scholarly journals Preliminary Results of an Ongoing Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study of the Novel Anti-CD74 Antibody Drug Conjugate (ADC), STRO-001, in Patients with B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 29-30
Author(s):  
Nirav N. Shah ◽  
Ahmad H. Mattour ◽  
Leslie L. Popplewell ◽  
Charalambos Andreadis ◽  
Jason M. Melear ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Dlbcl Patient ◽  
Car T ◽  
Dose Levels

Background: CD74 is highly expressed on B cell malignancies, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). STRO-001, a novel CD74-targeting ADC was generated using cell-free protein synthesis and site-specific conjugation platform technologies. STRO-001 contains a potent maytansinoid warhead conjugated to two specific sites (drug-antibody ratio of 2) using a stable non-cleavable linker. This first-in-human Phase 1, open-label, multicenter, dose escalation study was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of STRO-001 in adults with B-cell malignancies (NHL and multiple myeloma). Herein we report preliminary results from the B-cell NHL cohort. Methods: Patients with advanced, relapsed/refractory NHL are eligible for enrollment. STRO-001 is administered as a 60-minute IV infusion. STRO-001 was initially administered on Days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Starting at 0.91 mg/kg, STRO-001 was administered on Day 1 of a 3-week cycle. Treatment is administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The study employed a modified 3+3 design with an accelerated dose titration (N=1 per cohort until set specified AEs are observed) for initial dosing cohorts. Results: 18 patients with NHL have been treated at 9 dose levels: .05, .075, .15, .27, .43, .65, .91, 1.27 and 1.78 mg/kg. NHL subtypes include: 6 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 5 follicular lymphoma (FL), 2 mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), 2 marginal zone lymphoma, 1 Burkitt's lymphoma, 1 composite DLBCL/FL and 1 composite DLBCL/CLL. Median age is 64.5 (range 21-82). Median ECOG performance status is 1 (range 0-2). Median number of prior therapies is 4 (range 1-12). Three patients received prior CAR-T therapy. Median number of STRO-001 doses administered is 2 (range 1-12). 17 patients have completed at least one cycle of STRO-001 and are evaluable for safety and toxicity for dose escalation recommendation. One patient at the 1.78 mg/kg dose level is currently completing Cycle 1 and not yet evaluable for DLT assessment. Most AEs are grade 1 or 2 (90%) with the most common grade 1-2 TEAEs of chills, fatigue, nausea, anemia, headache, pyrexia, infusion reaction, decreased appetite, and abdominal pain occurring in ≥ 20% of patients. There was one DLT in the NHL cohort, a grade 3 thromboembolic event at the 0.91 mg/kg dose level. 16 patients are evaluable for response. The preliminary clinical benefit/disease control rate for all patients is 25% (4/16) including 1 patient with complete response (CR) 2 with partial response (PR) and 1 with stable disease (Table). One patient with DLBCL treated at .075 mg/kg achieved a CR after 2 cycles (4 doses) and progressed after 12 doses (on study 24 weeks). A DLBCL patient treated at 0.65 mg/kg achieved a PR at Cycle 3 and progressed after 8 doses (on study 15 weeks). A DLBCL patient treated at 1.27 mg/kg who achieved a PR has received 10 cycles and remains on study after 27 weeks. Preliminary PK analysis of ADC shows exposure increased (Cmax from 0.39 to 19 µg/mL) and (AUC0-tlast from 0.6 to 71 h*µg/mL) as dose increased from 0.05 to 0.91 mg/kg. Summary/Conclusion: STRO-001 is the first ADC generated with novel cell-free protein synthesis technology and site-specific conjugation to be tested in the clinic. STRO-001 has been well-tolerated. No ocular or neuropathy toxicity signals have been observed and the MTD has not been reached. Preliminary anti-tumor activity has been observed in this heavily pre-treated patient population, including two DLBCL patients who had previously progressed after a CAR-T (Table). The study continues to enroll patients in dose escalation. Next planned dose levels are 2.5 mg/kg and 3.5 mg/kg. This study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03424603. Table Disclosures Shah: Verastim: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lily: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cell Vault: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Miltenyi Biotec: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy. Popplewell:Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Andreadis:Gilead/Kite: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; BMS/Celgene/Juno: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Melear:AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Spira:Cardiff Oncology: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; ADCT: Research Funding. Manda:AbbVie: Other: Investigator in AbbVie-sponsored clinical trials. Burke:Roche: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Morphosys: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau. Sharman:TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding. Krishnan:Sanofi: Consultancy; Sutro: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Stock BMS, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Z Predicta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shah:BMS, Janssen, Bluebird Bio, Sutro Biopharma, Teneobio, Poseida, Nektar: Research Funding; GSK, Amgen, Indapta Therapeutics, Sanofi, BMS, CareDx, Kite, Karyopharm: Consultancy. Kuriakose:Sutro Biopharma: Current Employment. Berman:Sutro Biopharma: Current Employment. Matheny:Sutro Biopharma: Current Employment. Leonard:Miltenyi: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; GenMab: Consultancy; Sutro: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; MEI Pharma: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy. Molina:Sutro Biopharma: Current Employment.

scholarly journals A Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study of ARQ 531 in Selected Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Hematologic Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3136-3136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Woyach ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Deborah M. Stephens ◽  
Farrukh T. Awan ◽  
Kerry A. Rogers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Tumor Reduction ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

