The e13a2 BCR-ABL1 Transcript Is Associated with Higher Rates of Molecular Recurrence after Treatment-Free Remission Attempts: Retrospective Analysis of the Adelaide Cohort

Abstract Background: For patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), treatment-free remission (TFR) is increasingly becoming a goal of therapy. While the safety of TFR has been established [Mahon, Lancet Oncol 2010; Ross, Blood 2013], the ability to predict success following attempted TFR remains limited. Recent publication of Euro-Ski [Saussele, Lancet Oncol 2018], the largest tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) cessation study to date, demonstrated that duration of MR4 (BCR-ABL1 <0.01% IS) prior to attempted TFR was the main factor predicting TFR success. Aim: To identify the predictors of TFR in a single academic centre. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult CML patients receiving their primary CML management at the Royal Adelaide Hospital between January 2008 and March 2018, reviewing both clinical and molecular data. Criteria for qualifying for a TFR attempt included a minimum of 3 years (yrs) of TKI therapy and 2 yrs of deep molecular response (DMR: BCR-ABL1 <0.0032% IS; MR4.5). History of blast crisis, allogeneic stem cell transplantation and non-quantifiable atypical BCR-ABL1 transcripts precluded TFR qualification. Patients were monitored with monthly BCR-ABL1 qRT-PCRs for at least the first 12 months of the TFR attempt. In the event of molecular recurrence, defined as loss of major molecular response (MMR; BCR-ABL1 ≥ 0.1% IS) on a single test, TKI was recommenced. Our population also included 20 patients enrolled in the Australian CML8 (TWISTER) study where restart criteria was more stringent, requiring TKI restart in the event of BCR-ABL1 becoming detectable on 2 consecutive tests. Results: A total of 298 patients were treated at our institution within the defined time frame and 280 patients qualified for inclusion into our retrospective analysis. TFR eligibility was attained in 114 patients and 96 (84%) attempted TFR. Table 1 details patient characteristics of patients attempting TFR. Of the 82 patients with >12 months of follow-up, 52% (n=43) remain off TKI at 12 months in MMR. Variables were assessed by univariate Cox proportional hazards regresssion analysis for their association with TFR. The most significant finding was that patients attempting TFR with e14a2 BCR-ABL1 transcripts were more likely to remain in TFR at 12 months (65%; n=24/37) in comparison to the e13a2 transcript (34%; n=10/29), p = 0.008. This advantage also translated to patients with both e14a2 and e13a2 transcripts when grouped with the e14a2 cohort and compared with e13a2 alone, p = 0.006. The negative effect of the e13a2 transcript was further confirmed on multivariate analysis (Figure 1a) as patients with either e14a2 or both transcript types were 2.24 times more likely to remain in TFR at 12 months compared with the e13a2 transcript, p=0.032. Patients with sustained MR4.5 >3.4 yrs prior to cessation were more likely to remain in TFR at 12 months (42 vs. 64%, p = 0.014). We postulated that the higher rate of TFR in patients with e14a2 might be due in part to the longer time in MR4.5 prior to cessation. The median duration of MR4.5 prior to stopping in the e14a2 cohort was 4.1 yrs (2.05 - 10.76) compared to 3.01 yrs (2 - 10.41) in the e13a2 group (Table 2). Cumulative incidence curves of all 280 patients in our analysis demonstrated that by 6 yrs of TKI therapy, 70% of patients with e14a2 transcripts achieved MR4.5 whereas only 52% of patients with e13a2 transcripts attained MR4.5; confirming that patients with e14a2 transcripts are more likely to achieve DMR earlier (Figure 1b). Furthermore by 8 yrs, 48% of patients with e14a2 transcripts became eligible for a TFR attempt compared with only 32% of e13a2 transcripts (Figure 1c). While patients with e13a2 transcripts eventually achieve the same frequency of MR4.5 as the e14a2 group, the earlier achievement of MR4.5 in e14a2 patients may have contributed to the difference in TFR success. Conclusion: The factors that we identified as most predictive for TFR success were duration of MR4.5 and the presence of the e14a2 transcript, which has not been described previously. We also observed earlier achievement of MR4.5 in the e14a2 cohort, consistent with other studies [Jain, Blood 2016]. These observations, taken together, raise important questions about the impact of transcript type on disease biology, drug sensitivity, and immunological response which warrant further investigation. Disclosures Shanmuganathan: Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel sponsorship; Janssen: Honoraria; Royal Adelaide Hospital Research Fund: Other: Scholarship; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Other: Travel sponsorship. Branford:Qiagen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Cepheid: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Yong:BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Hiwase:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Yeung:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Specialised Therapeutics Australia: Honoraria. Ross:BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding. Hughes:BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

ENESTnd Update: Nilotinib (NIL) Vs Imatinib (IM) In Patients (pts) With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and The Impact Of Early Molecular Response (EMR) and Sokal Risk At Diagnosis On Long-Term Outcomes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.92.92 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 92-92 ◽

Cited By ~ 27

Author(s):

Giuseppe Saglio ◽

Andreas Hochhaus ◽

Timothy P. Hughes ◽

Richard E. Clark ◽

Hirohisa Nakamae ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Eligibility Criterion ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Vascular Events ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Impact

