scholarly journals Phase 1 Study of Alvelestat, an Oral Neutrophil Elastase Inhibitor, in Patients with Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 18-19
Author(s):  
Annie Im ◽  
Noa G. Holtzman ◽  
Lauren M. Curtis ◽  
Laura Parsons-Wandell ◽  
Jeannette Nashed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Bronchiolitis Obliterans ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Grade 3

Introduction Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) is a rare but devastating complication of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. There is a dearth of treatment options for BOS and new strategies are needed. Airway neutrophilia is a hallmark of BOS, even in the absence of infection, and neutrophil elastase (NE) is an enzyme that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of BOS. We conducted a phase 1 study of an oral NE inhibitor, alvelestat, in patients with BOS after HCT. Methods Patients age ≥18 years with BOS and chronic GVHD after HCT were recruited to the National Cancer Institute protocol (NCT02669251). Patients had stable systemic immunosuppression and FEV1 ≥30% on pulmonary function tests (PFTs). This phase 1 study had 2 parts: 8-week intra-patient dose escalation period, followed by a continuation period that allowed for up to 6 months of treatment. Alvelestat was given orally starting at 60mg twice daily (the dose previously used in patients with chronic lung disease) and increased every 2 weeks as tolerated to 120mg twice daily, 180mg twice daily, and finally 240mg twice daily. Patients continued this dose until completion of the continuation phase, or occurrence of unacceptable toxicity, dose interruption >28 days, or progression of GVHD or BOS. Primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) based on dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary objectives included determining pharmacokinetics, markers of NE activity, and markers of inflammation in blood and sputum. PFTs and chronic GVHD evaluations were performed at baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks during the dose escalation period, and at 3 months and 6 months during the continuation period. Results Between 2016 and 2018, 7 patients were enrolled (3 men and 4 women). Median FEV1 after bronchodilator at time of enrollment was 44% (range 38-74). All 7 patients were able to tolerate dose escalation of alvelestat up to the maximum dose 240mg twice daily; MTD was not reached. The most common adverse events (AEs) that were possibly related to study treatment were all grade 2, and included increased creatinine (3 patients), ALT or AST elevation (3 patients), and upper respiratory infection (3 patients). The only grade 3 AEs that were possibly related to study drug were gastroenteritis and vomiting requiring hospitalization in 1 patient and pneumonia in 1 patient. Three patients completed the study with 8 weeks + 6 months of treatment. Four patients required dose interruptions, and only 1 of those required dose reduction for grade 3 gastroenteritis (resulting in dehydration and elevated creatinine). Four patients discontinued treatment prior to end of study: 2 patients had dose interruption of >28 days due to adverse events, 1 patient had a decline in FEV1 after pneumonia, and treatment was stopped in 1 patient due to investigator discretion. The median duration of treatment was 6.4 months. Based on NIH chronic GVHD consensus criteria, 6 patients had unchanged disease and 1 patient had progressive disease (decline in FEV1 after pneumonia). Although patients did not achieve the 10% improvement in FEV1 required for an organ response, 2 patients had improvement of 9% in FEV1 and 4 patients had improvement in the Lee chronic GVHD symptom scale lung score. Preliminary pharmacokinetic analyses of the 7 patients showed a linear dose-dependent increase in each exposure metric (steady-state trough and steady-state peak), despite some inter-patient variability. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and induced sputum samples are being analyzed for NE activity. Conclusion In this phase 1 study of the oral NE inhibitor, alvelestat, in patients with BOS after HCT, MTD was not reached and the study drug was well tolerated. Six patients had stable disease, while 1 patient had progression in the setting of pneumonia. Two patients notably had improvement in FEV1 of 9%, and 4 patients experienced improvement in symptoms. We have demonstrated that NE inhibition is well tolerated and shows a signal of stabilizing disease in patients with advanced BOS. Further study of the clinical efficacy of alvelestat in BOS after HCT is warranted, especially at an earlier stage of disease and longer duration of drug administration. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Effects of Alvelestat, an Oral Neutrophil Elastase Inhibitor, on Elevated Elastase and Collagen Turnover Biomarkers in Patients with Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1815-1815
Author(s):  
Annie Im ◽  
Jacqueline Parkin ◽  
Noa G. Holtzman ◽  
William Moore ◽  
Lauren M. Curtis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Neutrophil Elastase ◽  
Bronchiolitis Obliterans ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome ◽  
Collagen Turnover ◽  
Elastase Activity

