Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous (SC) Blinatumomab for the Treatment of Adults with Relapsed or Refractory B Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (R/R B-ALL)

Abstract Background Blinatumomab is a BiTE ® (bispecific T cell engager) molecule that engages patients' T cells to the CD19 antigen on lymphoid tumor cells. Blinatumomab administered as a 28-day continuous intravenous infusion (cIV) is approved in multiple regions for the treatment of R/R B-ALL in adults and children. Subcutaneous delivery may improve the convenience and satisfaction of patients with R/R B-ALL who are candidates for blinatumomab therapy. Here we report the results from the first cohort of adults with R/R B-ALL receiving SC blinatumomab. Methods In this ongoing multicenter, single arm, open-label, phase 1b dose-finding study (NCT04521231), patients received multiple cycles of SC blinatumomab. Each cycle included a treatment period and a treatment-free interval. In cohort 1, cycle 1, patients received a lower first dose of SC blinatumomab for several days followed by a higher dose multiple times weekly; in subsequent cycles, patients received the higher dose several times weekly during the treatment period. Bone marrow (BM) evaluation was performed on day 27 of each cycle. Results Six patients from cohort 1 were included in this June 22, 2021 data cutoff. Median age was 64 (range 38-83) years. The number of prior therapies ranged from 2-4. Two patients had disease refractory to primary therapy or salvage therapy, 2 patients relapsed after chemotherapy, and 2 patients relapsed after prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Median BM blast count at study start was 85% (range 28%-95%). Only 1 patient had <50% BM blasts (BM blasts=28%). At enrollment, all patients had an ECOG score of 0-1. The median number of SC blinatumomab cycles initiated was 1 (range 1-3). Preliminary pharmacokinetic results support the SC dosing intervals used in this study and potentially longer intervals. Exposures for SC doses were similar to the efficacious exposures of the approved cIV regimen: mean average concentrations at steady state of 215 and 853 pg/mL for the lower and higher SC dosing regimens of cohort 1, respectively, vs mean steady state concentrations of 228 and 616 pg/mL for 9 and 28 µg/day cIV dosing, respectively. The pharmacodynamic profile following SC blinatumomab of peripheral immune cell redistribution (circulating CD3+ and CD8+ CD69+ T cells), transient cytokine elevation (IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ) and CD19+ B cell counts declining below the detection limit was consistent with the historical pharmacodynamic profile following cIV blinatumomab. No grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome events were reported (Table). One patient developed herpes encephalitis and experienced a grade 5 neurological event unrelated to blinatumomab; no other neurological events were reported. Two patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events (injection site reaction in patient with no response, hyperleukocytosis due to disease progression). Three patients had complete hematological response (CR) with no measurable residual disease (MRD) (<10 -4) within 2 cycles and 1 patient had a morphological partial response (95% BM blasts at start of cycle 1 to 22% blasts on day 15). This patient discontinued on day 15 of cycle 1 after progression of extramedullary disease. At the time of the data cutoff, 2 patients remained on study. These patients had CR with no MRD. Conclusions In this phase 1b dose-finding study, SC blinatumomab has demonstrated encouraging anti-leukemia activity in heavily pretreated patients with R/R B-ALL. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic results support the use of SC dosing in this population. The safety profile was manageable and consistent with that reported for cIV blinatumomab. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gordon: Amgen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Schwartz: Morphosys: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Other: Travel grants, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel grants, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants, Speakers Bureau; BTG International Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD Sharp & Dohme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Basilea: Other: Travel grants. Rossi: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Huguet: Novartis: Other: Advisor; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisor; Celgene: Other: Advisor; BMS: Other: Advisor; Amgen: Other: Advisor; Pfizer: Other: Advisor. Hernández-Rivas: Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wong: Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Amgen: Current Employment. Markovic: Amgen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Katlinskaya: Amgen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Panwar: Amgen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zugmaier: Micromet/Amgen: Patents & Royalties: Patents 20190300609 and 20130323247 licensed; receives royalties of family members of international applications published as WO2010/052014; WO2010/052013; WO2011/051307; WO2012/055961; WO 2012/062596; WO2014/122251; and WO2015/181683; Amgen: Current Employment; Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Download Full-text

Phase I Dose-Finding Study of Eltrombopag Following High Dose Cytarabine and Mitoxantrone Chemotherapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152947 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4426-4426

Author(s):

Mahesh Swaminathan ◽

Amanda Przespolewski ◽

Elizabeth A. Griffiths ◽

James E. Thompson ◽

Amro Elshoury ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Dose Finding ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

