scholarly journals Improvements in Fatigue Correlate with Changes in Clinical and Hematological Outcomes: Post Hoc Analyses from the Pegasus Study

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
David Cella ◽  
William R. Lenderking ◽  
Sujata P. Sarda ◽  
Scott B. Baver ◽  
Mohamed Hamdani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Physical Functioning ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria ◽  
Reticulocyte Count ◽  
Hemoglobin Level ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Indirect Bilirubin ◽  
Post Hoc

BACKGROUND Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, acquired, life-threatening hematologic disease characterized by complement-mediated hemolysis resulting in anemia, thrombosis, and bone marrow failure. The PEGASUS phase 3 randomized study demonstrated superiority of pegcetacoplan vs. eculizumab on improvements in hemoglobin, and pegcetacoplan improved clinical and hematological outcomes such as fatigue in patients with partial response to eculizumab after treatment for at least 3 months (Hb <10.5 g/dL). The objectives of these post-hoc analyses were to explore relationships among effect modifiers, including fatigue and hemoglobin, reticulocyte count, indirect bilirubin, and physical functioning. Also, this study assessed further detail on the treatment effects of pegcetacoplan on fatigue in patients. METHODS Patients ≥18 years of age with PNH and hemoglobin concentration <10.5 g/dL despite receiving treatment with eculizumab for ≥3 months were eligible for inclusion. Patients entered a 4-week run-in period in which they received eculizumab plus twice-weekly pegcetacoplan (1080 mg, self-administered subcutaneously) and were then randomized 1:1 to monotherapy with pegcetacoplan or eculizumab for 16 weeks. Fatigue was evaluated with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) -Fatigue scale, and a variety of symptoms (including fatigue and physical functioning) were evaluated with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ-C30) scale. Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman correlations and known groups validity was assessed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), as suggested by the FDA Guidance on patient-reported outcomes (US Food Drug Administration.Fed Regist. 2009;74(235):65132-65133). Subjects were grouped based on hemoglobin level (<10 g/dL, 10 to ≤12 g/dL, >12 g/dL), and by degree of hemoglobin improvement: <1 g/dL, ≥1 to <2 g/dL, and ≥2 g/dL. RESULTS At Week 16, in the overall sample (n = 80; intent-to-treat), the FACIT-Fatigue total score was significantly correlated with hemoglobin (r = 0.47, p < 0.0001; Figure 1), reticulocyte count (r = -0.37, p < 0.01), indirect bilirubin (r = -0.25, p < 0.05), and with multiple EORTC domains including fatigue and physical function (r = -0.88, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.82, p < 0.0001 respectively). In a responsiveness analysis, groups with greater improvement in hemoglobin over 16 weeks showed the most improvement in fatigue (F = 9.03, p < 0.0001), with the largest reduction in fatigue in the group with an increase in hemoglobin of ≥2 g/dL (11.3-point improvement in FACIT-F total score). In contrast, individuals with little to no hemoglobin improvement (<1 g/dL) reported slightly more fatigue (-1.2 worsening in FACIT-F total score). The FACIT-F also distinguished between groups with different levels of hemoglobin (<10 g/dL, 10 to ≤12 g/dL, >12 g/dL) at Week 16 (F = 4.78, p = 0.0019). An analysis of the correlation of change scores indicates a clear separation between pegcetacoplan and eculizumab, showing a greater effect of pegcetacoplan on change in hemoglobin and improvement in fatigue (Figure 2). CONCLUSION In PNH, hemoglobin level and positive change in hemoglobin were significantly related to reduced fatigue. Pegcetacoplan resulted in significantly lower fatigue and hemoglobin scores at Week 16 compared to eculizumab. Disclosures Cella: Novartis:Consultancy;Kiniksa:Consultancy;IDDI:Consultancy;BMS:Consultancy, Research Funding;Oncoquest:Consultancy;ASAHI KASEI PHARMA CORP.:Consultancy;Mei Pharma:Consultancy;Ipsen:Consultancy, Research Funding;Evidera:Consultancy;DSI:Consultancy, Research Funding;BlueNote:Consultancy;Abbvie:Consultancy, Research Funding;Astellas:Consultancy, Honoraria;FACIT.org:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: President;PROMIS Health Org:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other;Pled Pharma:Research Funding;Janssen:Research Funding;Clovis:Research Funding;Alexion:Research Funding;Apellis:Consultancy;Pfizer:Consultancy, Research Funding.Lenderking:Evidera:Current Employment.Sarda:Apellis:Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Baver:Apellis:Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Hamdani:Apellis Pharmaceuticals:Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Hsieh:Evidera/PPD:Current Employment.Shaffer:Evidera:Current Employment.Röth:Sanofi:Consultancy, Honoraria;Roche:Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis:Consultancy, Honoraria;Biocryst:Consultancy, Honoraria;Apellis:Consultancy, Honoraria;Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.:Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Pegcetacoplan is an investigational drug for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria

scholarly journals Categorized Hematologic Response to Pegcetacoplan Versus Eculizumab in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria: Post Hoc Analysis of Data from a Phase 3 Randomized Trial (PEGASUS)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 44-45
Author(s):  
Antonio Risitano ◽  
Ilene C. Weitz ◽  
Carlos M. de Castro ◽  
Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽  
Morag Griffin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Hematologic Response ◽  
Post Hoc

