Raising the safety bar: The hematology/oncology patient safety committee.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 144-144
Author(s):  
Myrna Rita Nahas ◽  
Jessica A. Zerillo ◽  
Stephen A. Cannistra ◽  
Cheryle Totte

144 Background: Enhancing patient safety can prevent unintended outcomes arising from defects in healthcare delivery systems. The Hematology/Oncology Patient Safety Committee (HOPSC) at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) is a multidisciplinary team of healthcare providers that meets monthly to review inpatient and outpatient adverse events, near misses, and medical errors that impact patient safety. Methods: Our aim was to quantify and qualify the cases that the HOPSC has reviewed from 2012-2013. In order to identify trends in event reporting, we reviewed the number of events reported to the HOPSC in both the inpatient and outpatient settings. We further subdivided events into two categories: medication-related and non-medication related. Additionally, we delineated which healthcare provider initiated the reporting of each event. Results: Over the two-year period, a total number of 1,061 events were reported to the HOPSC. Of these, 259 were medication-related events. Of the events reported, 40 were by a physician/NP and 1,021 were by a nurse. There was a discrepancy in the type of event reported (24.4% medication vs. 75.6% non-medication related) as well as in the type of reporter (3.8% physician/NP vs. 96.2% nurse). Of all the events reported, 8 were escalated to the Department of Medicine Peer Review Committee. Conclusions: Through review of healthcare provider event reports, the HOPSC has identified several types of adverse events and near misses in the Hematology/Oncology division at BIDMC. The events are mostly reported by inpatient nurses and are primarily medication-related. Given this skewed reporting pattern, we will investigate the reasons why reporting by physicians, especially in the outpatient setting, is limited. Our reported outline of the HOPSC operations may also guide oncology practices elsewhere in their own development of patient safety peer review committees. [Table: see text]

2021 ◽  
pp. 251604352199026
Author(s):  
Peter Isherwood ◽  
Patrick Waterson

Patient safety, staff moral and system performance are at the heart of healthcare delivery. Investigation of adverse outcomes is one strategy that enables organisations to learn and improve. Healthcare is now understood as a complex, possibly the most complex, socio-technological system. Despite this the use of a 20th century linear investigation model is still recommended for the investigation of adverse outcomes. In this review the authors use data gathered from the investigation of a real life healthcare near incident and apply three different methodologies to the analysis of this data. They compare both the methodologies themselves and the outputs generated. This illustrates how different methodologies generate different system level recommendations. The authors conclude that system based models generate the strongest barriers to improve future performance. Healthcare providers and their regulatory bodies need to embrace system based methodologies if they are to effectively learn from, and reduce future, adverse outcomes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Martinez ◽  
Lisa Soleymani Lehmann ◽  
Yue-Yung Hu ◽  
Sonali Parekh Desai ◽  
Jo Shapiro

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 480-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
SreyRam Kuy ◽  
Ramon A. L. Romero

The objective of this study was to determine whether rates of Critical Incident Tracking Network (CITN) patient safety adverse events change after implementation of crew resource management (CRM) training at a Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital. CRM training was conducted for all surgical staff at a VA hospital. Compliance with briefing and debriefing checklists was assessed for all operating room procedures. Tracking of adverse patient safety events utilizing the VA CITN events was performed. There was 100% adherence to performance of briefings and debriefings after initiation of CRM training. There were 3 CITN events in the year prior to implementation of CRM training; following CRM training, there have been zero CITN events. Following CRM training, CITN events were eliminated, and this has been sustained for 2.5 years. This is the first study to demonstrate the impact of CRM training on CITN events, specifically, in a VA medical center.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Ahmed Yahya Ayoub ◽  
Nezar Ahmed Salim ◽  
Belal Mohammad Hdaib ◽  
Nidal F Eshah

Background/Aims Unsafe medical practices lead to large numbers of injuries, disabilities and deaths each year worldwide. An understanding of safety culture in healthcare organisations is vital to improve practice and prevent adverse events from medical errors. This integrated literature review aimed to evaluate healthcare staff's perceptions of factors contributing to patient safety culture in their organisations. Methods A comprehensive in-depth review was conducted of studies associated with patient safety culture. Multiple electronic databases, such as PubMed, Wolters Kluwer Health, Karger, SAGE journal and Biomedical Central, were searched for relevant literature published between 2015 and 2020. The keywords ‘patient safety culture’, ‘patient safety’, ‘healthcare providers’, ‘adverse event’, ‘attitude’ and ‘perception’ were searched for. Results Overall, 18 articles met the inclusion criteria. Across all studies, staff highlighted several factors that need improvement to facilitate an effective patient safety culture, with most dimensions of patient safety culture lacking. In particular, staffing levels, open communication, feedback following an error and reporting of adverse events were perceived as lacking across the studies. Conclusion Many issues regarding patient safety culture were present across geographical locations and staff roles. It is crucial that healthcare managers and policymakers work towards an environment that focuses on organisational learning, rather than punishment, in regards to medical errors and adverse incidents. Teamwork between units, particularly during handovers, also requires improvement.


Author(s):  
Nebil Buyurgan ◽  
Paiman Farrokhvar

This chapter presents an investigation on supply-chain-related adverse events and patient safety in healthcare. Based on site visits and phone interviews with six healthcare providers, material handling and administrative processes are determined in a typical healthcare supply chain. Then a simulation model is developed to determine correct product validation practices and procedures for maximum patient safety. Benefits of standard product identifying technologies and automated validation systems are also explored to minimize workflow interruptions. Different scenarios are compared for patient safety, care delay, and system efficiency. The results show that validation points during PAR picking or bedside product administration, and warehouse picking operations provide optimal overall system performance. The results also indicate that standard product-identifying technologies and automated validation systems significantly impact the efficiency of supply chain.


