Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Obese Patients with Venous Thromboembolism

Background: Obesity is a well-known risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), however, obese patients are under-represented in clinical trials (1;2). Four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been approved for the treatment of acute VTE (3-6), including the direct Factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban and the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran. Given the lack of data in this population, it is unclear if DOACs can be used safely. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs for the treatment of VTE in obese patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-centre cohort study in London (Canada) to compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs for the treatment of acute VTE in obese patients. We screened electronic and hard copy charts of adult patients referred to our thrombosis clinic for treatment of an objectively confirmed acute VTE between January 2012 and December 2017. Patients treated with DOACs or Warfarin were selected and followed from diagnosis of the index event until cessation of anticoagulation or up to 1 year. Our study population was analyzed by BMI (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2versus < 30 kg/m2) and body weight (≥120 kg vs. <120 kg). Patients were excluded if they were on anticoagulation therapy for conditions other than VTE (e.g; atrial fibrillation), cancer-associated thrombosis, or missing data. The primary outcome measure was VTE recurrence during the anticoagulation treatment period and was defined according to the ISTH criteria (7). Our secondary outcome was the occurrence of bleeding events A bleeding event is defined as: a) Major Bleeding: bleed resulting in a hemoglobin drop of > 20 g/L, clinically overt and requiring more than 2 units of packed red blood cells, a hemorrhage requiring permanent cessation of anticoagulation and any retroperitoneal or intracranial hemorrhage; b) Minor Bleeding: bleed with no or little clinical significance, associated with no cost and does not require medical evaluation; and c) clinically significant non-major bleeding: does not fulfill criteria for major or minor bleeding but requires patients to be seek medical attention and/or minor procedures (8). Groups were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, as appropriate. The significance level was set at 0.05. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for VTE recurrence and bleeding among DOAC groups and patients treated with Warfarin were analyzed by logistic regression. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25 (IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Results: Of 1143 potentially eligible patients, 777 fulfilled our inclusion criteria: 278 (35.8%) obese patients treated with DOACs, 266 (34.2%) non-obese patients on DOACS and 233 (30%) obese patients on Warfarin. Of the patients on DOACs, 80% (n= 436) were on rivaroxaban, while the remaining 20% were either on apixaban or edoxaban (n= 108). Among patients on DOACs VTE recurrence was observed in 2.1% (N=6) of patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and 2.8% (N=2) of patients with 120 kg or more, with no differences in the risk of VTE recurrence (Table 1). The proportion of major bleeding events for patients on DOACs was 1.1% (N=3) for patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and 1.4% (N=1) for patients with 120kg or more. There were no significant differences with respect to major and total bleeding risk (Table1). When comparing obese patients on DOACs vs Warfarin we did not find differences in the risk of VTE recurrence among patients with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 [RR 2.59 95% IC (0.51-12.96), p= 0. 247] or body weight ≥120 kg [RR 4.33 95% IC (0.21-89.43), p= 0. 337] (Table 2). Among obese patients those treated with DOACs had a similar proportion and risk of total bleeding and major bleeding events compared to those on warfarin (Table 2). Conclusions: Our retrospective study suggests that DOACs at standard doses appear to have similar efficacy and safety in obese patients as defined herein. However, since most of our patients were treated with rivaroxaban, information on other agents is inconclusive. Information on patients with extreme body weight was limited. Disclosures Louzada: Bayer: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in malignancy induced venous thromboembolism-a systematic review and meta analysis

