scholarly journals Pembrolizumab and Decitabine for Refractory or Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1437-1437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine E Lindblad ◽  
Julie Thompson ◽  
Gege Gui ◽  
Janet Valdez ◽  
Tatyana Worthy ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The powerful "graft versus leukemia" effect thought partly responsible for the therapeutic effect of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in reducing relapse of high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) provides the rationale for the investigation of immune-based therapy in those with relapsed or refractory AML. There is considerable pre-clinical evidence for potential synergy between PD-1 checkpoint blockade and hypomethylating agents. Aims: To determine the feasibility of a novel combination of pembrolizumab and decitabine in relapsed/refractory adult AML patients. Methods: 17-H-0026, (PD-AML, NCT02996474) was an investigator sponsored, single-institution, single-arm open-label ten subject study approved by the NHLBI IRB and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (FDA IND: 131826). Pembrolizumab 200 milligrams was administered intravenously on day 1 of every three-week cycle, with decitabine 20 milligrams per meter squared administered on days 8-12 and 15-19 (i.e.: total of 10 days) of alternative cycles starting with cycle 1. Up to eight cycles (24 weeks) of therapy were given. Results: Ten high-risk patients (median age 62, range 30-81) were enrolled, seven with refractory disease (including two with therapy-related myeloid neoplasm) and three with early relapse (less than 6 months from completion of last therapy). This novel combination therapy was well tolerated, with a toxicity profile largely consistent with that expected from decitabine. No grade 5 adverse events occurred. Most grade 4 adverse events were hematological. Non-hematological grade 4 events were seen in only two subjects; febrile neutropenia, hypotension and sepsis in one, and sepsis in the other. Two patients suffered from hypothyroidism as an immune-related adverse event (after 2 and 4 cycles respectively) and a third patient developed central diabetes insipidus thought possibly associated with pembrolizumab. In summary, 4 of the 10 patients had stable disease at the end of 8 cycles (24 weeks), 4 progressed prior to cycle 8, 1 patient was taken off study due to grade 4 toxicity (sepsis) in cycle 5 in a morphological leukemic free state (MLFS) and 1 patient achieved an MRD negative complete response at the end of 8 cycles. Specifically, a 74 year-old male patient, enrolled at second relapse, achieved a CR3 lasting 337 days (compared with prior CR2 of 185 days) which was MRD negative at the end of eight cycles, and was still alive 14 months from start of treatment. A 81 year old male patient, with refractory treatment related myeloid neoplasm achieved a MRD-negative MLFS but was removed from study early due to grade 4 toxicity. The 4 patients with stable disease at the end of planned eight cycles included a 71 year-old male patient in early first relapse who decreased blasts from 4.4% at enrollment to 0.1% at the end of 8 cycles. Median overall survival for patients on this study was 7 months (range 2 to ongoing at 14 months) with a median time of follow-up in survivors of 13 months (range 7-14 months). Updated survival data will be reported at the meeting. Additional planned laboratory correlates include assessment of changes in leukemic clonality, T-cell receptor repertoire diversity and bone marrow-resident immune cell profiles during therapy. Conclusion/summary: This first proof of principle study demonstrates the feasibility of the combination of pembrolizumab and decitabine in relapsed/refractory adult AML patients. . Table. Table. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (30) ◽  
pp. 4642-4648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard F. Schlenk ◽  
Konstanze Döhner ◽  
Silja Mack ◽  
Michael Stoppel ◽  
Franz Király ◽  
...  