Abstract Introduction Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) is a rare but devastating complication of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. There is a dearth of treatment options for BOS and new strategies are needed. Airway neutrophilia is a hallmark of BOS, even in the absence of infection, and neutrophil elastase (NE) is an enzyme that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of BOS. We are conducting a phase 1b study of an oral NE inhibitor, alvelestat, in patients with BOS after HCT . Biomarkers, including the elastin breakdown peptides desmosine/isodesmosine (DES/IDES), and stimulated neutrophil elastase assess direct effect on NE activity. Neo-epitope by-products of collagen type 3 and 6 synthesis (PRO-C3 and PRO-C6) and degradation (C3M and C6M) are measured as biomarkers of fibrosis/tissue modelling Methods Patients age ≥18 years with BOS and chronic GVHD after HCT were recruited to the National Cancer Institute protocol (NCT02669251). This phase 1 study had 2 parts: 8-week intra-patient dose escalation period, followed by a continuation period that allowed for up to 6 months of treatment. Alvelestat was given orally starting at 60mg twice daily, increased every 2 weeks to 120mg twice daily, 180mg twice daily, and finally 240mg twice daily. Peripheral blood samples were collected at baseline and at the end of each dose-escalation stage. Plasma DES/IDES was measured by isotopic dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (Huang et al Thorax 2012;67:502-508). Ex vivo zymosan stimulated neutrophil elastase activity was measured by ProteaseTag® immunoassay (ProAxsis Ltd, Northern Ireland). PRO-C3, PRO-C6, C3M and C6M were measured by competitive ELISA. (Nordic Biosciences, Denmark). Results are presented as Mean and Standard Error Mean (SEM). Results Between 2016 and 2018, 7 patients were enrolled (3 men and 4 women). Median FEV 1 after bronchodilator at time of enrollment was 44% predicted (range 38-74). All 7 patients were able to tolerate dose escalation of alvelestat up to the maximum dose 240mg twice daily. Preliminary clinical results were previously presented. DES/IDES was elevated at baseline (mean 0.464 (SEM 0.0508) ng/ml, with 6 of 7 subjects above the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN, 0.280 ng/ml)). Levels progressively declined during the dose escalation period to 0.380 (SEM 0.0419) ng/ml by week 8, representing a mean within subject % change from baseline (CFB) of -16.2% (SEM 6.794, Figure 1a) Ex vivo zymosan stimulated elastase activity also showed progressive decrease over the dose escalation period, with some subjects demonstrating 100% suppression (Figure 1b). Collagen synthesis as measured by PRO-C3 and PRO-C6 was increased above ULN at baseline and declined with alvelestat treatment (Figure 1c and 1d). There was no consistent change in collagen degradation biomarkers (C3M, C6M) There was consistency of a suppressive effect on biomarkers of elastase activity and collagen turnover in 6 of 7 treated patients, all of whom had improved or stable lung disease (ranging from change in FEV1 % predicted at end of treatment from +9% to -6%). Conclusion NE can damage lung tissue due to elastin breakdown, pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic effects (Sallenave J-M, J Leuk Biol 2015;98:137-139). This is the first evidence of elevated elastase activity as detected by elastin breakdown in patients with BOS and chronic GVHD. Treatment with the selective NE inhibitor, alvelestat was associated with progressive reduction of plasma desmosine levels over 8 weeks of within-subject dose escalation and reduction stimulated neutrophil elastase activity. The consistent suppression of elastase and of collagen synthesis/turnover biomarkers following alvelestat treatment is encouraging for its potential to impact progressive lung fibrosis in BOS and chronic GVHD. Disclosures Parkin: Mereo BioPharma Group: Current Employment. Moore: Mereo BioPharma Group: Current Employment. Pavletic: Center for Cancer Research: Research Funding; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; National Institutes of Health: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Actelion: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Kadmon: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase 1 study of the selective BTK inhibitor zanubrutinib in B-cell malignancies and safety and efficacy evaluation in CLL

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (11) ◽  
pp. 851-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantine S. Tam ◽  
Judith Trotman ◽  
Stephen Opat ◽  
Jan A. Burger ◽  
Gavin Cull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
B Cell Malignancies ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
End Points ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Zanubrutinib is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK). In this first-in-human, open-label, multicenter, phase 1 study, patients in part 1 (3 + 3 dose escalation) had relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies and received zanubrutinib 40, 80, 160, or 320 mg once daily or 160 mg twice daily. Part 2 (expansion) consisted of disease-specific cohorts, including treatment-naive or relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). The primary end points were safety and tolerability, and definition of the maximum tolerated dose (part 1). Additional end points included pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and preliminary efficacy. Reported herein are results from 144 patients enrolled in the dose-finding and CLL/SLL cohorts. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred in dose escalation. Median BTK occupancy in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was >95% at all doses. Sustained complete (>95%) BTK occupancy in lymph node biopsy specimens was more frequent with 160 mg twice daily than 320 mg once daily (89% vs 50%; P = .0342). Consequently, 160 mg twice daily was selected for further investigation. With median follow-up of 13.7 months (range, 0.4-30.5 months), 89 CLL/SLL patients (94.7%) remain on study. Most toxicities were grade 1/2; neutropenia was the only grade 3/4 toxicity observed in >2 patients. One patient experienced a grade 3 subcutaneous hemorrhage. Among 78 efficacy-evaluable CLL/SLL patients, the overall response rate was 96.2% (95% confidence interval, 89.2-99.2). Estimated progression-free survival at 12 months was 100%. Zanubrutinib demonstrated encouraging activity in CLL/SLL patients, with a low incidence of major toxicities. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02343120.

