scholarly journals MP0250 Combined with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma Patients Previoulsy Exposed to Proteasome Inhibitors and Immunomodulatory Drugs

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1980-1980
Author(s):  
Stefan Knop ◽  
Hartmut Goldschmidt ◽  
Marc S Raab ◽  
Monika Szarejko ◽  
Artur Jurczyszyn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽  
Multiple Cycles ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background MP0250 is a first-in-class selective tri-specific multi-DARPin® drug candidate neutralizing VEGF-Α and HGF as well as binding to human serum albumin to increase its plasma half-life. Preclinical studies have shown that MP0250 enhances sensitivity of Multiple Myeloma (MM) cells to bortezomib, inhibits tumor growth and reduces bone destruction. In this clinical phase 2 trial (NCT03136653), we are investigating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of the combination of MP0250 plus bortezomib and dexamethasone (dex) in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM previously exposed to proteasome inhibitors (PI) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD). Aims To study the efficacy and safety of MP0250 in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with RRMM. Trial Design This trial is recruiting adults ≥18 years of age with RRMM who have progressed after at least two prior treatment regimens including bortezomib and an IMiD. A dose-escalation phase (part 1) consisting of two cohorts will define a safe dose of the combination of MP0250 plus bortezomib + dex followed by a dose-expansion phase (part 2). Patients were enrolled to receive iv MP0250 on day 1 + subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, 11, oral dexamethasone (dex) 20 mg on days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, 11-12 of each 21-day cycle. Up to 40 patients will be enrolled. Patients will receive treatment until there is documented disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Methods The primary endpoint is efficacy in terms of overall response rate (ORR) per International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Secondary endpoints include safety, immunogenicity, progression free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR). Exploratory endpoints include overall survival, pharmacokinetics and potential biomarkers that include MM specific markers and cytokines monitoring bone homeostasis. The safety analysis set (SAF) is defined as patients who have received at least 1 dose of the combination of MP0250 plus bortezomib + dex. Results Data cut off was 21 July 2018. 8 pts have been treated in cohort 1 and 3 pts in cohort 2. Median time from initial diagnosis to first dose was 4.8 years (range, 1-10). Median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 2-5). All 11 pts had prior exposure to IMiDs and PIs and 4 pts were considered PI refractory. Four patients received PI immediately prior to receive MP250 in combination. The most frequent drug-related grade ≥ 3 AEs: hypertension in 3 pts, thrombocytopenia in 6 pts, proteinuria in 2 pts and transient liver enzyme elevation in 1 patient. One dose-limiting toxicity has been reported in cohort 1 (grade 3 hypertension) and two in cohort 2 (grade 3 epistaxis, grade 3 proteinuria). There were no infusion-related reactions. Best response achieved in the 8 efficacy evaluable pts in cohort 1 was VGPR in 1 and PR in 4 for an overall response rate (ORR, ≥PR) of 62.5%. In cohort 2, 1 patient achieved Minimal Response (MR), 1 patient stable disease and 1 progressive disease. Three of four patients who were coming immediately from a PI based regimen achieved a response. Pharmacokinetics data in cohort 1 show sustained exposure over multiple cycles with a mean half-life of 11 days, and no indication of ADA mediated drug clearance was observed. Data from cohort 1 patients show accumulation of MP0250-HGF complexes over multiple cycles confirming the stable binding of MP0250 to HGF suggesting that all circulating HGF is neutralized. Summary Data from cohort 1 (8 mg/Kg q3w) suggest that MP0250 can be safely combined with bortezomib and dex in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. Durable responses were seen in patients who came from PI based pretreatment suggesting that MP0250 might be capable to reverse PI resistance. Disclosures Knop: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldschmidt:Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; ArtTempi: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Raab:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Dürig:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Castellano Acosta:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Lemaillet:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Cortijo:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Sudhir:Molecular Partners AG: Employment.

