Phase-1 Study of PF-114 Mesylate in CML Failing Prior Tyrosine Kinase-Inhibitor Therapy

Abstract Background: PF-114 mesylate is a 4th-generation oral tyrosine kinase-inhibitor (TKI) active against wild-type and mutated BCRABL1 isoforms including those with a BCRABL1T315I. We present data from a phase-1 study in subjects with chronic or accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) failing ≥2 TKIs or who have BCRABL1T315I (NCT02885766). Methods: 3+3 dose-escalation design to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) followed by expanded cohorts for doses ≤MTD. The primary objective was to determine the MTD and identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during cycle 1 (28 days). Secondary objectives included safety and anti-CML activity based on hematological, cytogenetic, and molecular criteria. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed and graded using NCI-CTCAE v4.03. Results: 51 subjects were enrolled as of June 26, 2018. Daily doses were 50 mg (n=3), 100 mg (n=3), 200 mg (n=9), 300 mg (n=11), 400 mg (n=12), 500 mg (n=3), 600 mg (n=6), 750 mg (n=4) given on a continuous QD schedule. Median age was 50 years (range, 29-82 years). Median interval from diagnosis to study-entry was 10 years (range, 0-23 years). Subjects had baseline ECOG performance scores <2. 13 subjects were reported to have BCRABL1T315I. Subjects were heavily pre-treated: 25 had received ≥3 prior TKIs; 5 subjects with BCRABL1T315I received 1 prior TKI. 600 mg was identified as the MTD with 1 of 6 subjects experiencing a DLT at this dose (Gr 3 psoriasis-like skin lesion). Similar grade-3 skin lesions were also identified at the dose of 750 mg in 2 subjects and at 400 mg in 1 subject. Therapy is ongoing in 23 subjects at doses 200, 300 and 400 mg with median duration of exposure of 5 (range, 1-21), 3 (range, 1-12) and 4 (range, 1-19) cycles. Other subjects discontinued because of progression (n=16), AEs (n=6) or other reasons (n=6). The most common of non-hematologic toxicity was skin toxicity, which was common at doses of ≥400 mg. Grade-3 skin toxicity occurred in 3 subjects on daily dose 750 mg, 4 subjects on dose 600 mg, 1 patient on dose 500 mg and 3 subjects on dose 400 mg. Skin lesions resolved rapidly upon drug discontinuation and topical therapy. No other drug related non-hematologic grade-3 toxicities except a single case of grade-3 hepatitis on dose 400 mg were observed. No deterioration of ankle-brachial index or vascular occlusive events were observed. A complete hematologic response was achieved in 8 of 19 evaluable subjects including 3 of 8 with BCRABL1T315I. Major cytogenetic response was achieved in 6 of 21 evaluable subjects including 3 of 7 with BCRABL1T315I. Major molecular response was achieved in 2 of 18 subjects completing ≥13 cycles. Most cytogenetic and molecular responses were achieved at doses 200 and 300 mg which were well-tolerated and will be considered for the phase-2 study. Conclusion: MTD of PF-114 is 600 mg with skin toxicity as the DLT. The best safety/efficacy ratio was seen at doses of 200 and 300 mg which are being studied in expanded cohorts and soon in a phase-2 study. Disclosures Turkina: Novartis: Other: provided consultations; Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: provided consultations; Phizer: Other: provided consultations; Fusion Pharma: Other: provided consultations. Shukhov:Novartis: Other: provided consultations and performed lectures ; Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: provided consultations and performed lectures . Chelysheva:Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: provided consultations and performed lectures; Fusion Pharma: Other: provided consultations ; Novartis: Other: provided consultations and performed lectures. Cortes:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding. Ottmann:Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Fusion Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mikhailov:Fusion Pharma: Employment. Novikov:Fusion Pharma: Employment. Shulgina:Fusion Pharma: Employment. Chilov:Fusion Pharma: Employment.

Download Full-text

Elotuzumab In Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone In Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Interim Results of a Phase 2 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.986.986 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 986-986 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Paul G. Richardson ◽

Philippe Moreau ◽

Andrzej J Jakubowiak ◽

Thierry Facon ◽

Sundar Jagannath ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Infusion Reactions