High Dose Cytarabine ◽

Finding Study ◽

Dose Finding Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Thrombocytopenia is prevalent at presentation and following induction chemotherapy (chemo) regimens in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Eltrombopag (EPAG), oral, nonpeptide thrombopoietin (TPO)-receptor agonist, is currently approved for treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia, hepatitis-associated thrombocytopenia, and aplastic anemia. It has also been evaluated as a strategy to mitigate chemo-induced thrombocytopenia in pts with solid tumors, myelodysplastic syndrome, and following allotransplant. Prior studies have demonstrated that EPAG can directly inhibit the proliferation of human AML cells in vitro. Although EPAG has been studied following induction and consolidation chemo in the frontline AML setting, to date, the tolerability and efficacy of EPAG in pts receiving salvage chemo for R/R AML is not known. Objectives: This study's objectives were to (a) estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and tolerability of EPAG, (b) examine platelet (plt) response (defined as plt count ≥ 100 x 10 9/L), and (c) anti-leukemic activity of EPAG in pts receiving high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) and mitoxantrone (Mito) for R/R AML. Methods: In this phase I open-label study, adult pts (³ 18 yrs) with R/R AML with adequate organ functions and grade 4 thrombocytopenia following HiDAC (given every 12 hrs (3 g/m 2 for age < 50; 1.5 g/m 2 for age ≥50) for 12 doses) and Mito (dosed at 12 mg/m 2 x 3 doses every other day) were eligible. All pts must have had marrow hypoplasia demonstrated on Day 14 ± 3 days from the initiation of HiDAC. EPAG was started daily on Day 14 ± 3 days with dose determined using a standard '3+3' dose-escalation design. EPAG was discontinued if an adequate plt response was achieved or following 9 weeks of therapy. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) window was defined as the first 15 days of EPAG dosing. Results: Nine pts with R/R AML were enrolled (Table 1). Median age was 64 yrs (range, 33-80), and 5 pts were men. All pts had intermediate (6/9, 67%), adverse (2/9, 22%), or unknown (1/9, 11%) cytogenetic risk disease. One (1/9) pt had NPM1+FLT3-ITD+ disease. Five pts (56%) had relapsed disease (2pts had prior allotransplant). All pts received HiDAC+Mito chemo and started on EPAG on Day 14 ± 3 days. Three received EPAG 150 mg, and 6 pts received 200 mg daily. The median duration on EPAG was 26 days (range, 11-82). One pt experienced a DLT of grade 3 myocardial ischemia while receiving EPAG 200 mg/day and was taken off study. No other DLTs were reported, and no MTD was determined. The most frequent grade ³3 adverse events (AEs, Table 2): were bacteremia (56%), neutropenic fever (44%), and hyperbilirubinemia (33%). Similarly, common grade 1-2 AEs consisted of hyperbilirubinemia, tachycardia, and confusion (33% each, respectively). At a median follow-up of 30.3 months (mo), all 9 pts had discontinued EPAG. Six pts (67%) achieved plt response (3 each in 150 mg and 200 mg/day dose level). The median time to achieve plt response and the duration of plt response was 27 days (range, 14-41) and 40.5 mo (range, 2-49.6), respectively. Three other pts discontinued EPAG therapy: 1 each due to cardiac ischemia, donor lymphocyte infusion, and patient choice, respectively (Table 3). Of note, 7/9 pts (78%) had clinical response: CR in 5 (56%), CRc (CR+CRp) in 6 (67%), MLFS in 1 (11%, Table 4). Two (2/7 responders) went on to subsequent allotransplant, and 6 died; 2-progressive disease, one each from pneumonia, failure to thrive, encephalopathy, and unknown cause, respectively. Among the 6 pts who achieved plt recovery on EPAG, 5 achieved CR and 1-MLFS following HiDAC+Mito. Conclusion: This phase 1 dose-finding study demonstrated that EPAG 150-200 mg daily following HiDAC+Mito chemo for R/R AML was well tolerated with one DLT of cardiac ischemia (200 mg dose). Two-thirds (67%) of pts achieved plt recovery on EPAG after a median of 27 days (range, 14-41). In these small number of pts (n=9), addition of EPAG therapy did not seem to adversely affect clinical outcomes (CRc 67%) and may have contributed to long-term platelet recovery. Further studies are required to determine the optimal schedule and potential benefit of EPAG added to chemo regimens for R/R AML. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Przespolewski: Jazz: Research Funding. Griffiths: Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Taiho Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Thompson: Novartis/ Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Elshoury: Bristol Meyers Squibb: Other: advisory board. Wang: Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Kura Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, steering committee, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mana Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; DAVA Oncology: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data safety monitoring committee; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Genentech: Consultancy; MacroGenics: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Expand: a Phase 1b, Open-Label, Dose-Finding Study of Ruxolitinib in Patients with Myelofibrosis and Baseline Platelet Counts Between 50 × 109/L and 99 × 109/L

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.177.177 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 177-177 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Claire N Harrison ◽

Heinz Gisslinger ◽

Carole B. Miller ◽

Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽

Edric Atienza ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Dose Finding ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Starting Dose ◽

Finding Study ◽

Label Dose ◽

Phase 1B

Abstract Abstract 177 Background: Ruxolitinib (rux) is a potent oral JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor that has demonstrated superiority over traditional therapies for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF). In the two phase 3 COMFORT studies, rux demonstrated rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly and improved MF-related symptoms and quality of life. Although there has been considerable experience in patients (pts) who developed thrombocytopenia in the COMFORT studies, there has been limited experience in pts with baseline thrombocytopenia as those with platelet counts (PLTs) < 100 × 109/L were excluded. The aims of EXPAND are to evaluate the safety of rux and to establish the maximum safe starting dose (MSSD) in thrombocytopenic MF pts. Methods: Phase 1b, open-label, dose-finding study (NCT01317875) in pts with PMF, PPV-MF, or PET-MF and baseline PLTs 50–99 × 109/L. A Bayesian logistic regression model will be used to guide dose-escalation decisions; intra-pt dose modification is allowed during the study. The study consists of 2 phases: dose escalation and safety expansion. Starting dose of rux is 5 mg bid with a maximum of 15 mg bid. In the dose-escalation phase, cohorts will be: 5 mg bid, 5 mg AM/10 mg PM, 10 mg bid, 10 mg AM/15 mg PM, and 15 mg bid. Pts are assigned to 1 of 2 strata based on their baseline PLTs: stratum 1, 75–99 × 109/L; stratum 2, 50–74 × 109/L. Each dose level in the second stratum will be open only if both that dose and the following one are deemed safe in the first stratum. In the safety-expansion phase, 20 additional pts (10 in each stratum) will be treated at the respective MSSD for their stratum. Results: 14 pts (PMF, n = 10; PPV-MF, n = 3; PET-MF, n = 1) have been enrolled in 4 cohorts: 4 pts in stratum 1/cohort 1 (5 mg bid), 3 in stratum 1/cohort 2 (5 mg AM/10 mg PM), 4 in stratum 1/cohort 3 (10 mg bid), and 3 in stratum 2/cohort 1 (5 mg bid). At baseline, all pts had an ECOG performance status of 0–2, and spleen length ranged from 5–30 cm below the costal margin. 12 pts have completed > 28 days of treatment and are evaluable. 2 pts were nonevaluable: 1 pt discontinued at day 6 due to granulocytic sarcoma, and 1 pt took an incorrect dosage from day 1 to 7 but treatment is ongoing. Reported adverse events (AEs) were similar to those previously seen with rux. 7 pts experienced grade 3/4 AEs (only 2 anemia events were study-drug related), and 4 pts experienced serious AEs (Table). The majority of hemoglobin and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) abnormalities were grade 1 or 2. No pt had a grade 4 decrease in PLTs or ANC; 2 pts experienced a grade 4 decrease in hemoglobin. No pt discontinued due to anemia, neutropenia, or thrombocytopenia. No hemorrhagic events were observed. The lowest PLTs across all pts ranged from 29–96 × 109/L. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. Reductions in spleen length were reported for all 12 evaluable pts and 1 ongoing nonevaluable pt. Splenomegaly completely resolved in 3 pts. Spleen length reductions were rapid and occurred within the first few weeks of therapy. Conclusions: In this study, no DLT has occurred with the first 3 dose levels in pts with PLTs 75–99 × 109/L or with the first dose level in pts with PLTs 50–74 × 109/L. Rux was generally well tolerated, similar to results reported in previous studies, and no pt has discontinued because of thrombocytopenia. The study is ongoing, and additional pts are being recruited for both strata. Pts are receiving dose levels approaching those approved for nonthrombocytopenic MF pts. Disclosures: Harrison: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; YM Bioscience: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding. Gisslinger:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Miller:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, development of educational presentations Other; Incyte: development of educational presentations, development of educational presentations Other. Kiladjian:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding. Atienza:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Stalbovskaya:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sirulnik:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Al-Ali:Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. McMullin:Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria. Verstovsek:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Results from a Phase 1/2, Open-Label, Dose-Finding Study of Pralatrexate and Oral Bexarotene in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.2677.2677 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 2677-2677

