A Prospective Study and Identification of Genomewide Association Markers of Familial Predisposition to Plasma Cell Dyscrasias

Introduction: An increased inherited risk for the development of plasma cell dyscrasias (PCDs) has long been suspected, however to date, only a limited number of potential genomic risk loci have been described. To characterize the inherited risk and facilitate identification of additional risk loci it is important to combine detailed pedigrees with extensive genetic analysis. To identify familial PCDs we initiated a prospective study with active recruitment of a large cohort of patients with PCDs and active screening of their relatives combined with tissue banking and subsequent genetic analysis. Methods: All patients in the Department of Clinical Therapeutics diagnosed with PCDs between January 2017 and January 2019, were offered enrollment in the study. Following informed consent, 1st and 2nd degree relatives over the age of 30 were eligible for screening. A detailed family pedigree was created for each index case with special focus on family history of PCDs, B-cell lymphomas, or other hematologic or solid malignancies. As a control, subjects' spouses were also screened. Screening included serum protein electrophoresis with immunofixation. In families where an additional member was identified with a PCD or B-cell malignancy, peripheral blood was collected from consenting family members over the age of 18 for further genetic analysis. Samples from affected individuals were profiled using whole genome sequencing (WGS) and unaffected individuals were genotyped using Axiom Arrays. Data were analyzed using Axion Array Suite and plink and GATK toolkit with BWA. Results: Of 1,084 patients screened for participation in the study; 752 had multiple myeloma (MM), 77 had smoldering MM, 81 a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, 93 Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia and 81 had AL amyloidosis. 176 (16.2%) patients refused to participate in the study, while 44 (4.1%) patients were ineligible for further screening due to the absence of a living first- or second-degree relative. The median number of screened first or second-degree relatives per index patient was 3 (range 1 to 10). The median age of index cases was 65 years, offspring was 37 years, second-degree relatives was 65 years, and spouses was 65 years. The incidence of a PCD among second-degree relatives was 4.5%, while it was 0.6% among offspring. As a control group, the incidence of PCDs among spouses was 2.6%. Overall at least one additional member (beyond the index patient) with a monoclonal gammopathy was detected in 98 families (11.3%). In 57 families (6.6%) there was a positive history of at least one additional first- or second-degree relative with a PCD or B-cell malignancy. In addition, 41 new cases of monoclonal gammopathy (4.7%) were identified through the screening process associated with this study. To identify genetic loci that could be associated with a predisposition to development of PCDs, genetic analysis was performed on the most heavily affected 18 families, those with at least three affected members or with early onset disease (i.e. PCD diagnosed before age 50). We have evaluated 838,750 SNPs from 103 samples from 18 families. 30 samples were from affected members and 73 from unaffected members. We found eight SNPs (rs13233413, rs11648113, rs59444635, rs148480125, rs113556240, rs11547122, rs671880, rs4726610) that are significantly enriched in affected members with a p-value below the suggestive cut-off of <1e-5. The top candidate was in the untranslated region (UTR) of TSPAN33, a marker of activated and malignant B-cells. We did not detect any significant enrichment in germline mutations in previously reported genes associated with familial PCD risk such as KDM1a, KRAS or DIS3. Functional annotation of the 8 SNPs identified here showed that rs148480125, located in the promoter region of the apoptosis regulator SIVA1, is predicted to impact the allele specific expression level. Further validation work is ongoing. Conclusions: Our active prospective screening approach to identify familial predisposition to PCDs revealed that 11.3% of patients had families with at least one additional affected member and some families had a substantially higher incidence of PCDs with earlier onset. Study of these high-risk families have identified genomewide association markers which in future may help us define familial predisposition to plasma cell dyscrasias. Disclosures Gavriatopoulou: Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Terpos:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis pharma SA: Honoraria, Other: travel expenses , Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: travel expenses , Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Kastritis:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Munshi:Janssen: Consultancy; OncoPep: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; BMS: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; C4: Current equity holder in private company; Adaptive: Consultancy. Dimopoulos:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

False-Negative Centromere 15 Probe Results in Association with African Ancestry in Plasma Cell Dyscrasias

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152654 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4101-4101

Author(s):

Alaa Koleilat ◽

Hongwei Tang ◽

James B Smadbeck ◽

Neeraj Sharma ◽

Kathryn E. Pearce ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Plasma Cell ◽

Monoclonal Gammopathy ◽

Research Funding ◽

African Ancestry ◽

False Negative ◽

Chromosome 15 ◽

Alpha Satellite ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Standard Risk