INTRODUCTION Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, acquired, clonal, nonmalignant hematologic disease characterized by complement-mediated red blood cell hemolysis. The current standard of care for patients with PNH is C5 inhibition. Anemia persists in up to ~70% of patients receiving eculizumab and is attributed to persistent intravascular hemolysis (IVH) and mostly to C3-mediated extravascular hemolysis (EVH). Pegcetacoplan is a pegylated pentadecapeptide C3 inhibitor targeting proximal complement to control both IVH and EVH. PEGASUS is a phase 3, open-label, active-comparator controlled study of efficacy and safety of pegcetacoplan versus eculizumab. This post hoc analysis of data from PEGASUS categorized the clinical response to pegcetacoplan or ECU in patients with PNH and hemoglobin <10.5 g/dL (despite stable ECU for ≥3 months). METHODS Hematologic response to treatment was categorized (per Risitano AM, et al. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1157) as complete, major, good, partial, minor, or no response, using number of packed red blood cell transfusions required, hemoglobin level, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, and absolute reticulocyte count (ARC). Complete response: no transfusions required, stable hemoglobin in the normal range, and no evidence of hemolysis (ie, LDH ≤1.5× upper limit of normal, ARC ≤150,000/µL). Major response: no transfusion, normal hemoglobin, but with evidence of hemolysis (LDH >1.5× upper limit of normal and/or ARC >150,000/µL). Good response: no transfusion, but with chronic mild anemia or evidence of hemolysis. Partial response: chronic moderate anemia and/or occasional transfusions (<3 units/6 months). Minor response: regular transfusions required (3-6 units/6 months). No response: regular and frequent transfusions required (>6 units/6 months). Nine patients (6 from the pegcetacoplan arm and 3 from the eculizumab arm) did not readily fit within the existing criteria due to the availability of data at week 16. Although these 9 patients were manually categorized identically by the lead and senior author in a blinded, independent manner, they were not included among these data. RESULTS The intention-to-treat population was comprised of 41 patients randomized to pegcetacoplan and 39 patients randomized to eculizumab. Four patients in the pegcetacoplan arm and 1 patient in the eculizumab arm were not evaluable for analysis due to incomplete data at week 16. Altogether, 61.0% of patients (25/41) in the pegcetacoplan arm have achieved at least a good hematological response, in contrast to 5.1% (2/39) of the eculizumab arm. At week 16, the distribution of response categories was as follows (Figure): in the pegcetacoplan arm and eculizumab arm, respectively, complete responses were 36.6% and 0%, good responses were 24.4% and 5.1%, partial responses were 12.2% and 33.3%, minor responses were 2.4% and 23.1%, and no responses were 0% and 28.2%. The addition of the 9 manually categorized patients did not significantly alter the proportions reported here. Among the factors that may contribute to heterogeneity of hematologic response to treatment are impaired bone marrow function, residual IVH, and residual C3-mediated EVH. Bone marrow failure was ruled out, and no difference in LDH was observed, suggesting that the major factor accounting for the difference between the 2 arms was the prevention of C3-mediated EVH (as confirmed by reduction of C3-opsonization of PNH red blood cells). CONCLUSION In PEGASUS, treatment with pegcetacoplan resulted in a greater proportion of patients with better hematological responses compared to eculizumab. These results further support the concept that proximal complement inhibition, by preventing EVH in addition to controlling IVH, leads to clinical and hematological improvement in the treatment of PNH. Disclosures Risitano: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Samsung: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amyndas: Consultancy; RA pharma: Research Funding; Biocryst: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Achillion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Weitz:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Consultancy, Honoraria. de Castro:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Steering committee; Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biocryst: Honoraria, Other: Data monitoring committee; Apellis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kiladjian:AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Griffin:Biocryst: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: Conference Support. Hamdani:Apellis: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ajayi:Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Baver:Apellis: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Peffault De Latour:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Pegcetacoplan is an investigational drug for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Voxelotor in Adolescents and Adults with Sickle Cell Disease: HOPE Trial 72-Week Analysis

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 19-19
Author(s):  
Jo Howard ◽  
Kenneth I. Ataga ◽  
R. Clark Brown ◽  
Maureen Achebe ◽  
Videlis Nduba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lactate Dehydrogenase ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Cell Disease ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Indirect Bilirubin ◽  
Safety Signals

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a lifelong, inherited disorder characterized by mutations in the hemoglobin (Hb) subunit β gene that leads to the production of sickle hemoglobin (HbS). When HbS is deoxygenated, polymerization leads to red blood cell sickling and damage, resulting in hemolysis, chronic anemia, and episodic vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs). Patients with SCD are at an increased risk of developing long-term complications, including stroke, leg ulcers, and other end-organ damage. Lower Hb levels highly correlate with increased morbidity and early mortality in SCD. Voxelotor (Oxbryta®) is an oral, once-daily HbS polymerization inhibitor indicated for the treatment of SCD in adults and adolescent patients ≥12 years of age. The 24-week analysis of the HOPE trial demonstrated that treatment with voxelotor 1500 mg resulted in a significantly greater proportion of patients achieving a >1 g/dL Hb increase compared with placebo (51.1% vs 6.5%, P<0.001), which was associated with concordant improvements in hematological markers of hemolysis (indirect bilirubin and reticulocyte percentage). Here we report the evaluation of efficacy and safety of voxelotor 1500 mg at 72 weeks, the conclusion of the placebo-controlled HOPE trial. Methods: In the randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 HOPE trial, adults and adolescents (aged 12-65 years) with SCD were randomized to receive voxelotor (1500 mg or 900 mg) or placebo. Included patients had an Hb level of 5.5 to 10.5 g/dL at enrollment and 1 to 10 vaso-occlusive crises in the 12 months prior to screening. Concurrent hydroxyurea was allowed if the dose had been stable for ≥90 days at enrollment. Changes from baseline in Hb and hemolysis markers (absolute and percentage reticulocyte, indirect bilirubin levels, and lactate dehydrogenase levels) and safety were assessed at week 72. Results: 89% (95% CI, 82.4% to 95.4%) of patients receiving voxelotor 1500 mg achieved a Hb increase of >1 g/dL at 1 or more time points during the 72-week treatment period compared with 25% (95% CI, 16.2% to 33.8%) of those receiving placebo (P<0.001). The mean change in Hb from baseline at week 72 was 1.0 g/dL in patients treated with voxelotor 1500 mg compared with 0.0 g/dL in patients receiving placebo (Figure 1; P<0.001). Mean change from baseline to average Hb throughout the 72-week duration was 1.26 g/dL in patients treated with voxelotor 1500 mg. Consistent with the week 24 analysis, significant improvements in markers of hemolysis (assessed by difference in adjusted mean percent change versus placebo) were seen in indirect bilirubin (-26.6% [95% CI, -40.2% to -12.9%]) and reticulocyte percentage (-18.6% [95% CI, -33.9% to -3.3%]) in the voxelotor 1500 mg group relative to placebo, with favorable trends of reduction in other markers, such as absolute reticulocyte count (-5.8% [95% CI, -23.4% to 11.9%] and lactate dehydrogenase (-4.8% [95% CI, -13.8% to 4.1%]). The overall incidence rate of VOCs was numerically lower in the 1500 mg arm compared with placebo, but was not statistically significant. Rates of non-SCD and SCD-related treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between the treatment groups, with no new safety signals noted through week 72. Conclusions: Voxelotor 1500 mg resulted in durable improvements in Hb levels and markers of hemolysis out to 72 weeks of treatment, with approximately 90% of patients achieving an increase in Hb >1 g/dL at 1 or more time points during the study. Treatment with voxelotor remained well tolerated, with no new safety signals detected with longer-term follow-up. These results support the sustained and chronic use of voxelotor to reduce anemia and hemolysis, thereby potentially mitigating the associated morbidity and mortality of SCD. Disclosures Howard: Imara, Inc., Novartis, Resonance Health: Honoraria; Agios, Forma Therapeutics, Inc., Global Blood Therapeutics, Imara, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ataga:Editas Medicine: Honoraria; Global Blood Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shire/Takeda: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Modus Therapeutics: Honoraria; Bioverativ: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Achebe:Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy. Hassab:Global Blood Therapeutics: Research Funding. Agodoa:Global Blood Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Tonda:Global Blood Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Gray:Global Blood Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lehrer-Graiwer:Global Blood Therapeutics: Other: Former employee and former equity holder. Vichinsky:Pfizer: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Effect of Luspatercept on Biomarkers of Erythropoiesis in Patients (Pts) with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) in the Medalist Trial

