B-PRISM (Precision Intervention Smoldering Myeloma): A Phase II Trial of Combination of Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Abstract Background: Early therapeutic intervention with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (HR-SMM) has shown to be effective by delaying time to progression to overt myeloma (Lonial J Clin Oncol 2020 Apr 10;38(11):1126-1137). Triplet and quadruplet combination therapies utilizing a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory agent and a CD38 monoclonal antibody are used extensively in patients with multiple myeloma due to far greater efficacy compared to lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone. These combinations have been studied in HR-SMM, demonstrating encouraging activity, including ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone and elotuzumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone. There are also current ongoing studies with curative intent utilizing more potent therapy in HR-SMM, including carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone with autologous stem cell transplantation (Mateos EHA 2019, abstract S871) and daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (NCT03289299). Daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-RVD) combination is highly effective and well-tolerated in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma at achieving high response rates as well as minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity based on results from the phase II GRIFFIN trial (Voorhees Blood 2020 Aug 20;136(8):936-945). Thus, we propose to examine the activity and safety of D-RVD in patients with HR-SMM. Study Design and Methods: This is a phase II single center, single-arm, open label study evaluating the combination of D-RVD in HR-SMM. Primary objective of this study is to determine the proportion of HR-SMM patients who are MRD negative at 2 years after receiving D-RVD. Secondary objectives include MRD negativity rate at 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months, progression-free survival, response rates and safety. Exploratory objectives include assessment of mass spectrometry quantification of M protein, examination of molecular evolution of tumor cells and to determine role of immune cells in progression of SMM. Patients must meet criteria for HR-SMM based on bone marrow clonal plasma cells ≥10% and any one or more of the following: Serum M protein ≥3.0 gm/dL, immunoparesis with reduction of two uninvolved immunoglobulin isotypes, serum involved/uninvolved free light chain ratio ≥8 (but less than 100), progressive increase in M protein level (evolving type of SMM), bone marrow clonal plasma cells 50-60%, abnormal plasma cell immunophenotype (≥95% of bone marrow plasma cells are clonal) and reduction of one or more uninvolved immunoglobulin isotypes, high risk FISH defined as any one or several of the following: t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), del 17p or 1q gain, MRI with diffuse abnormalities or 1 focal lesion (≥5mm), PET-CT with one focal lesion (≥5mm) with increased uptake without underlying osteolytic bone destruction. Patients that meet high risk definition by the new Mayo/IMWG 2018 "20-2-20" criteria are also eligible if they have 2 out of the following 3 criteria: Bone marrow plasmacytosis ≥20% , ≥2g/dl M protein, ≥20 involved: uninvolved serum free light chain ratio. Treatment duration with D-RVD is for 2 years (24 cycles). Daratumumab is administered at a dose of 1800mg subcutaneously (SQ) weekly for cycles 1-2, biweekly for cycles 3-6 and monthly until completion of cycle 24. Bortezomib is given at a dose of 1.3mg/m2 SQ on days 1, 8, 15 for cycles 1-6 and then biweekly until completion of cycle 24. Lenalidomide is administered on days 1-21 at a dose of 25mg for cycles 1-6 and 15mg for cycles 7-24. Dexamethasone is administered weekly at 20mg cycles 1-6 and biweekly during cycles 7-24. All eligible patients will undergo stem cell collection after cycle 6 of therapy. A single-stage design will be employed with 30 eligible patients entered. If 12 or more of the 30 eligible patients are MRD negative at 2 years (observed rate of >=40%), we will conclude that this treatment warrants further study. The probability of concluding that the treatment is effective if the true rate is 25% is 0.051 and is 0.90 if the true rate is 50%. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Nadeem: Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mo: Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Consultancy; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eli Lilly: Consultancy. Sperling: Adaptive: Consultancy. Richardson: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Secura Bio: Consultancy; Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ghobrial: AbbVie, Adaptive, Aptitude Health, BMS, Cellectar, Curio Science, Genetch, Janssen, Janssen Central American and Caribbean, Karyopharm, Medscape, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Takeda, The Binding Site, GNS, GSK: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

A Phase II Study of Daratumumab in Patients with High-Risk MGUS and Low-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-149797 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1649-1649

Author(s):

Omar Nadeem ◽

Robert A. Redd ◽

Michael Z. Koontz ◽

Jeffrey V. Matous ◽

Andrew J. Yee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Low Risk ◽

M Protein ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Bone Marrow Plasma

