scholarly journals Switching Towards Monocytic Lineage and Discordancy between Flow Cytometric and PCR Minimal Residual Disease Results Is a Hallmark Feature of DUX4 Rearranged B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2825-2825
Author(s):  
Michaela Novakova ◽  
Barbora Vakrmanova ◽  
Lucie Slamova ◽  
Alena Musilova ◽  
Monika Brüggemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Cell Precursor ◽  
Treatment Protocols ◽  
Monocytic Lineage ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Introduction: Recently we described a subgroup of pediatric patients with B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP ALL) with switching from B to monocytic lineage in early phase of the therapy (Slamova et al., 2014). In a limited cohort of patients with switching ALL (swALL), we observed inferior response to treatment with discrepancy of minimal residual disease level (MRD) assessed by flow cytometry (FC) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of Immunoglobulin-T cell receptor (Ig-TCR) rearrangements. In current Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM) treatment protocols, FC MRD value at day 15 (d15) and PCR MRD value at day 33 (d33) and week 12 (w12) are used for stratification. Using an extended cohort of patients with available RNA sequencing data (cohort mainly focused on B other cases or swALLs) we aimed to answer following questions:What is the genetic background of swALL? What is the frequency among swALLs of the recently described DUX4 rearranged subgroup?How do B cell oriented FC and PCR MRD correlate in standard protocol timepoints, i.e. day 8 (d8) (peripheral blood, PB) d15, d33 and w12 (bone marrow, BM) of treatment?What is the characteristic MRD response to treatment in swALL? Results:We performed RNA sequencing in 177 patients (median age 6.1 years, range 0-18) treated by several treatment protocols (ALL BFM 95 n=5, ALL IC BFM 2002 n=14, ALL AIEOP BFM 2000 n=17, ALL AIEOP BFM 2009 n=135, Interfant n=3, ALL IC/Interfant n=2, EsPhALL n=1). In 68 patients we observed switching phenomenon by appearance of B/monocytoid population coexpressing B lineage (CD19, CD34) and monocytic lineage (CD33, CD14) markers (median 0.98%, range 0.032-38%). In non swALLs median of this population was 0.059% (range 0.0025-1.1%) and the cells did not form a clear cluster. According to RNAseq data, majority of swALL patients (n=42/68) belong to DUX4 subgroup (chi square p< 0.00001). The distribution into other molecular genetic subtypes is summarized in table 1.Correlation coefficient (Spearman) of all included samples with both available values (n=552) was 0.82 (p<0.0001), Concordance in categorization of positivity and negativity with cut-off 1e-4 was 85%. We observed worse correlation between FC and PCR MRD in patients with swALL (d8 R=0.58, d15 R=0.6, d33 R=0.36, w12 n.s.) compared to non swALL (d8 R=0.83, d15 R=0.91, d33 R=0.69, w12 R=0.37). However, concordance in swALL in categorization of positivity and negativity with cut-off 1e-4 was still ≥80% in each analyzed timepoint apart from d33 with concordance only 44% showing significant discrepancy of both methods (Figure 1a). On the contrary, concordance in non swALL was ≥87% for each analyzed timepoint (d33 with concordance 87% shown in Figure 1b). Poor correlation between B-cell oriented FC MRD and PCR MRD at d33 was also obvious when analyzed DUX4 subgroup separately (R=0.31 (p=0.04), concordance 45%).We observed significantly higher MRD in swALLs compared to non swALLs at all analyzed timepoints: d8 (p=0.0021), d15 (p=0.0088, d33 (p<0.0001) and w12 (p=0.008). Higher MRD levels were also found in DUX4 patients when compared to non DUX4 (all timepoints p<0.05). Interestingly, when compared swALL and non swALLs pts in DUX4 subgroup only, the DUX4 swALLs are those with poorer treatment response (all timepoints p<0.05). With respect to protocolar cut-off values, FC MRD at d15 was above 10% in 18/67 swALL patients (in 13/52 DUX4 patients), d33 PCR MRD was above 0.1% in 33/57 swALLs (24/44 DUX4 pts) and at w12 PCR MRD was above 0.01% in 12/55 swALLs (10/44 DUX4 pts). Conclusions: DUX4 subgroup is the most prevalent genetic subtype among swALLs. SwALLs and/or DUX4 subgroup have poorer treatment response at d15, d33 and w12. However, it remains to be elucidated whether poor initial treatment response is eventually reflected in treatment outcome. In majority of swALL patients B cell phenotype of blasts is preserved at day 15 enabling correct classification. Prominent discrepancy between FC and PCR MRD is present especially at d33 and development of different FC MRD strategies focused on monocytic compartment is needed. Supported by Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic, grant nr. 15-28525A and NV18-03-00343; Czech Science Foundation nr. P302/12/G101, UNCE204012 Disclosures Brüggemann: Affimed: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy; PRMA: Consultancy. Ritgen:abbvie: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Curative outcomes following blinatumomab in adults with minimal residual disease B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (11) ◽  
pp. 2665-2673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Gökbuget ◽  
Gerhard Zugmaier ◽  
Hervé Dombret ◽  
Anthony Stein ◽  
Massimiliano Bonifacio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Cell Precursor ◽  
Minimal Residual

