spread through air spaces (STAS). This study investigated the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I ADC/STAS-positive patients. Methods: A total of 3346 patients with stage I ADC from five institutions in China were identified from 2009 to 2013, of whom 1082 were diagnosed with STAS (32.3%). By using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression model, we explored the impact of STAS on prognosis, and determined if the use of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved outcomes in patients with stage I ADC/STAS-positive. A validation cohort was also included in this study. Results: Patients with stage I ADC/STAS-positive in the primary cohort had unfavorable overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). A multivariate Cox regression model confirmed the survival disadvantages of STAS in patients with stage I ADC [OS: hazards ratio (HR) = 1.877, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.579–2.231; p < 0.001; DFS: HR = 1.895, 95% CI: 1.614–2.225; p < 0.001]. Lobectomy was associated with better OS and DFS than sublobar resection (SR) in both stage IA and IB ADC/STAS-positive. Similar results were observed in the validation cohort. For patients with stage IB ADC/STAS-positive, ACT was revealed as an independent factor for favorable survival (OS: HR = 0.604, 95% CI: 0.397–0.919; p = 0.018; DFS: HR = 0.565, 95% CI: 0.372–0.858; p = 0.007). However, among patients with stage IA ADC/STAS-positive, ACT was associated with improved outcomes only for those undergoing SR (OS: HR = 0.787, 95% CI: 0.359–0.949; p = 0.034; DFS: HR = 0.703, 95% CI: 0.330–0.904; p = 0.029). Conclusion: The presence of STAS was correlated with poor prognosis in patients with stage I ADC. Our study suggested that ACT might be considered for patients with stage IB ADC/STAS-positive and those with stage IA ADC/STAS-positive who underwent SR.

2018 ◽  
Vol 105 (6) ◽  
pp. 1655-1663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gouji Toyokawa ◽  
Yuichi Yamada ◽  
Tetsuzo Tagawa ◽  
Yuka Kozuma ◽  
Taichi Matsubara ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 139-139
Author(s):  
Deven Patel ◽  
Timothy DiPeri ◽  
Brian Cox ◽  
Andrew Eugene Hendifar ◽  
Arsen Osipov ◽  
...  

139 Background: Differences in embryological origin and tumor biology distinguish right-sided colon cancer (RCC) from left-sided colon cancer (LCC). Previous studies characterizing the prognostic impact of colon cancer laterality on clinical outcomes in non-metastatic colon cancer have been conflicting, thus closer examination is needed. Methods: Using the NCDB, patients with stage I-III colon cancer between 2004-2014 were stratified according to tumor location; RCC vs. LCC. Patient (pt) and tumor characteristics were compared in univariate analysis, survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Binomial logistic regression analysis was utilized to identify variables associated with colon cancer laterality. Results: Of the 342,735 pts who met inclusion criteria, 210,343 (61.4%) were diagnosed with RCC, and 132,392 (38.6%) with LCC. Pts with RCC were older (mean 71.6 vs. 66.4 years, p< 0.001) and predominantly female (65% vs. 35%, p< 0.001) compared to those with LCC. A trend towards poorer OS was seen in pts with RCC (mean 91.0 mos [95% CI: 90.2-91.8]) compared to LCC (112.2 mos [95% CI: 110.9-113.6]) in unadjusted analysis. On Cox multivariable adjusted analyses there was a significant but minimal impact on OS and laterality (hazard ratio or HR [LCC as ref] 0.978, 95% CI 0.967-0.989 p< 0.0001). Multiple unadjusted KM survival analyses showed RCC with T4 disease, high-grade, LVI/PNI, positive margins, N0-N2 disease, tumor deposits, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy had poorer OS than those features in LCC (all p < 0.0001). Binomial logistic regression showed RCCs were significantly more likely to be higher grade (odds ratio or OR 2.024) and MSI-H (OR 2.010) with trends (nonsignificant) towards more likely having N1-2 positive disease, LVI, less receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, and fewer tumor deposits. Conclusions: The impact of sidedness on prognosis in stage I-III colon cancer is complex. In this large, population-based study, RCC tends to be associated with more adverse prognostic features than LCC. More investigation into the biologic differences between RCC and LCC is warranted and how they impact phenotype and survival.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 789-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariam AlHilli ◽  
Sudha Amarnath ◽  
Paul Elson ◽  
Lisa Rybicki ◽  
Sean Dowdy

