Safety and Efficacy of Mitapivat (AG-348), an Oral Activator of Pyruvate Kinase R, in Subjects with Sickle Cell Disease: A Phase 2, Open-Label Study (ESTIMATE)

Abstract Background Sickle cell disease (SCD) is one of the most common and devastating inherited blood disorders characterized by a single nucleotide mutation in the beta-globin chain leading to the production of mutant hemoglobin S (HbS). HbS polymerizes upon deoxygenation causing red blood cells (RBC) to sickle which results in extremely painful episodes of vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC), severe hemolytic anemia, chronic multiorgan failure and a reduced life span. An important metabolic feature directly associated with RBC sickling is increased intracellular levels of the glycolytic intermediate 2,3-diphosphyglycerate (2,3-DPG) which promotes deoxygenation by lowering the oxygen affinity of hemoglobin (Hb). Pyruvate kinase R (PKR) is a key enzyme in RBC metabolism, generating adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to maintain energy homeostasis, membrane integrity and deformability, and modulates 2,3-DPG levels. Mitapivat (AG-348) is an oral, small molecule allosteric activator of PKR and shows promise as an anti-sickling agent in addition to its effect in PK deficiency and thalassemia. The safety and efficacy of mitapivat in subjects with SCD was evaluated in the dose finding period of this ongoing phase 2 study. Methods The ESTIMATE study is a phase 2, open-label study in which subjects ≥16 years with SCD (HbSS, HbS/β0, HbS/β+) with a baseline hemoglobin >6.1 g/dL and ≤11.1 g/dL, no chronic transfusion and adequate organ function were eligible. In the 8-week Dose Finding Period, initial dosing of mitapivat was 20 mg twice daily (BID). Subjects received a maximum of two sequential dose escalations of mitapivat (i.e. from 20 mg BID to 50 mg BID and 100 mg BID) depending on safety. The primary endpoints were safety, evaluated by frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs), and efficacy of mitapivat on RBC sickling. RBC sickling was evaluated by change in Point of Sickling (PoS), the pO2 at which sickling occurs as measured by oxygen gradient ektacytrometry on the Lorrca (RR Mechatronics). Secondary endpoints included changes in hematological parameters, levels of 2,3-DPG and ATP, Hb-oxygen affinity (p50) and surrogate markers of organ damage and mortality. Subjects who safely tolerated mitapivat and showed evidence of clinical improvement, were eligible to continue a 52-week follow-up period (Fixed Dose Extension Period). Results Six subjects have been enrolled as of September 2020 and completed the Dose Finding Period. All had homozygous HbSS except one patient who had HbS/β0-thalassemia. Baseline characteristics were: median age of 36 years (range 20-59 years), 4 (66.7%) were female and 5 (83.3%) were on stable-dose hydroxyurea. All subjects received dose escalation to a maximum dose of 100 mg BID. No serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred. Adverse events (AEs) were mild and often transient, with the most common treatment emergent AEs: transaminase increase (n=3 [50.0%], Grade 1), gastrointestinal disorders including dyspepsia, diarrhea and abdominal discomfort (n=3 [50.0%], Grade 1) and headache (n=2 [33.3%], Grade 1). One VOC occurred without hospital admission and did not require dose reduction or discontinuation. Table 1 summarizes the anti-sickling effect as well as the hematological and biochemical response to mitapivat treatment. Sickling occurred at lower pO2 levels in all 6 patients during the Dose Finding Period reflected by a significant decrease in treatment week 8 mean PoS compared to baseline. 5/6 subjects (83.3%) achieved a Hb increase of ≥1 g/dL during this period, which was accompanied by a decrease in hemolytic markers. Consistent with activation of PKR, 2,3-DPG levels decreased and ATP levels increased. Additional results including biomarker data will be presented. Conclusion Mitapivat demonstrated an adequate safety profile during the 8-week Dose Finding Period in patients with SCD. The data show promising efficacy in terms of a decrease in the pO2 at which RBCs start to sickle, as well as increase in Hb from baseline and a concomitant decrease in markers reflecting hemolysis. The observed changes in 2,3-DPG and ATP levels are consistent with the proposed mechanism of the drug. The study is ongoing and further data including follow-up data, patient-reported outcomes, PKR activity and thermostability will be reported at a later stage. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures van Dijk: Agios Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Axcella Health: Research Funding. Rab: Axcella Health: Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Rijneveld: Servier: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Nur: Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau. Schutgens: CSL Behring: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; OctaPharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Shire/Takeda: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Wijk: Agios Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Axcella health: Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Van Beers: Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; RR Mechatronics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

An Adaptive, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Study of Oral FT-4202, a Pyruvate Kinase Activator in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease (PRAISE)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-134266 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 19-20

Author(s):

Kenneth W. Wood ◽

James Geib ◽

Eric Wu ◽

Jason Berlin ◽

Irena Webster ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Sickle Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Oxygen Affinity ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Double Blind ◽

