Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Patients with Double-Class Refractory or Triple-Class Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective US Electronic Health Record Database Study

Abstract Introduction: Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) resistant to multiple drug classes remain a high unmet need population, despite advances in MM patient care. The objective of this study was to assess real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with RRMM who had failed multiple prior lines of therapy (LOT) and were refractory to multiple drug classes to identify gaps in their treatment pathways. Methods: This longitudinal retrospective cohort study utilized the COTA de-identified real-world database derived from US electronic health records of partnered healthcare providers from Q3 1988 through Q1 2020. Adults with active RRMM previously exposed to a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory drug and who received ≥3 prior LOTs were identified. Patients were further categorized as refractory to a PI and an immunomodulatory drug (double-class refractory [DCR]) or additionally to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (i.e. daratumumab; triple-class refractory [TCR]). Determining refractory status was based on International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Index LOT was a new LOT after evidence of DCR or TCR status following ≥3 (DCR) or ≥4 (TCR) prior LOTs. Patient characteristics described included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, International Staging System (ISS) stage, cytogenetic risk, age, index date, sex, and follow up time. Treatment pattern assessments included treatments received before/during/after index LOT, reasons for discontinuation, refractory status, and retreatment characteristics. Patient outcomes (overall survival [OS], duration of treatment [DOT], and time to next therapy [TTNT]) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis methods. Results: After excluding patients who were aged <18 years at start of index LOT with no evidence of clinical activity and who participated in a clinical trial during index LOT, 381 (DCR) and 173 (TCR) patients were available for analysis. Median follow-up from index LOT initiation through end of data availability/death was 14 (DCR) and 8 (TCR) months. Demographic characteristics were consistent between DCR and TCR patients. Approximately half were aged ≥65 years (49% DCR; 53% TCR), majority had high-risk cytogenetics (56% DCR; 66% TCR) or prior autologous stem cell transplantation (>62%), and 14-16% had ISS stage III. Patients had a median of 3 (DCR) and 6 (TCR) prior LOTs. Prior to index LOT, bortezomib and lenalidomide were the most commonly received PI and immunomodulatory drug (received by >98% of DCR or TCR patients) and the most common PI and immunomodulatory drugs to which patients were refractory (71% and 84% DCR; 76% and 83% TCR, respectively). At index LOT, PI/immunomodulatory drug-based and daratumumab-based therapies remained the most common therapies. Bortezomib and lenalidomide had the longest time to refractory status and highest retreatment rates among DCR or TCR patients. Approximately 40% of TCR patients were retreated with daratumumab-based therapies after becoming refractory (Table). After index LOT, 70% of DCR and 58% of TCR patients continued to a subsequent LOT. Patients most frequently discontinued index LOT due to disease progression (59% DCR; 60% TCR), toxicity (23% DCR; 25% TCR), or doctor preference (14% DCR; 10% TCR). Median duration of gaps between LOTs generally were shorter than 1 month (Table). Median OS was 22.3 (DCR) and 11.6 (TCR) months. Median DOT was 3.3 (DCR) and 2.8 (TCR) months, and median TTNT was 4.1 (DCR) and 3.2 (TCR) months. In multivariate statistical analyses, inferior baseline ECOG performance scores, and high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities were associated with worse prognosis (higher risk of death, shorter DOT, and shorter TTNT) in DCR and TCR patients. Age was not a significant factor after adjusting for other baseline factors. Conclusions: Treatment options are limited for US patients with DCR and TCR RRMM. DCR and TCR patients were frequently retreated with a PI, an immunomodulatory drug, or daratumumab, despite refractoriness to these agents. Many DCR and TCR MM patients stopped active MM treatment after discontinuing index treatment. Patients with DCR and TCR MM have poor prognosis, especially among high cytogenetic risk and poor performance status patients. This study provides the benchmark for new therapies, like BCMA-targeted agents, to be tested in this population. Funding: GSK (Study 217353). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wang: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Gorsh: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. DerSarkissian: Analysis Group, Inc.: Current Employment. Paka: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bhak: Analysis Group, Inc.: Current Employment; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Boytsov: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zichlin: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Analysis Group, Inc.: Consultancy, Current Employment. Sansbury: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Yee: Analysis Group, Inc.: Current Employment; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Ferrante: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Khanal: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Analysis Group, Inc.: Current Employment. Noman: Analysis Group, Inc.: Current Employment; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Duh: Novartis: Other: I am an employee of Analysis Group, a consulting company that received funding from Novartis for this research study..

Download Full-text

The Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Outcomes of Older Adults with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-118660 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4463-4463

Author(s):

Mark A. Fiala ◽

Tanya M. Wildes ◽

Mark A. Schroeder ◽

Armin Ghobadi ◽

Keith E. Stockerl-Goldstein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Older Adults ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Performance Status ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Improved Outcomes ◽

