scholarly journals "My T Cell": A Smartphone Application for Guidance of CAR T Logistics and Management of CAR T & BiTE Related Toxicities

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1926-1926
Author(s):  
Viktoria Blumenberg ◽  
Lisa Siegmund ◽  
Lisa Frölich ◽  
Kai Rejeski ◽  
Friederike Hildebrandt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Smartphone Application ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Interactive Tools ◽  
Car T ◽  
Specific Management ◽  
Support Research

Abstract The Bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) Blinatumomab and CD19-specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell products are approved for the treatment of relapsed and refractory B-cell neoplasms. However, these T-cell based immunotherapies can be accompanied by immune-related toxicities differing from adverse events of classical cytotoxic agents. Toxicity management can pose a challenge for health care professionals. Additionally, logistics of CAR T-cell patient management, particularly with regard to timelines of apheresis, bridging therapies, and CAR T-cell transfusion, require coordinated efforts between referring physicians and treatment centers. To support the optimal management of these patients, we developed an interactive smartphone application ("myTcell") which educates physicians in the pre-treatment logistics of CARs and BiTEs and provides recommendations on management and treatment of immune-related toxicities. We initiated a multi-step content development process with an extensive literature research of toxicity guidelines consented by the ASTCT, SITC, NCCN and EBMT as well as of officially released drug information. Findings were integrated in an information platform to provide diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations as well as algorithms for interactive toxicity grading tools. We could successfully implement an app ("myTcell") guiding health workers in a disease- and product-specific step by step process through the clinical workflow of CAR and BiTE therapy (Fig.1). This includes recommendations for eligibility, patient screening, safety assessment and stopping rules prior to leukapheresis and CAR T-cell transfusion. Upon entering relevant clinical data for grading of CRS, ICANS and HLH, interactive tools display toxicity grade and grade-specific management (Fig. 2). Further, "myTcell" assists with the diagnosis and treatment of pancytopenia and infections. The app includes an overview of important publications with direct links to respective abstracts to support evidence-based decision-making. A prototype was validated at five Geman treatment centers through a questionnaire which measured the advantage of the app compared to common clinical practice. 38 physicians with a median working experience of 8 years validated the app protoype in a real-world setting of CAR T-cells or BiTE application for the treatment of Diffuse Large-B-Cell Lymphoma (89.5%) and B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (39.5%) at five German treatment centers (University Hospitals of LMU Munich, Cologne, Göttingen, Erlangen, Tübingen). 78.9% of the users most valued the content of toxicity management. In addition, 63.2% reported to dominantly use the interactive tools and calculators to assess severity of toxicities and to instantly receive grade-specific management recommendations. As expected, the tools were most frequently used for the two most commonly occurring side effects CRS (68.4%) and ICANS (65.8%). In addition, most of the users agreed, that the interactive tools improved toxicity management (94.7%) and saved time during their clinical practice (81.6%). Based on these results, "myTcell" has been certified as a medicinal product class I and has been released in the app stores and for desktop application (www.mytcell.de) on July 15, 2021. "myTcell" is a smartphone app supporting the use of T-cell based immunotherapy platforms. The app supports assessment and treatment of novel CAR T and BITE mediated immunotoxicities. Health care professionals validated feasibility and in particular appreciated fast and easy assessment of toxicity grading and management. Thus, "myTcell" is a tool that has the potential to improve guideline adherence and accelerate broader and safer application of CARs and BiTEs based immunotherapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Blumenberg: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding. Schmidt: Bayer Healthcare: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; BMS: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. von Bergwelt: Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Mologen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MSD Sharpe & Dohme: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Buecklein: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Congress and travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: congress and travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Subklewe: Janssen: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Research Funding; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Klinikum der Universität München: Current Employment; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MorphoSys: Research Funding.