Secondary Endpoints ◽

2,3 Dpg

The hallmark of sickle cell disease (SCD) is hemoglobin S (HbS) polymerization upon deoxygenation, resulting in red blood cell (RBC) sickling, oxidative damage, membrane damage, hemolysis, chronic anemia, cell adhesion, vaso-occlusion and inflammation. Exacerbating the pathogenesis of SCD, the HbS RBC has increased (↑) levels of 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG), resulting in reduced (↓) Hb oxygen affinity (↑ P50), and ↓ ATP, essential for RBC homeostasis. FT-4202 is a potent, selective, and orally bioavailable allosteric activator of erythrocyte pyruvate kinase (PKR) that increases PKR activity, resulting in ↓ 2,3-DPG levels and ↑ ATP levels in RBCs. Preliminary data from the ongoing phase 1 study [NCT03815695] in healthy volunteers and patients with SCD indicate that FT-4202 is well tolerated, has no effect on steroidogenesis, and exhibits linear and time-independent pharmacokinetics (PK) and associated pharmacodynamic (PD) responses (↓ 2,3-DPG and ↑ ATP). Furthermore, in patients with SCD, a single dose of FT-4202 demonstrated favorable biologic effects, including increased Hb oxygen affinity (↓ P50), decreased point of sickling (PoS), improved RBC deformability, and improved RBC membrane function, indicative of overall improved RBC health (Estepp, J. EP1531; EHA 2020). Accordingly, we designed a phase 2/3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled global study (PRAISE) to investigate the safety and efficacy of FT-4202 in patients with SCD. The PRAISE study will enroll up to 344 adult and adolescent patients with SCD, including 60 to 90 patients in the Dose Determination (DD) Group and ~ 274 patients in the Efficacy Continuation (EC) Group (see Figure). Key inclusion criteria: SCD (all genotypes), at least 2 vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) in the past 12 mos, baseline Hb ≥ 5.5 and ≤ 10 g/dL, stable hydroxyurea (HU) therapy for the previous 90 days (if applicable). Key exclusion criteria: More than 10 VOCs in the past 12 mos, hospitalization for sickle cell crisis or other vaso-occlusive event within 14 days of consent, routine RBC transfusions, significant hepatic or renal dysfunction, history of unstable or deteriorating cardiac or pulmonary disease, or overt stroke within 2 yrs. Endpoints: The co-primary endpoints are (1) Hb response rate at Week 24 (increase of > 1 g/dL from baseline) and (2) annualized VOC rate during the blinded treatment period based on adjudicated VOC review. Secondary endpoints include measures of hemolysis, time to first VOC, and the PROMIS fatigue scale. Safety endpoints include the incidence of AEs, concomitant medications, vital signs, ECGs, clinical laboratory measurements, and physical examination. Design: The study design is a group-sequential, adaptive, phase 2/3 study (see Figure). Patients will be stratified by age, number of VOCs (2-3 vs. 4-10) in the preceding 12 mos, and prior/concomitant HU use in the preceding 12 mos. The phase 2 DD portion will assess 2 active doses and placebo with patients randomized 1:1:1. The dose will be chosen at the first interim analysis (IA1) based on safety and Hb response rate at Week 12 of the first 60 DD patients. A futility analysis will also be conducted on Hb response at that point. After dose selection, patients will be randomized 1:1 into the phase 3 EC portion to assess FT-4202 efficacy. Once 110 patients from phase 2 or 3 who have been randomized to the selected dose or placebo have completed 24 weeks of follow-up or have dropped out, a second interim analysis (IA2) will be performed to assess both efficacy and futility. IA2 will assess the co-primary endpoint of Hb response rate at Week 24 (p<0.001). The final analysis after 52 weeks of blinded treatment will test the VOC endpoint, the Hb response rate, and all secondary endpoints. Key secondary endpoints will be tested at IA2 and all will be tested at the final analysis, when there will be adequate power. Treatment: Patients will be randomized to receive FT-4202 or placebo. In the DD phase, two doses will be evaluated, and in the EC phase, the selected dose of FT-4202 from the DD phase will be evaluated in comparison to placebo. Patients in DD on the unselected dose will remain on treatment at that dose level for 52 weeks. Following completion of 52 weeks of double-blind treatment, patients may enter a 52-week open-label extension period to receive FT-4202 at the selected dose. Status: Study initiation is planned for late 2020; status will be updated at presentation. Figure Disclosures Wood: Forma Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Geib:Forma Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Wu:Forma Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Berlin:Forma Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Webster:Forma Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Ataga:Shire/Takeda: Research Funding; Editas Medicine: Honoraria; Global Blood Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Modus Therapeutics: Honoraria; Bioverativ: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Research Funding. Howard:Agios, Forma Therapeutics, Inc., Global Blood Therapeutics, Imara, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Imara, Inc., Novartis, Resonance Health: Honoraria. Estepp:ASH, NHLBI: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo, Esperion, Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy; Global Blood Therapeutics, Forma Therapeutics, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Co: Research Funding. Telen:Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlycoMimetics Inc.: Consultancy; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding. Brevard:Forma Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment.

Download Full-text

PTG-300 Eliminates the Need for Therapeutic Phlebotomy in Both Low and High-Risk Polycythemia Vera Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-137285 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 33-35 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Marina Kremyanskaya ◽

Yelena Ginzburg ◽

Andrew T. Kuykendall ◽

Abdulraheem Yacoub ◽

Jay Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Iron Deficiency ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Dose Finding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Trial