Abstract Introduction : Daratumumab (Dara) is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody that is approved for use in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). We hypothesized that early therapeutic intervention with Dara in patients with high-risk MGUS (HR-MGUS) or low-risk SMM (LR-SMM) would lead to eradication of the tumor clone by achieving deep responses, resulting in prevention of progression to MM. We present results of our phase II, single arm study of Dara in HR-MGUS and LR-SMM. Methods : Patients enrolled on this study met eligibility for either HR-MGUS or LR-SMM. HR-MGUS is defined as <10% bone marrow plasma cells and <3g/dL M protein and at least 2 of the following 3 high-risk criteria: Abnormal serum free light chain ratio (SFLC) of <0.26 or >1.65, M protein ≥ 1.5g/dL or non-IgG M protein. LR-SMM is defined by one of the following 3 criteria: M protein ≥3g/dL, ≥10% bone marrow plasma cells, SFLC ratio <0.125 or >8. Dara (16mg/kg) was administered intravenously on a weekly schedule for cycles 1-2, every other week cycles 3-6, and monthly during cycles 7-20. The primary objective of this study was to determine the proportion of patients who achieve very good partial response (VGPR) or greater after 20 cycles of Dara. Secondary objectives included duration of response, safety, and rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity in VGPR or greater patients. Correlative studies included assessing changes in immune microenvironment, evaluating clonal heterogeneity using deep sequencing, and determining association of genomic aberrations correlating with either response to therapy or progression of disease. Results : At the time of data cutoff, a total of 42 patients were enrolled on this study from 2018 to 2020 with participation of 5 sites. The median age for all patients at enrolment was 60 years (range 38 to 76), with 22 males (52.4%) and 20 females (47.6%). Majority of patients enrolled were classified as LR-SMM (n = 37, 88.1%) and the remaining 5 patients had HR-MGUS (11.9%). 41 patients have started treatment and are included in toxicity assessment, and 40 patients have at least completed 16 cycles (range 6-20). Grade 3 toxicities were rare and only experienced in 5/41 patients including diarrhea (n =1/41; 2%), flu like symptoms (n = 1/41; 2%), headache (n=1/41; 2%), and hypertension (n=2/41; 5%). Most common toxicities of any grade included fatigue (n = 24/41, 51%), cough (n = 19/41, 46%), nasal congestion (n = 18/41, 44%), headache (n = 14/41, 34%), hypertension (n = 11/41, 27%), nausea (n = 13/41, 32%), and leukopenia (n = 13/41, 32%). No patients have discontinued therapy due to toxicity. Minimal response or better was observed in 82.9% of patients (34/41) and PR or better was observed in 51.2% of patients (21/41). This included overall CR (n = 4, 9.8%), VGPR (n = 1, 2.4%), PR (n = 16, 39.0%), MR (n = 13, 31.7%), and SD (n = 7, 17.1%). In the 40 patients who completed at least 16 cycles, response rates were as follows: MR or better 85% (34/40), PR or better 52.5% (21/40) and VGPR or better 12.5% (5/40). Median time to VGPR was 7 months. Median overall survival and progression-free survival have not been reached and no patients have progressed to overt multiple myeloma while on study. Conclusion : Dara is very well tolerated among patients with HR-MGUS and LR-SMM with minimal toxicities. Responses are seen in majority of patients. Early therapeutic intervention in this precursor patient population appears promising but longer follow up is required to define the role of single agent Dara in preventing progression to MM, therefore avoiding more toxic interventions in this low-risk patient population. Disclosures Nadeem: Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yee: GSK: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy. Zonder: Caelum Biosciences: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Intellia: Consultancy; Alnylam: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron: Consultancy. Rosenblatt: Attivare Therapeutics: Consultancy; Imaging Endpoints: Consultancy; Parexel: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Wolters Kluwer Health: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties. Mo: AbbVIE: Consultancy; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eli Lilly: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sperling: Adaptive: Consultancy. Richardson: Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy; Secura Bio: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ghobrial: AbbVie, Adaptive, Aptitude Health, BMS, Cellectar, Curio Science, Genetch, Janssen, Janssen Central American and Caribbean, Karyopharm, Medscape, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Takeda, The Binding Site, GNS, GSK: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

A Phase II Trial of the Combination of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-149787 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2749-2749

Author(s):

Omar Nadeem ◽

Robert A. Redd ◽

Julia Prescott ◽

Kelsey Tague ◽

Veronica Romines ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Induction Phase ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Study Therapy

Abstract Background: Early therapeutic intervention in high-risk SMM (HR-SMM) has demonstrated benefit based on previous studies that included treatment with lenalidomide or lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Mateos et al. N Engl J Med 2013; Lonial et al. J Clin Oncol 2020). Combination therapy with triplets has shown higher rates of deep response and improved outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma, including the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Moreau et al. N Eng J Med 2016). We present our results of phase II study of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in HR-SMM. Methods: Patients enrolled on the study met eligibility for high-risk SMM based on the defined criteria proposed by Rajkumar et al. (Blood 2014). The treatment plan was designed to be administered on an outpatient basis where patients receive 9 cycles of induction therapy of ixazomib (4mg) at days 1, 8, and 15, in combination with lenalidomide (25mg) at days 1-21 and dexamethasone at days 1, 8, 15, and 22. The induction phase was followed by ixazomib (4mg) and lenalidomide (15mg) maintenance for another 15 cycles. A treatment cycle was defined as 28 consecutive days for a total of 24 months period. Bone marrow samples of all patients were obtained before starting therapy for baseline assessment for minimal residual disease (MRD) testing, whole-exome sequencing (WES), and RNA sequencing of plasma and bone marrow microenvironment cells. Moreover, blood samples were obtained at screening and before each cycle for isolating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Results: Sixty-one patients have been enrolled in this study from February 2017 to 2020. The median age of the patients at enrollment was 64 years (range, 40 to 84), with 33 males (54.1%). The analysis was conducted on patients who have completed at least 2 cycles of therapy (n=55). Thus far, 42 (69%) patients have completed the planned 24 cycles of therapy. High-risk cytogenetics (defined as the presence of t(4;14), 17p deletion, and 1q gain) were found in 14 patients out of the 33 evaluable (42.4%) Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) results. The median number of cycles completed was 24 cycles (range: 2-24). According to the new IMWG risk stratification model (20-2-20), baseline markers showed that 32 patients (58%) were high risk, 18 (33%) were intermediate risk, and 5 (9%) were low risk. The most common grades 3 or greater toxicities were neutropenia (20%), hypophosphatemia (13%), leukopenia (11%), rash (9%), lymphocytopenia (5%), and thrombocytopenia (5%). Stem cells were collected from all eligible patients by the end of the induction phase. No patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity. At the time of data cut off, the overall response rate (partial response or better) in participants who completed at least 2 cycles of treatment was 90.9% (50 of 55), with 12 complete responses (CR, 21.8%), 10 very good partial responses (VGPR, 18.2%), 28 partial responses (50.9%), and 4 minimal responses (MR, 7.3%). ORR in patients who completed the induction phase (≥9 cycles) was 92.3% (n= 48 of 52), with 22 (40%) deep remissions including 12 (23.1%) and 10 (19.2%) having achieved a CR and VGPR, respectively. All patients who had a CR have also achieved a stringent CR. No patients developed progression to overt or active MM while on study therapy. After completion of study therapy, 4 patients progressed to active MM during follow up, 3 additional patients developed biochemical progression and started a new course of therapy but did not meet CRAB criteria and 7 patients confirmed biochemical PD and remain off therapy. Conclusions: The combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is an effective all oral well-tolerated intervention in high-risk smoldering myeloma that demonstrated an ORR of >90% and deep remission in >40% of patients. While no patients progressed to overt MM while on therapy, some developed progression after completion of planned study therapy, indicating the possible need for higher intensification of therapy or maintenance therapy beyond 2 years in this high-risk group of patients. Longer follow-up for disease outcome is ongoing. Disclosures Nadeem: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mo: Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Consultancy; Eli Lilly: Consultancy; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVIE: Consultancy. Sperling: Adaptive: Consultancy. Richardson: AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Secura Bio: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ghobrial: AbbVie, Adaptive, Aptitude Health, BMS, Cellectar, Curio Science, Genetch, Janssen, Janssen Central American and Caribbean, Karyopharm, Medscape, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Takeda, The Binding Site, GNS, GSK: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Phase II Trial of the Combination of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117871 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 804-804 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Mark Bustoros ◽