Author(s):

Madeleine Duvic ◽

Steven M Horwitz ◽

Youn H Kim ◽

Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽

Gajanan Bhat ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Objective Response ◽

Dose Finding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Finding Study ◽

Dose Finding Study ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Ecog Ps

Abstract Background: Cutaneous T-cell Lymphomas (CTCL) include several variants of extra-nodal non-Hodgkin's lymphomas characterized by their skin lesions and T-cell surface markers. The most common, mycosis fungoides (MF), often has an indolent course but can transform and rapidly disseminate. While skin-directed therapies are effective for early-stage MF, patients with refractory, transformed or late-stage disease require systemic therapy. Methods: Adult patients with CTCL including MF, transformed MF (T-MF), Sézary syndrome (SS), primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), ≥ 1 prior systemic therapy, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≤ 2 were eligible and signed consent. FOL was administered weekly via intravenous push for 3 of 4 weeks; BEX was self-administered orally with food. The standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), with cohort expansion for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The MTD was the highest dose with < 33% DLT incidence in any cohort. DLTs included the following in Cycle 1: ≥ Grade 3 neutropenia (or G-CSF administered), thrombocytopenia, treatment-related non-hematologic toxicity, hyperlipidemia, or hypothyroidism, and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) causing BEX dose omission for ≥10/28 days or FOL dose omission/reduction. Results: In Cohort 1 (15 mg/m2 FOL + 150 mg/m2 BEX), 0/3 patients had DLTs. In Cohort 2a (15 mg/m2 FOL + 300 mg/m2 BEX), 2/3 patients had DLTs: Grade 3 neutropenia and Grade 2 hypotension (n = 1) and Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (n = 1). Therefore, the combination MTD was identified as 15 mg/m2 + 150 mg/m2. An additional 28 patients were enrolled at the MTD for a total of 34 patients (53% male, 47% female) in the study; all have discontinued treatment. The median age was 66 (range 39-85) years, and the median number of prior therapies was 4 (range 2-14). Histology included MF (53%), T-MF (32%), SS (12%), and ALCL (3%). ECOG PS was 0 (68%), 1 (18%), or 2 (15%). Patients received a median of 6 (range 1-33) cycles of therapy. All patients reported ≥ 1 AE. The most common (>20%) FOL-related AEs were mucositis or mucosal inflammation (68%), fatigue (41%), neutropenia and nausea (32% each), and anemia (24%). The most common (>20%) BEX-related AEs were hypertriglyceridemia (56%), fatigue (44%), neutropenia (32%), nausea (26%), and uncorrected hypothyroidism (24%). Grade 3 and 4 AEs were reported for 79% and 9% of patients, respectively: neutropenia (29% and 6%), hypertriglyceridemia (29% and 0%), and stomatitis (21% and 0%) and one Grade 5 AE of respiratory failure. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported for 35% of all patients; SAEs in > 1 patient were neutropenia and hypotension (6% each). Dose omissions and reductions for AEs were required for 74% and 21% of patients, respectively. AEs led to discontinuation for 32% of all patients, most commonly stomatitis (9%) and anemia, fatigue, and neutropenia (6% each). The overall Objective Response Rate was 61% (20/33 evaluable patients); 18/30 [60%] in Cohort 1 and 2/3 [67%] in Cohort 2. Four [12%] patients had a complete response, 16 [48%] partial response, 11 [33%] stable disease, and 2 [6%] progressive disease. Duration of Response ranged from 0-29+ months; median Response Duration was not reached, as 14 patients (3 CRs, 11 PRs) remained in response. Median PFS at the MTD was 12.8 (range 0.5-29.9+) months. Table 1. Response by CTCL Subtype Objective Response Rates CTCL Subtype Overall CR PR All Evaluable, n=33 20 (61%) 4 16 ALCL, n = 1 1 (100%) 1 0 MF, n = 19 12 (63%) 2 10 T-MF, n = 10 5 (50%) 1 4 SS, n = 3 2 (67%) 0 2 Conclusions: The combination of FOL + BEX was well tolerated and efficacious in patients with various CTCL subtypes, as measured by response rates (61% including patients with durable CRs) in this dose-finding study. Disclosures Duvic: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Therakos: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Co: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Consultancy; Allos (spectrum): Research Funding; Rhizen Pharma: Research Funding; Spatz Foundation: Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Research Funding; Tetralogics SHAPE: Research Funding; Cell Medica Ltd: Consultancy; Soligenics: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; MiRagen Therapeutics: Consultancy; Huya Bioscience Int'l: Consultancy. Bhat:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment.

Download Full-text

An Open-Label, Phase 2, Dose-Finding Study of Sotatercept (ACE-011) in Patients with Low or Intermediate-1 (Int-1)-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) or Non-Proliferative Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) and Anemia Requiring Transfusion

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.3251.3251 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 3251-3251 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Rami S Komrokji ◽

Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽

Lionel Ades ◽

Abderrahmane Laadem ◽

Bond Vo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Dose Finding ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Treatment Start ◽