Background. Polycythemia vera (PV) patients are treated with periodic therapeutic phlebotomy (TP) in order to maintain hematocrit levels <45% in an effort to reduce the incidence of thrombotic events [Marchioli NEJM 2013]. Since, they are seen periodically, PV patients likely spend significant time with hematocrit levels >45%, thereby potentially increasing their risk of thrombosis. Symptomatic iron deficiency represents a challenge in PV as it is commonly present at diagnosis [Ginzburg Leukemia 2018] and worsens after repeated and/or frequent TP, and often symptomatic from their iron deficiency. We hypothesized that both iron deficiency and expanded erythropoiesis in PV lead to suppression of hepcidin, the body's main negative regulator of iron metabolism, and that hepcidin suppression enhances iron absorption and availability for enhanced erythropoiesis in TP-requiring PV patients. We previously demonstrated that PTG-300, a hepcidin-mimetic, caused dose-related anemia in preclinical studies. In a phase 2 trial in β-thalassemia, PTG-300 leads to a sustained (3-7 days) decrease in serum iron and transferrin saturation (TSAT) but did not demonstrate off-target effects. The current study aims to compare the iron status and phlebotomy requirements in high TP-requiring PV patients before and during treatment with PTG-300 (Figure 1). Methods. PTG-300-04 is a 3-part Phase 2 trial consisting of (1) a 28-week dose-finding; (2) a 12-week blinded randomized withdrawal (1:1) PTG-300 vs placebo; and (3) a 52-week open label extension (Figure 1). Eligibility criteria include PV diagnosis (by 2016 WHO criteria) and ≥3 phlebotomies with or without concurrent cytoreductive therapy to maintain hematocrit ≤45% in the 24 weeks prior to enrollment. PTG-300 doses of 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80 mg administered subcutaneously weekly were adjusted to maintain hematocrit <45%. Results. Thirteen subjects were enrolled to date: 7/13 with low risk, mean age 57.4 years (range 31-74). Six receiving TP alone, 6 concurrent hydroxyurea, 1 on concurrent interferon; TP in the 24 weeks prior to enrollment = 3-9; median time between TP = 42 days. After instruction, each of the patients self-administered the drug at home. Eight subjects have been treated for ≥3 months with PTG-300 (Figure 2a). Three subjects have been randomized. During the open label dose finding portion of the study, all subjects were phlebotomy-free with the exception of one subject. Three subjects completed part 1 (28 weeks) with no TP as compared to 3-5 TP required in a similar period prior to study initiation. During the 28-week dose-finding period, the hematocrit was continuously controlled below 45% in all but two subjects' (Figure 2b). Two subjects had hematocrits transiently >45% but remained below 45% after phlebotomy in one and dose increase in both. Furthermore, erythrocyte numbers decreased (Figure 2c) and MCV increased in all but two subjects. These findings suggest a redistribution of iron within erythropoiesis. Lastly, prior to treatment, mean iron-related parameters were consistent with systemic iron deficiency while serum ferritin increased progressively toward normal range. Most frequent adverse events were injection site reaction (ISR) reported by three patients. Most of the reactions were grade 1-2 and were transient in nature and no patient discontinued the drug. Conclusions. The current results indicate that PTG-300 is an effective agent for the treatment of PV, reversing iron deficiency and eliminating the need for TP in PV patients. Elimination of TP requirements for 7 months in TP-dependent PV patients is significant and unexpected. The effect of PTG-300 on PV-related symptoms is also being evaluated. Continued patient enrollment will enable more definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy and safety of hepcidin mimetic PTG-300 in PV patients with high TP requirements. PTG-300 looks very promising in eliminating the therapeutic phlebotomies in both low and high-risk patients. Disclosures Kremyanskaya: Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Protagonist Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Kuykendall:Blueprint Medicines: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Yacoub:Roche: Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Hylapharm: Current equity holder in private company; Cara Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Ardelyx: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Agios: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Dynavax: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Yang:AROG: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding; Protagonist: Research Funding. Gupta:Protagonist: Current Employment. Valone:Protagonist: Current Employment. Khanna:Protagonist: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Verstovsek:PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI Biopharma Corp: Research Funding; Protagonist Therapeutics: Research Funding; ItalPharma: Research Funding. Hoffman:Forbius: Consultancy; Dompe: Research Funding; Protagonist: Consultancy; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Carfilzomib Thalidomide and Dexamethasone Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Open Label Phase II Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) MM 018/ Asian Myeloma Network (AMN) 002 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139174 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 39-40

Author(s):

Hang Quach ◽

Simon J Harrison ◽

Je-Jung Lee ◽

Nichloas Murphy ◽

Jae Hoon Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Primary Endpoint ◽

Research Funding ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Open Label Phase ◽

Grade 3

Background: The combination of carfilzomib with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and dexamethasone is active in multiple myeloma (MM). Carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (KTd) has been studied in upfront MM treatment but has not been studied in the setting of relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM). The ALLG MM018/ AMN002 is an open-label phase II study of KTd in patients with RRMM. This study was conducted across 16 sites across Australia, New-Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Method: Patients with RRMM with 1-3 prior lines of treatment were given carfilzomib [K: 20mg/m2 IV cycle 1 days 1 and 2, 56mg/m2 (36mg/m2 for patients age ≥75 years) from cycle 1 day 8 onwards], thalidomide (T: 100mg po nocte) and dexamethasone [dex: 40mg (20mg for patients age ≥75 years) po weekly], in a 28-day cycle. After 12 cycles, T was omitted, and K was given on days 1,2,15,16 and dex days 1,15 every 28-day cycles for a further six cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were ORR, overall survival, adverse events, and quality of life (QoL). The study had an 80% power to detect a ≥70% PFS at 6.5 months compared to historical ≤50% PFS at 6.5 months expected with Td (Kropff, M. et al. Haematologica 2012), at a significance level of 0.05. Results: This study has completed accrual. Eighty-three patients [median age of 66 years (42-85)] were enrolled with a median follow up of 15.9 (0.9-26) months. ORR rates were 86.4% (≥VGPR 70.2%). Median PFS was 20m (95% CI 15.9-26m). PFS at 6.5 months was 76.2% (95% CI 73.6-84.9%). Median OS has not been reached, and was 75% at 20 months. The most common grade ≥3/4 AEs were peripheral neuropathy (16%), upper respiratory tract infections (12%), dyspnoea (14%), and hypertension (10%). Grade ≥3/4 cardiac AEs occurred in 6%. The median carfilzomib dose that was delivered was 70.7% (32.8-92.6%) of the target dose. Thus far, 41% of patients have completed the intended 18 cycles of treatment. 21% of patients ceased therapy early. The most common reason for early treatment cessation was disease progression (30%) and adverse events (15%). Fifteen patients (18%) have died, 11 were due to MM, two from infection, one from an ischaemic cardiac event, and one from a traffic accident. QoL, as measured by the EQ-5D-5L instrument, remained stable throughout treatment. Conclusion: The ALLG MM018/AMN 002 study has met its primary endpoint. The KTd schedule as outlined in this study is efficacious in patients with RRMM, resulting in a prolonged PFS and a safety profile in line with previous reports for each of carfilzomib and thalidomide. KTd is an active option in jurisdictions where the cost of other IMiDs prohibits regulatory funding. Comparisons of efficacy and adverse events between the Caucasian and Asian populations will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Quach: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Glaxo Kline Smith: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding. Harrison:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: wrt panobinostat; Haemalogix: Consultancy. Augustson:Roche: Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support. Campbell:Amgen, Novartis, Roche, Janssen, Celgene (BMS): Research Funding; AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, Amgen, CSL Behring, Novartis: Consultancy. Soo:Hanmi: Research Funding. Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Final Results From a Pivotal, Multicenter, International, Open-Label, Phase 2 Study of Romidepsin In Progressive or Relapsed Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) Following Prior Systemic Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.114.114 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 114-114 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Bertrand Coiffier ◽

