scholarly journals A Successful Experience with Brentuximab Vedotin in Relapsing/Refractory Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: Two Case Reports

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5371-5371
Author(s):  
Liliya Gorenkova ◽  
Sergey K. Kravchenko ◽  
Alla M. Kovrigina ◽  
Valery G. Savchenko
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Allogeneic Bone ◽  
Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Anaplastic Lymphoma ◽  
Frequent Relapses

Abstract Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas are non-Hodgkin lymphomas of the skin defined by the presence of malignant T lymphocyte clonality. Mycosis fungoides (MF) accounts for more than half of these lymphomas, while CD30+ lymphoproliferative skin diseases (primary cutaneous anaplastic lymphoma and lymphomatiod papulosis (LyP)) comprise 25% of these neoplasms, and rarely seen tumors including subtypes of primary cutaneous peripheral T cell lymphoma nonspecified (NOS). A high expression of CD30 antigen on tumor cells is detected in primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphomas and transformed MF, whereas it may be observed in other entities, but a low level. While most patients with cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders experience an indolent disease course with an excellent prognosis, up to 30% have progressive disease with 8% of patients succumbing to their cancer. Systemic immunomodulatory or chemotherapeutic agents are often used for patients with such advanced disease, with CD30 being an increasingly attractive therapeutic target. Herein, we report two cases of a relapsing lymphomatiod papulosis and a refractory primary cutaneous peripheral T cell lymphoma NOS. Target therapy with brentuximab vedotin either as a single agent or combined with chemotherapy resulted in a stable long-term remission. Patient 1, a man of 45 years of age, received treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma about 5 years ago. Already at that time, he noted self-regressing crops of pruritic papules or nodules on the face. In a year after chemotherapy had stopped, this skin elements recurrent with subsequent partial regression. LyP type D was identified on histological examination (picture 1). Following several lines of therapy, frequent relapses were noted and a lesser quantity of lesions tended to resolve leaving scars and hyperpigmentation. The complete remission was achieved after 6 cycles of brentuximab vedotin, at a follow-up period of 12 months no evidence of relapse were found (picture 2). Patient 2, a 30-year aged man. First solitary skin lesions occurred 2.5 years ago. The patient received combination therapy with low doses of chemotherapeutic agents and subsequently had progression of the disease. The patient received more 3 lines of high-dose chemotherapy; however, the disease was rapidly progressive with increasing size of lesions and newly appearing tumor lesions in the skin (picture 3). The remission was achieved after a combination regimen which included Dexa Beam courses and brentuximab vedotin (picture 4). The matched allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is planned for the patient to consolidate the remission. Figure. Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Brentuximab vedotin in The Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory CD30+ Peripheral T‐cell Lymphoma: a FIL Phase 2 Study

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vittorio Stefoni ◽  
Cinzia Pellegrini ◽  
Lisa Argnani ◽  
Paolo Corradini ◽  
Anna Dodero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 2 Study

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma after Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 33-34
Author(s):  
Olivier Veilleux ◽  
Francisco Socola ◽  
Sally Arai ◽  
Robert Lowsky ◽  
Judith A Shizuru ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Autologous Transplant ◽  
Support Research

