Biomarkers of Response to Romiplostim in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Thrombocytopenia - Results of the Europe Trial By the Emsco Network

Introduction: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and peripheral cytopenia. In about half of patients with lower-risk (LR) MDS, thrombocytopenia is present at the time of diagnosis and associated with shortened survival and an increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) romiplostim has shown safety and marked efficacy in a still poorly-defined subset of LR-MDS patients with thrombocytopenia. Methods: The EUROPE multicenter phase 2 trial within the EMSCO network investigated the impact of biomarkers like endogenous thrombopoietin (TPO) level and platelet transfusion events (PTE) on the efficacy of romiplostim (750µg SC qw) treatment in patients with LR-MDS (IPSS low/int-1). Patients were eligible if baseline bone marrow blast count was <5% as assessed by central morphology and platelet counts were ≤30 Gpt/L or ≤50 Gpt/L in case of bleeding history. According to a previously published model of response to TPO-RA (Sekeres at al. BJH 2014), patients were assigned into 3 different cohorts at the time of screening based on their previous PTE as well as centrally assessed TPO serum levels (cohort A: TPO<500 ng/l, PTE<6 units/past year; cohort B: TPO<500 ng/l, PTE≥6 units or TPO≥500 ng/l, PTE<6 units, cohort C: TPO≥500 ng/l, PTE≥6 units). Primary endpoint of the study was the rate of hematologic improvement of platelets (HI-P) according to IWG 2006 criteria after 16 weeks of romiplostim treatment. We here present the analysis for the first 16 weeks of romiplostim treatment. Results: From 2015 to 2018, a total of 68 patients were included in 20 trial sites in Germany, France and Czech Republic. Patients displayed a median age of 74 years and a median platelet count of 25 G/L (range 1-50 G/L) and were stratified into cohort A (n=47), B (n=17) or C (n=4), respectively. All patients received at least one cycle of romiplostim with a median weekly dose of 750μg and a median of 15 cycles of romiplostim until week 16. Reasons for premature study discontinuation before week 16 were investigator/patient decision (n=8), adverse events (n=5), disease progression (n=4) or death (n=1). There were 9 reported severe treatment-related adverse events in seven patients including pulmonary embolism (n=1), subacute stroke (n=1), mucocutaneous hemorrhage (n=1), asthenia (n=1), suspicion of anti-romiplostim antibodies (n=1), progression to AML (n=1) and varicella zoster infection (n=1). Two patients had transient increases in peripheral blasts to more than 10% and 1 patient progressed to AML after 1 month of treatment. HI-P was observed in 26 of 68 (38%) patients, while response was ongoing in 24 of them beyond week 16. Moreover, rate of HI-P lasting for at least 8 weeks was notably higher in cohort A (45%, n=21/47) compared to patients in cohort B and C (24%, n=5/21) (p=0.11). Median peak increase of PLT count in responding patients was 199 G/L in cohort A and 83 G/L in cohort B (p=0.25) and was observed in median after 7 weeks (range 3-16). In addition, responses occurred also in 2 patients in the neutrophil (HI-N) and in 7 patients in the erythroid (HI-E) lineage according to IWG 2006 criteria (Table 1). Explorative analysis showed a correlation between pretreatment platelet transfusion requirement and endogenous TPO-levels (spearman-test, p=0.034). Median pretreatment endogenous TPO-level was lower in responders compared to non-responders (82 vs. 103 pg/ml, p=0.15). Higher response rates occurred in patients with lower TPO-levels (<500 ng/l) and lower pre-treatment transfusion needs (PTE<6 units/past year), but both variables were not significantly associated with response to romiplostim (univariable logistic regression, p= 0.13 and p=0.53, respectively). Evaluation of the mutational profile in a subgroup of 49 patients demonstrated that 67% of responders exhibited spliceosome mutations including SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1 and ZRSR2 compared to 35% in non-responders (p=0.06) (Table 1). Conclusion: This prospective study confirms that romiplostim treatment is highly effective in a subgroup of LR-MDS patients, but neither baseline platelet transfusion requirements nor baseline TPO levels were significantly associated with clinical response to romiplostim. Further translational analyses are ongoing to elucidate potential biomarkers of response. Disclosures Platzbecker: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Götze:AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cony-Makhoul:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Park:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Thiede:Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AgenDix GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; Diaceutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ades:Helsinn Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Silence Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Romiplostim is formally not licensed for the treatment of thrombocytopenia due to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Download Full-text

Development and Testing of a Lymphoma Clinical Trials Specific Frailty Index: A Secondary Analysis of the LY.12 Clinical Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153037 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4076-4076

Author(s):

Abi Vijenthira ◽

Xinzhi Li ◽

Michael Crump ◽

Annette E. Hay ◽

Lois E. Shepherd ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Frailty Index ◽