Barbara Pro ◽

H. Miles Prince ◽

Francine M Foss ◽

Lubomir Sokol ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Systemic Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

T Cell Lymphoma ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Prior Systemic Therapy

Abstract Abstract 114 Background: Romidepsin is a potent HDAC inhibitor approved by the FDA for patients (pts) with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who have received at least 1 prior systemic therapy. Durable clinical benefit and tolerability of romidepsin in pts with recurrent or refractory PTCL have been previously observed in a phase 2 trial conducted by the National Cancer Institute. The aim of this phase 2, single-arm, open-label registration study was to evaluate the activity of romidepsin in a larger number of pts with progressive or relapsed PTCL. Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed PTCL (PTCL NOS, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, ALCL [ALK-1 negative], other subtypes) who failed or were refractory to ≥ 1 prior systemic therapy, and had measurable disease and ECOG performance status 0–2 were eligible. Exclusions included inadequate bone marrow or other organ function and significant cardiovascular abnormalities. Pts received romidepsin 14 mg/m2 as a 4-h IV infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for up to 6 cycles; treatment could be extended for stable disease (SD) or response. The primary endpoint was rate of complete response (CR + CRu) as evaluated by a central Independent Review Committee (IRC) using International Working Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. IRC assessment consisted of a 2-step process, with initial radiographic review of images (CT, MRI) followed by an overall clinical assessment based on the radiology evaluations, photographs, and relevant clinical parameters. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR): CR + CRu + partial response (PR), investigator-assessed responses, duration of response, time to response, and safety. Results: 131 pts from 48 US, European, and Australian sites were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of romidepsin (as-treated population); 130 patients had histologically confirmed PTCL by central review. Mean age of all pts was 59.4 y (range, 20–83) and median time since diagnosis was 1.25 y (range, 0–17). Median number of prior systemic therapies was 2 (range, 1–8). 21 pts (16%) had failed a prior stem cell transplant. Responses assessed by the IRC are noted in the table below. Longest duration of response is 26+ mo and 16 (94%) of the 17 pts with a CR had not progressed as of the data cutoff (March 31, 2010). Investigator-assessed responses included 21 pts (16%) with CR + CRu, 18 pts (14%) with PR for an ORR of 30%. Currently, 13 pts continue to receive treatment (range, 10–36 cycles). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 126 of 131 pts (96%). AEs reported in ≥ 20% of pts were nausea (59%), fatigue (41%), vomiting (38%), thrombocytopenia (38%), diarrhea (35%), pyrexia (34%), neutropenia (30%), anorexia (28%), constipation (28%), anemia (23%), and dysgeusia (21%). AEs ≥ grade 3 were reported for 86 pts (66%), with the most common (≥ 5%) being pneumonia (5%), pyrexia (5%), sepsis (5%), and vomiting (5%). 60 pts (46%) had at least 1 serious AE: the most frequently reported (≥ 5%) were pyrexia (7%), pneumonia (5%), vomiting (5%), and sepsis (5%). 22 pts (17%) withdrew due to AEs. 8 pts (6%) died within 30 days of the last dose of romidepsin; 1 death, due to sepsis, was assessed as possibly related to treatment. Conclusions: Complete and durable responses were observed with single agent romidepsin in pts with relapsed PTCL. These data support the therapeutic potential for romidepsin in relapsed PTCL and suggest that romidepsin is a strong candidate for inclusion in future novel regimens for these diseases. As of the data cutoff (March 31, 2010), the median duration of follow-up for CR is 8.2 mo. Disclosures: Coiffier: Gloucester: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Romidepsin is indicated for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in patients who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. Romidepsin is not currently approved for the treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Pro:Celgene: Research Funding. Prince:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Foss:Celgene: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Speakers Bureau; Allos: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Cephalon: Speakers Bureau. Sokol:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Caballero:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Morschhauser:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria. Padmanabhan:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Shustov:Celgene: Research Funding. Nichols:Celgene: Employment. Carroll:Celgene: Employment. Balser:Gloucester Pharmaceutical: Consultancy. Horwitz:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Iadademstat in Combination with Azacitidine Generates Robust and Long Lasting Responses in AML Patients (ALICE Trial)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152183 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3376-3376

Author(s):

Olga Salamero ◽

Tim C.P Somervaille ◽

Antonieta Molero ◽

Evelyn Acuña-Cruz ◽

Jose Pérez-Simón ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Objective Response ◽

Therapeutic Options ◽

Dose Finding ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Platelet Recovery