Abstract Introduction Frontline NIL continues to show benefit over IM in pts with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) CML-CP, with higher rates of major molecular response (MMR; BCR-ABLIS ≤ 0.1%) and MR4.5 (BCR-ABLIS ≤ 0.0032%), lower rates of progression to accelerated phase (AP)/blast crisis (BC) and fewer new BCR-ABL mutations on treatment in the Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials–Newly Diagnosed Pts (ENESTnd) trial. Here, we report data with a minimum follow-up (f/u) of 4 y; updated data based on 5 y of f/u will be presented. Methods Adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP (N = 846) were randomized to NIL 300 mg twice daily (BID; n = 282), NIL 400 mg BID (n = 281), or IM 400 mg once daily (QD; n = 283). Progression and overall survival (OS) events were collected prospectively during study f/u, including after discontinuation of study treatment. Efficacy in the NIL 300 mg BID and IM arms was evaluated based on achievement of EMR (BCR-ABLIS ≤ 10% at 3 mo). Results At 4 y, ≥ 87% of pts remained on study in each arm and 57%-69% remained on core treatment (Table). Rates of MMR and MR4.5 by 4 y were significantly higher with NIL vs IM. Significantly fewer pts progressed to AP/BC on NIL vs IM (on core treatment: 0.7%, 1.1%, and 4.2%; on study: 3.2%, 2.1%, and 6.7% [NIL 300 mg BID, NIL 400 mg BID, and IM arms, respectively]). Of 17 pts across the 3 arms who progressed on core treatment, 11 (65%) had never achieved complete cytogenetic response and none had achieved MR4.5. Fewer mutations have emerged in the NIL arms vs the IM arm; in y 4, mutations emerged in 2 pts (1 pt with T315I on NIL 300 mg BID; 1 pt with F317L on IM). More pts achieved EMR in the NIL 300 mg BID arm vs the IM arm (91% vs 67%). Pts with EMR had significantly higher rates of progression-free survival (PFS) and OS at 4 y vs pts with BCR-ABL > 10% at 3 mo. Among pts with BCR-ABL > 10% at 3 mo, more progressions to AP/BC occurred in the IM arm (n = 14) vs the NIL 300 mg BID arm (n = 2); half of these pts progressed between 3 and 6 mo. In pts with intermediate or high Sokal risk, PFS and OS at 4 y were higher in both NIL arms vs the IM arm. No new safety signals were detected. Selected cardiac and vascular events were more common on NIL vs IM (by 4 y, peripheral arterial occlusive disease [PAOD] in 4 [1.4%], 5 [1.8%], and 0 pts; ischemic heart disease [IHD] in 11 [3.9%], 14 [5.1%,] and 3 [1.1%] pts; and ischemic cerebrovascular events in 3 [1.1%], 5 [1.8%], and 1 [0.4%] pts in the NIL 300 mg BID, NIL 400 mg BID, and IM arms, respectively). In the NIL 300 mg BID arm, 2 of 11 IHD events occurred between 3 and 4 y (all 4 PAOD events occurred in the first 2 y). In the NIL 400 mg BID arm, 2 of 5 PAOD events and 3 of 14 IHD events occurred between 3 and 4 y. Most pts (7 of 9) with a PAOD event on NIL were at high risk due to a combination of baseline risk factors. Conclusions NIL, a standard-of-care frontline therapy option for newly diagnosed CML-CP pts, affords superior efficacy compared with IM, including higher rates of EMR (which is associated with improved long-term outcomes), higher rates of MR4.5 (a key eligibility criterion for many studies of treatment-free remission), and a lower risk of disease progression. NIL continues to show good tolerability with long-term f/u. While selected cardiac and vascular events (including PAOD) are slightly more frequent on NIL vs IM, no increase in annual incidence of these events over time has been observed. Disclosures: Saglio: ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hochhaus:Ariad: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Hughes:Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL: Research Funding. Clark:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Nakamae:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, travel/ accomodations/ meeting expenses Other. Kim:BMS, Novartis,IL-Yang: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Etienne:Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Flinn:Novartis: Research Funding. Lipton:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Moiraghi:Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Fan:Novartis: Employment. Menssen:Novartis: Employment. Kantarjian:Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding. Larson:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

The Outcome of Treatment-Free Remission after First-Line Nilotinib or Dasatinib in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Is Different

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146722 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2552-2552

Author(s):

Franck E. Nicolini ◽

Vincent Alcazer ◽

Stephanie Dulucq ◽

Sandrine Hayette ◽

Jean-Michel Cayuela ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Median Dose ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

French Group ◽

Treatment Free Remission ◽

The Impact

Abstract Aims: The absolute number of chronic phase CML patients (pts) reaching the treatment-free remission (TFR) criteria has been substantially increased by the use of second-generation TKI (TKI2), initiated since diagnosis, comparing to Imatinib first-line. However, the relative rate of unsuccessful TFR (i. e. pts loosing their MMR after TKI2 cessation) still remains around 50% at 2 years and beyond, whatever the TKI2 was. The aim of this study is to analyse the rate of successful TFR in pts receiving Nilotinib (Nilo) or Dasatinib (Dasa) first-line obtaining the appropriate criteria. Methods: Observational retrospective study in 3 reference centers of the French group of CML lead between 2010 and 2021. Eligible pts were CP CML pts initiating either Nilo 300 mg BID or Dasa 100 mg daily since diagnosis, until cessation for sustained MR4.5 (i.e. ≥2 years on ≥4 datapoints). Data were retrospectively collected according to the national regulations with pts' information. All pts were assessed and followed according to ELN recommendations 2009, 2013 and 2020 along treatment and to the recommendations from the French group of CML (D. Rea et al., Cancer 2018) for TFR. In this regard, the TKI2 was resumed in case of loss of MMR. All BCR-ABL1 assessments were performed in the 3 reference laboratories, standardised and expressed in % (IS) with ≥32,000 copies of ABL1 as control. All patients were harbouring major BCR-ABL1 transcripts. The primary endpoint was the survival without loss of MMR after TKI2 cessation. The secondary endpoints were the kinetics of MMR loss, and the identification of factors influencing MMR loss. Results: Seventy-two pts were reported (47 Nilo, 25 Dasa) with 57% females with a median age at diagnosis of 48 (36.75-61.25) years. The median follow-up since diagnosis was 9.26 (3.75-13.75) years (8.8 for Nilo and 9.47 for Dasa p=ns) and after TKI2 cessation 3.94 (0.7-8.8) years (3.92 for Nilo and 3.90 for Dasa p=ns). Sokal scores were 42% Low, 41% Intermediate, 17% High in Nilo and 39% L, 25% I and 35% H in Dasa pts (p=ns). ELTS scores were 50% L, 22% I, 9.5% H (18.5% Uk) in Nilo and 46.5% L, 28.5% I and 3.5% H (21.5% Uk) in Dasa pts (p=0.95). Five (9%) pts harboured ACA at diagnosis in the Nilo group and 2 (7%) in the Dasa group (p=1.00). The median time from TKI2 initiation to sustained MR4.5 was 19 (3.12-36) months in the Nilo group and 16 (6.3-39) months in the Dasa group (p=0.644). The duration of sustained MR4.5 until cessation was 3.04 (1.5-9.3) years for Nilo and 2.65 (1.11-7.95) for Dasa (p=0.96). The median dosing of Nilo was 600 (300-800) mg daily and 80 (20-100) mg at TKI2 cessation. None of these patients switched to another TKI during the follow-up. TKI2 cessation occurred after 60.5 (43-74.5) months in the Nilo group and 68 (39-90) months in the Dasa group (p=0.581). Thirty-seven pts out of 47 (79%) were BCR-ABL1 undetectable at Nilo cessation 18/25 (72%) at Dasa cessation (p=0.60). At M3 after discontinuation, 58% of pts remained undetectable after Nilo cessation and 30.4% after Dasa cessation (p=0.05).The median survival of pts without loss of MMR was not reached in the Nilo group, and was 14 (4.73-NR) months in the Dasa group, (p=0.042) as analysed by the KM method (Figure 1.). Two patients died (1 Nilo, 1 Dasa) from competing events (solid tumours) after unsuccessful TFR. Twenty-eight pts (14 Dasa, 14 Nilo) restarted their TKI2 after MMR loss and all regained ≥ MMR after 3 months of Dasa at a median dose of 75 (40-100) mg daily and all except one (who regained MMR at M12) after resumption of Nilo at a median dose of 350 (300-600) mg daily. Univariate analysis identified pts with H+I Sokal (as compared to low) as an unfavourable factor for successful TKI2 cessation [HR=0.35 (0.15-0.83), p=0.017] and type of TKI2 (Nilo as reference vs Dasa) was discriminant [HR=2.1 (1.01-4.35), p=0.047]. Multivariate analysis identified the type of TKI2 as a significant factor impacting on TFR outcome [HR 2.11 (0.97-4.55], p=0.05]. Conclusions: As it is likely that no prospective head-to-head comparison will be performed in this setting, on this limited series of pts, we conclude that the outcome of TFR seems to be different according to the TKI2 used since diagnosis, suggesting the impact of distinct biological variables modified by the type of TKI2 on the long run (such as immunological system, BM micro-environment, others) on TFR outcome. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Nicolini: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding; Kartos Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sun Pharma Ltd.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Etienne: Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Rea: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Superior CMR-Rates with Tolerability-Adapted Imatinib 800 Mg Vs. 400 Mg Vs. 400 Mg + IFN In CML: The Randomized German CML-Study IV