Abstract Abstract 986 Introduction: Elotuzumab is a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody directed against CS1, an antigen highly and uniformly expressed on multiple myeloma (MM) cells but with restricted expression on normal cells. Elotuzumab exhibits significant antimyeloma activity in vitro and against MM xenografts, and its antitumor activity is enhanced independently by both lenalidomide and dexamethasone. In a dose-escalation phase 1 study that evaluated the combination of elotuzumab (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg), lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, the maximum tolerated dose was not reached, and the combination showed encouraging clinical activity (82% response rate) in patients with advanced MM. The most frequent infusion-related adverse events (AEs) were headache (21%), nausea (21%), and dizziness (11%), with 7% (2/28) of patients experiencing 3 serious infusion-related AEs during cycle 1 (1 with a grade 4 hypersensitivity reaction and 1 with 2 grade 3 stridor events). Key objectives of this dose randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study in patients with relapsed MM were to select the optimum dose of elotuzumab and to evaluate an enhanced premedication regimen to minimize the occurrence of infusion reactions. Methods: Patients with confirmed relapsed and/or refractory MM who had received 1–3 prior therapies were enrolled; prior lenalidomide therapy was excluded. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive elotuzumab either 10 or 20 mg/kg (IV infusion on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28-day cycle in the first 2 cycles and then days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles), along with lenalidomide 25 mg PO daily on days 1 to 21 and dexamethasone 40 mg PO weekly. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, if earlier. To control potential infusion reactions, patients received methylprednisolone (50 mg IV), diphenhydramine (25–50 mg PO or IV) or equivalent, ranitidine (50 mg IV) or equivalent, and acetaminophen (650–1000 mg PO) 30 to 60 minutes prior to each elotuzumab infusion. Objective responses (OR) were assessed according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Results: As of July 8, 2010, a total of 59 patients were randomized (intent to treat population); 47 patients received at least 1 dose of study medication (safety population); and 26 patients completed or progressed prior to completing 2 cycles of treatment (efficacy population). Median age was 64 years; 36 (61%) had received ≥2 prior therapies; 28 (48%) and 31 (53%) had received bortezomib or thalidomide, respectively, and 40 (68%) had undergone transplantation. Among efficacy evaluable patients, 22/26 (85%) had a confirmed or an unconfirmed response (≥ PR) including 31% VGPR/CR. The remaining 4/26 (15%) had stable disease (Table). Treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 36/47 patients (77%); the most common events were fatigue (26%) and nausea (21%). Serious treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 22% of patients; 2 events, nausea and febrile neutropenia with thrombocytopenia, were considered to be related to elotuzumab and lenalidomide. The most common infusion-related AEs within 24 hours of elotuzumab infusion were dizziness (15%), nausea (15%), and headache (9%). These decreased in frequency after the first treatment cycle. There were no severe AEs associated with infusion reactions. Conclusion: The combination of elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone resulted in a high response rate in patients with advanced MM and was generally well tolerated. These results are consistent with the results previously reported from the phase 1 study. The revised premedication regimen appeared to be more effective in controlling infusion reactions, which were generally mild to moderate with no severe infusion reactions reported to date. Updated response and safety data on all patients by dose level will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Richardson: Millennium, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide. Moreau:Celgene, Facet, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Jakubowiak:Millennium, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson Ortho-Centocor: Honoraria; Millennium, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium, Celgene, Centocor-Ortho Biotech: Speakers Bureau. Facon:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Jagannath:Millennium, Takeda Pharm, Janssen: Honoraria. Vij:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Reece:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Rossi:Sanofi-Aventis, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Tsao:Facet Biotech: Employment. Fry:Facet Biotech: Employment. Berman:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Singhal:Facet Biotech: Employment. Lonial:Millennium, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Onyx: Advisory Board, Consultancy; Millennium, Celgene, Novartis, Onyx, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Multicenter Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma (ATL) or Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2737.2737 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2737-2737 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Naokuni Uike ◽

Michinora Ogura ◽

Yoshitaka Imaizumi ◽

Norio Asou ◽

Atae Utsunomiya ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2737 Introduction: ATL is prevalent in Japan and has the worst prognosis among T-cell malignancies. PTCL also has a poor prognosis with currently available chemotherapeutic regimens, and both would benefit from better treatment modality. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with direct tumoricidal and antiproliferative activity, and is approved for multiple myeloma (MM) in combination with dexamethasone after at least 1 prior therapy and for transfusion-dependent anemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes associated with 5q deletion. We conducted a phase 1 study of lenalidomide in patients with relapsed ATL or PTCL to establish the recommended dose and schedule for a subsequent phase 2 study. Patients and Methods: This multicenter, phase 1, dose-escalation study assessed the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and efficacy in patients with relapsed advanced ATL or PTCL. Dose-escalation was conducted according to the standard 3+3 design. Up to one PTCL patient was allowed to be included in each cohort of 3 patients. Patients in Cohort 1 received oral lenalidomide 25 mg daily on Days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle. Patients in Cohorts 2 and 3 received 25 and 35 mg/day, respectively, on each day of the 28-day cycle. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as febrile neutropenia lasting 5 or more days; thrombocytopenia (platelets <10,000/uL or bleeding requiring platelet transfusion); ALT/AST elevation of Grade 4 or that of Grade 3 lasting 7 or more days; and/or clinically unacceptable Grade 3 or higher other non-hematological adverse events (AEs). Treatment was continued until the development of unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease (PD). Response was assessed by internationally accepted standard criteria for ATL and PTCL. Results: From July 2010–June 2012, 13 Japanese patients (9 ATL and 4 PTCL; age 32–74 years [median, 64]; 1–11 prior therapies [median, 1]) were enrolled: 3 in Cohort 1, 6 in Cohort 2, and 4 in Cohort 3. The 3 patients in Cohort 1 received lenalidomide for 21, 103, and 637 days, respectively, until PD with no instances of DLT. In Cohort 2, 1 patient experienced DLT (thrombocytopenia, platelets <10,000/uL) and 4 patients received lenalidomide for 37, 56, 138, and 387 days, respectively, until PD in 3 patients and unrelated death in one. The sixth patient is still receiving lenalidomide for 28+ days without a DLT. In Cohort 3, 2 patients had DLTs (thrombocytopenia, platelets <10,000/uL in one patient and Grade 3 prolongation of QTc interval in one patient on concomitant fluconazole with preexisting cardiac disease and grade 1 QTc prolongation at baseline), 1 patient received lenalidomide for 71 days before withdrawal of consent, and 1 patient is still receiving lenalidomide for 323+ days without a DLT. Based on these results, 25 mg daily per 28-day cycle was regarded as the MTD. Other Grade 3/4 non-DLT AEs occurring in 2 or more patients included neutropenia (n=8), lymphocytopenia (n=7), thrombocytopenia (n=3), skin rash (n=3), hyperbilirubinemia (n=2), and increased ALT/AST (n=2). Among the 9 ATL patients, 3 achieved partial responses (PR) with hematological complete response in 2 patients, including the disappearance of skin lesions in 1 patient. These responses occurred between 54 and 57 days, and lasted for 92, 279+ and 505 days. Among the 4 PTCL patients, 1 achieved a PR at day 106 with >75% reduction in lymph nodes, which lasted for 282 days. PK profiles of patients in the study were generally consistent with that observed in Japanese MM patients. Plasma exposure of lenalidomide increased with increasing dose with a mean Cmax on Day 1 for 25 mg and 35 mg of 493 ng/mL and 628 ng/mL, respectively, and a mean AUC24 of 2774 ng/mL and 3062 ng/mL, respectively. There was no evidence of accumulation following multiple dosing for 8 days. Conclusions: This phase 1 study identified lenalidomide 25 mg daily per 28-day cycle as the dose and schedule for a subsequent phase 2 study in patients with ATL or PTCL. Based on the preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in ATL and PTCL patients, a phase 2 study in patients with relapsed ATL in Japan is planned. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Lenalidomide (CC-5013) is an investigational agent in Japan; this abstract assesses its use in adult ATL patients. Tobinai:Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Zenyaku: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Symbio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biomedics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Solasia Pharma: Clinical trials, Clinical trials Other, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Chugai/Roche: Research Funding; Takeda: Clinical trials, Clinical trials Other, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