Immunomodulatory Drug

Abstract Background: Advances in the treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) have dramatically improved outcomes for younger patients. Older adults, particularly those 80 years of age or older at diagnosis, have seen more modest gains. MM incidence increases with age, and as more of the population is living later into life, the segment of the MM population over 80 will continue to grow. In this study, we sought to better understand the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of older patients with MM. Methods: We identified all patients diagnosed with MM at age 80 or older in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database from 2007-2013 to determine incidence and outcomes. Subset analysis was then performed on patients included in the SEER-Medicare linked database who were enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B, and D to further explore patient characteristics and treatment patterns. Results: The incidence of MM increases over age, peaking after age 80. The annual incidence for those aged 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84 and 85+ was 24.4, 32.7, 39.5, 42.8 and 36.4 per 100,000, respectively. Based on 2010 US population estimates, approximately 4,500 new cases of MM were diagnosed annually 2007-2013 in patients age 80 or older. In that period, 8,093 cases, approximately 1,150 per year, were reported to SEER. The estimated median overall survival (OS) of these patients was 14 months (95% CI 13.2-14.8). The estimated relative 12 month survival was 58.9% (95% CI 57.4-60.4) compared to their peers without cancer. Of the 8,093 cases of MM reported to SEER during the study period, 2,385 were present in the SEER-Medicare linked dataset. Of these, 225 were identified as smoldering MM using a previously established algorithm (Fiala, et al, JCOCCI, 2018) and excluded leaving 2,160 for the analyses. The median age was 84 (range 80-100) and 55% were female. 81% were white, 13% black or African-American, and 6% another race. At disease presentation, 22% had claims indicating hypercalcemia, 61% renal failure or chronic kidney disease, 59% anemia, and 34% MM bone involvement. The estimated median OS was 13.4 months (95% CI 12.2-15.1). Only 52% of patients had claims indicating they received systemic MM treatment within 6 months post-diagnosis. Nearly all that did received novel agents; 38% received bortezomib-based treatment, 41% immunomodulatory drug (IMID)-based, and 14% both. The others received antineoplastic chemotherapies such as melphalan or cyclophosphamide. Interestingly, bortezomib utilization increased incrementally from 25% of patients treated in 2007 to 62% in 2013 while IMID utilization declined from 67% to 49%. The median OS of those receiving treatment was 21 months (95% CI 18.5-23.1) compared to 6.3 months (95% CI 5.3-7.3) for those who did not (p <0.0001). MM treatment was associated with a 26% decrease in hazard for death (aHR 0.74; 95% CI 0.67-0.82; p < 0.0001) independent of age, race, gender, poverty, comorbidities, and proxy measures of performance status. Outcomes improved for patients in more recent years; the hazard for death decreased by 3% (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.94-0.99; p = 0.0096) each year 2007-2013. This can be attributed to increasing treatment rates. In 2007, only 41% of patients received treatment compared to 61% in 2013. After controlling for MM treatment, the year of diagnosis was no longer a significant predictor of survival. Conclusions: The outcomes of patients with MM over 80 years old are still relatively poor; nearly half of the patients do not receive systemic treatment and for those who do the median OS is just 21 months. The population over 80, when MM incidence peaks, is projected to triple over the next few decades. It is imperative that we improve our understanding of the needs of this vulnerable subgroup of patients of MM. Disclosures Schroeder: Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vij:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jansson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Real World Prospective Observational Multicenter Trial of Venetoclax-Based Therapy for Patients with AML Reveals Unique Patterns of Patient Selection and Treatment Utilization - Revive Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147245 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1246-1246

Author(s):

Ofir Wolach ◽

Itai Levi ◽

David Lavie ◽

Jonathan Canaani ◽

Sigal Tavor ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Patient Selection ◽

Real World ◽

Research Funding ◽

Early Death ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Related Factors

Abstract Background: Venetoclax-based combinations were recently approved to treat patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Limited prospective 'real-world' data is available on treatment patterns of venetoclax-based therapy in routine clinical practice. We investigated patterns of patient selection, efficacy, toxicity, patient related outcome and post-remission management in a nationwide multicenter prospective observational trial. Methods: Newly diagnosed pts with AML were enrolled at the time of venetoclax-based therapy initiation from 10 medical centers in Israel. Demographic, clinical and patient-related baseline characteristics were documented. Treatment patterns, safety and efficacy outcomes are reported. Results: Between August 12, 2019, and June 17, 2021(data cut) ,127 AML pts were enrolled to receive venetoclax based therapy. Baseline patient and disease characteristics are reported in Table 1. The main reasons for physician's choice of venetoclax-based therapy were age ≥75, comorbidities and ECOG ≥2 (patient related factors) in 76% of cases and adverse disease biology predicting poor response to intensive chemotherapy (disease related factors) in 24% of cases. Most pts started therapy in an inpatient setting, 82 (64.6%) with a median hospitalization duration of 14 days, while 44 pts (34.6%) started therapy as out pts. Pts received a median of 3.8 cycles of therapy (range 1-21). Most pts (97%) received venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents. The full dose of 400mg QD after a median ramp-up duration of 3 days was achieved in 88% of the pts. Dose interruptions and dose modifications during follow-up occurred in 59 (46%) and 30 (24%) of pts, respectively. To allow for adequate follow up for response assessment, efficacy analysis was limited to pts enrolled prior to December 31, 2020, and included 108 pts with a median follow-up of 8 months (range 1-20). As of data cut, 93 pts completed cycle 1 of therapy, 66 pts completed cycle 3 and 39 pts completed cycle 6. 29 pts (27%) are still active on treatment. Best composite complete remission [CCR = complete remission (CR) plus CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi)] was achieved in 62 (57%) pts. CCR rates were assessed in different pre-defined subgroups. Best CCR in pts selected for therapy based on disease-related and patient-related factors were 70% and 54% respectively. Best CCR in pts with AML arising from MPN and pts with other AML were 45% and 58% respectively. Estimated median overall survival (OS) of all pts was 9.6 months (range 7.4-10.6) (Figure 1). Achieving CCR was associated with a superior probability for survival. Estimated median OS was 13.6 months (range 10.6 - not reached) in pts achieving CCR and 4.2 months (range 1.2-10.3) in non-CCR (p<.0001). Of responding pts (CR/CRi, partial remission (PR), morphologic leukemia free state (MLFS), 27 (37%) progressed. Estimated median time to progression was 9.2 months (6.7-NR). Allogeneic transplantation following venetoclax based treatment was offered to 16 (26%) pts with a median age of 71 years (range 43-77). Last documented response prior to transplant was CR in 5 (32%) pts, CRi 9 (56%), MLFS 1 (6%) and PR in 1 (6%) patient. Among grade ≥3 AEs were febrile neutropenia in 28% and infections in 21% of pts. Clinical and laboratory tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) was documented in 2 and 4 pts, respectively. Antifungal prophylaxis was administered in 20% of pts and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) support was used in 17% of pts in response. Early death rate at 30 and 60 days were 7% and 13%, respectively. Conclusion: This prospective real-world analysis reveals unique patterns of patient selection and venetoclax treatment utilization in a medical system with wide access for this indication. Venetoclax-based therapies are effective and associated with manageable toxicity, including in AML patient populations that were excluded from previous registration trials with comparable CCR and early death rates. Factors associated with patient selection in the 'real-world' setting and immature follow up data most probably led to a shorter estimated median OS in this analysis as compared to controlled trials. The REVIVE study continues to expand and is expected to provide additional insights on treatment patterns, management as well as clinical and patient related outcomes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wolach: Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Neopharm: Consultancy. Levi: AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lavie: AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Fees for lectures; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Fees for lectures; Roche: Other: Fees for lectures; Novartis: Other: Fees for lectures. Tavor: AbbVie: Consultancy. Hellmann: AbbVie: Consultancy. Tadmor: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Zuckerman: Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Cellect Biotechnology: Honoraria; BioSight Ltd: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Orgenesis Inc.: Honoraria. Stemer: AbbVie: Consultancy. Berelovich: AbbVie: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ofek: AbbVie: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Frankel: AbbVie: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Grunspan: AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: May hold equity. Ofran: Medison Israel: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Moshe: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lectures; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lectures; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lectures.