Phase I-II Trial of Oral Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone and Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) (CPR) for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1874-1874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Esther Masih-Khan ◽  
Arooj Khan ◽  
Saima Dean ◽  
Peter Anglin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Oral Cyclophosphamide ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1874 Poster Board I-899 Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) and dexamethasone is an effective regimen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts), with an overall response rate of 60.6% and median time to progression (TTP) of 13.4 months (Dimopoulos MA, et al, Leukemia 2009 Jul 23 [Epub ahead of print]). Oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone is an older regimen with excellent patient tolerance, and we sought to enhance the efficacy of lenalidomide by adding oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone in this phase I-II trial. The CPR regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide on days 1, 8 and 15; lenalidomide on days 1–21; and prednisone 100 mg every other day in a 28 day cycle. ASA 81 mg/day was given to all pts as DVT prophylaxis. Three dose levels were evaluated using a 3 by 3 dose escalation design. Between 11/2007–07/2009, 31 pts with relapsed/refractory MM who had not previously received lenalidomide were entered onto study. Median age was 61 (40–78) years and 61% were male. Immunoglobulin subtype was IgG in 19 pts (61%), IgA in 8 pts (26%) and light chain only in 4 pts (13%). Median number of prior regimens was 2 (1–5) and 28 pts had undergone previous ASCT, including double transplants in 6 pts. Prior therapy included thalidomide in 9 (29%) and bortezomib in 15 (48%). FISH cytogenetics were available in 13 pts; one had 13q deletion but none had t(4;14) or p53 deletion. At the time of protocol entry, median β 2-microglobulin level was 246 (92–767) nm/L, albumin 39 (34–48) g/L, creatinine 83 (50–126) μmol/L, platelet count 230 (75–337) × 109/L and ANC 2.5 (1.1–6.1) x 109/L. Protocol treatment is summarized in Table 1. Dose limiting toxicity was not observed during cycle 1 at any dose level. Grade 3–4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia in 5 pts (16%) and neutropenia in 9 pts (29%). These were managed with dose reduction and/or growth factor support. Four episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred. Other grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities included abdominal pain/bacteremia in 1 pt in cohort 1; hypokalemia in 1 pt in cohort 2; and DVT in 2 pts, dizziness in 2 pts and fatigue in 1 pt in cohort 3. Using the International uniform response criteria (Durie BG, et al, Leukemia 2006; 20:1467–1473), the best response was documented at a median of 6 (1–5) cycles and included the following: dose level 1 (1 CR, 2 PR); dose level 2 (1 VGPR, 2 PR); dose level 3 (5 CR, 9 VGPR, 9 PR, 1 MR and 1 stable disease). At a median follow-up (F/U) of 12 (8–21) months, 20 pts remain on study, 2 have withdrawn and 9 pts have progressed at a median of 9 (4–13) months; only 1 one has died (due to MM). We conclude: 1) the combination of full doses of the agents in CPR can be given in a 28 day cycle with minimal toxicity; 2) the overall response rate (CR + VGPR + PR) in 31 pts to date is 93%; 3) at a median F/U of 1 year, only 9 pts (29%) have progressed; 4) longer follow-up is required to assess the TTP and survival of the CPR regimen. Disclosures: Reece: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide in combination with drugs other than dexamethasone. Anglin:Celgene: Honoraria. Chen:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria. Mikhael:Celgene: Honoraria. Trudel:Celgene: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Refractory IgD Multiple Myeloma Treated with Daratumumab: A Case Report and Literature Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Husnain ◽  
Sandra Kurtin ◽  
Nikki Barkett ◽  
Irbaz Bin Riaz ◽  
Amit Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Recent Analysis ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma have poor prognosis. A recent analysis of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who were refractory to both proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs showed the median overall survival of 9 months only. Daratumumab is the first-in-class human monoclonal antibody against CD38 cells which was studied in phase I/II trials for treatment of these patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma. It showed an overall response rate of 36% and a median overall survival (OS) of 17 months in these patients. We report a case of 40-year-old man with immunoglobulin D (IgD) multiple myeloma whose disease was refractory to at least 5 different chemotherapy regimens including proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs. The clinical studies assessing daratumumab did not include any patients with IgD myeloma which is a rare form of multiple myeloma and to our knowledge is the first study reporting use of daratumumab in IgD myeloma.

scholarly journals Once weekly selinexor, carfilzomib and dexamethasone in carfilzomib non-refractory multiple myeloma patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Gasparetto ◽  
Gary J. Schiller ◽  
Sascha A. Tuchman ◽  
Natalie S. Callander ◽  
Muhamed Baljevic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Modifications