Abstract Background: Aberrant activation of B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling is considered to be a major oncogenic mechanism that leads to the development and progression of multiple B-cell malignancies. ARQ 531 is a reversible ATP competitive inhibitor of BTK that inhibits ibrutinib-resistant BTK-C481S mutant CLL cells and has demonstrated antitumor activity in CLL, Richter's transformation, and DLBCL mouse models. Objectives: The primary objectives of the clinical study are to assess the safety and tolerability, and to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose and schedule of ARQ 531. The secondary objectives are to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, pharmacodynamic (PD) activity, and preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity of ARQ 531. Methods: This is a first in human, Phase 1 dose escalation study in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL/SLL, Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, or B-cell NHL who received at least 2 prior lines of systemic therapy. Prior therapy must have included a BTK inhibitor, if FDA approved for their disease. Dose escalation was performed according to a 3+3 study design. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed per NCI CTCAE v.4.03. Tumor responses were evaluated per disease specific guidelines. Results: A total of 16 patients enrolled (median age 65.5 years, male 93.8%, 2 DLBCL, 2 follicular lymphoma, 12 CLL/SLL, 5 median prior systemic regimens) and were treated at dose levels of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30mg QD. No dose limiting toxicities have been reported with ARQ 531. Drug related TEAEs included diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, pneumonia, amylase increased, lipase increased, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, decreased appetite, hypernatraemia, arthralgia, groin pain, dizziness, facial paralysis, headache, tremor and restlessness in one patient (6.3%) each. Drug related grade 3 or worse TEAEs included lipase increased and platelet count decreased in one patient (6.3%) each. No drug related serious TEAEs were reported. Among the 12 patients who have received at least 1 dose of study drug and have at least 1 post-treatment tumor measurement data, 5 achieved stable disease (SD) (1 follicular lymphoma, 1 DLBCL, 3 CLL) and 7 had progressive disease (6 CLL, 1 follicular lymphoma). Three of 5 SD patients (1 follicular lymphoma, 1 DLBCL, 1 CLL) had 35%, 34% and 29% tumor reduction and 2 of them are ongoing on study treatment at 53 and 18 weeks. The CLL patient with 29% tumor reduction had BTK C481S mutation. Preliminary PK data showed ARQ 531 exposure was close to dose proportional and the estimated plasma half-life generally ranged from 20-24 hours. Consistent with increases in exposure, pBTK knockdown was observed. In Cohort 4 (20mg QD), all three patients showed 100% pBTK knockdown at a mean plasma Cmax exposure of 300nM (~4h post dose). Levels of CCL3 protein, a plasma biomarker for BCR pathway activation, was significantly suppressed in CLL patients. Conclusions: ARQ 531 has demonstrated a manageable safety profile to date. Diminished pBTK signaling and CCL3 protein levels have been observed in CLL patients. Additionally, preliminary anti-tumor activity has been observed at doses of ARQ 531 that were not predicted to completely inhibit BTK. Updated safety, PK, biomarker and anti-tumor activity data will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Flinn: Gilead: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; ArQule: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding. Savage:ArQule, Inc.: Employment. Eathiraj:ArQule, Inc.: Employment. Tith:ArQule, Inc.: Employment.

scholarly journals MM-004: A Phase 1, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose, Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Dexamethasone in Patients with Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Japan

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2107-2107
Author(s):  
Shinsuke Iida ◽  
Hiromi Iwasaki ◽  
Takaaki Chou ◽  
Kensei Tobonai ◽  
Kazutaka Sunami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Single Dose ◽  
Plasma Concentration ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Multiple Doses ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background: Patients (pts) with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have exhausted treatment (Tx) with lenalidomide (LEN) or thalidomide (THAL) and bortezomib (BORT) have shortened overall survival (OS; Kumar, Leukemia, 2012). Pomalidomide (POM) is a novel oral IMiDs® immunomodulatory agent with direct antimyeloma and stromal cell inhibitory effects (Quach, Leukemia, 2010; Mark, Leuk Res, 2014). POM 4 mg (± dexamethasone) is approved in some countries for Tx of pts with RRMM based on phase 3 results showing significant improvement vs high-dose dexamethasone in response, progression-free survival (PFS), and OS and phase 1/2 results showing high and durable overall response rates (ORRs; Richardson, Blood, 2013; Richardson, Blood, 2014; San Miguel, Lancet Oncol, 2013). MM-004 is a phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study designed to assess the tolerated dose (TD), safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of POM alone or POM + low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) in Japanese pts with RRMM. Methods: Pts must have been ≥ 20 yrs old with a documented diagnosis of MM, have had ≥ 2 prior lines of anti-MM Tx including ≥ 2 cycles of LEN and BORT (alone or in combination), and have RRMM defined as progressive disease (PD) during or within 60 days of completing their last anti-MM Tx. Tx consisted of POM 2 mg (Cohort 1) or 4 mg (Cohort 2) day (D) 1-21 of a 28-D cycle and DEX 40 mg (20 mg for pts > 75 yrs) D1, 8, 15, and 22 (starting on cycle 2). Tx was continued until PD, unacceptable adverse event (AE), or voluntary withdrawal. Pts enrolled in Cohort 1 received a single dose of POM 0.5 mg at D7 for PK evaluation. The primary endpoint was TD; secondary endpoints included ORR based on International Myeloma Working Group criteria, objective response, duration of response (DOR), PFS, PK, and safety. Results: Twelve pts were enrolled (6 in each cohort); 2 pts remain on Tx as of June 27, 2014 (Cohort 2, n= 2). Median age was 68 yrs (range, 52-76 yrs); 75% of pts were aged > 65 yrs. Median number of prior anti-MM Tx was 6 (range, 4-10) and baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) was ≥ 60 mL/min for all pts except one. Six pts received prior THAL-based Tx (Cohort 1, n= 3; Cohort 2, n= 3). TD was determined to be POM 4 mg D1-21 of a 28-D cycle (a dose-limiting toxicity of grade 4 neutropenia for ≥ 7 days was observed in 1 pt in cohort 1). This result showed that the TD of POM in Japanese pts with MM was the same as that in Caucasian pts with MM. Median duration of treatment was 6.5 cycles in all pts. The best ORR (≥ partial response [PR]) was 25% (3/12 pts) across both cohorts; ORR was 17% (1/6) in Cohort 1 and 33% (2/6) in Cohort 2. Overall median PFS was 5.5 months (5.1 months in Cohort 1; not reached in Cohort 2). Maximum POM plasma concentration (Cmax) was 9.1, 35.6, and 70.2 ng/mL after single dose of POM 0.5, 2, and 4 mg, respectively, and was reached at times ranging from 0.9 to 6 h. Cmax was 37.6 and 71.2 ng/mL after multiple doses of POM 2 and 4 mg. Systemic POM exposure as measured by geometric means of area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) was 84.9, 364.4, and 685.7 ng•h /mL after a single doses of POM 0.5, 2, and 4 mg, respectively. AUC was 411.5 and 713.8 ng•h /mL after multiple doses of POM 2 mg and 4 mg. Both Cmax and AUC exposures increased in a dose-proportional manner from 0.5 to 4 mg, as assessed by both visual inspection and statistical analysis. Clearance and volume of distribution were similar across dose levels. The mean half-life (t1/2) of POM was comparable across dose levels, with t1/2 of approximately 6.4, 6.9, and 6 h after single doses of POM 0.5, 2, and 4 mg, respectively. After multiple doses of POM 2 mg and 4 mg, t1/2was approximately 7.3 and 5.5 h. Grade ≥ 3 AEs occurred in 11 pts (92%), and the most frequently reported AE was neutropenia (8 pts, 67%). Other frequently reported AEs (all grades) were thrombocytopenia, anemia, leukopenia, and peripheral edema. Conclusions: POM 4 mg was identified as the TD in Japanese pts with RRMM, which is consistent with previous findings in Caucasian pts with MM. However, pts should be monitored for the known AE profile of POM and managed appropriately. The combination of POM with LoDEX was also found to be tolerable in Japanese pts with RRMM. Systemic exposure to POM increased dose proportionally, and limited drug accumulation was observed following multiple doses. Responses (≥ PR) were observed in 25% of pts. Further investigation of the efficacy and safety of POM + LoDEX in Japanese pts with RRMM in a phase 2 trial is warranted. Disclosures Iida: Celgene Corp: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tobonai:Ono: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Sunami:Celgene Corp: Honoraria. Kurihara:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Midorikawa:Celgene: Employment. Zaki:Celgene : Employment, Equity Ownership. Doerr:Celgene Corp: Employment.