Chia-jen Liu ◽

Kaitlen Reyes ◽

Kalvis Hornburg ◽

Kathleen Guimond ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

High Risk ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Rna Sequencing ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background. This study aimed to determine the progression-free survival and response rate using early therapeutic intervention in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) using the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone. Methods. Patients enrolled on study met eligibility for high-risk SMM based on the newly defined criteria proposed by Rajkumar et al., Blood 2014. The treatment plan was designed to be administered on an outpatient basis where patients receive 9 cycles of induction therapy of ixazomib (4mg) at days 1, 8, and 15, in combination with lenalidomide (25mg) at days 1-21 and Dexamethasone at days 1, 8, 15, and 22. This induction phase is followed by ixazomib (4mg) and lenalidomide (15mg) maintenance for another 15 cycles. A treatment cycle is defined as 28 consecutive days, and therapy is administered for a total of 24 cycles total. Bone marrow samples from all patients were obtained before starting therapy for baseline assessment, whole exome sequencing (WES), and RNA sequencing of plasma and bone marrow microenvironment cells. Moreover, blood samples were obtained at screening and before each cycle to isolate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Stem cell collection is planned for all eligible patients. Results. In total, 26 of the planned 56 patients were enrolled in this study from February 2017 to April 2018. The median age of the patients enrolled was 63 years (range, 41 to 73) with 12 males (46.2%). Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) was successful in 18 patients. High-risk cytogenetics (defined as the presence of t(4;14), 17p deletion, and 1q gain) were found in 11 patients (61.1%). The median number of cycles completed was 8 cycles (3-15). The most common toxicities were fatigue (69.6%), followed by rash (56.5%), and neutropenia (56.5%). The most common grade 3 adverse events were hypophosphatemia (13%), leukopenia (13%), and neutropenia (8.7%). One patient had grade 4 neutropenia during treatment. Additionally, grade 4 hyperglycemia occurred in another patient. As of this abstract date, the overall response rate (partial response or better) in participants who had at least 3 cycles of treatment was 89% (23/26), with 5 Complete Responses (CR, 19.2%), 9 very good partial responses (VGPR, 34.6%), 9 partial responses (34.6%), and 3 Minimal Responses (MR, 11.5%). None of the patients have shown progression to overt MM to date. Correlative studies including WES of plasma cells and single-cell RNA sequencing of the bone microenvironment cells are ongoing to identify the genomic and transcriptomic predictors for the differential response to therapy as well as for disease evolution. Furthermore, we are analyzing the cfDNA and CTCs of the patients at different time points to investigate their use in monitoring minimal residual disease and disease progression. Conclusion. The combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is an effective and well-tolerated intervention in high-risk smoldering myeloma. The high response rate, convenient schedule with minimal toxicity observed to date are promising in this patient population at high risk of progression to symptomatic disease. Further studies and longer follow up for disease progression are warranted. Disclosures Bustoros: Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Munshi:OncoPep: Other: Board of director. Anderson:C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Takeda Millennium: Consultancy; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopep: Equity Ownership. Richardson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ghobrial:Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Targeting EZH2 in Multiple Myeloma Could be Promising for a Subgroup of MM Patients in Combination with IMiDs

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.311.311 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 311-311 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Laurie Herviou ◽

Alboukadel Kassambara ◽

Stephanie Boireau ◽

Nicolas Robert ◽

Guilhem Requirand ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Myeloma Cells ◽