Abstract Background Proteasome inhibitors (PIs), including carfilzomib, potentiate the activity of selinexor, a novel, first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound, in preclinical models of multiple myeloma (MM). Methods The safety, efficacy, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of selinexor (80 or 100 mg) + carfilzomib (56 or 70 mg/m2) + dexamethasone (40 mg) (XKd) once weekly (QW) was evaluated in patients with relapsed refractory MM (RRMM) not refractory to carfilzomib. Results Thirty-two patients, median prior therapies 4 (range, 1–8), were enrolled. MM was triple-class refractory in 38% of patients and 53% of patients had high-risk cytogenetics del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16) and/or gain 1q. Common treatment-related adverse events (all/Grade 3) were thrombocytopenia 72%/47% (G3 and G4), nausea 72%/6%, anaemia 53%/19% and fatigue 53%/9%, all expected and manageable with supportive care and dose modifications. MTD and RP2D were identified as selinexor 80 mg, carfilzomib 56 mg/m2, and dexamethasone 40 mg, all QW. The overall response rate was 78% including 14 (44%) ≥ very good partial responses. Median progression-free survival was 15 months. Conclusions Weekly XKd is highly effective and well-tolerated. These data support further investigation of XKd in patients with MM.

scholarly journals The MP0250-CP201 Mirror Study: A Phase 2 Study Update of MP0250 Plus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Relapse/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Patients Previously Exposed to Proteasome Inhibitors and Immunomodulatory Drugs

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1899-1899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert Grząśko ◽  
Stefan Knop ◽  
Hartmut Goldschmidt ◽  
Marc S Raab ◽  
Jan Dürig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Grade 3

Background Bone marrow neovascularization is a hallmark of multiple myeloma and progression is associated with a substantial increase in pro-angiogenic factors that promote bone marrow angiogenesis, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). At present, anti-angiogenic agents are not part of treatment strategies in multiple myeloma, neither alone nor in combination with approved agents. MP0250 is a first-in-class, tri-specific multi-DARPin® drug candidate neutralizing VEGF-A and HGF as well as binding to human serum albumin to increase plasma half-life. This is a report on early safety and efficacy of MP0250 in combination with bortezomib plus dexamethasone (Vd) in RRMM patients that have previously been exposed to proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). Aims To assess the efficacy and safety of MP0250 in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with RRMM (MiRRoR, NCT03136653). Trial Design This trial is recruiting adults ≥18 years of age with RRMM who have progressed after at least two prior treatment regimens including bortezomib and an IMiD. Patients were enrolled to receive iv MP0250 on day 1 + subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, 11, oral dexamethasone 20 mg on days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, 11-12 of each 21-day cycle. Patients will receive treatment until there is documented disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Methods The primary endpoint is efficacy in terms of overall response rate (ORR) per International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Secondary endpoints include safety, immunogenicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR). Exploratory endpoints include overall survival, and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory biomarkers for HGF and cMET in bone marrow biopsies are detected by IHC; MM specific markers, circulating HGF and VEGF levels are measured using patient plasma samples. Results As of 01 July 2019, 20 patients (7 ongoing) received a total of 137 doses (1-33 cycles) of MP0250 at the maximum tolerated dose of 8 mg/kg on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with Vd. Median age was 61 years (46-76), median time since diagnosis was 6.7 years. Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 2-9). All 20 patients had prior exposure to IMiDs and PIs and 9 patients received PI-based regimens as their immediate prior line of therapy before start of MP0250 + Vd. Importantly, 6 out of these 9 patients achieved responses ≥ Partial Response (PR). Treatment had been discontinued in 40% of patients due to PD, 15% due to Adverse Event (AE), 5% due to physician's decision and in 1 case at patient's request. The most frequent drug-related grade 3/4 AEs were hypertension in 7/1 patients, thrombocytopenia in 4/1 patients, grade 3 proteinuria in 4 patients and grade 3 anemia in 4 patients. There were no infusion-related reactions. No treatment-related deaths were reported. 20 patients received ≥ 1 dose of MP0250 + Vd and had at least 1 assessment of response and were included in the efficacy analysis. 1 patient (5%) achieved Complete Response, 4 patients achieved Very Good Partial Response (20%) and 3 patients achieved PR (15%) for an ORR of 40%. DOR at cutoff date is 6 months (range, 2-21). Pharmacokinetic data show sustained exposure over multiple cycles with a mean half-life of 11 days (range, 6-17). No indication of ADA-mediated drug clearance was observed. Summary Combining MP250 at 8 mg/kg with standard doses of bortezomib and dexamethasone was generally well tolerated with discontinuation due to AE in only 15% of patients. No unexpected toxicity was observed and AEs consistent with the toxicity profile of the individual agents. Analysis of the preliminary efficacy results showed an encouraging ORR of 40%. Recruitment to this Phase 2 study is ongoing. Disclosures Knop: Janssen, AMGEN, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Stiftung: Research Funding; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Dürig:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel or accommodations, Speakers Bureau. Bringhen:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gamberi:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Castellano Acosta:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Lang:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Lemaillet:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Sudhir:Molecular Partners AG: Employment.