Abstract Purpose: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell (PC) malignancy with an increasing incidence in the United States. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is currently the gold-standard diagnostic assay to detect recurrent genomic abnormalities of prognostic and therapeutic significance in MM. Hyperdiploid MM, a standard risk abnormality, is characterized by gains of odd-numbered chromosomes including chromosome 15. While gains of chromosome 15 have been reported in approximately 53% of standard risk MM patients (Chretien, Blood, 2015), losses of chromosome 15 are rarely reported. Enumeration of chromosome 15 centromere is detected using the alpha satellite FISH probe. We previously discovered ~9% of cases had false-negative chromosome 15 FISH results when compared to Mate Pair Sequencing (MPseq) (Smadbeck, BCJ, 2019). To our knowledge, no previous studies have reported a reduced performance of the alpha satellite D15Z4 FISH probe in PC FISH studies. A false-negative result for D15Z4 could result in an underreporting of trisomy 15 and overreporting of monosomy 15. Here, we investigated the incidence of false-negative D15Z4 FISH results by examining the presence of monosomy 15 from patients with a monoclonal gammopathy. Methods: We identified 1231 samples from patients with a monoclonal gammopathy who had undergone uniform testing to identify MM-specific cytogenetic abnormalities. DNA from bone marrow samples was genotyped on the Precision Medicine Research Array and biogeographical ancestry was assessed using the Geographic Population Structure Origins tool (Elhaik, Nat Commun, 2014; Home DNA 2016). FISH of immunoglobulin (cIg)-stained PCs was performed as described (Baughn, BCJ, 2018). Chromosome 15 centromere probe (Vysis CEP 15 D15Z4, Abbott Molecular, Abbott Park, IL) was used for chromosome 15 enumeration. Samples were divided into two groups: Cases with or without evidence of monosomy 15 by FISH. Mann-Whitney U test was applied to compare difference between groups for data deviating from normal distribution. A Chi-squared test evaluating the differences across these two groups was used. Results: We identified monosomy 15 in 31 cases (2.5% of cohort). Monosomy 15 was observed in nearly 100% of both the PC (cIg+) and non-PC (cIg-) populations, by contrast to the other recurrent PC-specific genomic abnormalities which were restricted to only the PC population. All samples with a banded analysis revealed most metaphases had two normal chromosome 15s demonstrating that the D15Z4 FISH probe failed to correctly enumerate the number of chromosome 15 centromere signals. Of the samples with a monosomy 15 result, the median African ancestry was 76.2% (95% percentiles: 77.5%-89.0%), while the median African ancestry of the non-monosomy 15 cohort was 2.3% (95% percentiles: 0%-87.7%) (). Although not all patients with >50% African ancestry had evidence of monosomy 15, 26/31 (83.9%) of patients with monosomy 15 had >50% African ancestry. Accordingly, patients with African ancestry (similarity ≥ 0.70) had 8.02-fold (95% confidence interval: 3.73-17.25, P = 9.92 X10 -8) increased possibility to have monosomy 15. Of cases with monosomy 15, 22 (71.0%) had an IGH rearrangement with the most prevalent IGH partner being CCND1. The incidence of t(11;14) was greater in the monosomy 15 group (13/31:41.9%), in contrast to the non-monosomy 15 group (330/1200=27.5%) (P = 0.12). Conclusions: We report a polymorphic variant of the chromosome 15 centromere resulting in a false-negative FISH result using the D15Z4 FISH probe. Surprisingly, the false-negative FISH result was not uniformly distributed among patients and was highly enriched in individuals of African ancestry. This may be due to a variation of the chromosome 15 alpha satellite in some individuals that prevents the D15Z4 FISH probe from sufficiently binding (O'Keefe, Genome Research, 2000). Although this study focused on identification of monosomy 15, the incidence of a false-negative result is likely greater than we have reported in this study since we did not evaluate cases that had a true trisomy 15 that was reported as normal chromosome 15 enumeration by FISH. This study highlights a critical need to ensure diagnostic reagents have equal performance for all patients independent of their ancestry. Evaluation of genomic events using unbiased approaches such as whole genome sequencing may circumvent some of these limitations. Disclosures Elhaik: DDC: Consultancy. Baird: DDC: Current Employment. Kumar: Antengene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Tenebio: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche-Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Carsgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Distinct Gene Expression Signatures in Patients with Richter's Syndrome and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia with Prior Exposure to Ibrutinib

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136172 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 30-31

Author(s):

Hanyin Wang ◽

Shulan Tian ◽

Qing Zhao ◽

Wendy Blumenschein ◽

Jennifer H. Yearley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Activation ◽

Expression Profiles ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

B Cell Activation ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Upregulated Genes

Introduction: Richter's syndrome (RS) represents transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) into a highly aggressive lymphoma with dismal prognosis. Transcriptomic alterations have been described in CLL but most studies focused on peripheral blood samples with minimal data on RS-involved tissue. Moreover, transcriptomic features of RS have not been well defined in the era of CLL novel therapies. In this study we investigated transcriptomic profiles of CLL/RS-involved nodal tissue using samples from a clinical trial cohort of refractory CLL and RS patients treated with Pembrolizumab (NCT02332980). Methods: Nodal samples from 9 RS and 4 CLL patients in MC1485 trial cohort were reviewed and classified as previously published (Ding et al, Blood 2017). All samples were collected prior to Pembrolizumab treatment. Targeted gene expression profiling of 789 immune-related genes were performed on FFPE nodal samples using Nanostring nCounter® Analysis System (NanoString Technologies, Seattle, WA). Differential expression analysis was performed using NanoStringDiff. Genes with 2 fold-change in expression with a false-discovery rate less than 5% were considered differentially expressed. Results: The details for the therapy history of this cohort were illustrated in Figure 1a. All patients exposed to prior ibrutinib before the tissue biopsy had developed clinical progression while receiving ibrutinib. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering using the 300 most variable genes in expression revealed two clusters: C1 and C2 (Figure 1b). C1 included 4 RS and 3 CLL treated with prior chemotherapy without prior ibrutinib, and 1 RS treated with prior ibrutinib. C2 included 1 CLL and 3 RS received prior ibrutinib, and 1 RS treated with chemotherapy. The segregation of gene expression profiles in samples was largely driven by recent exposure to ibrutinib. In C1 cluster (majority had no prior ibrutinb), RS and CLL samples were clearly separated into two subgroups (Figure 1b). In C2 cluster, CLL 8 treated with ibrutinib showed more similarity in gene expression to RS, than to other CLL samples treated with chemotherapy. In comparison of C2 to C1, we identified 71 differentially expressed genes, of which 34 genes were downregulated and 37 were upregulated in C2. Among the upregulated genes in C2 (majority had prior ibrutinib) are known immune modulating genes including LILRA6, FCGR3A, IL-10, CD163, CD14, IL-2RB (figure 1c). Downregulated genes in C2 are involved in B cell activation including CD40LG, CD22, CD79A, MS4A1 (CD20), and LTB, reflecting the expected biological effect of ibrutinib in reducing B cell activation. Among the 9 RS samples, we compared gene profiles between the two groups of RS with or without prior ibrutinib therapy. 38 downregulated genes and 10 upregulated genes were found in the 4 RS treated with ibrutinib in comparison with 5 RS treated with chemotherapy. The top upregulated genes in the ibrutinib-exposed group included PTHLH, S100A8, IGSF3, TERT, and PRKCB, while the downregulated genes in these samples included MS4A1, LTB and CD38 (figure 1d). In order to delineate the differences of RS vs CLL, we compared gene expression profiles between 5 RS samples and 3 CLL samples that were treated with only chemotherapy. RS samples showed significant upregulation of 129 genes and downregulation of 7 genes. Among the most significantly upregulated genes are multiple genes involved in monocyte and myeloid lineage regulation including TNFSF13, S100A9, FCN1, LGALS2, CD14, FCGR2A, SERPINA1, and LILRB3. Conclusion: Our study indicates that ibrutinib-resistant, RS-involved tissues are characterized by downregulation of genes in B cell activation, but with PRKCB and TERT upregulation. Furthermore, RS-involved nodal tissues display the increased expression of genes involved in myeloid/monocytic regulation in comparison with CLL-involved nodal tissues. These findings implicate that differential therapies for RS and CLL patients need to be adopted based on their prior therapy and gene expression signatures. Studies using large sample size will be needed to verify this hypothesis. Figure Disclosures Zhao: Merck: Current Employment. Blumenschein:Merck: Current Employment. Yearley:Merck: Current Employment. Wang:Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Innocare: Research Funding. Parikh:Verastem Oncology: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kenderian:Sunesis: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Torque: Consultancy; Kite: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Kay:Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Braggio:DASA: Consultancy; Bayer: Other: Stock Owner; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding. Ding:DTRM: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Single Arm, Prospective, Open-Label Phase II Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Isatuximab in Patients with Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123496 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3161-3161 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Vikram Premkumar ◽

