scholarly journals Outcomes After Management of Subspine and Femoroacetabular Impingement Using a Direct Anterior Mini-Open Approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596712110557
Author(s):  
Liu-yang Xu ◽  
Kang-ming Chen ◽  
Jian-ping Peng ◽  
Jun-feng Zhu ◽  
Chao Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Decompression Surgery ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Meralgia Paresthetica ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Mini Open

Background: Subspine impingement (SSI) has been commonly managed with arthroscopic decompression. However, arthroscopic decompression is a demanding technique, as under- or over-resection of the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) could lead to inferior outcomes. An anterior mini-open approach has also been used in the management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), and it could provide adequate visualization of the anterior hip joint without a long learning curve. Purpose/Hypothesis: The objective of the current study was to compare the outcomes of SSI patients with FAI who underwent arthroscopic subspine decompression and osteoplasty with a group undergoing subspine decompression and osteoplasty using a modified direct anterior mini-open approach. It was hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in outcomes between the groups. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We reviewed the records of SSI patients who underwent decompression surgery (arthroscopic or mini-open) at our institution from June 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016. Both groups underwent the same postoperative rehabilitation protocol. Preoperative and 2-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes were compared using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), International Hip Outcome Tool–33 (iHOT–33), and Hip Outcome Score—Activities of Daily Living (HOS–ADL). Major and minor complications as well as reoperation rates were recorded. Results: Included were 47 patients (49 hips) who underwent subspine decompression using an anterior mini-open approach and 35 patients (35 hips) who underwent arthroscopic subspine decompression. There were no differences in demographic and radiological parameters between the groups, and patients in both groups showed significant improvement in all outcome scores at follow-up. The pre- to postoperative improvement in outcome scores was also similar between groups (mini-open vs arthroscopy: mHHS, 26.30 vs 27.04 [ P = .783]; iHOT–33, 35.76 vs 31.77 [ P = .064]; HOS–ADL, 26.09 vs 22.77 [ P = .146]). In the mini-open group, 10 of the 47 patients had temporary meralgia paresthetica, and fat liquefaction was found in 1 female patient. There were no reoperations in the mini-open group. Conclusion: Subspine decompression using the anterior mini-open approach had similar outcomes to arthroscopic decompression in the management of SSI. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve should be protected carefully during use of the anterior mini-open approach.

scholarly journals Acetabular Morphologic Characteristics Predict Early Conversion to Arthroplasty After Isolated Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 188-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian D. Giordano ◽  
Benjamin D. Kuhns ◽  
Itay Perets ◽  
Leslie Yuen ◽  
Benjamin G. Domb
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Preoperative Imaging ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Center Edge ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Outerbridge Grade ◽  
Tönnis Grade

Background: Hip arthroscopy in the setting of dysplasia and borderline dysplasia is controversial. Dysplasia severity is most often defined by the lateral center edge angle (LCEA) but can also be evaluated radiographically by the acetabular inclination (AI). Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to determine the effect of AI on outcomes after isolated hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). We hypothesized that patients with dysplasia would have higher rates of arthroplasty as well as inferior clinical and functional outcomes compared with patients who did not have dysplasia. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A hip arthroscopy registry was reviewed for participants undergoing arthroscopic correction of FAI from February 28, 2008, to June 10, 2013. Participants required a clinical diagnosis and isolated arthroscopic correction of FAI with preoperative imaging and intraoperative cartilage status recorded. AI dysplasia was defined as an AI greater than 10°, LCEA dysplasia as LCEA less than 18°, and borderline LCEA dysplasia as LCEA 18° to 25°. Patients without an acetabular deformity (LCEA 25°-40°; AI <10°) served as a control population. Postoperative variables included patient-reported outcome surveys with conversion to arthroplasty as the primary endpoint. Minimum 5-year outcome scores were obtained for 337 of 419 patients (80.4%) with an average follow-up of 75.2 ± 12.7 months. Results: This study included 419 patients: 9 (2%) with LCEA dysplasia, 42 (10%) with AI dysplasia, and 51 (12%) with borderline dysplasia. The AI but not LCEA was significantly correlated with lower outcome scores on the modified Harris Hip Score ( r = 0.13; P = .01), Non-Arthritic Hip Score ( r = 0.10; P = .04), and Hip Outcome Score–Sports Subscale ( r = 0.11; P = .04). A total of 58 patients (14%) underwent arthroplasty at 31 ± 20 months postoperatively. Patients with LCEA dysplasia had an arthroplasty rate of 56% (odds ratio, 8.4), whereas patients with AI dysplasia had an arthroplasty rate of 31% (odds ratio, 3.3), which was significantly greater than the rate for the nondysplastic cohort (13.5%; P < .0001). Patients with borderline LCEA dysplasia did not have increased rates of arthroplasty. A multivariate analysis found increasing age, increasing AI, Tönnis grade higher than 1, and femoral Outerbridge grade higher than 2 to be most predictive of conversion to arthroplasty. Conclusion: We found that an elevated AI, along with increasing age, Tönnis grade, and femoral Outerbridge grade significantly predict early conversion to arthroplasty after isolated hip arthroscopy. We recommend using the AI, in addition to the LCEA, in evaluating hip dysplasia before hip arthroscopy.