Introduction: Patients with T-cell lymphoma have variable clinical manifestations and outcomes depending on the histology and their response to therapies. However, the overall outcomes are not as good as their B-cell lymphoma counterpart with induction chemotherapy alone. Therefore, autologous transplant is often used as consolidation in first remission or at relapse because of the poor outcomes with conventional therapy. We have reported previously on Stanford experience of these patients who underwent autologous transplant before 2007 (BBMT 2008, 14:741). Here, we reported a retrospective review of patients in the modern era (2008-2018) with emphasis on the impact of pre-transplant disease status on outcomes and post-transplant relapse management. Method: Between July 1, 2008 and July 31, 2018, 102 consecutive patients with T-cell lymphoma received high dose chemotherapy/autologous hematopoietic cell rescue at Stanford and constitute the study cohort (Figure 1). This study cohort was selected for adequate follow-up (>2 years) after transplant. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was estimated from the date of transplant using the Kaplan-Meier method. PFS and OS were compared between groups with different pre-transplant disease status based on response to the last pre-transplant therapies (CR1 vs. PR1 vs. CR2). Result: This study cohort included patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma, non-specified (n=21), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (n=50), ALK-negative anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (n=14), ALK-positive anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (n=5), extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma (n=9), enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma (n=1), adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (n=1) and hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (n=1). It had a male/female ratio of 61/41, and a median age of 58 years (range 23-71). At diagnosis the majority of the patients had stage III/IV disease (70%) and B symptoms (56%). The median time from diagnosis to transplant was 8.1 months (range 4-176). The majority of patients were in first complete remission (CR1, n=79) at the time of transplant, while others were in PR1 (n=11) or in CR2 (n=12) from last pre-transplant therapies. Ninety-one (89%) patients received high dose cyclophosphamide/carmustine/etoposide(CBV) and 11 patients received high dose carmustine/etoposide/cytarabine/melphalan (BEAM) prior to autograft infusion. Median follow-up post-transplant was 36.8 months (range 0.7-130) for the entire cohort. The estimated 3-year PFS and OS were 60% (95% CI 49-68%) and 75% (95% CI 65-82%), respectively (Figure 2A). Patients who were in CR1 had significantly better median PFS compared to patients in PR1 or CR2 (7.04 vs 1.19 years, p=0.039; 7.04 vs 0.48 years p=0.004, Figure 2B). The estimated 3-year PFS were 67% (95% CI 55-76%), 36% (95% CI 11-63%), and 29% (95% CI 8-56%) for the CR1, PR1 and CR2 groups respectively. Patients who were in CR1 also had significantly better median OS compared to patients in PR1 or CR2 (not reached vs 2.30 years, p=0.018; not reached vs 3.76 years p=0.045, Figure 2C).The estimated 3-year OS were 82% (95% CI 71-89%), 44% (95% CI 14-70%), and 53% (95% CI 21-78%) for the CR1, PR1 and CR2 groups respectively. In this cohort, there were no significant differences in either PFS or OS between different histology. Forty patients experienced disease relapse after transplant. The majority (n=28, 70%) of these patients received additional therapies including chemotherapy (n=13), brentuximab vedotin (n=12), HDAC inhibitor (n=7), and radiation (n=3) with a median systemic therapy of 2 (range 1-5). Thirteen patients eventually underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The median OS after post-transplant relapse was 21.3 months (Figure 3). Both brentuximab vedotin and allogeneic transplant seemed to provide prolonged survival for these relapsed patients, with estimated 2-year post-relapse OS were 75% (95% CI 13-96%) and 63% (95% CI 28-84%) for the two groups respectively. Conclusion: Autologous transplant remains to be a good option as consolidation for patients with T-cell lymphoma, mostly in patients with first complete remission. While close to 40% of the patients experienced relapse after autologous transplant, additional therapies such as brentuximab vedotin or/and allogeneic transplant can provide long-term benefit for these patients. Disclosures Shizuru: Jasper Therapeutics, Inc: Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shiraz:Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding; ORCA BioSystems: Research Funding. Muffly:Servier: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Adaptive: Research Funding. Sidana:Janssen: Consultancy. Meyer:Orca Bio: Research Funding. Rezvani:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Miklos:Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Allogene Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Juno-Celgene-Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotech: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Negrin:Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Biosource: Current equity holder in private company; Amgen: Consultancy; BioEclipse Therapeutics: Current equity holder in private company; UpToDate: Honoraria; KUUR Therapeutics: Consultancy.

scholarly journals A randomized phase 3 trial of auto vs. allo transplantation as part of first-line therapy in poor-risk peripheral T-NHL