scholarly journals CD22-Directed CAR T-Cell Therapy Mediates Durable Complete Responses in Adults with Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma after Failure of CD19-Directed CAR T-Cell Therapy and High Response Rates in Adults with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 28-29
Author(s):  
John H. Baird ◽  
Matthew J. Frank ◽  
Juliana Craig ◽  
Shabnum Patel ◽  
Jay Y. Spiegel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Private Company ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Support Research

BACKGROUND: CD22 is expressed on the majority of B-cell malignancies. Autologous CAR T-cells targeting CD22 (CAR22) have yielded objective response rates (ORR) of 70-90% in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), including those who had previously failed CD19-directed CAR T-cell (CAR19) therapy. Based on these encouraging results, we evaluated CAR22 in adult patients with R/R ALL and for the first time in patients with R/R large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), including those who had failed prior autologous CAR19 therapy. METHODS: This single-institution phase I dose escalation clinical trial (NCT04088890) is evaluating a CAR construct incorporating the m971 CD22 single chain variable fragments and 41BB/CD3z endodomains integrated within autologous T-cells via lentiviral transduction. After lymphodepletion with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, patients were infused with fresh or cryopreserved CAR T-cells after a 7- to 11-day closed manufacturing process utilizing the CliniMACS Prodigy device (Miltenyi). The current cohort includes patients treated at dose level 1 (DL1), which was 1x106 CAR+ cells/kg. Primary objectives assessed the ability to successfully manufacture CAR22 and safety. Overall response rate (ORR) at 28 days post-infusion (D28) was a secondary objective. RESULTS: Three patients with LBCL have been enrolled with a median age of 53 years (range, 51-57) and a median of 6 (range, 5-8) prior lines of therapy. All three patients received prior CAR19 and had refractory disease to second-line or later therapy (n=3); had not undergone autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) (n=3); had MYC and BCL2 gene rearrangements (double-hit lymphoma; n=2); had high tumor burden (SPD >50 cm2; n=2); had a history of primary refractory disease (n=1); or had never achieved CR to any therapy (n=1). Six patients with ALL have been enrolled with a median age of 43.5 years (range, 23-62) and a median of 6 (range, 4-8) prior lines of therapy. All six patients received prior allogeneic HSCT and had Ph-positive disease (n=3); had central nervous system (CNS) involvement (n=3); had extramedullary disease (n=2); had high disease burden (BM blasts >5%; n=2); had received prior CD19-directed therapy (n=5); or had received prior CD22-directed therapy (n=3). Successful manufacturing of cells at DL1 was achieved in all patients. All patients (LBCL n=3, ALL n=6) reached day 28 and are included in the safety and response analysis presented here; updated results will be presented at the meeting. Eight patients (88.9%) experienced cytokine release syndrome (CRS); all were Grade 1-2. There were no cases of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). No differences in toxicities were seen across the patient age spectrum and no Grade 5 toxicities occurred following CAR22 infusion. In LBCL, all patients achieved a response at D28 (ORR=100%; CR, n=1, PR, n=2). Both patients with a D28 PR improved to CR by day 90 and 180. All patients remain in CR, with a median follow-up of 8.4 months (range, 6-9.3). In ALL, all patients achieved a CR at D28 (ORR=100%; MRD-, n=5, MRD+, n=1). After a median follow up of 5.1 months (range, 1-8.2), three patients relapsed at 2.5, 4, and 5.5 months after infusion; one patient died while undergoing subsequent therapy 7.3 months post-infusion. CD22 expression by flow cytometry was downregulated or absent in two patients after relapse. Peak CAR expansion as detected by peripheral blood flow cytometry reached a median level of 90.1 (LBCL; range, 85.4-350) and 43.4 (ALL; range, 0.9-399.6) CAR+ cells/µL between D14 and D21. In two LBCL patients with progression following CAR19, CAR22 levels were 11.7 and 55.9 fold higher than prior CAR19 levels at peak expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Infusion of CD22-targeting CAR T-cells in R/R LBCL and ALL is safe and well tolerated. Manufacturing of CAR22 was uniformly successful. To date, 3 of 3 heavily treated adult patients with LBCL whose disease relapsed after prior CAR19 have each achieved CR durable to at least 6 months. All adult ALL patients have achieved CR following CAR22, with some early relapses observed. Accrual is ongoing. Disclosures Negrin: Amgen: Consultancy; Biosource: Current equity