Purpose To assess the impact of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) from matched related donors (MRDs) and matched unrelated donors (MUDs) on outcome in high-risk patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) within a prospective multicenter treatment trial. Patients and Methods Between 1998 and 2004, 844 patients (median age, 48 years; range, 16 to 62 years) with AML were enrolled onto protocol AMLHD98A that included a risk-adapted treatment strategy. High risk was defined by the presence of unfavorable cytogenetics and/or by no response to induction therapy. Results Two hundred sixty-seven (32%) of 844 patients were assigned to the high-risk group. Of these 267 patients, 51 patients (19%) achieved complete remission but had adverse cytogenetics, and 216 patients (81%) had no response to induction therapy. Allogeneic HSCT was actually performed in 162 (61%) of 267 high-risk patients, after a median time of 147 days after diagnosis. Graft sources were as follows: MRD (n = 62), MUD (n = 89), haploidentical donor (n = 10), and cord blood (n = 1). The 5-year overall survival rates were 6.5% (95% CI, 3.1% to 13.6%) for patients (n = 105) not proceeding to HSCT and 25.1% (95% CI, 19.1% to 33.0%; from date of transplantation) for patients (n = 162) receiving HSCT. Multivariable analysis including allogeneic HSCT as a time-dependent covariable revealed that allogeneic HSCT significantly improved outcome; there was no difference in outcome between allogeneic HSCT from MRD and MUD. Conclusion Allogeneic HSCT in younger adults with high-risk AML has a significant beneficial impact on outcome, and allogeneic HSCT from MRD and MUD yields similar results.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 33-33
Author(s):  
Yunxiong Wei ◽  
Yaqing Cao ◽  
Xin Jin ◽  
Xiaoyuan He ◽  
Rui Sun ◽  
...  

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplasia (MDS) are usually associated with poor outcomes, especially in high-risk AML/MDS. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only curable option for patients suffering from high-risk AML/MDS. However, there were still many patients relapsed after allo-HSCT, especially for some patients are MRD positive before transplantation. Novel therapy to prevent replase is urgently needed. Both BCL-2 inhibitor, venetoclax (VEN) and hypomethylating agent, decitabine (DEC) possess significant antitumor activity effects against AML/MDS. Administration DEC has been shown to ameliorate GVHD and boost GVL post-transplantation. Several clinical trials have also shown that venetoclax plus decitabine can be a safety and effective salvage treatment for patients with AML/MDS relapsing after allo-HSCT. We therefore conducted a prospective study (ChiCTR1900025374) to exam the tolerability and efficacy of a maintenance therapy low-dose decitabine (LDEC) plus VEN to prevent relapse after allo-HSCT for MRD positive high-risk AML/MDS patients. To our knowledge, this is the first report of venetoclax combined decitabine in this setting. Methods: Six patients with MRD positive high-risk AML (n=5) /MDS(n=1) post transplantation were recruited. Around day 100 post transplantation, all patients received LDEC (15mg/m2 for 3 days) followed by VEN (200mg) on day 1 to 21. Two months is a cycle. The primary end points of this study were rates of Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). The secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs), incidence of cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), incidences of acute GVHD (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) and incidences of viral infection after allo-HSCT. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis Results: Two of the six patients were partial remission (PR) before transplantation, and the remaining 4 patients were MRD+ before transplantation. The median follow-up was 16 (11-26.5) months. Both 2-year OS and 2-year EFS were 83%. The median 2-year EFS time was 16(9-26.5) months, and five patients still EFS alive at the time of this writing. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse after LDEC+VEN was 17% and 2-year non-relapse mortality was 0%. No tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) was observed. The most common AEs were neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenic fever, and fatigue. Grade 2 or 3 adverse events were observed in 33% (2/6). No grade>3 AEs were observed. Acute (any grade) and chronic (limited or extensive) graft-versus-host disease occurred in 67% and 17% of patients, respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of CMV viremia and EBV viremia were 33.3% and 16.7%, respectively. Conclusion: We conclude LDEC+VEN can be administered safely after allo-HSCT, without evidence for increased incidence of GVHD, and this combination demonstrates decreased relapse for MRD positive high-risk AML/MDS patients. This novel maintenance therapy may be a promising way to prevent replase for MRD positive high-risk AML/MDS patients, and the clinical benefits need to be assessed in a comparative prospective trial. Figure Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 1722-1736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayaka Yamaoka ◽  
Mikiko Suzuki ◽  
Saori Katayama ◽  
Daiki Orihara ◽  
James Douglas Engel ◽  
...  