2020 ◽  
pp. 135-157
Author(s):  
Stephanie Russ ◽  
Nick Sevdalis

This chapter offers an introduction to the recently developed applied health science fields of patient safety, improvement, and implementation sciences. Healthcare is a high-risk activity because of the complexity of its systems and processes. Errors arise frequently and these can impact negatively on patients by causing adverse events. Errors and adverse events are generally attributable to defective systems for organizing care, which create conditions in which errors arise. This represents a failure of risk management. Patient safety science takes a scientific approach to understanding why errors occur and how to prevent their occurrence or minimize their impact. Learning from analysis of patient safety incidents, through root-cause analysis, enables an organization or service to learn and avoid repeating similar failures in the future. Patient safety incidents represent one aspect of the wider problem of poor-quality care. Improvement science offers standardized tools and measurements that can be used to monitor and improve healthcare delivery. The Model for Improvement employs repeated Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA) cycles to quantify problems and to develop and test potential solutions. Engagement with stakeholders is an essential part of this process. Implementation science can contribute by providing methods to promote the uptake of new research evidence into healthcare practice. It can address the second translational gap by facilitating the widespread adoption of strategies for improving health-related processes and outcomes, and advancing knowledge on how best to replicate intervention effects from trials into real-world settings. These new scientific fields provide well-established approaches to addressing some of the key problems arising in healthcare. Modern public health needs to reap the benefits of these newly emerged sciences to address the burden of adverse events and harm that arises in the delivery of healthcare and to promote evidence-based practice.


2010 ◽  
Vol 92 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Pritchard ◽  
J Brackstone ◽  
J MacFie

The Chief Medical Officer's recent report, 'Making surgery safer', was a response to widespread concern about patient safety in the operating theatre. Annually there are an estimated 129,416 'untoward events' in the UK. These range from 'near misses' (NM), in which a patient is 'nearly harmed', to an 'adverse event' (AE), usually defined as 'an unintended injury or complication, including death'.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quinton Katler ◽  
Prachi Godiwala ◽  
Charles Macri ◽  
Beth Pineles ◽  
Gary Simon ◽  
...  

Objective. Our team created a knowledge, attitudes, and practice (KAP) survey in order to assess changes over time in healthcare provider and community member awareness of Zika virus symptoms, transmission, treatment, and current and future concerns. Study Design. The cross-sectional survey was issued at an academic medical center in Washington, DC, and via an online link to healthcare providers and community members between June and August 2016. Survey distribution was then repeated the following year, from March to April 2017. Outcomes were compared by survey year and healthcare provider versus community member status using SAS Program Version 9.4. Results. Significant differences in knowledge, attitudes, and practices existed between 2016 and 2017 survey time points. By 2017, more respondents had knowledge of various Zika virus infection characteristics; however healthcare provider knowledge also waned in certain areas. Attitudes towards Zika virus infection displayed an overall decreased concern by 2017. Practice trends by 2017 demonstrated fewer travel restrictions to Zika-endemic areas and increased mosquito protective measures within the US. Conclusions. Our results provide novel insight into the transformation of knowledge, attitudes, and practice of community members and healthcare providers regarding Zika virus since its declaration as a public health emergency of international concern in 2016.


Author(s):  
Nebil Buyurgan ◽  
Paiman Farrokhvar

This research investigates adverse events and patient safety in healthcare due to poor supply chain management practices, and inadequate and disorganized product validation procedures. Focusing on commodity medical and surgical products, this research investigates correct product validation points for maximum patient safety. This study also explores benefits of standard product identifying technologies such as HIBC or GS1 data standards as well as automated validation systems such as barcode or Auto ID to minimize workflow interruptions. Site visits and phone interviews are conducted with six healthcare providers to document common product validation practices and procedures. Based on observations and collected data, a simulation model is developed. Different scenarios are compared for patient safety, care delay, and system efficiency. The results show that validation points during PAR picking or bedside product administration, and warehouse picking operations provide optimal overall system performance. The results also indicate that standard product identifying technologies and automated validation systems significantly impact the efficiency of supply chain.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara G. Jericho ◽  
Rosalie F. Tassone ◽  
Nikki M. Centomani ◽  
Jennifer Clary ◽  
Crescent Turner ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Reporting and learning from events linked to patient harm and unsafe conditions is critical to improving patient safety. Programs that engage resident physicians in adverse event reporting can enhance patient safety and simultaneously address all 6 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies. Yet fewer than 60% of physicians know how to report adverse events and near misses, and fewer than 40% know what to report. Our study evaluated the effect of an educational intervention on anesthesiology residents' attitudes, knowledge, and skills related to adverse event reporting and the associated follow-up. Methods In a prospective study, anesthesiology residents participated in a training program focused on the importance of reporting methods and on reporting adverse events for patient safety. Quarterly adverse event reports were analyzed retrospectively for 2 years before the intervention and prospectively for 7 quarters after the intervention. Residents also completed a survey, before and 1 year after the intervention, that evaluated their attitudes, experience, and knowledge regarding adverse event reporting. Results After the intervention, the number of adverse event reports increased from 0 per quarter to almost 30 per quarter. We identified several categories of harm events, near misses, and unsafe conditions, including reports of disruptive providers. Of the harm events associated with invasive procedures, more than half were associated with lack of attending physician supervision. We also observed significant progress in the residents' ability to appropriately file a report, improved attitudes regarding the value of reporting and available emotional support, and a reduction in the perceived impediments to reporting. Conclusions An educational intervention increased the number of adverse event reports submitted by anesthesiology residents, improved their attitudes about the importance of reporting, and produced a source for learning opportunities and process improvements in the delivery of anesthesia care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document