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert Schmitz ◽  
Lorenz H Truemper ◽  
Krimo Bouabdallah ◽  
Marita Ziepert ◽  
Mathieu Leclerc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
First Line ◽  
High Dose Therapy ◽  
Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Standard first-line therapy for younger patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma consists of six courses of CHOP or CHOEP consolidated by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (AutoSCT). We hypothesized that consolidative allogeneic transplantation (AlloSCT) could improve outcome. 104 patients with nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma except ALK+ ALCL, 18 to 60 years of age, all stages and IPI scores except stage 1 and aaIPI 0, were randomized to receive 4 x CHOEP and 1 x DHAP followed by high-dose therapy and AutoSCT or myeloablative conditioning and AlloSCT. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS) at three years. After a median follow-up of 42 months, 3-year EFS of patients undergoing AlloSCT was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29%; 57%) as compared to 38% (95% CI: 25%; 52%) after AutoSCT. Overall survival at 3 years was 57% (95% CI: 43%; 71%) versus 70% (95% CI: 57%; 82%) after AlloSCT or AutoSCT, without significant differences between treatment arms. None of 21 responding patients proceeding to AlloSCT as opposed to 13 of 36 patients (36%) proceeding to AutoSCT relapsed. Eight of 26 patients (31%) and none of 41 patients died due to transplant-related toxicity after allogeneic and autologous transplantation, respectively. In younger patients with T-cell lymphoma standard chemotherapy consolidated by autologous or allogeneic transplantation results in comparable survival. The strong graft-versus-lymphoma effect after AlloSCT was counterbalanced by transplant-related mortality. CHO(E)P followed by AutoSCT remains the preferred treatment option for transplant-eligible patients. AlloSCT is the treatment of choice for relapsing patients also after AutoSCT.

Safe and Effective Treatment of Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) with the Novel HDAC Inhibitor, Belinostat, in Combination with CHOP: Results of the Bel-CHOP Phase 1 Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 253-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick B. Johnston ◽  
Amanda F. Cashen ◽  
Petros G. Nikolinakos ◽  
Anne W Beaven ◽  
Stefan Klaus Barta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Anaplastic Lymphoma ◽  
Not Otherwise Specified ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas associated with poor prognosis and repeated recurrence for most subtypes. Currently, anthracycline-based therapies such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) or CHOP-like therapies are recommended as the first-line treatment for PTCL, but the prognosis remains poor with most patients relapsing within 5 years. Thus, improved treatment strategies are still needed. Belinostat is a potent, pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor that was recently approved in the United States for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL (R/R PTCL). Approval was based on results from the pivotal Phase 2 BELIEF study (O'Connor et al, JCO, 2015) of belinostat in R/R PTCL, which demonstrated durable clinical benefit (objective response rate [ORR] 25.8%) and tolerability. Since belinostat (Bel) and each of the components of the CHOP regimen target different aspects of the cell cycle with different mechanisms of action, there is potential for a synergistic effect of a Bel-CHOP combination treatment regimen for patients with PTCL. Methods: Patients with PTCL received CHOP in association with 1000 mg/m2 of belinostat on various schedules, repeated every 21-days for up to 6 