The menopause specialist and breast cancer survivorship

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 147-154
Author(s):  
Jo Marsden
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Estrogen Deficiency ◽  
Treatment Result ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Lifestyle Risk ◽  
Improvement In Survival

Due to improvement in survival rates, breast cancer is the most prevalent female malignancy in Europe and hence the management of breast cancer survivorship is garnering significant attention. Most of the health issues associated with treatment result from iatrogenic estrogen deficiency and recognition of this in the recent National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) menopause guidance has resulted in the recommendation for referral of breast cancer patients to menopause specialists for appropriate counselling about and management of early menopause, estrogen deficiency symptoms and lifestyle risk modification. The latter has significant implications for both all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality. Extending the role of health professionals with an interest in menopause to provide such service for breast cancer patients is necessary as this is not within the remit or expertise of specialist breast cancer teams; however it will in turn, require menopause specialists to expand and regularly update their knowledge of breast cancer and its treatment.

scholarly journals Abnormal Long Non-Coding RNAs Expression Patterns Have the Potential Ability for Predicting Survival and Treatment Response in Breast Cancer

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 996
Author(s):  
Ana Carolina Pavanelli ◽  
Flavia Rotea Mangone ◽  
Luciana R. C. Barros ◽  
Juliana Machado-Rugolo ◽  
Vera L. Capelozzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
In Silico Analysis ◽  
Cancer Prognosis ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Non Coding Rnas

Abnormal long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) expression has been documented to have oncogene or tumor suppressor functions in the development and progression of cancer, emerging as promising independent biomarkers for molecular cancer stratification and patients’ prognosis. Examining the relationship between lncRNAs and the survival rates in malignancies creates new scenarios for precision medicine and targeted therapy. Breast cancer (BRCA) is a heterogeneous malignancy. Despite advances in its molecular classification, there are still gaps to explain in its multifaceted presentations and a substantial lack of biomarkers that can better predict patients’ prognosis in response to different therapeutic strategies. Here, we performed a re-analysis of gene expression data generated using cDNA microarrays in a previous study of our group, aiming to identify differentially expressed lncRNAs (DELncRNAs) with a potential predictive value for response to treatment with taxanes in breast cancer patients. Results revealed 157 DELncRNAs (90 up- and 67 down-regulated). We validated these new biomarkers as having prognostic and predictive value for breast cancer using in silico analysis in public databases. Data from TCGA showed that compared to normal tissue, MIAT was up-regulated, while KCNQ1OT1, LOC100270804, and FLJ10038 were down-regulated in breast tumor tissues. KCNQ1OT1, LOC100270804, and FLJ10038 median levels were found to be significantly higher in the luminal subtype. The ROC plotter platform results showed that reduced expression of these three DElncRNAs was associated with breast cancer patients who did not respond to taxane treatment. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that a lower expression of the selected lncRNAs was significantly associated with worse relapse-free survival (RFS) in breast cancer patients. Further validation of the expression of these DELncRNAs might be helpful to better tailor breast cancer prognosis and treatment.

Young Age is not an Ominous Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer Patients

1987 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Muscolino ◽  
Corrado Villani ◽  
Amedeo Vittorio Bedini ◽  
Alberto Luini ◽  
Bruno Salvadori
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Young Women ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Young Age ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Analysis of a series of 137 women 20–30 years of age, operated for breast carcinoma, excluding patients pregnant, lactating or with inflammatory cancer, showed that disease-free survival rates were similar and not lower than those reported for a large series of 716 breast cancer patients of all ages, treated and followed at the same Institute. Ten-year disease-free survival rates for the two series of 137 young women and 716 patients of all ages were 43.7% and 47.1% respectively. Even when considering the subgroups of patients with and without nodal axillary involvement, the corresponding figures for the two series considered were 72.6% vs. 72.1% (N−) and 25.1% vs. 24.5% (N+). It can be concluded that young age cannot be considered as an unfavorable prognostic factor.

Long-term survival rates of older breast cancer patients: Population-based estimates over three decades.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9051-9051
Author(s):  
B. Kanapuru ◽  
A. Jemal ◽  
C. S. Hesdorffer ◽  
W. B. Ershler ◽  
J. W. Yates
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

Breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III breast cancer patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11532-e11532
Author(s):  
Hee-Chul Shin ◽  
Wonshik Han ◽  
Hyeong-Gon Moon ◽  
Woo Kyung Moon ◽  
Seock-Ah Im ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii Breast Cancer