European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care ◽

10.1093/ehjacc/zuab020.199 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

A Abdul Razzack ◽

N Hussain ◽

S Adeel Hassan ◽

S Mandava ◽

F Yasmin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Molecular Weight ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Low Molecular Weight ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Dichotomous Data ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background- Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been proven to be more effective in the management of venous thromboembolism (MVTE). The efficacy and safety of LMWH or DOACs in treatment of recurrent or malignancy induced VTE is not studied in literature. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of LMWH and DOACs in the management of malignancy induced VTE Methods- Electronic databases ( PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane) were searched from inception to November 28th, 2020. Dichotomous data was extracted for prevention of VTE and risk of major bleeding in patients taking either LMWH or DOACs. Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated from dichotomous data using Mantel Haenszel (M-H) random-effects with statistical significance to be considered if the confidence interval excludes 1 and p < 0.05. Results- Three studies with 2607 patients (DOACs n = 1301 ; LMWH n = 1306) were included in analysis. All the study population had active cancer of any kind diagnosed within the past 6 months. Average follow-up period for each trial was 6 months. Patients receiving DOACs have a lower odds of recurrence of MVTE as compared to LMWH( OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.17-2.09; P = 0.003, I2 = 0). There was no significant difference in major bleeding among patients receiving LMWH or DOACs (OR-0.71, 95%CI 0.46-1.10, P = 0.13, I2 = 22%) (Figure 1). We had no publication bias in our results (Egger’s regression p > 0.05). Conclusion- DOACs are superior to LMWH in prevention of MVTE and have similar major bleeding risk as that of LMWH. Abstract Figure. A)VTE Recurrence B)Major Bleeding events

Download Full-text

Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism and stroke prophylaxis in patients with hematologic malignancies

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice ◽

10.1177/1078155219848810 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 26 (2) ◽

pp. 351-360 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Stephanie Kim ◽

Jennifer Namba ◽

Aaron M Goodman ◽

Thi Nguyen ◽

Ila M Saunders

Keyword(s):

Molecular Weight ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Low Molecular Weight ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulant ◽

Low Molecular Weight Heparins ◽

Bleeding Events

Purpose Low-molecular-weight heparins are currently the recommended antithrombotic therapy for treatment and prevention of malignancy-related venous thromboembolism. Currently, the evidence evaluating direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins or a vitamin K antagonist in cancer patients with hematologic malignancies is limited. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism treatment or stroke prevention for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in patients with hematologic malignancies. Methods This was a retrospective evaluation of adult patients with hematologic malignancies who received at least one dose of the Food and Drug Administration-approved direct oral anticoagulant for venous thromboembolism treatment or stroke prevention. We determined the frequency of major bleeding events, non-major bleeding events, stroke, systemic embolism, appropriateness of initial direct oral anticoagulant doses, holding practices prior to procedures, and the rate of all-cause mortality. An analysis was also performed to compare the incidence of bleeding between patients with a history of hematopoietic stem cell transplant to non-transplant patients. Results A total of 103 patients were identified, with the majority of patients receiving rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism treatment. Major bleeding events occurred in four patients and no fatal bleeding events occurred. Non-major bleeding occurred in 29 patients, most commonly epistaxis and bruising. Two patients experienced a systemic embolism while on direct oral anticoagulant therapy. Conclusion Direct oral anticoagulants may be a safe and effective alternative for anticoagulation therapy in patients with hematologic malignancies. However, larger prospective studies comparing direct oral anticoagulants to low-molecular-weight heparins or vitamin K antagonists are warranted to compare efficacy and safety outcomes in this patient population.

Download Full-text

Dose reduction of edoxaban preserves efficacy and safety for the treatment of venous thromboembolism

Thrombosis and Haemostasis ◽

10.1160/th16-03-0244 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 116 (10) ◽

pp. 747-753 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Philip S. Wells ◽

Annelise Segers ◽

Walter Ageno ◽

Marjolein P. A. Brekelmans ◽

Alexander T. Cohen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Body Weight ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Dose Reduction ◽

Drug Exposure ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

P Glycoprotein ◽

Recurrent Vte ◽

Glycoprotein Inhibitors

SummaryDirect oral anticoagulants simplify venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment by obviating the need for coagulation monitoring. Nonetheless, renal function, body weight and P-glycoprotein inhibitors influence drug levels. The objective of this analysis was to determine whether reduction in edoxaban dose based on clinical criteria avoids excess drug exposure and preserves efficacy and safety in the Hokusai-VTE study. After initial heparin, patients received edoxaban or warfarin for 3-12 months. Edoxaban was given once daily at a dose of 60 mg, which was reduced to 30 mg in patients with a creatinine clearance of 30–50 ml/minute, body weight ≤60 kg or receiving certain P-glycoprotein inhibitors. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent VTE and the principal safety outcome was major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding. A total of 8292 patients with acute VTE were randomised, 733 and 719 patients in the edoxaban and warfarin groups met the criteria for dose reduction. These patients were older, more often female or Asian and had more extensive VTE. Edoxaban levels were lower in the 30 mg edoxaban group. Rates of recurrent VTE and bleeding with the 30 mg and 60 mg edoxaban dose were comparable: VTE rates were 3.0 % and 3.2 % and clinically relevant bleeding rates were 7.9 % and 8.6 %, respectively. Rates of recurrent VTE and bleeding in the warfarin-treated patients meeting the criteria for dose reduction were 4.2 % and 12.8 %, respectively. The reduced dose edoxaban regimen maintained efficacy and safety compared with the 60 mg dose but was safer than warfarin in patients meeting the criteria for dose reduction.Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