scholarly journals Subcutaneous Epcoritamab in Combination with R-CHOP in Patients with Previously Untreated High-Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Preliminary Results from a Phase 1/2 Trial

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1413-1413
Author(s):  
David Belada ◽  
Jacob Haaber Christensen ◽  
Kristina Drott ◽  
Sylvia Snauwaert ◽  
Joshua Brody ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Metabolic Response ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: In patients (pts) with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) that is considered high risk (revised International Prognostic Index [R-IPI]: 3-5), standard treatment with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is associated with a 4-year overall survival rate of 55% (Sehn et al, Blood 2007). Epcoritamab (DuoBody ®-CD3×CD20) is a subcutaneously administered bispecific antibody that simultaneously binds to CD3 on T cells and CD20 on malignant B cells to induce T-cell-mediated killing. Single-agent epcoritamab demonstrated a manageable safety profile and substantial antitumor activity in pts with heavily pretreated B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in the first-in-human phase 1/2 trial (EPCORE NHL-1; NCT03625037). Among pts with relapsed/refractory DLBCL treated at the identified recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 48 mg (n=8), the overall response rate was 88% and the complete response rate was 38% (Hutchings, Lancet, in press). These encouraging data supported initiation of the EPCORE NHL-2 phase 1/2 trial (NCT04663347), which is evaluating epcoritamab in combination with various standard of care therapies in pts with B-cell NHL. We present data from arm 1 of this trial, in which epcoritamab in combination with R-CHOP is evaluated in pts with previously untreated high-risk DLBCL. Methods: Adults with previously untreated DLBCL and an R-IPI score ≥3 received flat-dose epcoritamab in combination with standard R-CHOP for 6 cycles followed by epcoritamab monotherapy. The study includes a dose-escalation cohort (epcoritamab doses: dose level 1 = 24 mg; dose level 2 = 48 mg). Step-up dosing of epcoritamab (ie, priming and intermediate doses before first full dose) and corticosteroid prophylaxis were used as previously described (Hutchings, Lancet, in press) to mitigate cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Tumor response was evaluated by positron emission tomography-computed tomography obtained once every 6 weeks for the first 24 weeks. Results: As of July 15, 2021, 9 pts have been treated with the combination of epcoritamab + R-CHOP (4 with epcoritamab 24 mg; 5 with 48 mg). Median age was 66 years (range, 56-78). All pts had stage III-IV disease. At data cutoff, all pts remained on treatment with a median follow-up of 12.2 weeks (range, 2.2-28.2). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were CRS (56%; all grade 1/2), anemia (56%; grade 1-3), neutropenia (44%; all grade 3/4), fatigue (33%; all grade 1/2), and peripheral neuropathy (33%; all grade 1/2). Notably, no grade ≥3 CRS events or cases of febrile neutropenia were reported. No dose-limiting toxicities have been observed. Four pts have had ≥1 response assessment, with 3 achieving complete metabolic response (CMR; all in the epcoritamab 24 mg dose-escalation cohort) and 1 pt achieving partial metabolic response (epcoritamab 48 mg cohort) by week 6; 2 of the 3 pts with CMR had response assessments at 6 months, and both remained in CMR at that time. Both dose cohorts have been cleared by the Dose Escalation Committee and Safety Committee, and the expansion part has been opened to enroll additional pts. Conclusions: These preliminary data from a small number of pts suggest that epcoritamab in combination with R-CHOP has a manageable safety profile with no new safety signals. Adverse events were similar to those previously reported for epcoritamab and R-CHOP individually. All evaluable pts achieved early responses, and all pts remain on treatment. Updated and additional data from pts treated in the expansion phase will be presented. These findings warrant further evaluation of epcoritamab for the treatment of high-risk, newly diagnosed DLBCL. Disclosures Belada: Genmab: Research Funding. Drott: Roche: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria; Respiratorius AB: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Narkhede: TG Therapeautics: Research Funding; Genmab: Other: Medical writing support, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Elliot: Genmab: Current Employment, Patents & Royalties: P158-US-PSP3 . Liu: Genmab: Current Employment. Cota Stirner: AbbVie: Current Employment. Abbas: Genmab: Current Employment. Falchi: Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genmab: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding. Clausen: Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expences ASH 2019; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Travel expences 15th ICML ; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals A Phase 1 Study of NKX019, a CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor Natural Killer (CAR NK) Cell Therapy, in Subjects with B-Cell Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3868-3868
Author(s):  
Michael Dickinson ◽  
Nada Hamad ◽  
Christian E Bryant ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Chitra Hosing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Nk Cells ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T