Finding Study ◽

Dose Finding Study ◽

Dose Levels

Abstract Introduction: Anemia, a hallmark of MDS, is challenging to treat, particularly after failure of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). Sotatercept (ACE-011) is a novel and first-in-class activin type IIA receptor fusion protein that acts on late-stage erythropoiesis to increase mature erythrocyte release into the circulation (Carrancio et al. Br J Haematol 2014;165:870-82). Treatment with sotatercept stimulated erythropoiesis and significantly increased hemoglobin (Hb) levels in healthy volunteers (Sherman et al. J Clin Pharmacol 2013;53:1121-30), supporting its clinical development for the treatment of anemia in patients (pts) with lower-risk MDS. Methods: The primary objective of this phase 2, open-label, dose-finding study is to determine a safe, tolerable, and effective dose of sotatercept resulting in erythroid hematological improvement (HI-E; modified IWG 2006 criteria) in pts with anemia and IPSS-defined Low or Int-1-risk MDS or non-proliferative CMML (white blood cells < 13,000/µL). Secondary objectives include rate of RBC-transfusion independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 8 weeks. Eligible pts had anemia (≥ 2 RBC units transfusion requirement in the 12 weeks prior to enrollment for Hb ≤ 9.0 g/dL) with no response, loss of response, or low chance of response to ESAs (serum erythropoietin [EPO] > 500 mIU/mL). Pts received subcutaneous sotatercept at dose levels of 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, or 1.0 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01736683. Results: As of May 22, 2014, a total of 54 MDS pts were enrolled: 7, 6, 21, and 20 in the sotatercept 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg dose groups, respectively. Median age was 71 years (range 56–86) and median time from diagnosis was 4 years (range 0–31); most pts were male (70%). Pts received a median of 6 RBC units (range 0–18) in the 8 weeks prior to treatment start. Forty-five pts (83%) received ≥ 4 RBC units in the 8 weeks prior to treatment start (high transfusion burden; HTB), and 9 pts (17%) received < 4 units in the 8 weeks prior to treatment start (low transfusion burden; LTB). Nineteen pts (35%) had IPSS Low and 34 pts (63%) had IPSS Int-1-risk MDS; IPSS risk data were missing for 1 pt. Fifty-one pts (94%) had prior treatment with ESAs, 30 (56%) with hypomethylating agents, 26 (48%) with lenalidomide, and 26 (48%) with other MDS treatments; 15 pts (28%) had serum EPO > 500 mIU/mL. Of the 53 pts evaluable for efficacy, HI-E was observed in 21 pts (40%) overall: 0, 4 (67%), 8 (40%), and 9 pts (45%) in the sotatercept 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg dose groups, respectively. Nineteen of 44 HTB pts responded with a ≥ 4 RBC units/8 weeks transfusion burden reduction; duration of transfusion response appeared to be dose-dependent. Five HTB pts achieved RBC-TI ≥ 8 weeks, with RBC-TI duration ranging from 59–345+ days. Eight of 9 LTB pts showed Hb increases, not influenced by transfusion, ranging from 1.3–3.8 g/dL. Of these, 2 pts had a Hb increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL sustained for ≥ 8 weeks. Pts with Hb > 11.0 g/dL were subject to dose delay per protocol, which may have impacted Hb increase sustainability. RBC-TI ≥ 8 weeks was achieved in 6 LTB pts. Increases in platelet and neutrophil levels were seen in pts with baseline thrombocytopenia and pts with baseline neutropenia, respectively. Sotatercept was generally well tolerated. Twenty pts (37%) reported ≥ 1 suspected treatment-related adverse event (AE); fatigue (11%), headache (9.3%), decreased appetite (7.4%), and nausea (7.4%) were the most common. Of 35 pts (65%) who discontinued treatment, 28 discontinued due to lack of therapeutic effect and 4 due to AEs. Of those AEs leading to discontinuation, 3 were suspected to be treatment-related: 1 pt with grade 2 hemolytic anemia, 1 pt with grade 3 hypertension, and 1 pt with grade 2 muscular weakness in the sotatercept 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg dose groups, respectively. Other reasons for discontinuation were withdrawal of consent (n = 2; 4%) and pt decision (n = 1; 2%). Conclusions: Sotatercept was well tolerated in lower-risk MDS pts at the dose levels tested, with promising evidence of clinical activity in this largely HTB cohort of ESA-refractory, anemic, lower-risk MDS pts. Further exploration of higher sotatercept dose levels and longer-term treatment is planned. PF and AFL contributed equally to this abstract as senior co-authors. Disclosures Komrokji: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Sotatercept (ACE-011) is an investigational agent that is being assessed for efficacy and safety in myelodysplastic syndromes.. Garcia-Manero:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Ades:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Laadem:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vo:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Prebet:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Boyd:US Oncology: Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer-Ingelheim Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Beyne-Rauzy:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Zou:Celgene: Employment. Attie:Acceleron Pharma: Employment. Sherman:Acceleron Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fenaux:Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. List:Celgene: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

V-FAST: A Phase 1b Master Trial to Investigate CPX-351 Combined with Various Targeted Agents in Patients with Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136868 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 26-28

Author(s):

Tara Lin ◽

Gabriel N. Mannis ◽

Harry P. Erba ◽

Mark Levis ◽

Heng Zou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Targeted Therapies ◽

Research Funding ◽

Steering Committee ◽

Targeted Agents ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Remission Rates ◽