scholarly journals IKZF1plus Defines a New Minimal Residual Disease–Dependent Very-Poor Prognostic Profile in Pediatric B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 1240-1249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Stanulla ◽  
Elif Dagdan ◽  
Marketa Zaliova ◽  
Anja Möricke ◽  
Chiara Palmi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Cell Precursor ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Profile ◽  
Minimal Residual

Purpose Somatic deletions that affect the lymphoid transcription factor–coding gene IKZF1 have previously been reported as independently associated with a poor prognosis in pediatric B-cell precursor (BCP) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We have now refined the prognostic strength of IKZF1 deletions by analyzing the effect of co-occurring deletions. Patients and Methods The analysis involved 991 patients with BCP ALL treated in the Associazione Italiana Ematologia ed Oncologia Pediatrica–Berlin-Frankfurt-Muenster (AIEOP-BFM) ALL 2000 trial with complete information for copy number alterations of IKZF1, PAX5, ETV6, RB1, BTG1, EBF1, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, Xp22.33/Yp11.31 (PAR1 region; CRLF2, CSF2RA, and IL3RA), and ERG; replication of findings involved 417 patients from the same trial. Results IKZF1 deletions that co-occurred with deletions in CDKN2A, CDKN2B, PAX5, or PAR1 in the absence of ERG deletion conferred the worst outcome and, consequently, were grouped as IKZF1plus. The IKZF1plus group comprised 6% of patients with BCP ALL, with a 5-year event-free survival of 53 ± 6% compared with 79 ± 5% in patients with IKZF1 deletion who did not fulfill the IKZF1plus definition and 87 ± 1% in patients who lacked an IKZF1 deletion ( P ≤ .001). Respective 5-year cumulative relapse incidence rates were 44 ± 6%, 11 ± 4%, and 10 ± 1% ( P ≤ .001). Results were confirmed in the replication cohort, and multivariable analyses demonstrated independence of IKZF1plus. The IKZF1plus prognostic effect differed dramatically in analyses stratified by minimal residual disease (MRD) levels after induction treatment: 5-year event-free survival for MRD standard-risk IKZF1plus patients was 94 ± 5% versus 40 ± 10% in MRD intermediate- and 30 ± 14% in high-risk IKZF1plus patients ( P ≤ .001). Corresponding 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse rates were 6 ± 6%, 60 ± 10%, and 60 ± 17% ( P ≤ .001). Conclusion IKZF1plus describes a new MRD-dependent very-poor prognostic profile in BCP ALL. Because current AIEOP-BFM treatment is largely ineffective for MRD-positive IKZF1plus patients, new experimental treatment approaches will be evaluated in our upcoming trial AIEOP-BFM ALL 2017.

Minimal Residual Disease Values Discriminate Between Low and High Relapse Risk in Children With B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and an Intrachromosomal Amplification of Chromosome 21: The Austrian and German Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (ALL-BFM) Trials

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (18) ◽  
pp. 3046-3050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andishe Attarbaschi ◽  
Georg Mann ◽  
Renate Panzer-Grümayer ◽  
Silja Röttgers ◽  
Manuel Steiner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Chromosome 21 ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Cell Precursor ◽  
Minimal Residual

Purpose We aimed to identify relapse predictors in children with a B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and an intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 (iAMP21), a novel genetic entity associated with poor outcome. Patients and Methods We screened 1,625 patients who were enrolled onto the Austrian and German ALL–Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (ALL-BFM) trials 86, 90, 95, and 2000 with ETV6/RUNX1-specific fluorescent in situ hybridization probes, and we identified 29 patient cases (2%) who had an iAMP21. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was quantified with clone-specific immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements. Results Twenty-five patients were good responders to prednisone, and all achieved remission after induction therapy. Eleven patients experienced relapse, which included eight who experienced relapse after cessation of front-line therapy. Six-year event-free and overall survival rates were 37% ± 14% and 66% ± 11%, respectively. Results of MRD analysis were available in 24 (83%) of 29 patients: nine (37.5%) belonged to the low-risk, 14 (58.5%) to the intermediate-risk, and one (4%) to the high-risk group. MRD results were available in 8 of 11 patients who experienced a relapse. Seven occurred among the 14 intermediate-risk patients, and one occurred in the high-risk patient. Conclusion The overall and early relapse rates in the BFM study were lower than that in a previous United Kingdom Medical Research Council/Childhood Leukemia Working Party study (38% v 61% and 27% v 47%, respectively), which might result from more intensive induction and early reintensification therapy in the ALL-BFM protocols. MRD values were the only reliable parameter to discriminate between a low and high risk of relapse (P = .02).