holder in private company; UpToDate: Honoraria; KUUR Therapeutics: Consultancy; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; BioEclipse Therapeutics: Current equity holder in private company. Rezvani:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Shiraz:ORCA BioSystems: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding. Sidana:Janssen: Consultancy. Mackall:BMS: Consultancy; Allogene: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Apricity Health: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company; Nektar Therapeutics: Consultancy; NeoImmune Tech: Consultancy; Lyell Immunopharma: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company. Miklos:Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotech: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Allogene Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Juno-Celgene-Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding. Muffly:Amgen: Consultancy; Adaptive: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: CD22-directed CAR T-cell Therapy for the treatment of adults with relapsed/refractory LBCL and B-ALL

scholarly journals Bleeding and Thrombosis Are Associated with Endothelial Dysfunction in CAR-T Cell Therapy and Are Increased in Patients Experiencing Neurologic Toxicity

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 32-33
Author(s):  
Andrew Johnsrud ◽  
Juliana Craig ◽  
John H. Baird ◽  
Jay Y. Spiegel ◽  
Lori S. Muffly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Private Company ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Thrombotic Complications ◽  
D Dimer ◽  
Support Research

Background Treatment with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have shown dramatic, often durable responses for relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. However, it can be associated with significant side effects such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector-cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and life-threatening consumptive coagulopathies. The underlying pathobiology of such hemostatic defects and their distinct clinical sequelae remains obscure. This retrospective study aims at quantifying CAR T therapy associated bleeding and thrombotic complications and their association with CRS, ICANS, and laboratory derangements. Methods 130 adult patients with DLBCL or B-ALL treated between 2017-2020 with CD19 CAR-T therapy axicabtagene ciloleucel (N=90) or a bispecific CD 19/22 CAR construct utilizing 4-1BB costimulatory domains (N=40) were analyzed to determine dynamics of coagulation parameters and platelet counts as well as incidences of bleeding or thrombosis in the first three months after CAR T infusion. Events were included if graded ≥ 2 or if intervention was required. Platelet counts and coagulation parameters were collected prior to lymphodepletion (pre-LD), day 0, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 60 and 90. Results 12 (9.2%) and 8 (6.2%) patients developed bleeding and thrombotic complications in the first three months after CAR-T infusion, respectively. Events are characterized in Figure 1. All bleeding events occurred between days 0-30 (median 17.5, range 8-30), while thrombotic events occurred between days 2-91 (median day 29, range, 2-91). Two (1.5%) patients experienced both bleeding and thrombosis. Bleeding events coincided with the onset of thrombocytopenia and hypofibrinogenemia, and patients who bled had lower platelet (median 22.5 vs. 47 K/uL; p=0.03) and fibrinogen (median 151 vs. 351 ug/mL; p=0.007) nadirs in the first 30 days compared to those without bleeding. Temporally, the lowest median platelet nadir occurred at day 7 in patients with bleeding events vs. day 21 in patients without bleeding, while timing of fibrinogen nadirs were at day 21 in both. Patients with bleeding episodes were more likely to be older (median age: 70 vs. 60 yrs, p=0.03), have thrombocytopenia prior to lymphodepletion therapy (median 117.5 vs. 174.5 K/uL, p=0.01), and have elevated LDH (lymphoma subgroup; p=0.07). Other lab derangements in the first 30 days seen more frequently in patients with bleeding included prolonged thrombin time (TT) (21% vs. 6%; p=0.02), PT (16% vs. 5%; p=0.06), and elevated d-dimer (16% vs. 3%; p=0.01) indicative of a consumptive process. Thrombotic events were not significantly associated with elevated or peak d-dimer values (median 4.97 vs. 2.37 ug/mL, p=0.20). Interestingly, occurrence or severity of CRS was not associated with bleeding or thrombotic events, nor was it associated with marked derangements in coagulation abnormalities. However, higher grade ICANS (grade > 3) was associated with bleeding (42% vs. 15%; p=0.038), thrombosis (50% vs. 16%; p=0.03), and evidence of endothelial activation including PT prolongation (78% vs. 35%; p<0.001), hypofibrinogenemia (57% vs. 20%; p=0.001), and trend towards elevated d-dimer (70% vs. 46%; p=0.06). 