Suzanne Lentzsch ◽

Divaya Bhutani

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

B Cell ◽

Plasma Cell ◽

Monoclonal Gammopathy ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Cell Clone ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Renal Response ◽

Hematologic Response ◽

Stable Renal Function

Background: Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) is a monoclonal B cell disorder, not meeting the definition of lymphoma or myeloma, that produces monoclonal proteins which deposit in the kidneys. Permanent renal damage can occur either as a consequence of direct deposition of toxic proteins or by an induced inflammatory response. Due to the low burden of the plasma cell clone, patients do not otherwise qualify for potentially toxic anti-plasma cell treatments and treatment is generally based on consensus opinion. To date there are no clinical trials exploring treatment options. Isatuximab is a chimeric mouse/human IgG1k monoclonal antibody which targets CD38 on both malignant and normal plasma cells and exhibits it antitumor effects primarily by antibody-dependent cellular toxicity. Isatuximab has recently been shown to be an active drug in the treatment of multiple myeloma, with improvements seen in hematologic and renal markers, and has been shown to have manageable toxicity. Given the efficacy of isatuximab in multiple myeloma, we propose a trial evaluating isatuximab monotherapy to treat the small plasma cell clone in MGRS with the hopes of maximizing response and minimizing toxicity. Study Design and Methods: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate efficacy of isatuximab monotherapy in patients with MGRS in order to establish a standard of care treatment for patients with this disease. Adult patients with proteinuria of at least 1 gram in 24 hours and a histopathological diagnosis of MGRS on renal biopsy in the last 24 months will be eligible for the trial. Patients will be excluded if their estimated GFR is below 30 mL/min, they have multiple myeloma, high risk smoldering myeloma, other B cell neoplasm meeting criteria for treatment, concurrent diabetic nephropathy, or require dialysis. Patients will be screened for B cell disorders with bone marrow biopsy and aspirate, serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) with immunofixation (IFE), 24-hour urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP), free light chain (FLC) testing and screening PET/CT at time of enrollment. Enrolled patients will be administered isatuximab 20 mg/kg IV weekly for 4 weeks and then will receive the same dose every 2 weeks thereafter for a total of 6 months. Patients may be continued on treatment following completion of the 6 months at the discretion of the provider. To reduce the risk of infusion related reactions, patients will receive premedications with corticosteroids, diphenhydramine, H2 blockade and acetaminophen at least 60 minutes prior to infusion. Patients will have repeat SPEP + IFE, 24-hour UPEP + IFE and FLC testing every 4 weeks. There will be an optional repeat kidney biopsy 9-12 months following treatment initiation to assess pathologic response in the kidneys. Statistical Methods: The study will be comprised of 20 patients being treated with isatuximab over a span of 24-30 months. Ten patients will be initiated on the therapy for a period of 6 months. Interim analysis will be done after these patients have completed all the treatment cycles. If 4 out of 10 patients show response in form of improved/stable renal function, the study will proceed to include next 10 patients. If >50% of the first group of 10 patients show doubling of creatinine while on therapy, that would be considered as an indication to discontinue the therapy and the study due to drug toxicity. Endpoints: The primary endpoint will be efficacy as measured by renal response and hematologic response. Renal response will be measured by assessing the amount of proteinuria in a 24 hour urine sample. A sustained reduction in proteinuria by 30% from the patient's baseline amount of proteinuria with stable renal function (serum eGFR within 20% of baseline) will be considered a positive renal response. Hematologic response will be quantified per the 2016 International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. An important secondary endpoint will be safety and will be analyzed from all patients who receive any study drug. Adverse events will be characterized and graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Other endpoints include time to dialysis and rate of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. Disclosures Lentzsch: Caelum Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Proclara: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Clinical Care Options: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Honoraria; International Myeloma Foundation: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Columbia University: Patents & Royalties: 11-1F4mAb as anti-amyloid strategy. Bhutani:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Our trial will be evaluating the efficacy of targeting CD38 on plasma cells with isatuximab in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS). We will evaluate the effects of this drug on 24 hour proteinuria and hematologic response.