scholarly journals Health-Related Quality of Life in Adults with B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Minimal Residual Disease Treated with Blinatumomab

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1377-1377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf C Bargou ◽  
Gerhard Zugmaier ◽  
Massimiliano Bonifacio ◽  
Carlos Graux ◽  
Christoph Faul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Status ◽  
Global Health ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Social Functioning ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Global Health Status ◽  
Cell Precursor ◽  
Support Research

Abstract Background: Positive minimal residual disease (MRD) is an established prognostic marker for hematologic relapse, negative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) outcome, and mortality in adults with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; Gökbuget N, et al. Blood. 2012;120:1868-1876). In the open-label, single-arm phase 2 BLAST study (N=116; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01207388), treatment with blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) antibody construct that redirects cytotoxic T cells to residual CD19+ blast cells, led to complete MRD response in 88 of 113 (78%) patients after cycle 1 (Gökbuget N, et al. Blood. 2018;131:1522-1531). Median overall survival was 36.5 months. Among patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell ALL in complete MRD remission, relapse-free survival was 54% at 18months. In this analysis of the BLAST study, we assessed the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients during and after treatment with blinatumomab. Methods: Eligible patients (≥18 years) had B-cell precursor ALL in first or later hematologic complete remission and persistent or recurrent MRD ≥10-3 after ≥3 blocks of intensive chemotherapy. Blinatumomab 15 μg/m2/day was administered by continuous intravenous (cIV) infusion for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week infusion-free interval, for up to 4 cycles. Patients could receive HSCT any time after cycle 1. HRQoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 Questionnaire at baseline, on day 29 of each treatment cycle, at the safety follow-up visit (30 days after end of treatment), and at the efficacy follow-up visits (3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment start). The questionnaire included 1 global health status scale, 5 functioning scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single-symptom items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). For global health status and functioning scales, a higher score indicates better HRQoL; for symptom scales/items, a lower score indicates better HRQoL. A 10-point change is often viewed as the minimum clinically important difference (MID) in EORTC QLQ-C30 (Zikos E, et al. EORTC, 2016). In this analysis, the mean (SD) and the mean (SD) change from baseline to end of cycle 1 of the scores for each scale/item was summarized at each scheduled assessment during and after blinatumomab treatment. Results: In total, 89 patients had a nonmissing baseline value and a nonmissing value of any scale on day 29 of cycle 1, and thus were evaluable for HRQoL. The patient-reported global health status and functioning scale scores were stable over time during and after blinatumomab treatment (Figure 1). Symptom-scale and single-symptom scores were similarly stable during and after treatment (not shown). Mean (SD) changes from baseline to end of cycle 1 in global health status and in physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning were 2.5 (18.5), 0.3 (12.5), -4.0 (30.0), 4.2 (20.5), -1.7 (16.2), and 10.4 (31.8), respectively (Figure 2). These results show that, after 1 cycle of blinatumomab, the change in HRQoL was minimal for most scales, with potential clinically meaningful improvements in social functioning. Similar minimal changes were observed for all symptom scales/items (not shown). Conclusions: In this population of patients with B-cell precursor ALL and MRD successfully treated with blinatumomab 15 μg/m2/day cIV for up to 4 cycles, HRQoL was maintained during and after blinatumomab treatment, which is an important result considering the potential HRQoL impact of standard chemotherapy. Disclosures Zugmaier: Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Employment, Patents & Royalties: 20170327581, 9688760, 20170122947, 9486475, 20160208001, 9192665, 20150071928, 8840888, 20140227272, 20140228316, 20130323247, 20130287774, 20130287778, 20110262440, 20100112603, 7700299, 20070037228. Bonifacio:Incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Topp:Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Research Funding. Tran:Amgen Inc.: Employment. Zhang:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Goekbuget:Kite / Gilead: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Blinatumomab for minimal residual disease in adults with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 131 (14) ◽  
pp. 1522-1531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Gökbuget ◽  
Hervé Dombret ◽  
Massimiliano Bonifacio ◽  
Albrecht Reichle ◽  
Carlos Graux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Cell Precursor ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Approximately 30% to 50% of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in hematologic complete remission after multiagent therapy exhibit minimal residual disease (MRD) by reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction or flow cytometry. MRD is the strongest predictor of relapse in ALL. In this open-label, single-arm study, adults with B-cell precursor ALL in hematologic complete remission with MRD (≥10−3) received blinatumomab 15 µg/m2 per day by continuous IV infusion for up to 4 cycles. Patients could undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation any time after cycle 1. The primary end point was complete MRD response status after 1 cycle of blinatumomab. One hundred sixteen patients received blinatumomab. Eighty-eight (78%) of 113 evaluable patients achieved a complete MRD response. In the subgroup of 110 patients with Ph-negative ALL in hematologic remission, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of relapse-free survival (RFS) at 18 months was 54%. Median overall survival (OS) was 36.5 months. In landmark analyses, complete MRD responders had longer RFS (23.6 vs 5.7 months; P = .002) and OS (38.9 vs 12.5 months; P = .002) compared with MRD nonresponders. Adverse events were consistent with previous studies of blinatumomab. Twelve (10%) and 3 patients (3%) had grade 3 or 4 neurologic events, respectively. Four patients (3%) had cytokine release syndrome grade 1, n = 2; grade 3, n = 2), all during cycle 1. After treatment with blinatumomab in a population of patients with MRD-positive B-cell precursor ALL, a majority achieved a complete MRD response, which was associated with significantly longer RFS and OS compared with MRD nonresponders. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01207388.