13 (10%) patients received anticoagulation for prophylaxis or therapeutic indications that predated CAR T infusion. Four started anticoagulation secondarily for thrombotic events after CAR-T infusion, and one received tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) for an acute stroke. In this group, no patients developed bleeding complications from anticoagulation. Conclusion Both bleeding (9.2%), and thrombotic (6.2%) events are observed after CAR T cell therapy, with bleeding limited to the first month in our cohort. Notably, ICANS was uniquely associated with PT prolongation, hypofibrinogenemia, and increased fibrin degradation, in addition to both bleeding and thrombosis. These results suggest that a systemic coagulopathy coincides with high grade ICANS and whether these neurologic events truly represent sequelae of widespread vascular dysfunction warrants further investigation. Anticoagulation was safe in the patients whom it was indicated. Risk factors for bleeding and thrombotic complications should be studied prospectively to develop risk-assessment models and clinical guidelines for management of bleeding and thrombosis (including prophylaxis) during CAR T therapy. Disclosures Muffly: Adaptive: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy. Negrin:BioEclipse Therapeutics: Current equity holder in private company; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; KUUR Therapeutics: Consultancy; Biosource: Current equity holder in private company; Amgen: Consultancy; UpToDate: Honoraria. Shizuru:Jasper Therapeutics, Inc: Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Meyer:Orca Bio: Research Funding. Shiraz:Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding; ORCA BioSystems: Research Funding. Rezvani:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Mackall:Apricity Health: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company; NeoImmune Tech: Consultancy; Nektar Therapeutics: Consultancy; Allogene: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; BMS: Consultancy; Lyell Immunopharma: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company. Miklos:Adaptive Biotech: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Juno-Celgene-Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Allogene Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding. Sidana:Janssen: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Profiling T-Cell Receptor Diversity and Dynamics during Lymphoma Immunotherapy Using Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 49-50
Author(s):  
Navika D Shukla ◽  
Alexander F. M. Craig ◽  
Brian Sworder ◽  
David M. Kurtz ◽  
Charles Macaulay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Tcr Repertoire ◽  
Support Research

Background: Characterization of T-cell receptor (TCR) diversity and dynamics is increasingly critical to understanding therapeutic immune responses targeting tumors. Current TCR profiling methods generally require invasive tissue biopsies that capture a single snapshot of immune activity or are limited by the sheer diversity of the circulating TCR repertoire. In theory, T-cells with the greatest turnover could best reflect pivotal immune dynamics from both circulating and tissue-derived compartments, including non-circulating tissue-resident memory T-cells (Trm). To noninvasively capture such responses in the blood, we developed and benchmarked a high-throughput TCR profiling approach using plasma, optimized for the fragmented nature of cfDNA and the non-templated nature of rearranged TCRs. We then applied this method for residual disease monitoring in mature T-cell lymphomas (TCL) without circulating disease and for characterizing immune dynamics after anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR19) T-cell therapy of B-cell lymphomas with axicabtagene ciloleucel. Methods: We developed SABER (Sequence Affinity capture & analysis By Enumeration of cell-free Receptors) as a technique for TCR enrichment and analysis of fragmented rearrangements shed in cfDNA and applied this method using Cancer Personalized Profiling by Deep Sequencing (CAPP-Seq). We used SABER to profile a total of 381 samples (300 cfDNA and 81 PBMC samples) from 75 lymphoma patients and 18 healthy controls. After mapping sequencing reads (hg38) to identify candidate rearrangements within TCR loci, unique cfDNA fragments were resolved by a novel strategy to define consensus of unique molecular identifiers clustered by Levenshtein distances, followed by CDR3-anchoring for enumeration of final receptor clonotypes. SABER thus leverages information from fragmented TCRs, a critical requirement for cfDNA, to make V gene, CDR3, and J gene assignments after deduplication-mediated error-correction. We benchmarked