Download Full-text

Treatment Patterns and Economic Burden Among Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Hypomethylating Agents: A SEER-Medicare Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-145593 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4975-4975

Author(s):

Andrew M. Brunner ◽

David Huggar ◽

Ronda Copher ◽

Zheng-Yi Zhou ◽

Miriam L. Zichlin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Induction Therapy ◽

Economic Burden ◽

Research Funding ◽

Index Date ◽

Baseline Period ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Patient Costs ◽

Analysis Group ◽

Remission Phase

Abstract Introduction: Previously, we assessed the economic burden of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) among Medicare patients and found that the economic burden of relapse is high, at approximately 1.2 and 1.6 times the monthly per-patient costs associated with early and late post-remission therapy, respectively (Tabah A, et al. Blood 2020:136(suppl 1):45). A notably high proportion of patients (55%) received ≥ 1 cycle of a hypomethylating agent (HMA). Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the economic burden of AML among a subgroup of elderly patients who received only HMA monotherapy during induction and then achieved disease remission. Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with various phases (ie, induction, post-remission therapy, and post-relapse) were assessed. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, which comprised Medicare claims (parts A, B, and D from 2007 through 2016) and the US National Cancer Institute's SEER database (cancer diagnoses from 2007 to 2015). Included patients had an AML diagnosis in the SEER registry, were ≥ 65 years of age at the AML diagnosis date, had initiated HMA (and no other active treatment) in the outpatient (OP) setting during the first induction cycle post-AML diagnosis, and had an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth/Tenth Revision (ICD-9/10) diagnosis code for AML remission following the initiation of induction therapy. Patients were excluded if they had another blood malignancy (including a history of myelodysplastic syndromes), had received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, or were enrolled in a clinical trial. The induction therapy period was defined as the first initiation of HMA post diagnosis (index date) to the end of the cycle during which a patient had a code for AML remission. The 6-month period prior to the index date was defined as the baseline period. The post-remission phase ended at the earliest of relapse or end of follow-up (ie, death, end of eligibility, or end of available data [December 31, 2016]). The post-relapse phase was from the date of first AML relapse ICD-9/10 code after remission to the end of follow-up. Patient characteristics during the baseline period were summarized descriptively. HCRU and costs (adjusted to 2019 US dollars) associated with induction and post-remission therapy were assessed during days that were part of a treatment cycle. The average per-patient monthly HCRU and costs were reported for the induction, post-remission, and post-relapse phases. Results: A total of 71 patients with newly diagnosed AML (azacitidine: n = 31; decitabine: n = 40) received HMA induction therapy and achieved remission. The median age at AML diagnosis was 78.8 years, 50.7% of patients were male, and 85.9% were White. The mean ± standard deviation (median) time from index date to the end of follow-up was 16.0 ± 12.3 (14.0) months. A total of 63.4% of patients (n = 45) received post-remission therapy. Among all patients, 43.7% relapsed and 85.9% died by the end of follow-up. OP visits were the most common type of visit across all phases with 95.6% of patients having ≥ 1 OP visit during post-remission therapy and 83.9% during the post-relapse phase. Inpatient (IP) visits were highest in the post-relapse phase with 77.4% of patients having ≥ 1 IP visit. The monthly mean per-patient healthcare costs were highest for the post-relapse phase, followed by post-remission therapy, and induction (Table). Costs associated with the OP setting were the greatest contributor to the induction costs (48.9%) while costs associated with the IP setting were the drivers of the costs in the post-remission therapy (56.2%) and post-relapse (72.8%) phases. Conclusions: The economic burden of AML treated with HMA induction therapy was highest in the post-relapse phase, at approximately 1.7 and 1.6 times the monthly per-patient costs during the induction and post-remission therapy phases, respectively. In addition, IP costs made up nearly two-thirds of total monthly per-patient costs in the post-relapse phase, up from approximately 44% and 56% of the induction and post-remission therapy phases, respectively. Treatment options that extend the post-remission phase would reduce the high economic burden associated with AML relapse. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Brunner: Celgene, Forty Seven Inc, Jazz: Other: Advisory Board; Novartis, Celgene, Takeda, AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Huggar: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Copher: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zhou: Sanofi: Research Funding; Analysis Group: Current Employment, Other: Employee of Analysis Group which received consulting fees for this project . Zichlin: Analysis Group, Inc.: Consultancy, Current Employment; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Anderson: Analysis Group, which received consultancy fees from GSK: Consultancy, Current Employment. Downes: nalysis Group (employment), Bristol Myers Squibb (consultancy): Consultancy, Current Employment. McBride: BMS: Current Employment.

