scholarly journals Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

Hematology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 312-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnes Y.Y. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Ambulatory Setting ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Gastrointestinal Problems ◽  
Prevention And Treatment

Abstract Robust evidence remains scarce in guiding best practice in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients living with cancer. Recommendations from major consensus guidelines are largely based on extrapolated data from trials performed mostly in noncancer patients, observational studies and registries, studies using surrogate outcomes, and underpowered randomized controlled trials. Nonetheless, a personalized approach based on individual risk assessment is uniformly recommended for inpatient and outpatient thromboprophylaxis and there is consensus that anticoagulant prophylaxis is warranted in selected patients with a high risk of thrombosis. Prediction tools for estimating the risk of thrombosis in the hospital setting have not been validated, but the use of prophylaxis in the ambulatory setting in those with a high Khorana score is under active investigation. Symptomatic and incidental thrombosis should be treated with anticoagulant therapy, but little is known about the optimal duration. Pharmacologic options for prophylaxis and treatment are still restricted to unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, and vitamin K antagonists because there is currently insufficient evidence to support the use of target-specific, non-vitamin K-antagonist oral anticoagulants. Although these agents offer practical advantages over traditional anticoagulants, potential drug interaction with chemotherapeutic agents, gastrointestinal problems, hepatic and renal impairment, and the lack of rapid reversal agents are important limitations that may reduce the efficacy and safety of these drugs in patients with active cancer. Clinicians and patients are encouraged to participate in clinical trials to advance the care of patients with cancer-associated thrombosis.

scholarly journals Low-molecular-weight heparins for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: A systematic literature review of efficacy and cost-effectiveness

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Dranitsaris ◽  
Lesley G Shane ◽  
Seth Woodruff
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparins ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism

Background Patients with cancer have an elevated risk of venous thromboembolism. Importantly, patients with cancer, who have metastatic disease, renal insufficiency, or are receiving anticancer therapy, have an even higher risk of a recurrent event. Similarly, the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism is higher than the risk of an initial event. To reduce the risk, extended duration of prophylaxis for up to six months with low-molecular-weight heparins such as dalteparin, enoxaparin, nadroparin, and tinzaparin is recommended by international guidelines. In this paper, the clinical and economic literature is reviewed to provide evidenced based recommendations based on clinical benefit and economic value. Methods A systematic review of major databases was conducted from January 1996 to October 2016 for randomized controlled trials evaluating the four distinct low-molecular-weight heparins against a vitamin K antagonists control group for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer. This was then followed by the application of the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence guidance to assess the quality of all trials that met the inclusion criteria. Finally, the cost-effectiveness literature supporting the value proposition of each product was reviewed. Results Six randomized trials met the inclusion criteria. There were one, two, and three trials that compared dalteparin, tinzaparin, and enoxaparin to a vitamin K antagonists control group. However, there were no trials for nadroparin in the setting of secondary venous thromboembolism prevention. In addition, only the dalteparin and one of the tinzaparin trials were of high quality and adequately powered. Of the two studies, only the dalteparin trial reported a statistically significant benefit in terms of venous thromboembolism absolute risk reduction when compared to a vitamin K antagonists control group (HR = 0.48; p = 0.002). In addition, there was robust pharmacoeconomic data from Canada, the Netherlands, France, and Austria supporting the cost-effectiveness of dalteparin for this indication. There were no such studies for any of the other agents. Conclusions The totality of high-quality clinical and cost-effectiveness data supports the use of dalteparin over other low-molecular-weight heparins for preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

Benefit–risk profile of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in the management of venous thromboembolism

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (02) ◽  
pp. 231-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Ageno ◽  
Jan Beyer-Westendorf
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitor ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Orthopaedic Patients ◽  
Prevention And Treatment

SummaryThe prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a clinical challenge, primarily owing to drawbacks associated with the use of heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). These and other factors, including a growing elderly population, mean that VTE presents a continuing burden to patients and physicians. Anticoagulant therapy is a fundamental approach for VTE management. Non- VKA oral anticoagulants, including the factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, and the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, have been studied in phase III trials across a spectrum of thromboembolic disorders. These agents offer simplified care, with similar or improved efficacy and safety outcomes compared with heparins and vitamin K antagonists. There are several factors a physician must consider when prescribing an anticoagulant. An important consideration with all anticoagulant use is bleeding risk, especially in high-risk groups such as the elderly or those with renal impairment or cancer. In orthopaedic patients, other risks include a need for surgical revision or blood transfusion, or wound complications. Therefore, the clinical benefits of an anticoagulant should ideally be balanced with any risks associated with the therapy. Quantitative benefit–risk assessments are lacking, and owing to differences in trial design the non-VKA oral anticoagulants cannot be compared directly. Based on trial and “reallife” data, this review will summarise the clinical data for the non-VKA oral anticoagulants in the prevention and treatment of VTE, focusing on the balance between the benefits and risks of anticoagulation with these drugs, and their potential impact on VTE management.

