Adverse events and near misses relating to information management in a hospital

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virpi Jylhä ◽  
David W Bates ◽  
Kaija Saranto
2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 395-397
Author(s):  
Eugene G. Breen

Aims and methodTo document the number and type of adverse medication events in a psychiatric sector service. Significant new adverse events were collated by the author and team over 30 months. Intervention to prevent any adverse event was enacted as soon as any were noticed or anticipated.ResultsThirty-six significant events occurred including three deaths and nine near misses. Corrective action was taken immediately any adverse event occurred. Inadequate communication between various hospital clinics, general practitioner practices, psychiatric clinics and pharmacies was the biggest avoidable cause of adverse events.Clinical implicationsAwareness of adverse drug events is essential in psychiatry. Clear, transparent pathways of prescribing are a key requirement to reduce avoidable adverse medication events. Psychopharmacology is a core module for psychiatric training.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Marcellino de Melo Lanzoni ◽  
Aliny Fernandes Goularte ◽  
Cintia Koerich ◽  
Emilene Reisdorfer ◽  
Marina Miotello ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Martinez ◽  
Lisa Soleymani Lehmann ◽  
Yue-Yung Hu ◽  
Sonali Parekh Desai ◽  
Jo Shapiro

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 151182
Author(s):  
Brian S. Carter ◽  
John D. Lantos
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 184 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Daniels ◽  
K. Hunc ◽  
D. D. Cochrane ◽  
R. Carr ◽  
N. T. Shaw ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 144-144
Author(s):  
Myrna Rita Nahas ◽  
Jessica A. Zerillo ◽  
Stephen A. Cannistra ◽  
Cheryle Totte

144 Background: Enhancing patient safety can prevent unintended outcomes arising from defects in healthcare delivery systems. The Hematology/Oncology Patient Safety Committee (HOPSC) at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) is a multidisciplinary team of healthcare providers that meets monthly to review inpatient and outpatient adverse events, near misses, and medical errors that impact patient safety. Methods: Our aim was to quantify and qualify the cases that the HOPSC has reviewed from 2012-2013. In order to identify trends in event reporting, we reviewed the number of events reported to the HOPSC in both the inpatient and outpatient settings. We further subdivided events into two categories: medication-related and non-medication related. Additionally, we delineated which healthcare provider initiated the reporting of each event. Results: Over the two-year period, a total number of 1,061 events were reported to the HOPSC. Of these, 259 were medication-related events. Of the events reported, 40 were by a physician/NP and 1,021 were by a nurse. There was a discrepancy in the type of event reported (24.4% medication vs. 75.6% non-medication related) as well as in the type of reporter (3.8% physician/NP vs. 96.2% nurse). Of all the events reported, 8 were escalated to the Department of Medicine Peer Review Committee. Conclusions: Through review of healthcare provider event reports, the HOPSC has identified several types of adverse events and near misses in the Hematology/Oncology division at BIDMC. The events are mostly reported by inpatient nurses and are primarily medication-related. Given this skewed reporting pattern, we will investigate the reasons why reporting by physicians, especially in the outpatient setting, is limited. Our reported outline of the HOPSC operations may also guide oncology practices elsewhere in their own development of patient safety peer review committees. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Xinyu Wang ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Fang Peng ◽  
Jingtai Lu

This study focuses on clinical pathways guided by evidence-based medicine (EBM). With the clinical pathway as the center, the subjective and objective medical knowledge of medical staff are collected, and a clinical pathway management system guided by EBM is established through a unified process; user demand analysis; main considerations; implementation, evaluation, and monitoring of the clinical path; and dictionary maintenance, to help hospitals fully regulate medical behaviors. Next, the study displays the path access prompt box, area 1 management page, table management page, exit prompt box, mutation record page, doctor order interface, revocation of execution, and monitoring interface, and the system designed is compared with the Beijing Shankang Technology (ASK) clinical data management system in terms of user experience. The results showed that the reporting rate of medical adverse events in the system in this study was 0.21%, and the work efficiency was increased by 14%. In terms of users’ satisfaction, the hospital managers’ satisfaction was 84 ± 5.36%, and it was 95 ± 4.72% for medical staff and 88 ± 4.91% for system administrators, superior to the ASK system; the differences were statistically significant ( P < 0.05 ). In conclusion, the clinical pathway information management system is in line with the working environment of medical staff, and the synchronous monitoring and management of medical quality are achieved through digital means, which can reduce the occurrence of medical adverse events and improve the work efficiency of medical staff.


2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 861-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leila Bernarda Donato Göttems ◽  
Maria do Livramento Gomes dos Santos ◽  
Paloma Aparecida Carvalho ◽  
Fábio Ferreira Amorim

Abstract OBJECTIVE Analyzing incidents reported in a public hospital in the Federal District, Brasilia, according to the characteristics and outcomes involving patients. METHOD A descriptive and retrospective study of incidents reported between January 2011 and September 2014. RESULTS 209 reported incidents were categorized as reportable occurrences (n = 22, 10.5%), near misses (n = 16, 7.7%); incident without injury (n = 4, 1.9%) and incident with injury (adverse events) (n = 167, 79.9%). The average age of patients was 44 years and the hospitalization time until the moment of the incident was on average 38.5 days. Nurses were the healthcare professionals who most reported the incidents (n = 55, 67%). No outcomes resulted in death. CONCLUSION Incidents related to blood/hemoderivatives, medical devices/equipment, patient injuries and intravenous medication/fluids were the most frequent. Standardizing the reporting processes and enhancing participation by professionals in managing incidents is recommended.


2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 254-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell MacDonald ◽  
Richard Yelle ◽  
Jo-Anne Oake-Vecchiato ◽  
Christian Melis ◽  
Blair L. Bigham
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document