cycles. The cohort schema followed a traditional "3+3" dose escalation design. The objective of Part A of the study was to determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of the Bel-CHOP combination. Once the MTD was determined, at least 10 more patients were to be treated in the Expansion Phase (Part B). Belinostat was to be administered as a 1000 mg/m2 IV infusion once daily for up to 5 days, depending on the assigned cohort (Fig 1). The starting cohort was Cohort 3 (CHOP + 1000 mg/m2 of daily belinostat on Days 1-3). Patients received primary prophylaxis with growth factor (G-CSF) support. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were considered during the 1st cycle and included: non-hematological toxicity Grades 3-4, platelet count < 25 X 109/L at any time or ANC < 0.5 X 109/L lasting more than 7 days despite G-CSF administration. The primary endpoint of the study was the determination of the MTD of the Bel-CHOP combination. Secondary endpoints included safety, tolerability and ORR (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) and pharmacokinetics. Results: A total of 23 patients were enrolled in the study, 11 of which were treated in Part A. One patient in Part A was deemed inevaluable because the patient died due to disease progression before completing Cycle 1. The MTD was determined to be 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1-5 (Cohort 5); 12 more patients were then treated at this dose level (Part B). The only DLT experienced in the study was in Cohort 3 (Grade 3 Nausea and Vomiting). At the time of this abstract, 18/23 patients (78%) have completed all 6 cycles of Bel-CHOP, with 87% completing at least 4 cycles. Ten patients (43%) had at least one serious adverse event (SAE) and 18 (78%) had at least one Grade 3 or 4 adverse event (AE). The most frequent Grade 3/4 AEs were hematological in nature: neutrophil count decreased (26%), anemia (22%), neutropenia (17%) and white blood cell count decreased (17%). The ORR for the18 patients that have completed an End of Study Visit is 89% (16/18), with the vast majority achieving a CR [72% (n=13)], and 17% (n=3) a PR. Progressive disease was reported in 2 patients. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that the combination of belinostat with CHOP (Bel-CHOP) is well tolerated, with all components of CHOP and belinostat being given at their standard therapeutic doses. The rates of AEs were consistent with those typically reported with CHOP alone, and clinical activity was demonstrated with a response rate of 89% based on 18 evaluable patients. Thus, Bel-CHOP is a promising new regimen in PTCL that will be further tested in a Phase 3 randomized trial. Table. Table. Figure 1. Summary of Demographic and Baseline Characteristics AITL= angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma; ALCL =anaplastic large-cell lymphoma; ALK = anaplastic lymphoma kinase; NOS = not otherwise specified Figure 1. Summary of Demographic and Baseline Characteristics. / AITL= angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma; ALCL =anaplastic large-cell lymphoma; ALK = anaplastic lymphoma kinase; NOS = not otherwise specified Disclosures Barta: Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Bhat:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment. Song:Spectrum Pharmaceutical, Inc: Employment. Choi:Apectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment. Allen:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment. Foss:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals; Celgene: Seattle Genetics: Infinity; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Brentuximab Vedotin Followed By Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Patients with CD30 Anaplastic or T Cell Non Hodgkin Lymphomas: A Study on Behalf of the SFGM-TC.