Idiopathic venous thrombosis

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (01) ◽  
pp. 48-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Haas
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Net Clinical Benefit ◽  
The Individual

SummaryIdiopathic venous thromboembolism has been shown to be associated with a high frequency of recurrence. Therefore, the most important aim of long-term treatment is secondary prevention. It has also been shown that long-term anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists can impressively reduce the rate of recurrence. However, this effect was only maintained during anticoagulation and disappeared after cessation of anticoagulant therapy. Unfortunately, the individual risk of recurrence is not predictable. Therefore, longterm anticoagulation appears beneficial across all subgroups of patients suffering from venous thromboembolism, regardless of the presence of thrombophilia or other burden of the disease. Despite the increasing body of evidence regarding the advantages of long-term anticoagulation, bleeding complications may limit the net clinical benefit of this strategy. Thus, the development of anticoagulants having a low potential for adverse reactions and providing similar beneficial antithrombotic effects to vitamin K antagonists will enhance the readiness for their wide spread use and life long administration.

Meta-analysis comparing impact of age, sex and renal function on the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants vs. vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolisms

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J She ◽  
B.Z Zhuo
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Creatinine Clearance ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Acute Venous Thromboembolism

Abstract Background New direct oral anticoagulants (NOACs), as a preferable treatment option for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been recommended with practical advantages as compared to Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in clinical practice. Purpose In our study, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of NOACs vs. VKAs in patients with different age, sex and renal function for the treatment of VTE. Methods Electronic databases (accessed October 2019) were systematically searched to identify RCTs evaluating apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban versus VKAs for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. Results NOACs was associated with a borderline higher efficacy in female (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.62–1.02), and a significantly higher efficacy in patients with age more than 75 (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32–0.80) and creatinine clearance less than 50 mL/min (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.32–0.99). NOACs also show advantage in terms of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding in male (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60–0.86), and patients with creatinine clearance more than 50 mL/min (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67–0.84). Conclusions NOACs have exhibited clinical preference among patients with acute VTE as compared to VKA with significantly decreased thrombosis events and lower bleeding complications, especially in patients with age more than 75 and creatinine clearance less than 50 mL/min. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81800390) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi province (2018KW067).

Comparison of Bleeding Risk Scores in Elderly Patients Receiving Extended Anticoagulation with Vitamin K Antagonists for Venous Thromboembolism

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea N. Frei ◽  
Odile Stalder ◽  
Andreas Limacher ◽  
Marie Méan ◽  
Christine Baumgartner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Likelihood Ratios ◽  
Risk Categories

Abstract Background In elderly patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), the decision to extend anticoagulation beyond 3 months must be weighed against the bleeding risk. We compared the predictive performance of 10 clinical bleeding scores (VTE-BLEED, Seiler, Kuijer, Kearon, RIETE, ACCP, OBRI, HEMORR2HAGES, HAS-BLED, ATRIA) in elderly patients receiving extended anticoagulation for VTE. Methods In a multicenter Swiss cohort study, we analyzed 743 patients aged ≥65 years who received extended treatment with vitamin K antagonists after VTE. The outcomes were the time to a first major and clinically relevant bleeding. For each score, we classified patients into two bleeding risk categories (low/moderate vs. high). We calculated likelihood ratios and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for each score. Results Over a median anticoagulation duration of 10.1 months, 45 patients (6.1%) had a first major and 127 (17.1%) a clinically relevant bleeding. The positive likelihood ratios for predicting major bleeding ranged from 0.69 (OBRI) to 2.56 (Seiler) and from 1.07 (ACCP) to 2.36 (Seiler) for clinically relevant bleeding. The areas under the ROC curves were poor to fair and varied between 0.47 (OBRI) and 0.70 (Seiler) for major and between 0.52 (OBRI) and 0.67 (HEMORR2HAGES) for clinically relevant bleeding. Conclusion The predictive performance of most clinical bleeding risk scores does not appear to be sufficiently high to identify elderly patients with VTE who are at high risk of bleeding and who may therefore not be suitable candidates for extended anticoagulation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document