scholarly journals Detection of Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Gene Clonality By High-Throughput Sequencing for Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1747-1747
Author(s):  
Alicia Serrano ◽  
Azahara Fuentes ◽  
Blanca Ferrer Lores ◽  
Veronica Lendinez ◽  
Carolina Monzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukaemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Data Summarization ◽  
Bioinformatic Pipeline ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Final Data ◽  
Minimal Residual

Introduction: The negative minimal residual disease (MRD) after treatment has been recently accepted as endpoint for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL) clinical trials. Conventionally, MRD can be detected by using multi-color Flow Cytometry (FC) with high sensitivity. Determination of the clonal immunoglobulin gene rearrangement can be a useful monitoring marker in a broad range of B-cell lymphoproliferative neoplasms. Moreover, the mutational status of immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IgHV) rearrangement is considered one of the most important prognostic factors in CLL. Therefore, the identification of the IgHV rearrangement can be a useful marker both at diagnostic and as monitoring marker for MRD. Nowadays, high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies has enabled highly sensitive cancer genomic testing in clinical laboratories. There are same initiatives based on HTS to use IgHV rearrangement as marker for MRD monitoring in Acute lymphoblastic leukemia or multiple myeloma, but it remains unharmonized for application on CLL in the clinical laboratory. Objective: We evaluated the performance and clinical applicability of HTS assay for IgHV rearrangement in CLL MRD monitoring in 69 samples from 19 CLL patients treated. Methods: The libraries including IGH locus were performed using the Sequencing Multiplex Kit on IGH consensus primers. To simplify and make automatic the analysis of the data obtained, we developed a specific bioinformatic pipeline that covers from preprocessing to final data summarization and interpretation. The backbone of the analysis includes read preprocessing, mapping against IMGT reference sequences, consensus IgHV reads pairwise alignment to determine mutational status and read classification into rearrangements. Assessment of IgHV mutational status by Sseq, genomic DNA (gDNA; 50-100 ng), were used for IgHV analysis. gDNA was amplified using locus-specific primer sets for IgHV designed to allow for the amplification of all known alleles of the germline IgH sequence, as described previously. Inmunophenotypic studies were performed on erythrocyte-lysed whole PB samples according to Euroflow procedures. PB white blood cells (WBC) was systematically stained with the eight color combination panel recently proposed by the ERIC group for MRD detection (Rawstron AC et al. 2016). Data acquisition was performed on a FACSCanto II flow cytometer Becton-Dickinson Biociences using the FACSDiva software (V8.0; BD). For data analysis, the Infinicyt softwareTM (Cytognos SL, Salamanca, Spain) was used. The MRD levels were reported as fraction of CLL cells of all nucleated cells. MRD negativity was define as a fraction <10 -4 However, for treatments that preferentially clear the blood (for example monoclonal antibodies) the MRD was confirm in the bone marrow as has been recommended. Results: Patient demographics and the results of IGH clonality tests are summarized in Table 1. Interpretable results were obtained with higher sensitivity compared with Sseq at diagnosis stage (19/19 samples), and we are able to determine the same clone at subsequent samples. Among 50 follow-up samples, 44 MRD were positive in both techniques (HTS and FC); 3 follow-up samples, were negative in both determinations (HTS and FC); in contrast, 3 follow-up samples, were negative by FC but positive by HTS (8.3, 17.2, 18.2 samples). This is the case of Patient 8, in which the last follow-up sample, the detection of the primary clone is positive by HTS, while by FC is undetected (Figure 1). In addition, it was possible to detect IgHV clone in all Patient 7 samples. It was under long-term monitoring by HTS and FC, and 17 months after initial diagnosis and first line of treatment (7.5 sample), it was detected a loss of response (Figure 2.). Conclusions: We evaluated an HTS IgHV assay using initial and follow-up samples of 19 CLL patients. Using our pre-designed primer set in library preparation, and developed our specific bioinformatic pipeline that covers from preprocessing to final data summarization and interpretation, we were able to demonstrate that our method was more sensitive than FC in detecting positive follow-up samples and could be able to propose it for MRD monitoring in CLL. However, the prognostic impact of these low-level MRD detected by HTS should be validated with further investigations. Samples were provided by the INCLIVA Biobank. Funded by Gilead Felowship 257/17 Disclosures Ortiz: GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding. Terol:Abbvie: Consultancy; Gilead: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy.