Ezh2 Expression ◽

Bone Marrow Plasma

Abstract Multiple Myeloma is a B cell neoplasia characterized by the accumulation of clonal plasma cells within the bone marrow.Epigenetics is characterized by a wide range of changes that are reversible and orchestrate gene expression. Recent studies have shown that epigenetic modifications play a role in multiple myeloma (MM) by silencing various cancer-related genes. We investigated the epigenetic genes differentially expressed between normal bone marrow plasma cells (BMPC ; N=5) and MM plasma cells from patients (N=206). Using SAM (Significance Analysis of Microarrays) analysis, only 12 genes significantly differentially expressed between BMPC and MM cells (ratio > 2 and FDR (false discovery rate) < 5%) were identified, including the EZH2 histone methyltransferase. EZH2, the enzymatic subunit of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2, is a histone methyltransferases able to repress gene expression by catalyzing H3K27me3 histone mark. EZH2 overexpression has been associated with numerous hematological malignancies, including MM. We thus studied EZH2 role in MM physiopathology and drug resistance. EZH2 expression was analyzed in normal bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs; N=5), primary myeloma cells from newly diagnosed patients (MMCs; N=206) and human myeloma cell lines (HMCLs; N=40) using Affymetrix microarrays. EZH2 gene is significantly overexpressed in MMCs of patients (median 574, range 105 - 4562) compared to normal BMPCs (median = 432; range: 314 - 563) (P < 0.01). The expression is even higher in HMCLs (median 4481, range 581 - 8455) compared to primary MMCs or BMPCs (P < 0.001). High EZH2 expression is associated with a poor prognosis in 3 independent cohorts of newly diagnosed patients (Heidelberg-Montpellier cohort - N=206, UAMS-TT2 cohort - N=345 and UAMS-TT3 cohort - N =158). Furthermore, GSEA analysis of patients with high EZH2 expression highlighted a significant enrichment of genes involved in cell cycle, downregulated in mature plasma cells vs plasmablasts, and EZH2 targets. Specific EZH2 inhibition by EPZ-6438 EZH2 inhibitor induced a significant decrease of global H3K27me3 in all the HMCLs tested (P < 0.01) and inhibited MM cell growth in 5 out of the 6 HMCLs tested. The inhibitory effect of EZH2 inhibitor on MM cell growth appeared at day 6 suggesting that it is mediated by epigenetic reprogramming. To confirm that EZH2 is also required for the survival of primary MMCs from patients, primary MM cells (n = 17 patients) co-cultured with their bone marrow microenvironment and recombinant IL-6 were treated with EPZ-6438. As identified in HMCLs, EZH2 inhibition significantly reduced the median number of viable myeloma cells by 35% (P = 0.004) from a subset of patients (n=9) while the other group (n=8) was resistant. Of interest, EPZ-6438 induced a significant global H3K27me3 decrease in both groups of patient. RNA sequencing of 6 HMCLs treated with EPZ-6438 combined with H3K27me3 ChIP analyses allowed us to create an EZ GEP-based score able to predict HMCLs and primary MM cells sensitivity to EZH2 inhibitors. We also observed a synergy between EPZ-6438 and Lenalidomide, a conventional drug used for MM treatment. More interestingly, pretreatment of myeloma cells with EPZ-6438 significantly re-sensitize drug-resistant MM cells to Lenalidomide. Investigating the effect of EPZ-6438/Lenalidomide combination in MMC, we identified that IKZF1, IRF4 and MYC protein levels were significantly more inhibited by the combination treatment (65.5%, 63.9% and 14.8% respectively) compared with Lenalidomide (51.5%, 43% and 2.2%) or EPZ-6438 (45.2%, 38.7% and 6.2%) alone. Clinical trials are ongoing with EZH2 inhibitors in lymphoma and could be promising for a subgroup of MM patients in combination with IMiDs. Furthermore, the EZ score enables identification of MM patients with an adverse prognosis and who could benefit from treatment with EZH2 inhibitors. Disclosures Goldschmidt: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Chugai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hose:EngMab: Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Travel grant; Sanofi: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Descriptive Analysis of Isatuximab Use Following Prior Daratumumab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-140526 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 20-21

Author(s):

Melody R Becnel ◽

Sandra B. Horowitz ◽

Sheeba K. Thomas ◽

Swami P. Iyer ◽

Krina K. Patel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

High Risk ◽

North America ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Laboratory Research ◽

Private Company ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Advisory Boards