SABER against established amplicon-based TCR-β targeted sequencing (LymphoTrack, Invivoscribe) and repertoire analysis methods (MiXCR; Bolotin et al, 2015 Nature Methods) when considering both cfDNA and PBMC samples from healthy adults and TCL patients. We assessed SABER performance for tracking clonal molecular disease in patients with mature TCLs from both cellular and cell-free circulating compartments (n=9). Malignant TCL clonotypes were identified in tumor specimens using clonoSEQ (Adaptive Biotechnologies). Finally, we evaluated TCR repertoire dynamics over time in 66 DLBCL patients after CAR19 T-cell therapy. Results: SABER demonstrated superior recovery of TCR clonotypes from cfDNA compared to both amplicon sequencing (LymphoTrack, Invivoscribe) and hybrid-capture methods when enumerating receptors using MiXCR (Fig. 1A). When applied to blood samples from TCL patients, SABER identified the malignant clonal TCR-β rearrangement in 8/9 (88.9%) cases, with significantly improved detection in cfDNA (p=0.015, Fig. 1B). Specifically, tumoral TCR clonotype was detectable only in cfDNA in 6 cases (75%), cfDNA-enriched in 1 case (12.5%), and detectable only in PBMCs in 1 case (12.5%). We applied SABER to monitor TCR repertoire dynamics in cfDNA after CAR T-cell therapy of patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL and observed increased T-cell turnover and repertoire expansion (greater total TCR-β clonotypes) (Fig. 1C). As early as 1-week after CAR19 infusion, TCR repertoire size was significantly correlated both with cellular CAR19 T-cell levels by flow cytometry (p=0.008) as well as with retroviral CAR19 levels in cfDNA (p=2.20e-07) suggesting faithful monitoring of CAR T-cell activity (Fig. 1D). TCR repertoire size one month after infusion was significantly associated with longer progression-free survival (HR 0.246, 95% CI 0.080-0.754, p=0.014). Conclusions: SABER has a favorable profile for cfDNA TCR repertoire capture when compared to existing methods and could thus have potential broad applicability to diverse disease contexts. Given the higher abundance of lymphoma-derived TCRs in cfDNA than intact circulating leukocytes, SABER holds promise for monitoring minimal residual disease in T-cell lymphomas. This approach also holds promise for monitoring T-cell repertoire changes including after CAR T-cell therapy and for predicting therapeutic responses. Disclosures Kurtz: Genentech: Consultancy; Foresight Diagnostics: Other: Ownership; Roche: Consultancy. Kim:Corvus: Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Elorac: Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; Galderma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Horizon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin Pharma: Research Funding; Medivir: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Research Funding; miRagen: Research Funding; Neumedicine: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Solingenix: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding. Mackall:Lyell Immunopharma: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company; BMS: Consultancy; Allogene: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Apricity Health: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company; Nektar Therapeutics: Consultancy; NeoImmune Tech: Consultancy. Miklos:Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotech: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Juno-Celgene-Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Allogene Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding. Diehn:Varian Medical Systems: Research Funding; Illumina: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; RefleXion: Consultancy; BioNTech: Consultancy. Khodadoust:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy. Alizadeh:Janssen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Chugai: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Iomab with Adoptive Cellular Therapy (Iomab-ACT): A Pilot Study of 131-I Apamistamab Followed By CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4810-4810
Author(s):  
Mark B. Geyer ◽  
Briana Cadzin ◽  
Elizabeth Halton ◽  
Peter Kane ◽  
Brigitte Senechal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