Abstract Background: B-cell lineage cancers are a worldwide healthcare burden. Over 500,000 new cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and 50,000 new cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are diagnosed world-wide each year (seer.cancer.gov, Smith 2015, Solomon 2017). Despite progress in treatment, many patients diagnosed with this heterogeneous group of cancers still succumb to their disease. Recently approved autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells specific for CD19 have altered the treatment landscape for some patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell malignancies, though significant toxicities associated with T-cell expansion and the necessity for bespoke manufacturing have limited their use. Natural killer (NK) cells, part of the innate immune system, efficiently recognize transformed cells and are particularly suited to address limitations of the approved CAR T products (Marcus 2014, Morvan 2016). Lacking a T-cell receptor and the consequent clonal expansion, non-engineered NK cells have been safely administered after lymphodepletion without side effects typically associated with T-cell therapies, such as severe cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity (Bachier 2020). Allogeneic NK cell-based therapies allow off-the-shelf use, obviating the necessity to wait for manufacture of autologous T-cell therapies. CD19-directed CAR NK cells have been administered safely, with promising preliminary efficacy (Liu 2020). NKX019 is a cryopreserved product, composed of expanded NK cells engineered to express a humanized CAR against CD19, fused to co-stimulatory (OX40) and signaling (CD3ζ) domains to enhance their intrinsic antitumor activity. NKX019 also expresses a membrane-bound interleukin-15 (IL-15) to serve as an autocrine growth factor and thereby increase NKX019 persistence, with an in vivo half-life of over up to 28 days without systemic IL-2 support. Preclinical characterization has shown that NKX019 cells are 10 times more effective at killing CD19+ target cells than non-engineered NK cells, resulting in greater suppression of xenograft tumor models (Morisot 2020). Further, NKX019, unlike CD19 CAR T cells, retained cytotoxicity even when CD19 antigen density was reduced >50x on target cells. Hence, clinical evaluation of NKX019 is being undertaken in this Phase 1 study in subjects with R/R NHL or ALL. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, Phase 1 study of NKX019 (Figure). The study will be conducted in 2 parts: Part 1 (dose finding) to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of NKX019 separately in adult patients with CAR T naïve R/R NHL or B-ALL, utilizing a "3+3" enrollment schema. Part 2 (dose expansion) will further evaluate safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, pharmacodynamics (PDn), and antitumor activity of NKX019 using RP2D with separate expansion cohorts for patients with ALL as well as different subtypes of NHL, including a cohort of CAR T pretreated large B-cell lymphoma. NKX019 is being manufactured from NK cells obtained from healthy adult donors. The study evaluates two dose levels of NKX019: 3 × 10 8 and 1 × 10 9 viable CAR+ NK cells. NKX019 will be administered on Days 0, 7, and 14 of a 28-day cycle following standard fludarabine/cyclophosphamide lymphodepletion (Table). Up to 5 total cycles may be administered based on response and tolerability assessed at the end of each cycle. The primary endpoint is incidence of adverse events, dose-limiting toxicities, clinically significant laboratory abnormalities, and determination of the RP2D. Secondary endpoints include evaluation of standard cellular PK parameters, PDn, immunogenicity, and antitumor responses. Subjects will be assessed for efficacy using disease-specific criteria: Lugano classification with LYRIC refinement for pseudo-progression (NHL), 2018 International Workshop (IW) criteria (CLL), 6th IW criteria (Waldenström macroglobulinemia [WM]), and National Comprehensive Cancer Version 1.2020 (B-ALL) (Cheson 2006, Cheson 2014, Hallek 2018, Owen 2013, Brown 2020). Enrollment across multiple sites in the US and Australia is expected to start in the second half of 2021. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Dickinson: Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Hamad: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Bryant: Jansen, BMS/Celgene, Skyline Diagnostics: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria. Borthakur: Astex: Research Funding; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: Current Employment; Protagonist: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy; Ryvu: Research Funding; ArgenX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hosing: Nkarta Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shook: Nkarta Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Tan: Nkarta Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Rajangam: Nkarta Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Liu: SITC: Honoraria; BMS; Karyopharm; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Agios; NGM Biopharmaceuticals; BeiGene: Consultancy. McSweeney: Kite-Gilead: Consultancy; Kite-Gilead, Autolus, Novartis: Research Funding; Kite-Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Hill: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZenica: Consultancy, Honoraria; Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte/Morphysis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gentenech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene (BMS): Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