Abstract Introduction: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematological malignancy. Elderly patients were historically treated with chemotherapy, with ORRs below 30%. Despite treatment improvements with the recent approval of the combination venetoclax plus azacitidine, with 64% of ORR and overall survival of 14.7 months, 25% of patients continue to be refractory and 50% are estimated to relapse. The management of AML, especially in elderly or unfit patients, remains a major challenge. Lysine-specific histone demethylase 1 (LSD1) contributes to the malignant transformation event in AML. Iadademstat (iada) selectively inhibits LSD1 and has shown efficacy in preclinical models, including promoting differentiation in AML. Iada has been administered so far to +100 oncology patients in different clinical trials, showing good safety. With a favorable ADME profile and high bioactivity allowing low dosing regimens, a low DDI risk is anticipated, making iada suitable for different drug combinations and offering additional therapeutic options for patients. This is a 36-month update of the ongoing Phase II ALICE clinical trial of iadademstat plus azacitidine in front-line AML patients. Methods: ALICE (EudraCT 2018-000482-36) is an open-label, single arm, Phase IIa clinical trial to assess the safety, tolerability, dose finding and efficacy of iadademstat in combination with azacitidine for the treatment of adult AML patients. ALICE includes AML patients, who have not received prior treatment other than hydroxyurea and are considered by the investigator as ineligible for intensive chemotherapy or have refused this treatment option. Secondary end points of the study address the anti-leukemic activity of the combination (overall response rate, time to response and duration of response) along with PK/PD measures. Results: Current unaudited data corresponds to 34 patients enrolled, including 22 evaluable patients (with at least 1 bone marrow disease evaluation). Evaluable patients achieved an 73% objective response rate (ORR): 5 complete remissions (CR), 6 CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi) and 5 Partial Remissions (PR). The current median Time to Response is 30 days, with some durable responses, extending for more than one year in five patients, with the longest CR up to date above 930 days (still ongoing, with CR and MRD negative). Moreover, 5 patients became transfusion independent and MRD negative. The number of adverse events (AEs) reported is in line with the usual evolution of the disease and with other AML trials. Only 2 AEs (in 2 patients) were deemed as serious reactions, probably related to treatment: one differentiation syndrome (G3) and one intracranial hemorrhage (G5). The most frequent reported adverse reaction was thrombocytopenia, observed in almost half of patients (47%), although 63% of patients had presented with grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia at baseline, making difficult to unequivocally attribute observed cytopenias to treatment. Of note, patients that showed response experienced platelet recovery within the first 3 cycles of treatment. Other than the hematological events, the iada-azacitidine combination appears to be safe and well tolerated. We have not observed other significant non-hematological toxicities or other organ-related toxicities. We expect to achieve full patient recruitment of the ALICE study (36 subjects) in October 2021 and will report updated safety and efficacy results based on an October data cut-off. Conclusions: Data to date indicate that iadademstat has a good safety profile and produces robust, fast and in some cases durable responses. Iadademstat appears to be an active candidate for combination with azacitidine and other agents. Drug-related toxicity appears to be predictable, manageable, and restricted to hematologic events. Considering the novel mechanism of action of iadademstat, a pro-differentiating agent, combination strategies with iadademstat might increase therapeutic options for AML patients in first line treatment, as well as for refractory, intolerant, or relapsed patients. Disclosures Salamero: Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Somervaille: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Molero: AbbVie: Honoraria; Jansen: Honoraria; BMS-Celgene: Other: Travel, accommodation expenses. Pérez-Simón: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gutierrez: Oryzon Genomics: Current Employment. Buesa: Oryzon Genomics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Bosch: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel; TAKEDA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel. Montesinos: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Tolero Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Stemline/Menarini: Consultancy; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Interim Results from Fight-203, a Phase 2, Open-Label, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Pemigatinib (INCB054828) in Patients with Myeloid/Lymphoid Neoplasms with Rearrangement of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 (FGFR1)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-110388 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 690-690 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Srdan Verstovsek ◽

Alessandro M. Vannucchi ◽

Alessandro Rambaldi ◽

Jason R. Gotlib ◽

Adam J. Mead ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phosphate Binders ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Open Label ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Lymphoid Neoplasms ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms (MLNs) with rearrangement of FGFR1 on chromosome band 8p11 are rare but aggressive neoplasms characterized by heterogeneous presentation with myeloid and/or lymphoid proliferation, extramedullary involvement, and rapid progression to blast phase (Strati P, et al., Leuk Lymphoma. 2018;59:1672-1676). FGFR1 gets constitutively activated through fusion genes involving various partner genes, most frequently ZMYM2-FGFR1 or BCR-FGFR1 as consequence of a t(8;13)(p11;q12) or a t(8;22)(p11;q11), respectively. Chemotherapy is usually ineffective, effective targeted treatment has not been described, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) is the only potentially curative option. Pemigatinib, a selective, potent, oral inhibitor of FGFR1, 2, and 3, has shown efficacy in patients with FGF/FGFR-activated tumors, including cholangiocarcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. We report interim results from the ongoing fight-203 study (NCT03011372) of pemigatinib in patients with FGFR1-rearranged MLNs. Methods: Fight-203 is a phase 2, open-label study enrolling patients ≥ 18 years of age with FGFR1-rearranged MLN. Patients enrolled in the study must have progressed on ≥ 1 prior treatment and be ineligible for alloHSCT. Patients receive a daily oral dose of pemigatinib 13.5 mg on a 21-day cycle (2 weeks on, 1 week off) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is overall clinical benefit rate, which includes complete clinical (CR) or partial clinical response (PR), and either complete or partial cytogenetic response (CCyR, PCyR). Secondary endpoints include duration of response/benefit, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety/tolerability. Efficacy is assessed by evaluation of bone marrow histomorphology changes, standard cytogenetic and FISH evaluation of the FGFR1 rearrangement, and PET/CT scan. Results: At data cutoff (July 23, 2018), 14 patients were enrolled. Ten patients who had ≥ 1 response assessment were included in the analysis (Table). Patients received an average of 6.9 cycles of pemigatinib (range, 2-12 cycles). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range, 0-5), including 2 patients who received alloHSCT. Eight patients (80%) had a major CyR, including 6 patients with CCyR and 2 with PCyR. Eight patients (80%) had a CR or PR in bone marrow, peripheral blood, and extramedullary disease. One patient died of progression to myeloid blast crisis, 2 patients were bridged to alloHSCT, and 7 patients are ongoing. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were hyperphosphatemia (n=7 [70%]), diarrhea (n=5 [50%]) and anemia (n=5 [50%]); hyperphosphatemia was managed with diet and phosphate binders. Nine events in 4 patients (40%) were grade 3/4; 2 of these events (diarrhea and leukopenia) in 2 patients were related to pemigatinib. There were no drug-related AEs leading to dose interruption, dose reduction, or discontinuation. Conclusions: Pemigatinib showed promising efficacy, with an 80% major CyR rate accompanied by complete or partial remission, and was generally well tolerated by patients with FGFR1-rearranged MLN. The protocol was amended to allow continuous dosing, and the study is currently enrolling. Disclosures Verstovsek: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gotlib:Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Deciphera: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Kartos: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Mead:Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Evotek: Research Funding; ARIAD: Consultancy; Cell Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Elstar: Research Funding. Hochhaus:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kiladjian:AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hernandez Boluda:Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Asatiani:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lihou:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhen:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Reiter:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Use of Open-Label Romiplostim in Children with Chronic/Refractory Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.621.621 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 621-621

Author(s):

James B Bussel ◽

George R. Buchanan ◽

David J. Gnarra ◽

Richard H. Ho ◽

Kun Nie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Pediatric Patients ◽

Extension Study ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Bone Marrow Biopsies ◽