Background: Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) like daratumumab (dara) have become integral in managing relapsed/refractory (RR) and newly diagnosed (ND) multiple myeloma (MM). Isatuximab (isa), a newer CD38 mAb, induces direct rather than indirect apoptosis of MM cells. However, little is known about whether the use of one prior CD38 mAb will alter the efficacy of another in subsequent lines of therapy. Methods: All patients (pts) with MM treated at MD Anderson with isa after receiving dara in prior lines of therapy were identified. We conducted a retrospective analysis with data points including patient and disease characteristics, responses to dara, response to isa, the presence of high risk features, and the presence of t(11,14). Results: 9 pts were identified, ages 56-72. 5 pts (55%) were male. 5 pts (55%) were alive at the time of data cutoff. 5 pts were Hispanic, 3 White, and 1 Black. 8 pts (89%) had high risk features as represented by the presence of del17p, t(4,14), t(14,16), t(14,20), p53 mutations, gain 1q, extramedullary disease (EMD), CNS disease, early relapse (within 1 year) after autologous transplant, or an increased (>5%) peripheral blood plasma cells (PBPC). 2 (22%) had t(11,14). 4 (44%) had IgG MM. 2 (22%) with light chain disease, 2 (22%) with IgA MM, and 1 (11%) with IgD MM. Dara was initially used in lines 2-7. Dara combinations with pomalidomide (pom), bortezomib (bor), thalidomide (thal), lenalidomide (len), or carfilzomib (car); and pom combinations that also included elotuzumab (elo) or Cytoxan (cytox) are noted in table 1. Dara was discontinued (dc'd) in 8 pts due to progressive disease (PD) and in 1 pt due to toxicity. 8 pts (89%) experienced a best overall response (ORR) of partial response (PR) to dara; 1 pt had stable disease (SD). All pts received prior len and 8 pts received prior pom at some time during the treatment of MM. All pts received isa in combination with pom/dexamethasone (dex). Best ORR to isa/pom/dex: 5 pt (55%) had PR, 2 pt with minimal response (MR), 1 SD, 1 PD. Median treatment duration of isa/pom/dex was 5 weeks (2-14 weeks) at data cutoff. 3 pts dc'd isa/pom/dex due to infections, and 2 due to later progression. 2 pts remain on therapy. 1 pt chose to dc all MM therapy for quality of life purposes despite PR with isa/pom/dex. 1 pt died from cardiac disease unrelated to MM or treatment. Conclusions: Our current study of heavily pretreated pts with RRMM demonstrates that despite prior anti-CD38 therapy with dara, most patients (77%) experienced a response of MR or better with treatment with another anti-CD38 therapy isa. To our knowledge, this is the first report of outcomes to isa in patients with prior dara therapy. Further long term follow up will be needed to determine the length of response. Additional studies are planned to further evaluate this patient population. Table 1 Disclosures Thomas: Pharmacyclics: Other: Advisory Boards; BMS: Research Funding; Ascentage: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; X4 Pharma: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Iyer:Rhizen: Research Funding; CRISPR: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Curio Biosciences: Honoraria; Target Oncology: Honoraria; Afffimed: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Legend Biotech: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Patel:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Nektar: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Manasanch:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Quest Diagnostics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; JW Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Kaufman:Janssen: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria. Lee:Genentech: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy. Orlowski:Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen, Inc., AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, EcoR1 Capital LLC, Forma Therapeutics, Genzyme, GSK Biologicals, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Biotech, Juno Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Legend Biotech USA, Molecular Partners, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; STATinMED Research: Consultancy; Founder of Asylia Therapeutics, Inc., with associated patents and an equity interest, though this technology does not bear on the current submission.: Current equity holder in private company, Patents & Royalties; Laboratory research funding from BioTheryX, and clinical research funding from CARsgen Therapeutics, Celgene, Exelixis, Janssen Biotech, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Role of Selectins in the Pathogenesis of Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.951.951 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 951-951 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Abdel Kareem Azab ◽

Phong Quang ◽

Feda Azab ◽

Costas M Pitsillides ◽

John T Patton ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

Flow Cytometry ◽

Endothelial Cells ◽

Cell Adhesion ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 951 INTRODUCTION: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is characterized by widespread disease at diagnosis with the presence of multiple lytic lesions and disseminated involvement of the bone marrow (BM), implying that the progression of MM involves a continuous re-circulation of the MM cells in the peripheral blood and re-entrance into the BM. Selectins are adhesion molecules expressed by activated endothelium of venules and leukocytes, and are involved in the primary interaction of lymphocytes with the endothelium of blood vessels. The binding of selectins serves as a biologic brake, making leukocyte quickly decelerate by rolling on endothelial cells, as the first step of extravasation. In this study, we have investigated the role of selectins and their ligands in the regulation of homing of MM Cells to the BM and the therapeutic implications of this role. METHODS AND RESULTS: We have used flow cytometry to characterize the expression of E, L and P-selectins and their ligands on MM cell lines, patient samples and on plasma cells from normal subjects. We found that all MM cell lines and patient samples showed high expression of L and P, but little of no E-selectin. While normal plasma cells showed low expression of all selectins and ligands.(give numbers) A pan-selectin inhibitor GMI-1070 (GlycoMimetics Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) inhibited the interaction of recombinant selectins with the selectin-ligands on the MM cells in a dose response manner. We have tested the role of the selectins and their ligands on the adhesion of MM cells to endothelial cells and found that MM cells adhered preferentially to endothelial cells expressing P-selectin compared to control endothelial cells and endothelial cells expressing E-selectin (p<0.05). Moreover, we found that blockade of P-selectin on endothelial cells reduced their interaction with MM cells (p<0.01), while blockade of E and L-selectin did not show any effect. Treating endothelial cells with GMI-1070 mimicked the effect of blocking P-selectin. Moreover, we found that treating endothelial cells with the chemokine stroma cell-derived factor-1-alpha (SDF1) increased their expression of P but not E or L-selectin detected by flow cytometry. Neither the blockade of each of the selectins and their ligands nor the GMI-1070 inhibited the trans-well chemotaxis of MM cells towards SDF1-alpha. However, blockade of P-selectin (p<0.001) on endothelial cells by GMI-1070 inhibited the trans-endothelial chemotaxis of MM cells towards SDF1-alpha. Both adhesion to endothelial cells and activation with recombinant P-selectin induced phosphorylation of cell adhesion related molecules including FAK, SRC, Cadherins, Cofilin, AKT and GSK3. GMI-1070 decreased the activation of cell adhesion molecules induced by both recombinant P-selectin and endothelial cells. Using in vivo flow cytometry we found that both anti P-selectin antibody and GMI-1070 prevented the extravasation of MM cells out of blood vessels into the bone marrow in mice. Moreover, we found that, in a co-culture system, endothelial cells protected MM cells from bortezomib induced apoptosis, an effect which was reversed by using GMI-1070, showing synergistic effect with bortezomib. CONCLUSION: In summary, we showed that P-selectin ligand is highly expressed in MM cells compared to normal plasma cells, and that it plays a major role in homing of MM cells to the BM, an effect which was inhibited by the pan-selectin inhibitor GMI-1070. This provides a basis for testing the effect of selectin inhibition on tumor initiation and tumor response to therapeutic agents such as bortezomib. Moreover, it provides a basis for future clinical trials for prevention of MM metastasis and increasing efficacy of existing therapies by using selectin inhibitors for the treatment of myeloma. Disclosures: Patton: GlycoMimetics, Inc: Employment. Smith:GlycoMimetics, Inc: Employment. Sarkar:GlycoMimetics, Inc: Employment. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Magnani:GlycoMimetics, Inc.: Employment. Ghobrial:Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Prevalence of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: Results from the Iceland Screens, Treats, or Prevents Multiple Myeloma (iStopMM) Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148617 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 151-151