Targeted Agent ◽

Phase 1B

Introduction: CPX-351 (Vyxeos®; daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome for injection), a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine in a synergistic 1:5 molar drug ratio, has been approved by the US FDA and EMA for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed therapy-related AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes. A randomized phase 3 study that evaluated patients 60 to 75 years of age with newly diagnosed high-risk/secondary AML provided the basis for approval and demonstrated that induction followed by consolidation with CPX-351 significantly improved overall survival and remission rates versus conventional 7+3, with a comparable safety profile. Several targeted therapies have demonstrated efficacy when added to cytotoxic therapy for the treatment of patients with previously untreated AML, including venetoclax (Venclexta®/Venclyxto®; a B-cell leukemia/lymphoma-2 [BCL-2] inhibitor), midostaurin (Rydapt®; a FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3 [FLT3] inhibitor), and enasidenib (Idhifa®; an isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 [IDH2] inhibitor). Preclinical data indicate synergistic activity may be achieved with CPX-351 in combination with venetoclax or midostaurin. Results of these studies suggest a rationale for the combination of targeted therapies using CPX-351 as a chemotherapy backbone. Study Design and Methods: V-FAST (Vyxeos - First Phase Assessment with Targeted Agents) is an open-label, multicenter, multi-arm, nonrandomized, phase 1b master trial (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT04075747) to evaluate CPX-351 in combination with targeted agents (venetoclax, midostaurin, or enasidenib) in adults with previously untreated AML who are considered fit for intensive chemotherapy. As V-FAST is a master trial, it is designed to permit the expedited incorporation of CPX-351 combinations with other targeted agents into the study as it proceeds, thus ensuring a timely investigation of novel combinations moving forward. Key eligibility criteria are shown in Table 1. The primary study endpoints are to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and safety of each combination regimen. Secondary endpoints include remission rates (via morphologic assessment), bone marrow measurable residual disease status, and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory endpoints include duration of remission, overall survival, event-free survival, and the proportion of patients proceeding to hematopoietic cell transplantation. Patients will be monitored for safety until 1 month following the end of treatment and survival for up to 2 years following the first administration of treatment. Cytogenetic and/or molecular testing will determine which treatment arm each patient is assigned to (ie, no FLT3 or IDH2 mutations: CPX-351 plus venetoclax; FLT3 mutation: CPX-351 plus midostaurin; IDH2 mutation: CPX-351 plus enasidenib). For each combination, a dose-exploration phase (standard 3+3 design; up to 12 patients/combination) will employ dose de-escalation or escalation of CPX-351 and/or the targeted agent based on the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities to determine a RP2D and evaluate the safety of the combination. The initial cohort for each arm will be treated with the dosing described in Table 2. In the subsequent expansion phase for each combination, an additional 20 patients will be treated to confirm the RP2D, further evaluate safety, and provide an initial assessment of efficacy. In both study phases, CPX-351 will be administered intravenously by 90-minute infusion on Days 1, 3, and 5; targeted therapies will be administered per a standard route for each agent. Patients may receive 1 to 2 induction cycles of combination therapy. Those achieving remission may receive up to 2 consolidation cycles with CPX-351 plus the targeted agent received during induction; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is permitted in place of or following chemotherapy consolidation at the discretion of the treating physician. This study is ongoing and actively enrolling patients. Disclosures Lin: Celgene: Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Mateon Therapeutics: Research Funding; Prescient Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Celyad: Research Funding; Genetech-Roche: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Trovagene: Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Bio-Path Holdings: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding. Mannis:AbbVie, Agios, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech: Consultancy; Glycomimetics, Forty Seven, Inc, Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Erba:Glycomimetics: Other: member of Scientific Steering Committee; AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo, Forma, ImmunoGen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, MacroGenics, Novartis, PTC: Research Funding; AbbVie, Agios, Celgene, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, Agios, Amgen, Astellas, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Glycomimetics, ImmunoGen, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, MacroGenics, Novartis, and Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Other: chair of the Scientific Steering Committee; Covance (AbbVie): Other: chair of the Independent Review Committee. Levis:Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; FujiFilm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Menarini: Honoraria. Zou:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Faderl:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Cheung:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Pullarkat:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Dova: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: This study will explore CPX-351 in combination with targeted agents for the treatment of adults with AML.

Download Full-text

PTG-300 Eliminates the Need for Therapeutic Phlebotomy in Both Low and High-Risk Polycythemia Vera Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-137285 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 33-35 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Marina Kremyanskaya ◽

Yelena Ginzburg ◽

Andrew T. Kuykendall ◽

Abdulraheem Yacoub ◽

Jay Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Iron Deficiency ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Dose Finding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Trial

Background. Polycythemia vera (PV) patients are treated with periodic therapeutic phlebotomy (TP) in order to maintain hematocrit levels <45% in an effort to reduce the incidence of thrombotic events [Marchioli NEJM 2013]. Since, they are seen periodically, PV patients likely spend significant time with hematocrit levels >45%, thereby potentially increasing their risk of thrombosis. Symptomatic iron deficiency represents a challenge in PV as it is commonly present at diagnosis [Ginzburg Leukemia 2018] and worsens after repeated and/or frequent TP, and often symptomatic from their iron deficiency. We hypothesized that both iron deficiency and expanded erythropoiesis in PV lead to suppression of hepcidin, the body's main negative regulator of iron metabolism, and that hepcidin suppression enhances iron absorption and availability for enhanced erythropoiesis in TP-requiring PV patients. We previously demonstrated that PTG-300, a hepcidin-mimetic, caused dose-related anemia in preclinical studies. In a phase 2 trial in β-thalassemia, PTG-300 leads to a sustained (3-7 days) decrease in serum iron and transferrin saturation (TSAT) but did not demonstrate off-target effects. The current study aims to compare the iron status and phlebotomy requirements in high TP-requiring PV patients before and during treatment with PTG-300 (Figure 1). Methods. PTG-300-04 is a 3-part Phase 2 trial consisting of (1) a 28-week dose-finding; (2) a 12-week blinded randomized withdrawal (1:1) PTG-300 vs placebo; and (3) a 52-week open label extension (Figure 1). Eligibility criteria include PV diagnosis (by 2016 WHO criteria) and ≥3 phlebotomies with or without concurrent cytoreductive therapy to maintain hematocrit ≤45% in the 24 weeks prior to enrollment. PTG-300 doses of 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80 mg administered subcutaneously weekly were adjusted to maintain hematocrit <45%. Results. Thirteen subjects were enrolled to date: 7/13 with low risk, mean age 57.4 years (range 31-74). Six receiving TP alone, 6 concurrent hydroxyurea, 1 on concurrent interferon; TP in the 24 weeks prior to enrollment = 3-9; median time between TP = 42 days. After instruction, each of the patients self-administered the drug at home. Eight subjects have been treated for ≥3 months with PTG-300 (Figure 2a). Three subjects have been randomized. During the open label dose finding portion of the study, all subjects were phlebotomy-free with the exception of one subject. Three subjects completed part 1 (28 weeks) with no TP as compared to 3-5 TP required in a similar period prior to study initiation. During the 28-week dose-finding period, the hematocrit was continuously controlled below 45% in all but two subjects' (Figure 2b). Two subjects had hematocrits transiently >45% but remained below 45% after phlebotomy in one and dose increase in both. Furthermore, erythrocyte numbers decreased (Figure 2c) and MCV increased in all but two subjects. These findings suggest a redistribution of iron within erythropoiesis. Lastly, prior to treatment, mean iron-related parameters were consistent with systemic iron deficiency while serum ferritin increased progressively toward normal range. Most frequent adverse events were injection site reaction (ISR) reported by three patients. Most of the reactions were grade 1-2 and were transient in nature and no patient discontinued the drug. Conclusions. The current results indicate that PTG-300 is an effective agent for the treatment of PV, reversing iron deficiency and eliminating the need for TP in PV patients. Elimination of TP requirements for 7 months in TP-dependent PV patients is significant and unexpected. The effect of PTG-300 on PV-related symptoms is also being evaluated. Continued patient enrollment will enable more definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy and safety of hepcidin mimetic PTG-300 in PV patients with high TP requirements. PTG-300 looks very promising in eliminating the therapeutic phlebotomies in both low and high-risk patients. Disclosures Kremyanskaya: Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Protagonist Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Kuykendall:Blueprint Medicines: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Yacoub:Roche: Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Hylapharm: Current equity holder in private company; Cara Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Ardelyx: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Agios: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Dynavax: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Yang:AROG: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding; Protagonist: Research Funding. Gupta:Protagonist: Current Employment. Valone:Protagonist: Current Employment. Khanna:Protagonist: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Verstovsek:PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI Biopharma Corp: Research Funding; Protagonist Therapeutics: Research Funding; ItalPharma: Research Funding. Hoffman:Forbius: Consultancy; Dompe: Research Funding; Protagonist: Consultancy; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Effect of Moderate and Severe Hemophilia a on Daily Life in Children and Their Caregivers: A CHESS Paediatrics Study Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-134658 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 43-45