ObjectiveTo evaluate trends in use of radiation therapy and its impact on overall survival in low- and high-grade stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.MethodsPatients with stage I endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy from 2004 to 2013 were identified through the National Cancer Database and classified as: stage IA G1/2, stage IA G3, stage IB G1/2, and stage IB G3. Trends in use of vaginal brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy were assessed. Overall survival was measured from surgery and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The effect of radiation therapy on overall survival was assessed within each stage/grade group using Cox proportional hazards analysis in propensity-matched treatment groups.ResultsA total of 132 393 patients met inclusion criteria, and 81% of patients had stage IA and 19% had stage IB endometrial cancer. Adjuvant therapy was administered in 18% of patients: 52% received vaginal brachytherapy, 30% external beam radiation therapy, and 18% chemotherapy ±radiation therapy. External beam radiation therapy use decreased from 9% in 2004 to 4% in 2012, while vaginal brachytherapy use increased from 8% to 14%. Stage IA G1/2 patients did not benefit from either external beam radiation therapy or vaginal brachytherapy, while administration of vaginal brachytherapy improved overall survival in stage IB G1/2 compared with no treatment (p<0.0001). In stage IB G1/2 and stage IA G3, vaginal brachytherapy was superior to external beam radiation therapy (p=0.0004 and p=0.004, respectively). Stage IB G3 patients had improved overall survival with either vaginal brachytherapy or external beam radiation therapy versus no treatment but no difference in overall survival was seen between vaginal brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (p=0.94).ConclusionsThe delivery of adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with stage IA G1/2 endometrial carcinoma is not associated with improvement in overall survival. Patients with stage IB G1/2 and G3 as well as stage IA G3 are shown to benefit from improved overall survival when adjuvant radiation therapy is administered. These findings demonstrate potential opportunities to reduce both overtreatment and undertreatment in stage I endometrial cancer patients.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5069-5069
Author(s):  
E. G. Munro ◽  
N. Karnik Lee ◽  
M. K. Cheung ◽  
K. Osann ◽  
A. Husain ◽  
...  

5069 Background: To determine if extent of lymphadenectomy affects the survival of women with stage I ovarian cancer. Methods: Demographic and clinico-pathologic information were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program from 1988–2001 and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Of the 6,686 women diagnosed with stage I ovarian cancer, 4,092 (61.2%) had stage IA, 392 (5.9%) had stage IB, 1,840 (27.5%) had stage IC, and 362 (5.4%) had unspecified stage I disease. The median age was 53 (range: 1–99). 5,625 (84.1%) were White, 388 (5.8%) Black, 488 (7.3%) Asian, and 185 (2.8%) were Other. All patients underwent primary surgery; of which, 3,824 women had no nodes, 1,533 had <10 nodes, and 1,329 had ≥10 nodes resected. Of the patients who underwent a lymphadenectomy, the median number of nodes resected was 9 (range: 1–84). The extent of lymphadenectomy (0, <10, and ≥10 nodes) increased the survival of patients with stage IC disease from 72.8%, 86.7%, to 90.1% (p < 0.0001), but not in those with stage IA (p = 0.07) or stage IB (p = 0.04) disease. In patients with non-clear cell epithelial carcinoma, the extent of lymphadenectomy was associated with improved 5-year disease-specific survivals of 85.6%, 93.3%, and 93.5%, respectively (p < 0.0001). However, the benefit associated with an extensive lymphadenectomy was not evident in clear cell (p = 0.09), sarcoma (p = 0.33), germ cell (p = 0.55), or sex cord stromal tumors of the ovary (p = 0.99). Similarly, patients with grade 3 disease had an improved survival associated with the extent of lymph node resection, 74.4%, 87.5%, to 90.5% (p < 0.0001), but not in those with grade 1 (p = 0.18) or grade 2 (p = 0.27) disease. In multivariate analysis, a more extensive lymphadenectomy remained significant as an independent prognostic factor for improved survival after adjusting for all other independent prognostic factors including age, surgery, histology, stage, and grade. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the extent of lymphadenectomy was associated with an improvement in the survival of women with stage IC ovarian cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7045-7045 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Onishi ◽  
Y. Nagata ◽  
H. Shirato ◽  
K. Karasawa ◽  
K. Gomi ◽  
...  