Switching to Nilotinib Is Associated with Continued Deeper Molecular Responses in CML-CP Patients with Minimal Residual Disease After ≥ 2 Years On Imatinib: Enestcmr 2-Year Follow-up Results

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 694-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
Jeffrey H. Lipton ◽  
Nelson Spector ◽  
Brian Leber ◽  
Ricardo Pasquini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 694 Background: Superior rates of deeper molecular responses were achieved with nilotinib vs imatinib in patients newly diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) in the Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials—newly diagnosed patients (ENESTnd) trial. In addition, the 12-month (mo) analysis of the ENEST—complete molecular response (ENESTcmr) study demonstrated that switching to nilotinib after a minimum of 2 years on imatinib led to increased rates of major molecular response (MMR) and deeper molecular responses vs remaining on imatinib. Results from ENESTcmr are presented here with minimum 24 mo of patient follow-up. Methods: Patients with Ph+ CML-CP who had achieved complete cytogenetic responses but still had persistent BCR-ABL positivity by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) after ≥ 2 years on imatinib were eligible. Patients (n = 207) were randomized to switch to nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (BID; n = 104) or to continue on the same dose of imatinib (400 or 600 mg once daily [QD]; n = 103). Rates of MMR, MR4 (BCR-ABL ≤ 0.01% according to the International Scale [IS], corresponding to a 4-log reduction), MR4.5 (BCR-ABL ≤ 0.0032%IS, corresponding to 4.5-log reduction), and undetectable BCR-ABL via RQ-PCR with ≥ 4.5-log sensitivity were measured. Results: Among all randomized patients (intent-to-treat population), significantly more patients treated with nilotinib continued to achieve undetectable BCR-ABL by 24 mo (32.7% on nilotinib vs 16.5% on imatinib; P =.005; Table).The difference between the arms in achievement of this endpoint increased between 1 and 2 years (from 12.4% to 16.2%). The median time to MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL was also significantly faster on nilotinib than on imatinib (P = .005 and .003, respectively). Cumulative rates of MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL continued to be higher with nilotinib in patients without those responses at baseline, and the difference between arms appeared to increase over time. The safety profiles for nilotinib and imatinib were consistent with prior studies. By 24 mo, no patients in either arm progressed to accelerated phase/blast crisis. No patients on nilotinib died since the 12-mo analysis; 1 patient on imatinib died from metastatic prostate cancer in follow-up after discontinuation from the study. Conclusions: Switching to nilotinib led to significantly faster, deeper molecular responses in patients with minimal residual disease on long-term imatinib therapy. Since the 12-mo analysis, rates of deep molecular response (MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL) have remained significantly higher in patients who did not have the response at baseline and were switched to nilotinib (vs those remaining on imatinib). In fact, the difference in favor of nilotinib increased between 1 and 2 years. These results suggest that switching to the more potent, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib is beneficial in patients with minimal residual disease after long-term imatinib therapy. Achievement of these deeper molecular responses (MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL) after switching to nilotinib may enable a greater proportion of CML-CP patients to be eligible for future discontinuation studies. Cumulative rates of confirmed undetectable BCR-ABL by 24 mo will be presented as the confirmation assessments for several responders were not available at the time of this analysis. Disclosures: Hughes: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; CSL: Research Funding. Lipton:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Spector:Novarits: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Leber:Novartis: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Schwarer:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Etienne:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Branford:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Purkayastha:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Collins:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Szczudlo:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Cervantes:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

WT1 Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3695-3695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Malagola ◽  
Crisitina Skert ◽  
Enrico Morello ◽  
Francesca Antoniazzi ◽  
Erika Borlenghi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Although a complete remission (CR) can be achieved in 70-80% of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, relapses occur in up to the 50% of cases. Thus, minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring is a major issue for early detection of patients at high-risk of treatment failure and relapse. Aim: to dynamically evaluate WT1 pan-leukemic molecular marker of MRD in patients with AML. Matherial and methods: 107 newly diagnosed AML patients consecutively treated between 2010 and 2013 were monitored with quantitative WT-1 from bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) at baseline, after induction, after the first consolidation course, before allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), at the 3rd and the 6th month after transplantation Results: At diagnosis, 104/107 (97%) had increased PB and BM WT1 levels assessed according to the ELN assay. Eighty-eight out of 107 patients (82%) achieved a complete remission (CR) after induction, 30/88 (34%) relapsed during follow up and 