ARRY-520 Shows Durable Responses in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in a Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1860-1860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatin J Shah ◽  
Jeffrey Zonder ◽  
Adam Cohen ◽  
Robert Z. Orlowski ◽  
Raymond Alexanian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Acceptable Safety Profile ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1860 Background: ARRY-520 is a potent, selective inhibitor of kinesin spindle protein (KSP, eg5) which is required for cell cycle progression through mitosis. Treatment with ARRY-520 arrests cells in mitosis with subsequent induction of apoptosis due to degradation of survival signals during mitotic arrest. Cancers, such as multiple myeloma (MM), that depend on the short-lived survival protein Myeloid cell leukemia (MCL)-1 are highly sensitive to treatment with ARRY-520 in preclinical MM models, providing a strong rationale for its clinical investigation in this disease. Methods: This Phase 1 study was designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), preliminary efficacy and biological activity of ARRY-520 administered intravenously on Days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks without/with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. Eligible patients (pts) had relapsed or refractory MM with ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy (including both bortezomib [BTZ] and an immunomodulatory [IMiD] agent), unless refusing or ineligible for this therapy. Cohorts were enrolled in a classical 3+3 dose escalation design. Results: Enrollment in this Phase 1 study is complete. Thirty-one pts have been treated, with a median age of 60 years (range 43–79) and a median of 6 prior regimens (range 2–16). All pts received a prior proteasome inhibitor (30 pts BTZ, 4 pts carfilzomib) and an IMiD-based agent (28 pts lenalidomide, 23 pts thalidomide). Twenty-four pts had an autologous stem cell transplant. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 1.25 mg/m2/day without G-CSF. As neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), dose escalation with G-CSF support was conducted and the MTD for ARRY-520 with G-CSF was determined to be 1.5 mg/m2/day. At the MTD, 1 of 7 pts had a DLT of febrile neutropenia. At doses above the MTD, additional DLTs of Grade 3 mucositis and Grade 3 corneal disorder were observed. ARRY-520 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events (AEs) included hematologic events (anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia), as well as anorexia, blurred vision, diarrhea, dizziness, fatigue, febrile neutropenia, mucositis, nausea and rash. No treatment-related AEs of neuropathy or alopecia were reported at the MTD. ARRY-520 has been dosed over extended periods of time (to date, median 7 cycles [range 1–44]), with no evidence of cumulative toxicity. The plasma concentrations of ARRY-520 were determined over a 7-day period during Cycle 1 following the Day 1 and 2 infusions of ARRY-520. The preliminary noncompartmental PK parameter estimates in this population were similar to those observed in prior oncology studies. The PK was characterized by low clearance (CL = 2.2 L/hr/m2) and a large volume of distribution (Vss = 232 L/m2). The t1/2 of elimination was very long (67 hrs). Concentrations were typically maintained above the in vitro IC50 for KSP inhibition for ≥ 7 days suggesting therapeutically active concentrations of drug were maintained in pts for sustained periods. Further analyses of PK relative to safety and activity are on-going. ARRY-520 showed activity as a single agent across a range of doses in this heavily pretreated population (31 evaluable pts) with 3 confirmed partial responses (PR) and 1 confirmed minimal response (MR) per International Melanoma Working Group (IMWG) and European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EMBT) criteria. PRs had a median of 7 prior therapies (range 2–8). Responses were durable; to date, the durations of responses for PRs were 3.4+ months (mos), 11.9+ mos and 12.0 mos, respectively. Of interest, the time to response with ARRY-520 was prolonged, with a median time to PR of 3.7 mos (range 3.7–8.1). Notably, responses were observed in pts refractory to multiple standard-of-care agents. In addition, 4 pts experienced a best response of stable disease (SD) lasting ≥ 10 mos. To date, 5 pts remain on study, including 2 of 3 PRs. Conclusions: In this Phase 1 study, ARRY-520 shows promising evidence of clinical activity, with a long duration of response and an acceptable safety profile in heavily pretreated MM Patients. A Phase 2 portion of the study is ongoing to obtain additional information on the efficacy, safety and biological effects of ARRY-520 at 1.5 mg/m2/day with G-CSF support. Disclosures: Shah: Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: ARRY-520. Zonder:Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Medtronics: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy. Cohen:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria. Orlowski:Array BioPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alexanian:Array BioPharma: Research Funding. Thomas:Array BioPharma: Research Funding; Centecor: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding. Weber:Array BioPharma: Research Funding. Kaufman:Keryx: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Walker:Array BioPharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Litwiler:Array BioPharma: Employment. Karan:Array BioPharma: Employment. Hilder:a: Employment. Ptaszynski:Array BioPharma Inc.: Consultancy. Lonial:Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy.

