Theoretical Considerations of Headgear Therapy: A Literature Review

1978 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. E. J. Bowden

The literature of headgear therapy is reviewed and used to explain some of the theoretical mechanical principles of tooth movement and anchorage control achieved by this method. Part 1, Mechanical Principles, is a review of force directions, centres of rotation, force magnitude and duration. In Part 2, Clinical Response and Usage, the clinical uses of different directions of force are examined. Some of the clinical research into the changes produced by different headgears is described. An attempt is made to draw conclusions from the theoretical concepts discussed which may be of aid to the clinician.

1978 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 173-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. E. J. Bowden

In Part 1 the literature on the direction and moment force systems of headgear therapy was discussed. The magnitude and duration of forces were briefly dealt with. In Part 2 the clinical response to the main directions of headgear force as reported in the literature will be described. Recommendations on the most appropriate direction and moment force systems for particular clinical situations will be made.


2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Livas ◽  
Albert Cornelis Jongsma ◽  
Yijin Ren

Artificial abrasion of interproximal surfaces has been described for almost seventy years as orthodontic intervention for achievement and maintenance of ideal treatment outcome. A variety of terms and approaches have been introduced throughout this period implying a growing clinicians’ interest. Nevertheless, the widespread recognition of enamel stripping technique was initiated by the advent of bonded orthodontic attachments and a 2-article series of Sheridan in the 80’s. Since then, experimental and clinical research has been focused on the investigation of instrumentation efficacy and potential iatrogenic sequelae related to interproximal stripping. This review discusses the evolution, technical aspects and trends of enamel reduction procedures as documented in the literature.


2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-23
Author(s):  
Nadia M.T. Roodenrijs ◽  
Marlies C. van der Goes ◽  
Paco M.J. Welsing ◽  
Janneke Tekstra ◽  
Jacob M. van Laar ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 1113-1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackie L Nam ◽  
Kaoru Takase-Minegishi ◽  
Sofia Ramiro ◽  
Katerina Chatzidionysiou ◽  
Josef S Smolen ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo update the evidence for the efficacy of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to inform European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Task Force treatment recommendations.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for phase III or IV (or phase II, if these studies were lacking) randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 2013 and February 2016. Abstracts from the American College of Rheumatology and EULAR conferences were obtained.ResultsThe RCTs confirmed greater efficacy with a bDMARD+conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) versus a csDMARDs alone (level 1A evidence). Using a treat-to-target strategy approach, commencing and escalating csDMARD therapy and adding a bDMARD in cases of non-response, is an effective approach (1B). If a bDMARD had failed, improvements in clinical response were seen on switching to another bDMARD (1A), but no clear advantage was seen for switching to an agent with another mode of action. Maintenance of clinical response in patients in remission or low disease activity was best when continuing rather than stopping a bDMARD, but bDMARD dose reduction or ‘spacing’ was possible, with a substantial proportion of patients achieving bDMARD-free remission (2B). RCTs have also demonstrated efficacy of several new bDMARDs and biosimilar DMARDs (1B).ConclusionsThis systematic literature review consistently confirmed the previously reported efficacy of bDMARDs in RA and provided additional information on bDMARD switching and dose reduction.


2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ikuo Sekine ◽  
John D. Minna ◽  
Kazuto Nishio ◽  
Tomohide Tamura ◽  
Nagahiro Saijo

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 704-705
Author(s):  
Li-Qiong Wang ◽  
Wen-Yuan Li ◽  
Wen-Jing Xiong ◽  
Ning Liang ◽  
Yun-Jiao Zhang ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 502-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Gonzales ◽  
Hitoshi Hotokezaka ◽  
Masako Yoshimatsu ◽  
Joseph H. Yozgatian ◽  
M. Ali Darendeliler ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the effect of different continuous moderate to very heavy forces on root resorption or amount of tooth movement. Materials and Methods: In the study, 10, 25, 50 and 100 g mesial force were applied to the maxillary first molars of rat using nickel titanium closed-coil springs for 3 days, 14 days, and 28 days. The molars were extracted and the surface areas of the root resorption craters were measured using scanning electron microscope. The depths of the root resorption craters were measured using a three-dimensional laser scanning microscope. Tooth movement of the maxillary first molar was measured in relation to the maxillary second molar on digitized lateral cephalometric radiographs. Results: Three days after force application, the tooth movement was not proportionally related to force magnitude. However, 14 days of force application resulted in significantly more tooth movement in the 10, 25, and 50 g force groups than in the 100 g force group. A force application of 10 g produced significantly more tooth movement at 28 days than all the other three force applications. The largest and deepest resorption craters were observed in the disto-buccal root followed by disto-palatal, middle-buccal, middle-palatal, and mesial root. Root resorption and tooth movement increased over time from 3 to 28 days. As heavier forces were applied, greater root resorption occurred. Conclusion: The hypothesis is rejected. The light mesially oriented forces, as applied in this study, produced more tooth movement and less root resorption compared with heavier forces.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document