24/107 (22%) were addressed to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). By univariate analysis, PB-WT > 50x10^4/ABL and BM-WT1 > 250x10^4/ABL after induction (PB: p=0.02; BM: p=0.04), after consolidation (PB: p=0.003), at the end of treatment (PB and BM: p=0.001), at 3rd month of follow up (PB and BM: p=0.005) and at 6th month of follow up (PB: p=0.005) were associated with a reduced overall survival (OS). By multivariate analysis, a BM-WT1 > 250 x 10^4/ABL at the end of treatment was significantly associated with a reduced OS. In order to adapt the cut-off of WT1 in our series of patients, we considered WT1 levels as continuous variables and categorized them at approximately the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile. A cut-off of PB-WT1 > 25x10^4/ABL and BM-WT1 > 125x10^4/ABL at the end of the treatment program was identified as correlated with reduced leukemia-free survival (LFS) and OS (p=0.001). Similarly, and restricting the analysis on the 24 patients allo-transplanted in CR, 8/11 (73%) with pre-transplant PB-WT1 ≥ 5 and 4/13 (31%) with PB-WT1 < 5 relapsed, respectively (p=0.04). The incidence of relapse was higher in AML patients with PB-WT1 ≥ 5 measured at 3rd (56% vs 38%; p=0.43) and 6th month (71% vs 20%; p=0.03) after allo-SCT. Interestingly, 5/5 (100%) patients with pre-transplant PB-WT1 ≥ 5 who never reduced this level at 3rd or 6th month after allo-SCT experienced a disease recurrence. Conclusions: our data, although retrospectively collected, show that WT1 monitoring may be useful to predict the relapse in AML patients. Acknowledgments: This work was supported in part by Banca di Credito Cooperativo di Pompiano e Franciacorta and Lions Club Bassa Bresciana Association. Disclosures Russo: Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Myeloma: Independent Outcome Prediction and Sequential Survival Benefits per Log Tumour Reduction

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3416-3416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy C Rawstron ◽  
Walter Gregory ◽  
Ruth M de Tute ◽  
Faith E Davies ◽  
Susan E Bell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Outcome Prediction ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Surrogate Endpoint ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Minimal residual disease (MRD), as assessed by flow cytometry is a powerful predictor of outcome in multiple myeloma (MM). We and others have previously demonstrated that such analyses are informative in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and non-transplant regimens. It predicts outcome in patients in conventional CR and is applicable to patients with standard and adverse risk cytogenetics. As a consequence MRD assessment is under consideration as a surrogate endpoint for clinical trials. This is urgently needed in MM as >5yrs follow-up is typically required to demonstrate survival differences in trials of upfront therapy. If surrogate end points are to be used in clinical trials it is essential that a reproducible effect is demonstrable using multivariate models. Previous studies have confirmed the effect of MRD on PFS but a consistent effect on OS has been not been definitively shown. This may in part be due to the availability of effective salvage therapy but it is also possible that the traditional threshold of 10-4 for analysis and the categorization of patients as MRD-postive or negative is suboptimal. Flow cytometry does provide a quantitative assessment of residual tumour over a large range and the degree of tumour depletion may be more informative than a positive-negative analysis. 397 patients from the MRC Myeloma IX trial were included in this analysis. Patients were randomly assigned to CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone) or CVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) induction for 4-6 cycles followed by standard high-dose melphalan (HDM) ASCT. BM aspirates were obtained at day 100 for MRD analysis. 500,000 cells were evaluated with six-colour antibody combinations including CD138/CD38/CD45/CD19 with CD56/CD27 in all cases and CD81/CD117 in additional cases as required. PFS and OS data analysis was landmarked from the date of the MRD assesment. Of the 397 patients with MRD data available at day 100 after ASCT, 247/397 (62.2%) achieved <0.01% MRD. The level of residual disease varied across four logs in MRD-positive patients (0.01-<0.1% in 49/397, 0.1-<1% in 72/397, 1-<10% in 26/397 and ≥10% in 3/397). The PFS and OS for individuals with ≥1% residual disease was comparable to individuals with a PR/MR/SD confirming that MRD assessment is most relevant in CR. The level of MRD correlated with outcome. The median PFS for patients with ≥10% MRD at day 100 after ASCT was 0.8 years, with 1-<10% MRD was 1.7 years, with 0.1-<1% MRD was 1.9 years, with 0.01-<0.1% MRD was 2.7 years and for patients with <0.01% MRD was 3.1 years (P<0.001). The median OS for these groups was 1 yr, 4 yrs, 5.9 yrs, 6.8 yrs and for patients with <0.01% MRD not reached with >7.5 yrs median follow-up (P<0.001, see figure). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to further evaluate factors influencing outcome. B2M and MRD were log-transformed and along with age were considered as continuous variables. ISS, haemoglobin (<115g/l), platelets (<150x10^9/l) and cytogenetics were used as stratification factors. Cytogenetic groups were classified as unfavourable for patients with gain(1q), del(1p32), t(4;14), t(14;20), t(14;16), and del(17p), or favourable for hyperdiploidy, t(11;14) and t(6;14), or unknown/inevaluable. MRD assessment (χ2 11.8, P=0.0006) and cytogenetics (χ2 35.5, P=<0.0001) were the only factors that retained significance in this multivariate model. Conventional categorical response, ISS and B2M were not predictive of OS (p=0.99, 0.16 and 0.56 respectively). We would conclude that MRD quantitation is more informative than a positive or negative categorization with a 10-4 threshold and independently