scholarly journals Short Course of Bendamustine and Rituximab Followed By 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan in Patients with Chemotherapy-Naïve Follicular Lymphoma: Results of Fol-Brite

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1733-1733
Author(s):  
Frederick Lansigan ◽  
Bassem I Zaki ◽  
Stephanie P Yen ◽  
Eric S Winer ◽  
Helen Ryan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Conversion Rate ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background: Y90 Ibritumumab tiuxetan (90YIT) is approved for use for follicular lymphoma (FL) patients (pts) who have achieved a complete or partial response to frontline chemotherapy; however, its use after bendamustine and rituximab (BR) has never been studied. BR has proven to be a superior frontline therapy over R-CHOP in the treatment of FL and is a widely used initial treatment strategy. In this prospective, single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II trial, we assessed the response rate and safety of a short induction course of BR for 4 cycles followed by consolidation with 90YIT for chemotherapy-naïve pts with FL. Methods: Consenting pts greater than 18 years with chemotherapy naïve FL (grade 1-2 and 3a) requiring treatment were eligible for this study. All pts had Stage II-IV disease and had adequate hematologic, liver, and renal function. Treatment consisted of an initial dose of rituximab 375mg/m2. One week later, bendamustine 90mg/m2 was administered on days 1 and 2, and rituximab 375mg/m2 was given on day 1. BR was given for 4 cycles every 28 days. Pts were restaged 4-6 weeks after the last dose of BR. Pts were considered eligible for consolidation with 90YIT if they obtained at least a partial response after induction, had a platelet count greater than 100,000/mm3, a granulocyte count greater than 1,500/mm3, and bone marrow infiltration less than 25%. 90YIT was give 6-12 weeks after completion of the last cycle of BR. The primary endpoint of this study is complete and unconfirmed complete response (CR/CRu) rate after sequential therapy with BR followed by 90YIT. Secondary endpoints are overall response rate after 4 cycles of BR, conversion rate from partial response (PR) after BR to CR/CRu after 90YIT, progression-free survival, and safety. The 1999 NHL Working Group Criteria was used to assess response. Results: Forty-two pts were enrolled in this study: 38 pts initiated study treatment, and 4 were screen failures. Median age was 58 years [range 31-74]. The study enrolled FLIPI low (18%), intermediate (47%), high (34%) risk pts; 32 of 38 (84%) were Grade 1-2 and 6 (16%) were Grade 3a. Response rates after 4 cycles of BR: Thirty-eight pts have completed 4 cycles of BR and 38 are evaluable for response. Twenty-two of 38 evaluable pts achieved a CR/CRu (58%) and 15 of 38 pts had a PR (39%) for an overall response rate (ORR) of 97%. One pt had stable disease (SD). Response rates after BR followed by 90YIT: Thirty of 38 BR-treated pts have received 90YIT and are evaluable for the primary endpoint of CR/CRu. Of the 38 BR treated pts, two in CR were unable to receive 90YIT due low platelets, one was not eligible to receive 90YIT due to achievement of SD only, one declined treatment, and four are not yet evaluable for response. Twenty-five of 30 evaluable pts are in CR/CRu (83%), 4 remain in PR (13%) after 90YIT and one progressed during 90YIT, for an ORR of 96%. Of the 14 pts who had a PR after BR, 7 (50%) converted to a CR/CRu immediately after 90YIT, with three (21%) additional conversions to CR/CRu in follow-up, the latest occurring 16 months after 90YIT. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities during BR included: lymphopenia (36%), neutropenia (8%), thrombocytopenia (3%), leukopenia (3%). Non-hematologic toxicities included grade 2 phlebitis (14%) and grade 3 hyperglycemia (8%), hyponatremia (3%), diarrhea (3%), infusion-related reaction (3%), headache (3%), rectal hemorrhage (3%). Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities after 90YIT included: neutropenia (33%), leukopenia (36%), thrombocytopenia (36%), lymphopenia (14%), anemia (3%). Non-hematologic toxicities included skin infection (3%). Median neutrophil recovery was 8 weeks [range 8 to 12] and median platelet recovery was 9 weeks [range 5 to 36] after Y90IT. There have been no incidences of neutropenic fever. One pt developed chronic myelogenous leukemia, occurring 11 months after treatment with BR followed by Y90-IT. There have been no cases of myelodysplasia or acute myelogenous leukemia. Conclusions: In this nearly final analysis, the CR/CRu rate of pts completing all study therapy (BR followed by 90YIT) is 83%, the ORR is 96%, and the conversion rate from PR to CR/CRu is 71%. We conclude that sequential treatment with BR followed by Y90IT is highly effective and safe, and should be considered as a frontline treatment option for FL. Disclosures Lansigan: Teva Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase II Study of the Combination of Daratumumab, Ixazomib, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone As Salvage Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results of a Safety Run-in Analysis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3117-3117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin L. Costello ◽  
Michelle Padilla ◽  
Edward D. Ball ◽  
Carolyn Mulroney
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Observation Period