Secondary Analysis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Frail Patients ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background: Frailty is common in older patients with lymphoma. However, it remains unknown whether frailty is prevalent in patients included in clinical trials of lymphoma, as those with frailty may meet inclusion criteria of a trial which do not include functional information beyond performance status (PS). Understanding the prevalence and impact of frailty in clinical trials is important to direct future stratification criteria, as well as to have robust data to counsel frail patients on their potential outcomes. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis using data from the phase III LY.12 clinical trial in which patients with relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma were randomized to gemcitabine-dexamethasone-cisplatin or dexamethasone-high dose cytarabine-cisplatin chemotherapy prior to autologous stem cell transplant. The primary objective of our study was to construct a lymphoma clinical trials specific frailty index (FI) using previously described methods (Searle. BMC Geriatr. 2008;8:24). Secondary objectives were to describe the association of frailty (binary variable) with overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), hospitalization, adverse events (AE), serious adverse events (SAE), and proceeding to transplant, and to describe the association of frailty with these outcomes, controlling for important covariates (age, sex, immunophenotype, revised international prognostic index score (rIPI), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS, stage, and response to previous chemotherapy). Results: 619 patients in the LY12 trial were used to construct the frailty index (Table 1). Using a binary cut-off for frailty (<0.2), 15% (N=93) of patients were classified as frail. There were no differences in age or sex between frail and non-frail patients; however they differed in terms of other lymphoma-related characteristics (Table 2). Frailty was strongly associated with OS (HR 2.012, 95% CI 1.57-2.58), EFS (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.53-2.46), frequency of the worst overall Grade >3 AE (OR 2.65 (15% vs. 6%), p=0.003), and likelihood of proceeding to ASCT (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.15-0.43), but not hospitalization (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.97-2.40) or SAE (6% vs. 4%, p=0.3). In multivariable analysis, frailty was not significantly associated with OS, EFS, likelihood of proceeding to ASCT, nor hospitalization (Table 3), though there was a trend to significance for ASCT. However, rIPI remained significantly associated with OS and EFS, ECOG remained significantly associated with OS (Table 3) Conclusion: A potentially broadly applicable lymphoma clinical trials specific FI was constructed through secondary analysis of LY12 data. 15% of patients were classified as frail. Frailty was significantly associated with OS, EFS, frequency of grade >3 AE and likelihood of proceeding to transplant. However, this relationship no longer was significant when controlling for lymphoma-related prognostic variables, suggesting that the impact of poor prognostic features of lymphoma supersede the impact of frailty alone in this younger clinical trial population. Interestingly, rIPI and ECOG demonstrated their value as simple predictors that are highly associated with OS and/or EFS even when controlling for other important covariates including frailty. These findings require further testing in an external data set, and would be particularly valuable to test in an older population. Calibration of the FI against clinical frailty assessment (e.g. Clinical Frailty Scale, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment) would also be meaningful to confirm its ability to classify frail versus non-frail patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Crump: Epizyme: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Kyte/Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hay: Merck: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Prica: Astra-Zeneca: Honoraria; Kite Gilead: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Clinical Parameters in 391 Iron-Overloaded Patients with Lower-Risk MDS Enrolled in a Prospective, Non-Interventional Multicenter Registry.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.4834.4834 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 4834-4834

Author(s):

Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽

Billie J. Marek ◽

Roger M. Lyons ◽

Noelia Martinez-Lopez ◽

Carole Paley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Iron Overload ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Serum Ferritin ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chelation Therapy ◽

Iron Chelation ◽

Iron Chelation Therapy ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Impact

Abstract Abstract 4834 Introduction Despite recent improvements in therapies for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), 60–80% will require continuing packed red cell blood (pRBC) transfusions for prolonged periods. Complications resulting from the iron burden may, therefore, become clinically significant for many patients during the course of their disease. Patients with lower-risk MDS have a greater chance of developing the long-term toxicity of iron overload because of their prolonged survival, and are more likely to benefit from effective iron chelation therapy. This report describes data from a registry designed to study the impact of iron overload and iron chelation therapy on organ function and survival in patients with lower-risk MDS. Methods This is an ongoing, prospective, non-interventional, multicenter 5-year registry in 107 US centers, enrolling 600 patients (aged ≥18 years) with lower-risk MDS (by WHO, FAB and/or IPSS criteria) and transfusional iron overload (defined as serum ferritin ≥1000 μg/L and/or having received ≤20 cumulative pRBC units and/or an ongoing transfusion requirement ≥6 units every 12 weeks). Follow-up will be performed at least every 6 months for a maximum of 60 months or until death. Recommended assessments include serum ferritin, creatinine, calculated creatinine clearance, echocardiograms, and endocrine and hematological status. Results As of May 31 2009, 391 patients have enrolled in the registry. Demographic data are available from 389 patients. Median age: 74.4 years (range 21–99); male: 218, female: 171; ethnicity: 331 Caucasian (85%), 25 African-American (6%), 24 Hispanic (6%), five Asian (1%), two Native American (0.5%), and two other (0.5%). The median time since diagnosis (n=385) was <3 years in 217 patients (56%); ≥3–<5 years in 72 (19%); ≥5–<7 years in 48 (12%); and ≥7 years in 48 (12%). The MDS classification of the patients by WHO, FAB and IPSS, as well as patients' serum ferritin and transfusion burden, are summarized in the table. The most frequent concomitant conditions classified by organ (n=384 patients) were: 205 (53%) patients with vascular, 160 (42%) endocrine, and 171 (45%) cardiac dysfunction. At registry entry, 249 patients were receiving erythropoietin; 61 granulocyte colony stimulating factor; seven hydroxyurea; 25 thalidomide (Thalomid); 147 5-azacytidine (Vidaza); 95 lenalidomide (Revlimid) and 90 decitabine (Dacogen). 137 of 391 (35%) patients were on iron chelation therapy at study entry: 34 (9%) received deferoxamine for mean and median treatment durations of 803 and 383 (range 1–4386) days, respectively, while 117 (30%) received deferasirox for mean and median durations of 488 and 396 (9–1269) days, respectively. Calculated creatinine clearance was normal (>80 mL/min) in 37 (9%) patients; mildly abnormal (51–80 mL/min) in 30 (8%); and moderately abnormal (30–50 mL/min) in nine (2%) patients. Conclusions These baseline data indicate the demographic distribution as well as the co-morbidities associated with lower-risk MDS patients. In spite of recent guidelines, fewer than 50% of iron-overloaded patients are receiving any iron chelation treatment, despite the presence of cardiac, vascular and endocrine concomitant conditions in 40-54% of patients. Recent retrospective data highlights the impact of chelation on mortality in lower-risk MDS patients. This ongoing registry will prospectively assess the impact of iron chelation on survival and organ function in iron-overloaded patients with lower-risk MDS. Disclosures Lyons: Novartis: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genzyme: Research Funding. Martinez-Lopez:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Paley:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Greenberg:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Development and Validation of a Model to Predict Response to Romiplostim in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2801.2801 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2801-2801 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽

Aristoteles Giagounidis ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Ghulam J. Mufti ◽

Pierre Fenaux ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Platelet Transfusion ◽