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.357.357 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 357-357 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Rüdiger Hehlmann ◽

Susanne Jung-Munkwitz ◽

Michael Lauseker ◽

Martin C. Müller ◽

Armin Leitner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Randomized Study ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

High Dose ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Good Tolerability ◽

First Choice ◽

The Impact

Abstract Abstract 357 Treatment of CML with imatinib of 400 mg can be unsatisfactory. Treatment optimization is warranted. The German CML-Study group has therefore conducted a randomized study comparing imatinib 800 mg vs 400 mg vs 400 mg + IFN. A significantly faster achievement of MMR at 12 months has been observed with imatinib 800 mg in a tolerability adapted manner and MMR by 12 months has been found to translate into better overall survival. Since stable CMR has been associated with durable off-treatment remissions we sought to analyse the impact of tolerability-adapted imatinib 800 mg on CMR and survival. Standardized determinations of molecular response and evaluation of its impact on outcome are goals of CML-Study IV. CMR4 is defined as a BCR-ABL/ABL ratio of <0,01 on the International Scale. From July 2002 – April 30, 2009 1022 newly diagnosed patients with CML in chronic phase were randomized, 1012 were evaluable (338 with imatinib 800 mg, 324 with imatinib 400 mg, 350 with imatinib plus IFN). Median observation time was 40 months. The median average daily imatinib doses were 628 mg in the 800 mg arm and 400 mg in the 400 mg based arms. The actual median daily doses in the 800 mg arm per 3-months periods were: 555 mg, 737 mg, 613 mg, 600 mg, and 600 mg thereafter, reflecting the run–in period with imatinib 400 mg for 6 weeks in the first period and the adaptation to tolerability from the third 3-months period onwards. Median daily imatinib doses in the 400 mg arms were 400 mg throughout. Adaptation of imatinib dose in the 800 mg arm according to tolerability is reflected by similar higher-grade adverse events rates (WHO grades 3 and 4) with all treatments. Significantly higher remission rates were achieved with imatinib 800 mg by 12 months. The cumulative incidences of CCR by 12 months were 63% [95%CI:56.4-67.9] with imatinib 800 mg vs 50% [95%CI:43.0-54.5] with the two 400 mg arms. The cumulative incidences of MMR by 12 months were 54.8% [95%CI:48.7-59.7] with imatinib 800 mg vs 30.8% [95%CI:26.6-36.1] with imatinib 400 mg vs 34.7% [95%CI:29.0-39.2] with imatinib + IFN. The cumulative incidences of CMR4 compared with the MMR incidences over the first 36 months are shown in Table 1. Imatinib 800 mg shows superior CMR4 rates over the entire 36 months period, CMR4 is reached significantly faster with imatinib 800 mg as compared to the 400 mg arms. The CMR4 rates reach 56.8% by 36 months [95%CI:49.4-63.5] as compared to 45.5% with imatinib 400 mg [95%CI:38.7-51.0] and 40.5% with imatinib plus IFN [95%CI:34.6-46.3]. Most patients have stable CMR4 over the entire period. Time after start of treat-ment (months) Cumulative incidences MMR(%) CMR4 (%) IM400 n=306 D IM800 n=328 D IM400 +IFN n=336 IM400 n=306 D IM800 n=328 D IM400 +IFN n=336 6 8.6 9.5 18.1 9.7 8.4 3 0.7 3.7 1.3 2.4 12 30.8 24.0 54.8 20.1 34.7 7.5 12.3 19.8 7.4 12.4 18 50.3 18.1 68.4 14.3 54.1 21.2 12.2 33.4 9.8 23.6 24 63 13.0 76.0 13.2 62.8 30.7 12.3 43 13 30.0 36 79.3 2.3 81.6 10.9 70.7 45.5 11.3 56.8 16.3 40.5 In summary, superior CMR4 rates are achieved with high-dose imatinib adapted to good tolerability, and more patients in the tolerability-adapted 800 mg arm have stable CMR4 qualifying for treatment discontinuation as compared to the 400 mg based arms. With improved application imatinib remains first choice for early CML. Disclosures: Koschmieder: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schnittger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. German CML-Study Group:Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; BMBF: Research Funding; Essex: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Enestnd 4-Year (y) Update: Continued Superiority of Nilotinib Vs Imatinib in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.1676.1676 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 1676-1676 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Dong-Wook Kim ◽