predicts outcome. In this analysis we were able to demonstrate an approximate 1 year survival benefit per log tumour depletion. A lower cutpoint for predicting improved outcome was not reached and more sensitive assays will likely improve outcome prediction further. This data strongly supports the role of MRD assessment as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Rawstron: Celgene: Consultancy; BD Biosciences: Consultancy, Intrasure Patents & Royalties. Gregory:Celgene: Consultancy. Davies:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy. Cook:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jackson:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Morgan:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Owen:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Molecular Monitoring and Tailored Strategy with Pre-Emptive Rituximab Treatment for Molecular Relapse; Results from the Nordic Mantle Cell Lymphoma Studies (MCL2 and MCL3) with Median Follow-up of 8.5 Years

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 146-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arne Kolstad ◽  
Lone B Pedersen ◽  
Christian Winther Eskelund ◽  
Simon Husby ◽  
Kirsten Grønbæk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Clinical Relapse ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Background: Minimal residual disease monitoring has been shown to be of relevance in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) to evaluate quality of remission and predict clinical relapse. The main objectives of the present study were to determine the value of minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring to guide pre-emptive treatment with rituximab, and to predict clinical relapse in MCL following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in two prospective trials (MCL2 and MCL3) with long-term follow-up conducted by the Nordic Lymphoma Group. Methods: Patients treated in the two studies received a total of 6 alternating cycles with R-CHOP and R-Ara-C followed by a peripheral blood stem cell harvest and high-dose therapy with ASCT. Additionally, responding patients not in CR before ASCT in the MCL3 trial received yttium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan (0.4 mCi/kg) as intensification one week prior to the standard conditioning with BEAM/C. Staging included physical examination, blood tests, computed tomography (CT) scans and bone marrow (BM) aspiration and biopsy. Clinical and molecular response evaluation was repeated 2-3 months and 6 months after transplant, and then every 6 months until relapse or 5 years follow-up. A combined standard nested and quantitative real-time PCR assay was used to estimate MRD involvement in consecutive post-transplant BM/PB samples. Molecular relapse after ASCT was defined as; 1. Conversion from standard nested PCR negative to standard nested PCR positive, or 2. For patients who were MRD positive post-ASCT, a significant (>5 fold) increase of the real time quantitative PCR detectable MRD level in two consecutive BM samples. Patients in clinical remission who developed a molecular relapse in both studies received 4 weekly doses of rituximab (375 mg/m2). This treatment could be repeated in case of recurrent molecular relapses. Results: An MRD marker for Bcl-1 or IgH rearrangement was obtained for 94 out of 160 patients (59%) recruited in the Nordic MCL2 trial, and for 121 out of 160 (76%) in the consecutive MCL3 trial. 183 patients, who had completed induction therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the two studies and where a PCR marker in blood or bone marrow was obtained, were included in the current analysis. Median follow-up from inclusion was 8.5 years among survivors. Patients who were MRD negative post-ASCT had significantly longer relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those who were MRD positive (P<0.001). Eighty-six patients remained in continuous molecular remission. Of those, 73% also remained in clinical remission after 10 years. For all patients, median time from ASCT to molecular relapse was 55 months and with no signs of a plateau on the curve (Figure 1). Fifty-eight patients with MRD relapse received pre-emptive treatment with 4 weekly doses of rituximab (375 mg/m2) on one or more occasions. Conversion back to MRD negative state was achieved in the majority (82%) of cases after rituximab treatment. Median time from molecular relapse to clinical relapse in patients who received pre-emptive rituximab was 55 months (Figure 2). In a multivariate analysis, significant predictors for molecular relapse were MIPI high risk category at diagnosis (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.37-2.66, P=0,0001) and detection of MRD prior to ASCT (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.49-4.09, P=0.0005). Late MRD relapses continued to occur 5-10 years after ASCT even in lower risk groups. Conclusion: We observed a continuous pattern of MRD relapses that did not subside even after 5-10 years and included all risk groups. Hence, it is fair to consider MCL as a chronic incurable lymphoma entity and novel approaches will be necessary to change the natural course of this disease. Detection of MRD was shown to be a predictor for clinical relapse and inferior survival. Additionally, the data strongly suggests that pre-emptive rituximab treatment delayed clinical relapse in MCL. We recommend MRD monitoring post-ASCT in MCL as a useful approach to select the MRD positive patients for novel strategies in future trials and as an alternative to maintenance therapy for all patients. The MCL2 and MCL3 trials were registered at www.isrctn.com as ISRCTN 87866680 and at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NTC 00514475, respectively. Disclosures Kolstad: Nordic Nanovector: Other: Membership of Scientific Advisory Board. Jerkeman:Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Geisler:Roche: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy.