scholarly journals Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Athletes Undergoing Arthroscopic Correction of Sports-Related Femoroacetabular Impingement: The Percentage of Possible Improvement

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596711989474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Carton ◽  
David Filan
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Minimal Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Baseline Score ◽  
Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Ceiling Effects ◽  
The Impact

Background: Measures of clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported outcomes within orthopaedics are becoming a minimum requirement to establish the success of an intervention. Purpose: To (1) define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) at 2 years postoperatively in competitive athletes undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery for symptomatic, sports-related femoroacetabular impingement utilizing existing anchor- and distribution-based methods and (2) derive a measure of the MCID using the percentage of possible improvement (POPI) method and compare against existing techniques. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: There were 2 objective outcome measures—the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)—administered at baseline and 2 years postoperatively. External anchor questions were used to determine the MCID through mean change, mean difference, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) techniques. Distribution-based calculations consisted of 0.5 SD, effect size, and standard error of measurement techniques. The POPI was calculated alongside each technique as an achieved percentage change of maximum available improvement for each athlete relative to the individual baseline score. The impact of the preoperative baseline score on the MCID was assessed by assigning athletes to groups determined by baseline percentiles. Statistical analysis was performed, with P < .05 considered significant. Results: There were 576 athletes (96% male; mean age, 25.9 ± 5.7 years). The MCID score change (and POPI) for the mHHS and SF-36 ranged from 2.4 to 16.7 (21.6%-63.6%) and from 3.3 to 24.9 (22.1%-57.4%), respectively. The preoperative threshold value for achieving the ROC-determined MCID was 80.5 and 86.5 for the mHHS and 70.1 and 72.4 for the SF-36 for the patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) score– and POPI-calculated MCID, respectively. Through the commonly used mean change method, 40.0% (mHHS) and 42.4% (SF-36) of athletes were unable to achieve the MCID because of high baseline scores and PROM ceiling effects compared with 0% when the POPI technique was used. A highly significant difference for the overall MCID was observed between preoperative baseline percentile groups for the mHHS ( P = .014) and SF-36 ( P = .004) (improvement in points), while there was no significant difference between groups for either the mHHS ( P = .487) or SF-36 ( P = .417) using the POPI technique. Conclusion: The MCID defined by an absolute value of improvement was unable to account for postoperative progress in a large proportion of higher functioning athletes. The POPI technique negated associated ceiling effects, was unrestricted by the baseline score, and may be more appropriate in quantifying clinically important improvement.

scholarly journals Bilateral versus unilateral hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-232
Author(s):  
Claire E Fernandez ◽  
Allison M Morgan ◽  
Ujash Sheth ◽  
Vehniah K Tjong ◽  
Michael A Terry
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Study Patient ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract One in four patients presenting with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has bilateral symptoms, and despite excellent outcomes reported after arthroscopic treatment of FAI, there remains a paucity of data on the outcomes following bilateral hip arthroscopy. This systematic review aims to examine the outcomes following bilateral (either ‘simultaneous’ or ‘staged’) versus unilateral hip arthroscopy for FAI. A systematic review of multiple electronic databases was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and checklist. All studies comparing simultaneous, staged and/or unilateral hip arthroscopy for FAI were eligible for inclusion. Case series, case reports and reviews were excluded. All study, patient and hip-specific data were extracted and analyzed. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. A meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity among outcome measures. A total of six studies, including 722 patients (42.8% male) and 933 hips were eligible for inclusion. The mean age across patients was 35.5. The average time between staged procedures was 7.7 months. Four of the six studies were retrospective cohort studies, while the remaining two were prospective in nature. The overall quality of the eligible studies was found to be good. No significant difference was noted among patient-reported outcomes (modified Harris hip score, hip outcome score and non-arthritic hip score), visual analog scale, return to sport, traction time and complications between those undergoing bilateral (simultaneous or staged) versus unilateral hip arthroscopy. Based on the current available evidence, bilateral hip arthroscopy (whether simultaneous or staged) exhibits similar efficacy and safety when compared with unilateral hip arthroscopy. However, further prospective study is required to confirm this finding.