An Open-Label, Phase 2, Multicenter Study Of The Safety Of Long-Term Treatment With Siltuximab (an Anti-Interleukin-6 Monoclonal Antibody) In Patients With Multicentric Castleman’s Disease

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1806.1806 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1806-1806 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Frits Van Rhee ◽

Corey Casper ◽

Peter M Voorhees ◽

Luis E Fayad ◽

Helgi van de Velde ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Control ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Extension Study ◽

Development Research ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Entire Treatment

Abstract Multicentric Castleman’s disease (MCD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disease driven by interleukin (IL)-6 overproduction. There is no established standard of care for MCD, and patients are usually managed by a variety of strategies with only modest success. Treatment with siltuximab, an anti-IL-6 mAb, demonstrated clinical and radiologic responses in MCD patients in a phase 1 study (Kurzrock et al. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:3659-70). A phase 2 extension study to assess the safety of long-term treatment with siltuximab in MCD patients is currently ongoing. We report the interim analysis results based on 19 patients who had sustained disease control on siltuximab in the phase 1 study and continued to receive siltuximab 11 mg/kg q3w IV in the phase 2 extension study. Safety monitoring focused on infections, hyperlipidemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, GI perforations, and liver function based on the potential risks from the mechanism of action of IL-6 blockade. Investigator assessed disease control and survival status were also collected. When these 19 patients started the phase 1 study, median age was 44 (range 18, 76) yrs, 63% were male, median disease duration was 4.8 mos (37% newly diagnosed), 53% had hyaline vascular and 47% had plasmacytic histological type, all were HIV- and HHV-8-negative, 32% were therapy-naïve, and 68% had prior therapy (including 21% with prior cancer-related surgery and 63% with prior systemic therapy for MCD). At the data cutoff for this interim analysis of the extension study (January 2013), patients had received in total a median of 81 doses (maximum 129) of siltuximab during a median treatment duration of 5.1 (range 3.4, 7.2) yrs, with 74% of patients treated >4 yrs. All 19 patients are alive and continuing siltuximab treatment. Over the entire treatment duration (ie, both studies), upper respiratory tract infection (89%); nausea (63%); vomiting (58%); diarrhea (53%); hypercholesterolemia (47%); hypertriglyceridemia, pain in extremities, headache, rash, and hepatic function abnormal (each 42%) were most commonly reported. The incidence of AEs reported in the different system-organ classes was similar or lower in the treatment periods of 2 to 4 yrs and more than 4 yrs compared with the treatment period of 0 to 2 yrs. 63% of patients reported at least one grade ≥3 AE (mostly grade 3, none grade 5) during the entire treatment period, most commonly in the following system-organ classes: gastrointestinal (32%); infections (26%); and blood/lymphatic system disorders or general disorders/administration-site conditions (each 21%). Grade ≥3 hypertension was reported in 3 patients; grade ≥3 nausea, cellulitis, and fatigue in 2 patients each; other grade ≥3 AEs were reported in single patients. Two patients had at least one serious infection during phase 1, and none were reported during phase 2 extension study (overall incidence 0.0226 per pt-yr). Eight patients had low-grade hypertriglyceridemia in phase 1, with no additional cases reported during extension study (overall incidence 0.1250 per pt-yr). No patient had grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, and only 1 patient had grade ≥3 neutropenia during the entire treatment period (overall incidence 0.0103 per pt-yr). Only 1 case of grade ≥3 abnormal hepatic function was reported (in phase 1). No GI perforations occurred. No patient developed infusion-related reactions during the extension study. Only 3 patients had SAEs during the extension study, including unrelated syncope and dyspnea. One patient developed grade 3 polycythemia (Hb 18.8 g/dL), which was controlled without complications. Based on independent radiologic review of images from the phase 1 study, 1 patient had CR, 11 had PR, and 7 had SD at initiation of extension study. All 19 patients have sustained disease control (SD or better) by investigator assessment, including 8 patients who had their dosing interval increased to q6w after established prolonged PR/CR (median q6w treatment duration 11 mos). After a median follow-up of 5.1 yrs, the OS rate in these 19 patients is 100%. In conclusion, the 19 patients with MCD in this extension study have received siltuximab for a prolonged period of time (median 5.1 yrs, up to 7.2 yrs). All patients are alive and maintain disease control. Prolonged siltuximab treatment is well tolerated, with no evidence of new or cumulative toxicity or treatment discontinuations and with a low rate of serious adverse events including serious infections. Disclosures: Van Rhee: Janssen Research & Development: Research Funding. Casper:Janssen Research & Development: Research Funding. Voorhees:Janssen Research & Development: Research Funding; Abbott: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; MedImmune: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. van de Velde:Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership; Janssen Research & Development: Employment. Vermeulen:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Qin:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Qi:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Tromp:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Kurzrock:Janssen Research & Development: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Trial of G-CSF, Cladribine, Cytarabine, and Dose-Escalated Mitoxantrone (G-CLAM) in Adults with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1339.1339 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1339-1339