A Phase I Open-Label, Multi-Dose Escalation Study of the Dual Syk/Jak Inhibitor PRT062070 (Cerdulatinib) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B Cell Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3103-3103
Author(s):  
Manish Patel ◽  
Paul Hamlin ◽  
Donald K Strickland ◽  
Anjali Pandey ◽  
Greg Coffey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Markers Of Inflammation ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Preclinical studies of the Syk-mediated B-cell receptor pathway and Jak-mediated cytokine pathways have demonstrated a potential therapeutic advantage for the dual inhibition of both Syk and Jak kinases in the treatment of B-cell malignancies. Cerdulatinib (PRT062070) was identified from a chemistry screen as a potent and selective inhibitor of Syk, Jak1, Jak3, and Tyk2, with minimal activity against Jak2. Cerdulatinib is efficacious in rodent models of B-cell lymphoma and autoimmune disease (Coffey et al., ASH 2012) and has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in genetically diverse B-cell lymphoma cell lines that is greater than that of Syk- or Jak- selective inhibitors alone (Ma et al., ASH 2013). Methods: This Phase 1 3+3 dose escalation study is evaluating cerdulatinib, given continuously on either a once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) schedule, for relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cerdulatinib in patients with CLL or NHL. Secondary objectives are to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of cerdulatinib and to make a preliminary assessment of antitumor activity. Toxicity is graded according to the National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v4. Clinical response is evaluated according to published criteria (Hallek et al., Blood 2008:111:5446-5456; Cheson et al., J. Clin. Oncol. 2012: 25:579-586). The level of inhibition of Syk and Jak is determined using a variety of whole blood assays measuring signaling via receptors for the B-cell antigen, IL2, IL4, IL6, and GM-CSF. Serum markers of tumor burden, including CCL3, CCL4, and other markers of inflammation, are also being measured. Results: As of 4 August 2014, twelve patients have been enrolled in once daily dose cohorts of 15 mg QD, 30 mg QD, and 45 mg QD. No dose-limiting toxicities have been reported. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), regardless of causality, were: Grade 3 anemia (n=1), Grade 3 neutropenia (n=1), Grade 3 fatigue (n=1), Grade 3 hypotension (n=1), Grade 3 AST increased (n=1), Grade 3 hematochezia (n=1), and Grade 5 Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP; n=1). The patient who experienced PCP pneumonia was a 76 year old male with CLL who had received prior therapy with bendamustine and rituximab. Cerdulatinib is well-absorbed with an average terminal elimination half-life at steady state of 14 hours. Selective inhibition of Syk and Jak in whole blood assays was observed post-treatment, with IC25-IC50 (Cmin to Cmax at steady-state) against these targets achieved at the 15 mg dose level, and IC50-IC80 (Cmin to Cmax at steady-state) achieved at the 30 mg and 45 mg doses. Reductions of >50% in serum markers of inflammation, as well as in CCL3 and CCL4, were noted at all dose levels post-treatment. Two patients treated at the 15 mg dose (1 CLL, 1 follicular lymphoma [FL]) remained on study for >230 and >200 days, respectively, with stable disease (SD) prior to disease progression. One patient treated at the 30 mg dose (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], who did not respond to prior R-CHOP therapy), remained on study with SD for 140 days. One patient treated at the 30 mg dose (CLL) experienced a >60% decrease in peripheral lymphocyte count prior to coming off study for PCP pneumonia. Another patient treated at the 30 mg dose (CLL) experienced early lymphocytosis and a 33% reduction in lymph node size at the end of Cycle 2 and remains on study in Cycle 3. One patient treated at the 45 mg dose (FL) experienced a 40% decrease in lymph node size at the end of Cycle 4 and remains on study in Cycle 5. Conclusions: Cerdulatinib has been well tolerated in the initial cohorts of this Phase 1 study, with no dose-limiting toxicities and preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity. Dose escalation continues and Phase 2 expansion cohorts are planned in CLL, DLBCL and FL. Disclosures Hamlin: Gilead, Spectrum, Seattle Genetics, Genentech: Consultancy; Spectrum, GSK, Jansen and Jansen/Pharmacyclics, Portola, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Strickland:SCRI Development Innovations: Employment. Pandey:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment; Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Equity Ownership. Coffey:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Leeds:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Levy:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Employment; University of Michigan: Patents & Royalties. Curnutte:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership; Sea Lane Biotechnologies: Consultancy; 3-V Biosciences: Equity Ownership. Wagner-Johnston:Gilead: Consultancy; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding. Flinn:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding.