Platelet Response ◽

Likelihood Ratios ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Platelet Counts ◽

The Past ◽

Transfusion Requirements

Abstract Abstract 2801 Background: Recommendations for use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in anemic patients with MDS are based on baseline endogenous erythropoietin levels and red blood cell transfusion requirements, factors which predict the likelihood of a response to ESA treatment. These recommendations for ESA use have been incorporated into quality-of-care treatment guidelines for MDS. We examined whether baseline endogenous thrombopoietin (TPO) levels and platelet transfusion requirements likewise predict response of thrombocytopenic MDS patients to treatment with romiplostim, a TPO receptor agonist. Patients and Methods: In a placebo(PBO)-controlled trial of romiplostim (randomized 2:1) in 250 thrombocytopenic [median (Q1, Q3) baseline platelet count 19.3 (12.5, 30.3) × 109/L] IPSS low/int-1 MDS patients, study drug was discontinued early due to data monitoring committee concerns that the potential small benefit seen in the reduction of bleeding did not outweigh the potential risk for disease progression to AML and that the transient increases in blast cell counts may put patients at risk for diagnosis of and treatment for AML. Hematologic improvement of platelets (HI-P, per IWG 2006) is defined as 8 consecutive weeks of an absolute platelet increase of 30×109/L (for patients with baseline platelet counts >20×109/L) or an increase from <20×109/L to >20×109/L and by at least 100% (for patients with baseline platelet counts <20×109/L). In this trial of romiplostim in MDS, HI-P rates were higher with romiplostim than PBO (36.5% vs. 3.6%, odds ratio 15.6, p<0.001) as were median platelet counts from Week 4 on (p<0.001). Data from this trial were used to examine the relationship between baseline TPO levels and platelet transfusion needs and outcomes. TPO levels (in pg/mL) were assessed by ELISA at baseline, weeks 14, 28, 42, and at the end of treatment. In this study, platelet response is defined as meeting the same criteria as HI-P, but for 1 week as opposed to for 8 consecutive weeks. As with the ESA model (Hellstrom-Lindberg BJH 1997), a TPO model was developed from log-likelihood ratios and logistic coefficients, with scaling of the log-likelihood ratios to obtain predictive scores. The TPO model was then validated using data from a previous phase 1/2 study of romiplostim in lower-risk thrombocytopenic MDS patients (Sekeres Cancer 2010, Kantarjian J Clin Onc 2009). Variables analyzed in formulating the model included baseline platelet count, number of platelet units transfused in the past year, and baseline endogenous TPO levels. Results: For romiplostim-treated patients (N = 167), the median age was 71 years, the most common WHO subgroups were RCMD (68.3%), RAEB-1 (14.4%), and MDS-U (9.6%), and IPSS scores were 0 (24.0%), 0.5 (51.5%), 1 (20.4%), 1.5 (0.6%), and missing (3.6%). Median (Q1, Q3) baseline TPO levels were 212 (84, 2290) pg/mL. Among romiplostim-treated patients, patients with an HI-P (vs. those not having an HI-P) had lower median baseline TPO levels (172 vs. 236 pg/mL, p = 0.3589) and lower mean baseline TPO levels (854 vs. 1,210, p = 0.0497), and were less likely to have had ≥6 platelet units transfused in the past year (p = 0.0027). For those with a platelet response during ≥50% of study weeks, median baseline TPO levels were lower (138 vs. 1,034 pg/mL, p = 0.0215) as were mean baseline TPO levels (695 vs. 1,390, p = 0.001) and the likelihood of having had ≥6 platelet units transfused in the past year (p = 0.0037). A model for predicting response to romiplostim (i.e., platelet response for ≥50% of weeks) in patients with lower-risk MDS was developed (Figure, top panel). Of note, history of prior platelet transfusion (<6 vs. ≥6 units in the past year) was a better predictor of platelet response than baseline platelet counts. The model was then validated in a second independent romiplostim monotherapy study in MDS, showing a similar pattern of response rates associated with baseline TPO levels and the presence of past platelet transfusions (Figure, bottom panel). Conclusions: For thrombocytopenic patients with lower-risk MDS, lower baseline TPO levels (<500 pg/mL) and limited platelet transfusion history (<6 units in the past year) predict a greater likelihood that a patient will have a platelet response when treated with romiplostim. Disclosures: Sekeres: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: The use of romiplostim in MDS was examined in this abstract. Giagounidis:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Kantarjian:Amgen: Research Funding. Mufti:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Fenaux:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Jia:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yang:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Platzbecker:Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Romiplostim for the Treatment of Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): 5-Year Update From An Open-Label Extension Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.681.681 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 681-681 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

James B. Bussel ◽

David J Kuter ◽

Adrian Newland ◽

Joost TM de Wolf ◽

Jeffrey Wasser ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Target Range ◽

Weekly Dose ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Platelet Counts ◽

