How Generic are Project Management Knowledge and Practice?

2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn Crawford ◽  
Julien Pollack
2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arash Fahmi Hassan ◽  
Farzad Haghighi-Rad ◽  
Amir-Reza Abtahi

Purpose This paper aims to design and develop a management game in the field of construction project management so that by playing the game, the required level of knowledge, skills, capabilities and overall project management competencies in individuals will be promoted. Also, player’s competencies can be measured. Design/methodology/approach This study, in terms of application, is applied research. The construction project management simulation game (CPMSG) was played by 18 university students. To evaluate the level of the players’ project management knowledge and quality of the game, questionnaires were used. Findings The game improves the players’ project management knowledge by 158%, and the educational program that was formulated in the game has also achieved the first three levels of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. In the field of game quality, analysis of players’ results of responses and scores show that the game has a good quality level. Originality/value The CPMS game provides a useful tool for project management training, especially in the field of construction projects. It helps in addition to improving the quality of teaching theoretical topics, making students acquainted with the risks and uncertainties of such projects, and provides a simulated experience. In the field of common behavior analysis and player’s selection, the results indicated that the majority of groups used high-quality materials during the games to perform activities related to the appearance of the building (such as finishing and building facade activities) and used medium quality materials in implementing infrastructural activities such as brickwork and floor construction that are not visible in the appearance of work.


Author(s):  
E. Baratashvili ◽  
N. Chubinidze

The article discusses the problems of the modern textbooks and teaching aids on pedagogy, where the solution of management problems is the content of the chapter, which is often called “Management of educational systems”. Then authors define, that in scientific papers devoted to the problems of pedagogical management, the view of his specific object and subject is substantiated. So, it is considered that pedagogical management as a science of management of educational systems and processes is a branch of pedagogy, the subject of which is the organization of management in the field of education and in educational institutions. The structure of pedagogical management includes the following levels: a. management of the teaching staff; b. teacher activity management; c. student activity management. The authors believe that in pedagogical management there are two levels of management: the head of the educational institution and the teacher. The activity of the head is aimed at creating conditions for the effective functioning and development of the entire educational system of the institution; the task of the teacher-manager is the organization of educational work with the aim of developing cognitive activity and the formation of the student's personality. According to the authors, project management is among the “young” and most demanded areas of scientific knowledge and practice.  Development of it over the past 50–60 years has gone from its understanding as a technological scheme for organizing work on the implementation of individual projects to the idea of project management as a methodology for system changes, which carried out in organizations, firms, corporations, territorial entities, across the country and interstate associations. The article also reviewed the most diverse areas of scientific knowledge. It is the project culture. We think that it is institutionally manifested in project activities, although it does not boil down to it. All of the above gives grounds for identifying historical and cultural sources of project management as a person’s ability, an independent type of professional activity and, finally, a cultural phenomenon. The authors think that in modern management concepts, there are two types of management - process (management of recurring activities in fundamentally unchanged external conditions) and project management (change management of the managed system). The latter is precisely the subject of research in the field of scientific knowledge and practice, called “project management” and the subject of one of the branches of management science - project management. In conclusion, the authors define the methodological foundations of project management in pedagogical management are system-activity, process, and resource approaches, which, being internally consistent, set the fundamental methodological orientation of research in the considered field of scientific pedagogical knowledge.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-235
Author(s):  
Eun-Kyung Seo ◽  
So-Yeon Park ◽  
Sung-Wook Kang

The purposes of this study were to examine the hygienic issues related to the prevention of infection during semi-permanent Makeup procedure s in Korea. The study was conducted from September 2015 to October 2015 with the questionnaire survey about knowledge and practice level regarding the prevention of infection among semi-permanent makeup practitioners in Korea. The survey questions were prepared with managerial guidelines for the prevention of infection. The results showed that the average score of knowledge regarding the prevention of infection was 77.2/100 and that of practice was 3.58/5.00. The results demonstrated that general knowledge on the prevention of infection had positive effects on the practice rate of prevention of infection among semi-permanent makeup practitioners. The authors suggested that both educational programs for the prevention of infection as well as regulation should be established to allow semi-permanent makeup artistry to establish itself as a legal and specialized job field.


2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti Zaleha Abdul Rasid ◽  
Wan Khairuzzaman Wan Ismail ◽  
Nor Hazlin Mohammad ◽  
Choi Sang Long

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document