A Phase 1, Multicenter Study of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Proteasome Inhibitor Exposed and Lenalidomide-Refractory Myeloma (Trial MM-005)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3036-3036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Craig Hofmeister ◽  
Noopur S. Raje ◽  
David Siegel ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drug ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: The combination of an immunomodulatory drug with the proteasome inhibitor (PI), bortezomib (BORT), and low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) has demonstrated preclinical synergy and considerable clinical activity in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM; Mitsiades et al Blood, 2002; Richardson et al Blood, 2014). Treatment (Tx) with the immunomodulatory drug pomalidomide (POM) + LoDEX has been shown to delay disease progression and extend survival in patients (pts) with myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide (LEN) and BORT (Richardson et al Blood, 2014; San Miguel et al Lancet Oncol, 2013). This approach was tested using POM + BORT + LoDEX (PVd) in MM-005; preliminary results showed that PVd was effective and well tolerated in LEN-refractory and BORT-exposed pts. Subcutaneous (SC) BORT was shown to be non-inferior to intravenous (IV) BORT and had an improved safety profile in RRMM (Moreau et al Lancet Oncol, 2011). In addition to a cohort of PVd with IV BORT, MM-005 included a cohort of PVd with SC BORT. Methods: In this phase 1 dose-escalation trial, pts must have received 1-4 lines of prior Tx, with ≥ 2 consecutive cycles of LEN plus a PI. Pts had to be PI exposed and refractory to LEN but not to BORT. A 3 + 3 design with 21-day cycles was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Cycles 1-8 of dose-escalation cohorts received POM (1-4 mg/day on days 1-14), IV or SC BORT (1-1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11), and LoDEX (20 mg/day, or 10 mg/day for pts aged > 75 years, on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12) until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable adverse event (AE). After cycle 8, BORT was administered on days 1 and 8, and LoDEX was administered on days 1, 2, 8, and 9. The primary endpoint was MTD, and secondary endpoints included safety, overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response [PR]), duration of response (DOR), and time to response. Results: Of the 34 pts enrolled from March 2012 to August 2014, the median age was 58.5 years (range, 36-76 years) and 59% were male. The median number of prior antimyeloma Tx lines (PAMTL) was 2 (range, 1-4), the proportion of pts with ≥ 2 PAMTL was 56%, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was ≤ 1 for all pts. All pts were refractory to LEN, and all were exposed to prior PI (33 pts [97%] received prior BORT and 2 pts [6%] received prior ixazomib). All pts discontinued Tx, most commonly due to PD (n = 23), but none due to Tx-related AEs. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported in the dose-escalation cohorts or at the maximum planned dose (MPD) of POM 4 mg, BORT 1.3 mg/m2, and LoDEX 20 mg (10 mg for pts aged > 75 years). The median number of Tx cycles received was 9 (range, 2-36) for all pts and was 11 (range, 2-19) vs 8 (range, 3-15) in the MPD with IV BORT (n = 10) vs SC BORT (n = 12) cohorts. The ORR for all pts was 65% (n = 22), with 2 complete responses (CRs), 1 stringent CR, 10 very good PRs (VGPRs), and 9 PRs; all pts achieved at least stable disease. The median DOR for the 22 responders was 7.4 months. Commonly reported grade 3/4 AEs were more frequent at the MPD level with IV BORT vs SC BORT (90% vs 75%), including neutropenia (60% vs 17%), thrombocytopenia (40% vs 8%), and pneumonia (30% vs 8%). There were no reports of grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy (PN) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in any of the cohorts. Conclusions: PVd was effective, with an ORR of 65% in pts with LEN-refractory and PI-exposed myeloma. PVd was well tolerated, with no grade 3/4 PN or DVT and no Tx discontinuation due to Tx-related AE; toxicities were well managed. Moreover, AEs were generally less frequent with SC vs IV BORT. Thus, the favorable tolerability and efficacy of PVd, which could be a highly attractive therapeutic option in pts with RRMM, is under further evaluation in the large ongoing phase 3 trial MM-007. Disclosures Richardson: Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Pomalidomide in combination with bortezomib. Raje:BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding. Siegel:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Speakers Bureau. Lonial:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Laubach:Novartis: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Vesole:Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Nooka:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Zaki:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Herring:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Li:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shah:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chen:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Oncocorp: Equity Ownership; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; acetylon pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Gilead: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Mature Results of a Phase 1-2 Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study of Intravenous SNS01-T in Patients (pts) with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4464-4464 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Siegel ◽  
Andrew McDonald ◽  
Nicolas Novitzky ◽  
William Bensinger ◽  
Michael Craig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Infusion Reaction ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (eIF5A) has been implicated in the regulation of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and inflammation. SNS01-T is a novel therapeutic with a dual mechanism of eIF5A modulation: inducing cell death via siRNA-mediated inhibition of hypusinated eIF5A while simultaneously causing over-expression of pro-apoptotic eIF5AK50R via a DNA plasmid with a B-cell promoter to induce tumor cell death, using a PEI vector. SNS01-T significantly inhibits tumor growth and increases survival in mouse models of myeloma (MM), mantle cell and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Methods This is an open label, phase 1-2 dose escalation study in pts with refractory B-cell cancers, comprising 4 SNS01-T dose cohorts: 0.0125, 0.05, 0.2 and 0.375 mg/kg twice weekly IV for 6 weeks. Key inclusion criteria are: MM per IMWG criteria or lymphomas or plasma cell leukemia with histologic confirmation; measurable disease, relapsed or refractory after ≥2 prior regimens; not eligible for standard therapy known to extend life expectancy. Primary endpoints are safety and tolerability of SNS01-T. Secondary endpoints include pharmacokinetics, tumor response (M protein, % plasma cells, radiologic response) and time to relapse or progression. Efficacy assessments were performed at baseline and after 12 infusions in all pts (week 6); myeloma pts were also assessed at week 3. Results All cohorts will have completed enrollment in August 2014 and dosing in cohort 4 will be complete by September. A total of 21 pts have been treated, of whom 18 currently have data available. Demographics are provided in Table 1. Abstract 4464. Table 1:DemographicsSNS01-T DoseOverall(n=18)0.0125 mg/kg(n=6)0.05 mg/kg(n=4)0.2 mg/kg(n=4)0.375 mg/kg(n=4)Median age (range)63 (55-77)61.5 (57-66)63 (60-77)68 (66-74)58 (55-71)Male, n (%)12 (67)5 (83)03 (75)4 (100)Caucasian, n (%)17 (94)6 (100)3 (75)4 (100)4 (100)Median weight in kg (range)84 (53-117)81 (69-103)58 (53-87)86 (77-92)97 (81-117)Median performance status (range)1 (0-2)1 (0-1)1 (0-2)0 (0-2)1 (0-1)Cancer type, n (%) Multiple myeloma DLBCL15 (83) 3 (17)6 (100) 03 (75) 1 (25)2 (50) 2 (50)4 (100) 0Median prior therapies (range)5 (2-17)4.5 (3-12)6.5 (2-13)7.5 (2-17)7 (5-14) Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were reported for all pts. The most frequently reported System Organ Classes were General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions (72%) and Gastrointestinal Disorders (56%), with somewhat higher reporting frequency in dose cohorts 3 and 4. The most commonly reported AEs were fatigue (50%), nausea (33%), infusion-related reaction (33%), chills (28%), thrombocytopenia (22%) and pyrexia (17%). Thrombocytopenia, nausea, fatigue, infusion reaction appeared to show some degree of dose relationship. Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 50% of pts with no obvious dose relationship. The only grade ≥3 TEAE reported in >1 pt was thrombocytopenia (17%). There have been no treatment-related deaths. There was 1 DLT at dose level 4 (0.375 mg/kg). Pt 51-001 did not receive premedication prior to the third infusion of SNS01-T and consequently experienced a grade 4 infusion reaction, from which all symptoms resolved within 24 hours. Study treatment was discontinued and the protocol was amended to require the following premedication at each SNS01-T infusion: a corticosteroid, antihistamine and acetaminophen are obligatory, plus an opioid as clinically indicated. Preliminary efficacy was explored. To date, 2 pts have shown stable disease of myeloma at week 3 with some decrease in serum and urine disease markers and one pt with DLBCL had a 15% decrease in small lymph node disease with approximately a 5 month duration. These patients were in cohorts 3 and 4. Conclusions SNS01-T administration was feasible in all 4 dose cohorts with prophylaxis for infusion reactions. Early signs of potential efficacy are encouraging. Expansion of efficacy testing to more patients and combination studies are planned. Disclosures Siegel: Senesco: PI Other. McDonald:Senesco: PI Other. Novitzky:Senesco: PI Other. Bensinger:Senesco: PI Other. Craig:Senesco: PI Other. van Rhee:Senesco: PI Other. Gutierrez:Senesco: PI Other. Libby:Senesco: PI Other. Thompson:Senesco: Consultancy, Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Bexon:Senesco: Consultancy. Barranco:Senesco: Consultancy. Taylor:Senesco: Research Funding. Dondero:Senesco: Employment. Browne:Senesco: Employment. Kurman:Senesco: Consultancy. Lust:Senesco: PI Other.