Abstract Background: Autologous CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-modified (CAR) T-cell therapy leads to complete responses (CR) in patients (pts) with (w/) relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL, >80% CR rate) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, ~40-55% CR rate). However, following fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (Flu/Cy) conditioning and CAR T-cell therapy w/ a CD28 costimulatory domain (e.g. 19-28z CAR T-cells), rates of grade ≥3 ICANS and grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in pts w/ R/R DLBCL and morphologic R/R B-ALL exceed 30%. CRS and ICANS are associated w/ considerable morbidity, including increased length of hospitalization, and may be fatal. Host monocytes appear to be the major reservoir of cytokines driving CRS and ICANS post-CAR T-cell therapy (Giavradis et al. and Norelli et al., Nature Medicine, 2018). Circulating monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) may also blunt efficacy of 19-28z CAR T-cells in R/R DLBCL (Jain et al., Blood, 2021). The CD45-targeted antibody radioconjugate (ARC) 131-I apamistamab is being investigated at myeloablative doses as conditioning prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation in pts w/ R/R acute myeloid leukemia. However, even at low doses (4-20 mCi), transient lymphocyte and blast reduction are observed. Preclinical studies in C57BL/6 mice demonstrate low-dose anti CD45 radioimmunotherapy (100 microCi) transiently depletes >90% lymphocytes, including CD4/CD8 T-cells, B-cells, NK cells, and T-regs, as well as splenocytes and MDSCs, w/ negligible effect on bone marrow (BM) hematopoietic stem cells (Dawicki et al., Oncotarget, 2020). We hypothesized a higher, yet nonmyeloablative dose of 131-I apamistamab may achieve more sustained, but reversible depletion of lymphocytes and other CD45 + immune cells, including monocytes thought to drive CRS/ICANS. We additionally hypothesized this approach (vs Flu/Cy) prior to CAR T-cell therapy would promote CAR T-cell expansion while reducing CSF levels of monocyte-derived cytokines (e.g. IL-1, IL-6, and IL-10), thus lowering the risk of severe ICANS (Fig 1A). Study design and methods: We are conducting a single-institution pilot study of 131-I apamistamab in lieu of Flu/Cy prior to 19-28z CAR T-cells in adults w/ R/R BALL or DLBCL (NCT04512716; Iomab-ACT); accrual is ongoing. Pts are eligible for leukapheresis if they are ≥18 years-old w/ R/R DLBCL (de novo or transformed) following ≥2 chemoimmunotherapy regimens w/ ≥1 FDG-avid measurable lesion or B-ALL following ≥1 line of multi-agent chemotherapy (R/R following induction/consolidation; prior 2 nd/3 rd gen TKI required for pts w/ Ph+ ALL) w/ ≥5% BM involvement and/or FDG-avid extramedullary disease, ECOG performance status 0-2, and w/ appropriate organ function. Active or prior CNS disease is not exclusionary. Pts previously treated w/ CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy are eligible as long as CD19 expression is retained. See Fig 1B/C: Post-leukapheresis, 19-28z CAR T-cells are manufactured as previously described (Park et al., NEJM, 2018). Bridging therapy is permitted at investigator discretion. Thyroid blocking is started ≥48h pre-ARC. 131-I apamistamab 75 mCi is administered 5-7 days pre-CAR T-cell infusion to achieve total absorbed marrow dose ~200 cGy w/ remaining absorbed dose <25 cGy at time of T-cell infusion. 19-28z CAR T-cells are administered as a single infusion (1x10 6/kg, B-ALL pts; 2x10 6/kg, DLBCL pts). The primary objective is to determine safety/tolerability of 131-I apamistamab 75 mCi given prior to 19-28z CAR T-cells in pts w/ R/R B-ALL/DLBCL. Secondary objectives include determining incidence/severity of ICANS and CRS, anti-tumor efficacy, and 19-28z CAR T-cell expansion/persistence. Key exploratory objectives include describing the cellular microenvironment following ARC and 19-28z CAR T-cell infusion using spectral cytometry, as well as cytokine levels in peripheral blood and CRS. The trial utilizes a 3+3 design in a single cohort. If dose-limiting toxicity (severe infusion-related reactions, treatment-resistant severe CRS/ICANS, persistent regimen-related cytopenias, among others defined in protocol) is seen in 0-1 of the first 3 pts treated, then up to 6 total (up to 3 additional) pts will be treated. We have designed this study to provide preliminary data to support further investigation of CD45-targeted ARCs prior to adoptive cellular therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Geyer: Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Geoghegan: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment. Reddy: Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Berger: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment. Ludwig: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment. Pandit-Taskar: Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Clarity Pharma: Research Funding; Illumina: Consultancy, Honoraria; ImaginAb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ymabs: Research Funding; Progenics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Medimmune/Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding. Sauter: Genmab: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: 131-I apamistamab and 19-28z CAR T-cells are investigational agents in treatment of ALL and DLBCL