Author(s):

Asma Anwar ◽

Anna B. Halpern ◽

Megan Othus ◽

Bart L. Scott ◽

Paul C. Hendrie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Early Death ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Persistent Disease ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Refractory Aml

Abstract Background: Although some adults with AML or high-risk MDS will experience long-term disease-free survival after initiation of curative-intent therapy, most patient will require therapy re-induction therapy either for primary induction failure of disease recurrence after an initial complete remission (CR) was achieved. The outcomes with standard regimens for relapsed/refractory AML are generally poor, with CR rates often not exceeding 15-20%. Data from a large single arm phase 2 study in poor-risk relapsed/refractory AML suggested tolerability and encouraging activity of a combination of G-CSF, cladribine, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone (G-CLAM). Given recent data suggesting benefit of escalated doses of anthracyclines in AML, the goal of our phase 1 study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of mitoxantrone within G-CLAM in adults with relapsed/refractory AML or high-risk MDS and estimate the efficacy of this regimen. Patients and Methods: Adults ≥18 years of age with relapsed or refractory AML (APL excluded) or high-risk MDS (>10% blasts) were eligible if they had a treatment-related mortality (TRM) score of ≤6.9 (corresponding to a risk of early death with standard induction chemotherapy of ≤3%) and adequate organ function (LVEF ≥45%, creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dL, bilirubin ≤2.5-times upper limit of normal). Excluded were patients with concomitant illness with expected survival <1 year and those with active, uncontrolled infection. Cohorts of 6-12 patients were assigned to 1 of 4 total dose levels of mitoxantrone (12, 14, 16, or 18 mg/m2/day on days 1-3, as compared to 10 mg/m2/day used in standard-dose G-CLAM). Other drug doses were G-CSF 300 or 480 μg/day (for weight <76 kg vs. ≥76 kg; days 0-5), cladribine 5 mg/m2/day (days 1-5), and cytarabine 2 g/m2/day (days 1-5). A second identical course of G-CLAM was given in the case of persistent disease. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as: 1) any grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting >48 hours that resulted in >7 day delay of the subsequent treatment cycle, with the exception of febrile neutropenia or infection; 2) any grade ≥4 non-hematologic toxicity, with the exception of febrile neutropenia or infection or constitutional symptoms, if recovery to grade ≤2 within 14 days. Results: 26 patients (14M, 12F), median age 57 (range: 37-77) years, median TRM score 1.73 (range: 0.29-3.92) with relapsed/refractory AML (n=23), or high-risk MDS (n=3) and cytogenetically favorable (n=2), intermediate (n=13), and adverse (n=11) disease characteristics were enrolled. One DLT occurred at dose level 1 (nausea) and 2 at dose level 4 (encephalitis and cardiogenic shock), establishing G-CLAM with mitoxantrone at 16 mg/m2/day as the MTD in our study. 2 patients (8% [95% exact confidence interval: 1-25%]) died within 28 days of treatment initiation from sepsis and cardiogenic shock, respectively. Overall, 13/26 patients (50% [30-70%]) achieved a CR (n=8) (31% [14-52%]), CRp (n=1) (4% [0-20%]), or CRi (n=4) (15% [4-35%]) with 1-2 cycles of re-induction therapy; one patient each achieved a leukemia-free state and partial remission (in a patient presenting with myeloid sarcomas); nine patients (35% [17-56%]) had persistent disease. We were unable to assess response in 2 patients due to early death (n=1) and refusal for marrow re-assessment (n=1). 7/13 responders (54%) had no evidence of residual disease by flow cytometry at best response. Among responders, median times to an absolute neutrophil count ≥500/µL and a platelet count of 50,000/µL were 33 (range: 17-51) and 31 (range: 18-54) days, respectively. Besides infections and neutropenic fever, nausea, hypoxia (fluid overload/infection-related), and maculopapular rash were the most common grade ≥3 adverse events. Conclusion G-CLAM with mitoxantrone up to 16 mg/m2/day is feasible, well tolerated, and effective in relapsed/ refractory AML/high-risk MDS. A phase 2 study based on these findings has been initiated. Disclosures Scott: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Becker:Igenica: Research Funding. Walter:Pfizer, Inc.: Consultancy; Amgen, Inc.: Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Covagen AG: Consultancy; AstraZeneca, Inc.: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Study of the IDH1m Inhibitor FT-2102 As a Single Agent in Patients with IDH1m Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114263 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1453-1453 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Justin Watts ◽