A comparison of mini-open and open approaches for resection of thoracolumbar intradural spinal tumors

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 758-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel C. Lu ◽  
Dean Chou ◽  
Praveen V. Mummaneni
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Spinal Tumors ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Score Improvement ◽  
Intradural Tumor ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mini Open

Object Standard approaches to thoracic intradural tumors often involve a large incision and significant tissue destruction. Minimally invasive techniques have been applied successfully for a variety of surgical decompression procedures but have been rarely used for the removal of intradural thoracolumbar tumors. In this paper, the authors compare the clinical outcome of mini-open resection of intradural thoracolumbar tumors with a standard open technique. Methods The authors retrospectively reviewed their series of 18 consecutive mini-open thoracolumbar, intradural, tumor resection cases and compared the outcomes with a profile-matched cohort of 9 cases of open intradural tumor resection. Operative statistics, functional outcome, and complications were compared. Results Tumors were removed successfully using both approaches, except for 1 case in the mini-open cohort in which only biopsy was performed for a diffusely infiltrating tumor (glioblastoma). There was no statistically significant difference in operative duration, American Spinal Injury Association scale score improvement, or back pain visual analog scale score improvement between groups. However, the mini-open group demonstrated a significantly lower estimated blood loss (153 vs 372 ml, respectively) and a significantly shorter length of hospitalization (4.9 vs 8.2 days, respectively). There was 1 complication of pseudomeningocele formation in the mini-open cohort and 1 complication of cerebral infarction in the open cohort. Mean follow-up length was 16 months in the mini-open group compared with 20 months in the open group. Conclusions The mini-open approach allows for adequate treatment of intradural thoracolumbar tumors with comparable outcomes to standard, open approaches. The mini-open approach is associated with less blood loss and a shorter length of stay compared with standard open surgery.

Combined Arthroscopic and Mini-Open Treatment of CAM-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler S Watters ◽  
Adam M Kaufman ◽  
John M Solic ◽  
Sandra S Stinnett
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Open Treatment ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mini Open

ABSTRACT Purpose Osteochondroplasty of the femoral head-neck junction can improve hip pain and function in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. We report our initial series of patients undergoing surgical treatment for symptomatic CAM type femoroacetabular impingement using a combined arthroscopic and mini-open approach. Materials and methods A retrospective chart review of 20 consecutive patients was performed. Seventeen patients had adequate follow-up for inclusion. Preoperative clinical and radiographic characteristics as well as intraoperative findings were obtained from patient records. Postoperative Harris Hip scores and VAS pain scores were recorded at final follow-up. Results At an average of 27.8 months (range 12-48 months), the mean Harris Hip score improved from 64.7 preoperatively to 86.8 (p < 0.001). The mean VAS pain score improved from 4.80 to 1.53 (p = 0.001). Two patients (11.7%) underwent total hip arthroplasty at an average of 15 months postoperatively. Fourteen patients (82%) stated they would have the procedure again. There were no significant complications. Conclusion Surgical treatment of CAM type femoroacetabular impingement using a combined arthroscopic and mini-open anterior hip approach has a low complication rate and improves functional and pain scores at short-term follow-up. Watters TS, Kaufman AM, Solic JM, Stinnett SS, Olson SA. Combined Arthroscopic and Mini-Open Treatment of CAM-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement. The Duke Orthop J 2012;2(1):60-65.

scholarly journals Does capsular closure influence patient-reported outcomes in hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tear?