Sustained High Rates of Complete Response and Minimal Residual Disease Negativity after 8 Cycles of Carfilzomib (CFZ), Lenalidomide (LEN), and Dexamethasone (DEX) Followed By 2 Years of Lenalidomide Maintenance (CRd-R) in Patients with High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: Updated Results of Clinical and Correlative Phase 2 Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3339-3339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dickran Kazandjian ◽  
Neha S Korde ◽  
Mark Roschewski ◽  
Sham Mailankody ◽  
Candis Morrison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Risk Of Progression ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Background: High-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (HR-SMM) is a plasma cell dyscrasia which has a 5-year risk of progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) of approximately 75% based on current risk models. With the availability of novel therapies, early treatment may decrease the risk of progression and prolong survival as evidenced by the recent QuiRedex study results. More recently, studies have demonstrated that triplet regimens are superior to doublet in MM and whole exome sequencing in HR-SMM is indicative of treatment susceptible biology in early disease; supporting the use of effective combination therapy as early intervention. Expanding on our initial results using modern CRd-R therapy in HR-SMM patients (Korde et al. JAMA Onc 2015) we show unprecedented high rates of obtained and sustained complete response (CR) and minimal residual disease negativity (MRDneg CR) in an expanded cohort of patients with a median follow-up of ~3 years. Methods: Treatment-na•ve patients with HR-SMM (IMWG 2010 criteria; Mayo or PETHEMA models) were treated for 8 cycles (28-day cycles) with CFZ 20/36 mg/m2 IV days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16; LEN 25 mg PO days 1-21, and DEX 20/10 mg IV/PO days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, 23. Transplant eligible patients underwent stem cell collection after ≥4 cycles of CRd and then continued CRd treatment (i.e. by-default-delayed high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplant; HDM-ASCT). After 8 cycles of combination therapy, patients with SD or better received 2 years of LEN 10 mg PO maintenance. The primary objective was best response (ORR), followed by secondary objectives of progression free survival (PFS) and response duration (DoR) which were assessed after every cycle of induction and every 90 days during maintenance. Correlative studies including assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) by multi-color flow cytometry (bone marrow aspirate; 10-5 sensitivity) as defined by updated 2016 IMWG response criteria were performed after 8 cycles of induction and 1 and 2 years of maintenance LEN. Results: Eighteen patients meeting eligibility criteria were enrolled (data-lock 7/20/2016). Demographics and disease characteristics are shown in Table 1. Best ORR and >= VGPR rate (n=18) with CRd-R was 100% (Table 2). The proportion of patients who obtained stringent CR/CR after 8 cycles of induction, 1 year of maintenance and 2 years of maintenance was 61%, 89%, and 89%, respectively. Of evaluable patients who achieved at least a CR, the proportion of patients who obtained MRD negativity (MRDneg CR) at the same time-points was 91%, 71%, and 75%, respectively. DoR and PFS at 36 months was 94% and overall survival with a median follow-up duration of 31 months was 100%. Toxicities Grade 3-4 occurring in >1 patient included lymphopenia (39%), neutropenia (28%), anemia (22%), diarrhea (17%), lung infection (17%), hypophosphatemia (11%), and thromboembolic event (11%). Significant serious adverse events included CHF which occurred in one patient. Conclusions: Early treatment of HR-SMM with modern CRd-R combination therapy with by-default-delayed HDM-ASCT resulted in unprecedented high rates of CR and MRDneg CR after 8 cycles of CRd. Following 2 years of additional LEN maintenance therapy, the CR and sustained MRDneg CR rates were 89% and 69%, respectively. Given the significant risk of progression to symptomatic MM and associated life limiting end-organ damage, early intervention for patients with HR-SMM with effective triplet-based therapies may be warranted. This first proof-of-principle study has thus far demonstrated exceptional clinical benefit. Therefore, this study will be re-opened to enrollment and long-term follow up results collected to expand on these promising results. Updated results will be presented at the Annual Meeting. Disclosures Korde: Medscape: Honoraria. Bhutani:Prothena: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Onyx, an Amgen subsidiary: Speakers Bureau. Landgren:BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria.

Achievement of Minimal Residual Disease Negativity By Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Is an Important Therapeutic Endpoint in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Receiving Salvage Treatment

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2916-2916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Short ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Jeffrey L. Jorgensen ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Musa Yilmaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Background: Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) is prognostic for survival in newly diagnosed patients (pts) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The significance of achieving MRD negativity in the relapsed/refractory setting is less clear. Methods: Between 6/2010 and 5/2015, we identified 130 adult pts with relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL treated at our institution with either inotuzumab ozogamicin (n=75), blinatumomab (n=20) or mini-hyper-CVD plus inotuzumab ozogamicin (HCVD+InO; n=35) in either salvage 1 (S1; n=68) or salvage 2 (S2; n=62). MRD by MFC was assessed on remission bone marrow specimens at the time of achievement of CR/CRp/CRi. The MRD assay used a 15-marker, 6-color panel with a sensitivity of ≤0.01%. Results: Of the initial 130 pts, 78 (60%) achieved morphological response with a median time to response of 30 days (range, 13-99 days) and are the subject of this analysis. Of the 78 responding pts, 41 (53%) received inotuzumab, 11 (14%) blinatumomab, and 26 (33%) HCVD+ino. 46 pts (59%) were in S1 and 32 (41%) in S2. The median number of cycles to best response was 1 (range, 1-3). MRD negativity was achieved in 41 pts (53%). MRD negativity rates for pts in CR, CRp, and CRi were 57%, 53%, and 16%, respectively. Among pts who achieved remission, MRD negativity was achieved in 17 pts (41%) with inotuzumab, 8 (73%) with blinatumomab, and 16 (62%) with HCVD+InO (P=0.10). 