Background: Triplet combination strategies have widely been accepted as the standard of care for the management of multiple myeloma due to improved outcomes as compared to doublets. The combination of daratumumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone (DPd) has previously demonstrated deep and durable responses, including high rates of MRD negativity, in a heavily pretreated patient population. Quadruplet regimens offer an opportunity to further improve upon these results. We report preliminary findings from an ongoing phase 2 multicenter trial of the addition of ixazomib to the combination of DPd in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The primary objective is to determine overall response rate and the safety and tolerability of this novel regimen. Key secondary endpoints include PFS, OS and MRD negativity rates. Methods: Eligible patients may have received ≥1 and ≤3 prior lines of therapy, have had no prior exposure to daratumumab or ixazomib, and may have not progressed on prior pomalidomide. Patients receive daratumumab 16mg/kg IV weekly x 8 doses, biweekly x 8 doses, then monthly, pomalidomide 4mg PO days 1-21/28, ixazomib 4mg PO days 1,8,15 every 28 days, and dexamethasone 40mg PO weekly. Patients continue on therapy until disease progression, intolerability or preference. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were defined as grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events (AE) or any AE that required a dose modification of pomalidomide or ixazomib at the lowest dose levels on a dose de-escalation plan. An interim safety review was performed after the first 6 patients were enrolled and completed the DLT observation period, which is the first cycle (28 days) since the start of a new dose level of pomalidomide and/or ixazomib. Results: At the time of this analysis, six patients have been enrolled and treated, and completed the DLT observation period. Patients had a median age of 62 (range 52-65) and median number of 2 prior lines of therapy (range 1-2). All patients were refractory to lenalidomide and pomalidomide-naïve. Common adverse events (AEs) included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, GI upset, and upper respiratory infection. Grade 3-4 AEs were predominantly hematologic including neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, but also included grade 3 hypertension in 1 patient, and grade 3 hypophosphatemia, grade 4 hypokalemia, and grade 3 small bowel infection in 1 patient. No IRR > grade 2 occurred with daratumumab administration. No DLTs occurred in the first six patients in the safety run-in. The overall response rate of the cohort is 100% with 3 patients achieving a stringent complete response (CR), and 3 patients achieving a very good partial response (VGPR) after a median of 7 cycles of treatment. One patient discontinued therapy due to influenza A, the other five remain on therapy. Minimal residual disease assessments are being performed by EuroFlow for patients in VGPR or better due to concern for daratumumab interference. Pharmacodynamic changes in patients' tumor microenvironments were established by custom panel mass cytometry to include T-cell memory and activated subpopulations, B-cell content, NK-cell subpopulations as well as MDSCs, Tregs and T-exhaustive markers, monocytes and dendritic cells. Conclusion: The quadruplet regimen DIPd in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma is a well-tolerated combination and has shown early safety in an initial safety run-in analysis. Enrollment continues in an expansion cohort to assess efficacy at multiple sites with the University of California Hematologic Malignancies Consortium. Figure Disclosures Costello: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Daratumumab in Combination with Dexamethasone in Resistant or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Primary Results of the IFM2014-04 Trial