A dose escalation phase 1 study of radiotherapy (RT) in combination with anti-cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibody ipilimumab in patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9549-9549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celine Boutros ◽  
Christine Mateus ◽  
Emilie Lanoy ◽  
Emilie Routier ◽  
Salem Chouaib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Grade 3

9549 Background: Preclinical findings have shown a synergy between RT and anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody in several tumor animal models for both local tumor control and distant effects. Preliminary clinical data suggest that it could be due to an abscopal effect of RT. The Mel-Ipi-Rx phase 1 study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of RT combined with ipilimumab in pts with metastatic melanoma. Methods: A 3+3 dose escalation design was used with 9, 15, 18 and 24 Gy dose of RT (in 3 fractions) at week 4 combined with 10 mg/kg ipilimumab (every 3 weeks for 4 doses). Pts with evidence of clinical benefit at week 12 were eligible for maintenance ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg every 12 weeks starting at week 24 until severe toxicity or disease progression based on immune-related response criteria (irRC). Results: 19 pts with advanced melanoma received ipilimumab between August 2011 and July 2015. Nine pts received the 4 doses of ipilimumab and 2 pts received maintenance ipilimumab (1 and 2 cycles respectively). All pts received the combined RT at week 4 in 3 fractions. All pts presented at least one AE of any grade. The most common AEs were asthenia, diarrhea, desease-related pain and fever. Grade 3 AEs occurred in 8 pts. They included colitis (n = 3), hepatitis (n = 2), anemia (n = 2), asthenia (n = 1), thyroid disorders (n = 1) and nausea/vomiting (n = 1). Nine pts discontinued the study owing to treatment-related adverse events including colitis (n = 6), hepatitis (n = 2) and DRESS (Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and systemic syndrome) (n = 1). DLT occurred in 2/6 pts in the cohort receiving 15 Gy. No drug-related death occurred. According to irRC, 4 partial responses (ORR: 21%) and 4 stable diseases were observed at week 24. The MTD was 9 Gy dose. One pt out of 12 treated in the 9 Gy cohort presented a DLT (grade 3 colitis). The median progression-free survival [95% CI] was 7.2 months [2.4 – 16.8]. The median overall survival [95% CI] was 14.4 months [7.2 – 20.4]. Conclusions: When combined with ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg, in the present design, the MTD of RT was 9 Gy. This combination appears to be associated with antitumor activity. Clinical trial information: 2010-020317-93.

Phase 1 study of MK-4166, an anti-human glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor (GITR) antibody, as monotherapy or with pembrolizumab (pembro) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9509-9509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽  
Karen A. Autio ◽  
Talia Golan ◽  
Konstantin Dobrenkov ◽  
Elliot Chartash ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Drug Disposition ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Phase 1 Study

9509 Background: Ligation of GITR on immune cells decreases Treg-mediated suppression and enhances T cell proliferation. MK-4166 is a humanized IgG1 agonist monoclonal antibody targeting GITR. Data from the first-in-human phase 1 study (NCT02132754) of MK-4166 as monotherapy (mono) or in combination with pembro (combo) are presented. Methods: MK-4166 was tested alone (0.0015 mg IV-900 mg Q3W ×4 doses) or with pembro (fixed dose 200 mg IV Q3W up to 35 doses) in the absence of toxicity or progression. Study included a dose escalation/confirmation cohort (metastatic solid tumors) and an expansion cohort (treatment-naive and pretreated melanoma). A T cell–inflamed gene expression profile (GEP) was assessed using RNA from baseline tumor samples. End points – primary: safety/tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MK-4166; secondary: pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD); exploratory: objective response rate (ORR) per irRECIST1.1. Results: Of 113 pts, 48 received mono and 65 combo; 20 were in the melanoma expansion. Common AEs ( > 20%) were fatigue, infusion-related reaction, nausea, abdominal pain, and pruritus; 43 pts had grade ≥3 AEs (38.1%); 6 (5.3%) were treatment-related. One dose-limiting toxicity (bladder perforation in a urothelial pt with a neobladder) possibly related to study drug was observed with mono. MTD was not reached. No treatment-related deaths were observed. MK-4166 PK/PD showed target-mediated drug disposition concomitant with decreased GITR availability on T cells in blood with increasing doses. Four objective responses (4/45; ORR, 9%) were seen with combo in dose escalation. For ICI-naive melanoma pts (n = 13) in expansion, ORR was 69% (95% CI, 38-91), including 4 CRs and 5 PRs. No response was observed in 7 pts previously treated with ICI. High ORRs were observed in noninflamed and inflamed ICI-naive melanoma pts. Conclusions: MK-4166 at a dose up to 900 mg as monotherapy and in combination with pembro was well tolerated, with dose-related evidence of target engagement. Responses were observed with MK-4166 900 mg plus pembro, particularly in pts with melanoma naive to ICIs. Clinical trial information: NCT02132754.