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Atzmon ◽  
Zachary T Sharfman ◽  
Barak Haviv ◽  
Michal Frankl ◽  
Gilad Rotem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Labral Tear ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Capsulotomy is necessary to facilitate instrument manoeuvrability within the joint capsule in many arthroscopic hip surgical procedures. In cases where a clear indication for capsular closure does not exist, surgeon’s preference and experience often determines capsular management. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of capsular closure on clinical outcome scores and satisfaction in patients who underwent hip arthroscopy surgery for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral tear. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed for hip arthroscopy surgeries with a minimum 2 years follow-up. Patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip, previous back or hip surgeries, and degenerative changes to this hip and secondary gains were excluded. Demographic data, intraoperative findings and patient-reported outcome scores were recorded, including the Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) and Hip Outcome Score (HOS). A total of 29 and 35 patients were included in the non-closure and closure groups, respectively. The mean follow-up time was over 3 years for both groups. The mean pre-operative and post-operative HOS scores and MHHS scores did not significantly differ between groups (pre-operative HOS: 65.6 and 66.3, P = 0.898; post-operative HOS: 85.4 and 87.2, P = 0.718; pre-operative MHHS: 63.2 and 58.4, P = 0.223; post-operative MHHS: 85.7 and 88.7, P = 0.510). Overall patient satisfaction did not differ significantly between groups (non-closure 86.3%, closure group 88.6%; P = 0.672). Capsular closure did not significantly influence satisfaction or clinical outcome scores in patients who underwent arthroscopic hip surgery for FAI or labral tear.

Age-Associated Pathology and Functional Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy in Female Patients: Analysis With 2-Year Follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (13) ◽  
pp. 3265-3271
Author(s):  
David A. Bloom ◽  
Jordan W. Fried ◽  
Andrew S. Bi ◽  
Daniel J. Kaplan ◽  
Nainisha Chintalapudi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Scores

Background: Previous research has demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between hip arthroscopy outcomes and age. Purpose: To investigate the link, if any, between hip arthroscopy outcomes and intraoperative pathology as well as with patient age and sex. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Of 272 female patients aged ≥14 years undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement between August 2010 and September 2017, and with 2-year patient-reported outcome scores, a total of 194 (71.3%) were included for final analysis. These patients were separated into 3 age-based cohorts: <30 years (n = 44), 30 to 45 years (n = 74), and >45 years (n = 76). Their data were then analyzed and compared with respect to patient characteristic information, intraoperative pathology, and functional outcome scores for statistical significance, which was set at P < .05. Results: When an analysis of variance was conducted for the 3 age groups at 2-year follow-up, there was a statistically significant difference for modified Hip Harris Score ( P = .0003; <30 years, 88.26 ± 13.1 [mean ± SD]; 30-45 years, 82.68 ± 18.0; >45 years, 75.03 ± 19.5). The results of an analysis of variance comparing 2-year Non-arthritic Hip Score were also statistically significant ( P = .0002; <30 years, 89.9 ± 13.7; 30-45 years, 85.8 ± 15.8; >45 years, 78.1 ± 17.2). Results of logistic regression demonstrated that the odds of a cam-type lesion decreased by 0.971 for every additional year in age among female patients. The odds of achieving the patient-acceptable symptomatic state decreased by a factor of 0.96 for each additional year in age ( P < .0004). Conclusion: Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in females led to improved functional outcomes at 2 years of follow-up, although older female patients did worse after hip arthroscopy as compared with their younger counterparts. There may be an age-dependent decrease in incidence of cam-type lesions in female patients.

Does acetabular coverage influence the clinical outcome of arthroscopically treated cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI)?

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (7) ◽  
pp. 831-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Ibrahim ◽  
S. Poitras ◽  
A. C. Bunting ◽  
E. Sandoval ◽  
P. E. Beaulé
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Alpha Angle ◽  
3D Analysis ◽  
Acetabular Coverage ◽  
Crossover Sign ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Scores

Aims What represents clinically significant acetabular undercoverage in patients with symptomatic cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of the degree of acetabular coverage on the functional outcome of patients treated arthroscopically for cam-type FAI. Patients and Methods Between October 2005 and June 2016, 88 patients (97 hips) underwent arthroscopic cam resection and concomitant labral debridement and/or refixation. There were 57 male and 31 female patients with a mean age of 31.0 years (17.0 to 48.5) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 25.4 kg/m2 (18.9 to 34.9). We used the Hip2Norm, an object-oriented-platform program, to perform 3D analysis of hip joint morphology using 2D anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. The lateral centre-edge angle, anterior coverage, posterior coverage, total femoral coverage, and alpha angle were measured for each hip. The presence or absence of crossover sign, posterior wall sign, and the value of acetabular retroversion index were identified automatically by Hip2Norm. Patient-reported outcome scores were collected preoperatively and at final follow-up with the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Results At a mean follow-up of 2.7 years (1 to 8, sd 1.6), all functional outcome scores significantly improved overall. Radiographically, only preoperative anterior coverage had a negative correlation with the improvement of the HOOS symptom subscale (r = -0.28, p = 0.005). No significant difference in relative change in HOOS subscale scores was found according to the presence or absence of radiographic signs of retroversion. Discussion Our study demonstrated the anterior coverage as an important modifier influencing the functional outcome of arthroscopically treated cam-type FAI. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:831–8.

Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy in High-Level Athletes: Results of a Shorter Interval Between Staged Bilateral Hip Arthroscopies

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 654-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Hassebrock ◽  
Anikar Chhabra ◽  
Justin L. Makovicka ◽  
Kostas J. Economopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Index Procedure ◽  
Outcome Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
High Level

Background: Hip arthroscopy is a safe and effective mechanism for treating femoroacetabular impingement symptoms in high level athletes. Bilateral symptoms occur in a subset of this population. Purpose: To discuss outcomes of bilateral hip arthroscopy in high-level athletes and compare a standard staged timeline for bilateral hip arthroscopic surgery versus an accelerated timeline. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review of all staged bilateral hip arthroscopies was performed on high-level athletes over a 3-year period. Patients were categorized into cohorts based upon when the second procedure was performed (4-6 weeks after the index procedure or >6 weeks after the index procedure). Exclusion criteria included any prior hip surgery, advanced arthritis, previous pelvic or femoral fracture, or inflammatory arthropathy. Demographics, radiographic measurements, operative reports of procedures performed, and patient-reported outcomes (Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score–Sport Specific Subscale, modified Harris Hip Score, return to sports, return to same level of play) were compared between groups at 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year intervals, with the Student t test used for continuous data and a chi-square test used for categorical data. Results: 50 patients were identified: 22 in the accelerated surgery (AS) group and 28 in the standard surgery (SS) group. Age and number of collegiate participants were greater in the AS group, whereas the number of high school participants and the time away from sports were higher in the SS group. Preoperative alpha angles were significantly larger among the AS group, but no differences were found in postoperative alpha angles, center edge angles, or Tönnis grades. No significant difference was seen in patient-reported outcomes between the 2 groups at 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up. Conclusion: Bilateral hip arthroscopy performed 4 to 6 weeks apart is a safe and effective treatment option for athletes with bilateral femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears; the procedures entail a high rate of return to sports, return to the same level of sports, and decreased time lost from sports. This information could be useful for an athlete deciding on whether to proceed with bilateral hip arthroscopy and deciding on the timing for the procedures.

Age and Outcomes in Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Comparison Across 3 Age Groups

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence J. Lin ◽  
Berkcan Akpinar ◽  
David A. Bloom ◽  
Thomas Youm
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: Limited evidence exists concerning the effect of age on hip arthroscopy outcomes for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to investigate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical failure rates across various age groups in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI. We hypothesized that older patients would experience lower improvements in PROs and higher clinical failure rates. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 109 of 130 eligible consecutive patients underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Patients were stratified into 3 groups for comparison (ages 15-34, 35-50, and 51-75 years). Clinical survival rates to revision surgery or total hip arthroplasty (THA) were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and PROs were assessed using analysis of variance. Regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with clinical failure and ΔPROs from baseline to 5 years. Results: The 5-year survival-to-revision rate was 71% (survival time, 69.2 months; 95% CI, 62.8 to 75.5 months). A significant difference in survival to THA was found between groups ( P = .030). Being in the older group versus the young and middle-aged groups predicted increased risk of THA conversion (hazard ratio, 5.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 28.6; P = .035). Overall modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) improved from baseline to 5 years (mHHS, P < .001; NAHS, P < .001). Body mass index (mHHS: beta, −1.2; 95% CI, −2.2 to −0.3; P = .013; NAHS: beta, −1.6; 95% CI, −2.6 to −0.5; P = .005) and baseline PROs (mHHS: beta, −0.8; 95% CI, −1.1 to −0.4; P < .001; NAHS: beta, −0.7; 95% CI, −1.1 to −0.4; P < .001) were predictive of 5-year ΔPROs. A decrease was seen in minimal clinically important difference rates in middle-aged ( P = .011) and old ( P = .030) groups from 6-month to 5-year outcomes. Conclusion: Although hip arthroscopy for FAI yielded improvements in PROs regardless of age, middle-aged and older patients experienced greater declines in clinical outcomes over time than younger patients. Older patients remain good candidates for arthroscopy despite a greater risk for conversion to THA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document