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2138-2138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen Mary Boyle ◽  
Marie-Odile Petillon ◽  
Charles Herbaux ◽  
Johanna Mimouni ◽  
Xavier Leleu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Drug Dosing ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Introduction: CD38 is highly and uniformly expressed on myeloma cells (1). Daratumumab is a human anti-CD38 IgG1κ monoclonal antibody that has previously shown a favourable safety profile as a single agent in patients with relapsed and refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM) (2). This study further assesses the efficacy of Daratumumab in combination with Dexamethasone in heavily pre-treated myeloma patients that are refractory to Lenalidomide, Pomalidomide, and Bortezomib. Methods: This study is an ongoing, open-label phase II study of Daratumumab in combination with Dexamethasone (NCT02626481). Sixty-four, heavily pretreated Patients were recruited in thirty centres in France and Belgium from November 2015, to receive Daratumumab and Dexamethasone. Daratumumab 16 mg/kg was administered weekly during the first two 28-day cycles, every other week during Cycles three through six, and monthly in Cycle seven and beyond until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were all refractory to Lenalidomide (Len), Pomalidomide (Pom) (defined by a progression within 60 days from last drug dosing) and Bortezomib (Bz) (defined by a progression within 6 months from last drug dosing). The primary objective was overall response rate as per the International Myeloma Working Group criteria. A planned safety and efficacy interim analysis was performed after the first 19 patients were enrolled. The last patient was enrolled on the 1stof August 2016. Results: Sixty-four patients were recruited onto the study. The median age (range) at screening was 61 (30-80). The median number (range) of prior lines of therapy was 6 (2-9). Sixty-seven percent of patient had previously received an autologous stem-cell transplant. At the time of screening, 20% of patients (n=13) had a t(4;14) and 12.5% (n=8) a del(17p). Planned interim analysis after the first 19 patients were enrolled did not find any unexpected toxicity. Safety and efficacy results (data cut May 15, 2016) of Daratumumab 16 mg/kg are presented here. No patient discontinued treatment due to Treatment Emergent Adverse Event such as infusion related reactions. Ten (15%) patients discontinued treatment due to disease progression after a median of one-cycle. The most common non-haematological TEAEs included infusion related (IRR, n=5, 8%), and fatigue (n=6, 9.3%). All patients with IRRs recovered and continued to receive treatment. Only six (9.5%) patients experienced hyperthermia. Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were the most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 TEAE (11 and 5% respectively). Planned interim efficacy assessment showed a response rate (defined as a Partial Response (PR) or greater) in 3/19 patients at the end of the first cycle and 4/19 at the end of the second cycle, and a clinically relevant response (Stable Disease (SD) or greater) at the end of the second cycle for 11 of 19 patients, thus meeting the planed futility criteria and enabling the trial to go forward. As per the 15thof May, among the 40 evaluable patients (that had received at least 2 treatment cycles or progressed within the first) the overall response rate (3) was 25%, with eight (20%) partial responses (PR) and two (5%) very good partial responses (VGPRs) after a median of two cycles (range 1-5). An additional seven patients (17.5%) obtained a Minimal Response (MR) according to the EBMT criteria (4). This is consistent with prior results. Updated results will be presented at the time of ASH. Conclusions: Daratumumab in combination with Dexamethasone is a safe treatment option with a favourable benefit/risk profile for the treatment of triple relapsed or refractory (Len, Pom and Bz) myeloma patients. 1. Stevenson GT. CD38 as a Therapeutic Target. Mol Med. 2006;12(11-12):345-6. 2. Lokhorst HM, Plesner T, Laubach JP, Nahi H, Gimsing P, Hansson M, et al. Targeting CD38 with Daratumumab Monotherapy in Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Sep 24;373(13):1207-19. 3. Kyle R, Rajkumar S. Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma. Leuk Off J Leuk Soc Am Leuk Res Fund UK. 2009 Jan;23(1):3-9. 4. Bladé J,et al. Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Myeloma Subcommittee of the EBMT. Br J Haematol. 1998 Sep;102(5):1115-23. Disclosures Boyle: Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Leleu:Novartis: Honoraria; LeoPharma: Honoraria; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; TEVA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hulin:Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol: Honoraria; celgene: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria. Moreau:Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Fohrer:amgen: Consultancy; celgne: Consultancy. Decaux:SIEMENS: Honoraria, Other: supply of free light chain assays , Research Funding; The Binding Site: Other: supply of free light chain assays , Research Funding. Avet-Loiseau:celgene: Consultancy; amgen: Consultancy; janssen: Consultancy; sanofi: Consultancy. Attal:celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; sanofi: Consultancy. Facon:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel and expense, Speakers Bureau.