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 38-39
Author(s):  
Uwe Platzbecker ◽  
Yiming Zhu ◽  
Xianwei Ha ◽  
Alberto Risueño ◽  
Esther Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Reticulocyte Count ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Erythroid Maturation

Introduction: LR-MDS are characterized by ineffective erythropoiesis that leads to anemia and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependence. Luspatercept is a first-in-class erythroid maturation agent that binds to select TGF-β superfamily ligands and enhances late-stage erythropoiesis. MEDALIST is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of luspatercept in pts with LR-MDS (IPSS-R-defined Very low-, Low-, and Intermediate-risk) with ring sideroblasts who required RBC transfusions and were ineligible for, intolerant of, or refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Clinical benefit (CB; defined as RBC transfusion independence [RBC-TI] ≥ 8 weeks and/or modified hematologic improvement-erythroid [mHI-E] per IWG 2006 criteria) in the primary MEDALIST treatment phase (Weeks 1-24) was achieved by 58.2% of pts in the luspatercept arm and 21.1% in the placebo arm (P < 0.0001). The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of luspatercept treatment on erythropoiesis biomarkers and their relationship to CB in the primary MEDALIST treatment phase (Weeks 1-24). Methods: In the MEDALIST trial, 229 pts were randomized to receive either luspatercept (N = 153) or placebo (N = 76). Reticulocyte count was determined in blood samples collected at baseline and during the primary treatment phase. Serum biomarkers (soluble transferrin receptor 1 [sTfR1], erythroferrone [ERFE], and erythropoietin [EPO]) were measured by ELISA. Bone marrow (BM) erythroid precursors (EP) were determined by cytomorphology from BM aspirates. Biomarker levels were compared between baseline and Week 25 within treatment arms and between pts with CB and without CB in the luspatercept arm using a paired 2-tailed t-test and unpaired t-test (parametric method). Results: In the luspatercept arm, mean reticulocyte count increased from baseline, starting at 8 days after first dose (55.1 vs 34.5 × 109/L at baseline, P < 0.0001), and remained elevated throughout the evaluation period (Figure). Mean EPO levels increased significantly within 6 weeks after first dose (440.1 vs 220.4 IU/L at baseline, P < 0.0001) and remained elevated up to Week 25. Similarly, levels of sTfR1 (P < 0.0001), ERFE (P < 0.0001), and EP (P = 0.0010) were elevated at Week 25 relative to baseline (Table). The mean transfusion burden (within 16 weeks) was significantly reduced at Week 25 compared with baseline (7.2 vs 11.0 units, P < 0.0001). In contrast, in the placebo arm, reticulocyte count, EPO levels, and 16-week transfusion burden remained largely unchanged, while levels of sTfR1 (P < 0.0001), ERFE (P = 0.0431), and EP (P = 0.0010) were significantly lower at Week 25 relative to baseline. In the luspatercept arm, mean baseline EP were higher in 87 pts with CB (31.3%) compared with 63 pts without CB (26.5%; P = 0.0298). No statistically significant differences in baseline EPO, ERFE, sTfR1, reticulocyte count, and 16-week transfusion burden were observed in either group. At Week 25, pts with luspatercept and CB had a significantly greater increase of reticulocyte count (2.7 vs 1.8 mean fold increase from baseline, P = 0.0017), but not EPO levels (2.9 vs 4.3 mean fold increase from baseline, P = 0.1370) compared with pts without CB. Changes in erythropoiesis-related biomarkers (EP, ERFE, and sTfR1) did not differ significantly between pts with and without CB. To investigate whether luspatercept affects erythroid maturation, the ratio of reticulocyte/sTfR1 was calculated. This ratio was reasoned to be an approximation of the ratio of late-stage erythropoiesis (reticulocytes) within total erythropoiesis (sTfR1). Luspatercept increased the mean ratio of reticulocyte/sTfR1 in pts with CB (2.2 in Week 25 vs 1.5 at baseline, P < 0.0001) and no CB (1.9 in week 25 vs 1.3 at baseline, P = 0.0071). Conclusions: Luspatercept-treated pts in the MEDALIST trial had an increase of erythropoiesis-associated biomarkers. Luspatercept-mediated CB (RBC-TI ≥ 8 weeks and/or mHI-E) was associated with increased blood reticulocyte counts and was higher in pts with expanded BM erythropoiesis (as measured by EP) at baseline. Together with the observation that the ratio of reticulocytes/sTfR1 increased during luspatercept treatment, this suggests that the luspatercept mechanism of efficacy in pts with LR-MDS is associated with an increase of erythroid maturation and reticulocytes. Disclosures Platzbecker: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Geron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Zhu:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ha:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Risueño:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Patents & Royalties: Named in BMS (before Celgene) patent filings related to predictive patient response biomarkers in hematological malignancies. Chan:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Zhang:BMS: Current Employment. Dunshee:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months; Genentech Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Acar:Bristol Myers Squibb: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Shetty:BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ito:BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. MacBeth:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Santini:Menarini: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acceleron: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Garbowski:Imara: Consultancy; Vifor Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fenaux:BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schwickart:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

scholarly journals Pegcetacoplan Is Superior to Eculizumab in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria Regardless of Prior Transfusion Requirement

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 32-33
Author(s):  
Regis Peffault De Latour ◽  
Carlos M. de Castro ◽  
Jeffrey Szer ◽  
Kensuke Usuki ◽  
Peter Hillmen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Material Support ◽  
Group Sex ◽  
Support Research