Download Full-text

Economic Burden of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Retrospective Study Using the SEER-Medicare Database

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136768 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 45-45

Author(s):

Ashley Tabah ◽

David Huggar ◽

Krystal Huey ◽

Ronda Copher ◽

Zheng-Yi Zhou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Economic Burden ◽

Research Funding ◽

Index Date ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Analysis Group ◽

Remission Period ◽

Medicare Database

Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) poses significant economic burden on the healthcare system, particularly during induction therapy and at disease relapse. The burden associated with ongoing post-remission therapy is less clear. In patients diagnosed with AML enrolled in Medicare who received an induction therapy and achieved disease remission, we assessed the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with each disease period (induction, early/late post-remission, and post-relapse). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, comprising Medicare claims (parts A, B, and D from 2007 to 2016) and the US National Cancer Institute's SEER database (cancer diagnoses from 2007 to 2015). Identified patients had a diagnosis of AML in the SEER registry, were ≥ 65 years at the AML diagnosis date, initiated chemotherapy post-AML diagnosis (i.e. induction), and had an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth/Tenth Revision (ICD-9/10) diagnosis code for AML remission following the start of therapy. Patients were excluded if they had another blood malignancy, had received a prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant, or were enrolled in a clinical trial. Induction was defined as any therapy received from the date of first post-diagnosis chemotherapy initiation (index date) to the end of the cycle during which a patient had an ICD-9/10 code for AML remission. The 6 months prior to the index date was defined as the baseline period. Post-remission therapy was divided into an early post-remission period, which included any therapy initiated within the first 60 days (≤ 60 d) after end of induction, and a late post-remission period, which included therapy initiated more than 60 days (> 60 d) after end of induction. If specific treatment information was available, late post-remission therapy was defined by a treatment switch occurring > 60 d after end of induction. Post-remission therapy ended at the earliest of relapse or end of follow-up (i.e., death, end of eligibility, or end of available data [December 31, 2016]). The post-relapse period was from the date of first AML relapse ICD-9/10 code after remission to the end of follow-up. Baseline patient characteristics, as well as HCRU and costs (adjusted to 2019 US dollars) during the baseline, induction, post-remission, and post-relapse periods, were summarized descriptively. HCRU and costs associated with induction and post-remission therapy periods were assessed during days that were part of a treatment cycle. The average per patient per month (PPPM) HCRU and costs were reported. Duration of response (DoR) from the first remission to the earliest of relapse or death was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: A total of 530 patients were identified. The median age at AML diagnosis was 73 years, 53.6% of patients were male, and 80.6% were white. The median time from index date to the end of follow-up was 13.5 months. Most patients received therapy with hypomethylating agents during the AML treatment. A total of 31.9% of patients who achieved remission did not receive post-remission therapy during follow-up; for these patients, mean (median) time from end of induction to relapse or end of follow-up was 125 (23) days. A total of 63.2% of patients received chemotherapy in the early post-remission period, and 43.0% of all patients went on to receive chemotherapy in the late post-remission period. The median DoR was 5.8 months; a total of 48.9% of patients had relapsed and 80.2% had died by the end of follow-up. The mean PPPM healthcare costs were highest for induction, followed by post-relapse, early post-remission, and late post-remission periods (Table). Costs associated with the inpatient (IP) setting were the greatest contributor to PPPM costs across all periods. IP visits were most common during induction with 92.1% of patients having ≥ 1 IP visit, relative to 53.8% during baseline, 65.7% during early post-remission, 71.5% during late post-remission, and 91.1% post-relapse. Conclusions: The economic burden of relapse is approximately 1.2 and 1.6 times higher than the mean PPPM healthcare costs during early and late post-remission periods, respectively. There exists a large unmet need for therapies that will extend the duration of the post-remission period and reduce the overall economic burden of AML. Disclosures Tabah: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Huggar:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; FibroGen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Huey:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Copher:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Zhou:BMS: Other: Employee of Analysis Group Inc., which received consulting fees. Zichlin:BMS: Other: Employee of Analysis Group Inc., which received consulting fees. Koenigsberg:BMS: Other: Employee of Analysis Group Inc., which received consulting fees. Brunner:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Forty-Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Comparable Overall Survival with Rituximab-Bendamustine (R-Benda) and Rituximab-Gemcitabine-Oxaliplatin (R-GemOx) When Used As Second-Line (2L) Treatment for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): A Real-World Study Using US Veterans Health Administration Data

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-113039 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1711-1711 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Raluca Ionescu-Ittu ◽

Aijing Shang ◽

Nancy Vander Velde ◽

Annie Guérin ◽

Yilu Lin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Real World ◽

Research Funding ◽

Veterans Health Administration ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Veterans Health ◽

Health Administration ◽

Real World Data ◽

Analysis Group ◽

Kaplan Meier

Abstract Introduction: DLBCL is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) is established as the standard of care for patients (pts) with previously untreated DLBCL, but ~40% of pts will eventually relapse. For relapsed/refractory pts who are ineligible for transplant, clinical guidelines propose a broad spectrum of therapeutic options. However, little is known about treatment patterns and outcomes associated with 2L therapy in routine practice, particularly for pts less suitable for intensive therapy. Therefore, using real-world data, we evaluated 2L treatment patterns in DLBCL pts and overall survival (OS) in those pts who received 2L R-Benda or R-GemOx. We focused on these 2 treatments as they are typically used in the non-transplant setting in pts less suitable for aggressive therapy, and can typically be administered in an outpatient setting. Methods: DLBCL pts receiving care from the US Veterans Health Administration were identified through their electronic medical records and raw oncology domain. Pts diagnosed with DLBCL (and no prior other types of malignancies) between 2004-2016, with ≥1-month follow-up and who received 2L treatment were included. OS (defined as time from the start of 2L therapy until death) was analyzed in pts who received 2L R-Benda or R-GemOx using the Kaplan-Meier method. Surviving pts were censored at data cutoff (December 31, 2017). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were undertaken to assess the impact of 2L treatment (in particular, R-GemOx vs R-Benda) on OS. Results: A total of 2600 DLBCL pts were identified: 2039 received 1L and 702 received 1L and 2L therapy. Among the 702 pts treated with 2L therapy, regimens included R-ICE (n=77; 11.0%), R-CHOP (n=75; 10.7%), rituximab monotherapy (n=34; 4.8%), R-Benda (n=32; 4.6%), methotrexate (n=24; 3.4%), R-ESHAP (n=23; 3.3%), R-DHAP/R-EPOCH/R-GDP (n=18; 2.6%), rituximab plus cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vinblastine-vincristine (n=14; 2.0%), R-CVP (n=11; 1.6%), rituximab plus cyclophosphamide-etoposide-vincristine (n=11; 1.6%), and R-GemOx (n=10; 1.4%). Of the remaining pts, 267 (38.0%) received regimens with agent(s) included in the NCCN guidelines, while 106 (15.1%) received regimens with at least 1 agent not guideline-recommended. Baseline characteristics for pts treated with 2L R-Benda (n=32) or R-GemOx (n=10) are shown in Table 1. There was an imbalance between the 2 cohorts with regard to race, number of involved lymph nodes, B symptoms, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and abnormal lactate dehydrogenase results. After 24 deaths in the R-Benda cohort and 7 deaths in the R-GemOx cohort, median OS was estimated at 11 and 13 months, respectively (Figure 1). Median follow-up time after start of 2L treatment was 11.3 and 11.7 months, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier curves of the 2 cohorts overlapped at multiple timepoints during follow-up. Respective 1-year OS rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) with R-Benda and R-GemOx were 50.0% (31.9%, 65.7%) and 60.0% (25.3%, 82.7%). Compared with R-Benda, R-GemOx did not significantly predict longer OS in either the univariate (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.41, 2.19; p=0.893) or multivariate (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.46, 2.50; p=0.873) analyses. Conclusions: This real-world study highlights the diversity of 2L treatment regimens used in DLBCL pts. There was no apparent difference in OS between R-Benda- and R-GemOx-treated pts and, with a median OS of approximately 1 year after 2L initiation with either regimen, there is clearly an unmet need in this setting. The main limitation of the study relates to the small sample size of each treatment cohort. Further research using other real-world data sources is warranted. Disclosures Ionescu-Ittu: Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment; F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Other: I am an employee of Analysis Group, Inc., which received consulting fees from Roche for the conduct of this study. Shang:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: Employment, Other: Ownership interests non-PLC. Guérin:F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Other: I am an employee of Analysis Group, Inc., which received consulting fees from Roche for the conduct of this study; Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Shi:F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; Bravo4Health: Other: Ownership interests non-PLC; Genentech: Research Funding; Chiasma: Research Funding; Intuitive Surgical: Consultancy. Shi:F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Other: I am an employee of Analysis Group, Inc., which received consulting fees from Roche for the conduct of this study; Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Qayum:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment.