Chronic Itp ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 681 Chronic ITP is characterized by increased platelet destruction and suboptimal platelet production. Immunosuppressive ITP therapies may produce only short-term responses and may have issues with toxicity. Romiplostim is a novel peptibody that increases platelet production by a mechanism similar to thrombopoietin; and is approved for the treatment of chronic ITP. We report data from adult patients with chronic ITP treated with romiplostim in an open-label extension study. Collection of safety and efficacy data from long-term treatment of these patients is ongoing. Eligible patients had completed a prior romiplostim study. Romiplostim was administered once weekly by subcutaneous injection, with dose adjustments to maintain platelet counts in the target range (50 to 200 × 109/L). Patients who achieved a stable dose of romiplostim for 3 consecutive weeks were eligible to administer romiplostim at home (by self-injection or by a caregiver); these patients returned to the clinic every 4 weeks for study evaluations. As of May 2009, 291 adult patients had been treated with romiplostim; most were female (63%) and their median time since diagnosis was 4.9 years (range, 1 to 46 years). Thirty-three percent had previously undergone a splenectomy. Patients were treated with romiplostim for a median of 48 weeks (range, 1 to 244 weeks). Two hundred and nineteen patients (75%) were continuing the study at the data cut-off. Home administration of romiplostim was able to be started by 75% of patients; 8/218 patients (4%) discontinued home administration and resumed study-site injection. The median of the average weekly dose across the overall study population was 4 mcg/kg (interquartile range: 2 to 7 mcg/kg). The weekly dose among individual patients remained stable: after week 12, 79% (228/288) of patients were administered a dose of romiplostim within 2 mcg/kg of their most frequent dose at least 90% of the time. Almost all patients (94%) experienced a platelet count ≥50 × 109/L during the study, and more than 50% of patients had platelet counts ≥50 × 109/L on 95% of all study visits. After the first week, median platelet counts remained within the target range (50 to 200 × 109/L) for the duration of the study. Of patients receiving concurrent ITP medication at baseline, 78% (29/37) were able to discontinue or reduce their dose by >25%. Adverse events were reported in 92% of patients overall; the most common were headache (32%); nasopharyngitis (30%); and contusion and fatigue (each 28%). The frequency of adverse events did not increase with time on study (Table). The patient incidence of bleeding events of moderate or greater severity (≥Grade 2) and of clinical significance (≥Grade 3) did not increase over time (Table). Thrombotic events were experienced by 17 (6%) patients and did not increase in frequency over time (Table). Bone marrow reticulin was present or increased in 9 patients with no evidence of progression to collagen fibrosis or chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis. Two patients developed neutralizing antibodies to romiplostim that were absent on retesting after drug withdrawal, with no cross-reactive antibodies to thrombopoietin. Thirteen patients died; 2 deaths were considered by the investigator as possibly related to treatment (unstable angina, myocardial infarction). In conclusion, romiplostim-treated patients were able to maintain platelet counts within the target range, with minimal dose adjustments for up to almost 5 years. Romiplostim was well-tolerated and adverse events did not increase with longer duration of treatment.Table.Summary of patient incidence of adverse events by study periodStudy periodAdverse eventsAny n (%)Serious n (%)Treatment related n (%)Bleeding n (%)Bleeding ≥Grade 2 n (%)Bleeding ≥Grade 3 n (%)Thrombotic events n (%) <24 wks N = 291245 (84)41 (14)68 (23)93 (32)36 (12)12 (4)7 (2) 24 to <48 wks N = 271215 (79)32 (12)31 (11)66 (24)23 (9)5 (2)5 (2) 48 to <72 wks N = 151113 (75)14 (9)18 (12)41 (27)12 (8)2 (1)3 (2) 72 to <96 wks N = 12498 (79)11 (9)4 (11)38 (31)6 (5)1 (1)2 (2) 96 to <120 wks N = 11283 (74)19 (17)8 (7)31 (28)9 (8)1 (1)4 (4) 120 to <144 wks N = 10176 (75)8 (8)7 (7)21 (21)7 (7)1 (1)1 (1) 144 to <168 wks N = 8151 (63)6 (7)2 (3)15 (19)4 (5)00 68 to <192 wks N = 4726 (55)3 (6)2 (4)9 (19)4 (9)1 (2)1 (2) 192 to <216 wks N = 2619 (73)2 (8)010 (39)2 (8)00 216 to <240 wks N = 2417 (71)2 (8)07 (29)2 (8)1 (4)0 >240 wks N = 61 (17)000000 Disclosures: Bussel: Genzyme: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cangene: Research Funding; Amgen: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Ligand: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai, Inc: Research Funding; Sysmex: Research Funding; Scienta: Speakers Bureau; Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kuter:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Esehi: Consultancy; Shionagi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; ONO: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; MGI Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ligand: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Newland:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pangenetics: Consultancy; Schering Plough: Consultancy; Baxter: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Wasser:Amgen Inc.: Speakers Bureau. Chang:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Nie:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Berger:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Rapid and Robust Mobilization of CD34+ HSCs without G-CSF Following Administration of Mgta-145 Alone or in Combination with Plerixafor

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127523 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1961-1961

Author(s):

John F. DiPersio ◽

Jonathan Hoggatt ◽

Steven Devine ◽

Lukasz Biernat ◽

Haley Howell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Single Dose ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Preliminary Data ◽

Research Funding ◽

Fold Change ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Equity Ownership