INTRODUCTION Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, acquired hematologic disease characterized by chronic complement-mediated intravascular and extravascular hemolysis. In the phase 3 PEGASUS study (NCT03500549), pegcetacoplan, a C3 inhibitor targeting the proximal complement pathway, was superior to eculizumab (ECU) on the primary endpoint of hemoglobin (Hb) change from baseline at week 16, and improved clinical and hematologic parameters. Additional analyses assessed if any groups of patients might experience further benefit from pegcetacoplan. METHODS Patients ≥18 years old with a diagnosis of PNH and persistent anemia (Hb <10.5 g/dL) at baseline, despite treatment with stable doses of ECU for ≥3 months, entered a 4-week run-in period during which all patients continued their current dose of ECU with the addition of twice-weekly pegcetacoplan (1080 mg, self-administered subcutaneously). On study day 1, patients were stratified based on baseline platelet count and prior transfusion requirements, and randomized 1:1 to monotherapy with pegcetacoplan or ECU for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint of change from baseline (before first dose of pegcetacoplan) at week 16 in Hb and key secondary endpoints (change from baseline at week 16 in absolute reticulocyte count [ARC] and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) were analyzed using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures by subgroups based on baseline age group, sex, race, number of packed red blood cell transfusions (<4 vs ≥4) within the 12 months prior to day −28, and platelet count at screening (<100,000/mm3 vs ≥100,000/mm3). The key secondary endpoint of transfusion avoidance was analyzed by calculating the number and proportion of patients who were transfusion-free and also analyzed by subgroups. For patients transfused during the randomized control period or who withdrew from the study, the primary and secondary data endpoints up to the transfusion or time of withdrawal were included, but all subsequent values were censored. RESULTS Pegcetacoplan treatment was associated with significantly greater increases in Hb levels than ECU at week 16, regardless of baseline age group, sex, race, prior transfusions, or platelet count (Tables 1-2). At week 16, regardless of baseline platelet count strata, mean Hb significantly increased from baseline in the pegcetacoplan group and decreased in the ECU group. The proportion of transfusion-free patients was similar in the pegcetacoplan group, regardless of age (≤65 years, 87.1%; >65 years, 80%), sex (female, 81.5%; male, 92.9%), race (Asian, 100%; black, 100%; white, 75.0%), transfusion strata (<4 transfusions, 85.0%; ≥4 transfusions, 85.7%), or platelet strata (<100,000/mm3, 83.3%; ≥100,000/mm3, 86.2%). A smaller proportion of patients were transfusion-free with ECU, regardless of age (≤65 years, 18.8%; >65 years, 0%), sex (female, 18.2%; male, 11.8%), race (Asian, 28.6%; black, 0%; white, 16.0%), transfusion strata (<4 transfusions, 31.3%; ≥4 transfusions, 4.3%), or platelet strata (<100,000/mm3, 0%; ≥100,000/mm3, 20.0%). Similar trends for more favorable results with pegcetacoplan versus ECU were seen across the prespecified subgroups for ARC and LDH. CONCLUSIONS In this prespecified stratified analysis of the phase 3 PEGASUS study of patients with PNH and persistent anemia, mean Hb levels increased significantly more, the proportion of transfusion-free patients was significantly higher, ARC change from baseline at week 16 was significantly lower, and LDH decreases were larger with pegcetacoplan versus ECU, regardless of baseline age group, sex, race, prior transfusion numbers, and platelet count. Disclosures Peffault De Latour: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding; Apellis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. de Castro:Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding; Apellis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Steering committee; Biocryst: Honoraria, Other: Data monitoring committee. Szer:Apellis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Prevail Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Usuki:Alexion: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Hillmen:Alexion: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Other: Financial or material support, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Financial or material support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Financial or material support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Other: Financial or material support, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Financial or material support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Other: Financial or material support. Griffin:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: Conference Support; Biocryst: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hamdani:Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ajayi:Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Weitz:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Consultancy, Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Pegcetacoplan is an investigational drug for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.

scholarly journals Subgroup Analyses of Elderly Patients Aged ≥ 70 Years in MAGNIFY: A Phase IIIb Interim Analysis of Induction R2 Followed By Maintenance in Relapsed/Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 30-31
Author(s):  
Frederick Lansigan ◽  
David Jacob Andorsky ◽  
Morton Coleman ◽  
Abdulraheem Yacoub ◽  
Jason M. Melear ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
The Past ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Iiib ◽  
Post Hoc