Bendamustine Combined with Bortezomib Has Efficacy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Phase 1/2 Study

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1857-1857 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Berenson ◽  
Ori Yellin ◽  
Alberto Bessudo ◽  
Ralph V. Boccia ◽  
Stephen J. Noga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
The United States ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Previous Level ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1857 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM), the second most common hematologic cancer in the United States, has a 5-year survival rate of 38%. Bendamustine is a unique alkylating agent with multiple actions leading to cancer cell death in several tumor types. In patients with MM, bendamustine, alone and in combination with prednisone, has been shown to be efficacious, with durable responses. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor approved as monotherapy for MM. It has been found to sensitize highly chemoresistant MM cell lines to alkylating agents such as melphalan. Subsequent clinical trials have reported anti-MM activity and acceptable safety for bortezomib plus melphalan for relapsed or refractory MM and for bortezomib, ascorbic acid, and melphalan (BAM) for patients with newly diagnosed MM. The present phase 1/2 study assessed the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of bortezomib plus bendamustine for patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Methods: All patients were ≥18 years old and had biopsy-confirmed MM, measurable by a serum monoclonal immunoglobulin spike ≥1 gm/dL and/or a urine monoclonal spike ≥200 mg/24 hours. Also, all patients received ≥1 prior MM treatment, not including bendamustine, and showed signs or symptoms of progressive disease, either relapsed (progression following stabilization or response) or refractory (progression during or within 6 months after an antimyeloma regimen). Patients were enrolled in successive groups of 3 to 5. The groups received open-label bendamustine administered as a 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion of 50, 70, or 90 mg/m2 on days 1 and 4 of each 28-day treatment cycle. Each infusion was preceded by bortezomib administered as a 3- to 5-second IV push of 1.0 mg/m2. Bortezomib was also given on days 8 and 11. Enrollment at each dose level was permitted only if the first 3 patients at the previous level received 1 cycle without unacceptable dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). If not, an additional 3 patients would be treated at the previous level (for a maximum 6 at each level). The maximum tolerated dose was defined as the highest dose at which <33% of recipients had unacceptable DLT. Additional patients were then enrolled and were treated to maximum response plus 2 cycles, for a total of up to 8 cycles without progressive disease. Overall response rate (complete, very good partial, partial, and minimal response rates), duration of response, time to progression, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed by International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Results: Because no DLT was observed in phase 1, the bendamustine dosage selected for phase 2 was 90 mg/m2 (plus bortezomib at 1.0 mg/m2). A total of 40 patients (median age, 67.0 years; range, 43–89) were enrolled and had received a median of 6 (range, 2–20) prior therapies, including bortezomib (75%) and alkylators (70%). Following enrollment, 5 patients received a mean (SD) of 3.0 (1.7) cycles of 50 mg/m2 of bendamustine, 4 received 4.0 (2.9) cycles of 70 mg/m2, and 31 received 4.7 (2.8) cycles of 90 mg/m2. Among the 39 patients with efficacy data, the overall response rate was 48.7% (n=19); 53.3% in the subgroup of patients receiving 90 mg/m2 (n=16). Of the 19 responses, 1 was complete (in the 90 mg/m2 group), 2 were very good partial (both in the 90 mg/m2 group), 8 were partial, and 8 were minimal. Another 16 patients (41.0% of 39) had stable disease, and the remaining 4 (10.3%) individuals showed progressive disease. Among all 40 patients, 28 (70.0%) had grade 3 or 4 AEs: 3 of 5 patients (60.0%) receiving 50 mg/m2, 3 of 4 (75.0%) receiving 70 mg/m2, and 22 of 31 (71.0%) receiving 90 mg/m2. There were 3 deaths (unknown/old age, disease progression, and septic shock). Grade 3 or 4 AEs in ≥10% of patients were neutropenia (37.5%), thrombocytopenia (25.0%), anemia (12.5%), and leukopenia (10.0%). Conclusions: In pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory MM, 28-day cycles of bendamustine 90 mg/m2 on days 1 and 4 plus bortezomib 1.0 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 were well tolerated and showed promising efficacy. This research was sponsored by and conducted by Cephalon, Inc., Frazer, PA. Disclosures: Berenson: Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Cephalon, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Bendamustine is FDA-approved for adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that has progressed during or within six months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen. Boccia:Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Noga:Cephalon, Inc.: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Gravenor:Cephalon, Inc.: Research Funding. Siegel:CVS/Caremark: Consultancy; Cephalon, Inc.: Research Funding. Kewalramani:Cephalon, Inc.: Research Funding. Swift:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Mayo:Cephalon, Inc.: Employment.