Platelet Counts ◽

Open Label Extension

Abstract Abstract 621 Background: Treatment options for children with chronic/refractory ITP are not well characterized. In a phase 1/2 16-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of 22 patients (romiplostim n = 17, placebo n = 5), the thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist romiplostim was well tolerated and 15 of 17 romiplostim-treated patients achieved platelet counts ≥50×109/L (Bussel et al, Blood 2011). Twenty-one of 22 patients from this phase 1/2 study subsequently entered an open-label extension study; 1/21 patients discontinued the extension study before receiving romiplostim. For the 20 patients who received romiplostim in the first extension study, the mean duration of treatment was 1.6 years (range, 0.1 to 2.1 years); all 20 achieved platelet counts >50×109/L (Nugent et al, 2011 ASPHO abstracts). Of the 17 patients who completed this extension study, 12 rolled over into a second open-label extension study for up to 2.5 years of further romiplostim treatment. Results from those 12 patients are described here. Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of long-term use of romiplostim in pediatric ITP. Methods: During the second extension study, patients received weekly subcutaneous injections of romiplostim with the initial dose being the same as the last dose in the prior study. Dose adjustment was allowed to maintain platelet counts in the target range of 50–200×109/L. The maximum allowed romiplostim dose was 10 μg/kg. The primary endpoint of this study was incidence of adverse events; platelet response was a secondary endpoint. The protocol did not require bone marrow biopsies to be conducted at pre-defined intervals, but any bone marrow biopsies performed as clinically indicated were to be analyzed. As deemed appropriate by investigators, patients or their caregivers had the option to administer romiplostim at home during this study; those patients who administered romiplostim at home used diary cards to record dosing date, time, volume administered, and any dosing errors. Patients who turned 18 years of age during this study were permitted to remain on study. Results: Baseline demographics for this second extension study included a median age of 12 years (range 3, 16 years), 67% male, and 33% with a prior splenectomy. Median romiplostim treatment duration in this second extension study was 118.9 weeks (range 100.1, 125.9 weeks); median average weekly romiplostim dose was 5.2 μg/kg (range 1, 10 μg/kg). Of the 3 patients who discontinued the study, 2 withdrew consent and 1 was noncompliant; no patients withdrew due to safety issues and 9 continued on study. Median platelet counts for all 12 patients were above 50×109/L throughout, and were in the target range of 50–200×109/L for all visits but Weeks 3 and 76 (Figure). Interestingly, the median dose decreased over time from a median (Q1, Q3) of 8.0 (5.5, 9.0) μg/kg at Week 1 to 1.0 (0.0, 6.0) μg/kg at Week 116 (last timepoint for which data are available) (Figure). Two patients received rescue medications (defined as medications used for platelet counts <10×109/L, bleeding/wet purpura, or investigator decision); one patient received platelet transfusions and another prednisone. Four patients (33.3%) had serious adverse events (asthma, epistaxis, hemangioma, hypotension, pyrexia, thrombocytopenia, and transfusion reaction) and one had a life-threatening adverse event (thrombocytopenia). None of the adverse events were deemed treatment-related by the investigators. There were no fatal adverse events. Eight patients had bleeding adverse events; one of which (gingival bleeding) was deemed treatment-related. These bleeding adverse events included epistaxis (4 patients), petechiae (3 patients), gingival bleeding (2 patients), and (in 1 patient each) bleeding from the anus, injection site, lip, and mouth; 1 patient also had unspecified bleeding. No bone marrow biopsies were reported to have been performed. Conclusion: In this open-label extension study, romiplostim increased platelet counts in pediatric patients with chronic ITP without significant toxicity. Thus, romiplostim has been well tolerated and shown to be of clinical benefit to pediatric patients with refractory severe chronic ITP. As this study is ongoing, future results will provide additional data regarding even longer-term use of TPO receptor agonists in this patient population. Disclosures: Bussel: Cangene: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Family owns GSK stock, Family owns GSK stock Other, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; IgG of America: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Ligand: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sysmex: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Amgen: Family owns Amgen stock Other, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: The use of romiplostim in pediatric patients was examined in this study. Nie:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Eisen:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Phase 1b Results of a Phase 1b/2 Study of Obinutuzmab, Ibrutinib, and Venetoclax in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.639.639 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 639-639 ◽

Cited By ~ 21

Author(s):

Jeffrey A. Jones ◽

Jennifer Woyach ◽

Farrukh T. Awan ◽

Kami J. Maddocks ◽

Thomas Whitlow ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Objective Response ◽

Response Assessment ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Once Daily ◽