Author(s):

Sigrun Thorsteinsdottir ◽

Gauti Kjartan Gislason ◽

Thor Aspelund ◽

Sæmundur Rögnvaldsson ◽

Jon Thorir Thorir Oskarsson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

High Risk ◽

Risk Stratification ◽

Light Chain ◽

Research Funding ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Population Based ◽

M Protein ◽

Screening Study

Abstract Background Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic precursor condition to multiple myeloma (MM). Emerging data from clinical trials indicate that - compared to watchful monitoring - initiation of therapy at the SMM stage might be indicated. Currently, there is no established screening for SMM in the general population and therefore patients are identified incidentally. Here, we define for the first time, epidemiological and clinical characteristics of SMM in the general population based on a large (N>75,000) population-based screening study. Methods The iStopMM study (Iceland Screens Treats or Prevents Multiple Myeloma) is a nationwide screening study for MM precursors where all residents in Iceland over 40 years of age and older were invited to participate. Participants with a positive M-protein on serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) or an abnormal free light chain (FLC) analysis entered a randomized controlled trial with three arms. Participants in arm 1 continued care in the Icelandic healthcare system as though they had never been screened. Arms 2 and 3 were evaluated at the study clinic with arm 2 receiving care according to current guidelines. In arm 3 bone marrow testing and whole-body low-dose CT (WBLDCT) was offered to all participants. SMM was defined as 10-60% bone marrow plasma cells on smear or trephine biopsy and/or M-protein in serum ≥3 g/dL, in the absence of myeloma defining events. Participants in arm 3 were used to estimate the prevalence of SMM as bone marrow biopsy was performed in all participants of that arm when possible. The age- and sex-specific prevalence was determined with a fitted function of age and sex, and interaction between those. Diagnosis at baseline evaluation of the individuals in the study was used to define the point prevalence of SMM. Results Of the 148,704 individuals over 40 years of age in Iceland, 75,422 (51%) were screened for M-protein and abnormal free light chain ratio. The 3,725 with abnormal screening were randomized to one of the three arms, and bone marrow sampling was performed in 1,503 individuals. A total of 180 patients were diagnosed with SMM, of which 109 (61%) were male and the median age was 70 years (range 44-92). Of those, a total of 157 (87%) patients had a detectable M-protein at the time of SMM diagnosis with a mean M-protein of 0.66 g/dL (range 0.01-3.5). The most common isotype was IgG in 101 (56%) of the patients, 44 (24%) had IgA, 2 (1%) had IgM, and 5 (3%) had biclonal M-proteins. A total of 24 (13%) patients had light-chain SMM. Four patients (2%) had a negative SPEP and normal FLC analysis at the time of SMM diagnosis despite abnormal results at screening. A total of 131 (73%) patients had 11-20% bone marrow plasma cells at SMM diagnosis, 32 (18%) had 21-30%, 9 (5%) had 31-40%, and 8 (4%) had 41-50%. Bone disease was excluded with imaging in 167 (93%) patients (MRI in 25 patients, WBLDCT in 113 patients, skeletal survey in 27 patients, FDG-PET/CT in 1 patient), 13 patients did not have bone imaging performed because of patient refusal, comorbidities, or death. According to the proposed 2/20/20 risk stratification model for SMM, 116 (64%) patients were low-risk, 47 (26%) intermediate-risk, and 17 (10%) high-risk. A total of 44 (24%) had immunoparesis at diagnosis. Using the PETHEMA SMM risk criteria on the 73 patients who underwent testing with flow cytometry of the bone marrow aspirates; 39 (53%) patients were low-risk, 21 (29%) patients were intermediate-risk, and 13 (18%) patients were high-risk. Out of the 1,279 patients randomized to arm 3, bone marrow sampling was performed in 970, and 105 were diagnosed with SMM (10.8%). The prevalence of SMM in the total population was estimated to be 0.53% (95% CI: 0.49-0.57%) in individuals 40 years of age or older. In men and women, the prevalence of SMM was 0.70% (95% CI: 0.64-0.75%) and 0.37% (95% CI: 0.32-0.41%), respectively, and it increased with age in both sexes (Figure). Summary and Conclusions Based on a large (N>75,000) population-based screening study we show, for the first time, that the prevalence of SMM is 0.5% in persons 40 years or older. According to current risk stratification models, approximately one third of patients have an intermediate or high risk of progression to MM. The high prevalence of SMM has implications for future treatment policies in MM as treatment initiation at the SMM stage is likely to be included in guidelines soon and underlines the necessity for accurate risk stratification in SMM. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kampanis: The Binding Site: Current Employment. Hultcrantz: Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Curio Science LLC: Consultancy; Intellisphere LLC: Consultancy. Durie: Amgen: Other: fees from non-CME/CE services ; Amgen, Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Takeda: Consultancy. Harding: The Binding Site: Current Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Landgren: Janssen: Research Funding; Janssen: Other: IDMC; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Other: IDMC; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria. Kristinsson: Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Heavy and Light Chain Monitoring in High Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM-CESAR Trial: Comparison with Conventional and Minimal Residual Disease IMWG Response Assessment