Author(s):

Kate Khair ◽

Francis Nissen ◽

Mariabeth Silkey ◽

Tom Burke ◽

Aijing Shang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Disease Burden ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Daily Life ◽

Social Activity ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Lost Work ◽

Hours Of Work

Introduction: Hemophilia A (HA) is a congenital bleeding disorder, caused by a deficiency in clotting factor VIII (FVIII) and characterized by uncontrolled bleeding and progressive joint damage. This analysis assesses the impact of disease burden on the daily life of children with hemophilia A (CwHA) and their caregivers, addressing a deficit of current research on this topic. Methods: The Cost of Haemophilia in Europe: a Socioeconomic Survey in a Paediatric Population (CHESS Paediatrics) is a retrospective, burden-of-illness study in children with moderate and severe HA (defined by endogenous FVIII [IU/dL] relative to normal; moderate, 1-5%; severe, <1%) across France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. CwHA were recruited and stratified by both age group (0-5 years:6-11 years:12-17 years=1:1:1) and disease severity (severe:moderate=approximately 2:1, prioritizing children with severe HA [CwSHA]). Data for this analysis were captured from physicians, children, and their caregivers. Physicians completed online case report forms for treated children, and the child and/or their caregivers completed a paper-based questionnaire utilizing 5-point Likert scales. For CwHA aged 0-7, the questionnaire was completed by the caregiver, while for CwHA aged 8-17, children and caregivers completed different sections. Hours of care provided by the caregiver and work lost by the caregiver were reported as median values due to non-normal data distribution. Informed consent was obtained for all participants. Upon review, the study was approved by the University of Chester ethical committee. Results: Data from child/caregiver questionnaires were available for 196 CwHA (moderate, 25.5%; severe, 74.5%); the majority of these children, as expected, were receiving prophylaxis (72.4%), and did not have FVIII inhibitors (89.8%; Table 1). There was a direct impact of disease burden on CwHA, particularly with regard to physical and social activities (Figure 1). Overall, it was agreed or strongly agreed by the child or caregiver that 48.0% and 57.5% of children with moderate HA (CwMHA) and CwSHA respectively, have reduced physical activity due to HA, and 46.0% and 57.5%, respectively, have reduced social activity due to HA. A total of 36.0% and 61.0% of CwMHA and CwSHA, respectively, had adapted their treatment in anticipation of physical or social activity (Table 1). Furthermore, 34.0% of CwMHA and 55.4% of CwSHA were frustrated due to their disease, and many (CwMHA, 36.0%; CwSHA, 50.7%) felt that they had missed opportunities (Figure 1). For 66.0% of CwMHA and 76.0% of CwSHA, it was reported that their daily life was compromised due to their HA. Caregivers provided a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 19.0 (10.0-59.5) and 12.0 (5.0-20.0) hours a week of care for the hemophilia-related needs of their CwMHA (n=30) or CwSHA (n=105), respectively. Of those who responded, 17.4% (n=4/23) and 25.0% (n=20/80) of caregivers to CwMHA or CwSHA, respectively, stated they have lost work due to their caregiving duty. This was more than twice as common for caregivers in families with multiple CwHA (42.9%, n=9/21 responses) compared with those in families with one CwHA (18.5%, n=15/81 responses). Median (IQR) hours of work per week estimated to be lost were 20.0 (17.0-22.0) for caregivers of CwMHA (n=4) and 12.5 (4.50-20.0) for caregivers of CwSHA (n=20). Conclusions: In conclusion, both children and caregivers make sacrifices in their daily lives due to HA; many CwHA reported reduced physical and social activities, fewer opportunities and feelings of frustration due to their HA. Caregivers reported spending a significant number of hours caring for their child and some reported losing work due to their caring responsibilities. However, some outcomes may be limited by the small number of respondents and narrow response options, particularly those regarding the caregiver burden. Responses on the hours of work lost may be subject to selection bias, as caregivers who have lost work may be more likely to respond to this question. Additionally, as this question is targeted at caregivers in employment, it is unknown if some caregivers have left employment due to their caregiving responsibilities. According to this analysis, children/caregivers are frequently required to adapt the child's treatment before the child engages in activities. Overall, the burden of disease was similar in children with moderate and severe HA. Disclosures Khair: Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Biomarin: Consultancy; HCD Economics: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medikhair: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding; Haemnet: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nissen:GSK: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Actelion: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment. Silkey:Aerotek AG: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy. Burke:HCD Economics: Current Employment; University of Chester: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy. Shang:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: All authors received support for third party writing assistance, furnished by Scott Battle, PhD, provided by F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.. Aizenas:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Meier:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. O'Hara:HCD Economics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy. Noone:Research Investigator PROBE: Research Funding; Healthcare Decision Consultants: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; European Haemophilia Consortium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

To Treat or Not to Treat? Understanding Treatment Patterns in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelofibrosis at the Time of Enrollment in the MOST Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-134958 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 49-51

Author(s):

Rami S. Komrokji ◽

Brady L. Stein ◽

Robyn M. Scherber ◽

Patricia Kalafut ◽

Haobo Ren ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Symptom Burden ◽

Risk Groups ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Low Risk ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Therapy Initiation