Maria R. Baer ◽

Jay Yang ◽

Shira Dinner ◽

Sangmin Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Dose Escalation ◽

Human Tissue ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations (IDH1m) occur in 7-14% of AML patients and 3% of MDS patients and produce 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), an oncometabolite that impairs differentiation. FT-2102 is an oral, highly potent, selective small molecule inhibitor of mutated IDH1, with the therapeutic potential to restore normal cellular differentiation. Herein, we present preclinical and clinical data from an ongoing Phase 1/2 study of single-agent (SA) FT-2102 in patients with IDH1m AML and MDS (CT.gov: NCT02719574). Methods: Extensive pre-clinical evaluations were performed on FT-2102, including CYP interactions in-vivo in rat and in-vitro in human tissue and in-vivo QTc toxicology in monkeys. The clinical Phase 1 study was initiated to evaluate the safety, PK/PD, and antileukemic activity of FT-2102 in patients with IDH1m AML or MDS and included both dose escalation and expansion phases. FT-2102 was administered daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Eligibility criteria included: IDH1m AML/MDS [relapsed/refractory (R/R) or treatment naïve (TN) for whom standard therapy was contraindicated], adequate liver and renal function, no prior IDH1 inhibitors, and no restrictions for concomitant non-anticancer medications. Investigator-assessed responses were per modified IWG 2003/2006 criteria. Efficacy was assessed at Cycle 2 Day 1 and as clinically indicated thereafter. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed throughout the study per NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Results: Evaluation of FT-2102 in in-vivo rat and in-vitro human tissue indicated hepatic metabolism by CYP enzymes (CPY3A4, 2C9, 1A1) as the major route of excretion. Animal toxicology studies predicted the threshold for QTc risk occurred at exposures >5.5 fold higher than the murine exposure at which 90% 2-HG reduction was observed. In the clinical study, at the time of the data cutoff, 31 patients (pts) had been treated with SA FT-2102, with a median of 3 mo. on treatment (range: 0.2 to 20 mo.). Of the 31pts treated, 25 had AML (22 R/R; 3 TN) and 6 had MDS (4 R/R; 2 TN). The median number of prior anti-leukemia therapies was 2 (range: 0-9) for AML pts and 1 (range: 0-4) for MDS pts. FT-2102 doses were: 150 mg QD (n=8), 300 mg QD (n=4), 150 mg BID (n=16), and 100 mg QD with food (n=3). Eighteen pts discontinued treatment, most commonly due to death (n=5), progressive disease (n=5), HSCT (n=3), or lack of response (n=3). Severe (≥Grade 3) AEs occurring in >5% of pts included thrombocytopenia (26%), febrile neutropenia (23%), anemia (19%), pneumonia (13%), neutropenia (7%), hypokalemia (7%), pyrexia (7%) and leukocytosis (6%). Three pts had differentiation syndrome (IDH-DS), which resolved with temporary interruption of FT-2102, treatment with dexamethasone, hydroxyurea, and supportive care in all three. One pt had transient QTcF prolongation (Grade 3) which resolved with temporary interruption of FT-2102 and cessation of suspected concomitant medications. Eight pts died on treatment or within 28 days of the last dose, with no deaths considered related to FT-2102. No DLTs were observed during dose escalation. Selection of FT-2102 150 mg BID as the RP2D was supported by PK and PD data. Durable steady-state (Css) achieved by Week 2 was well below the threshold for QTc risk predicted by preclinical studies. The predicted IC90 was confirmed with prompt and durable 2-HG reduction to normal levels by C2D1 at the RP2D. Table 1 shows the Investigator-assessed ORR per IWG. Responses have been observed from 1 to 6 months on treatment, with stable disease observed beyond 6 months; 42% of the patients remain on treatment. Conclusions: FT-2102 preclinical evaluations suggest a low risk of clinically significant CYP-mediated drug-drug interaction and QTc prolongation. SA FT-2102 is well tolerated in AML and MDS, with 150 mg BID selected as the RP2D based on safety, PK and PD (2-HG) response. Significant clinical activity has been observed in heavily pre-treated and in TN patients, both in AML and MDS. FT-2102 continues being investigated at a dose of 150 mg BID in a Phase 2 study. Three SA Phase 2 cohorts are currently open for enrollment in R/R AML, AML/MDS with CR/CRi (i.e., with MRD), and in pts with R/R MDS/AML with prior exposure to an IDH1m inhibitor. Data updates will be available at the time of presentation. Disclosures Lee: LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Clinipace: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Schiller:Celator/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Ferrell:Incyte: Research Funding. Kelly:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Li:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Sweeney:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Watson:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Mohamed:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Cortes:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

The Novel KSP Inhibitor ARRY-520 Demonstrates Single-Agent Activity in Refractory Myeloma: Results From a Phase 2 Trial in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2935.2935 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2935-2935

Author(s):

Sagar Lonial ◽

Adam Cohen ◽

Jeffrey Zonder ◽

William I Benzinger ◽

Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Safety Profile ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Acceptable Safety Profile ◽

Heavily Pretreated ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Novel Agent