scholarly journals Interim Results from the First-in-Human Clinical Trial of Adct-402 (Loncastuximab Tesirine), a Novel Pyrrolobenzodiazepine-Based Antibody Drug Conjugate, in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 398-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Radford ◽  
Brad S. Kahl ◽  
Mehdi Hamadani ◽  
Carmelo Carlo-Stella ◽  
Paolo Caimi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents 33% of the non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) and expresses CD19, a classic B-cell marker found on B lymphocytes. ADCT-402 (loncastuximab tesirine; Lonca-T) is an antibody drug conjugate comprising a humanized antibody directed against human CD19 conjugated to a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer toxin. This first-in-human clinical study evaluated the safety and efficacy of Lonca-T in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell lineage NHL. Here we present interim results in the subgroup of pts with DLBCL. Interim efficacy and safety of Lonca-T in pts with follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma are presented in a separate abstract. Methods: Pts ≥18 years of age with R/R DLBCL who have failed or are intolerant to established therapies, or have no other treatment options available, were enrolled in this Phase 1, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study, including dose-escalation and dose-expansion parts. The primary objectives are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of Lonca-T, and determine the recommended dose(s) to use for expansion cohorts. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the clinical activity (measured by overall response rate [ORR], duration of response [DoR], progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS]), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and anti-drug antibody activity. Pts receive 1-hour intravenous infusions of Lonca-T every 3 weeks (1 cycle), with a 3+3 dose-escalation design for the dose-escalation part of the study. No intra-pt dose escalation is allowed. Results: As of June 20, 2018, 183 pts had been enrolled on the study, including 137 with DLBCL (79 male, 58 female). Pts with DLBCL had a median age of 63 years [range 20-86], and had received a median of 3 previous therapies (range 1-10; Table). Pts received doses of Lonca-T ranging from 15 to 200 µg/kg (median cycles: 2 [range 1-13]). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 136/137 (99.3%) pts, and grade ≥3 TEAEs in 100/137 (73.0%) pts. The most common all-grade TEAEs (≥20% pts), regardless of relationship to study treatment, were fatigue (57 [41.6%]), nausea (44 [32.1%], peripheral edema (44 [32.1%]), anemia (39 [28.5%]), rash (35 [25.5%]), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) increased (33 [24.1%]), constipation (30 [21.9%]), dyspnea (29 [21.2%]), and thrombocytopenia (28 [20.4%]). The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs (>10% pts) were GGT increased (21 [15.3%]), neutropenia (20 [14.6%]), neutrophil count decreased (19 [13.9%]), anemia (15 [10.9]), thrombocytopenia (15 [10.9%]) and platelet count decreased (14 [10.2%]. Approximately 66% and 72% of pts in the 120 and 150 µg/kg groups, respectively, tolerated at least 2 cycles before any AE leading to dose reduction/delay occurred. The figure depicts tumor response data. Out of 132 evaluable pts with DLBCL, the ORR was 40.2% (53/132 pts), comprising 29/132 (22.0%) complete responses (CRs) and 24/132 (18.2%) partial responses (PRs). Median DoR was 4.17 months and PFS was 2.79 months after a median follow-up of 5.13 months. Median DoR was not reached in pts achieving a CR and was 2.76 months in pts with a PR. In pts with non-bulky disease, the ORR was 44.2% (50/113 pts); 28/113 (24.8%) pts attained a CR and 22/113 (19.5%) pts attained a PR. The majority of pts (122/132) received doses ≥120 µg/kg; in these pts, the ORR was 41.8% (51/122 pts), with 28/122 (23.0%) pts attaining a CR and 23/122 (18.9%) pts attaining a PR. Conclusions: In this Phase 1 study, Lonca-T has demonstrated encouraging and durable single-agent antitumor activity and manageable toxicity in pts with R/R DLBCL at doses ≥120 µg/kg. Updated safety, tolerability, and efficacy results will be presented at the meeting. Study sponsored by ADC Therapeutics. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02669017. Disclosures Radford: Pfizer: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Equity Ownership; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding. Kahl:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Hamadani:Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; Cellerant: Consultancy; Ostuka: Research Funding; MedImmune: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding. Carlo-Stella:Boehringher Ingelheim Italia: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy; MSD Italia: Speakers Bureau; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genenta Science: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Caimi:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ardeshna:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Conference expenses, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Feingold:ADC Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. He:ADC Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Reid:AbbVie: Research Funding; Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Solh:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Chung:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Heffner:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Ungar:ADC Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. O'Connor:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study of Multiple Dosing Schedules of the Investigational Drug MLN4924, a Nedd8-Activating Enzyme Inhibitor, In Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma or Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2801-2801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatin J Shah ◽  
R. Donald Harvey ◽  
Owen A O'Connor ◽  
Andrzej J Jakubowiak ◽  
Mitchell R Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Dose Escalation Study