Background: Lenalidomide combined with rituximab (R2) has shown complimentary clinical activity and is a tolerable regimen in both untreated and relapsed or refractory (R/R) patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patients with advanced age at diagnosis are considered to be high risk, supporting post-hoc subgroup analyses by age, with a focus on patients aged ≥ 70 years from the MAGNIFY study. Methods: MAGNIFY is a multicenter, phase IIIb trial in patients with R/R follicular lymphoma (FL) grades 1-3b, transformed FL (tFL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; NCT01996865) exploring optimal lenalidomide duration. Lenalidomide 20 mg on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle + rituximab 375 mg/m2/week cycle 1 and then every 8 weeks starting with cycle 3 (R2) are administered for 12 cycles followed by 1:1 randomization in patients with stable disease, partial response, or complete response/complete response unconfirmed (CR/CRu) to R2 vs rituximab maintenance for 18 months. Data presented here focus on induction R2 in efficacy-evaluable FL grade 1-3a and MZL patients (FL grade 3b, tFL, and MCL not included) receiving ≥ 1 treatment with baseline/postbaseline assessments. The primary end point is progression-free survival (PFS) by 1999 International Working Group criteria. Post-hoc analyses were performed by analyzing data from patients aged ≥ 70 years at time of study entry. Results: As of November 30, 2019, 393 patients have enrolled and 152 (39%) were aged ≥ 70 years. Baseline characteristics including histology, disease status, and prior treatments of patients ≥ 70 and the overall population are shown in the table. Median PFS in the ≥ 70 subgroup was 36.0 months (95% CI, 28.3-NR). Overall response rate and CR/CRu were 75% and 38%, with a median duration of response that was not reached (95% CI, 27.1-NR). Efficacy results for the overall population are shown in the table. In patients ≥ 70 the most common (≥ 20%) any-grade treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were fatigue (44%), neutropenia (41%), diarrhea (34%), constipation (34%), and nausea (27%). Neutropenia (35%) was the only grade 3/4 TEAE occurring in > 10% of patients (febrile neutropenia occurred in 3 patients [2%]). TEAEs led to lenalidomide dose reduction in 69 patients (46%) and discontinuation in 40 patients (26%). Seventy-eight patients ≥ 70 (51%) completed all 12 cycles of induction treatment, and 72 (47%) have entered the maintenance phase. Sixty-one patients ≥ 70 (40%), compared to 35% of patients in overall population, prematurely discontinued both lenalidomide and rituximab, due to TEAEs (n = 26; 17%), progressive disease (n = 15; 10%), patient withdrawal (n = 12; 8%), death (n = 5; 3%), and other reasons (n = 3; 2%). Neutropenia was the only TEAE leading to discontinuation of lenalidomide in more than 2 patients (n = 10; 7%). Conclusions: Similar to findings in the overall population, R2 treatment in advanced-age patients with R/R FL and MZL resulted in encouraging efficacy, and with close attention to dose reduction there is a tolerable safety profile. Table Disclosures Lansigan: BMS Steering Committee for MAGNIFY Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Andorsky:AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding. Coleman:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.: Research Funding; Boston BIoMedical, Inc.: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Innocare: Research Funding; ARCUS Biosciences: Research Funding; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP (Acerta Pharma BV Trials): Research Funding; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP: Research Funding; BMS (Celgene Corporation): Research Funding; Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding; EMD Serono Research and Development Institute Inc.: Research Funding; Genetech (F. Hoffman-LaRoche Ltd): Research Funding; Hutchinson MediPharma, LTD: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Ipsen Group: Research Funding; Karyopharma Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Klus Pharma, Inc.: Research Funding; MeiPharma, Inc.: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Yacoub:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Hylapharm: Current equity holder in private company; Cara therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Ardelyx: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Dynavax: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Melear:AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Fanning:Prisma Health: Current Employment; Abbvie: Consultancy; TG Therapeautics: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Aventis: Speakers Bureau. Kolibaba:Compass Oncology: Ended employment in the past 24 months; Atara Biotech: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company; AbbVie: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Verastem: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartix: Research Funding. Reynolds:IHA Hematology/Oncology Consultants: Current Employment. Nowakowski:Ryvu: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Nanostrings: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kymera: Consultancy; Denovo: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gharibo:Bayer: Ended employment in the past 24 months; Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ahn:BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Li:BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Rummel:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen GmbH: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma GmbH: Honoraria. Sharman:Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase 3 Study of Danicopan, an Oral Complement Factor D Inhibitor, As Add-on Therapy to a C5 Inhibitor in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria with Clinically Evident Extravascular Hemolysis

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 6-7
Author(s):  
Austin Kulasekararaj ◽  
Antonio Risitano ◽  
Jong Wook Lee ◽  
Mingjun Huang ◽  
Jun-Ichi Nishimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Treatment Period ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Reticulocyte Count ◽  
Complement Factor ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Background: PNH is a rare, life-threatening disease caused by uncontrolled terminal pathway activation leading to intravascular hemolysis (IVH). The C5 inhibitors eculizumab (ECU) and ravulizumab (RAV) prevent IVH by inhibiting terminal complement; however, some C5 inhibitor-treated patients may experience persistent anemia due to extravascular hemolysis (EVH) caused by C3 fragment deposition and opsonization driven by constitutive activation of the alternative pathway (AP). Inhibition of factor D (FD), the rate limiting enzyme of the AP, acts on the complement cascade upstream of C3. Danicopan (ALXN2040, ACH-4471) is a first-in-class oral small molecule FD inhibitor. In vitro studies with RBCs collected from PNH patients have shown that danicopan not only inhibited hemolysis but also prevented deposition of C3 fragments on PNH RBCs. In a 24-week Phase 2 study of ECU-treated PNH patients with transfusion-dependent anemia (hemoglobin [Hgb] <10 g/dL), danicopan add-on resulted in clinically significant improvements in Hgb, near transfusion-independence, improvements in FACIT-Fatigue scores, and was generally well-tolerated; 96% of treatment-emergent adverse events were mild-to-moderate in severity and did not result in discontinuation. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, pivotal Phase 3 trial (NCT04469465; EudraCT 2019-003829-18) is to evaluate the efficacy of oral danicopan add-on therapy in PNH patients with clinically evident EVH (CE-EVH) on an approved C5 inhibitor. Study Design and Methods: This study consists of a 12-week double-blind placebo-controlled treatment period 1 followed by a 12-week danicopan+C5 inhibitor treatment period 2 and a long-term extension up to 1-year. Patients (target enrollment, N=84) will be randomized to danicopan or matched placebo TID in a 2:1 ratio for the 12-week treatment period 1. Patients randomized to placebo for treatment period 1 will switch to danicopan at week 12 (Figure). Eligible adult patients must be receiving a stable regimen of ECU or RAV (no change in drug/dose/interval for ≥24 weeks), and have CE-EVH, defined by anemia (Hgb ≤9.5 g/dL), absolute reticulocyte count ≥120 x 109/L, and ≥1 transfusion within 6 months before study entry. The starting dose of danicopan is 150 mg TID. Patients with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or direct bilirubin values >1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) will start at 100 mg TID. Doses may be escalated in 50-mg increments, with ≥4 weeks between escalations, to a maximum of 200 mg TID based on safety and clinical effect at protocol-specified time points. Exclusion criteria include major organ transplant or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), aplastic anemia requiring HSCT, complement deficiency, or ALT >2 × ULN. The primary efficacy endpoint is change in Hgb at week 12. Secondary endpoints are proportion of patients not requiring a transfusion through week 12, change from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue scores, and change from baseline in absolute reticulocyte count at week 12. Other secondary endpoints (at weeks 12 and 24) include RBC units transfused, Hgb stabilization, laboratory markers (including bilirubin, LDH, and PNH clone size), and patient-reported outcomes (EQ-5D-3L, EORTC-QLQ-C30, WPAI, and health resource utilization). Primary and secondary efficacy analyses will be performed on the intent-to-treat population; safety analyses will include all patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug. Danicopan has the potential to be the first oral PNH therapy, and offers an opportunity to enhance the well-characterized efficacy of C5 inhibitors without compromising safety. This Phase 3, pivotal trial will be the largest clinical evaluation of danicopan to date. More importantly, the trial has the potential to generate robust data to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of add-on, oral danicopan to C5 inhibitor therapy in PNH patients with clinically evident hemolysis. Figure Disclosures Kulasekararaj: Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Risitano:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Samsung: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amyndas: Consultancy; RA pharma: Research Funding; Biocryst: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apellis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Achillion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Lee:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Huang:Alexion: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Nishimura:Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Other: All authors received editorial support for this abstract, furnished by Scott Battle, funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland. ; Chugai: Consultancy. Ramirez-Santiago:Alexion: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

scholarly journals Two Currently Recruiting Randomized Phase III Trials: COMMODORE 1 and 2 Evaluating Crovalimab Vs Eculizumab in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria with or without Current Anti-Complement Therapy