Abstract Abstract 2935 Background: ARRY-520 is a potent, selective inhibitor of kinesin spindle protein (KSP, eg5) which is required for cell cycle progression through mitosis. Treatment with ARRY-520 arrests cells in mitosis with subsequent onset of apoptosis due to degradation of survival signals during mitotic arrest. While immunomodulators [IMiDs] and proteasome inhibitors have improved outcomes in MM, patients with MM that is refractory to both bortezomib (BTZ) and thalidomide (THAL) or lenalidomide (LEN) have a poor prognosis with median survival of 9 months. Since ARRY-520 is a novel agent with a unique mechanism of action (MOA) relative to current standard-of-care (SOC) agents, it might be expected to show activity in patients refractory to other drugs. Preclinically, ARRY-520 showed activity in BTZ-refractory models, suggesting prior treatments may not predict patient response to ARRY-520. Methods: This Phase 2 study was designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and biological effects of 1.5 mg/m2/day ARRY-520 administered intravenously on Days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. Eligible patients had relapsed or refractory MM with ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy (including both BTZ and an IMiD), unless refusing or ineligible for this therapy. Results: Thirty-two patients have been treated, with a median age of 65 years (range 51–82) and a median of 5 prior regimens (n = 31; range 2–20). Twenty-eight patients received prior BTZ, 28 patients prior LEN, 17 patients prior THAL and 25 patients had an autologous stem cell transplant. One patient has been lost to follow-up. ARRY-520 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, confirming the safety profile observed in the Phase 1 study. The most commonly reported (≥ 10% of patients) treatment-related adverse events (AEs) included hematologic events such as anemia (11 patients [34%], 4 Grade 3/4 [12%]), neutropenia (11 patients [34%], 9 Grade 3/4 [28%]) and thrombocytopenia (20 patients [63%], 11 Grade 3/4 [34%]), as well as fatigue (4 patients [16%], 2 Grade 1/2 and 2 Grade 3) and mucositis (4 patients [13%], all Grade 1/2). No treatment-related events of alopecia or neuropathy were reported. One patient discontinued study due to a treatment-related AE of blisters. ARRY-520 has shown preliminary activity as a single agent in this heavily pretreated population. To date, of 32 evaluable patients, 3 confirmed partial responses (PR) and 2 confirmed minimal responses (MR) have been observed, per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) and European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EMBT) criteria. PRs had a median of 5 prior therapies (range 2–8). As observed in the Phase 1 study, the time to response with ARRY-520 was prolonged. Notably, clinical responses have been observed in this study in patients refractory to both LEN and BTZ. To date, in this ongoing study 33% (5/15) of patients with disease refractory to both LEN and BTZ achieved clinical benefit (PR + MR + SD > 4 months). While this trial has been fully recruited, as of July 2011, 8 patients remain on study. Conclusions: ARRY-520 is a novel agent with a differentiated MOA relative to other myeloma drugs. ARRY-520 shows promising evidence of single-agent clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with MM. Notably, ARRY-520 has demonstrated activity in patients refractory to both LEN and BTZ, a population with limited treatment options. An expansion cohort is planned in order to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ARRY-520 in combination with dexamethasone in patients who are refractory to their last myeloma treatment and refractory to prior LEN, BTZ and dexamethasone. Disclosures: Lonial: Onyx: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy. Off Label Use: ARRY-520. Cohen:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria. Zonder:Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Medtronics: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy. Benzinger:Array BioPharma: Research Funding. Kaufman:Keryx: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Orlowski:Array BioPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alexanian:Array BioPharma: Research Funding. Thomas:Array BioPharma: Research Funding; Centecor: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding. Weber:Array BioPharma: Research Funding. Walker:Array BioPharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hilder:Array BioPharma: Employment. Ptaszynski:Array BioPharma: Consultancy. Shah:Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 study with BIBW 2992, an irreversible dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor 1 (EGFR) and 2 (HER2) in a 2 week on 2 week off schedule

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.3025 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. 3025-3025 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

C. H. Mom ◽

F. A. Eskens ◽

J. A. Gietema ◽

K. Nooter ◽

M. J. De Jonge ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Peak Plasma ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Plasma Concentrations ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Ki 67 ◽

Bibw 2992 ◽

Skin Biopsies ◽

Grade 3

3025 Background: BIBW 2992 is a highly selective, potent, irreversible tyrosine inhibitor of EGFR and HER2. A phase 1 study of orally administered BIBW 2992 was performed to determine its safety, PK and PD. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced solid malignancies received BIBW 2992 once daily (OD) for 2 weeks, in 4 week cycles. Adverse events were evaluated according to CTCv3.0 and tumor response according to RECIST. In cycle 1 and 2, BIBW 2992 plasma PK analysis was performed. Before and after cycle 1, biomarkers involved in EGFR activation were assessed in skin biopsies. Results: 38 pts received 10 mg (n=3), 20 mg (n=3), 30 mg (n=3), 45 mg (n=3), 70 mg (n=18), 100 mg (n=2) and 85 mg (n=6) OD. At 100 mg dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) consisted of grade 3 skin rash (n=1) and grade 3 diarrhea despite loperamide (n=1). At the dose level of 85 mg, DLTs were seen in 2 pts (diarrhea in both). An additional 12 pts were subsequently enrolled at 70 mg. A total of 3 DLTs was seen in the 18 pts treated at 70 mg (all 3 diarrhea, in one case with additional grade 3 nausea and ALT increase). In other pts, diarrhea was controllable with loperamide, whereas skin events could be ameliorated with minocycline. The dose of 70 mg BIBW 2992 OD was therefore set as the recommended phase 2 dose. Exposure (AUC0-∞ and AUCτ,ss range 82–2080 ng·h/mL) and peak plasma concentrations (Cmax and Cmax,ss range 7–150 ng/mL) increased with increasing doses. High interpatient variability in all PK parameters was found, but was within the range expected for an orally administered drug. The volume of distribution (Vz/F) ranged from 800–2900 L, indicating high tissue distribution. Median tmax values ranged between 1–4 h. The gMean terminal t1/2 ranged between 13–32 h. Accumulation ratio based on AUC was between 2–2.9. Steady state was reached around day 8. After cycle 1, a >20% reduction in Ki-67 (range 20–83%), reflecting inhibition of keratinocyte proliferation, was seen in paired skin biopsies of 31 pts. Ki-67 positive cells (mean ± SD) decreased from 14 ± 4.5% pre-treatment to 7.9 ± 4.5% on day 13 (p<0.0001). SD lasting ≥4 cycles occurred in 8 pts. Conclusions: 70 mg BIBW 2992 OD can be safely administered in a 2 week on, 2 week off schedule. Further evaluation in phase 2 trials in warranted. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Study of Axatilimab (SNDX-6352), a CSF-1R Humanized Antibody, for Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease after 2 or More Lines of Systemic Treatment