Surapol Issaragrisil ◽

Richard E Clark ◽

Josy Reiffers ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Molecular Responses ◽

The Difference ◽

The Impact

Abstract Abstract 1676 Background: Pts treated with nilotinib in the ENESTnd phase 3 trial achieved higher and faster rates of major molecular response (MMR, ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABLIS), deeper molecular responses (MR4, ≤ 0.01%IS and MR4.5, ≤ 0.0032%IS), significantly lower rates of progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC), and fewer CML-related deaths compared with imatinib by 1, 2, and 3 y. Here, we report data with a minimum follow-up of 3 y; efficacy and safety data based on longer follow-up of 4 y will be presented to further assess the impact of nilotinib vs imatinib in pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP. Methods: Adult pts (N = 846) with newly-diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP were randomized to nilotinib 300 mg twice daily (BID; n = 282), nilotinib 400 mg BID (n = 281), or imatinib 400 mg once daily (QD; n = 283). MMR, MR4, MR4.5, time to progression to AP/BC, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Results: Significantly higher rates of MMR, MR4, and MR4.5 by 3 y were achieved in nilotinib- vs imatinib-treated pts (Table). Nilotinib led to the achievement of higher rates of molecular responses regardless of Sokal risk group or age. The difference in the rates of both MR4 and MR4.5 continued to be significantly higher for nilotinib, with the difference in favor of nilotinib increasing from 1 to 3 y (MR4: 9%-14% difference by 1 y, 18%-24% difference by 3 y; MR4.5: 6%-10% difference by 1 y, 13%-17% difference by 3 y). Among patients who achieved MMR, more pts achieved MR4 or MR4.5 on nilotinib 300 mg BID (68%) and nilotinib 400 mg BID (62%) compared with imatinib (49%). No pt in any arm progressed after achieving MR4.5. Significantly fewer pts progressed to AP/BC on nilotinib vs imatinib (Table). No new progressions occurred on core treatment between the 2-y and 3-y analyses. When events occurring after treatment discontinuation were included, the rates of progression to AP/BC were also significantly lower with nilotinib vs imatinib (Table). Nearly twice as many pts had emergent mutations on imatinib (n = 21) vs either nilotinib arm (n = 11 in each arm), with 5 pts overall developing mutations between 2 and 3 y. OS remained similar in all groups at 3 y, but fewer CML-related deaths occurred in both the nilotinib 300 mg BID (n = 5) and 400 mg BID (n = 4) arms vs imatinib (n = 14). Both drugs were well tolerated. Few new adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities were observed between 2 and 3 y. Rates of discontinuation due to AEs were 10%, 14%, and 11% in the nilotinib 300 mg BID, nilotinib 400 mg BID, and imatinib arms, respectively. Conclusions: Nilotinib continues to demonstrate superiority vs imatinib, yielding faster and deeper molecular responses and a significantly decreased risk of progression. Results of ENESTnd support the use of nilotinib as a standard of care option in newly diagnosed adult pts with Ph+ CML-CP and should be considered to replace imatinib as the standard-of-care frontline therapy for patients with Ph+ CML-CP. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kim:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Research Funding; II-Yang: Research Funding. Clark:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Reiffers:BMS: Expense reimbursement for travel expenses Other; Novartis: Expense reimbursement for travel expenses, Expense reimbursement for travel expenses Other. Nicolini:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hughes:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; CSL: Research Funding. Hochhaus:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kemp:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Fan:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Waltzman:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Larson:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Treatment-Free Remission in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase According to Reasons for Switching from Imatinib to Nilotinib: Subgroup Analysis from ENESTop

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.792.792 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 792-792 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Timothy P. Hughes ◽

Carla Maria Boquimpani ◽

Naoto Takahashi ◽

Noam Benyamini ◽

Nelma Cristina D Clementino ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Loss Of Response ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Treatment Free Remission

Abstract Background: ENESTop, an ongoing, single-arm, phase 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01698905), is the first trial specifically evaluating treatment-free remission (TFR; ie, stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI] treatment without a loss of response) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) who achieved a sustained deep molecular response after switching from imatinib (IM) to nilotinib (NIL). Of 126 patients in ENESTop who were eligible to stop NIL, 57.9% (95% CI, 48.8%-66.7%) maintained TFR at 48 weeks. Here we present results from a subgroup analysis based on reasons for switching from IM to NIL, categorized as intolerance, resistance, and physician preference. Methods:Eligible patients were adults with CML-CP who received ≥ 3 years of total TKI therapy (> 4 weeks of IM, followed by ≥ 2 years of NIL) and achieved a sustained MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1 ≤ 0.0032% on the International Scale [BCR-ABL1IS]) on NIL therapy; patients with a documented MR4.5 at the time of switch from IM to NIL were not eligible. Enrolled patients continued NIL treatment in a 1-year consolidation phase, and those without confirmed loss of MR4.5 (ie, consecutive BCR-ABL1IS > 0.0032%) were eligible to stop NIL in the TFR phase. Patients with loss of major molecular response (MMR; ie, BCR-ABL1IS > 0.1%) or confirmed loss of MR4 (ie, consecutive BCR-ABL1IS > 0.01%) during the TFR phase reinitiated NIL treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who maintained TFR (ie, no loss of MMR, confirmed loss of MR4, or treatment reinitiation) at 48 weeks after stopping NIL. In this post hoc analysis, rates of TFR at 48 weeks after stopping NIL and a Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis of treatment-free survival (TFS; defined as the time from the start of TFR to the earliest occurrence of any of the following: loss of MMR, confirmed loss of MR4, reinitiation of NIL due to any cause, progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis, death due to any cause) were evaluated in subgroups of patients who switched from IM to NIL due to intolerance, resistance, or physician preference. These categories were determined by grouping the reasons for switching from IM to NIL, as reported by the investigators, based on relatedness to safety (intolerance), loss of response/treatment failure (resistance), and the physician's clinical judgment (physician preference); individual reasons included within each category are presented in the Figure. Results:A total of 125 patients who entered the TFR phase were included in this analysis; 1 patient who was found to have had atypical transcripts was excluded. Among these 125 patients, the reasons for switching to NIL were categorized as intolerance in 51 patients (40.8%), resistance in 30 patients (24.0%), and physician preference in 44 patients (35.2%). The proportion of patients who maintained TFR at 48 weeks after stopping NIL was generally similar across the 3 subgroups: 30 of 51 (58.8%; 95% CI, 44.2%-72.4%) in the intolerance subgroup, 16 of 30 (53.3%; 95% CI, 34.3%-71.7%) in the resistance subgroup, and 27 of 44 (61.4%; 95% CI, 45.5%-75.6%) in the physician preference subgroup. KM analysis of TFS showed that in all 3 subgroups, the majority of TFS events occurred within the first 24 weeks after stopping NIL (Figure). There were no notable differences in the kinetics of TFS events among subgroups. The KM-estimated median duration of TFS was not reached by the data cutoff date in all 3 subgroups. Conclusion: Primary analysis from ENESTop showed that among patients with CML-CP who achieved a sustained MR4.5after switching from IM to NIL, 57.9% of those who stopped NIL maintained TFR at 48 weeks. In the present analysis, TFR was maintained at 48 weeks after stopping NIL by > 50% of patients in the intolerance, resistance, and physician preference subgroups, with generally similar results across subgroups. These findings suggest that the rate of successful TFR following second-line NIL does not differ based on the reasons for switching from IM to NIL. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Hughes: Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG): Other: Chair of the CML/MPN Disease Group. Boquimpani:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Takahashi:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Shuvaev:Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis pharma: Honoraria. Ailawadhi:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Lipton:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Turkina:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Moiraghi:BMS: Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Speakers Bureau. Nicolini:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sacha:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Adamed: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kim:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ILYANG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Fellague-Chebra:Novartis: Employment. Acharya:Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.: Employment. Krunic:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jin:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mahon:BMS: Honoraria; PFIZER: Honoraria; NOVARTIS PHARMA: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Second Treatment Free Remission after Combination Therapy with Ruxolitinib Plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147954 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2555-2555