e11532 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is a reasonable option for operable breast cancer in terms of downsizing large tumor and increasing the rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, BCS in patients with large breast tumors down-staged by NCT remains still controversial because of the possibility of residual tumor and resistance to NCT. Aims of this study were to evaluate the long-term survival results of patients who received NCT and BCS compared to patients who received BCS first and to compare recurrence and survival rates between patients who received preplanned BCS and those who received down-staged BCS among patients who underwent NCT. Methods: Between 2000 and 2007, 70 patients with clinical stage III breast cancer who received BCS after NCT (NCT group) and 72 patients with clinical stage III breast cancer who underwent BCS first (Surgery group) were retrospectively reviewed. Among 70 patients received NCT, 45 patients (64.3%) received preplanned BCS (preplanned BCS group) and 25 patients (35.7%) received down-staged BCS (down-staged BCS group). The long-term results including ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), locoregional recurrence (LRR), disease recurrence and survival rates were compared with groups. Results: There was no significant difference in IBTR-free survival, LRR-free survival rates, disease-free survival and overall survival rates between the NCT and the Surgery group (p=0.971, p=0.294, p=0.863 and p=0.933, respectively). Among patients who received NCT, IBTR-free survival, LRR-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival rates was not also different between the preplanned BCS group and the down-staged BCS group (p=0.278, p=0.501, p=0.776 and p=0.412, respectively). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that patients who received BCS after NCT showed similar long-term resutls compared to patients who received BCS first in clinical stage III breast cancer patients. Also, down-staged BCS shows is oncologically as safe as preplanned BCS in clinical stage III breast cancer patients in terms of recurrence and survival.

Health after cancer: Early patient experience in a pilot survivorship clinic embedded in primary care.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 180-180
Author(s):  
Lidia Schapira ◽  
Marcy Winget ◽  
Siqi WU ◽  
Jennifer Kim ◽  
Cati Brown-Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Expert Knowledge ◽  
Primary Care Clinic ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Care Clinic

180 Background: Prior research has identified barriers to provision of quality survivorship care in primary care settings such as lack of expert knowledge and training, primary care burden and insufficient communication with oncologists. We implemented a survivorship clinic at an academic medical center in the primary care division with the goal of defining the elements required for a seamless transition and co-management. Methods: The primary care physician received training in cancer survivorship based on the ASCO Curriculum, shadowing of 3 breast medical oncologists and 1 gynecologic oncologist, attendance at the 2018 Cancer Survivorship Symposium and NCCN’s Cancer Survivorship Advocacy Meeting. Patients with breast and gynecologic cancers were referred by their oncologists or APP (PA or NP) at various points in their cancer trajectory. Clinical characteristics of patients were abstracted from the electronic medical record and in-depth interviews were conducted with 2 patients. Results: 41 patients attended the survivorship clinic. The majority (88%) were breast (63%) or gynecologic (24%) cancer survivors. Patient age was evenly distributed with 8 age < 46, 11 age 46-59, and 7 age > = 60. 23 (56%) patients had stage < 3 at diagnosis. 21 (51%) had been cancer-free for five years + and 4 were referred by their oncologist to help with patient co-management during cancer treatment. Of the 8 breast cancer patients < 46 years old, 6 had a genetic mutation and 7 were interested in fertility. 15/26 breast cancer patients are currently on endocrine therapy. Interviewed patients expressed appreciation for receiving whole-person care and knowing there is bidirectional communication between clinicians. Conclusions: Cancer survivors are open to and interested in a survivorship visit based in a primary care clinic; this includes both patients who have been cancer-free > 5 years as well as those recently treated with curative intent. Greater efforts are needed to train primary care physicians to deliver survivorship visits that are customized to meet the needs of cancer survivors.

scholarly journals Mammography correlates to better survival rates in breast cancer patients: a 20-year experience in a University health institution

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristóbal Maiz ◽  
Fernando Silva ◽  
Francisco Domínguez ◽  
Héctor Galindo ◽  
Mauricio Camus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Health Institution

scholarly journals Distinct Postsurgical Management in Young and Elderly Breast Cancer Patients Results in Equal Survival Rates

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (18) ◽  
pp. 7843-7847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebru Sen Oran ◽  
Yucel Yankol ◽  
Gursel Remzi Soybir ◽  
Tamer Karsidag ◽  
Onur Sakalli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

scholarly journals Stereotactic radiotherapy of breast cancer liver metastases

2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 382-390
Author(s):  
Sergei Tkachev ◽  
Sevil Alieva ◽  
Sergey Medvedev ◽  
Aleksei Nazarenko ◽  
Denis Romanov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Stereotactic Radiotherapy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Breast Cancer Metastases ◽  
Cancer Metastases ◽  
Breast Cancer Liver Metastases

Stereotactic body radiation therapy currently occupies its place in the complex treatment of cancer patients with liver metastases. It is assumed that certain groups of patients with breast cancer can benefit from the use of this method, which can be converted into improved overall survival and survival rates without signs of progression of the process. Purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer metastases in the liver. We have analyzed the results of using stereotactic radiotherapy in 25 breast cancer patients with 43 liver metastases. The treatment was carried out in 3 fractions with a fraction dose of 10-15 Gy and a total dose of 30-45 Gy. Growth of the irradiated lesions was recorded only in 1 case out of 43 metastases (2,3%) and 25 (4%) patients. 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates from the moment of stereotactic radiotherapy were 82,9%, 62% and 38,7%, respectively. Long-term post-radiation adverse events were observed in 8% of cases and did not have a significant effect on the quality of life and the possibility of antitumor treatment. So stereotactic radiotherapy can be recommended as a relatively safe and highly effective method of elimination of breast cancer liver metastases. Taking into account the high achieved local control, further studies on dose escalation in this group of patients are not required.  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document