Abstract Abstract 2801 Background: MLN4924 is an investigational inhibitor of Nedd8-activating enzyme (NAE), which plays an essential role in regulating the activity of the cullin-RING E3 ligases (CRLs). NAE controls the neddylation cascade that results in Nedd8 conjugation to the CRLs, which is required for ligase activity. NAE inhibition thus inhibits ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of CRL substrates, which include proteins involved in cell-cycle regulation (p27), signal transduction (pIκBα), DNA replication (Cdt-1), stress response (Nrf-2), and other processes important to tumor cell growth and survival. In lymphoma cells, NAE inhibition with MLN4924 has been shown to result in apoptosis either through increased Cdt-1 levels, S-phase accumulation, and DNA re-replication, or via pIκBα stabilization and consequent NF-κB pathway inhibition. In vivo, MLN4924 treatment resulted in tumor growth inhibition and regressions in lymphoma xenograft models. This phase 1 dose-escalation study is the first investigation of MLN4924 in multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma patients. We have previously reported (Shah et al, ASH 2009) that the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MLN4924 on Schedule A of this study (days 1, 2, 8, and 9 of 21-day cycles) was 110 mg/m2, with dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) including muscle cramps and febrile neutropenia. Analyses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and skin biopsies indicated MLN4924 exerted the predicted pharmacodynamic (PD) effects in peripheral blood and skin, including inhibition of neddylated cullins and induction of pIκBα, Cdt-1, and Nrf-2. Two additional schedules of MLN4924 administration are now being investigated with the aim of increasing tolerability and the deliverable dose. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with ECOG performance status 0–2 and relapsed and/or refractory MM or lymphoma, including any B- or T-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), following ≥2 prior lines of therapy were eligible. Primary objectives were to determine the MTD and safety profile of MLN4924 on the different dosing schedules, describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) and PD of MLN4924 in blood, and investigate PD effects in skin and tumor. Secondary objectives included evaluation of disease response. Patients received MLN4924 via a 60-minute intravenous infusion on either days 1, 4, 8, and 11 (Schedule B) or days 1 and 8 (Schedule C) of 21-day cycles for up to 12 months. Doses of 25–147 mg/m2 were investigated on Schedule A; for Schedules B and C, dose escalation started at the MTD of Schedule A, 110 mg/m2, and proceeded in 1.33-fold increments using a Bayesian continual reassessment method based on the occurrence of DLTs in cycle 1. The MTD was defined as the dose level closest to that predicted to result in a DLT rate of 25%. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Results: To date, 7 patients (5 male, median age 60 years [range 48–68]) have been enrolled to Schedule B, 2 each at 110, 147, and 196, and 1 at 261 mg/m2; 2 have MM and 5 lymphoma (2 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], 1 small lymphocytic lymphoma, 1 mantle cell lymphoma [MCL], 1 nodular sclerosis HL). Patients have received a median of 3 cycles (range 2–5) to date. A total of 7 patients (all male, median age 49 years [range 45–66]) have been enrolled to Schedule C, 2 each at 110 and 147, and 3 at 196 mg/m2; 4 have MM and 3 lymphoma (1 follicular lymphoma [FL], 1 MCL, 1 nodular sclerosis HL). Median number of cycles received is 4 (range 1–7). No DLTs and no grade ≥3 AEs have been reported on either schedule to date. On Schedule B, only grade 1 dyspnea and myalgia (both n=2) have been reported in >1 patient, with grade 1 diarrhea (n=3), constipation, fatigue, and nausea (each n=2) reported on Schedule C. PK data for the 110 mg/m2 cohorts of Schedules B and C are consistent with the lack of significant accumulation of MLN4924 in plasma shown on Schedule A. One patient with HL on Schedule A achieved a partial response; no responses have been reported to date on Schedules B and C though some heavily treated patients have demonstrated stable disease for 5 or more cycles (1 FL, 7 cycles; 1 DLBCL, 5 cycles; 1 MM, 5 cycles). Conclusion: Enrollment and dose escalation are proceeding on Schedules B and C (at doses above Schedule A MTD) to determine the MTD on each schedule; updated clinical data will be presented, together with data on the PK and PD of MLN4924, on these dosing schedules. Disclosures: Shah: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Investigational agent in clinical development for the treatment of multiple myeloma and lymphoma. O'Connor:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Jakubowiak:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Centocor Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Smith:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Orlowski:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mulligan:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Smith:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Pickard:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Dezube:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lonial:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding.