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141553 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1-2

Author(s):

Mukta Arora ◽

Madan Jagasia ◽

Antonio Di Stasi ◽

Michael L Meyers ◽

Christine Quaranto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Graft Versus Host Disease ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Host Disease ◽

Graft Versus Host ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Treatment Emergent Adverse Event ◽

Fund Research

Background: Chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) is a major cause of morbidity and late non-relapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and is commonly associated with prolonged immune suppression. Patients (pts) with inadequate response to steroids have few effective therapeutic options and represent an unmet medical need. Available therapies are associated with significant toxicity, immunosuppression, and increased risk of infections. Preclinical studies demonstrate that CSF-1/CSF-1R is a key regulatory pathway involved in the expansion and infiltration of donor-derived macrophages that mediate cGVHD. Axatilimab (SNDX-6352, axa) is a humanized, full-length IgG4 antibody with high affinity to CSF-1R. Axa affects the migration, proliferation, differentiation, and survival of monocytes and macrophages by binding to CSF-1R and blocking its activation by its two known ligands, CSF-1 and IL-34. It offers a novel therapeutic option for treatment of these pts Methods: SNDX-6352-0503 is a Phase 1/2 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study evaluating safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD), and efficacy of axa in pts >6 years of age with active symptomatic cGVHD despite ≥2 prior lines of therapy. The Phase 1 endpoints were safety, tolerability, PK and PD with the primary objective of defining optimal biologic dose; the primary endpoint of the Phase 2 study is overall response rate (CR+PR) by 6 months. Pts were dosed in 28-day cycles. The data cutoff was 22 July 2020. Results: Twelve pts have been enrolled in the Phase 1 study. Median age at enrollment was 58y (range, 29-73y), 8 pts were male. Pts had failed a median of 5 prior lines of treatment (range 4-9). Doses included 0.15 mg/kg (n=1), 0.5mg/kg (n=1), 1mg/kg (n=3), 3 mg/kg (n=6) every 2 weeks (q2w), and 3mg/kg q4w (n=1). Of these, 5 pts (42%) are still receiving axa. The median number of cycles for all pts is 5 (range 1-12). Of the 3 pts whose starting dose was 3 mg/kg q2w and remain on study, 2 dose reduced; one to 2 mg/kg q4w and one to 1 mg/kg q2w. Seven pts (58%) discontinued due to: adverse events (3 mg/kg q2w, n=2); death due to traumatic fall (1 mg/kg q2w, n=1); investigator decision (0.5 mg/kg q2w, n=1); progressive cGVHD (1 and 0.15 mg/kg q2w, n=1 each); and non-compliance (3 mg/kg q2w, n=1). Two of 6 pts (17%) at a dose of 3 mg/kg q2w reported a treatment emergent adverse event that was considered a dose limiting toxicity (DLT): 1 with CTCAE Grade 4 creatine kinase increase with symptoms of myositis after dose 1, and the 2nd with an elevation in amylase/lipase that delayed the 3rd dose for >2 weeks. The latter pt restarted therapy at 1 mg/kg q2w and remains on treatment after 5 cycles. Four pts (1 at 0.15 mg/kg and 3 at 3 mg/kg q2w, 33%) had a related treatment emergent adverse event that was ≥Grade 3: increase in aspartate aminotransferase (n=2); increase in creatine phosphokinase (n=2); and increase in gamma-glutamyl transferase (n=2). Such biochemical elevations may be a consequence of CSF-1R blockade on Kupffer cells leading to an inhibition in the clearance of these enzymes, consistent with the mechanism of action of axa and when asymptomatic have not been associated with clinical manifestations of hepatitis, pancreatitis, or rhabdomyolysis. Periorbital edema was observed in 2 pts (≤Grade 2); no additional CSF-1Ri class-effect associated TEAEs were observed Clinical responses as defined by the 2014 NIH cGVHD Consensus Criteria have been observed in 7 pts (58%) across all dose levels; median time to response was 12 weeks. Organ-specific responses have been observed in esophagus (n=1/1), eyes (n=3/10), joints/fascia (n=5/9), mouth (n=1/7), and skin (n=3/8). Prior therapies received by the responders included ibrutinib (6 pts), ruxolitinib (5 pts), and KD025 (3 pts); 3 of the responding pts had received all of these. Six pts (50%) reported at least a 7-point improvement in the Lee Symptom Score. Preliminary PK profiles and pharmacodynamic endpoints, including circulating CD14+CD16+ nonclassical and CD14++CD16+ intermediate monocyte kinetics, are consistent with those observed in healthy volunteers and pts with solid tumors see figure below. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that axatilimab is clinically active with acceptable safety profile and responses observed in heavily pretreated pts with active cGVHD. Enrollment continues in the Phase 1 study at 3 mg/kg q4w and Phase 2 study at a dose of 1 mg/kg q2w. Figure Disclosures Arora: Syndax: Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Kadmon: Research Funding. Jagasia:Janssen: Research Funding; Mallinckrodt: Research Funding; Ocugen: Other. Meyers:Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment. Quaranto:Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment. Schmitt:Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment. Sankoh:Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment. Abu Zaid:Syndax: Research Funding. Hill:Roche: Research Funding; Generon: Consultancy; CSL: Research Funding; Implicit Bioscience: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Compass Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Weisdorf:Incyte: Research Funding; FATE Therapeutics: Consultancy. Blazar:BlueRock Therapeuetic: Consultancy; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy; BlueRock Therapeutics: Research Funding; Childrens' Cancer Research Fund: Research Funding; KidsFirst Fund: Research Funding; Tmunity: Other: Co-founder; Fate Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding. Ordentlich:Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment. Lee:Takeda: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Kadmon: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: The drug (Axatilimab) is a humanized antibody against CSF-1R. The study is a phase I trial testing this drug in patients with chronic graft versus host disease