7045 Background: With the increasing accuracy of localization for tumor-bearing areas using various new techniques, hypofractionated or single high-dose stereotactic irradiation (STI) has been actively investigated for stage I NSCLC in Japan. The current study retrospectively evaluated Japanese multi-institutional results for high-dose STI for stage I NSCLC. Methods: From 1993 to 2003, stereotactic three-dimensional treatment was performed using 3–10 non-coplanar dynamic arcs or 6–20 static ports for a total of 300 stage I (median age, 75 years; T1N0M0, n = 193; T2N0M0, n = 107) patients with primary NSCLC (adenocarcinoma, n = 138; squamous cell carcinoma, n = 129; and others, n = 33) in 14 institutions. Totally 190 patients were medically inoperable, and other 110 were medically operable but selected STI. A total dose of 18–75 Gy at the isocenter was administered in 1–22 fractions. Median calculated biological effective dose (BED) was 108 Gy (range, 57–180 Gy). Results: Median follow-up period of survivors was 38 months (range; 2–128 months). Pulmonary complications of NCI-CTC criteria (version 2.0) grade ≥ 3 were noted in 9 patients (3.0%). Local progression occurred in 44 patients (14.7%), and 5-year local control rate was high (86%) for BED ≥100 Gy (n = 227) compared to 67% for <100 Gy (n = 73) (P < 0.001). Overall 5-year survival rates of operable and inoperable patients were 65% and 37%, respectively. Overall 5-year survival rates in operable cases was high (74%) for BED ≥100 Gy (n = 85) compared to 37% for <100 Gy (n = 24) (P < 0.01). In a subset of operable patients irradiated with BED ≥100, 3-year locally progression-free survival rates was high (81%) for stage IA (n = 60) compared to 67% for stage IB (n = 23) (P < 0.05) Conclusions: Local control and survival rates of STI for stage I NSCLC are better with BED ≥100 Gy compared to <100 Gy. Survival rates in selected patients (medically operable, BED ≥100 Gy) were excellent, and potentially comparable to those of surgery. Stage IB patients displayed higher rate of local progression than stage IA. We have started multi-institutional prospective study for stage IA NSCLC with a schedule of total dose of 48 Gy in 4 fractions during 4–8 days. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7558-7558
Author(s):  
S. I. Ou ◽  
J. A. Zell ◽  
A. Ziogas ◽  
H. Anton-Culver

7558 Background: Platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy in randomized trials has failed to provide a survival benefit in stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Using data from California Cancer Registry (CCR), we explored factors that have detrimental effect on survival in stage I NSCLC to identify a subset of patients at high risk for relapse and subsequent mortality. Methods: 19,702 stage I NSCLC cases in the CCR from 1989 to 2003 were identified and subgrouped into stage IA & IB disease. Patient demographic factors, tumor characteristics and treatment delivered were examined. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated to estimate survival rates. Cox proportional hazards ratios were used to identify independent prognostic factors for survival. Results: Advanced age at diagnosis, male sex, low socioeconomic status (SES), non-surgical treatment & poorly-differentiated histologic grade (stage IA: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–1.19 & stage IB: HR = 1.11; 95% CI: 1.07–1.16) were factors identified with increased mortality risk on multivariate analysis. Non-upper lobe tumor location (RML/RLL/LLL) and tumor size ≥ 4 cm (vs < 4 cm; HR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.15–1.30) were additional factors with increased mortality risk among stage IB patients. Conversely, bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC)(vs adenocarcinoma: stage IA: HR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.72–0.91 & stage IB: HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.77–0.98) & Asian ethnicity (vs Caucasian: stage IA: HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70–0.94 & stage IB: HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72–0.90) were associated with decreased mortality risk in stage I NSCLC. Lobectomy had the lowest HRs for death among all surgical techniques for both stage IA & IB NSCLC in the Cox proportional hazards model. Conclusions: Poorly-differentiated stage IA & IB NSCLC and stage IB NSCLC located in non-upper lobes or tumor size ≥ 4 cm carried an increased mortality risk on adjusted analysis. No significant financial relationships to disclose. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document