Download Full-text

The Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Vs. Traditional Anticoagulants in Patients with Cirrhosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.5015.5015 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 5015-5015

Author(s):

Justin Hum ◽

Janice Jou ◽

Thomas G. Deloughery ◽

Joseph Shatzel

Keyword(s):

Major Bleeding ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Vitamin K Antagonists ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Bleeding Complications ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Recurrent Thrombosis ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Cirrhotic Patients

Abstract Introduction: The coagulopathy associated with cirrhosis is complex and places patients at risk for both bleeding and thrombosis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been shown to have superior efficacy and safety compared to vitamin K antagonists; however their efficacy and safety in cirrhotic patients is not clear. The aim of this study is to retrospectively compare the effectiveness and bleeding complications of DOACs as compared to traditional anticoagulants in cirrhotic patients. Methods: This study was a retrospective review of patients treated at a single academic center between 2012-2015 who were prescribed a DOAC (apixaban or rivaroxaban), or a traditional anticoagulant (warfarin or low molecular weight heparin), with an ICD-9 code for the diagnosis of cirrhosis. The primary outcomes of interest are recurrent thrombosis or stroke (efficacy failure), or bleeding events (safety failure). Major bleeds were characterized as fatal bleeding, symptomatic bleeding in critical organ area, or bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin level >2 or leading to transfusion of 2+ units of packed red blood cells. Results: During the study period, 27 cirrhotic patients were prescribed a DOAC and 18 were prescribed a traditional anticoagulant (either LMWH or warfarin). Both groups had similar total bleeding events (8 DOAC vs. 10 traditional anticoagulation, p = 0.12). There were significantly less major bleeding episodes in the DOAC group, (1 (4%) vs. 5 (28%), p = 0.03) and less intracranial bleeding (3 (17% ) vs. 0 (0%) p=0.06). Recurrent thrombosis or stroke occurred in 1 (4%) patient in the DOAC group and 1 (6%) patient in the traditional group (p = 1.0). Conclusions: Anticoagulation with DOACs in cirrhotic patients may be as safe as traditional anticoagulants with respect to bleeding events. Patients with cirrhosis at our center prescribed DOACs had less major bleeding events, while maintaining efficacy at preventing stroke or recurrent thrombosis. Table Table. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Direct oral factor Xa inhibitors for the treatment of acute cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.e23156 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e23156-e23156

Author(s):

Harry E Fuentes ◽

Robert McBane ◽

Waldemar Wysokinski ◽

Alfonso Javier Tafur ◽

Charles L. Loprinzi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Indirect Comparison ◽

Factor Xa ◽

Factor Xa Inhibitors ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Patients With Cancer

e23156 Background: A direct meta-analysis was performed to explore the efficacy and safety of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors with dalteparin in patients with cancer associated acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). Also, the comparative efficacy and safety of apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban was assessed with a network meta-analysis. Methods: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE were searched for trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to dalteparin for the management of cancer associated acute VTE. A network meta-analysis using both frequentist and Bayesian methods was performed to analyze VTE recurrence, major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). Results: Three randomized control trials, at low risk of bias, enrolled 1,739 patients with cancer associated VTE. Direct comparison showed a lower rate of VTE recurrence in DOAC compared to dalteparin groups (odds Ratio [OR]:0.48, 95% Confidence interval [CI]:0.24-0.96; I2:46%). Indirect comparison suggested that apixaban had greater reduction in VTE recurrence compared to dalteparin (OR: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.01–0.82), but not rivaroxaban or edoxaban. Apixaban also had the highest probability of being ranked most effective. By direct comparisons, there was an increased likelihood of major bleeding in the DOAC group compared to dalteparin (OR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.04–2.78). CRNMB did not differ. Indirect estimates were imprecise. Subgroup analyses in gastrointestinal cancers suggested that dalteparin may have the lowest risk of bleeding whereas estimates in urothelial cancer were imprecise. Conclusions: DOACs appear to lower the risk of VTE recurrence compared to daltaparin while increasing major bleeding. Apixaban may be associated with the lowest risk of VTE recurrence compared to the other DOACs.