Download Full-text

Phase 3 Study of Pomalidomide with Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone Versus Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Asian Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma (RRMM) - Interim Analysis of a Trial By the Asian Myeloma Network (AMN)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139019 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1-1

Author(s):

Wee-Joo Chng ◽

Xinhua Li ◽

Cindy Lin ◽

Jin Seok Kim ◽

Hiroshi Handa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Interim Analysis ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Prior Exposure ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Asian Patients ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Experienced Grade

Background Pomalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug that has been approved for the treatment of relapse refractory myeloma. A previous small randomized phase 2 study in the United States showed that combination of Pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone induce a greater response rate than pomalidomide and dexamethasone1. In our prior study, AMN0012, we should that in patients with sub-optimal response to pomalidomide and dexamethasone, the addition of cyclophosphamide can increase response resulting in improvement of progression free survival. In the current study, we seek to randomize Asian patients with RRMM between PCD and PD to confirm the benefit of PCD. Method We conducted a prospective randomized trial of pomalidomide (4mg daily for 21 days followed by 7 days rest) plus dexamethasone 40mg once weekly for 4 weeks with or without cyclophosphamide (400mg once a week) in patients with relapse and refractory myeloma that has to be refractory to lenalidomide and has prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors. Each cycle is 4 weeks. Patients from Singapore, Japan and Korea (NCT03143049) were included in this Asian Myeloma Network trial. The trial was started in Sep 2017 and is still ongoing. To date, 53 patients have been recruited so far. This interim report presents data available up till the data cut-off date of 24 June 2020. Results Forty-six patients have available base line information and safety data and is included in this interim analysis. 50% of patients are male and median age of the cohort is 68 years old. 39% and 28% of patients are International Stage System (ISS) stage 2 and 3 respectively. 20% of patients have abnormal creatinine clearance. Median prior line of treatment is 3. All patients are refractory to lenalidomide and 96% have prior exposure to bortezomib. In addition, 12 patients (26%) and 5 (11%) have been treated with Carfilzomib and Ixazomib respectively. 15 (33%) patients had prior high dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplant. 20 (44%) patients required dose reduction of pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide or dexamethasone. 89% of patients experience adverse events (AEs) of any grade. Of the 297 episodes of AEs, 43% are grade 3 or higher, with 50% of these episodes related to the study drugs. 57% of patients experienced serious AEs (SAEs) of any grade. Of the 74 episodes of SAE, 89% are grade 3 or higher, with 49% of these episodes related to the study drugs. Almost all of these events are related to cytopenias and infections. 20 (44%) of the patients develop grade 3 neutropenic fever and 9 (20%) patients have grade 3 or higher pneumonia. Only 1 patient experienced grade 3 peripheral neuropathy, 1 patient develop grade 3 pulmonary embolism, 1 patient developed grade 3 venous thromboembolism, and 1 patient experienced grade 3 renal impairment. At a median follow-up of 10.9 months, 9 of the 46 patients have died, and 21 have progressed. Three patients withdrew due to toxicity. While the overall response of the study population is not part of this interim analysis, we assessed the response of patients from the National University Cancer Institute, Singapore which has the highest number of patients recruited to get an idea of the therapeutic efficacy. Of the 14 patients recruited at NCIS, 1 patient achieved CR, 3 VGPR, 7 PR, producing a response rate of 79%. Conclusion In this interim analysis of a prospective randomized study of pomalidomide and dexamethasone with or without cyclophosphamide in Asian patients, we demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of this combination. Longer follow-up and final analysis of the study will be needed to ascertain the therapeutic advantage of PCD over PD in relapse and refractory myeloma that is refractory to lenalidomide. References 1. Baz RC, Martin TG 3rd, Lin HY, Zhao X, Shain KH, Cho HJ, Wolf JL, Mahindra A, Chari A, Sullivan DM, Nardelli LA, Lau K, Alsina M, Jagannath S. Randomized multicenter phase 2 study of pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone in relapsed refractory myeloma. Blood. 2016 May 26;127(21):2561-8. 2. Soekojo CY, Kim K, Huang SY, Chim CS, Takezako N, Asaoku H, Kimura H, Kosugi H, Sakamoto J, Gopalakrishnan SK, Nagarajan C, Wei Y, Moorakonda R, Lee SL, Lee JJ, Yoon SS, Kim JS, Min CK, Lee JH, Durie B,Chng WJ. 3. Pomalidomide and dexamethasone combination with additional cyclophosphamide in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (AMN001)-a trial by the Asian Myeloma Network. Blood Cancer J. 2019 Oct 8;9(10):83. Disclosures Chng: Novartis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kim:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy.

Download Full-text