26 pts (57%) in S1 and 15 (47%) in S2 became MRD-negative (P=0.40). The median follow-up duration was 27 months (range, 6-55 months). The median event-free survival (EFS) was 12 months in pts who achieved MRD negativity vs. 6 months in those who remained MRD-positive (P=0.09). The median overall survival (OS) was 17 months versus 9 months, respectively (P=0.18). Among pts in S1, achieving MRD negativity was associated with a longer EFS (median 18 months versus 7 months; 2-year EFS rate 46% versus 17%; P=0.06; Figure 1A) and OS (median 27 months versus 9 months; 2-year OS 52% versus 36%; P=0.15; Figure 1B). EFS and OS were similar in S2 regardless of MRD response. As expected, among pts who achieved MRD negativity, those in S1 had longer EFS (median 18 months vs. 5 months; P=0.001) and OS (median 27 months vs. 7 months; P=0.01) compared to those in S2. In contrast, for pts who remained MRD-positive, EFS and OS were similar regardless of salvage status (P=0.41 and P=0.39, respectively). In a 2-month landmark analysis of 64 pts, survival >2 years was observed in all groups of pts regardless of salvage treatment, salvage status or MRD status. 42 (66%) of the pts in this analysis underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). EFS and OS did not significantly differ between pts who did or did not undergo alloSCT, although a clear trend for improved long-term survival with alloSCT was observed. Among pts who achieved MRD negativity, the median EFS was 17 months and 12 months, and 2-year EFS rates were 46% and 28% for pts who underwent alloSCT vs. those who did not (P=0.24). The median OS was 24 months and 23 months, and 2-year OS rates were 55% and 46%, respectively (P=0.41). Pts who achieved MRD negativity after S1 treatment and then underwent alloSCT had the best outcomes. Of the 22 pts who achieved MRD negativity after S1 treatment, the median EFS for pts who underwent alloSCT (n=14) compared to those who did not (n=8) was not reached vs. 18 months, and the median OS was not reached vs. 27 months, respectively (P=0.28 for both). Among the 14 pts who achieved MRD negativity after S1 treatment and subsequently underwent alloSCT, 10 (71%) are still alive with a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 5-55 months). Conclusions: In patients with relapsed/refractory ALL, achievement of MRD negativity is associated with improved outcomes. Patients with relapsed/refractory ALL who achieve MRD negativity in S1 can achieve excellent long-term survival, especially if alloSCT is performed. Disclosures O'Brien: Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cortes:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding. DiNardo:Daiichi Sankyo: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Agios: Other: advisory board, Research Funding. Jain:Genentech: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novimmune: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Konopleva:Cellectis: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding. Jabbour:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy.

scholarly journals High Rates of Undetectable Minimal Residual Disease Remissions with Time-Limited Bendamustine, Rituximab, and Venetoclax (BR-VR) in Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1555-1555
Author(s):  
Andrew H. Lipsky ◽  
Brian T. Hill ◽  
Allison M. Winter ◽  
Joseph G. Jurcic ◽  
Mark L. Heaney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Tumor Lysis Syndrome ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Oncology Research ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Background: Despite the efficacy of venetoclax (VEN) in frontline CLL, optimal combination regimens and duration of treatment remain unclear. We hypothesized that cytoreduction with bendamustine/rituximab (BR) induction followed by venetoclax/rituximab (VR) consolidation for a fixed 1-year duration would be associated with an increased rate of undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) compared to historical controls and a reduction in the risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). Here we report data from an ongoing phase 2 multicenter, US, single-arm, open-label study (NCT03609593) designed to assess the safety and efficacy of BR-VR in previously untreated CLL patients (pts). Methods: Previously untreated CLL/SLL pts ≥ 18 years requiring therapy per iwCLL criteria initially received 3 cycles of bendamustine 50-90 mg/m 2 daily for 2 days and rituximab 375 mg/m 2 every 28 days for 3 cycles. Following BR, VEN was initiated with a standard dose escalation from 20 mg to 400 mg daily over 5 weeks. This was followed by 6 cycles of VR with rituximab given monthly and 5 cycles of VEN alone (12 cycles of VEN in total). Additional eligibility included: ECOG PS ≤ 2, hemoglobin ≥8g/dL, ANC ≥1000/mm 3, and platelets ≥50,000/mm 3. Response was assessed by 2018 iwCLL criteria with uMRD testing by central flow cytometry at a level of &lt;10 -4 in peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included uMRD rate, time to uMRD, and adverse events (AEs) assessed by CTCAE v 5.0. Results: As of data cutoff on 30 May 2021, 26 pts were accrued with additional recruitment ongoing. Baseline demographics were as follows: male/female (16/10), median age 60 yrs (range 44-77). Baseline prognostic studies showed unmutated IGHV in 16 (62%) pts, TP53 aberrant (either del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation) in 1 (4%) pt, del(11q) in 3 (12%) pts, and complex karyotype in 4 (15%) pts. TLS risk among 24 evaluable pts at baseline was high (H) in 3 (12.5%), medium (M) in 15 (62.5%), and low (L) in 6 (25%). At a median follow-up of 12.9 mo. (range, 1.9-27.5), 23 pts remain on study. Of 12 pts with at least 15 mo. follow-up (completing all therapy), the ORR was 100% (92% CR/CRi, 8% PR [due to small residual nodes]). 