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4377-4377
Author(s):  
Sylvain Garciaz ◽  
Michael Loschi ◽  
Adele de Masson ◽  
Sylvie François ◽  
Cecile Tomowiak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Immunosuppressive Agents ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Salvage Treatment ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma

Abstract Brentuximab vedotin (BV), an anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate, has demonstrated efficacy alone or in combination with chemotherapy in CD30 refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL). It has been approved in anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) and promising results have also been published in other CD30 positive T-cell lymphomas such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) or peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). In patients with relapsing or refractory NHL, BV has mainly been proposed as a bridge for autologous or allogeneic transplantation (Allo-HSCT). Very few data are available about patients with T-cell NHL receiving Allo-HSCT after BV. The aim of our study was to study safety and efficacy of this procedure in a retrospective series of patients treated on behalf of SFGM-TC. Inclusion criteria were: - CD30 positive T cell NHL including ALCL, CTCL and PTCL, - Partial or Complete response after BV treatment, - Allogeneic HSCT performed after BV as last salvage treatment. BV was administered at 1,8mg/kg dose every 3 weeks in outpatient department. Allo-HSCT was performed according to institutional guidelines. Twenty-six patients receiving Allo-HSCT in France after salvage therapy including BV were identified. Patients characteristic are summarized in Table 1. With a median follow-up of 13 months (1.5-40), 8 patients relapsed and 7 patients died. Two-year OS and PFS were respectively 76% and 47%. Among patients with ALCL (n=15) 2 patients relapsed and 2 patients died. Whereas in the CTCL group (n=5), 5 patients relapsed and 1 patient died and in the PTCL group (n=6), 1 patient relapsed and 4 patients died. Two-year OS were 93%, 80% and 21% (p<0.001) and two-year PFS were 86%, 20% and 0% (p<0.001) for ALCL, CTCL and PTCL respectively. Two-years PFS for patients in CR before Allo-HSCT (n=16) was 67% whereas patients in PR (n=6) or who progressed before transplantation (n=3) have a 25% and 0% 2-years PFS respectively (p=0,08). In multivariate analysis, only anaplastic histology had a positive impact on OS or PFS. We compared data with a control group of patients with T-cell NHL (n=52) transplanted in the same centers during the same period, not receiving BV as a salvage treatment. Day-100 cumulative incidence of acute Grade 2-4 GVHD and Grade 3-4 GVHD were 39% [20-59] and 16% [1-30] in the BV group and 46% [27-66] and 19% [8-30] in the control group (p=NS). Two-years overall chronic GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD were 33% [9-56] and 22% [0-46] in the BV group and 39% [24-53] and 15% [0-26] in the control group (p=NS). Day-100 and 1-year NRM were 12% [0-25] and 16% [1-30] in the BV group and 4% [0-9] and 8% [1-15] in the control group (p=0,07). One-year relapse incidence was 37% [14-60] and 22% [10-34] in the BV and control groups respectively (p=0,27). BV was not associated with higher GVH, NRM or relapse incidence in multivariate analysis. In conclusion, BV followed by Allo-HSCT is an option for patients with advanced CD 30 positive T cell NHL. Immunotherapy targeting CD30 before Allo-HSCT is not associated with a higher rate of GVHD, NRM or relapse incidence. Patients with ALCL have a better survival than patients with PTCL or CTCL. Table 1. Patients characteristics All patients ALCL CTCL PTCL (n=26) (n=15) (n=5) (n=6) Sexe male 15 (58%) 7 (47%) 4 (80%) 4 (67%) Age (at Allo-HSCT) median (range) 47 (21-62) 40 (21-59) 50 (31-62) 50 (46-59) Stade (at diagnosis) I-II 4 (15%) 3 (20%) - 1 (17%) III-IV 16 (62%) 11 (73%) - 5 (83%) unknown 1 (4%) 1 (7%) - - NA 5 (19%) - 5 (100%) - Auto-HSCT (before BV) patients 8 (31%) 5 (33%) - 3 (50%) Lines of chemotherapy (before BV) median (ranges) 2 (1-7) 2 (1-4) 4 (3-7) 2 (1-3) Status (before BV) refractory 18 (69%) 9 (60%) 5 (100%) 4 (66%) relapsing 8 (31%) 6 (40%) - 2 (34%) cycles of BV median (ranges) 4 (1-8) 4 (1-8) 4 (4-6) 4 (1-4) Treatment associated with BV no 20 (77%) 11 (73%) 5 (100%) 4 (66%) GVD 2 (8%) 2 (13%) - - CHP 2 (8%) - - 2 (33%) DHAP 1 (4%) 1 (7%) - - Radiotherapy 1 (4%) 1 (7%) - - Time between diagnosis and Allo-HSCT Months (range) 21 (6-93) 13 (6-93) 23 (21-43) 23 (12-76) Status before Allo-HSCT CR 16 (62%) 13 (87%) - 3 (50%) PR 6 (23%) 2 (13%) 4 (80%) - SD/PD 3 (12%) - 1 (20%) 2 (33%) Donor type MRD 15 (57%) 5 (33%) 4 (80%) 6 (100%) MUD 7 (27%) 6 (40%) 1 (20%) - CBU 2 (8%) 2 (13%) - - Haploidentical 2 (8%) 2 (13%) - - Conditioning 3 (50%) RIC 17 (65%) 9 (60%) 5 (100%) MAC 9 (35%) 6 (40%) - 3 (50%) Immunosuppressive agents CyA 5 (19%) 4 (27%) - 1 (17%) CyA/MMF 10 (38%) 4 (27%) 5 (100%) 1 (17%) CyA/MTX 11 (42%) 7 (47%) - 4 (66%) Anti-thymocyte globulin 11 (42%) 8 (53%) 1 (20%) 2 (33%) Disclosures Off Label Use: Brentuximab used for CD30+ cutaneous and peripheral T cell lymphoma.