Download Full-text

Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia Outcomes Remain Dismal Despite Novel Agents and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127049 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 266-266

Author(s):

Sagar Patel ◽

Saulius K. Girnius ◽

Binod Dhakal ◽

Lohith Gowda ◽

Raphael Fraser ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Plasma Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Disease Status ◽

Cell Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia ◽

Equity Ownership

Background Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is a rare plasma cell neoplasm with a high mortality rate. There have been improvements in multiple myeloma (MM) outcomes with novel induction agents and use of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with maintenance, but similar progress has not been reported for pPCL. We examined the outcomes of pPCL patients receiving novel agents with autologous (autoHCT) or allogeneic (alloHCT) approaches as reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) in the modern era. Methods From 2008 to 2015, 348 pPCL pts underwent HCT (N = 277 - autoHCT and 71 - alloHCT) with 45% and 48% having research level data available, respectively. Cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse/progression (REL), and probability of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Cox multivariate regression was used to model survival after autoHCT only. Median follow-up in autoHCT and alloHCT was 48 and 60 months, respectively. Results AutoHCT Cohort Median age was 60 years and 93% received HCT within 12 months of diagnosis with 76% after a single line of induction (Table 1). 35% had high risk cytogenetics. 23% received bortezomib, doxorubicin, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (VDPACE). Moreover, 40% received bortezomib (BTZ) and immunomodulatory drug (IMIID)-based triplets. Disease status at HCT was VGPR or better in 47%. 27% received maintenance therapy. At 4 years post-HCT, NRM was 7% (4-11%), REL 76% (69-82%), PFS 17% (13-23%), and OS 28% (22-35%) (Figures 1A, 2A, 2B). Disease status ≥VGPR at HCT and Karnofsky Performance Score >90 significantly predicted superior OS in multivariate analysis. AlloHCT Cohort Median age was 53 years and 89% received HCT within 12 months of diagnosis (Table 1). 61% received a single alloHCT, while 39% used auto-alloHCT tandem approach. 42% had high-risk cytogenetics. 61% received total body irradiation with 44% receiving myeloablative conditioning. Use of VDPACE was higher at 41% in this cohort. VGPR status at HCT was similar (48%), while maintenance was used less often (12%). Grade II-IV acute GVHD occurred in 30% and chronic GVHD in 45%. At four years post-HCT, NRM was 12% (5-21%), REL 69% (56-81%), PFS 19% (10-31%), and OS 31% (19-44%) (Figures 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B). There were no differences in outcomes based on type of HCT. A comparison of post-HCT outcomes of CIBMTR pPCL patients from 1995 to 2006 showed that PFS and OS outcomes are inferior despite lower NRM in this modern cohort (Mahindra et al. Leukemia. 2012). In addition, analysis of SEER (1995-2009) and CIBMTR databases showed that use of HCT increased from 12% (7-21%) in 1995 to 46% (34-64%) in 2009. Conclusion More newly diagnosed pPCL patients are receiving modern induction regimens translating into a higher proportion receiving HCT, but without significant further benefit post-HCT. Post-HCT relapse remains the biggest challenge and further survival in pPCL will likely need a combination of targeted and cell therapy approaches. This study provides a benchmark for future HCT studies for pPCL. Disclosures Girnius: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Dhakal:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Shah:University of California, San Francisco: Employment; Indapta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Oncopeptides, Karoypharm, Surface Oncology, Precision biosciences GSK, Nektar, Amgen, Indapta Therapeutics, Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene, Janssen, Bluebird Bio, Sutro Biopharma: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nkarta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teneobio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Qazilbash:Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Bioclinical: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; Genzyme: Other: Speaker. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. D'Souza:EDO-Mundapharma, Merck, Prothena, Sanofi, TeneoBio: Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy; Pfizer, Imbrium, Akcea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hari:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cell Vault: Equity Ownership; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

High-Throughput Immunofluorescence and Electron Tomography to Characterize Centrosomal Aberrations in Plasma Cell Neoplasia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130713 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3077-3077

Author(s):

Tobias Dittrich ◽

Martin Schorb ◽

Isabella Haberbosch ◽

Elena Bausch ◽

Mandy Börmel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Genomic Instability ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Plasma Cell ◽

High Throughput ◽

Research Funding ◽

Electron Tomography ◽

Automated Analysis ◽

Advisory Committees

Introduction Genomic instability is the basic prerequisite for a Darwinian-type evolution of neoplasia and as such represents a fundamental hallmark of cancer. Centrosomal aberrations have been identified as potent drivers of genomic instability (Cosenza et al., Cell Reports 2017; Krämer et al., Leukemia 2003). The current standard to investigate centrosomal aberrations in cancer patients is immunofluorescence (IF) staining. Although this method is fast and easily scalable, its diagnostic significance is controversially discussed. Moreover, ultrastructural analysis of centrosomes in cancer patients is required to gain a mechanistical understanding of the relationship between genomic instability and centrosomal aberrations. To address this, we combined semi-automated analysis of immunofluorescence (IF) images with high-throughput electron tomography (ET) of different cell lines and subentities of primary plasma cell neoplasia, which serve as surrogate for clonal evolution. Methods CD138+ plasma cells were isolated from bone marrow aspirates of consenting patients with plasma cell neoplasia. Each sample was split to be subsequently processed for IF and ET. The IF workflow included (1) chemical fixation, (2) staining for nuclei, cells, centrin and pericentrin, (3) semi-automated acquisition of >1000 cells, (4) semi-automated analysis of IF data using the software Konstanz Information Miner (KNIME) (Berthold et al., GfKL 2007). The ET workflow included (1) chemical fixation (2) agarose embedding, (3) dehydration and epoxy resin embedding, (4) serial sectioning at 200 nm, (5) semi-automated screening for centrioles with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Schorb et al., Nature Methods 2019), (6) semi-automated acquisition of previously identified centriole regions with serial section ET. Results So far, four patients with relapsed refractory myeloma as well as two cell lines (U2OS-PLK4, RPMI.8226) have been screened with TEM. No centrosomal amplification was apparent by IF in any of these patients. Within 5598 cells, 205 centrosomes have been detected. A total of 659 electron tomograms were performed on 141 regions of interest that were distributed on average over five sections. One patient with highly refractory multiple myeloma (resistance to eight prior therapies) showed over-elongated and partially fragmented centrioles (Figure), similar to recently reported findings in tumor cell lines (Marteil et al., Nature Communications 2018). Six out of 10 mother centrioles in this patient were longer than 500 nm, which is supposed to be the physiological length. The dimensions (mean [range]) of mother (decorated with appendages) and daughter centrioles in this patient were: length 919 nm [406 nm - 2620 nm] and 422 nm [367 nm - 476 nm]; diameter 221 nm [99 nm - 470 nm] and 236 nm [178 nm - 450 nm]. Moreover, the mother centrioles showed multiple sets of appendages (mean [range]: 5.9 [2 - 13]), while one set of appendages would be physiological. This is an ongoing study and additional results are expected by the date of presentation. Conclusions We present a semi-automated methodological setup that combines high-throughput IF and cutting-edge ET to study centrosomal aberrations. To our knowledge, this is the first study that systematically analyzes the centrosomal phenotype of cancer patients at the ultrastructural level. Our preliminary IF results suggest that supernumerary centrosomes in plasma cell neoplasia might be less common than previously reported. Moreover, we for the first time describe and characterize over-elongated centrioles in myeloma patients, reminiscent of previous findings in tumor cell lines. With increasing numbers of patients, we will be also able to correlate results from IF and ET to address the current uncertainty with respect to IF screens for centrosomal aberrations. Better insight into centrosomal aberrations will likely increase our understanding on karyotype evolution in plasma cell neoplasia and possibly facilitate the development of novel targeted therapies. Figure Disclosures Goldschmidt: John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Stiftung: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Müller-Tidow:MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schönland:Medac: Other: Travel Grant; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Krämer:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Dose-Adjusted EPOCH and Rituximab (DA-EPOCH-R) Treatment in Dual Expressor Diffuse Large B-Cell and Double/Triple Hit Lymphomas: TP53 Mutations Influence on Clinical Outcome