3 pts died on study (2 due to COVID-19 and 1 developed newly metastatic squamous cell carcinoma and taken off study after achieving a CR post-VEN ramp-up). Bendamustine was administered at doses of 50 mg/m 2 in 47%, 70 mg/m 2 in 11%, and 90mg/m 2 in 42% of pts. In 20 evaluable pts, response assessments after cytoreduction with BR demonstrated 15% of pts achieved CR/CRi and 85% achieved PR. For evaluable pts at 16 mo., uMRD (&lt;0.01%) in the PB and BM was observed in 100% (10/10) and 90% (9/10) of pts, respectively. MRD was intermediate (0.01% - &lt;1.0%) in 10% (1 patient) in BM (Figure 1 ORR and MRD). Median time to uMRD was 12 mo. (range 3-15) in PB and 14 mo. (range 5.5-15) in BM. The most common treatment-emergent AEs during BR induction were (any grade/grade ≥3) anemia in 6/2 (21%/7%) pts, nausea in 6/0 (21%/0%), neutropenia in 5/2 (18%/7%), rash in 5/0 (18%/0%), constipation 4/0 (14%/0%), and transaminitis in 3/0 (11%/0%). 2 pts (7%) developed febrile neutropenia during BR. Emergent AEs during VEN treatment included diarrhea in 10/0 (36%/0%) pts, neutropenia in 6/3 (21%/11%), leukopenia in 5/2 (18%/7%), and nausea in 4/0 (14%/0%). TLS risk was substantially reduced after BR lead-in. Of 3 H-risk pts at baseline, none remained H-risk after BR; of 15 M-risk pts, only 1 remained M-risk, with the remainder at L-risk (94% reduction in H- or M- risk TLS). Conclusions: BR-VR is a safe and well-tolerated regimen in untreated CLL pts. BR debulking substantially reduces TLS risk, and this sequential strategy achieves high rates of PB and BM uMRD across all prognostic risk groups. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Hill: Celgene (BMS): Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZenica: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gentenech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte/Morphysis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Jurcic: AbbVie, BMS/Celgene, Novartis: Consultancy; AbbVie, Arog Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, BMS/Celgene, Forma Therapeutics, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, PTC Therapeutics, Syros Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Heaney: CTI: Honoraria, Research Funding; Blueprint: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Sierra Oncology: Research Funding; Cogent: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Kartos: Research Funding. Lamanna: MingSight Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Oncternal Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Verastem Oncology: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics, Inc: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Venetoclax, Bendamustine, and Rituximab are all FDA approved for use in first-line CLL. The combination of these three agents and dosing schedule utilized in this clinical trial is novel and therefore technically reflects an off-label use.

scholarly journals Ighv Mutational Status By Deep Next Generation Sequencing Refines Ighv Sanger Sequencing Classification in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3028-3028
Author(s):  
Azahara Fuentes ◽  
Alicia Serrano ◽  
Blanca Ferrer Lores ◽  
Veronica Lendinez ◽  
Carolina Monzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia ◽  
High Throughput ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Sanger Sequencing ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing ◽  
Magnetic Beads ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukaemia ◽  
Standard Technique ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Major Clone

Introduction: Determination of the mutational status of rearranged immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IgHV) genes in patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL), is considered one of the most important prognostic factors: patients with unmutated IgHV (UM; ≥98% of identity to the germline) genes have a more aggressive disease course and develop more frequently unfavourable genetic deletions or mutations than patients with mutated IgHV (M; ≤98%). Mutational status, is currently determined by Sanger sequencing (Sseq) that allows the analysis of the major clone, however, international guidelines recommend caution in assigning mutational status in cases with "Borderline" IgHV identity (97-97.9%), and cases with double rearrangements with discordant mutational status. Objective: Analyze and determine the mutational status of the IgHV locus by High-throughput sequencing (HTS), in a cohort of CLL patients (n=51) with unclassifiable Sseq results: borderline status (n=22); double rearrangements (n=27) with discordant mutational status (n=2). Methods: We included 51 DNA samples extracted from peripheral blood of patients diagnosed of CLL according to the National Cancer Institute Working Group guidelines in our institution between 1986 and 2019 (median absolute lymphocytes 11.4x109/L [2,8-239,5x109/L]). Sseq amplification and analysis of IgHV rearrangements were performed on DNA conforming to the updated ERIC recommendations. In all the cases we were able to determinate the IGVH identity. To switch high-throughput sequencing to the clinical practice, we assessed the reliability of different library preparation methods to sequence IGH locus in patients with CLL. Amplification was performed using the Sequencing Multiplex Kit based on IGH FR (forward primers) and consensus JH (reverse primer) multiplex. PCR products were purified using Magsi-NGS Prep magnetic beads (Magnamedics Diagnostics), normalized and pooled to create a library for sequencing using a MiSeq equipment. To simplify and make automatic the analysis of the same we developed a specific bioinformatic pipeline that covers from preprocessing to final data summarization and interpretation. The backbone of the analysis includes read preprocessing, mapping against IMGT reference sequences, consensus IgHV reads pairwise alignment to determine mutational status and read classification into rearrangements. Results: This approach led to the identification of a dominant clone IgHV in all cases (n=51). Instead, the percentage of identity calculated by HTS analysis varies in: - 15/22 borderline cases whose mutational status could be