Download Full-text

A Retrospective Analysis of Treatment Patterns in Elderly Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Dasatinib or Nilotinib As Second-Line Therapy after Imatinib

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.1293.1293 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 1293-1293

Author(s):

B. Douglas Smith ◽

Jun Liu ◽

Dominick Latremouille-Viau ◽

Zhou Zhou ◽

Annie Guerin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Elderly Patients ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Index Date ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Harvard University ◽

Second Line ◽

Analysis Group ◽

Percentage Points

Abstract Introduction: Dasatinib and nilotinib are second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) originally approved as second-line treatment for patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph+ CML) in chronic phase resistant or intolerant to imatinib. Despite the fact that one half of patients with CML are ≥65 years of age, elderly patients are often under-recruited in clinical trials and there are few studies that focus on these often medically complex patients. This study aimed to compare treatment patterns of elderly CML patients initiating dasatinib vs nilotinib as second-line TKI therapy after imatinib therapy in a real-world setting. Methods: Elderly Medicare beneficiaries (≥65 years old) with ≥2 CML diagnoses who initiated dasatinib or nilotinib following prior treatment with imatinib were identified in the Medicare Research Identifiable Files (RIF) from 2006 to 2012. Selected patients were continuously covered by Part A (i.e., institutional claims), Part B (i.e., non-institutional claims), and Part D (i.e., drug events) for ≥6 months before and ≥1 month after the second-line TKI therapy initiation date (i.e., index date). Patients were excluded from the study if they were enrolled in a clinical trial, had a stem-cell transplant, or received chemotherapy (except hydroxyurea) within the 6 months before the index date (i.e., baseline period). Patients were classified as dasatinib users or nilotinib users based on the second-line TKI therapy. Dose decreases and increases, defined as a dose change of ≥20mg for dasatinib and ≥100mg for nilotinib compared to the initial dose, were measured from the index date up to the end of follow-up or treatment discontinuation. Treatment adherence was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC) during the 6- and 12-month periods following the index date and among patients with continuous insurance coverage during these periods. Treatment persistence, measured between the index date and the end of follow-up, included time to treatment discontinuation (i.e., a treatment gap of ≥30 consecutive days) or switch to another TKI. Multivariate regression analyses were used to test for statistical significance while adjusting for potential confounding factors. Results: Of the 659 patients that met the sample selection criteria, 379 were dasatinib users and 280 were nilotinib users. The average age was 76 years (inter-quartile range 70 – 81) and 62% were female. After the index date, 88% of selected patients were observed for ≥6 months and 73% for ≥12 months. The average patient follow-up was 24 months (median=22 months). Dasatinib users were more likely to start on the recommended dose compared to nilotinib users (74% vs 53%; p<.001); only 15% of dasatinib users started on a dose ≤70mg/day and 10% started on 140mg/day; also 18% of nilotinib users started on ≤400mg/day and 24% started on 600mg/day. Dose reductions were almost twice as common in dasatinib users (21% vs 11%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=1.94; p=.002) and dose increases were also more common in dasatinib users (9% vs 7%; adjusted HR=1.81; p=.048) compared with nilotinib users. During the 6- and 12-month periods following the index date, dasatinib and nilotinib users had similar adherence level (6-month period: average PDC=78% for dasatinib vs 76% for nilotinib, adjusted mean difference=1.19 percentage points, p=.520; 12-month period: average PDC=69% for dasatinib vs 70% for nilotinib, adjusted mean difference=-1.37 percentage points, p=.570). Nilotinib users were more persistent compared to dasatinib users as fewer patients discontinued (59% vs 67%; adjusted HR=0.79; p=.024) or switched to another TKI treatment (21% vs 29%; adjusted HR=0.72; p=.049). Conclusion: There are little data available on treatment patterns of elderly CML patients. This study suggests that it is hard to determine the right starting dose of drug in elderly patients receiving a second generation TKI following treatment with imatinib. Interestingly, those receiving nilotinib had fewer dose adjustments (decreases or increases) and were more persistent (fewer discontinuation and switching) compared to those receiving dasatinib despite having similar levels of adherence over the first 6- and 12-month periods following the treatment initiation. Studies which focus on patients with elderly CML may help to provide better treatment guidelines for this important population. Disclosures Liu: Jun Liu is an employee of Harvard University which has received research funding from Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Latremouille-Viau:Dominick Latremouille-Viau is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which has received consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Zhou:Zhou Zhou is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which has received consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Guerin:Annie Guerin is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which has received consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Fernandez:Daniel Fernandez is an employee of Harvard University which has received research funding from Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Yi:Dingdong Yi is an employee of Harvard University which has received research funding from Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Wang:Xufei Wang is an employee of Harvard University which has received research funding from Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Wu:Eric Q. Wu is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which has received consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Mhatre:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Keir:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chen:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment; Novartis: stock options Other.