scholarly journals A Phase 1 Study with Point-of-Care Manufacturing of Dual Targeted, Tandem Anti-CD19, Anti-CD20 Chimeric Antigen Receptor Modified T (CAR-T) Cells for Relapsed, Refractory, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4193-4193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirav N Shah ◽  
Fenlu Zhu ◽  
Carolyn Taylor ◽  
Dina Schneider ◽  
Winfried Krueger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: CAR-T cell therapy directed against the CD19 antigen is a breakthrough treatment for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell NHL. Despite impressive outcomes, not all pts respond and many that respond still relapse. Affordability and accessibility are further considerations that limit current commercial models of CAR-T products. Commercial CAR-T manufacturing is complex, time consuming, and expensive with a supply chain starting at the treating center with apheresis of mononuclear cells, cryopreservation, and shipping to and from a centralized third-party manufacturing site. We addressed these limitations in a Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating a first-in-human bispecific tandem CAR-T cell directed against both CD19 and CD20 (CAR-20.19-T) antigens for pts with R/R B-cell NHL. Through dual targeting we hope to improve response rates and durability of response while limiting antigen escape. We eliminated third party shipping logistics utilizing the CliniMACS Prodigy, a compact tabletop device that allows for automated manufacturing of CAR-T cells within a GMP compliant environment within the hospital. Most materials and reagents used to produce the CAR-T cell product were single-sourced from the device manufacturer. Methods: Phase 1 (NCT03019055), single center, dose escalation + expansion study to demonstrate feasibility and safety of locally manufactured second generation 41BB + CD3z CAR-20.19-T cells via the CliniMACS Prodigy. Feasibility was measured by ability to generate a target CAR-20.19-T cell dose for a minimum of 75% of subjects. Safety was assessed by the presence of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) through 28 days post-infusion. Dose was escalated in a 3+3 fashion with a starting dose of 2.5 x 10^5 cells/kg, a target DLT rate <33%, and a goal treatment dose of 2.5 x 10^6 cells/kg. Adults with R/R Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), Follicular Lymphoma (FL), Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) or Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) were eligible. CAR-T production was set for a 14-day manufacturing process. Day 8 in-process testing was performed to ensure quality and suitability of CAR-T cells for a potential fresh infusion. On Day 10, pts eligible for a fresh CAR-T infusion initiated lymphodepletion (LDP) chemotherapy with fludarabine 30 mg/m2 x 3 days and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 x 1 day, and cells were administered after harvest on Day 14. Pts ineligible for fresh infusion received cryopreserved product and LDP was delayed accordingly. Results: 6 pts have been enrolled and treated with CAR-20.19-T cells: 3 pts at 2.5 x 10^5 cells/kg and 3 pts at 7.5 x 10^5 cells/kg. Median age was 53 years (48-62). Underlying disease was MCL in 3 pts, DLBCL in 2 pts, and CLL in 1 patient. Baseline data and prior treatments are listed in Table 1. CAR-T production was successful in all runs and all pts received their target dose. Three pts received fresh CAR-T cells and 3 pts received CAR-T cells after cryopreservation. To date there are no DLTs to report. No cases of Grade 3/4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or neurotoxicity (NTX) were observed. One patient had Grade 2 CRS and Grade 2 NTX requiring intervention. The other had self-limited Grade 1 CRS and Grade 1 NTX. Median time to development of CRS was Day +11 post-infusion. All pts had neutrophil recovery (ANC>0.5 K/µL) by Day 28. Response at Day 28 (Table 2) is as follows: 2/6 pts achieved a complete response (CR), 2/6 achieved a partial response (PR), and 2/6 had progressive disease (PD). One subject with a PR subsequently progressed at Day 90. The 3 pts who did progress all underwent a repeat biopsy, and all retained either CD19 or CD20 positivity. Pts are currently being enrolled at the target dose (2.5 x 10^6 cells/kg) and updated results will be provided at ASH. Conclusions: Dual targeted anti-CD19 and anti-CD20 CAR-T cells were successfully produced for all pts demonstrating the feasibility of a point-of-care manufacturing process via the CliniMACS Prodigy device. With no DLTs or Grade 3-4 CRS or NTX to report, and 2/6 heavily pre-treated pts remaining in CR at 3 and 9 months respectively our approach represents a feasible and promising alternative to existing CAR-T models and costs. Down-regulation of both target antigens was not identified in any patient