Safety and tolerability of oxaliplatin based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: A phase I dose-finding study in Asian patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 360-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raghav Sundar ◽  
Guo Wei Kim ◽  
Hon Lyn Tan ◽  
Lingzhi Wang ◽  
Koy Min Chue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Dose Cohort ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Delivery Technique ◽  
Grade 3

360 Background: PIPAC is a novel, laparoscopic intraperitoneal chemotherapy delivery technique which aims to improve on hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), ameliorating drug distribution and tissue penetration. Thus far, PIPAC has been conducted with oxaliplatin chemotherapy in Europe, at an arbitrary dose of 92mg/m2; 150mg/m2 was found to be intolerable. We conducted a dose-escalation phase 1 study to establish the safety, tolerability and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for PIPAC in Asian patients. Methods: This phase 1 study of oxaliplatin administered via PIPAC was designed as a traditional 3+3 dose escalation study for patients with predominant peritoneal metastasis from a gastrointestinal primary tumor, after failure of standard therapies. Dose levels were planned at 45, 60, 90 and 120mg/m2. Repeat doses of PIPAC were permitted, 6 weeks apart. Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were defined as any clinically relevant grade 3 adverse events occurring within 28 days after PIPAC. Results: This study included 16 patients (25 PIPAC procedures; 8 gastric, 4 colorectal and 1 gallbladder, pancreas and appendix cancer each). Median age was 62 years, with a median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) score of 17 (range 1 - 39). Two patients developed pancreatitis (grade 2 and 3) on day 6 and day 9 after PIPAC administration at the dose cohort of 45mg/m2, necessitating cohort expansion to 6 patients. One patient was noted to have asymptomatic grade 3 hyperamylasemia (90mg/m2 cohort). There were no other DLTs and all 3 patients in the highest dose cohort (120mg/m2) tolerated PIPAC well. Nine patients who underwent a 2nd PIPAC procedure had a decrease in PCI score from 18.4 to 15.5; one patient at 120mg/m2 had an improvement in PCI from 30 to 12. Conclusions: The RP2D of PIPAC with oxaliplatin is 120mg/m2. Single agent PIPAC is well tolerated, and future studies with PIPAC must consider a bi-directional approach with the incorporation of systemic therapy, with either chemotherapy or immunotherapy to improve efficacy. Clinical trial information: NCT03172416.

scholarly journals Phase 1 Study of the IDH1m Inhibitor FT-2102 As a Single Agent in Patients with IDH1m Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1453-1453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Watts ◽  
Maria R. Baer ◽  
Jay Yang ◽  
Shira Dinner ◽  
Sangmin Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Human Tissue ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations (IDH1m) occur in 7-14% of AML patients and 3% of MDS patients and produce 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), an oncometabolite that impairs differentiation. FT-2102 is an oral, highly potent, selective small molecule inhibitor of mutated IDH1, with the therapeutic potential to restore normal cellular differentiation. Herein, we present preclinical and clinical data from an ongoing Phase 1/2 study of single-agent (SA) FT-2102 in patients with IDH1m AML and MDS (CT.gov: NCT02719574). Methods: Extensive pre-clinical evaluations were performed on FT-2102, including CYP interactions in-vivo in rat and in-vitro in human tissue and in-vivo QTc toxicology in monkeys. The clinical Phase 1 study was initiated to evaluate the safety, PK/PD, and antileukemic activity of FT-2102 in patients with IDH1m AML or MDS and included both dose escalation and expansion phases. FT-2102 was administered daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Eligibility criteria included: IDH1m AML/MDS [relapsed/refractory (R/R) or treatment naïve (TN) for whom standard therapy was contraindicated], adequate liver and renal function, no prior IDH1 inhibitors, and no restrictions for concomitant non-anticancer medications. Investigator-assessed responses were per modified IWG 2003/2006 criteria. Efficacy was assessed at Cycle 2 Day 1 and as clinically indicated thereafter. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed throughout the study per NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Results: Evaluation of FT-2102 in in-vivo rat and in-vitro human tissue indicated hepatic metabolism by CYP enzymes (CPY3A4, 2C9, 1A1) as the major route of excretion. Animal toxicology studies predicted the threshold for QTc risk occurred at exposures >5.5 fold higher than the murine exposure at which 90% 2-HG reduction was observed. In the clinical study, at the time of the data cutoff, 31 patients (pts) had been treated with SA FT-2102, with a median of 3 mo. on treatment (range: 0.2 to 20 mo.). Of the 31pts treated, 25 had AML (22 R/R; 3 TN) and 6 had MDS (4 R/R; 2 TN). The median number of prior anti-leukemia therapies was 2 (range: 0-9) for AML pts and 1 (range: 0-4) for MDS pts. FT-2102 doses were: 150 mg QD (n=8), 300 mg QD (n=4), 150 mg BID (n=16), and 100 mg QD with food (n=3). Eighteen pts discontinued treatment, most commonly due to death (n=5), progressive disease (n=5), HSCT (n=3), or lack of response (n=3). Severe (≥Grade 3) AEs occurring in >5% of pts included thrombocytopenia (26%), febrile neutropenia (23%), anemia (19%), pneumonia (13%), neutropenia (7%), hypokalemia (7%), pyrexia (7%) and leukocytosis (6%). Three pts had differentiation syndrome (IDH-DS), which resolved with temporary interruption of FT-2102, treatment with dexamethasone, hydroxyurea, and supportive care in all three. One pt had transient QTcF