Download Full-text

First Results from a Nationwide Prospective Non-Interventional Study of Venetoclax-Based 1st Line Therapies in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) - Revive Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139923 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 27-28

Author(s):

Ofir Wolach ◽

Itai Levi ◽

Jonathan Canaani ◽

Tamar Tadmor ◽

Sigal Tavor ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Performance Status ◽

Hypomethylating Agents ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Related Factors ◽

Real World Setting

Background: The outcome of elderly patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is poor and treatment options in these high-risk groups are limited. Recently, venetoclax combinations with hypomethylating agents or low dose cytarabine were approved to treat patients with AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. However limited prospective data is available on the safety and efficacy of venetoclax treatment in routine clinical practice. Israel is among the first countries to have approved venetoclax-based combinations as first line therapy for AML and this treatment is fully reimbursed via the national health system. Here we present the initial results of a prospective, multicenter, nationwide trial that sought to assess the use of venetoclax-based therapy in a real-world setting. Methods: A prospective observational nationwide multicenter trial. Newly diagnosed patients with AML were enrolled at the time of venetoclax-based therapy initiation. Demographic, clinical and patient-related baseline characteristics were documented. Treatment patterns, safety and efficacy outcomes are reported. Patient related outcomes were assessed at baseline and after cycle 3 using the EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires. Results: A total of 70 patients were enrolled between August 2019 and June 2020 (data cut off) with a median age of 75 years (range 45-88) and a median follow-up of 74 days (8-232). Two-thirds of patients were males (62.9%). Over one-quarter (28.6%) of patients had an ECOG performance status of 2 or higher; the median modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 0 (range 1-4) with 27.1% with a CCI ≥2. De-novo AML was documented in 44.3%, secondary AML was diagnosed in 52.8% (secondary to MDS (27.1%), MPNs (11.4%) and therapy related AML (14.3%)). European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk category was favorable, intermediate and adverse in 8.6%, 30% and 42.9%, respectively (Table 1). Time from diagnosis to initiation of therapy was 8 days (median, range 1-38). The main reasons for choosing venetoclax-based low intensity therapy as reported by treating physicians were patient related factors (mainly age>75 years, performance status) in the majority of cases and adverse disease biology predicting poor response to intensive chemotherapy in 17.1%. Of the 57 patients with available data, 38 (67%) initiated therapy in an inpatient setting with a median hospitalization duration of 12 days (range 1-62 days) and 19 (33%) patients started therapy as outpatients. By data cutoff, of 63 patients that initiated therapy 45, 23 and 7 patients completed cycle 1, cycle 3 and cycle 6 assessments, respectively. Complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) was achieved in 23/44 (52.3%) patients that were assessed for best response. Of responding patients, 6 (23%, 5 CRi and 1 Partial Remission (PR)) went on to receive an allogeneic transplantation (median age 70.5 years). Ninety percent of patients received venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents (azacytidine n=56, decitabine n=1). The full dose of 400mg was administered in 87% of cases with a median ramp-up duration of 3 days. Dose interruptions, dose modifications and dose discontinuations during follow-up were frequent and occurred in 41%, 35% and 27%, respectively. During therapy 63.5% of patients experienced adverse events (AE) of any grade; severe AE's were recorded in 41.3% of patients. Febrile neutropenia was documented in 22.2% and Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) was documented in 2 patients (grade 2; 3.2%). Early death rates at 30 and 60 days were 6.3% and 11.1%, respectively. Conclusion: In the real-world setting venetoclax-based therapies are effective and associated with manageable toxicity including in the outpatient setting. In routine practice patient-related factors and disease-related factors (disease-risk) both seem to play a role in choice of therapy. Venetoclax treatment in real-life practice in Israel appears to follow general recommendations, is tolerable with approximately 90% of patients achieving target dose. These observational data are expected to provide information on patient selection patterns, efficacy and safety and patient related outcomes in patients not in clinical trial. Table Disclosures Wolach: AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Fees for lectures and Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Fees for lectures and Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Fees for lectures and Consultancy; Amgen: Other: Fees for lectures and Consultancy; Janssen: Other: Fees for lectures and Consultancy. Levi:Abbvie Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Canaani:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Tadmor:AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Medison: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Neopharm: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; 6. Novartis Israel Ltd., a company wholly owned by Novartis Pharma AG: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Tavor:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hellmann:Abbvie: Research Funding. Stemer:Abbvie: Research Funding. Cohen:Abbvie Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Afik:Abbvie Inc: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ofek:Abbvie Inc: Current Employment. Banayan:Abbvie Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Kan:Abbvie Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Grunspan:Abbvie Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ofran:AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moshe:Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

An Oncology Simulation Model to Estimate 10-Year Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival Based on the 5-Year Update from the ECHELON-2 Trial in Frontline Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: A United States Perspective

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148004 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2466-2466

Author(s):

John M. Burke ◽

Kristina S. Yu ◽

Uche Mordi ◽

Brian Bloudek ◽

Nicholas Liu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Brentuximab Vedotin ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Free Survival ◽