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124350 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4116-4116

Author(s):

Anna Dodero ◽

Anna Guidetti ◽

Fabrizio Marino ◽

Cristiana Carniti ◽

Stefania Banfi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Poor Prognosis ◽

Tp53 Mutation ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Tp53 Mutations ◽

Travel Costs ◽

Large B Cell

Introduction: Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is an heterogeneous disease: 30-40% of cases have high expression of MYC and BCL2 proteins (Dual Expressor, DE) and 5-10% have chromosomal rearrangements involving MYC, BCL2 and/or BCL6 (Double-/ Triple-Hit, DH/TH). Although the optimal treatment for those high-risk lymphomas remains undefined, DA-EPOCH-R produces durable remission with acceptable toxicity (Dunleauvy K, Lancet 2018). TP53 mutation is an independent marker of poor prognosis in patients (pts) with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP therapy. However, its prognostic value in poor prognosis lymphomas, receiving intensive therapy, has not been investigated yet. Methods: A series of consecutive pts (n=87) with biopsy proven diagnosis of DE DLBCL (MYC expression ≥40% and BCL2 expression ≥ 50% of tumor cells) or DE-Single Hit (DE-SH, i.e., DE-DLBCL with a single rearrangement of either MYC, BCL2 or BCL6 oncogenes) or DE-DH/TH (MYC, BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements obtained by FISH) were treated with 6 cycles of DA-EPOCH-R and central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis consisting of two courses of high-dose intravenous Methotrexate. Additional eligibility criteria included age ≥18 years and adequate organ functions. Cell of origin (COO) was defined according to Hans algorithm [germinal center B cell like (GCB) and non GCB)]. TP3 mutations were evaluated by next generation sequencing (NGS) based on AmpliseqTM technology or Sanger sequencing and considered positive when a variant allelic frequency ≥10% was detected. Results: Eighty-seven pts were included [n=36 DE only, n=32 DE-SH (n=8 MYC, n=10 BCL2, n=14 BCL6), n=19 DE-DH/TH] with 40 patients (46%) showing a non GCB COO. Pts had a median age of 59 years (range, 24-79 years). Seventy-three pts (84%) had advanced disease and 44 (50%) an high-intermediate/high-risk score as defined by International Prognostic Index (IPI). Only 8 of 87 pts (9%) were consolidated in first clinical remission with autologous stem cell transplantation following DA-EPOCH-R. After a median follow-up of 24 months, 73 are alive (84%) and 14 died [n=12 disease (n=2 CNS disease); n=1 pneumonia; n=1 suicide]. The 2-year PFS and OS were 71% (95%CI, 60-80%) and 76% (95%CI, 61%-85%) for the entire population. For those with IPI 3-5 the PFS and OS were not significant different for DE and DE-SH pts versus DE-DH/TH pts [64% vs 57% p=0.77); 78% vs 57% p=0.12)]. The COO did not influence the outcome for DE only and DE-SH [PFS: 78% vs 71% (p=0.71); 92% vs 86% (p=0.16) for GCB vs non -GCB, respectively]. Fourty-six pts (53%;n=18 DE only, n=18 DE-SH, n=10 DE-DH/TH ) were evaluated for TP53 mutations with 11 pts (24%) carrying a clonal mutation (n=6 in DE, n=3 in DE-SH, n=2 in DE-DH/TH). The 2-year PFS and OS did not significantly change for pts DE and DE-SH TP53 wild type as compared to DE and DE-SH mutated [PFS: 84 % vs 77%, (p=0.45); OS: 87% vs 88%, (p=0.92)]. The two pts DE-DH/TH with TP53 mutation are alive and in complete remission.Conclusions: High risk DLBCL pts treated with DA-EPOCH-R have a favourable outcome independently from high IPI score, DE-SH and DE-DH/TH. Also the presence of TP53 mutations does not negatively affect the outcome of pts treated with this intensive regimen. The efficacy of DA-EPOCH-R in overcoming poor prognostic genetic features in DLBCL should be confirmed in a larger prospective clinical trial. Disclosures Rossi: Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria. Carlo-Stella:Takeda: Other: Travel, accommodations; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Janssen Oncology: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Genenta Science srl: Consultancy; Janssen: Other: Travel, accommodations; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodations, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy. Corradini:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; KiowaKirin: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Jazz Pharmaceutics: Honoraria; Kite: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Roche: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Servier: Honoraria; BMS: Other: Travel Costs.