scholarly journals Frontline Brentuximab Vedotin Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Prednisone in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma with Less Than 10% CD30 Expression (SGN35-032, Trial in Progress)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1401-1401
Author(s):  
Deepa Jagadeesh ◽  
Scott Knowles ◽  
Steven M. Horwitz
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Time To Event ◽  
Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Abstract Background Brentuximab vedotin (BV) was the first antibody-drug conjugate to be approved in multiple cancer types (Gauzy-Lazo 2020). The combination of a CD30-directed monoclonal antibody, a protease-cleavable linker, and the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E drives the anticancer activity of BV by inducing CD30-targeted cell cycle arrest and apoptosis as well as the bystander effect on adjacent cells (Sutherland 2006, Hansen 2016, Schönberger 2018). In the ECHELON-2 phase 3 clinical trial, BV, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (A+CHP) showed efficacy in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) across a range of CD30 expression levels, including the lowest eligible level of 10% by immunohistochemistry when compared with patients treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) (Advani 2019). It is hypothesized that A+CHP will demonstrate efficacy in PTCL with &lt;10% CD30 expression because i) clinical responses to BV have occurred in patients with PTCL, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, or B-cell lymphoma with low (&lt;10%) and undetectable CD30 expression (Jagadeesh 2019) and ii) CD30 expression levels were not predictive of A+CHP responses in non-systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL) (Advani 2019). Study Design and Methods SGN35-032 is a dual-cohort, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial (NCT04569032) designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of A+CHP in patients with non-sALCL PTCL and CD30 expression of &lt;10% on tumor cells. Up to approximately 40 patients will be enrolled in each of the CD30-negative (expression &lt;1%) and the CD30-low (expression ≥1% to &lt;10%) cohorts. Patients will be enrolled based on local results but only patients with CD30 expression &lt;10% per central confirmation will be analyzed for the primary and secondary endpoints. Patients will receive 21-day cycles of A+CHP for 6-8 cycles. Key inclusion criteria include adults with newly diagnosed PTCL, excluding sALCL, per the World Health Organization 2016 classification; CD30 expression &lt;10% by local assessment; and fluorodeoxyglucose-avid disease by positron emission tomography (PET) and measurable disease of at least 1.5 cm by computed tomography (CT), as assessed by the site radiologist. Patients with previous exposure to BV or doxorubicin will not be eligible. The primary endpoint of this trial is objective response rate (ORR) per blinded independent central review (BICR) using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Secondary endpoints include ORR by BICR using the modified Lugano criteria (Cheson 2014), complete response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response per BICR using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007), overall survival, and safety and tolerability. A PET scan is required at baseline, after Cycle 4, and after the completion of study treatment. Follow-up restaging CT scans will be performed over the next 2 years. In both the CD30-negative and the CD30-low cohorts, efficacy and safety endpoints will be summarized using descriptive statistics to describe continuous variables by cohort. Time-to-event endpoints, such as PFS, will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methodology and KM plots will be presented. Medians for time-to-event analyses (e.g., median PFS) will be presented and two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated using the log-log transformation method. Enrollment is planned for 15 US sites and 32 sites across the Czech Republic, France, Italy, and the UK. Disclosures Knowles: Seagen Inc.: Current Employment. Horwitz: ADC Therapeutics, Affimed, Aileron, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Forty Seven, Inc., Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Millennium /Takeda, Seattle Genetics, Trillium Therapeutics, and Verastem/SecuraBio.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Acrotech Biopharma, Affimed, ADC Therapeutics, Astex, Merck, Portola Pharma, C4 Therapeutics, Celgene, Janssen, Kura Oncology, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Myeloid Therapeutics, ONO Pharmaceuticals, Seattle Genetics, Shoreline Biosciences, Inc, Takeda, Trillium Th: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Crispr Therapeutics: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Forty Seven, Inc.: Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; Myeloid Therapeutics: Consultancy; ONO Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Secura Bio: Consultancy; Shoreline Biosciences, Inc.: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Trillium Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Tubulis: Consultancy; Verastem/Securabio: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document