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128655 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1852-1852

Author(s):

Noemi Puig ◽

Teresa Contreras ◽

Bruno Paiva ◽

María Teresa Cedena ◽

José J Pérez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Response Assessment ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Minimal Residual

Introduction: The GEM-CESAR trial is a potentially curative strategy for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (HRsMM) patients (pts) in which the primary endpoint is the achievement of bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. However, other methods of disease evaluation in serum such as heavy+light chain (HLC) assessment, with a potential complementary value to the IMWG response criteria, have also been tested. Aim: To evaluate the performance of HLC assay in HRsMM pts at diagnosis and after consolidation, comparing the results with standard serological methods and Next Generation Flow (NGF) for the assessment of bone marrow MRD. Patients and Methods: Ninety HRsMM pts included in the GEM-CESAR trial received six 4-weeks cycles of carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone followed by high dose melphalan and 2 further cycles of consolidation with the same regimen. All pts received maintenance treatment with lenalidomide for up to 2 years. SPEP and IFE were performed using standard procedures. Serum IgGk, IgGl, IgAk and IgAl HLC concentrations were measured using Hevylite (The Binding Site Group Ltd, Birmingham, UK) on a SPA PLUS turbidimeter. HLC concentrations and ratios were considered abnormal if they were outside the 95% reference ranges provided by the manufacturer. MRD was analyzed by flow cytometry following EuroFlow recommendations (sensitivity, 2x10-6). Standard response assignment was carried out as per the IMWG guidelines. Hevylite responses were assigned and HLC-pair suppression was defined as in Michalet et al (Leukemia 2018). Results: Out of 90 HRsMM pts, 75 had monoclonal intact immunoglobulin and samples available at diagnosis (50 IgG and 25 IgA). HLC ratio was abnormal in 98% of IgG pts and in 100% of IgA pts. Response assessment by Hevylite and standard IMWG criteria were available in 62 pts post-consolidation (Table 1). A good agreement was found between the two methods (kappa quadratic weighting = 0,6327 (0,4016 - 0,8638)). Among 46 pts with assigned CR as per the IMWG response criteria, there were 3 and 8 pts in PR and VGPR according to the Hevylite method, respectively. In 62 cases, paired Hevylite and MRD assessment data were available. Concordant results were found in 72.5% of cases (45/62; HLC+/NGF+ in 15 and HLC-/NGF- in 30 cases) while in the remaining 27.4% of cases results were discordant (17/62; HLC-/NGF+ in 6 and HLC+/NGF- in 11 cases). Post-consolidation, 24, 25.8 and 42.3% of the 62 samples were positive by SPEP, NGF and Hevylite, respectively. HLC-pair suppression was identified in 13/62 pts; 10 had severe HLC-pair suppression at the end of consolidation. After a median follow-up of 32 months (8-128), 93% of pts remain alive and progression-free. Three patients that have already progressed had their responses assessed post-consolidation. The first pt was assigned VGPR by the standard IMWG criteria and PR by Hevylite and was MRD positive by NGF; the second pt was assigned CR by IMWG criteria and Hevylite but had severe HLC-pair immunosuppression and was MRD positive by NGF; the third pt was in CR by IMWG and HLC criteria and was MRD positive by MFC. Conclusions: Moderate agreement was found between response assessment by Hevylite and the standard IMWG methods as well as between Hevylite and MRD assessment by NGF. Most discordances were a result of Hevylite detecting disease in samples negative by the standard methods, but longer follow-up is needed to ascertain its clinical value. HLC assessment could have anticipated the progression noted in 2 (out of 3) patients. Disclosures Puig: Takeda, Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; The Binding Site: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Paiva:Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi and Takeda: Consultancy. Rodriguez Otero:Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy. Oriol:Celgene, Amgen, Takeda, Jansse: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Rios:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alegre:Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. de la Rubia:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy. De Arriba:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Ocio:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bladé:Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Irctures: Honoraria. Mateos:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmamar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; EDO: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

A Multicenter Phase II Single Arm Trial of Isatuximab in Patients with High Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (HRSMM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123205 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3116-3116 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Elisabet E. Manasanch ◽

Sundar Jagannath ◽

Hans C. Lee ◽

Krina K. Patel ◽

Connor Graham ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Infusion Reaction ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Myeloma Cells ◽