Background Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is the standard of care for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). G-CSF requires 4-7 days of injections and often multiple aphereses to acquire sufficient CD34+ cells for transplant. The number of CD34+ HSCs mobilized can be variable and patients who fail to mobilize enough CD34+ cells are treated with the combination of G-CSF plus plerixafor. G-CSF use is associated with bone pain, nausea, headaches, fatigue, rare episodes of splenic rupture, and is contraindicated for patients with autoimmune and sickle cell disease. MGTA-145 (GroβT) is a CXCR2 agonist. MGTA-145, in combination with plerixafor, a CXCR4 inhibitor, has the potential to rapidly and reliably mobilize robust numbers of HSCs with a single dose and same-day apheresis for transplant that is free from G-CSF. MGTA-145 plus plerixafor work synergistically to rapidly mobilize HSCs in both mice and non-human primates (Hoggatt, Cell 2018; Goncalves, Blood 2018). Based on these data, Magenta initiated a Phase 1 dose-escalating study to evaluate the safety, PK and PD of MGTA-145 as a single agent and in combination with plerixafor. Methods This study consists of four parts. In Part A, healthy volunteers were dosed with MGTA-145 (0.0075 - 0.3 mg/kg) or placebo. In Part B, MGTA-145 dose levels from Part A were selected for use in combination with a clinically approved dose of plerixafor. In Part C, a single dose MGTA-145 plus plerixafor will be administered on day 1 and day 2. In Part D, MGTA-145 plus plerixafor will be administered followed by apheresis. Results MGTA-145 monotherapy was well tolerated in all subjects dosed (Table 1) with no significant adverse events. Some subjects experienced mild (Grade 1) transient lower back pain that dissipated within minutes. In the ongoing study, the combination of MGTA-145 with plerixafor was well tolerated, with some donors experiencing Grade 1 and 2 gastrointestinal adverse events commonly observed with plerixafor alone. Pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure and maximum plasma concentrations increased dose proportionally and were not affected by plerixafor (Fig 1A). Monotherapy of MGTA-145 resulted in an immediate increase in neutrophils (Fig 1B) and release of plasma MMP-9 (Fig 1C). Neutrophil mobilization plateaued within 1-hour post MGTA-145 at doses greater than 0.03 mg/kg. This plateau was followed by a rebound of neutrophil mobilization which correlated with re-expression of CXCR2 and presence of MGTA-145 at pharmacologically active levels. Markers of neutrophil activation were relatively unchanged (<2-fold vs baseline). A rapid and statistically significant increase in CD34+ cells occurred @ 0.03 and 0.075 mg/kg of MGTA-145 (p < 0.01) relative to placebo with peak mobilization (Fig 1D) 30 minutes post MGTA-145 (7-fold above baseline @ 0.03 mg/kg). To date, the combination of MGTA-145 plus plerixafor mobilized >20/µl CD34s in 92% (11/12) subjects compared to 50% (2/4) subjects receiving plerixafor alone. Preliminary data show that there was a significant increase in fold change relative to baseline in CD34+ cells (27x vs 13x) and phenotypic CD34+CD90+CD45RA- HSCs (38x vs 22x) mobilized by MGTA-145 with plerixafor. Mobilized CD34+ cells were detectable at 15 minutes with peak mobilization shifted 2 - 4 hours earlier for the combination vs plerixafor alone (4 - 6h vs 8 - 12h). Detailed results of single dose administration of MGTA-145 and plerixafor given on one day as well as also on two sequential days will be presented along with fully characterized graft analysis post apheresis from subjects given MGTA-145 and plerixafor. Conclusions MGTA-145 is safe and well tolerated, as a monotherapy and in combination with plerixafor and induced rapid and robust mobilization of significant numbers of HSCs with a single dose in all subjects to date. Kinetics of CD34+ cell mobilization for the combination was immediate (4x increase vs no change for plerixafor alone @ 15 min) suggesting the mechanism of action of MGTA-145 plus plerixafor is different from plerixafor alone. Preliminary data demonstrate that MGTA-145 when combined with plerixafor results in a significant increase in CD34+ fold change relative to plerixafor alone. Magenta Therapeutics intends to develop MGTA-145 as a first line mobilization product for blood cancers, autoimmune and genetic diseases and plans a Phase 2 study in multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in 2020. Disclosures DiPersio: Magenta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; NeoImmune Tech: Research Funding; Cellworks Group, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; RiverVest Venture Partners Arch Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; WUGEN: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bioline Rx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Amphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hoggatt:Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Devine:Kiadis Pharma: Other: Protocol development (via institution); Bristol Myers: Other: Grant for monitoring support & travel support; Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Travel support for advisory board; My employer (National Marrow Donor Program) has equity interest in Magenta. Biernat:Medpace, Inc.: Employment. Howell:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schmelmer:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Neale:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Boitano:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Cooke:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Goncalves:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Raffel:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Falahee:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Morrow:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Davis:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Unexpected Toxicities When Nivolumab Was Given after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123887 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1956-1956

Author(s):

Amy Wang ◽

Justin Kline ◽

Wendy Stock ◽

Satyajit Kosuri ◽

Andrew S. Artz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Relapsed Disease

Background:Treatment options are limited for patients (pts) with hematologic malignancies who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). We hypothesized that checkpoint inhibitors may offer a novel approach for maintaining remission after allo-SCT. Data from pre-clinical studies have suggested a potential role for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Zhang et al., Blood 2009), so it is possible that immunomodulation with checkpoint inhibitors could stimulate the donor anti-leukemia immune response and prevent disease relapse. However, the safety of checkpoint blockade early after allografting remains to be established. Methods:We conducted a pilot study to assess the tolerability and efficacy of Nivolumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, as maintenance therapy after allo-SCT (NCT02985554). Pts were eligible if they were post allo-SCT without evidence of relapse or active graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) or history of prior greater than stage I skin acute GVHD. Nivolumab was to be administered intravenously at 1mg/kg every 2 weeks for 4 doses followed by dosing every 12 weeks. Treatment started 4 weeks after routine immunosuppression was discontinued until 2 years after the transplant. The primary objective was to determine the tolerability of Nivolumab on this schedule. Secondary objectives were evaluation of adverse events, relapse, and overall survival. Results:Four pts were enrolled from December 2017 through November 2018. (Table 1)All pts experienced immune-related adverse events (irAE) from Nivolumab, and 2 (50%) pts experienced serious adverse events. (Table 2)One pt developed grade (G) 4 neutropenia soon after the first dose. (Figure 1)The absolute neutrophil count nadired at 20 cells/µL, at which point pegfilgrastim was administered. An interim bone marrow biopsy (BMBx) confirmed no evidence of relapsed disease. Full neutrophil recovery occurred approximately 3 months after the initial dose, and no subsequent toxicities occurred. Another pt developed G3 autoimmune encephalopathy concurrently with G2 transaminitis and G2 thrombocytopenia after one dose of Nivolumab. (Figure 2)Intravenous methylprednisolone (1mg/kg daily for 3 days) and immunoglobulin (2g/kg in 4 divided doses) were administered, followed by a 7-week steroid taper with full resolution of symptoms. Relapsed disease was ruled out by a BMBx. A third pt developed G2 skin rash approximately 10 days after the first dose of Nivolumab. Skin biopsy demonstrated drug hypersensitivity reaction vs GVHD, and the pt was treated with a 3-week prednisone course (starting at 1mg/kg followed by a taper). A mild flare recurred 2 weeks later, which was treated with topical steroids only. However, Nivolumab was not resumed. The fourth pt developed G2 elevated TSH approximately 2 months into therapy and after 4 doses of Nivolumab. Thyroid hormone replacement was initiated with subsequent symptom improvement and normalization of TSH over a 4-month period. As a result of these unexpected severe toxicities, the study was closed to further enrollment, and further Nivolumab administration ceased. Thus far, one pt (#1) relapsed after a total remission duration of 530 days; the remission duration after starting Nivolumab was 318 days. One pt has mild chronic skin GVHD. All 4 patients remain alive with a median overall survival of 2.3 years (range, 1.9-4.7). Conclusions:Even at low doses, the use of Nivolumab as maintenance therapy in the post allo-SCT setting was not tolerable at the current dosing and schedule due to an unexpected number of high grade irAEs. Additional studies of dose and timing after allo-SCT are needed to improve safety and tolerability, in conjunction with correlative studies to better understand the immunomodulatory processes in the post-transplant setting. Disclosures Kline: Merck: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding. Stock:Kite, a Gilead Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UpToDate: Honoraria; Research to Practice: Honoraria. Artz:Miltenyi: Research Funding. Larson:Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Contracts for clinical trials; Celgene: Consultancy. Riedell:Novartis: Research Funding; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bishop:CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Juno: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Liu:Arog: Other: PI of clinical trial; BMS: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria; Novartis: Other: PI of clinical trial; Karyopharm: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Nivolumab used as maintenance therapy in the post-transplant setting