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4313-4313
Author(s):  
Austin G. Kulasekararaj ◽  
Antonio Risitano ◽  
Alexander Roeth ◽  
Guangsheng He ◽  
Jeffrey Pu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Efficacy ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Primary Efficacy Analysis

Abstract Background Crovalimab is a novel anti-complement C5 antibody currently being studied as a treatment for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), a life-threatening disease associated with hemolytic anemia and thrombosis. Treatment with approved C5 inhibitors eculizumab or ravulizumab is effective, but can be limited by breakthrough hemolysis due to unsustained C5 inhibition, inadequate efficacy in patients with C5 mutational variants, and the requirement of regular intravenous infusions. Crovalimab is unique in that its properties allow for subcutaneous injections once every 4 weeks (Q4W) that can be self-administered. Additionally, crovalimab binds to C5 mutational variants. Promising results were obtained in the Phase I/II COMPOSER trial (NCT03157635; Röth et al, Blood. 2020) conducted in patients with PNH, with or without prior anti-C5 treatment. The efficacy and safety of crovalimab vs eculizumab will be evaluated in two Phase III, randomized, open-label trials in patients with PNH, with or without current complement C5 inhibition. Study Design and Methods COMMODORE 1 (NCT04432584) will enroll patients who are currently receiving complement C5 inhibitor therapy. This trial is divided into two parts (Figure). Patients aged ≥ 18 years will be randomized 1:1 to receive either crovalimab (Arm A) or eculizumab (Arm B) and will contribute to the primary efficacy analysis. Patients aged < 18 years can be enrolled in an exploratory descriptive arm (Arm C). Arm A and C patients will receive crovalimab loading and subsequent subcutaneous Q4W maintenance dosing from Week 5. Arm B patients will receive eculizumab intravenous maintenance dosing from Day 1, Q2W for a total of 24 weeks. Patients in Arm A and Arm C can continue to receive crovalimab, and patients in Arm B can switch to crovalimab after 24 weeks of treatment, as determined by the treating physician. The primary efficacy objective is to determine the non-inferiority of crovalimab vs eculizumab based on percentage change in lactate dehydrogenase levels from baseline, averaged over weeks 21, 23, and 25. Secondary efficacy objectives are to determine the proportion of patients who experience breakthrough hemolysis, achieve transfusion avoidance or hemoglobin stabilization, as well as determine mean change in fatigue according to the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue questionnaire from baseline to Week 25. Safety and tolerability of crovalimab vs eculizumab will also be evaluated along with pharmacokinetic, immunogenicity, biomarker, and health status utility objectives. COMMODORE 2 (NCT04434092) will enroll patients not currently treated with C5 complement inhibitors. This trial is also divided into two parts (Figure). Patients aged ≥ 18 years will be randomized 2:1 to receive either crovalimab (Arm A) or eculizumab (Arm B) and will contribute to the primary efficacy analysis. Patients aged < 18 years will be enrolled in an exploratory descriptive arm (Arm C). Arm A and C patients will receive crovalimab loading and subsequent subcutaneous Q4W maintenance dosing from Week 5. Arm B patients will receive induction doses of eculizumab intravenously QW for 4 weeks followed by maintenance dosing Q2W up to 24 weeks. Patients in Arm A and Arm C can continue to receive crovalimab, and patients in Arm B can switch to crovalimab, after 24 weeks of treatment, as determined by the treating physician. The primary efficacy objective is to determine the non-inferiority of crovalimab vs eculizumab, based on the proportion of patients who 1) achieve transfusion avoidance from baseline to Week 25 and 2) with hemolysis control from Week 5-25 (co-primary efficacy endpoints). Safety and tolerability of crovalimab vs eculizumab will also be evaluated along with pharmacokinetic, immunogenicity, biomarker, and health status utility objectives. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kulasekararaj: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Consultancy; Akari: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Biocryst: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Achilleon: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ra Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support. Risitano: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lecture fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lecture fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Samsung: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amyndas: Consultancy; RA Pharma: Research Funding; Biocryst: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Achillion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lecture fees; Jazz: Other: Lecture fees, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Other: Lecture fees, Speakers Bureau; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lecture fees, Speakers Bureau. Roeth: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bioverativ, a Sanofi company: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kira: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. He: LongBio Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: Consultancy. Pu: University of Arizona: Current Employment; Pennsylvania State University: Patents & Royalties; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wright: Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment. Appius: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sostelly: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment. Sreckovic: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: Current Employment. Stanzel: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Munir: F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy; Alexion: Honoraria. Nishimura: Apellis: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Chugai: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Biocryst: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Ravulizumab in Older Patients Aged >65 Years with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria in the 301 and 302 Phase 3 Extension Studies

