scholarly journals Assessment of 1112 Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients According to Age and Year of Diagnosis at a Referral Cancer Center

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 29-30
Author(s):  
Jule F Vasquez ◽  
Edgar Diaz ◽  
Ebert Poquioma

Background Multiple Myeloma is the second more frequent hematological malignancy with a median age at diagnosis of 65 years old. However, this data is mainly of European countries and the United State of America. (1) The age is an important variable because the vast majority of cancer center use 65-70 years old as the cutoff for autologous transplantation. Two third of patients are considered not eligible for autologous transplant. The percentage of patients diagnosed at young age (<40 years) is relatively rare (2,2%)(1, 2) and even more rare is before 30 years (0.3%)(3). It is not available solid information of Latin American MM patients. The objective of this study was to determine the age at diagnosis according to the last 19 years. Also, to define the percentage of MM patients in a 5-year interval range of age. Methods We reviewed the database of the Department of Epidemiology at the National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases from 2000 to 2018 in Lima, Peru. We included all patients with Multiple Myeloma. Stratification was made based of age group, year of diagnosis and eligibility for hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Tables of relative and accumulative frequency were made. Results We found 1112 patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM), with a median age of 61 years and an average of 60.2 years. Male patients were 59% for the entire cohort. Patients under 40 years of age represented 4.6% (51), of which 72% (37) were male. Those under 30 years old were 0.9% (10%) of all cases of which 90% were male. Patients eligible for transplant were 63% in total, with a median age of 55 years, and the non-eligible group had a median age of 71 years. The median age for each year from 2000 to 2018 was 61 with a range of 56 to 65 years old (peak in 2010) with an oscillating trend, however with a slight downward slope. The median age from 2000 to 2008 was 61 and from 2009 to 2018 was 60 years. The most frequent affect group was 60 to 64 years (16.5%), nevertheless, in the last 10 years the age group of 55-59 was the most affected 16.05% vs 15.34%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study shows that NDMM patients in Peru have a lower median age compared to European or American countries with a tendency to have younger MM patients. In addition to having a higher percentage (4.6% vs 2%) of patients under 40 years old and 30 years old (0.9% vs 0.3%). This significantly younger population and specially those under 40 years of age deserve a comprehensive evaluation to determine if this impact their prognosis and survival. References 1. Kyle RA, Gertz MA, Witzig TE, Lust JA, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, et al. Review of 1027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78(1):21-33. 2. Blade J, Kyle RA, Greipp PR. Presenting features and prognosis in 72 patients with multiple myeloma who were younger than 40 years. Br J Haematol. 1996;93(2):345-51. 3. Blade J, Kyle RA, Greipp PR. Multiple myeloma in patients younger than 30 years. Report of 10 cases and review of the literature. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(13):1463-8. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4085-4085
Author(s):  
Megan B Sears-Smith ◽  
Lillian Charboneau ◽  
Renju Raj ◽  
R. Eric Heidel