Author(s):

Kendra Sweet ◽

Ehab L. Atallah ◽

Jerry P. Radich ◽

Mei-Jie Zhang ◽

Eva Sahakian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Treatment Free Remission ◽

One Year

Abstract Background: Discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is feasible in a subset of CML patients who have maintained a deep molecular response for at least two years. Numerous discontinuation trials have been performed and consistently show approximately 50% of patients relapse after stopping TKIs. A recent study examining rates of treatment free remission (TFR) after a second attempt at stopping TKIs found, with a median follow up time of 38.3 months, 64.3% of patients had a molecular relapse (defined as a loss of major molecular response (MMR)). At 12, 24 and 36 months, TFR rates were 48%, 42% and 35%, respectively. These data suggest some patients with a history of molecular relapse upon TKI cessation could successfully stop treatment on a subsequent attempt, yet the majority will relapse a second time. 'Complete eradication' of CML remains elusive in most patients likely as a result of minimal residual disease (MRD), which is the result of BCR-ABL independent drug resistance. More specifically, CML cells that reside in sanctuary sites such as the bone marrow adhere to fibronectin and demonstrate cell adhesion mediated drug resistance (CAM-DR). The bone marrow microenvironment contains many cytokines and growth factors capable of inducing STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation via the JAK-STAT pathway leading to protection against TKI-induced cell death. Inhibiting JAK2 and TYK2 leads to complete inhibition of pSTAT3-Y705, thereby implicating the role of activation of JAK2 and TYK2 in STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation and resistance towards BCR-ABL TKI-induced cell death. A phase I clinical trial combined ruxolitinib, which inhibits JAK2 and TYK2, plus nilotinib in chronic phase (CP) CML patients and found that ruxolitinib 15mg PO BID was safe and well tolerated with 4/10 patients achieving undetectable BCR-ABL1 transcripts by PCR. Study Design and Methods: This single arm phase II study (NCT03610971) will enroll 41 subjects from the H Jean Khoury Cure CML Consortium. Eligible subjects must have a confirmed diagnosis of CP-CML and have previously attempted to discontinue TKI therapy per NCCN guidelines and had molecular recurrence, defined as loss of MMR, and were restarted on TKI. This trial combines ruxolitinib 15mg BID plus BCR-ABL TKI (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib or bosutinib) for 12 28-day cycles in the combination treatment phase (CTP). RQ-PCR to measure BCR-ABL transcripts will be checked at screening and every three months during the CTP. In the event that a subject experiences intolerance to a TKI, has confirmed loss of MMR, or loss of MR4.5 (>0.0032% IS) on two central PCR results, or discontinues ruxolitinib, the subject will be removed from CTP and enter into long term follow-up (LTFU). CTP phase will be followed by further RQ-PCR screening for the concurrent TFR phase. At this time ruxolitinib will be discontinued and any subject who has met the criteria for the TFR phase will be enrolled. During the TFR phase, subjects will discontinue their TKI and be monitored off treatment with RQ-PCR checked monthly for the first year, every six weeks for year two, and every 12 weeks during year three. Upon molecular recurrence, defined as loss of MMR, TKIs will be restarted. The primary endpoint is the 12-month TFR rate subsequent to completion of 12 cycles of combination therapy; however, subjects will remain in the TFR phase for three years. Therefore, the total duration of the trial will be approximately five years (one year on CTP + three years in the TFR phase + one-year LTFU). Study statistical design was calculated to yield a one-sided type I error rate of 0.025 and power of 65% when the true one-year relapse rate is 35%. This study will additionally assess patient-reported outcomes in conjunction with RQ-PCR testing. PROMIS and other measures will be self-administered through REDCap. Correlative studies will include comparing changes in pSTAT3 in K562 and KU812 cell lines using plasma from CML patients being treated with TKIs plus ruxolitinib, using the plasma inhibitory assay technique. Changes in pSTAT3 and pSTAT5 will be correlated with clinical response and rate of TFR. Additional correlatives include multiparameter flow-based assessment of the T-cell compartment (activity/polarization) as well as natural killer cell fractions in CML patients at various time points (TKIs alone, TKIs plus ruxolitinib and during TFR). Thus far, 14 patients have been enrolled. Disclosures Sweet: Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Atallah: Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Radich: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thompson: Novartis/ Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Mauro: Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sun Pharma / SPARC: Research Funding. Pinilla Ibarz: AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, TG Therapeutics, Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Advisory; Sellas: Other: ), patents/royalties/other intellectual property; MEI, Sunesis: Research Funding; AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Takeda: Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Ruxolitinib is being used off-label in chronic myeloid leukemia