prolongation (Grade 3) which resolved with temporary interruption of FT-2102 and cessation of suspected concomitant medications. Eight pts died on treatment or within 28 days of the last dose, with no deaths considered related to FT-2102. No DLTs were observed during dose escalation. Selection of FT-2102 150 mg BID as the RP2D was supported by PK and PD data. Durable steady-state (Css) achieved by Week 2 was well below the threshold for QTc risk predicted by preclinical studies. The predicted IC90 was confirmed with prompt and durable 2-HG reduction to normal levels by C2D1 at the RP2D. Table 1 shows the Investigator-assessed ORR per IWG. Responses have been observed from 1 to 6 months on treatment, with stable disease observed beyond 6 months; 42% of the patients remain on treatment. Conclusions: FT-2102 preclinical evaluations suggest a low risk of clinically significant CYP-mediated drug-drug interaction and QTc prolongation. SA FT-2102 is well tolerated in AML and MDS, with 150 mg BID selected as the RP2D based on safety, PK and PD (2-HG) response. Significant clinical activity has been observed in heavily pre-treated and in TN patients, both in AML and MDS. FT-2102 continues being investigated at a dose of 150 mg BID in a Phase 2 study. Three SA Phase 2 cohorts are currently open for enrollment in R/R AML, AML/MDS with CR/CRi (i.e., with MRD), and in pts with R/R MDS/AML with prior exposure to an IDH1m inhibitor. Data updates will be available at the time of presentation. Disclosures Lee: LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Clinipace: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Schiller:Celator/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Ferrell:Incyte: Research Funding. Kelly:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Li:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Sweeney:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Watson:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Mohamed:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Cortes:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Repurposing Leflunomide for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Final Analysis of a Phase 1 Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2007-2007
Author(s):  
Michael Rosenzweig ◽  
Joycelynne Palmer ◽  
Ni-Chun Tsai ◽  
Ralf Buettner ◽  
Lupe Duarte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Phase 1 Study

Abstract Introduction: Despite significant progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), the disease remains incurable and typically follows a pattern of multiple responses and relapses. In the relapsed/refractory MM setting (RRMM), outcomes for patients may be particularly discouraging. New treatments that are safe and effective are therefore of urgent need for this population. Since its FDA approval in 1998 for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, leflunomide has been used in over 300,000 patients worldwide. Leflunomide is hepatically cleared and has a favorable toxicity profile even when given over long periods. Its primary mechanism of action is inhibition of pyrimidine synthesis by targeting dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, thus achieving anti-proliferative effects on B and T lymphocytes. The anti-neoplastic potential of this agent has been studied in a number of pre-clinical tumor models. Leflunomide's immunoregulatory action may be related to functional inhibition of CD4+ effector T cells, including Th17 cells as well as dysregulation of T regulatory cells (Tregs). We found that leflunomide-treated C57BL/KaLwRij mice engrafted with 5TGM1 cells had more robust expansion of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells and subsequent decrease of CD4+ Tregs compared to untreated mice. We have also noted that leflunomide impairs growth of MM cells at least partly through inhibition of PIM kinases and c-Myc signaling. We present here final results from a phase 1 study of leflunomide in patients with RRMM. Methods: This single center, single agent, phase 1 dose-escalation trial was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of leflunomide in patients with RRMM. The trial implemented a modified rolling six phase 1 dose escalation design. The primary objectives were as follows: 1) to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose of leflunomide; 2) to assess the safety and tolerably of leflunomide at each dose level by evaluation of toxicities. Leflunomide was administered at a loading dose of 100 mg daily for the first three days, then daily in 28-day cycles. The starting dose of daily leflunomide was 20 mg daily, with dose escalation in increments of 20 mg/day, up to 60 mg/day. Dose de-escalation in decrements of 10mg/day was planned. Results: A total of 12 patients have been enrolled starting in December 2015 and treated. The median age is 68 (range 48 - 85), and the median number of prior therapies is 5 (range: 3 - 14). Nine patients had prior autologous stem cell transplant. Double refractory (lenalidomide/bortezomib) disease was noted in 9 patients. High-risk cytogenetics were observed in 5 patients including 2 patients with del17p. All 12 subjects were evaluable for toxicity. One subject was not evaluable for response because of non-compliance. Of the eleven patients evaluable for response, the median number of cycles was 3 (range 1- 15). The median follow up was 177 days (range: 42 - 602). Three patients were treated on DL 1 (20 mg) and three on DL3 (40 mg) without incidence of DLT. At DL5 (60 mg), one patient had a DLT with grade III elevation of alanine aminotransferase; an additional three patients were enrolled at this dose level without further DLTs. One out of 12 subjects remains on treatment, 8 patients were removed from study due to disease progression, two due to adverse events (bacteremia at 60 mg, possibly related to study drug