Abstract Introduction: Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is considered standard of care in young and fit patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. ASCT has shown to improve depth of response, progression free survival and overall survival compared to systemic therapy alone in myeloma patients (Harousseau et al. New England Journal of Medicine). Proximity to a stem cell transplant center may influence the utilization of this therapeutic option in transplant eligible multiple myeloma patients. Our cancer center did not have a stem cell transplant program in the 100-mile driving radius. The goal of this study was to assess the referral patterns and utilization of ASCT in newly diagnosed, young (age <65 years) multiple myeloma patients in a setting where patients are lacking proximity to a transplant center. Methods: The study was an IRB-approved retrospective cohort study. Patients between 18 and 65 years of age at the time of diagnosis who were diagnosed with multiple myeloma between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020, were included. Data including age at diagnosis, sex, race, zip code, treatment regimen, clinical data-including referral to a transplant center, stem cell collection and transplant-were collected and analyzed. Staging was calculated using lab values at the time of diagnosis or within 2 weeks of starting treatment. Date of diagnosis was defined as the date of bone marrow biopsy confirming systemic disease. All frequency and descriptive analyses were performed using SPSS Version 26 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) Results: There were n = 62 patients that met the study inclusion criteria. Patients were mainly white (86%) and male (58%) with an average age at diagnosis of 55.9 (SD = 6.83) years. All patients (n = 62, 100%) lived at zip codes that were more than 100 miles from the closest transplant center. ISS staging showed 37% (n = 23, 95% CI 25% - 50%), 29% (n = 18, 95% CI 18% - 42%), and 18% (n = 11, 95% CI 9% - 30%) to have stage I, II, and III disease respectively. Twelve patients (n = 12, 19.4%, 95% CI 10.4% - 31.4%) had insufficient data for staging. The most common first line regimens were bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (n = 39, 62.9%, 95% CI 49.7% - 74.8%) and bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (n = 13, 21%, 95% CI 11.7% - 33.2%). Most patients (n = 48, 77.4%, 95% CI 65% - 87.1%) achieved a very good partial response or better. Eight (n = 8, 13%, 95% CI 5.7% - 23.9%) patients had refractory disease to first line therapy. Forty-six (n = 46, 74%, 95% CI 62% - 85%) patients were referred for HSCT evaluation, n = 16 (26%, 95% CI 15.5% - 38.5%) patients were not. Of the forty-six (n = 46) patients that were referred, n = 44 (96%, 95% CI 85% - 99.5%) patients had a clinical consultation with the transplant team. Of the entire cohort, n = 36 (58%, 95% CI 44.9% - 70.5%) patients underwent stem cell collection and n = 34 (55%, 95% CI 42% - 68%) patients underwent an ASCT after induction therapy. Conclusions: Our study found that more than one third of young patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma did not undergo stem cell collection or stem cell transplant. Lack of geographic access to a transplant center may be a contributing factor to the under utilization of this highly effective therapeutic strategy. Further investigation into interventions to improve ASCT referral and completion rates is imperative for improving outcomes for patients in such geographic locations. Disclosures Raj: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Glaxo-Smith Kline: Speakers Bureau.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5832-5832
Author(s):  
Prajwol Pathak ◽  
Athira Unnikrishnan ◽  
Fei Zou ◽  
Helen Leather ◽  
Christopher R. Cogle ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: High dose melphalan followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the standard of care in eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts). It is common practice to collect sufficient stem cells for two transplants, for the first ASCT immediately after induction, and for salvage ASCT following disease progression. We investigated the frequency of salvage second ASCT in the era of novel agents to determine if there has been a change in practice. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of MM pts who had stem cells collected for two ASCTs from 03/1996 to 12/2014. We then compared pts who received their first ASCT prior to January 2007 to those after this time. We excluded pts who received their second transplant as part of a clinical protocol, who received subsequent allogenic transplants, and pts who received 2 ASCT transplants as part of initial therapy. Fisher's exact test was used to assess significance of categorical independent variables and t-test was used to assess significance of continuous variables. Results: Forty of 506 pts (7.9%) received salvage second ASCT (Fig 1). Among 195 MM pts who received their first ASCT before 2007, 19 pts (9.7%) received salvage ASCT. After 2007, 21 of 311 MM pts (6.7%) received salvage ASCT (P= 0.24). When comparing salvage ASCT in the two time periods, no significant differences were noted, with the exception of a slightly lower KPS status (80% vs 70%, P=0.001), and the use of novel agents before the salvage therapy (0/19 (0%) vs 17/21 (81%), p <0.001). Otherwise the clinical characteristics, prior response and response duration, and initial stage were similar. Prior to 2007, 6 of 44 (14%) pts older than 65 years received salvage ASCT, whereas after 2007 only 3 of 110 (3%) patients received salvage ASCT (p = 0.017). Conclusions: Outside of clinical trials, the use of salvage second ASCT for relapsed MM is not frequent, and was noted to be decreasing further after 2007. We speculate that this 30% relative reduction in the frequency of salvage ASCT after 2007 is likely explained by the introduction of novel agents such as bortezomib and lenalidomde into the clinical practice, the use of maintenance therapy post-ASCT, and more non-ASCT options for salvage treatment after relapse. Further studies are needed to investigate the optimal timing for salvage ASCT and the patients who will best benefit from such treatment. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wingard: Astellas: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Ansun: Consultancy; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. S444-S445
Author(s):  
Bella Maldonado-Guerrero ◽  
Mayhua Lam-Rodríguez ◽  
Julie Abifandi-Valverde ◽  
Migleth Cisneros-López ◽  
Ana Thur de Koos-Acosta ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 09 (04) ◽  
pp. 233-235
Author(s):  
Rahul Naithani ◽  
Nitin Dayal ◽  
Reeta Rai