Download Full-text

To Treat or Not to Treat? Understanding Treatment Patterns in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelofibrosis at the Time of Enrollment in the MOST Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-134958 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 49-51

Author(s):

Rami S. Komrokji ◽

Brady L. Stein ◽

Robyn M. Scherber ◽

Patricia Kalafut ◽

Haobo Ren ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Symptom Burden ◽

Risk Groups ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Low Risk ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Therapy Initiation

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by extramedullary hematopoiesis, bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, and diminished quality of life. Treatment decisions may involve a variety of factors including prognosis and symptomatology. Data regarding real-world disease and demographic factors that contribute to therapy initiation and choice in pts with lower risk MF are limited. This analysis of data from the ongoing Myelofibrosis and Essential Thrombocythemia Observational STudy (MOST; NCT02953704) assessed whether these factors differ for lower risk pts who were treated vs untreated at enrollment. Methods: MOST is a longitudinal, noninterventional, prospective, observational study in pts with MF or essential thrombocythemia enrolled at clinical practices within the US. Pts included in the analysis (≥18 y), had low risk MF by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS; Blood. 2010;115:1703), or intermediate-1 (INT-1) risk by age >65 y alone. Pt data were entered into an electronic case report form during usual-care visits over a planned 36-month observation period. Pt-reported symptom burden was assessed using the MPN-Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF); Total Symptom Score (TSS) was calculated (0 [absent] to 100 [worst imaginable]; J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:4098). Data were analyzed with basic descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Of 233 pts with MF enrolled at 124 sites between 11/29/2016 and 03/29/2019, 205 were included in this analysis; 28 were excluded for being INT-1 risk for reasons other than age. Of the 205 pts, 85 (41.5%) were low- and 120 (58.5%) were INT-1 risk; 56.5% (48/85) and 59.2% (71/120), respectively, were being treated at enrollment. Pt characteristics are listed in Table 1A. Fewer low- vs INT-1 risk pts were JAK2 V617F or MPL positive, and more were CALR positive. The proportion of pts with palpable splenomegaly was similar for treated low- and INT-1 risk pts. In low risk pts, the proportion of pts with palpable splenomegaly was higher in untreated vs treated pts; whereas, in INT-1 risk pts, the opposite was observed (ie, lower proportion in untreated vs treated pts). Blood counts were generally similar across cohorts, except median leukocytes were lower for low risk treated pts and platelet counts were elevated in low- vs INT-1 risk pts. The proportion of pts with comorbidities was similar across cohorts, except for fewer cardiovascular comorbidities in low- vs INT-1 risk pts. Mean TSS was lower in low- vs INT-1 risk pts, but the proportion of pts with TSS ≥20 was greater in treated vs untreated pts in both low- and INT-1 risk groups. Fatigue was the most severe pt-reported symptom in all cohorts. Differences in mean TSS and individual symptom scores between risk groups were not significant (P > 0.05), except itching was worse among INT-1 risk pts (P=0.03). Physician-reported signs and symptoms were generally more frequent for untreated vs treated pts, irrespective of risk (all P > 0.05). Most low risk (69.4%) and INT-1 risk pts (61.2%) who were currently untreated at enrollment had not received any prior MF-directed treatment (Table 1B); the most common prior treatment among currently untreated pts was hydroxyurea (HU) in both risk groups. Of currently treated pts, HU was the most common MF-directed monotherapy at enrollment in low-risk pts, and ruxolitinib was most common in INT-1 risk pts. No low risk pts and few INT-1 risk pts were currently receiving >1 MF-directed therapy at enrollment. Conclusion: These real-world data from pts with MF enrolled in MOST show that a substantial proportion of both low- and INT-1 risk pts who had received treatment before enrollment were not being treated at the time of enrollment. Although watch-and-wait is a therapeutic option, the finding that many of these lower risk pts had in fact received prior therapies suggests an unmet need for effective and tolerable second-line treatment options. Treated pts had greater pt-reported symptom burden vs untreated pts, which suggests that high symptom burden may contribute to the decision for treatment. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate symptom burden change with therapy initiation. In this regard, future analyses of data from MOST are planned to assess the longitudinal evolution of the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and management of pts with MF. Disclosures Komrokji: Geron: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Acceleron: Honoraria. Stein:Incyte: Research Funding; Kartos: Other: educational content presented; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmaessentia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scherber:Incyte Corporation: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Kalafut:Incyte: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ren:Incyte: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Verstovsek:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma Corp: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; ItalPharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Protagonist Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Carfilzomib Thalidomide and Dexamethasone Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Open Label Phase II Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) MM 018/ Asian Myeloma Network (AMN) 002 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139174 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 39-40

Author(s):