Download Full-text

Calculation of HAS-BLED Score Is Useful for Early Identification of Venous Thromboembolism Patients at High Risk for Major Bleeding Events: A Prospective Outpatients Cohort Study

Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis ◽

10.1055/s-0037-1607433 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 44 (04) ◽

pp. 348-352 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Reinhard Raggam ◽

Franz Hafner ◽

Alexander Avian ◽

Gerald Hackl ◽

Gerhard Cvirn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Odds Ratio ◽

Bleeding Complications ◽

Minor Bleeding ◽

Prospective Evaluation ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Major Bleeding Events

AbstractThe aim of this study was prospective evaluation of the performance of the HAS-BLED score in predicting major bleeding complications in a real-world outpatient cohort, during long-term anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE), treated with a broad spectrum of anticoagulants. We analyzed 111 outpatients objectively diagnosed with VTE and treated long-term with various anticoagulants. Patients were grouped in three cohorts based on the anticoagulant regimen. Calculation of the HAS-BLED score and documentation of bleeding events were performed every 6 months for 1 year. Patients with a HAS-BLED score ≥ 3 had an increased risk for major bleeding events (odds ratio [OR]: 13.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96–692.58, p = 0.028) and a trend to higher risk for minor bleeding events as well (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 0.87–5.85, p = 0.091) when compared with patients with a HAS-BLED score < 3.This indicates that a HAS-BLED score ≥ 3 allows for identification of patients with VTE on long-term anticoagulation at an increased risk for major bleeding events, irrespective of the anticoagulant agent used.

Download Full-text

MAC Project—Monitoring Anticoagulant Therapy Observational Study: Rationale and Protocol

Frontiers in Medicine ◽

10.3389/fmed.2020.584459 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 ◽

Author(s):

Giuseppe Camporese ◽

Enrico Bernardi ◽

Cristiano Bortoluzzi ◽

Franco Noventa ◽

Ngoc Vo Hong ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Observational Study ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Real Life ◽

Minor Bleeding ◽

Italian Population ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Clinical Trial Registration

Real-life studies complement data from registrative trials. Because of the delayed registration of direct oral anticoagulants in Italy, scarce real-life data on such treatments is available for the Italian population. The aim of the MAC project is to collect real-life clinical information in unselected patients given oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism, during a 5-year follow-up period. This is a prospective-cohort, multi-center, observational study performed in four Italian centers. The estimated samples size is 4,000 patients. The efficacy outcomes are: incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism and of post-thrombotic syndrome. The safety outcomes are: incidence of major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, minor bleeding, serious adverse events, and mortality. The MAC project has the potential to improve our understanding of the epidemiology and of the therapeutic strategies adopted in Italian patients with venous thromboembolism.Clinical Trial Registration: WWW.ClinicalTrials.Gov, identifier: NCT0432939.

Download Full-text

Enoxaparin Dosing for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Low Body Weight Patients

Clinical Medicine Insights: Blood Disorders ◽

10.1177/1179545x19863814 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 12 ◽

pp. 1179545X1986381 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Daniel Dybdahl ◽

Grant Walliser ◽

Michelle Pershing ◽

Christy Collins ◽

David Robinson

Keyword(s):

Body Weight ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

The Elderly ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Minor Bleeding ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Thromboembolism Prophylaxis ◽