Abstract Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) in very young patients is uncommon, and no treatment guidelines exist for these patients. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of five very young myeloma patients who underwent tandem autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Results The median age was 37 years (range = 34–40 years). A median of two leukapheresis was performed (range = 1–4). The median number of hematopoietic stem cells collected was 5.4 × 106/kg (4.4–8.2 × 106/kg). During first transplant, four patients received melphalan of 200 mg/m2 and one patient received melphalan of 140 mg/m2 (due to renal failure) as conditioning regimen. Second transplant conditioning was melphalan of 200 mg/m2 for one patient and melphalan of 140 mg/m2 for remaining four patients. Two patients were in complete remission, and two were in very good partial remission and one patient progressed to active disease at the time of tandem autologous bone marrow transplant. All patients developed significant mucositis. Neutrophil and platelet recovery was longer in tandem autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. More viral infections were seen in tandem transplant. Day 30 and day 100 mortality was nil. Conclusion We present data on tandem autologous HSCTs in very young patients with MM in India. Responses continued to improve in this small series.


Cancer ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 119 (23) ◽  
pp. 4188-4195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Desiree Jones ◽  
Elisabeth G. Vichaya ◽  
Xin Shelley Wang ◽  
Mary H. Sailors ◽  
Charles S. Cleeland ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5701-5701
Author(s):  
Justin King ◽  
Mark A. Fiala ◽  
Scott R. Goldsmith ◽  
Keith E. Stockerl-Goldstein ◽  
Mark A. Schroeder ◽  
...  

Historically, high-dose therapy in combination with autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) was reserved for younger patients. In more recent years, the use of ASCT has expanded in the older population. However, there is still limited data on the utilization and efficacy of ASCT in older patients, particularly those over the age of 75. To further evaluate this issue, we retrospectively analyzed all patients with newly diagnosed MM between the ages of 75-78, the institutional cutoff for ASCT eligibility, that were referred to the stem cell transplant unit at our institution for consultation from the years 2012-2018. Baseline characteristics, anti-myeloma treatments, and patient outcomes were abstracted through chart review. Seventy-five patients were referred to our institution. 71% were male, 29% female. 39% patients were considered ineligible for ASCT by the consulting transplant physician. Most patients were considered transplant ineligible due to comorbidities or poor performance status. Of the 46 patients eligible for ASCT, 52% underwent the procedure during their first-line therapy. The majority of those patients received reduced intensity melphalan (140 mg/m2) while 2 patients received conventional dosing (200 mg/m2). The other 22 patients eligible for ASCT declined or elected to defer the procedure and to be treated with conventional therapy. The characteristics of these three groups were similar and are detailed in Table 1. After a median follow-up of 30 months, 25% of the patients had expired. Estimated median overall survival (OS) was 71.3 months (unable to quantitate 95% CI) for all patients. Compared to transplant eligible patients, regardless of transplant receipt, those who were transplant ineligible had a 186% increase risk for death (HR 2.86; 95% CI 1.12-7.35; p = 0.029). There was also a notable trend for longer OS in those who underwent ASCT compared to those who were eligible but declined the procedure, but it was not statistically significant (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.10-1.28; p = 0.114). At a transplant center, two-thirds of patients referred for newly diagnosed MM between the ages 75-78 were considered eligible for ASCT and one-third underwent the procedure. Outcomes were better for patients eligible for ASCT, regardless of whether they underwent the procedure. There was also a trend for better OS in patients who underwent the procedure compared to those who declined. While small sample sizes and the retrospective nature of the study limit our ability to draw conclusions, it appears that ASCT has an OS benefit among patients age 75-78. Disclosures Fiala: Incyte: Research Funding. Stockerl-Goldstein:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Abbott: Equity Ownership. Vij:Genentech: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wildes:Janssen: Research Funding; Carevive: Consultancy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (s4) ◽  
pp. 45-47
Author(s):  
Cezara-Iuliana Tudor ◽  
Erzsébet Lázár ◽  
Marius-Vasile Găzdac ◽  
Annamária Pakucs ◽  
Eszter Mild ◽  
...  

AbstractStem cells are undifferentiated cells that can divide and become differentiated. Hematopoietic stem cells cannot transform into new stem cells such as cardiomyocytes or new heart valves, but they act through paracrine effects, by secreting cytokines and growth factors that lead to an increase in contractility and overall improved function. In this case report, we present how autologous stem cell transplantation can bring two major benefits: the first refers to hematological malignancy and the second is about the improvement of the heart condition. We present the case of a 60-year-old patient diagnosed with multiple myeloma suffering from a bi-valve severe condition in which autologous stem cell transplantation led to the remission of the patient’s malignant disease and also improved the heart function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document