Number Of Patients

Abstract Objectives Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a rare and aggressive type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) associated with a poor prognosis. Common frontline (1L) regimens include brentuximab vedotin plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (A+CHP), and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone with or without the addition of etoposide (CHOP and CHOEP, respectively). Based on the 5-year update of the ECHELON-2 trial, patients with previously untreated CD30-expressing PTCL on A+CHP continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with CHOP. Our objective was to estimate the future number of patients alive and progression free with A+CHP over 10-years, based on the 5-year follow-up results from ECHELON-2. Methods An oncology simulation model, from the United States perspective, was developed with a 1-month cycle length that estimates population-level outcomes of PTCL patients based on disease incidence, treatment patterns, PFS, and OS of commonly used regimens for PTCL. Incidence of PTCL, 19.26 cases per 100,000 persons, was derived using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) estimates for NHL in 2020 and the estimated proportion of PTCL cases (~4%) within the NHL category, provided by the Lymphoma Research Foundation. To populate the base case model, treatment patterns following 1L utilization of CHOP (65%) and CHOEP (35%) were varied over time and compared to A+CHP (40%). The model also includes a portion of patients in remission in 1L who are eligible to receive transplant therapy. Additional model inputs were derived from: 1) ECHELON-2, with 5-year PFS rates of 51.4% (95% CI 42.8, 59.4) for A+CHP, 43.0% (95% CI 35.8, 50.0) for CHOP, and OS HR 0.72 (95% 0.53, 0.99); 2) published literature to inform PFS for consolidation and subsequent lines of therapy; and 3) expert clinicians' opinion on commonly used regimens for relapsed/refractory PTCL (included in the model were brentuximab vedotin, romidepsin, pralatrexate, ifosfamide in combination with carboplatin and etoposide [ICE], and gemcitabine-based regimens). Annual prevalence of patients living progression-free with PTCL in the 1L setting with each prescribed scenario was estimated for 10 years (year 2031) with and without the availability of A+CHP. Results The cumulative number of patients with newly diagnosed PTCL between 2026 and 2031 was estimated at 8,020. The number of patients alive and progression-free based on 1L treatment was estimated at 6,304 in a scenario without A+CHP and 7,414 with A+CHP (Δ+1,110, 17.6% increase) in 2031. It was also estimated that 1,203 patients would progress to second-line treatment with CHOP vs 1,119 patients with 1L A+CHP (Δ-84, 7.0% decrease) in 2031. Conclusions The durable and significant improvements in PFS and OS of A+CHP vs CHOP in the 5-year follow-up data from ECHELON-2 estimated an increase in the number of 1L PTCL patients who remain progression free and alive for greater than 10 years. This improvement in outcomes may translate into an increased prevalence of PTCL patients, reflecting an increased number of patients in remission and options to undergo transplant therapy when necessary. Disclosures Burke: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; SeaGen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Epizyme: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; X4 Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Kymera: Consultancy; MorphoSys: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy. Yu: Seagen, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bloudek: Seagen, Inc: Consultancy. Liu: Seagen, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fanale: Seagen, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Phillips: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Other: received travel expenses from Incyte, Research Funding; ADCT, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, Incyte, Karyopharm, Morphosys, Pharmacyclics, Seattle Genetics: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent Treatment Approaches and Outcomes in the United States

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146461 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4657-4657

Author(s):

Kristin M. Zimmerman Savill ◽

Ajeet Gajra ◽

Kwanza Price ◽

Jonathan K. Kish ◽

Cherrishe Brown-Bickerstaff ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Data Collection ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Systemic Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Independent Contractor ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) comprise a group of clonal hematopoietic disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, cytopenias, dysplasia in ≥ 1 cell line, cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities, and variable risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Treatment goals for MDS classified as lower-risk (LR-MDS) include transfusion independence, improvement in hemoglobin (Hb) levels, and maintenance of or improvement in quality of life. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are the first-line (1L) treatment for anemia in most patients with LR-MDS lacking del(5q), but a proportion of patients do not respond to ESA treatment, or experience progression of anemia despite ESA treatment. The objective of this real-world analysis was to describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns (including ESA use), and outcomes in patients with LR-MDS. Methods: A retrospective, observational, US multisite, cohort study was conducted among adult patients initially diagnosed with LR-MDS between January 1, 2017 and June 25, 2020. Eligible patients had ≥ 1 year of follow-up after diagnosis (unless the patient died during this time) and did not receive luspatercept or any MDS treatment as part of a randomized, controlled trial. Community oncologists abstracted data from medical records, and descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes. Data presented are from an interim analysis of an ongoing study; the last date of data collection for this analysis was July 6, 2021. Results: Among 125 eligible patients with LR-MDS, median follow-up time was 16 months, and 83% of patients were still alive at the time of data collection. In the 8 weeks prior to diagnosis, 54% of patients did not receive any red blood cell (RBC) or platelet transfusions, while 42% and 4% had low or moderate transfusion burden, respectively. Overall, 75% of patients were negative for del(5q), and 80% of patients were negative for ring sideroblasts (RS). At diagnosis of LR-MDS, serum erythropoietin levels were < 200 U/L in 49% of patients, ≥ 200 U/L in 25%, and unknown in 26%. In terms of disease management, 35% of patients did not receive any systemic therapy or transfusions, 14% received RBC and/or platelet transfusions, but no systemic therapy for MDS, and 50% were reported to have received ≤ 2 lines of systemic therapy following LR-MDS diagnosis (Table). Of the 42% of patients who received an ESA, 70% received an ESA for MDS as a single agent (SA) only, 15% as combination therapy only, and 8% as both SA and combination therapy. A further 8% received SA ESA followed by a non-ESA-based regimen. Among 45 patients who received SA ESA as 1L treatment, 18% went on to receive a hypomethylating agent (HMA) or immunomodulatory imide drug as an SA, or ESA combined with HMA or a granulocyte or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF/GM-CSF) in a subsequent line. Among patients who received an ESA, 72% were still on ESA-based therapy at the time of data collection. Abstracting physicians reported that 17% of patients who received an ESA failed ESA treatment. Among these patients, physicians' determination of ESA failure was based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines/International Working Group 2006 response criteria for 78% of patients, and on physicians' own clinical judgement for 22%. At data collection, ESA was still being administered to 22% of patients considered to have failed ESA treatment. Finally, 34% of those who received an ESA also received RBC transfusion(s) during ESA-based treatment and therefore were not transfusion independent for the entire duration of ESA-based treatment (Table). Conclusions: Results from this real-world cohort study indicate that over a third of patients with LR-MDS have been managed using watchful waiting only, with no systemic treatment or transfusions received; among those patients who received treatment, most received an ESA. Nearly one-fifth of patients in this study treated with an ESA were considered to have failed ESA treatment by abstracting physicians, though this proportion is likely to be higher with extended follow-up; 2 of 9 patients who failed ESA treatment were still receiving an ESA. Further research including longer follow-up is warranted to understand how patients with LR-MDS respond to different treatment regimens. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Zimmerman Savill: Cardinal Health: Current Employment; Roche/Genentech: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Gajra: Cardinal Health: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Price: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Kish: Cardinal Health: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Research Funding. Brown-Bickerstaff: Cardinal Health: Current Employment. Falkenstein: Cardinal Health: Current Employment. Miller: Cardinal Health: Current Employment. Laney: Cardinal Health: Current Employment. Mukherjee: Acceleron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research/Independent Contractor, Research Funding; McGraw Hill: Honoraria, Other: Editor of Hematology Oncology Board Review (ongoing); Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research/Independent Contractor, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AAMDS in Joint Partnership with Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute: Honoraria; Eusa Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Teaching and Speaking; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioPharm: Consultancy; Partnership for Health Analytic Research: Honoraria; Blueprint Medicines: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Resource Utilization and Associated Costs Among Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Later Lines of Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136074 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 8-9