Download Full-text

The Canadian Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Discontinuation Trial with Imatinib Discontinuation As a First Attempt and with Dasatinib Discontinuation As a Second Attempt of Treatment-Free Remission: Results of 4 Years of Follow-up

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128283 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1644-1644

Author(s):

Dennis Dong Hwan Kim ◽

Isabelle Bence-Bruckler ◽

Lambert Busque ◽

Donna L. Forrest ◽

Lynn Savoie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Total Duration ◽

Transcript Level ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Deep Molecular Response ◽

Treatment Free Remission ◽

Reduced Risk

Introduction: The Canadian trial entitled "Treatment Free Remission Accomplished By Dasatinib" (BMS CA180543, NCT#02268370) is ongoing since Jan 2015, and has completed accrual of 131 patients. The study was designed to determine if using dasatinib (DA) can lead to a successful treatment-free remission (TFR) after failing a first attempt of TKI discontinuation following imatinib (IM) treatment. The preliminary results (ASH 2018) indicate: 1) The 6-month molecular relapse-free survival (mRFS) rate is estimated as 58.0%; 2) DA re-treatment is feasible and safe, with achievement of excellent rates of MMR and MR4; 3) The estimated TFR2 rate after DA discontinuation was 21.5±8.5% at 6 months [7.9-39.5%]). Herein, we report the 4-year follow-up results with updated TFR2 after second TFR attempt following DA discontinuation. Methods and materials: This prospective clinical trial has 3 phases: 1) IM discontinuation phase, 2) DA rechallenge phase, 3) DA discontinuation phase. Molecular relapse is defined as an increase in BCR-ABL transcript level above MR4.0 on 2 consecutive occasions, or an increase in BCR-ABL transcript level above MR3.0 on a single occasion. 100mg daily of DA is started if molecular relapse is confirmed and is discontinued 12 months after achieving MR4 following a 2nd TFR attempt. Results: As of Jun 25, 2019, 58 (44.3%) of 131 enrolled patients experienced molecular relapse after IM discontinuation with a mRFS rate of 59.1% [50.1-67.0%] and 56.8% [47.8-64.8%] at 6 and 12 months, respectively. TFR using loss of MMR as an event was 69.8% at 6/12 months. Of the 58 patients who lost response, 53 patients (91.4%) lost response within 6 months after IM discontinuation: 7 (10.1%) lost response within 2 months, 20 (34.5%) within 3 months, 14 (24.1%) within 4 months, 9 (15.5%) within 5 months, and 3 (5.2%) within 5-6 months. Beyond 6 months, 5 patients (15.5%) lost response within 7, 8, 10, 20, 21 months, respectively. Only two patients experienced late relapse occuring 15 months after IM discontinuation. 54 patients started DA, of whom 49 patients (90.7%) achieved MR4.5 on DA. Median time to MMR, MR4 and MR4.5 was 0.94, 1.95, and 2.48, respectively. The incidence of MMR, MR4 and MR4.5 at 3 months was 99.0% (86.3-99.0%), 91.5% (78.4-96.7%), and 76.6% (60.9-86.0%), respectively. 32/49 patients receiving DA attained MR4.5, and discontinued DA for a 2nd TFR attempt (TFR2). 25/32 (78.1%) of these patients lost molecular response at a median of 3.67 months after DA discontinuation. The estimated TFR2 after DA discontinuation was 18.5% at 6 months [6.8-34.7%], TFR2 using loss of MMR as a definition of molecular relapse was 20.4% [7.6-37.4%], while TFR2 using two consecutive losses of MR4 was 25.4% [9.4%-45.2%]. Two patients continued to attain deep molecular response at MR4.2 and undetectable level (equivalent to MR5.5) beyond 18 months after DA discontinuation. At last follow-up of Jun 25, 2019, 30 patients are still being monitored on trial on IM discontinuation (n=20), DA rechallenge (n=4) or DA discontinuation phases (n=6). With a median follow-up duration of 36 months, risk factor analyses were performed using Cox's proportional hazard regression model suggesting a strong correlation of mRFS with total duration of IM treatment prior to IM discontinuation (p<0.001, HR 0.864), MR4 duration (p<0.001, HR 0.867), but not with time to achieve MR4 (p=0.216). When patients attained MR4 or deeper for longer than 10.59 years, their mRFS was 91.8% [71.1-97.9%] at 12 months. The group who attained MR4 duration of 6.93 years or longer had 40.3% reduced risk of mRFS (HR 0.597 [0.449-0.794], p<0.001] compared to those with MR4 duration less than 6.93 years. The group who attained 10.59 years of MR4 duration or longer had a 65.5% reduced risk of mRFS (HR 0.345 [0.171-0.699], p=0.003] compared to those with MR4 duration less than 10.59 years. Conclusion: The 4-year follow-up results suggests that DA rechallenge after failing a first IM discontinuation attempt for TFR was safe, feasible and well tolerated. It was effective in most cases rapidly regained at least MR4. Based on the two cases who successfully discontinued DA more than 18 months after DA consolidation following achievement of deep molecular response, second generation TKI therapy after imatinib discontinuation failure is a feasible option. Further follow-up is strongly warranted in order to reach a clear conclusion on this issue. Disclosures Busque: ExCellThera: Patents & Royalties; Paladin: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Savoie:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Keating:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hoffman La Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Delage:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Liew:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Leber:Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Kinetics of BCR-ABL after TKI Interruption during Pregnancy in CML: A Multinational Retrospective Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-119615 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4263-4263 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jeong-Ok Lee ◽

Dong-Wook Kim ◽

Elisabetta Abruzzese ◽

Jane Apperley ◽

Louise Caldwell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Retrospective Analysis ◽

Research Funding ◽

Doubling Time ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Fold Increase ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Treatment Free Remission ◽