Download Full-text

Impact of Interim FDG-PET (iPET) in the Outcomes of Patients with Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas Receiving DA-EPOCH-R

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122393 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2898-2898

Author(s):

Vania Phuoc ◽

Leidy Isenalumhe ◽

Hayder Saeed ◽

Celeste Bello ◽

Bijal Shah ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Fdg Pet ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

End Of Treatment

Introduction: 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) remains the standard of care for baseline and end of treatment scans for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). However, the role of interim FDG-PET remains not as well defined across aggressive NHLs, especially in the era of high-intensity chemoimmunotherapy. Interim FDG-PET (iPET) can serve as an early prognostic tool, and prior studies evaluating the utility of iPET-guided treatment strategies primarily focused on diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) and frontline R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). Classification criteria systems assessing response also differ between studies with no clear consensus between use of Deauville criteria (DC), International Harmonization Project (IHP), and the ΔSUVmax method. Methods: This study evaluates our institutional experience with iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin with or without Rituximab) in aggressive NHLs. We retrospectively evaluated 70 patients at Moffitt Cancer Center who started on DA-EPOCH ± R between 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2018 for aggressive NHLs. Response on interim and end-of-treatment (EOT) scans were graded per DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods, and progression free survival (PFS) probability estimates were calculated with chi-square testing and Kaplan Meier method. PFS outcomes were compared between interim negative and positive scans based on each scoring method. Outcomes were also compared between groups based on interim versus EOT positive or negative scans. Results: We identified 70 patients with aggressive NHLs who received DA-EPOCH ± R at our institute. The most common diagnoses were DLBCL (61%) followed by Burkitt's lymphoma (10%), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (9%), plasmablastic lymphoma (7%), gray zone lymphoma (6%), primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma (1%), primary effusion lymphoma (1%), and other high-grade NHL not otherwise specified (3%). Of the 43 patients with DLBCL, 21/43 (49%) had double hit lymphoma (DHL) while 7/43 (16%) had triple hit lymphoma (THL), and 3/43 (7%) had MYC-rearranged DLBCL while 2/43 (5%) had double expressor DLBCL. Thirty nine out of 70 (56%) were female, and median age at diagnosis was 58.39 years (range 22.99 - 86.86 years). Most patients had stage IV disease (49/70, 70%), and 43/70 (61%) had more than one extranodal site while 45/70 (64%) had IPI score ≥ 3. Forty-six out of 70 (66%) received central nervous system prophylaxis, most with intrathecal chemotherapy (44/70, 63%). Fifty-five out of 70 (79%) had iPET available while 6/70 (9%) had interim computerized tomography (CT) scans. Fifty-six out of 70 (80%) had EOT PET, and 4/70 (6%) had EOT CT scans. Sustained complete remission occurred in 46/70 (66%) after frontline DA-EPOCH ± R (CR1), and 12/70 (17%) were primary refractory while 5/70 (7%) had relapse after CR1. Four of 70 (6%) died before cycle 3, and 3/70 (4%) did not have long-term follow-up due to transition of care elsewhere. Median follow-up was 15.29 months (range 0.85 - 60.09 months). There was significantly better PFS observed if iPET showed DC 1-3 compared to DC 4-5 (Χ2=5.707, p=0.0169), and PFS was better if iPET was negative by IHP criteria (Χ2=4.254, p=0.0392) or ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=6.411, p=0.0113). Comparing iPET to EOT PET, there was significantly better PFS if iPET was negative with EOT PET negative (iPET-/EOT-) compared to iPET positive with EOT negative (iPET+/EOT-), and iPET+/EOT+ and iPET-/EOT+ had worse PFS after iPET-/EOT- and iPET+/EOT- respectively. This pattern in iPET/EOT PFS probability remained consistent when comparing DC (Χ2=30.041, p<0.0001), IHP (Χ2=49.078, p<0.0001), and ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=9.126, p=0.0104). These findings fit clinical expectations with positive EOT scans indicating primary refractory disease. There was no significant difference in PFS when comparing DLBCL versus non-DLBCL (Χ2=3.461, p=0.0628) or DHL/THL versus non-DHL/THL diagnoses (Χ2=2.850, p=0.0914). Conclusion: Our findings indicate a prognostic role of iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R for aggressive NHLs. Significant differences in PFS were seen when graded by DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods used in prior studies and when comparing interim versus EOT response. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. Disclosures Bello: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Shah:Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Spectrum/Astrotech: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene/Juno: Honoraria. Sokol:EUSA: Consultancy. Chavez:Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM) Is Preceded By Clonal Lymphopoiesis Including MYD88 L265P in Progenitor B Cells

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126889 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1527-1527

Author(s):

Sara Rodríguez ◽

Cirino Botta ◽

Jon Celay ◽

Ibai Goicoechea ◽

Maria J Garcia-Barchino ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cells ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Somatic Mutations ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Normal Cells ◽