scholarly journals Monitoring of the Clonal Architecture of B-Cell Precursor ALL during Induction Chemoimmunotherapy

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1555-1555
Author(s):  
Michaela Kotrova ◽  
Monika Szczepanowski ◽  
Henrik Knecht ◽  
Christoph Faul ◽  
Mustafa Kondakci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Heavy Chain ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Cell Precursor ◽  
Clonal Architecture ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Support Research

Abstract Background: High throughput sequencing of immunoglobuline heavy chain gene rearrangements (IGH) recently demonstrated that B-cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL) is a highly oligoclonal disease in children (Theunissen, Hematologica, 2017), however, little is known about the degree of oligoclonality in adults with BCP-ALL. Furthermore, no data exist on potential changes of the subclonal composition during therapy. Therefore, we aimed to monitor the clonal architecture of the leukemic blasts before and after Rituximab containing induction treatment in the context of the current German Multicentric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (GMALL) 08/2013 trial. Materials & Methods: We identified and studied complete and incomplete immunoglobulin (IG) heavy chain rearrangements in 100ng of bone marrow (BM) DNA at diagnosis (dx) and 500ng BM DNA after Rituximab-containing induction I in 19 patients with BCP-ALL. We employed IGH-VJ FR1 and IGH-DJ NGS assays developed within the EuroClonality-NGS Consortium (www.euroclonalityngs.org), performing next generation sequencing on Illumina MiSeq. We analysed data with the ARResT/Interrogate bioinformatics platform (Bystry, Bioinformatics, 2017), which is also able to isolate and use the DN-J stem of V/DJ junctions to link clonally related rearrangements. Clones with abundance ≥5 %, and all subclones carrying the same DN-J stem as the dominant clones were considered as leukemia-associated and studied further. Employing the sequence of the DN-J stem, we could also link related complete and incomplete rearrangements, even though those are amplified in two separate PCRs. Results: At dx, 18/19 patients carried at least 1 IGH rearrangement with abundance ≥ 5%, 10 patients carried 2 or more. In all 18 patients with dominant markers detected at dx, subclones with abundance <5% carrying the same DN-J stem as the dominant clone were present, indicating oligoclonality and clonal evolution. On average, 53.1 (range 0-295) (sub)clones per DN-J stem were detected at dx, and 32.7 (range 0-238) after treatment. Next, we compared the kinetics of all (sub)clones with abundance ≥1% in at least one of the time-points. Of the 18 patients, 6 only had subclones with abundance <1%, and we did not investigate the kinetics of such subclones. In another 11 patients (Fig. 1, Pt. 1-11), all sub(clones) had the same kinetics, with no clone gaining predominance over time. In 1 patient (Fig. 1, Pt. 12), 3 (sub)clones which were present at dx disappeared and a new subclone appeared after treatment. This patient had a pro-B immunophenotype, where oligoclonality and clonal instability are well known phenomena (Szczepanski, Leukemia, 2001). Conclusions: It has recently been shown that ALL is a highly oligoclonal disease in children (Theunissen, Hematologica, 2017), and our study extends this finding to adults with BCP-ALL. We furthermore demonstrate that the subclonal composition remains stable in the majority of patient during induction chemoimmunotherapy. The fact that the response to treatment is generally consistent among different (sub)clones has important implications for MRD quantification as it reassures the usage of the dominant clonal IG gene rearrangement for MRD monitoring in ALL. However, also significant changes of the clonal composition may occur in BCP-ALL as exemplified in one patient of our cohort. Further investigations are necessary to elucidate factors that influence subclonal heterogeneity in response to treatment. Disclosures Viardot: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kneba:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Goekbuget:Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Kite / Gilead: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy. Brüggemann:Incyte: Consultancy; PRMA: Consultancy; Regeneron: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document