Vte Prophylaxis ◽

The Impact

Background: The appropriate dose of enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in low body weight patients is unknown. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of enoxaparin dosing on major and minor bleeding events in low body weight patients. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients weighing less than 45 kg receiving subcutaneous (SC) enoxaparin for VTE prevention. The primary objective was to determine whether enoxaparin dose was associated with major and minor bleeding. The secondary objective was to determine the incidence of VTE by enoxaparin dose. Results: There were 173 patients included in the study, of which 37 patients received 2 different courses of enoxaparin during hospitalization, resulting in 210 enoxaparin courses. Among all enoxaparin courses, 16.2% were associated with major bleeding and 5.2% with minor bleeding. There was no difference in the incidence of major bleeding by dose (enoxaparin 30 mg SC daily, 30 mg SC twice daily, or 40 mg SC daily; P = .409). Patients who experienced major bleeding were older (54.9 ± 16.1 years) than patients who did not (48.4 ± 18.4 years) ( P = .043). There was no difference in the incidence of minor bleeding by dosing schedule ( P = .14). No patients experienced a VTE. Conclusion and Relevance: The risk of bleeding was similar by enoxaparin dose but increased with age in low body weight patients. Given the low incidence of VTE in this study, it is reasonable to consider decreasing the prophylactic enoxaparin dose in low body weight patients, especially in the elderly population.

Download Full-text

Abstract 14569: Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism in Obese Patients: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.142.suppl_3.14569 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽

Author(s):

Vicky Mai ◽

Emmanuelle Marceau-Ferron ◽

Laurent BERTOLETTI ◽

Yves Lacasse ◽

Sebastien Bonnet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Random Effect ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Morbidly Obese ◽

Obese Patients ◽

Efficacy And Safety

Background: Obesity is a real burden and its prevalence is constantly increasing. High body weight is a risk factor for developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). Direct oral anticoagulants’ (DOAC) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are affected by obesity. Their efficacy and safety in obese (BMI ≥30kg/m 2 ) and morbidly obese (BMI ≥40kg/m 2 ) patients are still unclear in the treatment of VTE. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of DOAC with vitamin K antagonist (VKA)/low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in the acute treatment of VTE in obese and morbidly obese patients. The primary efficacy outcome was VTE recurrences. The safety outcomes were major bleeding (MB) and clinically relevant non-MB (CRNMB). All-cause mortality was also assessed. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that DOAC would present the same efficacy and safety for the treatment of acute VTE in obese and morbidly obese patients compared to VKA/LMWH. Methods: A systematic literature search (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science) was conducted from inception to April 15 th 2020, identifying trials studying DOAC in the treatment of acute VTE in obese patients. Studies were included if one of the outcomes was reported. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment and strength of body evidence evaluation using the GRADE methodology. Analyses were conducted using the Mantel-Haenszel method based on a random-effect model. Relative risks (RR) were estimated for the effect measure with 95% confidence intervals. Results: From 1240 citations screened, we included 21 studies (58,590 patients). VTE recurrences was similar with DOAC compared to VKA/LMWH in obese patients (risk ratio (RR): 1.03; 95%CI 0.93-1.15; p=0.55) and morbidly obese patients (RR 1.06; 95CI 0.94-1.19; p=0.35). DOAC was associated with a reduction in MB in obese patients (RR 0.57; 95%CI 0.34-0.94; p=0.03) and morbidly obese patients (RR 0.71; 95%CI 0.50-1.00; p=0.05) compared to VKA/LMWH. In obese patients, no difference was observed in CRNMB with DOAC compared to VKA/LMWH. Conclusion: DOAC is as effective in reducing VTE and is associated with less MB compared to VKA/LMWH in obese and morbidly obese patients.

Download Full-text

Direct oral anticoagulants compared with vitamin K antagonists for acute venous thromboembolism: evidence from phase 3 trials

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2014-04-571232 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (12) ◽

pp. 1968-1975 ◽

Cited By ~ 387

Author(s):

Nick van Es ◽

Michiel Coppens ◽

Sam Schulman ◽

Saskia Middeldorp ◽

Harry R. Büller

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Vitamin K Antagonists ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Similar Efficacy ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Key Points ◽

Acute Venous Thromboembolism

Key Points DOACs have similar efficacy as VKAs in the treatment of acute symptomatic VTE, but significantly reduce the risk of major bleeding. The efficacy and safety of DOACs in the treatment of acute VTE are consistent in clinically important subgroups.

Download Full-text