and angioedema at 40 mg, not related to study drug) and one from noncompliance. The most common toxicities were hematologic. There were 4 patients with grade 1 or 2 neutropenia on the 20 and 40 mg dose levels and 1 patient with grade 4 lymphopenia on the 40 mg dose. Except for the DLT, all non-hematologic toxicities were ≤ grade 2. Response: Although not all patients were treated at the 60 mg dose, a clinical benefit rate of 90% has been seen, with 9/10 achieving stable disease (SD). The median duration of SD among 9 patients thus far is 56 days (range: 27-401). In the five evaluable patients with high risk cytogenetics, four of them achieved a clinical benefit. Two subjects had SD lasting nearly one year or longer. In this small cohort, no association between dose and benefit was observed. Conclusion: Leflunomide is a safe and well-tolerated oral option for patients with RRMM, with a clinical benefit from single agent dosing. On the basis of our preclinical work showing synergistic inhibition of MM using leflunomide, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone, we plan clinical testing of this drug combination. Disclosures Rosenzweig: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Krishnan:Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sutro: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Speakers Bureau. Forman:Mustang Therapeutics: Other: Licensing Agreement, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Results of a Phase 1 Study of Quizartinib (AC220) As Maintenance Therapy in Subjects with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 428-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda M. Sandmaier ◽  
Samer K Khaled ◽  
Betul Oran ◽  
Guy Gammon ◽  
Denise Trone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are associated with early relapse after standard chemotherapy and poor survival. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a recommended treatment for patients with FLT3-ITD(+) AML. However, a high rate of relapse after a HCT is observed when compared to FLT3-ITD(-) patients with the 2 year relapse rate of 30% vs. 16% in FLT3-ITD(+) and FLT3-ITD(-) patients, respectively (Brunet, J. Clin. Oncol. 2012). Quizartinib (AC220) is an oral FLT3 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has shown a high level of single agent activity in nearly 500 patients with FLT3(+) relapsed or refractory AML and is currently in a Phase 3 study. This Phase 1 study examined maintenance therapy with quizartinib in AML patients (aged 18 years or older) in remission after receipt of an allogeneic HCT. Dose escalation was conducted using a modified 3+3 design, where 6 subjects were enrolled at each dose level. Two dose levels were tested; dose level 1 (DL1) at 40 mg and dose level 2 (DL2) at 60 mg given daily in continuous 28 day cycles. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed for the first 2 cycles and subjects were allowed to continue up to a maximum of 24 cycles. Thirteen subjects were recruited and enrollment was completed in June 2013. The median age was 43 (range 23 to 61) years. All subjects had received an HLA-matched allogeneic HCT (3 related and 10 unrelated) a median of 56 (range 41 – 70) days before study enrollment. All subjects were positive for the FLT3-ITD mutation by local testing at the time of diagnosis. Seven subjects were enrolled at DL1, including one who relapsed after 22 days on study and was replaced per protocol as deemed not evaluable for DLTs. There was 1 DLT of Grade 3 gastric hemorrhage which resolved and the subject was able to continue on a reduced dose (30 mg) of quizartinib. Six subjects were enrolled at DL2, including one subject who experienced 1 DLT of Grade 3 anemia but was able to continue on a reduced dose (30 mg). Of the 13 total subjects, 10 (77%) received quizartinib for more than a year. Six (45%) subjects are continuing to receive quizartinib currently (15, 16, 18, 18, 23, and 23 cycles) and 2 (15%) subjects have completed 24 cycles. Three subjects (23%) discontinued due to AE: Grade 4 neutropenia (Cycle 4), Grade 2 corneal epithelium defect (Cycle 9), and Grade 3 autoimmune hemolysis (Cycle 15); 1(8%) discontinued for disease relapse (Cycle 1) and 1 (8%) for protocol non-compliance (Cycle 13). The most common (≥20%) treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (38%; 5 subjects), neutropenia (31%; 4 subjects), nausea (23%; 3 subjects) and leukopenia (23%; 3 subjects). This is the first study conducted to determine whether or not quizartinib can be safely administered as post-transplant maintenance therapy in patients with AML. The data from this study support the use of post-transplant maintenance therapy with quizartinib and show early evidence indicating a reduced relapse rate with only 1 relapse reported out of 13 subjects, which compares favorably to historical reference data. No MTD was identified but 60 mg daily was selected as the highest dose for continuous daily administration based on Phase 2 study data in relapsed or refractory subjects (J Cortes, Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2013 [Abstract]). Quizartinib maintenance has been included in the current Phase 3 QUANTUM-R study comparing quizartinib vs. salvage chemotherapy in relapsed or refractory FLT3-ITD(+) AML. Disclosures Sandmaier: Astellas Pharma, Inc: Research Funding; Ambit Bioscience Corporation: Research Funding. Khaled:Ambit Bioscience Corporation: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma, Inc: Research Funding. Oran:Astellas Pharma, Inc: Research Funding; Ambit Bioscience Corporation: Research Funding. Gammon:Ambit Bioscience Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trone:Ambit Bioscience Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Frankfurt:Astellas Pharma, Inc: Research Funding; Ambit Bioscience Corporation: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document