Author(s):

Ehab L. Atallah ◽

Rodrigo Maegawa ◽

Dominick Latremouille-Viau ◽

Carmine Rossi ◽

Annie Guerin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Medical Costs ◽

Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Pharmaceutical Corporation ◽

Analysis Group ◽

Ed Visits ◽

The Mean ◽

Line Of Therapy

Introduction: Despite advances in tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), there remains a sizeable proportion of patients (pts) with CML in chronic phase who are refractory or intolerant to these agents. A good understanding of the most recent real-world patterns of care in these pts is necessary in order to provide context for assessing the potential benefits of new treatments undergoing clinical development. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment patterns in CML pts cycling through TKI therapies achieving later lines of therapy, and to estimate their healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs. Methods: Adult pts with CML in the United States who received at least 3 lines of TKI therapy were identified in the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplement databases (Q1/2001-Q2/2019). Treatment patterns were observed from CML diagnosis. Pt characteristics were measured during the 6 months prior to third line (3L) initiation (baseline period). All-cause HRU (inpatient [IP] admissions and days, days with outpatient [OP] services, and emergency department [ED] visits) and costs (medical and pharmacy) were measured 1) during the course of 3L therapy (from 3L initiation to termination) and 2) between 3L initiation and end of follow-up (stem cell transplant [SCT], or end of data availability/health plan coverage). HRU was reported using monthly incidence rates per 100 pts (IR/100pts); costs (2019 USD) were evaluated per-pt-per-month (PPPM) from a payer's perspective. Results: Of the 48,168 pts identified with CML, a total of 296 CML pts initiated 3L therapy; median age was 58.5 years (30% were aged ≥65 years) and 50% were female. The mean follow-up period from CML diagnosis was 57.8 months and from 3L initiation was 24.5 months. Most pts had their first CML diagnosis in or after 2010 (71%) and achieved 3L in or after 2014 (50%). At baseline, the mean modified Charlson Comorbidity Index score (excluding CML) was 1.6 with 24% of pts with a score ≥3, 64% of pts had a moderate or severe Darkow Disease Complexity Index, and the most prevalent comorbidities were hypertension (45%) and diabetes (25%); 21% of pts (i.e., ≥1 indicator of congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, or end-stage renal disease, or ≥75 years old). The most common sequences of TKIs from first line (1L) to 3L were imatinib → dasatinib → nilotinib (28%), imatinib → nilotinib → dasatinib (16%), imatinib → dasatinib → imatinib (9%), and dasatinib → imatinib → nilotinib (5%). The mean duration of 1L, second line (2L), and 3L therapy was 14.9, 10.4, and 15.6 months, respectively; 62% of pts were still in 3L at the end of follow-up. Only one patient received SCT after 3L. The most common TKIs received at each line were imatinib in 1L (65%), dasatinib in 2L (49%), and nilotinib in 3L (36%). The mean treatment-free period (time between line of therapy termination and next line initiation) between 1L and 2L was 1.3 months, 2.6 months between 2L and 3L, and 1.5 months between 3L and 4L. During 3L therapy, pts had a monthly IR/100pts of 3.4 IP admissions, 21.2 IP days, 248.8 OP days, and 10.2 ED visits (Figure 1A). Pharmacy costs accounted for 69% of the mean total costs of $15,192 PPPM, with medical costs accounting for the remainder (Figure 1B). In 3L therapy and later, pts had a monthly IR/100pts of 3.5 IP admissions, 28.7 IP days, 252.2 OP days, and 10.0 ED visits (Figure 1A). Pharmacy costs accounted for 49% of the mean total costs of $18,767 PPPM, with medical costs mainly driven by IP costs (Figure 1B). Conclusions: This study characterized CML pts receiving later lines of therapy, a clinical population which has not been previously well studied with important unmet treatment needs as they repetitively fail TKI therapy. Although the majority of pts were likely fit for SCT, SCT was rare. In addition, pts quickly switched to the subsequent line of therapy, both facts suggesting that an important proportion of pts were intolerant to previous TKIs. While pharmacy costs accounted for nearly half of the total cost burden during 3L, the proportion of medical costs PPPM took more importance following 3L therapy, with IP costs being the primary cost drivers for this increase. These findings support the need for better treatment options in pts with CML undergoing later lines of therapy. Disclosures Atallah: Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy. Maegawa:Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Latremouille-Viau:Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Consultancy, Other: Dominique Latremouille-Viau is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which received consultancy fees from Novartis.; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Other: Dominique Latremouille-Viau is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which received consultancy fees from Sanofi Genzyme.. Rossi:Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Consultancy, Other: Carmine Rossi is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which received consultancy fees from Novartis.. Guerin:Abbvie: Consultancy, Other; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Other: Annie Guerin is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which received consultancy fees from Sanofi Genzyme.; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Other: Annie Guerin is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which received consultancy fees from Novartis.. Patwardhan:Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Download Full-text