Hang Quach ◽

Simon J Harrison ◽

Je-Jung Lee ◽

Nichloas Murphy ◽

Jae Hoon Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Primary Endpoint ◽

Research Funding ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Open Label Phase ◽

Grade 3

Background: The combination of carfilzomib with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and dexamethasone is active in multiple myeloma (MM). Carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (KTd) has been studied in upfront MM treatment but has not been studied in the setting of relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM). The ALLG MM018/ AMN002 is an open-label phase II study of KTd in patients with RRMM. This study was conducted across 16 sites across Australia, New-Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Method: Patients with RRMM with 1-3 prior lines of treatment were given carfilzomib [K: 20mg/m2 IV cycle 1 days 1 and 2, 56mg/m2 (36mg/m2 for patients age ≥75 years) from cycle 1 day 8 onwards], thalidomide (T: 100mg po nocte) and dexamethasone [dex: 40mg (20mg for patients age ≥75 years) po weekly], in a 28-day cycle. After 12 cycles, T was omitted, and K was given on days 1,2,15,16 and dex days 1,15 every 28-day cycles for a further six cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were ORR, overall survival, adverse events, and quality of life (QoL). The study had an 80% power to detect a ≥70% PFS at 6.5 months compared to historical ≤50% PFS at 6.5 months expected with Td (Kropff, M. et al. Haematologica 2012), at a significance level of 0.05. Results: This study has completed accrual. Eighty-three patients [median age of 66 years (42-85)] were enrolled with a median follow up of 15.9 (0.9-26) months. ORR rates were 86.4% (≥VGPR 70.2%). Median PFS was 20m (95% CI 15.9-26m). PFS at 6.5 months was 76.2% (95% CI 73.6-84.9%). Median OS has not been reached, and was 75% at 20 months. The most common grade ≥3/4 AEs were peripheral neuropathy (16%), upper respiratory tract infections (12%), dyspnoea (14%), and hypertension (10%). Grade ≥3/4 cardiac AEs occurred in 6%. The median carfilzomib dose that was delivered was 70.7% (32.8-92.6%) of the target dose. Thus far, 41% of patients have completed the intended 18 cycles of treatment. 21% of patients ceased therapy early. The most common reason for early treatment cessation was disease progression (30%) and adverse events (15%). Fifteen patients (18%) have died, 11 were due to MM, two from infection, one from an ischaemic cardiac event, and one from a traffic accident. QoL, as measured by the EQ-5D-5L instrument, remained stable throughout treatment. Conclusion: The ALLG MM018/AMN 002 study has met its primary endpoint. The KTd schedule as outlined in this study is efficacious in patients with RRMM, resulting in a prolonged PFS and a safety profile in line with previous reports for each of carfilzomib and thalidomide. KTd is an active option in jurisdictions where the cost of other IMiDs prohibits regulatory funding. Comparisons of efficacy and adverse events between the Caucasian and Asian populations will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Quach: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Glaxo Kline Smith: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding. Harrison:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: wrt panobinostat; Haemalogix: Consultancy. Augustson:Roche: Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support. Campbell:Amgen, Novartis, Roche, Janssen, Celgene (BMS): Research Funding; AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, Amgen, CSL Behring, Novartis: Consultancy. Soo:Hanmi: Research Funding. Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Final Results of Phase 1/1b Study of Tenalisib, Dual PI3K δ/γ Inhibitor in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory T-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123954 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2831-2831 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Swaminathan P. Iyer ◽

Brad M. Haverkos ◽

Jasmine Zain ◽

Radhakrishnan Ramchandren ◽

Mary Jo Lechowicz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Advisory Committees

Introduction: Tenalisib (RP6530) is a novel, highly specific, dual PI3K δ/γ inhibitor with nano-molar inhibitory potency at the enzyme and cellular level. PI3K plays a critical role in T-cell development and activation and several studies have validated the PI3K-AKT pathway as a potential therapeutic target in T cell lymphomas. Preliminary results of the ongoing Phase 1/1b T-cell lymphoma (TCL) study demonstrated an acceptable safety profile with encouraging clinical activity in relapsed/refractory TCL (Oki, ASCO 2018 and Iyer, ASH 2018). We now present the final results of the study (NCT02567656). Methods: This study comprised of four-dose escalation cohorts, followed by two dose expansion cohorts at MTD enrolling 20 patients each in PTCL and CTCL cohorts. Patients had histologically confirmed TCL, ECOG PS ≤2, and had received ≥1 prior therapy. Patients received Tenalisib [200 mg BID-800 mg BID (fasting), 800 mg (fed only)] orally until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objectives were to determine the MTD and pharmacokinetic profile. The secondary objective was to evaluate overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response. Responses were evaluated for PTCL and CTCL based on IWG criteria (Cheson 2007) and mSWAT respectively. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAE v4.03. Results: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in study, 19 in dose escalation and 39 in dose expansion (28 PTCL and 30 CTCL). Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1-15). Safety assessment of 58 patients receiving at least one dose of Tenalisib demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. Treatment related Grade≥3 AEs were elevated ALT/AST (21%), rash (5%), and hypophosphatemia (3%). These events were reversible and managed by withholding study drug. Additionally, in few patients (N=9), steroids were used to manage elevated ALT/AST. There were six treatment related serious adverse events, none of these led to fatal outcome. At end of the study, four (3 CTCL; 1 PTCL) patients who completed minimum 8 cycles of therapy were rolled over to a compassionate use study (NCT03711604) and were followed up. Efficacy assessments demonstrated an ORR of 46% (3 CR and 13 PR) and clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD) of 77%. Subset efficacy analysis showed an ORR in PTCL of 47% (3 CR; 4 PR) and in CTCL of 45% (9 PR). The median time to initial response was 1.8 months and was similar in both sub-types. The overall median DOR was 4.91 months (range 0.9-26.6); in PTCL patients the DOR was 6.53 months, (range: 0.97-21.0) and 3.8 months (range: 1.67-25.67) in CTCL patients. In 3 PTCL patients who achieved CR, the median DOR was 19.5 months (range 7.5-21). Conclusion: Tenalisib demonstrated promising clinical activity and an improved safety profile in patients with relapsed/ refractory TCL. Currently, a phase I/II combination study to further evaluate safety and efficacy with romidepsin is ongoing in this target population. Disclosures Iyer: Arog: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Zain:Spectrum: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Korman:Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Glaxo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immune Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa: Research Funding; Leo: Research Funding; Menlo: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Principia: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Regeneron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Sun: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syntimmune: Research Funding; UCB: Research Funding; Valeant: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eli Lilly: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Dermira: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Routhu:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Barde:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Nair:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Huen:Galderma Inc: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline Inc: Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Therapeutic Response to Azacitidine (AZA) In Patients with Secondary Myelodysplastic Syndromes (sMDS) Enrolled In the AVIDA Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2931.2931 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2931-2931 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽

Mohit Narang ◽

Rami S. Komrokji ◽

Jaroslaw P Maciejewski ◽

Alan F. List ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Logistic Regression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Platelet Transfusion ◽

Statistical Tests ◽

Risk Scores ◽

Refractory Anemia ◽

Type I ◽

Odds Ratios ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 2931 Background: The incidence of sMDS is increasing due to improved survival of patients (pts) treated with chemotherapy (CT) or radiotherapy (RT) for other cancers. While studies have demonstrated hematologic improvement (HI) and survival benefits of AZA in pts with primary MDS (pMDS) (Lancet Oncol 2009;10:223), the effects of AZA in sMDS, considered rarer (5-10% of MDS diagnoses) (J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:1542) and more difficult to treat, are unknown. AVIDA, a longitudinal, US, multicenter, prospective registry of pts in community-based clinics receiving AZA, is the largest database of AZA-treated pts in the world and includes a large cohort of sMDS pts. We compared the tolerability of and response rates to AZA in sMDS vs pMDS pts in the AVIDA database. Methods: MDS pt data were collected at registry entry (baseline), and then quarterly using electronic data capture, between October, 2006 and July, 2010. Treating physicians determined AZA dose, dosing schedule, and treatment duration. Baseline characteristics of sMDS and pMDS pts were evaluated but formal statistical tests comparing cohorts were intentionally not performed to avoid Type I errors. Rates of IWG-2000-defined HI or possibly better responses (HI+) were assessed centrally and compared between sMDS and pMDS cohorts (each assessment included only pts eligible for improvement). RBC and platelet transfusion independence (TI) were also evaluated between groups using logistic regression analyses with patients stratified by International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) scores (higher [score >1] vs lower [score ≤1]) and transfusion status at baseline, with age and months since diagnosis included as covariates. Odds ratios (sMDS to pMDS) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported from these models. Results: At data cut-off in July 2010, 37/417 pts (8.9%) in the registry had sMDS associated with exposure to RT, CT, or radioiodine (n=33), benzene (n=2), or radiation (n=2). Median times since diagnosis for pts with sMDS and pMDS were 1 month (range 0 – 69) and 3 months (0 – 207), and median ages were 71 years (range 41 – 86) and 75 years (29 – 91), respectively. At baseline, for pts with available IPSS scores, a larger proportion of pts with sMDS than pts with pMDS had IPSS higher-risk scores (55% vs 30%) and IPSS poor cytogenetics (59% vs 17%). Additionally, a higher proportion of sMDS vs pMDS pts had chromosome 7 abnormalities (47% vs 11%), 2–3 cytopenias (76% vs 62%), and infections requiring IV antibiotics (41% vs 16%); but similar proportions had >10% blasts (18% of both cohorts) and were dependent on RBC (57% vs 52%) and platelet (22% vs 13%) transfusions at baseline. Median follow-up was 5.9 months (range 0.2 – 24) in the sMDS and 6.7 months (0.1 – 37) in the pMDS cohorts, and median numbers of AZA treatment cycles were 4 (range 1 – 21) and 5 (1 – 26), respectively. In both the sMDS and pMDS groups, the most common treatment dose and schedules were 75 mg/m2 AZA (91% and 83%, respectively) for 5 consecutive days (46% and 55%) in ≤28-day cycles (45% and 54%). Pts with sMDS had a high rate of HI+, which was comparable to that in pts with pMDS (Table). Rates of RBC TI in baseline RBC transfusion-dependent pts with sMDS vs pMDS were 57% vs 61%, and of platelet TI for baseline platelet transfusion-dependent sMDS vs pMDS pts were 50% vs 64% (Table). Odds ratios from the logistic regression models were 1.4 (95%CI: 0.6, 3.5; p=0.47) and 0.6 (95%CI: 0.2, 1.4; p=0.23) for RBC TI and platelet TI, respectively, after adjusting for the other covariates in the model. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were similar in the 2 groups, with the exception of higher frequencies of thrombocytopenia (27% vs 11%) and infections (24% vs. 12%) in sMDS vs pMDS pts, respectively. Conclusion: Pts with sMDS treated with AZA had rates of HI or better responses comparable to those of pMDS patients, despite worse pretreatment disease characteristics. AZA was well tolerated by pts with sMDS and pMDS. A diagnosis of sMDS alone should not preclude treatment with the disease-modifying drug, azacitidine. Disclosures: Sekeres: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Azacitidine is approved in the US for treatment of patients with the FAB myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) subtypes: Refractory anemia (RA) or refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts (RARS) (if accompanied by neutropenia or thrombocytopenia or requiring transfusions), refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB), refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEB-T), and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML); and is approved in the EU for IPSS Int-2 and High risk MDS, CMML with 10–29 percent marrow blasts without myeloproliferative disorder, and AML with 20–30% blasts and multi-lineage dysplasia, according to WHO classification. This abstract describes azacitidine use in secondary MDS. Komrokji:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Maciejewski:Celgene: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy. List:Celgene: Research Funding. Street:Celgene: Employment. Swern:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Sullivan:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Grinblatt:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text