PF-06939999, a potent and selective PRMT5 inhibitor, in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors: A phase 1 dose escalation study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3019-3019
Author(s):  
Jordi Rodon Ahnert ◽  
Cesar Augusto Perez ◽  
Kit Man Wong ◽  
Michael L. Maitland ◽  
Frank Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Dose Range ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Splicing Factor ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Dose Dependent

3019 Background: Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) methylates multiple substrates known to be dysregulated in cancer, including components of the spliceosome machinery. PF-06939999 is a selective small-molecule inhibitor of PRMT5. Here we report the safety, PK, PD, and preliminary activity of PF-06939999 in patients (pts) with selected advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Methods: This phase 1 dose escalation trial (NCT03854227) enrolled pts with solid tumor types marked by potential frequent splicing factor mutations, including advanced/metastatic endometrial cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), urothelial cancer, cervical cancer, or esophageal cancer. PF-06939999 monotherapy was continuously administered orally QD or BID in 28-day cycles. A Bayesian Logistic Regression Model was used to inform dose level decisions. Primary objectives were to assess dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), AEs and laboratory abnormalities. Tumor response was assessed using RECIST v1.1. PK and PD were assessed by determining PF-06939999 plasma concentration after dosing and changes in plasma levels of symmetric di-methyl arginine (SDMA), the product of PRMT5 enzymatic activity. Results: 28 pts received PF-06939999 at doses from 0.5-12 mg daily (QD or BID) during dose escalation. Median number of cycles was 2 (range, 1-13). Most were female (54%) with a median age of 61.5 (range, 32-84) y. Median number of prior therapies was 4. Overall, 4/24 (17%) pts reported DLTs: thrombocytopenia (n=2, 6 mg BID); anemia (n=1, 8 mg QD); and neutropenia (n=1, 6 mg QD). Treatment-related AEs occurred in 24 (86%) pts. Most common (≥20%) treatment-related AEs across all cycles were anemia (43%), thrombocytopenia (32%), dysgeusia, fatigue and nausea (29% each). Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs included anemia (25%), thrombocytopenia (21%), fatigue, neutropenia and lymphocyte count decreased (4% each). One pt (6mg BID) had Grade 4 treatment-related thrombocytopenia. All cytopenias were dose-dependent and reversible with dose modification. No pts discontinued treatment for treatment-related toxicity. There were no treatment-related deaths. Exposure to PF-06939999 increased with doses in the dose range tested. Plasma SDMA was reduced at steady state (58.4-87.5%), indicating robust PD target inhibition. Two pts had confirmed partial response (HNSCC and NSCLC). 6 mg QD was identified as the recommended monotherapy dose for expansion. Conclusions: PF-06939999 showed dose-dependent and manageable toxicities in this phase 1 dose escalation study. Objective tumor responses were observed in pts with HNSCC and NSCLC. Analysis of archival tissue for the presence of splicing factor mutations and other potential predictive biomarkers is ongoing. Enrollment to part 2 dose expansion is ongoing in pts with NSCLC, HNSCC and urothelial cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT03854227.

scholarly journals Final Results of Phase 1/1b Study of Tenalisib, Dual PI3K δ/γ Inhibitor in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory T-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2831-2831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swaminathan P. Iyer ◽  
Brad M. Haverkos ◽  
Jasmine Zain ◽  
Radhakrishnan Ramchandren ◽  
Mary Jo Lechowicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees

Introduction: Tenalisib (RP6530) is a novel, highly specific, dual PI3K δ/γ inhibitor with nano-molar inhibitory potency at the enzyme and cellular level. PI3K plays a critical role in T-cell development and activation and several studies have validated the PI3K-AKT pathway as a potential therapeutic target in T cell lymphomas. Preliminary results of the ongoing Phase 1/1b T-cell lymphoma (TCL) study demonstrated an acceptable safety profile with encouraging clinical activity in relapsed/refractory TCL (Oki, ASCO 2018 and Iyer, ASH 2018). We now present the final results of the study (NCT02567656). Methods: This study comprised of four-dose escalation cohorts, followed by two dose expansion cohorts at MTD enrolling 20 patients each in PTCL and CTCL cohorts. Patients had histologically confirmed TCL, ECOG PS ≤2, and had received ≥1 prior therapy. Patients received Tenalisib [200 mg BID-800 mg BID (fasting), 800 mg (fed only)] orally until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objectives were to determine the MTD and pharmacokinetic profile. The secondary objective was to evaluate overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response. Responses were evaluated for PTCL and CTCL based on IWG criteria (Cheson 2007) and mSWAT respectively. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAE v4.03. Results: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in study, 19 in dose escalation and 39 in dose expansion (28 PTCL and 30 CTCL). Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1-15). Safety assessment of 58 patients receiving at least one dose of Tenalisib demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. Treatment related Grade≥3 AEs were elevated ALT/AST (21%), rash (5%), and hypophosphatemia (3%). These events were reversible and managed by withholding study drug. Additionally, in few patients (N=9), steroids were used to manage elevated ALT/AST. There were six treatment related serious adverse events, none of these led to fatal outcome. At end of the study, four (3 CTCL; 1 PTCL) patients who completed minimum 8 cycles of therapy were rolled over to a compassionate use study (NCT03711604) and were followed up. Efficacy assessments demonstrated an ORR of 46% (3 CR and 13 PR) and clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD) of 77%. Subset efficacy analysis showed an ORR in PTCL of 47% (3 CR; 4 PR) and in CTCL of 45% (9 PR). The median time to initial response was 1.8 months and was similar in both sub-types. The overall median DOR was 4.91 months (range 0.9-26.6); in PTCL patients the DOR was 6.53 months, (range: 0.97-21.0) and 3.8 months (range: 1.67-25.67) in CTCL patients. In 3 PTCL patients who achieved CR, the median DOR was 19.5 months (range 7.5-21). Conclusion: Tenalisib demonstrated promising clinical activity and an improved safety profile in patients with relapsed/ refractory TCL. Currently, a phase I/II combination study to further evaluate safety and efficacy with romidepsin is ongoing in this target population. Disclosures Iyer: Arog: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Zain:Spectrum: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Korman:Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Glaxo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immune Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa: Research Funding; Leo: Research Funding; Menlo: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Principia: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Regeneron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Sun: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syntimmune: Research Funding; UCB: Research Funding; Valeant: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eli Lilly: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Dermira: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Routhu:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Barde:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Nair:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Huen:Galderma Inc: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline Inc: Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document