Cell Clones ◽

B Cell Precursors ◽

Myd88 L265p

Background: Although MYD88 L265P is highly frequent in WM, by itself is insufficient to explain disease progression since most cases with IgM MGUS also have mutated MYD88. In fact, the percentage of MYD88 L265P in CD19+ cells isolated from WM patients is typically <100%, which questions if this mutation initiates the formation of B-cell clones. Furthermore, a few WM patients have detectable MYD88 L265P in total bone marrow (BM) cells and not in CD19+ selected B cells, raising the possibility that other hematopoietic cells carry the MYD88 mutation. However, no one has investigated if the pathogenesis of WM is related to somatic mutations occurring at the hematopoietic stem cell level, similarly to what has been shown in CLL or hairy cell leukemia. Aim: Define the cellular origin of WM by comparing the genetic landscape of WM cells to that of CD34 progenitors, B cell precursors and residual normal B cells. Methods: We used multidimensional FACSorting to isolate a total of 43 cell subsets from BM aspirates of 8 WM patients: CD34+ progenitors, B cell precursors, residual normal B cells (if detectable), WM B cells, plasma cells (PCs) and T cells (germline control). Whole-exome sequencing (WES, mean depth 74x) was performed with the 10XGenomics Exome Solution for low DNA-input due to very low numbers of some cell types. We also performed single-cell RNA and B-cell receptor sequencing (scRNA/BCRseq) in total BM B cells and PCs (n=32,720) from 3 IgM MGUS and 2 WM patients. Accordingly, the clonotypic BCR detected in WM cells was unbiasedly investigated in all B cell maturation stages defined according to their molecular phenotype. In parallel, MYD88p.L252P (orthologous position of the human L265P mutation) transgenic mice were crossed with conditional Sca1Cre, Mb1Cre, and Cγ1Cre mice to selectively induce in vivo expression of MYD88 mutation in CD34 progenitors, B cell precursors and germinal center B cells, respectively. Upon immunization, mice from each cohort were necropsied at 5, 10 and 15 months of age and screened for the presence of hematological disease. Results: All 8 WM patients showed MYD88 L265P and 3 had mutated CXCR4. Notably, we found MYD88 L265P in B cell precursors from 1/8 cases and in residual normal B cells from 3/8 patients, which were confirmed by ASO-PCR. In addition, CXCR4 was simultaneously mutated in B cell precursors and WM B cells from one patient. Overall, CD34+ progenitors, B-cell precursors and residual normal B cells shared a median of 1 (range, 0-4; mean VAF, 0.16), 2 (range, 1-5; mean VAF, 0.14), and 4 (range, 1-13; mean VAF, 0.26) non-synonymous mutations with WM B cells. Some mutations were found all the way from CD34+ progenitors to WM B cells and PCs. Interestingly, concordance between the mutational landscape of WM B cells and PCs was <100% (median of 85%, range: 25%-100%), suggesting that not all WB B cells differentiate into PCs. A median of 7 (range, 2-19; mean VAF, 0.39) mutations were unique to WM B cells. Accordingly, many clonal mutations in WM B cells were undetectable in normal cells. Thus, the few somatic mutations observed in patients' lymphopoiesis could not result from contamination during FACSorting since in such cases, all clonal mutations would be detectable in normal cells. Of note, while somatic mutations were systematically detected in normal cells from all patients, no copy number alterations (CNA) present in WM cells were detectable in normal cells. scRNA/BCRseq unveiled that clonotypic cells were confined mostly within mature B cell and PC clusters in IgM MGUS, whereas a fraction of clonotypic cells from WM patients showed a transcriptional profile overlapping with that of B cell precursors. In mice, induced expression of mutated MYD88 led to a moderate increase in the number of B220+CD138+ plasmablasts and B220-CD138+ PCs in lymphoid tissues and BM, but no signs of clonality or hematological disease. Interestingly, such increment was more evident in mice with activation of mutated MYD88 in CD34+ progenitors and B-cell precursors vs mice with MYD88 L252P induced in germinal center B cells. Conclusions: We show for the first time that WM patients have somatic mutations, including MYD88 L265P and in CXCR4, at the B cell progenitor level. Taken together, this study suggests that in some patients, WM could develop from B cell clones carrying MYD88 L265P rather than it being the initiating event, and that other mutations or CNA are required for the expansion of B cells and PCs with the WM phenotype. Disclosures Roccaro: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Transcan2-ERANET: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; European Hematology Association: Research Funding; Transcan2-ERANET: Research Funding; Associazione Italiana per al Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC): Research Funding; Associazione Italiana per al Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC): Research Funding; European Hematology Association: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. San-Miguel:Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Paiva:Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi; unrestricted grants from Celgene, EngMab, Sanofi, and Takeda; and consultancy for Celgene, Janssen, and Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Chromosomal Translocation t(11;14) Induced By the Cre-Loxp System in Normal B Cell-Derived Ips Cells for the Study of Myeloma-Initiating Cells

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-134572 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 18-19

Author(s):

Misaki Sugai ◽

Naohiro Tsuyama ◽

Yu Abe ◽

Yusuke Azami ◽

Kenichi Kudo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cells ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

B Lymphocytes ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chromosomal Translocation ◽

Stem Cell Differentiation ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Myeloma Cells ◽

Company Limited

The cellular origin of multiple myeloma (MM) has not yet been identified. Based on immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) gene analysis, myeloma cells are derived from mature B cells. Chromosomal aberrations such as trisomy and chromosomal translocation (cTr) play a critical role in the early tumorigenesis of MM. We hypothesized that the abnormal cells from which myeloma cells originate might be mature B lymphocytes with chromosomal or genetic changes in the reprogrammed state that enable them to acquire the potential to become tumors in the process of redifferentiation into B lymphocytes. We established induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSs) from normal B lymphocytes (BiPSCs: BiPSC13 & MIB2-6); these BiPSCs have the same VDJ rearrangement of IgH as the original B lymphocytes and differentiate into CD34+/CD38- hematopoietic progenitor cells co-culture with stromal cells, AGM-S3 (Sci Rep, 2017). We then established a method to induce reciprocal cTr t(11;14), which is a reciprocal cTr between IgH and CCND1 and the most frequent cTr in MM, using the CRISPR/Cas9 system; cTr was induced by infection of IgH-CCND1 lentiCRISPRv2 lentivirus, which targets the human IgH Eµ region and 13kb upstream of the CCND1 coding sequence, to BiPSCs (Oncol Lett, 2019). Subsequently, we established cell lines carrying reciprocal cTr t(11;14) between CCND1 and either an allele in which VDJ rearrangement of IgH had been completed or an allele in which VDJ rearrangement had not been completed (stopped at DJ joining) in BiPSC13 t(11;14) (AZ & AX) and MIB2-6 t(11;14) (BC & BG), respectively. These BiPSCs differentiated into CD34+/CD38-/CD45+/-/CD43+/- hematopoietic progenitors cells in co-culture with AGM-S3 or in stem cell differentiation medium; this was subsequently confirmed by the differentiation into granulocytes, macrophages, and erythroblasts in a colony-formation assay. We are now trying to produce BiPSCs in which cTr t(11;14) is induced when they differentiate into mature B cells expressing CD27. First, we used the Cre-loxP recombination system to induce cTr t(11;14) in BiPSCs. BiPSCs were transfected with IgH loxP-Neo-loxP knock-in vector and IgH lentiCRISPRv2 vector. Subsequently, G418-resistant BiPSCs carrying loxP-Neo-loxP in IgH were transfected with iCre-EGFP. After removing the loxP-Neo site from EGFP-positive cells, BiPSCs carrying IgH-loxP were transfected with CCND1 loxP-FRT3-Neo-FRT3 knock-in vector and CCND1 lentiCRISPRv2 vector. Subsequently, G418-resistant BiPSCs carrying IgH-loxP in IgH and loxP-FRT3-Neo-FRT3 in CCND1 were transfected with Flpo-EGFP. After removing the FRT3-Neo site from EGFP-positive cells, BiPSCs carrying IgH-loxP in IgH and CCND1-loxP-FRT3 in CCND1 were transfected with iCre-HygR. Hygromycin B-resistant cells were picked, the reciprocal cTr t(11;14) was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction, and we established BiPSCs with der(11)t(11;14) and BiPSCs with der(14)t(11;14). We also developed a system in which Cre is expressed along with CD27 expression in the B cell lymphoma cell line Raji. These BiPSCs could be useful for the study of myeloma-initiating cells, but whether they would be able to be redifferentiated into B lymphocyte is important. Disclosures Hanamura: Mundipharma K.K.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD K.K.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi K.K.: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; SHIONOGI Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma K.K.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; NIPPON SHINYAKU CO.,LTD.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Japan Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