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by extramedullary hematopoiesis, bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, and diminished quality of life. Treatment decisions may involve a variety of factors including prognosis and symptomatology. Data regarding real-world disease and demographic factors that contribute to therapy initiation and choice in pts with lower risk MF are limited. This analysis of data from the ongoing Myelofibrosis and Essential Thrombocythemia Observational STudy (MOST; NCT02953704) assessed whether these factors differ for lower risk pts who were treated vs untreated at enrollment. Methods: MOST is a longitudinal, noninterventional, prospective, observational study in pts with MF or essential thrombocythemia enrolled at clinical practices within the US. Pts included in the analysis (≥18 y), had low risk MF by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS; Blood. 2010;115:1703), or intermediate-1 (INT-1) risk by age >65 y alone. Pt data were entered into an electronic case report form during usual-care visits over a planned 36-month observation period. Pt-reported symptom burden was assessed using the MPN-Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF); Total Symptom Score (TSS) was calculated (0 [absent] to 100 [worst imaginable]; J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:4098). Data were analyzed with basic descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Of 233 pts with MF enrolled at 124 sites between 11/29/2016 and 03/29/2019, 205 were included in this analysis; 28 were excluded for being INT-1 risk for reasons other than age. Of the 205 pts, 85 (41.5%) were low- and 120 (58.5%) were INT-1 risk; 56.5% (48/85) and 59.2% (71/120), respectively, were being treated at enrollment. Pt characteristics are listed in Table 1A. Fewer low- vs INT-1 risk pts were JAK2 V617F or MPL positive, and more were CALR positive. The proportion of pts with palpable splenomegaly was similar for treated low- and INT-1 risk pts. In low risk pts, the proportion of pts with palpable splenomegaly was higher in untreated vs treated pts; whereas, in INT-1 risk pts, the opposite was observed (ie, lower proportion in untreated vs treated pts). Blood counts were generally similar across cohorts, except median leukocytes were lower for low risk treated pts and platelet counts were elevated in low- vs INT-1 risk pts. The proportion of pts with comorbidities was similar across cohorts, except for fewer cardiovascular comorbidities in low- vs INT-1 risk pts. Mean TSS was lower in low- vs INT-1 risk pts, but the proportion of pts with TSS ≥20 was greater in treated vs untreated pts in both low- and INT-1 risk groups. Fatigue was the most severe pt-reported symptom in all cohorts. Differences in mean TSS and individual symptom scores between risk groups were not significant (P > 0.05), except itching was worse among INT-1 risk pts (P=0.03). Physician-reported signs and symptoms were generally more frequent for untreated vs treated pts, irrespective of risk (all P > 0.05). Most low risk (69.4%) and INT-1 risk pts (61.2%) who were currently untreated at enrollment had not received any prior MF-directed treatment (Table 1B); the most common prior treatment among currently untreated pts was hydroxyurea (HU) in both risk groups. Of currently treated pts, HU was the most common MF-directed monotherapy at enrollment in low-risk pts, and ruxolitinib was most common in INT-1 risk pts. No low risk pts and few INT-1 risk pts were currently receiving >1 MF-directed therapy at enrollment. Conclusion: These real-world data from pts with MF enrolled in MOST show that a substantial proportion of both low- and INT-1 risk pts who had received treatment before enrollment were not being treated at the time of enrollment. Although watch-and-wait is a therapeutic option, the finding that many of these lower risk pts had in fact received prior therapies suggests an unmet need for effective and tolerable second-line treatment options. Treated pts had greater pt-reported symptom burden vs untreated pts, which suggests that high symptom burden may contribute to the decision for treatment. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate symptom burden change with therapy initiation. In this regard, future analyses of data from MOST are planned to assess the longitudinal evolution of the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and management of pts with MF. Disclosures Komrokji: Geron: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Acceleron: Honoraria. Stein:Incyte: Research Funding; Kartos: Other: educational content presented; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmaessentia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scherber:Incyte Corporation: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Kalafut:Incyte: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ren:Incyte: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Verstovsek:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma Corp: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; ItalPharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Protagonist Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Steady-State Imatinib (IM) Trough Levels, Clinical Response, and Safety Between Caucasian and Asian Patients with Chronic Lyeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Treated with 400mg and 800mg Daily Doses of IM in the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Optimization and Selectivity (TOPS) Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1127.1127 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1127-1127

Author(s):

Dong-Wook Kim ◽

Camille Granvil ◽

Eren Demirhan ◽

John Reynolds ◽

Yu Jin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Event ◽

Steady State ◽

Clinical Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Average Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Trough Levels

Abstract Abstract 1127 Poster Board I-149 Background In the TOPS study, IM trough levels (Cmin) were collected from different race groups, mainly Caucasian and Asian, but also Black and others. Inter-ethnic differences in the PK of a drug are known to be important factors accounting for inter-individual variation in drug responsiveness. This analysis reports the comparison between Caucasian and Asian CML patients (pts) treated at doses of 400 mg QD and 400 mg bid (800 mg daily) of IM Cmin on Day 29 of initial treatment, clinical response, safety and tolerability. Methods Steady state IM Cmin on Day 29 and clinical response and safety data obtained during the first 12 months (mos) of treatment were obtained from pts randomized 2:1 to 800 mg or 400 mg daily IM. The steady-state Cmin was defined as predose concentration collected approximately within ±3 hours of the scheduled dosing time on Day 29. The associations of race with the rates of major molecular response (MMR) and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) were evaluated. Correlation of IM exposure with clinical response (MMR and CCyR) was assessed by grouping pts into quartiles based on their measured IM Cmin levels at Day 29. The safety endpoint for each pt was the presence or absence of an adverse event (AE) of grade 3 or higher in the first 12 mos from the first dose. Results IM Cmin levels were available from 229 pts in TOPS including 54 Caucasians, 18 Asians, and 14 Black and others at 400 mg (total 86) and 103 Caucasians, 29 Asians, and 11 Black and others at 800 mg (total 143). For the first 12 mos, the means of the average dose intensities for Asian (mean [range], 362 [267-400] in 400 mg and 666 [226-800] in 800 mg) were not significantly different from Caucasian (386 [204-597] in 400 mg and 666 [289-800] in 800 mg) (P=0.070 and P=0.995 for the 400 mg and 800 mg arms, respectively). Mean (± SD) of IM Cmin levels (ng/mL) with respect to race are shown in Table 1. IM Cmin was slightly over-proportional to dose and showed large interpatient variability (CV=42-60%) for both dose groups regardless of the race group. In the lower quartile Cmin group (Cmin<1290 ng/mL), the differences in CCyR and MMR rates between Asian and Caucasian pts were significant (P=0.031 and P=0.022 respectively), which was probably due to a higher rate of dose interruptions in the 1st 12 mos in Asian pts. A definitive conclusion cannot be drawn due to the small number of Asian pts. Occurrences of at least one grade 3 or 4 adverse event were found to be significantly higher in Asian pts (69% and 75% in the 1st 6 and 12 mos respectively) compared to Caucasian pts (53% and 57% in the 1st 6 and 12 mos respectively) (P=0.028 and P=0.008 respectively). Conclusion The results of this analysis from TOPS show that IM Cmin levels were similar between Caucasian and Asian CML pts in each treatment arm. There were no major differences in efficacy, as measured by MMR and CCyR rates by 12 mos, between Asian and Caucasian pts. There were no unexpected differences in patterns of AEs between Caucasian and Asian pts; however, occurrences of one or more grade 3 AEs were higher in Asian. Further analysis on a larger group of CML pts will be needed to evaluate the impact of AE rate differences between Caucasian and Asian pts. Disclosures Kim: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding. Granvil:Novartis: Employment. Demirhan:Novartis: Employment. Reynolds:Novartis: Employment. Jin:Novartis: Employment. Wang:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Baccarani:Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Mayer Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cortes-Franco:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Wyeth: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Druker:OHSU patent #843 - Mutate ABL Kinase Domains: Patents & Royalties; MolecularMD: Equity Ownership; Roche: Consultancy; Cylene Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Calistoga Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Avalon Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Ambit Biosciences: Consultancy; Millipore via Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: Patents & Royalties; Novartis, ARIAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Hughes:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding. Guilhot:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