Abstract Chromosomal rearrangements between 3q21 and 3q26 elicit high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which is often associated with elevated platelet and megakaryocyte (Mk) numbers. The 3q rearrangements reposition a GATA2 enhancer near the EVI1 (or MECOM) locus, which results in both EVI1 overexpression and GATA2 haploinsufficiency. However, the mechanisms explaining how the misexpression of these 2 genes individually contribute to leukemogenesis are unknown. To clarify the characteristics of differentiation defects caused by EVI1 and GATA2 misexpression and to identify the cellular origin of leukemic cells, we generated a system to monitor both inv(3) allele-driven EVI1 and Gata2 expression in 3q-rearranged AML model mice. A cell population in which both EVI1 and Gata2 were highly induced appeared in the bone marrows before the onset of frank leukemia. This population had acquired serial colony-forming potential. Because hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) and Mks were enriched in this peculiar population, we analyzed the independent EVI1 and GATA2 contributions to HSPC and Mk. We found that inv(3)-driven EVI1 promotes accumulation of Mk-biased and myeloid-biased progenitors, Mks, and platelets, and that Gata2 heterozygous deletion enhanced Mk-lineage skewing of EVI1-expressing progenitors. Notably, inv(3)-directed EVI1 expression and Gata2 haploinsufficient expression cooperatively provoke a leukemia characterized by abundant Mks and platelets. These hematological features of the mouse model phenocopy those observed in human 3q AML. On the basis of these results, we conclude that inv(3)-driven EVI1 expression in HSPCs and Mks collaborates with Gata2 haploinsufficiency to provoke Mk-lineage skewing and leukemogenesis with excessive platelets, thus mimicking an important feature of human AML.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2777-2777
Author(s):  
Thomas Prebet ◽  
Zhuoxin Sun ◽  
Rhett Ketterling ◽  
Peter L. Greenberg ◽  
Amer M. Zeidan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (tMN) includes t-myelodysplasia (tMDS) and t-acute myeloid leukemia (tAML) and are serious late effects of the treatment of cancer. Prognosis of tMN is poor, related to the increased frequency of adverse cytogenetics and other clinical features which predict poor response to conventional treatment. Over the last years, azacitidine (AZA) has become the standard of treatment for high risk MDS (Silverman, JCO 2002; Fenaux, Lancet Oncol 2009) and has shown efficacy in AML. AZA represents an interesting option for patients with tMN considering its safety profile and its efficacy in poor prognosis subgroups of apparently de novo MDS patients including those with monosomy 7. Most prospective trials of AZA have excluded patients with tMN. Most tMN data are retrospective or registry studies (Bally, Leuk Res 2013). This abstract presents the results of 47 t-MN patients prospectively enrolled as a specific cohort in the E1905 study. Methods E1905 study is a randomized phase 2 study from the North American Leukemia Intergroup (NCT00313586, Prebet , ASH 2010) testing 10 days of AZA (50mg/m2/d s.c.) vs. 10 days of AZA + the histone deacetylase inhibitor entinostat (4 mg/m2/d PO days 3 and day 10). 6 cycles of treatment were planned; responding patients could receive up to 24 cycles. MDS, CMML, and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes were included. Patients with tMN were subsequently accrued as a separate cohort after amendment of the protocol. Response was assessed using IWG 2000 criteria (Cheson et al, Blood 2000); the primary endpoint of the overall trial was achievement of a normal hemogram in 25% of treated patients in either treatment arm. Results A total of 47 patients were included. Median age was 70 years (39y-83y), 45% male, and 94% of patients had ECOG PS 0-1. 29 patients could be subclassified as t-MDS and 18 as t-AML. At inclusion, median peripheral blood counts were: neutrophils 1.0 G/l, Platelets 35 G/L, Hemoglobin 9.2 g/l, peripheral blood blasts 0%, marrow blasts 14.0%. 68% of patients were RBC transfusion dependent and 40% platelet transfusion dependent. As expected, the cytogenetic evaluation showed a high frequency of unfavorable risk cytogenetics (74%) as compared to normal or intermediate risk cytogenetics (26%). Baseline characteristics were not statistically different between the 2 arms. 24 patients were treated with AZA monotherapy and 23 with AZA+entinostat. The median number of administered cycles was 4 and was significantly higher in patients treated with AZA monotherapy (6 cycles vs.3 cycles, p=0.008). 