Phase 1B

Abstract BACKGROUND Venetoclax(VEN), a once daily oral inhibitor of BCL2, has demonstrated high response rates and acceptable toxicity in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CLL both as a single agent and in combination with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies rituximab and obinutuzumab (formerly GA-101, G), where minimal residual disease (MRD) negative responses have been observed in the majority of patients. Ibrutinib (IBR), a once daily oral inhibitor of the Brutontyrosine kinase, likewise induces remissions in the majority of treated patients, but complete response (CR) is uncommon even after prolonged administration. Early genetic studies have demonstrated that BCL2 over-expression rescues BTK deficient XID murine B-cells from spontaneous apoptosis (J Immunol 1996), so we hypothesized that combination therapy would more efficiently achieve deep response endpoints. We report phase 1b results of a single-institution phase 1b/2 study of G, IBR, and VEN to characterize the safety and preliminary efficacy of the combination. METHODS Patients with CLL relapsed after or refractory to ≥1 prior therapy and who required treatment were eligible. Enrolled patients had ECOG ≤1 and preserved end-organ function, including creatinine clearance ≥50 mL/min/m2. Patients with chronic viral hepatitis infection, uncontrolled autoimmunecytopenia, active Richter transformation, and known cysteine-481 BTK mutation or clinical disease progression during treatment with a cysteine-481-binding BTK inhibitor were excluded. G, IBR, and VEN were started sequentially over the first 3 of fourteen 28-day cycles as detailed in the table. To establish the safety of VEN in combination with OBIN and IBR, VEN dose was escalated in 3 x 3 cohorts (100, 200, 400 mg) to a maximum planned dose of 400 mg daily. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined during the third cycle. Risk assessment for VEN dose ramp-up was conducted according to US prescribing information. Adverse events were assessed and graded using CTCAE v4.03. Response assessment according to IWCLL 2008 criteria, including bone marrow biopsy with 4-colorimmunophenotyping of marrow and peripheral blood (PB) for MRD, occurs after cycles 8 and 14. RESULTS Twelve R/R patients have been treated in the phase 1b portion of the trial. Median age was 57 years (range: 42-70) and median prior therapies was 1 (range: 1-7). Baseline genetic risk features includedunmutatedIGHV in 11 (92%),del(17p) in 1 (8%), del(11q) in 8 (67%), and complex abnormal karyotype in 5 (42%) patients. Tumor lysis (TLS) risk was low in 1 (8%), medium in 7 (58%), and high in 4 (33%) patients at study entry. In general, observed toxicities for the combination were consistent with those reported for the single agents. DLTs were not observed at any VEN dose level, establishing VEN 400 mg daily as safe in combination with standard doses of G and IBR. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events (regardless of attribution) were neutropenia (50%), lymphopenia (33%),hypertension(25%), and fatigue (17%). Grade 1/2 adverse events occurring in over half the patients included bruising (all grade 1, 83%), infusion related reaction (75%), hypertension (67%), headache (67%), hyperuricemia (all grade 1, 75%), hypocalcemia (75%), and diarrhea (all grade 1, 67%), AST and/or ALT elevation (58%), and rash (50%). No cases of either clinical or laboratory TLS were observed. All patients remain on therapy and 6 have reached response assessment after completing 8 cycles of therapy. All 6 have achieved objective response: 5 PR, including 1 MRD-negative in PB (VEN 100) and 1 MRD-negative in both PB and marrow (VEN 100), and 1 CR with MRD-negative PB and marrow (VEN 200). CONCLUSIONS G, IBR, and VEN can be safely administered in combination at doses standard for the treatment of CLL. DLTs were not observed, establishing VEN 400 mg as the recommended phase 2 dose in combination with G and IBR. Adverse events were manageable and largely consistent with those reported in the single agent phase 2 studies. Objective responses, including MRD-negative responses, have been observed among all R/R patients from the first dose cohorts. Accrual continues to parallel phase 2 cohorts of R/R (n=25) and TN (n=25) patients. Updated phase 1b toxicity and response data will be presented. Table. Table. Disclosures Jones: Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Awan:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis Oncology: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Pharmacodynamic Effects of AG-946, a Highly Potent Next-Generation Activator of Pyruvate Kinase, in Ex Vivo Treatment of Red Blood Cells from Sickle Cell Disease Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-145374 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2029-2029

Author(s):

Minke A.E. Rab ◽

Myrthe J. Van Dijk ◽

Jennifer Bos ◽

Brigitte A. van Oirschot ◽

Johan Gerrits ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Health Research ◽

Stock Options ◽

Research Funding ◽

Ex Vivo ◽

Next Generation ◽

Cell Disease ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Glycolytic Intermediates ◽

2,3 Dpg

Abstract Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a monogenetic red blood disorder that is characterized by hemolytic anemia and vaso-occlusive crises. Among the many factors that contribute to disease pathophysiology is stiffening and sickling of red blood cells (RBC), which is the direct result of the formation of abnormal hemoglobin S. Sickling is one of the core factors that cause vaso-occlusion and sickling is modulated by glycolytic intermediates such as 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG) and ATP. Previously we showed that red blood cell pyruvate kinase (PKR), the key regulatory enzyme of glycolysis, is impaired in SCD and that ex vivo treatment with mitapivat, an allosteric activator of PKR, increased enzymatic activity and thermostability, reduced 2,3-DPG levels, decreased p50, and subsequently reduced sickling (Rab et al, Blood 2021). Currently, mitapivat is in phase 1 and phase 2 trials for SCD (#NCT04000165 and EudraCT#2019-003438). Aims: Recently, AG-946, a next-generation activator of PKR has been developed. Here we investigate the pharmacodynamic effects of AG-946 in ex vivo treatment of RBC from SCD patients in comparison with mitapivat. Methods: Buffy coat depleted whole blood obtained from five patients with SCD was incubated for 20-24 hrs in absence or presence of mitapivat (100 mM) or AG-946 (1 mM, 5 mM, 50 mM). After ex vivo treatment, enzymatic activities of PKR and PK-thermostability was measured. Glycolytic intermediates ATP and 2,3-DPG were measured using LC-MS/MS. Hemoglobin oxygen affinity (p50) was measured with the Hemox Analyzer. RBC sickling was analyzed with the oxygenscan, a newly developed method that characterizes individual sickling behavior by oxygen gradient ektacytometry. Individual tendency to sickle is reflected by Point-of-Sickling (PoS) that indicates the specific pO 2 at which RBCs start to sickle during deoxygenation under shear stress. Results: PKR activity was increased compared to vehicle (DMSO) to a similar extent in presence of both mitapivat and AG-946 (Figure 1A). In addition, PKR thermostability was significantly increased compared to vehicle (mean 22%, SD 6%) in samples treated with mitapivat 100 mM (mean 78%, SD 11%), as well as AG-946 5 mM (mean 66%, SD 23%), and AG-946 50 mM (mean 95%, SD 17%, Figure 1B). The glycolytic intermediate 2,3-DPG decreased after incubation with both mitapivat and AG-946 (Figure 1C), which was further illustrated by the improved ATP/2,3-DPG ratio (Figure 1D). In line with these latter results p50 decreased significantly after incubation with mitapivat 100 mM (mean 95%, SD 2%), as well as AG-946 1 mM (mean 96%, SD 2%), AG-946 5 mM (mean 94%, SD 2%), and AG-946 50 mM (mean 95%, SD 3%, Figure 1E). The improved metabolic status and p50 was accompanied by a decreased PoS compared to vehicle in RBCs treated with mitapivat or AG-946, indicating reduced RBC sickling tendency in vitro (Figure 1F). Conclusion: Ex vivo treatment of SCD RBCs with the next-generation PKR activator AG-946 activates and stabilizes PK, decreases 2,3-DPG levels, improves the ATP/2,3-DPG ratio, improves p50 and lowers the PoS. These beneficial effects are similar to ex vivo treatment with mitapivat but, importantly, are obtained at much lower concentrations. Therefore, AG-946 may be a potent activator of PKR in SCD. Taken together, these results are the first in an ex vivo model to demonstrate that the next-generation PK activator AG-946 has a similar favorable pharmacodynamic profile to mitapivat with enhanced PK-stabilizing properties and, hence, represents a potential novel therapeutic option in addition to mitapivat for the treatment of SCD and other hemolytic anemias. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Rab: Axcella Health: Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Van Dijk: Axcella Health: Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Kosinski: Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Kung: Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Van Beers: Pfizer: Research Funding; RR Mechatronics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Dang: Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Wijk: Agios Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Axcella health: Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase 2, Open-Label, Ascending Dose Study of Ker-050 for the Treatment of Anemia in Patients with Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147335 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3675-3675