a Phase 1b/2 Study of TAK-659, an Investigational Dual SYK and FLT-3 Inhibitor, in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (R/R AML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2834.2834 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2834-2834 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Jason B Kaplan ◽

Dale L. Bixby ◽

John C Morris ◽

Olga Frankfurt ◽

Jessica Altman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Tyrosine Kinase ◽

Pharmaceutical Company ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Company Limited ◽

Safety Population ◽

Wholly Owned Subsidiary ◽

Phase 1B

Abstract Background Spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) is a nonreceptor cytoplasmic protein kinase and a key mediator of immunoreceptor signaling that has been shown to play an important role in the pathogenesis of both B-cell and myeloid malignancies. SYK has also been shown to directly bind and activate FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT-3), a Class III receptor tyrosine kinase that is commonly mutated in approximately 30% of pts with AML (Puissant et al. Cancer Cell 2014;25:226-42). TAK-659 is an investigational, reversible, and potent dual inhibitor of SYK and FLT-3. Preclinical studies with TAK-659 have demonstrated growth inhibition of cell lines and xenograft tumor models of B-cell lymphoma or AML origin. Moreover, TAK-659 has exhibited antitumor activity in lymphoma pts in an ongoing clinical trial (Petrich et al. Blood 2015;126:2693). The primary objectives of the phase 1b dose-finding portion of this study are to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of TAK-659, as well as preliminary efficacy in the phase 2 expansion study. Secondary objectives include evaluation of TAK-659 pharmacokinetics (PK) in this pt population. Methods During dose escalation using a 3x3 schema, adult pts with R/R AML received oral TAK-659 daily (QD) in 28-d cycles (C) starting with a dose of 60 mg. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed per NCI-CTCAE v4.03. Response per IWG criteria for AML was assessed between d22 and d28 of C1, C2, and C4. Blood samples for plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments were collected pre-dose and at multiple times post-dose on d1 and d15 of C1. The pharmacodynamic effect of TAK-659 was assessed at multiple time points by measuring the phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 (pS6) in peripheral AML blasts using flow cytometry. FLT-3 mutation status (wild type [FLT-3-WT], FLT-3-ITD, or point mutation [FLT-3-D835Y]) was assessed using a PCR-based assay at a central laboratory. The effect of TAK-659 treatment on FLT-3-ITD phosphorylation was evaluated using a plasma inhibitory assay (PIA) as previously described (Levis et al. Blood 2006;108:3477-83). Results At data cut-off (June 9, 2016), 15 pts had been enrolled at TAK-659 QD 60 mg (n=4), 100 mg (n=7), or 120 mg (n=4). No dose-limiting toxicity per protocol has been observed. Dose escalation is currently ongoing at 160 mg QD. In the safety population (n=13), median age was 67 yrs (range 25-86), 69% of pts were male, and 38% had received ≥4 prior lines of therapy. Baseline mutation data was available for 12 pts: 6 pts were FLT-3-WT, 3 pts had FLT-3-ITD, 1 pt had FLT-3-D835Y, and 2 pts had concurrent FLT-3-ITD/D835Y mutations. In the safety population, all-grade drug-related AEs occurred in 12 (92%) pts overall; the most common were elevated AST (31%), ALT (23%), and amylase levels (23%). Grade ≥3 drug-related AEs occurred in 7 (54%) pts including: increased ALT, AST, and amylase levels, cataract, positive fungal test, macular fibrosis, pancreatitis, pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, rash, and fungal sinusitis (each 1pt). Blood LDH levels were increased in almost all pts (significance unknown). Three pts discontinued TAK-659 due to AEs and 3 pts died on study; none of these events were considered related to the study drug. Preliminary plasma PK of TAK-659 (n=11, 60-100 mg) was characterized by rapid absorption (median Tmax of 2 hours), moderate variability in steady-state exposures (42% coefficient of variation for C1 d15 dose-normalized AUCtau), and mean accumulation of 2.1-fold after repeated QD dosing for 15 days. Of 9 pts evaluated to date, pS6 was detected at baseline and reduced after dosing in 4 pts (2 FLT-3-ITD; 2 FLT-3-WT). At 60 mg and 100 mg TAK-659, up to 70% inhibition of FLT-3-ITD phosphorylation was observed as assessed by PIA. Early signs of clinical activity were observed, with decreases in peripheral blood myeloblasts observed in some pts. Assessment is ongoing and preliminary efficacy data will be presented. Conclusions TAK-659 has a unique mechanism of action with dual inhibition of SYK and FLT-3. Dose escalation to determine the MTD/RP2D is ongoing. TAK-659 exhibits an acceptable PK profile in R/R AML pts, supporting continuous oral QD dosing. Disclosures Kaplan: Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Morris:Boehringer-Ingelheim: Speakers Bureau. Altman:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syros: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wise-Draper:Merck: Research Funding. Collins:Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment. Kannan:Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment. Wang:Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment. Faucette:Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment. Lee:Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment. Shou:Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment. Levis:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text