The Impact ◽

Kinetics Of

Abstract Introduction: Pregnancy requires, and is an important motivator of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) cessation in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). While conventional treatment free remission (TFR) attempts may allow observation of limited rise in BCR-ABL prior to expected TKI re-exposure, TKI cessation in pregnancy affords longer observation of BCR-ABL kinetics without automatic TKI re-exposure. Mathematical models and clinical observation of BCR-ABL kinetic rise during TKI discontinuation or planned cessation estimate of 'doubling time' (DT) of roughly 9 days (Branford et al., Blood 2012). In order to explore the impact of pregnancy, we studied BCR-ABL kinetics and response stability during and after pregnancy. Methods: We collected cases of successful pregnancies (conception->childbirth) at 4 CML referral centers including the following conditions: 1/conception occurring while on TKI therapy; 2/TKI therapy stopped for the purpose of conception; and 3/ pregnancy during TKI cessation within a TFR clinical trial. Cases with early spontaneous/elective abortion, treated with interferon during pregnancy or with less than 2 BCR-ABL transcripts recorded during pregnancy were excluded. Doubling time (DT) was calculated using the following formula: DT = ln2/k, where k = (ln(b)-ln(a))/d, where (a) and (b) is the value before the rise and at the rise, and (d) is days. Results: In total 50 pregnancies in 39 patients were analyzed; 10 patients had >1 pregnancy. Four pregnancies were in the context of TFR study (2 enrolled at conception, 1 patient 28mo in TFR, 1 patient 5mo in TFR). The majority of cases were on first-line treatment at TKI cessation and median duration of TKI therapy was 6.4 years (range 0.5-16.2); 58% were in deeper molecular response (MR4 or deeper) and 34% in major molecular response (MMR) at TKI cessation. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Median time off TKI was 10.1 months (range 5.4-71.5). Of 44 pregnancy cases within MMR or deeper at TKI cessation, 54.5% maintained MMR or greater; 60.7% of those in MR4 or deeper and 43.7% for those in MMR, respectively. Several cases were associated with decline in BCR-ABL off TKI: 2 cases of improvement from MMR to deep MR (MR5), and among 4 cases not in MMR at TKI cessation, 1 achieved MMR during pregnancy (Table 2). BCR-ABL rise in 2 or more consecutive measurements, and at least one measurement of rise defined as more than 2-fold increase, was observed in 24 patients. The median BCR-ABL doubling time among 54 such instances in these 24 patients was 18.3 days (range 1.8-306.8). Of 20 cases that lost MMR during pregnancy, 17 met these criterions for BCR-ABL rise; the median doubling time among 40 such instances in these cases was 14.7 days (1.8-306.8). Postpartum (n=48), 34 cases have been retreated to date; 14 others remain off therapy with ongoing deep MR (MR5) in 6 cases, MMR in 6 and BCR-ABL <1 (MR2) in 2. Of the 34 cases of retreatment, 5 were not evaluable due to limited time back on TKI (n=3), immediate re-cessation of TKI due to second pregnancy (n=1) or loss of follow-up (n=1). Of the 29 evaluable cases, to date 22 achieved deep MR (MR4 or greater) and 7 achieved MMR. Three patients deemed to not respond adequately after prior TKI resumption switched TKI and achieved MMR or deeper. Conclusions: BCR-ABL doubling time during TKI cessation for pregnancy was slower compared with that of non-pregnant patients with TKI cessation (TFR) or interruption historically. This retrospective analysis of pregnancy-associated TKI cessation demonstrates overall favorable response stability, with observation of high rates of MMR retention, slowing of BCR-ABL kinetic increase after initial rise, and rare cases of deepening remission over time off TKI. Overall kinetics of BCR-ABL appears variable during pregnancy associated TKI cessation. Given the prominence of pregnancy and family planning as a consideration for TFR attempt and these data, further study of the impact of pregnancy on CML biology, immune function, and relapse risk is warranted. Disclosures Kim: BMS: Research Funding; Ilyang: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Abruzzese:Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Apperley:Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Mauro:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Second Attempt of TKI Discontinuation with Dasatinib for Treatment-Free Remission after Failing First Attempt with Imatinib: Treatment-Free Remission Accomplished By Dasatinib (TRAD) Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114656 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 787-787 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Dennis Dong Hwan Kim ◽

Lambert Busque ◽

Donna L. Forrest ◽

Lynn Savoie ◽

Isabelle Bence-Bruckler ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Null Hypothesis ◽

Research Funding ◽

Transcript Level ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Log Reduction ◽