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 42-43
Author(s):  
Regis Peffault De Latour ◽  
Jeffrey Szer ◽  
Austin Kulasekararaj ◽  
Jin Seok Kim ◽  
Caroline I. Piatek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria ◽  
Complement Inhibitor ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Background: In the two largest phase 3 studies in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), ravulizumab given every 8 weeks was noninferior to eculizumab given every 2 weeks across all efficacy endpoints. Data on efficacy and safety of ravulizumab in patients aged >65 years with PNH are limited. Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety of ravulizumab in patients with PNH aged >65 years with those aged ≤65 years. Methods: The population included patients from two phase 3 studies that assessed ravulizumab vs eculizumab in complement-inhibitor-naïve (301; NCT02946463) and -experienced (302; NCT03056040) adults with PNH. In study 301, patients were aged ≥18 years with a confirmed PNH diagnosis by flow cytometry and had a lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level ≥1.5x upper limit of normal (ULN; 246U/L). In study 302, patients were aged ≥18 years with a confirmed PNH diagnosis by flow cytometry, were clinically stable on eculizumab having received ≥6 months of treatment and had a LDH level ≤1.5x ULN. Patients were randomized to either ravulizumab or eculizumab for 26 weeks after which all received ravulizumab up to 52 weeks. This prespecified analysis stratified patients by age: ≤65 or >65 years. Primary endpoints included percentage change in LDH from baseline to weeks 26 and 52, percentage of patients achieving LDH-normalization (LDH-N; LDH levels: ≤1x ULN) at weeks 26 and 52 and transfusion avoidance (TA) from baseline to weeks 26 and 52. Breakthrough hemolysis (BTH), hemoglobin (Hgb) stabilization and FACIT-fatigue score were secondary endpoints. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed as an indicator of safety. Results: A total of 58 patients aged >65 years and 383 patients aged ≤65 years were included. Disposition and medical history were similar among subgroups at baseline (Table 1). Results for primary and secondary endpoints for the two subgroups were comparable across studies and efficacy was maintained through 52 weeks. A higher proportion of treatment-experienced patients (>65 years) achieved all endpoints vs -naïve patients (Table 2). The percentage change in LDH levels from baseline to 26 and 52 weeks was similar between subgroups in study 301 (-66.5 to -80.0%) whereas in study 302, LDH levels remained stable in all subgroups up to 52 weeks (-3.7 to 22%). The percentage of patients achieving LDH-N in both studies at 26 and 52 weeks differed; 43.8-63.9% of patients aged ≤65 years achieved LDH-N compared with 21.4-77.8% of patients aged >65 years. A higher proportion of older treatment-experienced patients (57.1‒77.8%) achieved LDH-N compared with older treatment-naive patients (21.4‒50.0%) at 26 and 52 weeks. In patients aged ≤65 years in both studies, 63.7‒89.4% achieved TA. In the >65 years subgroup, 14.3‒50.0% of treatment-naive patients achieved TA whereas in study 302, 54.5‒72.7% of patients achieved TA. The number of BTH events was low, with no events reported in older patients to date. Hgb stabilization was consistent in the ≤65 year subgroup between the studies; a higher proportion of older patients in study 302 (45.5‒71.4%) achieved stabilized Hgb compared with older patients in study 301 (14.3‒35.3%). A clinically significant 3-point change was seen in FACIT-fatigue scores (indicating improvements in fatigue), with higher scores observed for ravulizumab in both subgroups (Figure 1). One patient discontinued the extension of study 301 due to lung cancer onset during the 26-week period and died following discontinuation. Headache was the most frequent TEAE. The incidence of TEAEs reported during ravulizumab treatment up to 52 weeks did not increase vs the 26-week period, with few events (Table 3) and no difference between subgroups. Conclusions: We present clinical outcomes in the largest cohort of patients with PNH (>65 years) on ravulizumab in a clinical trial setting to date. Ravulizumab was associated with similar efficacy and safety in both age subgroups and showed consistent and durable efficacy through 52 weeks of treatment. A higher proportion of patients in study 302 achieved all efficacy endpoints than in study 301, which can be due to patients' prior complement inhibitor experience. This observation was more evident in older patients. There were no BTH events in the older patients to date, and the number of infections in both subgroups was low. Ravulizumab was well tolerated in older patients with no additional safety concerns compared to younger patients. Disclosures Peffault De Latour: Apellis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Szer:Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Consultancy; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Prevail Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kulasekararaj:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kim:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Piatek:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kulagin:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hill:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Current Employment. Wang:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Current Employment. Yu:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Current Employment. Ogawa:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Current Employment. Schrezenmeier:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Lee:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Effect of Moderate and Severe Hemophilia a on Daily Life in Children and Their Caregivers: A CHESS Paediatrics Study Analysis

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 43-45
Author(s):  
Kate Khair ◽  
Francis Nissen ◽  
Mariabeth Silkey ◽  
Tom Burke ◽  
Aijing Shang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Daily Life ◽  
Social Activity ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Lost Work ◽  
Hours Of Work

Introduction: Hemophilia A (HA) is a congenital bleeding disorder, caused by a deficiency in clotting factor VIII (FVIII) and characterized by uncontrolled bleeding and progressive joint damage. This analysis assesses the impact of disease burden on the daily life of children with hemophilia A (CwHA) and their caregivers, addressing a deficit of current research on this topic. Methods: The Cost of Haemophilia in Europe: a Socioeconomic Survey in a Paediatric Population (CHESS Paediatrics) is a retrospective, burden-of-illness study in children with moderate and severe HA (defined by endogenous FVIII [IU/dL] relative to normal; moderate, 1-5%; severe, <1%) across France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. CwHA were recruited and stratified by both age group (0-5 years:6-11 years:12-17 years=1:1:1) and disease severity (severe:moderate=approximately 2:1, prioritizing children with severe HA [CwSHA]). Data for this analysis were captured from physicians, children, and their caregivers. Physicians completed online case report forms for treated children, and the child and/or their caregivers completed a paper-based questionnaire utilizing 5-point Likert scales. For CwHA aged 0-7, the questionnaire was completed by the caregiver, while for CwHA aged 8-17, children and caregivers completed different sections. Hours of care provided by the caregiver and work lost by the caregiver were reported as median values due to non-normal data distribution. Informed consent was obtained for all participants. Upon review, the study was approved by the University of Chester ethical committee. Results: Data from child/caregiver questionnaires were available for 196 CwHA (moderate, 25.5%; severe, 74.5%); the majority of these children, as expected, were receiving prophylaxis (72.4%), and did not have FVIII inhibitors (89.8%; Table 1). There was a direct impact of disease burden on CwHA, particularly with regard to physical and social activities (Figure 1). Overall, it was agreed or strongly agreed by the child or caregiver that 48.0% and 57.5% of children with moderate HA (CwMHA) and CwSHA respectively, have reduced physical activity due to HA, and 46.0% and 57.5%, respectively, have reduced social activity due to HA. A total of 36.0% and 61.0% of CwMHA and CwSHA, respectively, had adapted their treatment in anticipation of physical or social activity (Table 1). Furthermore, 34.0% of CwMHA and 55.4% of CwSHA were frustrated due to their disease, and many (CwMHA, 36.0%; CwSHA, 50.7%) felt that they had missed opportunities (Figure 1). For 66.0% of CwMHA and 76.0% of CwSHA, it was reported that their daily life was compromised due to their HA. Caregivers provided a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 19.0 (10.0-59.5) and 12.0 (5.0-20.0) hours a week of care for the hemophilia-related needs of their CwMHA (n=30) or CwSHA (n=105), respectively. Of those who responded, 17.4% (n=4/23) and 25.0% (n=20/80) of caregivers to CwMHA or CwSHA, respectively, stated they have lost work due to their caregiving duty. This was more than twice as common for caregivers in families with multiple CwHA (42.9%, n=9/21 responses) compared with those in families with one CwHA (18.5%, n=15/81 responses). Median (IQR) hours of work per week estimated to be lost were 20.0 (17.0-22.0) for caregivers of CwMHA (n=4) and 12.5 (4.50-20.0) for caregivers of CwSHA (n=20). Conclusions: In conclusion, both children and caregivers make sacrifices in their daily lives due to HA; many CwHA reported reduced physical and social activities, fewer opportunities and feelings of frustration due to their HA. Caregivers reported spending a significant number of hours caring for their child and some reported losing work due to their caring responsibilities. However, some outcomes may be limited by the small number of respondents and narrow response options, particularly those regarding the caregiver burden. Responses on the hours of work lost may be subject to selection bias, as caregivers who have lost work may be more likely to respond to this question. Additionally, as this question is targeted at caregivers in employment, it is unknown if some caregivers have left employment due to their caregiving responsibilities. According to this analysis, children/caregivers are frequently required to adapt the child's treatment before the child engages in activities. Overall, the burden of disease was similar in children with moderate and severe HA. Disclosures Khair: Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Biomarin: Consultancy; HCD Economics: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medikhair: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding; Haemnet: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nissen:GSK: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Actelion: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment. Silkey:Aerotek AG: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy. Burke:HCD Economics: Current Employment; University of Chester: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy. Shang:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: All authors received support for third party writing assistance, furnished by Scott Battle, PhD, provided by F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.. Aizenas:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Meier:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. O'Hara:HCD Economics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy. Noone:Research Investigator PROBE: Research Funding; Healthcare Decision Consultants: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; European Haemophilia Consortium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals To Treat or Not to Treat? Understanding Treatment Patterns in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelofibrosis at the Time of Enrollment in the MOST Study