IKZF3 Overexpression Phenocopies Gain-of-Function Mutation in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-137085 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 9-9

Author(s):

Shanye Yin ◽

Gregory Lazarian ◽

Elisa Ten Hacken ◽

Tomasz Sewastianik ◽

Satyen Gohil ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Dna Binding ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Bcr Signaling ◽

Experimental Group

A hotspot mutation within the DNA-binding domain of IKZF3 (IKZF3-L162R) has been identified as a putative driver in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL); however, its functional effects are unknown. We recently confirmed its role as a CLL driver in a B cell-restricted conditional knock-in model. IKZF3 mutation altered mature B cell development and signaling capacity, and induced CLL-like disease in elderly mice (~40% penetrance). Moreover, we found IKZF3-L162R acts as a gain-of-function mutation, altering DNA binding specificity and target selection of IKZF3, and resulting in overexpression of multiple B-cell receptor (BCR) genes. Consistent with the murine data, RNA-sequencing analysis showed that human CLL cells with mut-IKZF3 [n=4] have an enhanced signature of BCR-signaling gene expression compared to WT-IKZF3 [n=6, all IGHV unmutated] (p<0.001), and also exhibited general upregulation of key BCR-signaling regulators. These results confirm the role of IKZF3 as a master regulator of BCR-signaling gene expression, with the mutation contributing to overexpression of these genes. While mutation in IKZF3 has a clear functional impact on a cardinal CLL-associated pathway, such as BCR signaling, we note that this driver occurs only at low frequency in patients (~3%). Because somatic mutation represents but one mechanism by which a driver can alter a cellular pathway, we examined whether aberrant expression of IKZF3 could also yield differences in BCR-signaling gene expression. We have observed expression of the IKZF3 gene to be variably dysregulated amongst CLL patients through re-analysis of transcriptomic data from two independent cohorts of human CLL (DFCI, Landau et al., 2014; ICGC, Ferreira et al., 2014). We thus examined IKZF3 expression and BCR-signaling gene expression, or the 'BCR score' (calculated as the mean expression of 75 BCR signaling-associate genes) in those cohorts (DFCI cohort, n=107; ICGC cohort, n=274). Strikingly, CLL cells with higher IKZF3 expression (defined as greater than median expression) had higher BCR scores than those with lower IKZF3 expression (<median) (p=0.0015 and p<0.0001, respectively). These findings were consistent with the notion that IKZF3 may act as a broad regulator of BCR signaling genes, and that IKZF3 overexpression, like IKZF3 mutation, may provide fitness advantage. In support of this notion, our re-analysis of a gene expression dataset of 107 CLL samples (Herold Leukemia 2011) revealed that higher IKZF3 expression associated with poorer prognosis and worse overall survival (P=0.035). We previously reported that CLL cells with IKZF3 mutation appeared to increase in cancer cell fraction (CCF) with resistance to fludarabine-based chemotherapy (Landau Nature 2015). Instances of increase in mut-IKZF3 CCF upon treatment with the BCR-signaling inhibitor ibrutinib have been reported (Ahn ASH 2019). These studies together suggest an association of IKZF3 mutation with increased cellular survival following either chemotherapy or targeted treatment. To examine whether higher expression of IKZF3 was associated with altered sensitivity to ibrutinib, we performed scRNA-seq analysis (10x Genomics) of two previously treatment-naïve patients undergoing ibrutinib therapy (paired samples, baseline vs. Day 220). We analyzed an average of 11,080 cells per patient (2000 genes/cell). Of note, following ibrutinib treatment, remaining CLL cells expressed higher levels of IKZF3 transcript compared to pretreatment baseline (both p<0.0001), whereas no such change was observed in matched T cells (n ranging between 62 to 652 per experimental group, p>0.05), suggesting that cells with high expression of IKZF3 were selected by ibrutinib treatment. Moreover, we showed that ibrutinib treatment resulted in consistent upregulation of BCR-signaling genes (e.g., CD79B, LYN, GRB2, FOS, RAC1, PRKCB and NFKBIA) (n ranging between 362 to 1374 per experimental group, all p<0.0001), which were likewise activated by mutant IKZF3. Altogether, these data imply that IKZF3 mutation or overexpression may influence upregulation of BCR-signaling genes and enhance cellular fitness even during treatment with BCR-signaling inhibitors. We highlight our observation that IKZF3 mutation appears to be phenocopied by elevated IKZF3 expression, and suggest that alterations in mRNA or protein level that mimic genetic mutations could be widespread in human cancers. Disclosures Kipps: Pharmacyclics/ AbbVie, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc., Specialized Center of Research (SCOR) - The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (LLS), California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech/Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; VelosBio: Research Funding; Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc.: Other: Cirmtuzumab was developed by Thomas J. Kipps in the Thomas J. Kipps laboratory and licensed by the University of California to Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc., which provided stock options and research funding to the Thomas J. Kipps laboratory, Research Funding; Ascerta/AstraZeneca, Celgene, Genentech/F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Gilead, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Octernal Therapeutics, Pharmacyclics/AbbVie, TG Therapeutics, VelosBio, and Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wu:BionTech: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text