8 patients in the combination arm and 1 patient in the AZA monotherapy arm died of infection or hemorrhage before cycle 3. In an intent to treat analysis, overall response rates (CR, PR, or trilineage Hematologic improvement) were 11/24 (46%) in AZA monotherapy (95% CI 26 – 67%) and 4/23 (17%) in the combination arm (95% CI 5 – 39%, p=0.06 comparing the two arms). Median overall survival in the two arms were 12.8 months and 5.7 months (p=0.008). Conclusions In this group of very high risk patients with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, the use of the novel 50 * 10 schedule of azacitidine monotherapy appears effective, with response rates comparable to those for patients with de novo MDS/AML treated on the same protocol (74 pts, 40% with unfavorable cytogenetics, ORR=32%, median OS=18 months). Because there are no prospective data examining the approved dose schedule of AZA (75 mg/m2/day * 7 days), it is not clear if this surprisingly high response rate derives from the current extended schedule of lower dose AZA, or would be true with standard dose AZA as well. This high response may enable many of these patients to proceed to allogeneic stem cell transplant. Entinostat combined with azacitidine at the dose and schedule applied in E1905 does not appear to be effective and tolerable as compared to azacitidine alone. Disclosures: Prebet: CELGENE: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Use of azacitidine in acute myeloid leukemia. Gore:CELGENE: Equity Ownership, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2905-2905
Author(s):  
Marta Cabezon ◽  
Joan Bargay ◽  
Blanca Xicoy ◽  
Laura Palomo ◽  
Sílvia Marcé ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of myeloid neoplasms originated in hematopoietic stem cells, characterized by citopenias, dysplasia in one or more cell lines, ineffective hematopoiesis and an increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Treatment of MDS depends on subtype and prognostic category. DNA methyltranferase inhibitors are approved for high risk MDS. Over the past decade, the application of new high-throughput technologies to the study of MDS has led to the identification of several recurrently mutated genes. These include genes producing proteins involved in RNA splicing, DNA methylation, chromatin modification, transcription, DNA repair control, cohesin function, RAS pathway, and DNA replication. There is a significant overlap between the genes mutated commonly in MDS with those found in AML. Mutation status is not widely used to select treatment in MDS. The aim of this study is to define the mutational status of MDS and secondary AML (sAML) patients at diagnosis that have been treated with azacitidine (AZA) to see if it could help to discriminate which patients will respond from those who will not. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study was performed on 36 patients with MDS and sAML treated with AZA. Genomic DNA was obtained from bone marrow at diagnosis. SeqCap EZ and KAPA Library Preparation Kit (Roche) reagents have been used to enrich DNA of 83 genes implicated in myeloid neoplasm. The customized panel has been analyzed in MiSeq Illumina platform with 150bp paired-end reads. Samples were preliminary analyzed using Illumina MiSeq Reporter and Variant Studio softwares. Data from response to treatment and survival have been collected from all patients. RESULTS:The mean depth of the targeted resequencing per base was 685-fold. After filtering all the variations obtained for quality, biological consequence and discard the known SNPs, we have obtained 162 variations, including 145 single nucleotide variants (SNV) and 17 insertions/deletions. All patients harbored at least 1 alteration with a mean of 4.5 variants per sample. The average of alterations detected in each cytological category can be observed in Table 1.Table 1.Average abnormalities detected by cytological category.Nº patientsAverage of alterations detected for patient (range)sAML104,8 (1-8)RAEB-274,9 (2-8)RAEB-1123,7 (1-6)RCDM54,4 (3-7)RCDM-RS16RARs11The most frequent altered genes have been TP53, TET2 and DNMT3A. The numbers of variations detected for each gene are represented in Table 2.Complete results, including correlation with treatment response will be presented in the meeting.Table 2.Number of variations in each gene.GeneNº of variations foundNº of diferent variationsNº of patients with variationsFrequency of variationsTP5322191952,8%TET214101027,8%DNMT3A88822,2%CREBBP75719,4%SRSF271719,4%ASXL165616,7%U2AF162616,7%EP30053513,9%STAG255513,9%CUX144411,1%ETV643411,1%MLL (KMT2A)43411,1%RUNX14438,3%BCOR3338,3%CDH133338,3%CTNNA13238,3%EZH23338,3%GCAT3338,3%MLL2 (KMT2D)3338,3%NF13338,3%PDGFRB3338,3%SH2B33338,3%TGM23238,3%UMODL13338,3%CEBPA2125,6%CSF3R2225,6%GATA22125,6%PHLPP12225,6%RAD212225,6%SF3B12125,6%SUZ122225,6%TIMM502125,6%Others*1112,8%*ABL1, BCORL1, CALR, CDH3, IDH2, KRAS, LUC7L2, NPM1, NRAS, PHF6, SF3A1, SFPQ, SMC3, TERT, WT1, ZRSR2. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted deep-sequencing technique is a good tool to study mutational profile in MDS and sAML. SNV are the most frequent type of alteration found in our cohort. The patients with sAML and RAEB-2 present more variations than patients with RAEB-1. The rest of groups are less representing to be evaluated. The most affected genes match with those described in the literature, with some exceptions that need to be studied in more detail. We expect to predict in advance which patients are going to respond when we study the correlation of mutational analysis with treatment response. Acknowledgments: Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Spain (PI 11/02519); 2014 SGR225 (GRE) Generalitat de Catalunya; Fundació Josep Carreras, Obra Social "La Caixa" and Celgene Spain. Diana Domínguez for her technical assistance Disclosures Valcarcel: Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
kaixun hu ◽  
Mei Guo ◽  
Chang-Lin Yu ◽  
Jian-Hui Qiao ◽  
Qi-Yun Sun ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundThe treatment outcomes of elderly patients aged over 70 with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have been very disappointing. In comparison, our designed HLA-mismatched hematopoietic stem cell micro-transplantation (MST) has achieved such encouraging treatment results in AML patients as might warrant further investigations of the outcomes of MST for the above mentioned patients. MethodsOne hundred and eleven patients aged 70-88 years were enrolled. Eighty patients were assigned to the high-risk MST or standard MST group according to high-risk prognostic factors. The other thirty-one patients were assigned to either the chemotherapy group or support group. After receiving induction chemotherapy with cytarabine and anthracycline, patients who achieved complete remission (CR) were given another 2 cycles of post-remission therapy with cytarabine. Each chemotherapy regimen was followed by donor stem cell infusion in the MST groups. ResultMST achieved an encouragingly high CR rate in patients (63.8%), even in high-risk patients (54%). It was significantly higher than that in the chemotherapy alone group. The 1-year overall survival (OS) of MST patients was 57.7% and was 68.6% in the high-risk and standard group, respectively, whereas the OS was only 37.3% in the chemotherapy group. The severe infection rate was 36% and 54% in MST and chemotherapy group. No GVHD was observed in MST patients. A larger updated T cell clones was observed in MST patients by T cell receptor repertoire analysis with a Next Generation Sequencing methodology. ConclusionsThese results suggested that MST is a safe and practical treatment regimen conducive to a longer-term survival for AML patients at a highly advanced age.


Author(s):  
S. N. Bondarenko ◽  
I. S. Moiseev ◽  
I. A. Samorodova ◽  
T. L. Gindina ◽  
M. A. Kucher ◽  
...  

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) and chemotherapy (CT) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first remission (CR1), to identify factors influencing the results. We compare the efficacy alloHSCT in CR1 (n = 70) and CT (n = 52). Patients were stratified by age, the level of leucocytes, the origin of AML, cytogenetic risk group and response to induction CT. Five-years overall and disease-free survival (OS and DFS) were higher in the group alloHSCT (67 and 65 % vs 46 and 30 % (p = 0.02 and p = 0.001)). Benefits of DFS after alloHSCT was in standard and high-risk cytogenetic groups (78 % versus 29 % (p = 0.001), and 34 % vs 17 % (p = 0.007)). The risk of relapse (RR) was 24 % in patients after alloHSCT vs. 57 % for CT (p = 0.003). Comparing the RR after alloHSCT and CT depending on the cytogenetic risk groups: standard (HR0.2(CI95 %0.07 - 0.56) p = 0.002), and high (HR0.27(CI95 %0.08-0.86) p = 0.03). Additional factors affect the RR were the origin of AML (de novo) (HR0.47 (CI95 %0.3-0.74) p = 0.001), the hyperleukocytosis (HR1.91 (CI95 %1.09 - 3.32) p = 0.02), and no remission after the first course CT (HR3.32(CI95 %1.57-7.0) p = 0.002). The efficacy of alloHSCT compared with CT is higher both in standard and high-risk cytogenetic group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document