Relapse Pattern ◽

Treatment Free Remission ◽

Tki Discontinuation

Abstract Introduction: A Canadian tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) discontinuation trial is ongoing to determine if using dasatinib (DA) can lead to a successful treatment-free remission (TFR) after failing a first attempt of TKI discontinuation after imatinib (IM) treatment. The preliminary result indicate : 1) The 6-month molecular relapse-free survival (mRFS) rate is estimated as 58.0%; 2) DA re-treatment is feasible and safe, with achievement of excellent rates of MMR and MR4. We report here the preliminary analysis of the TFR rate at 6 months after DA discontinuation for the second TFR attempt. Methods and materials: This prospective clinical trial (BMS CA180-543, Clinicaltrial.gov NCT#02268370) has 3 phases: 1) IM discontinuation phase, 2) DA rechallenge phase, 3) DA discontinuation phase. Molecular relapse is defined as an increase in BCR-ABL transcript level < MR4.0 on 2 consecutive occasions, or a single increase in BCR-ABL transcript level < MR3.0. 100mg daily of DA is started if molecular relapse is confirmed and is discontinued 12 months after achieving > MR4 for a 2nd TFR attempt. The null hypothesis was a TFR2 rate of 17.5% while the alternative hypothesis was a TFR2 rate of 35.0% and the study was designed to reject our null hypothesis if > 28% of patients remain in TFR after DA discontinuation. Results: As of Jun 15, 2018, 53 (40.4%) of 131 enrolled patients experienced molecular relapse after IM discontinuation with a mRFS rate of 58.0% at 12 months (95% CI, 42.1-71.0%). Of the 53 patients who lost response, 51 patients received DA. The incidence of MMR, MR4 and MR4.5 at 3 months was 97.7%, 89.9%, and 84.6%, respectively. 25/ 51 patients receiving DA attained MR4.5 for 12 months or longer and discontinued it for a 2nd TFR attempt (TFR2). 21/25 (84.0%) of these patients lost molecular response at a median of 3.7 months after DA discontinuation. The estimated TFR2 rate after DA discontinuation was 21.5±8.5% at 6 months (95% CI [7.9-39.5%], Fig 1A). Thus we cannot reject our null hypothesis based on this result. For risk factor analysis for maintaining TFR2, the variables analysed included Sokal risk score, IM duration, MR4/MR4.5 duration, monthly doubling time after IM discontinuation, time to molecular relapse after IM discontinuation, molecular relapse pattern after IM discontinuation (MMR loss vs MR4 loss), and BCR-ABL1 qPCR value prior to DA discontinuation. 1) Time to molecular relapse after IM discontinuation correlates with TFR2 (p<0.001, HR 0.485, 95% CI [0.302-0.778]), which implies that 1 additional month of TFR duration after IM discontinuation decreases the risk of molecular relapse after DA discontinuation by 51.5%. The 6 month TFR2 rate was 8.9% (median 2.79 mo) in the group who relapsed within 3 months of TFR1 (n=14) and 30.0% (median 4.25%) in the group who relapsed within 3-6 months of TFR1 (n=10). The one patient who relapsed beyond 6 months of TFR1 did not lose molecular response after DA discontinuation. Thus patients who lost molecular response within 3 months of IM discontinuation have a faster loss of response after DA discontinuation (median 2.8 mo) compared to those who lost response after 3 mo (median 4.3 mo; P=0.018; Fig 3A) 2) Molecular relapse pattern after IM discontinuation correlates with TFR2. The group who had loss of MMR after IM discontinuation lost molecular response faster after DA discontinuation (n=19; median 3.0 months) compared to those with two consecutive losses of MR4(n=6; 6.43 months; p=0.0435, HR 2.991; Fig 3B). 3) The group with 5.5 log reduction or deeper in BCR-ABL1 qPCR transcripts prior to DA discontinuation (n=19) showed a TFR2 rate of 28.7% at 6 months (median TFR2 duration of 4.04 months) versus 0% in the group with qPCR transcript level between 4.5 and 5.4 log reduction (n=6, median TFR2 duration of 2.89 months; p=0.017; Fig 3C). We did not identify any other risk factor for molecular relapse after DA discontinuation . The expansion kinetics of the leukemic clone after DA discontinuation is similar to that after IM discontinuation. Conclusion: These preliminary results suggest that rechallenge with DA after failing a first IM discontinuation attempt for TFR is well tolerated and effective as most cases rapidly regained at least MR4. However, more strict criteria should be considered for TFR2 attempt, including achievement of a 5.5 log reduction or deeper in BCR-ABL1 qPCR levels prior to the 2nd TKI discontinuation attempt, and a MR4 duration of more than 12 months. Disclosures Kim: Pfizer: Consultancy; Paladin: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Busque:BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Paladin: Consultancy. Savoie:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bence-Bruckler:Lundbeck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Delage:BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liew:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Laneuville:BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Paladin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lipton:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Leber:Novartis Canada: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Canada: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

The Functional Activity of the OCT-1 Protein Is Predictive of Molecular Response and Survival in CP-CML Patients Treated with Imatinib: A 5 Year Update of the TIDEL Trial.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.507.507 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 507-507 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Deborah L White ◽

Verity A Saunders ◽

Amity Frede ◽

Phuong Dang ◽

Stephanie Zrim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Functional Activity ◽

Research Funding ◽

Intracellular Concentration ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Significant Difference ◽

The Impact ◽

First Time

Abstract Abstract 507 The major active influx protein for imatinib into target BCR-ABL positive cells is the organic cation transporter OCT-1. We have previously demonstrated that the functional activity of the OCT-1 protein (OCT-1 activity) is predictive of molecular response in TIDEL (trial of imatinib 600 mg/day with selective dose intensification in untreated CP-CML) The OCT-1 activity (OA) is measured in mononuclear cells from untreated CML patients by calculating the intracellular concentration of 14-C imatinib less the intracellular concentration in the presence of OCT-1 inhibition. To address the question of whether OA is predicting only the rate of response, we now investigate the impact of OA on response and progression at 5 years. There is a significant difference in the achievement of MMR (p=0.007) and CMR by 60 months (p=0.032) (Table 1). Six patients developed kinase domain mutations over the course of this study. 5/6 had low OA. Significantly, for the first time addressing Event Free Survival (events defined as loss of CHR, MCR or CCR, progression to AP or BC or change of therapy due to unsatisfactory efficacy), we demonstrate that more patients with high OA are event free at 5 years when compared to patients with low OA (Table 1). To determine whether the detrimental effect of low OA on survival was more significant in those patients with OA in the lowest quartile (Q1) we compared the response of Q1 patients to all other patients (Table 2). These data demonstrate importantly, that patients in Q1 have significantly poorer outcomes, than the remainder of the patient cohort. In previous analyses we have shown that the effects of a low OA can be partially overcome by higher imatinib doses. Limiting the analyses to those patients receiving <600mg average daily dose over the first 12 months there was a significant difference in the achievement of MMR (low OA (n=11) 27%: high OA (n=12) 92% p=0.021) and EFS (36% vs 75% p=0.03). In patients receiving ≥600 mg there was no significant difference between the groups, reinforcing the importance of dose. In 45 patients we examined the expression of OCT-1 mRNA for prediction of MMR, CMR, EFS and mutation development. Dividing the patients into low and high OCT-1 expression about the median we found that the level of mRNA is not predictive of MMR (low–60% vs high 78 p=0.241) CMR (low–45% vs high 55 p=0.456) EFS (low–55% vs high 70 p=0.315) or mutation development (low–18% vs high 14% p=0.666). These data indicate that the level of OCT-1 mRNA is not sufficiently discriminating to predict response and progression. While our previous studies demonstrated that OA could predict the rate of decline in BCR-ABL over the first 12-24 months, this update demonstrates for the first time, that this assay can identify nearly all patients (>80%) who fail to achieve MMR in the long term. Most importantly OA is also strongly predictive of resistance and progression events. Functional assessment of OCT-1 Activity provides prognostic information that is more discriminating than assaying the level of OCT-1 mRNA. This long term study reinforces the notion that OA is an important predictive variable in CP-CML patients treated with IM. It provides further evidence that OA is a critical variable to consider in future trials of imatinib and a key factor to enable individualization of imatinib dose to optimize the long term outcome for CML patients. Disclosures: White: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Manley:Novartis: Employment. Hughes:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text