Author(s):

David M Ross ◽

Alejandro Arbelaez ◽

Lynette C.Y. Chee ◽

Chun Yew Fong ◽

Devendra Hiwase ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Study Drug ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Maximum Increase ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Dose Levels

Abstract Background: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis leading to cytopenias, including anemia and thrombocytopenia. KER-050, a modified activin receptor type IIA inhibitor, is designed to target transforming growth factor-β ligands, including activin A. In preclinical studies, KER-050 promoted the maturation of progenitors across the full spectrum of erythropoiesis and thrombopoiesis and elicited bone anabolic effects. In a Phase 1 study in healthy participants, KER-050 treatment resulted in robust and sustained increases in reticulocytes (RETs), hemoglobin (HGB), and platelets. Increases in the bone formation marker bone specific alkaline phosphatase were also observed. Here we report results of an ongoing Phase 2 study to evaluate whether KER-050 provides therapeutic benefit in MDS patients with anemia. Aims: Evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of ascending doses of KER-050 in participants with MDS in an open-label, 2-part Phase 2 study. Methods: IPSS-R very low-to-intermediate risk MDS patients (both RS+ and non-RS) with anemia (HGB <10g/dL or requiring RBC transfusions) are enrolled. In Part 1, ascending dose cohorts receive KER-050 subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 4 doses starting at 0.75mg/kg until a recommended Part 2 dose is determined. Part 2 dose expansion will begin following Part 1, with treatment extended to 2 years. Safety endpoints include incidence of adverse events (AEs); erythroid efficacy endpoints (≥8 weeks duration) include rates of transfusion independence (TI) in transfused participants, reduction in RBC transfusions by ≥4 units or ≥50% reduction in high transfusion burden participants (HTB) and HGB increase ≥1.5g/dL in non-transfused (NT) and low transfusion burden (LTB) participants. Results are reported for efficacy-evaluable participants in cohorts 1 and 2 of Part 1 dose escalation, defined as having ≥8 weeks of HGB and transfusion data. Results: At data cut-off (July 10, 2021) with median follow-up of 140 days (range 1 to 169 days), 17 participants had received ≥1 dose of KER-050 across 3 dose levels: 0.75 mg/kg, 1.5 mg/kg and 2.5 mg/kg. Baseline characteristics are described in Table 1. No related serious AEs, dose-limiting toxicities, or dose modifications were reported. One participant developed grade 2 maculopapular rash after the first dose which was considered treatment related, resolved and did not recur with subsequent doses. No other related AEs were reported. Two discontinued study drug prior to end of treatment: 1 due to participant decision, 1 due to death unrelated to study drug. None developed high risk MDS or AML. In 10 efficacy-evaluable participants, overall erythroid response rate was 60% (n=6/10). 33% (n=1/3) NT participants had a HGB increase of ≥1.5g/dL sustained ≥ 8 weeks. 5 of 7 transfused participants (71%) (n=1/2 LTB and n=4/5 HTB; n=2/3 non-RS and n=3/4 RS+) had erythroid responses sustained ≥8 weeks (range 8-20 weeks, ongoing) and 57% (n=4/7) achieved TI (Figure 1, Panel A). Maximum increase from baseline in RETs observed in transfused responders (TR) (n=5) was 24.6 x10 9/L (mean), range 10.5- 41.6 x10 9/L from day 1-29 with increases in RETs seen after each dose (Panel B). Maximum reduction in serum ferritin in TR was 40.4% (mean), range 10-66%, and maximum increase in soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) was 52.8% (mean), range 29.8-116.4%. Increases in platelets were observed in TR (Panel C). Mean baseline platelet count for TR was 234 x10 9/L (range 104-401 x10 9/L), and maximum increase from baseline was 130 x10 9/L (mean), range 32-235 x10 9/L. No participants required dose reduction due to thrombocytosis. Summary: Erythroid responses have been observed in RS+ and non-RS MDS patients including reduction in transfusion burden at the initial dose levels. Observed increases in RETs and sTfR and observed decreases in ferritin suggest that KER-050 treatment is potentially associated with increased erythropoiesis. Increases in platelets have been observed in TR. These data support the potential of KER-050 as a treatment for multilineage cytopenias in MDS by potentially targeting multiple stages of hematopoiesis. As of data cut-off, KER-050 has been well tolerated. Dose escalation is ongoing in this Phase 2 study of anemic patients with MDS; data from planned cohorts from Part 1 will be presented. Part 2 dose expansion phase is expected to initiate prior to the meeting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ross: Bristol Myers Squib: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Keros Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Arbelaez: Amgen: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Chee: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fong: AbbVie: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Phizer: Consultancy; Novotech: Honoraria; Specialised Therapeutics: Honoraria. Hiwase: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wight: Jannsen: Honoraria, Other: Travel subsidies; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Travel subsidies. Rovaldi: Keros Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Furutani: Keros Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Gaggi: Keros Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Jiang: Keros Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Lachey: Keros Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Natarajan: Keros Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ordonez: Keros Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text