recalculated into 10 MM and 5 UM. The rest 7 remaining in borderline group. - We could identify both clones in 29 double rearrangements cases, with concordant mutational status except 2/29 undetermined cases, included in UM group regarding HTS results. Our tool led to the identification of a dominant clonotypic IgHV in all cases, and when compared the HTS sequence/mutational status for the most abundant clone with Sseq and for the IgHV status determination, 15 out of 22 (68,18%), could be reclassified. This case showed a major clone with productive rearrangement mutated by Sseq but unmutated by HTS. Conclusions: Analyze and determine the mutational status of the IgHV locus by HTS, would potentially reveal multiple rearrangements and increase the prognostic precision of IgHV mutation analysis. IgHV-HTS classification is able to precisely classify patients with borderline status or/and multiple IgHV rearrangements for which Sseq is inconclusive. In this case, it has been possible to improved prognostication for 17 out of 24 patients. This is helping us to discover the advantages of the data obtained by HTS compared with current Sseq standard technique. Samples were provided by the INCLIVA Biobank. Funded by Gilead Felowship 257/17 Disclosures Terol: Abbvie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Heavy and Light Chain Monitoring in High Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM-CESAR Trial: Comparison with Conventional and Minimal Residual Disease IMWG Response Assessment

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1852-1852
Author(s):  
Noemi Puig ◽  
Teresa Contreras ◽  
Bruno Paiva ◽  
María Teresa Cedena ◽  
José J Pérez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Minimal Residual

Introduction: The GEM-CESAR trial is a potentially curative strategy for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (HRsMM) patients (pts) in which the primary endpoint is the achievement of bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. However, other methods of disease evaluation in serum such as heavy+light chain (HLC) assessment, with a potential complementary value to the IMWG response criteria, have also been tested. Aim: To evaluate the performance of HLC assay in HRsMM pts at diagnosis and after consolidation, comparing the results with standard serological methods and Next Generation Flow (NGF) for the assessment of bone marrow MRD. Patients and Methods: Ninety HRsMM pts included in the GEM-CESAR trial received six 4-weeks cycles of carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone followed by high dose melphalan and 2 further cycles of consolidation with the same regimen. All pts received maintenance treatment with lenalidomide for up to 2 years. SPEP and IFE were performed using standard procedures. Serum IgGk, IgGl, IgAk and IgAl HLC concentrations were measured using Hevylite (The Binding Site Group Ltd, Birmingham, UK) on a SPA PLUS turbidimeter. HLC concentrations and ratios were considered abnormal if they were outside the 95% reference ranges provided by the manufacturer. MRD was analyzed by flow cytometry following EuroFlow recommendations (sensitivity, 2x10-6). Standard response assignment was carried out as per the IMWG guidelines. Hevylite responses were assigned and HLC-pair suppression was defined as in Michalet et al (Leukemia 2018). Results: Out of 90 HRsMM pts, 75 had monoclonal intact immunoglobulin and samples available at diagnosis (50 IgG and 25 IgA). HLC ratio was abnormal in 98% of IgG pts and in 100% of IgA pts. Response assessment by Hevylite and standard IMWG criteria were available in 62 pts post-consolidation (Table 1). A good agreement was found between the two methods (kappa quadratic weighting = 0,6327 (0,4016 - 0,8638)). Among 46 pts with assigned CR as per the IMWG response criteria, there were 3 and 8 pts in PR and VGPR according to the Hevylite method, respectively. In 62 cases, paired Hevylite and MRD assessment data were available. Concordant results were found in 72.5% of cases (45/62; HLC+/NGF+ in 15 and HLC-/NGF- in 30 cases) while in the remaining 27.4% of cases results were discordant (17/62; HLC-/NGF+ in 6 and HLC+/NGF- in 11 cases). Post-consolidation, 24, 25.8 and 42.3% of the 62 samples were positive by SPEP, NGF and Hevylite, respectively. HLC-pair suppression was identified in 13/62 pts; 10 had severe HLC-pair suppression at the end of consolidation. After a median follow-up of 32 months (8-128), 93% of pts remain alive and progression-free. Three patients that have already progressed had their responses assessed post-consolidation. The first pt was assigned VGPR by the standard IMWG criteria and PR by Hevylite and was MRD positive by NGF; the second pt was assigned CR by IMWG criteria and Hevylite but had severe HLC-pair immunosuppression and was MRD positive by NGF; the third pt was in CR by IMWG and HLC criteria and was MRD positive by MFC. Conclusions: Moderate agreement was found between response assessment by Hevylite and the standard IMWG methods as well as between Hevylite and MRD assessment by NGF. Most discordances were a result of Hevylite detecting disease in samples negative by the standard methods, but longer follow-up is needed to ascertain its clinical value. HLC assessment could have anticipated the progression noted in 2 (out of 3) patients. Disclosures Puig: Takeda, Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; The Binding Site: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Paiva:Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi and Takeda: Consultancy. Rodriguez Otero:Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy. Oriol:Celgene, Amgen, Takeda, Jansse: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Rios:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alegre:Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. de la Rubia:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy. De Arriba:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Ocio:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bladé:Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Irctures: Honoraria. Mateos:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmamar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; EDO: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document