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 49-51
Author(s):  
Rami S. Komrokji ◽  
Brady L. Stein ◽  
Robyn M. Scherber ◽  
Patricia Kalafut ◽  
Haobo Ren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Therapy Initiation

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by extramedullary hematopoiesis, bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, and diminished quality of life. Treatment decisions may involve a variety of factors including prognosis and symptomatology. Data regarding real-world disease and demographic factors that contribute to therapy initiation and choice in pts with lower risk MF are limited. This analysis of data from the ongoing Myelofibrosis and Essential Thrombocythemia Observational STudy (MOST; NCT02953704) assessed whether these factors differ for lower risk pts who were treated vs untreated at enrollment. Methods: MOST is a longitudinal, noninterventional, prospective, observational study in pts with MF or essential thrombocythemia enrolled at clinical practices within the US. Pts included in the analysis (≥18 y), had low risk MF by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS; Blood. 2010;115:1703), or intermediate-1 (INT-1) risk by age >65 y alone. Pt data were entered into an electronic case report form during usual-care visits over a planned 36-month observation period. Pt-reported symptom burden was assessed using the MPN-Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF); Total Symptom Score (TSS) was calculated (0 [absent] to 100 [worst imaginable]; J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:4098). Data were analyzed with basic descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Of 233 pts with MF enrolled at 124 sites between 11/29/2016 and 03/29/2019, 205 were included in this analysis; 28 were excluded for being INT-1 risk for reasons other than age. Of the 205 pts, 85 (41.5%) were low- and 120 (58.5%) were INT-1 risk; 56.5% (48/85) and 59.2% (71/120), respectively, were being treated at enrollment. Pt characteristics are listed in Table 1A. Fewer low- vs INT-1 risk pts were JAK2 V617F or MPL positive, and more were CALR positive. The proportion of pts with palpable splenomegaly was similar for treated low- and INT-1 risk pts. In low risk pts, the proportion of pts with palpable splenomegaly was higher in untreated vs treated pts; whereas, in INT-1 risk pts, the opposite was observed (ie, lower proportion in untreated vs treated pts). Blood counts were generally similar across cohorts, except median leukocytes were lower for low risk treated pts and platelet counts were elevated in low- vs INT-1 risk pts. The proportion of pts with comorbidities was similar across cohorts, except for fewer cardiovascular comorbidities in low- vs INT-1 risk pts. Mean TSS was lower in low- vs INT-1 risk pts, but the proportion of pts with TSS ≥20 was greater in treated vs untreated pts in both low- and INT-1 risk groups. Fatigue was the most severe pt-reported symptom in all cohorts. Differences in mean TSS and individual symptom scores between risk groups were not significant (P > 0.05), except itching was worse among INT-1 risk pts (P=0.03). Physician-reported signs and symptoms were generally more frequent for untreated vs treated pts, irrespective of risk (all P > 0.05). Most low risk (69.4%) and INT-1 risk pts (61.2%) who were currently untreated at enrollment had not received any prior MF-directed treatment (Table 1B); the most common prior treatment among currently untreated pts was hydroxyurea (HU) in both risk groups. Of currently treated pts, HU was the most common MF-directed monotherapy at enrollment in low-risk pts, and ruxolitinib was most common in INT-1 risk pts. No low risk pts and few INT-1 risk pts were currently receiving >1 MF-directed therapy at enrollment. Conclusion: These real-world data from pts with MF enrolled in MOST show that a substantial proportion of both low- and INT-1 risk pts who had received treatment before enrollment were not being treated at the time of enrollment. Although watch-and-wait is a therapeutic option, the finding that many of these lower risk pts had in fact received prior therapies suggests an unmet need for effective and tolerable second-line treatment options. Treated pts had greater pt-reported symptom burden vs untreated pts, which suggests that high symptom burden may contribute to the decision for treatment. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate symptom burden change with therapy initiation. In this regard, future analyses of data from MOST are planned to assess the longitudinal evolution of the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and management of pts with MF. Disclosures Komrokji: Geron: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Acceleron: Honoraria. Stein:Incyte: Research Funding; Kartos: Other: educational content presented; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmaessentia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scherber:Incyte Corporation: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Kalafut:Incyte: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ren:Incyte: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Verstovsek:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma Corp: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; ItalPharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Protagonist Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document