scholarly journals Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Heavily Pretreated Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2020 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.02259
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Joan Bladé ◽  
Michele Cavo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and rapidly and selectively releases alkylating agents into tumor cells. The phase II HORIZON trial evaluated the efficacy of melflufen plus dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), a population with an important unmet medical need. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with RRMM refractory to pomalidomide and/or an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody received melflufen 40 mg intravenously on day 1 of each 28-day cycle plus once weekly oral dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg (20 mg in patients older than 75 years). The primary end point was overall response rate (partial response or better) assessed by the investigator and confirmed by independent review. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. The primary analysis is complete with long-term follow-up ongoing. RESULTS Of 157 patients (median age 65 years; median five prior lines of therapy) enrolled and treated, 119 patients (76%) had triple-class–refractory disease, 55 (35%) had extramedullary disease, and 92 (59%) were refractory to previous alkylator therapy. The overall response rate was 29% in the all-treated population, with 26% in the triple-class–refractory population. In the all-treated population, median duration of response was 5.5 months, median progression-free survival was 4.2 months, and median overall survival was 11.6 months at a median follow-up of 14 months. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 96% of patients, most commonly neutropenia (79%), thrombocytopenia (76%), and anemia (43%). Pneumonia (10%) was the most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic event. Thrombocytopenia and bleeding (both grade 3/4 but fully reversible) occurred concomitantly in four patients. GI events, reported in 97 patients (62%), were predominantly grade 1/2 (93%); none were grade 4. CONCLUSION Melflufen plus dexamethasone showed clinically meaningful efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM, including those with triple-class–refractory and extramedullary disease.

A Phase I/II Study of Bortezomib and Low Dose Intravenous Melphalan (BM) for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2555-2555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Popat ◽  
Heather E. Oakervee ◽  
Nicola Foot ◽  
Samir Agrawal ◽  
Patricia Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles

Abstract Background: Bortezomib as a single agent has known efficacy in the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma. The overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) was 35% in the SUMMIT study and 46% in the APEX study. In-vitro studies including our own have demonstrated potent synergy with other chemotherapeutic agents such as melphalan. It therefore follows that responses to bortezomib may be further improved by the combination of such drugs. Aims: The primary objectives of this Phase I/II study was to assess the safety, tolerability and response rates in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma; secondary objectives being time to progression (TTP) and overall surival (OS). Methods: This was a multi-centre, non-randomised trial for patients with relapsed myeloma. Patients received bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 on days 1,4,8 and 11 of each 28 day cycle with melphalan on day 2 at increasing dose levels. This was initially at 10mg/m2, but due to cytopenias subsequently at 2.5 and 5mg/m2 (levels 1a, 1 and 2) and we plan to escalate to 7.5mg/m2. Up to 8 cycles were given with dexamethasone added for stable or progressive disease after 4 or 2 cycles respectively. Responses were determined by EBMT criteria. Results: To date, 18 patients have been enrolled (12 male 6 female; median age 60 [range 44–73]; median number of prior therapies 3 [range 1–5] of which 17 have had at least one autologous stem cell procedure with high dose melphalan; 10 prior thalidomide and 2 prior bortezomib). 12 patients received melphalan at 10mg/m2 but due to unacceptable delays predominantly due to thrombocytopaenia, subsequent treatment levels commenced at 2.5mg/m2. The median number of cycles completed thus far is 4 (range 0–8) and of the 16 evaluable, the overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) across all treatment levels was 50% rising to 75% following the addition of dexamethasone as per protocol. At level 1a (melphalan 10mg/m2 ,N=12, median number of cycles completed =5) the best responses (with dexamethasone as indicated) were: 1CR, 1 VGPR, 5 PR, 2 MR; at level 1 (melphalan 2.5mg/m2, N=4) 1 PR, 2 MR (after 2 cycles only). The median time to any response was 1 cycle (range 1–3 ). Three patients have progressive disease, but the median TTP and OS have not yet been reached (median follow-up 3 months). Non-haematological toxicities have been modest with 7 SAEs reported of which only 1 was possibly drug related (myocardial infarction), and 4 episodes of Grade 3 neuropathy (2 resulting in study withdrawal). The commonest grade 3–4 haematological toxicity was thrombocytopaenia (N=10) complicated by bleeding in one patient, followed by neutropenia (N=6). Summary: The combination of bortezomib and intravenous melphalan can be given safely to patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and dose escalation is ongoing. Myelosupression was the commonest grade 3–4 adverse event. A response rate of 50% was seen, which was further improved to 75% with the addition of dexamethasone. This combination may therefore result in higher responses than single agent bortezomib in heavily pretreated patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document