History Of ◽

Smoldering Myeloma

Background High risk smoldering multiple myeloma (HRSMM), defined as having immunoparesis and at least 95% abnormal plasma cells/all plasma cells by advanced flow cytometry, has a risk of progression to multiple myeloma of about 75% after 5 years of diagnosis. These patient have no symptoms and current standard is to follow them without treatment. Isatuximab is an IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds to CD38 highly expressed in myeloma cells. Isatuximab has activity as monotherapy (overall response rate (ORR) 35%), with lenalidomide/dexamethasone (ORR 56%) and pomalidomide/dexamethasone (ORR 62%) in relapsed MM. We designed a phase II study to test the efficacy of isatuximab in high risk smoldering myeloma. Our study is registered in clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02960555. Methods The primary endpoint of the study is the ORR of isatuximab 20 mg/kg IV days 1, 8, 15, 22 cycle 1; days 1, 15 cycles 2-6 and day 1 cycles 7-30 in high risk smoldering myeloma. 24 patients were accrued in the first stage (of maximum 61 patients). Secondary endpoints are PFS, OS, clinical benefit rate (CBR). Exploratory endpoints are quality of life analysis (QoL), MRD, molecular/immune characterization using DNA/RNA sequencing of myeloma cells and the microenvironment before and after treatment. Results 24 patients with HRSMM were accrued from 02/08/2017 until 12/21/2018 (Table 1). All patients are evaluable for response. Best responses: ORR (≥PR) 15(62.5%), CR MRD- flow at 10-5 1 (5%), VGPR 4 (17%), PR 10 (42%), minor response (MR) 4 (18%), stable disease 5 (21%); CBR (≥MR) 79%. Median number of cycles received were 11.5 (range 6-30). Five patients have stopped treatment (one has completed the study, one with heavy history of smoking was diagnosed with squamous cell cancer of the tongue, one could no longer travel to treatments due to relocation, two progressed to active multiple myeloma after 16 and 6 cycles of treatment, respectively). There have been no deaths. DNA/RNA seq is ongoing for biomarkers of response. There were 5 grade 3 severe treatment-related adverse events (RAE) which resolved to baseline: dyspnea -related to infusion reaction (n=2), headache (n=1), ANC decrease (n=1), urinary tract infection (n=1). Most common grade 1-2 related adverse events (n): nausea (7), vomit (5), WBC decrease (3), diarrhea (3), fatigue (6), headache (4), mucositis (4), myalgia (4) and infusion reaction (3). In patients with available QoL functional scores (n=9 at baseline and n=7 after 6 months of therapy), isatuximab was effective in reducing their anxiety and worry of progression to multiple myeloma. Isatuximab also improved general QoL scores by the end of cycle 6 of treatment which were now comparable to those in the general population (Figure 1). Conclusion Isatuximab is very well tolerated, results in high response rates in HRSMM and has the potential to change the natural history of this disease. In ongoing QoL analysis, initial data shows improvement in QoL and decreased cancer worry after isatuximab treatment. Immune-genomic analysis is ongoing and may identify patients that benefit the most from treatment. Disclosures Manasanch: celgene: Honoraria; merck: Research Funding; quest diagnostics: Research Funding; sanofi: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Jagannath:Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Medicom: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy. Lee:Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline plc: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Patel:Poseida Therapeutics, Cellectis, Abbvie: Research Funding; Oncopeptides, Nektar, Precision Biosciences, BMS: Consultancy; Takeda, Celgene, Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kaufman:Janssen: Other: travel/lodging, Research Funding. Thomas:Xencor: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Mailankody:Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Lendvai:Janssen: Employment. Neelapu:Acerta: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Allogene: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Unum Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy. Orlowski:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Landgren:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Theradex: Other: IDMC; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Other: IDMC. OffLabel Disclosure: Isatuximab for the treatment of smoldering myeloma

Download Full-text

Crowdsourced High-Risk Classifiers for Multiple Myeloma Patients Commonly Identify PHF19 As a Robust Progression Biomarker

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127362 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4370-4370

Author(s):

Michael J Mason ◽

Carolina D. Schinke ◽

Christine Eng ◽

Fadi Towfic ◽

Fred Gruber ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

High Risk ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy of terminally differentiated plasma cells residing within the bone marrow with 25,000-30,000 patients diagnosed in the United States each year. The disease's clinical course depends on a complex interplay chromosomal abnormalities and mutations within plasma cells and patient socio-demographic factors. Novel treatments extended the time to disease progression and overall survival for the majority of patients. However, a subset of 15%-20% of MM patients exhibit an aggressive disease course with rapid disease progression and poor overall survival regardless of treatment. Accurately predicting which patients are at high-risk is critical to designing studies with a better understanding of myeloma progression and enabling the discovery of novel therapeutics that extend the progression free period of these patients. To date, most MM risk models use patient demographic data, clinical laboratory results and cytogenetic assays to predict clinical outcome. High-risk associated cytogenetic alterations include deletion of 17p or gain of 1q as well as t(14;16), t(14;20), and most commonly t(4,14), which leads to juxtaposition of MMSET with the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus promoter, resulting in overexpression of the MMSET oncogene. While cytogenetic assays, in particular fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), are widely available, their risk prediction is sub-optimal and recently developed gene expression based classifiers predict more accurately rapid progression. To investigate possible improvements to models of myeloma risk, we organized the Multiple Myeloma DREAM Challenge, focusing on predicting high-risk, defined as disease progression or death prior to 18 months from diagnosis. This effort combined 4 discovery datasets providing participants with clinical, cytogenetic, demographic and gene expression data to facilitate model development while retaining 4 additional datasets, whose clinical outcome was not publicly available, in order to benchmark submitted models. This crowd-sourced effort resulted in the unbiased assessment of 171 predictive algorithms on the validation dataset (N = 823 unique patient samples). Analysis of top performing methods identified high expression of PHF19, a histone methyltransferase, as the gene most strongly associated with disease progression, showing greater predictive power than the expression level of the putative high-risk gene MMSET. We show that a simple 4 feature model composed of age, stage and the gene expression of PHF19 and MMSET is as accurate as much larger published models composed of over 50 genes combined with ISS and age. Results from this work suggest that combination of gene expression and clinical data increases accuracy of high risk models which would improve patient selection in the clinic. Disclosures Towfic: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dalton:MILLENNIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.: Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Stiftung: Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding. Avet-Loiseau:takeda: Consultancy, Other: travel fees, lecture fees, Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Other: travel fees, lecture fees, Research Funding. Ortiz:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trotter:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dervan:Celgene: Employment. Flynt:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dai:M2Gen: Employment. Bassett:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sonneveld:SkylineDx: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shain:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy. Munshi:Abbvie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Morgan:Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene Corporation, Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen, Janssen, Takeda, Celgene Corporation: Other: Travel expenses. Walker:Celgene: Research Funding. Thakurta:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text