following CAR-T infusion, and in-process studies suggest that a shorter manufacturing timeline is appropriate for future trials (10 days). Disclosures Shah: Juno Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Lentigen Technology: Research Funding; Oncosec: Equity Ownership; Miltenyi: Other: Travel funding, Research Funding; Geron: Equity Ownership; Exelexis: Equity Ownership. Zhu:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Research Funding. Schneider:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Krueger:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Worden:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Hamadani:Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; MedImmune: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellerant: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Ostuka: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Johnson:Miltenyi: Research Funding. Dropulic:Lentigen, A Miltenyi Biotec company: Employment. Orentas:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Other: Prior Employment. Hari:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase 1 Study of CD19/CD22 Bispecific Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) Therapy in Children and Young Adults with B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 898-898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liora M Schultz ◽  
Kara L. Davis ◽  
Christina Baggott ◽  
Christie Chaudry ◽  
Anne Cunniffe Marcy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Peak Car

Abstract Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) therapy targeting CD19 achieves complete remission (CR) rates of 70%-90% in relapsed/refractory B-ALL. Relapse due to loss of the CD19 targeted epitope presents a therapeutic challenge as evidenced by the largest global pediatric CD19-CAR experience which showed 15 of 16 relapses to be explained by CD19 downregulation (Maude et al, NEJM 2018). Alternatively targeting CD22 using CD22-CAR therapy has demonstrated a CR rate of approximately 70% in both CD19+ and CD19- B-ALL, however relapse due to CD22 downregulation limits the curative potential of singularly-targeting CD22 (Fry et al, Nat Med. 2018). We hypothesized that simultaneous targeting of CD19 and CD22 via a bispecific CAR-T cell would be a safe and tolerable treatment strategy in relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL and address immune evasion. Here, we report the first clinical experience in pediatric patients using bispecific CD19-CD22 CAR T cells. We describe a single institution phase I dose escalation study in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory B cell ALL. We utilized lentiviral transduction of a bivalent CAR construct incorporating the fmc63 CD19 and m971 CD22 single chain variable fragments (scFvs) used in clinically tested CAR constructs and a 41BB costimulatory endodomain (Fry et al, Nat Med. 2018). Our primary objectives are feasibility of production of this bivalent CAR and safety at 3 dose escalation levels (1x106, 3x106 and 1x107 CAR T cells/kg). Clinical response assessment is evaluated as a secondary aim. All patients described received lymphodepletion with fludarabine (25mg/m2 x 3 days) and cyclophosphamide (900mg/m2 x 1) followed by fresh or cryopreserved CAR T cell infusion after a 7-9 day production time. Patients were prospectively monitored at predefined intervals for disease response and correlative assessments. Four pediatric patients with precursor-B ALL, age 2-17, have been enrolled and treated with CD19/CD22 bispecific CAR T cells at dose level 1 (1x106) [Table 1]. Three patients entered CAR therapy with low disease burden detected by minimal residual disease (MRD) alone and 1 patient initiated therapy with 12% bone marrow blasts. All patients were CNS1 at time of treatment. The toxicity profile mirrored that of the singular CD19 and CD22 CAR experience with 3 patients experiencing reversible CRS (2 Grade I, 1 Grade II), onset day 3-8, and 2 patients experiencing grade I neurotoxicity, onset day 3-9. In our cohort, we experienced lower grade toxicities than previously reported, likely due to a mean lower disease burden. Only 1 patient with CRS met criteria for tocilizumab and this patient was the singular study patient treated with higher burden disease. Neurotoxicity was managed with supportive care and fully reversible. Peripheral blood flow cytometry analysis detects circulating CAR by day 6 in all patients and demonstrates peak CAR expansion between day 6-10. Peak CAR T expansion reached levels of 10-25% of total T cells with inter-patient variability in CD4 and CD8 predominance, favoring CD8 expansion in 3 of 4 patients. Clinical symptoms and inflammatory markers expectedly correlate with peak CAR expansion. Four of 4 patients achieved complete remission (CR) at day 28 post-CD19/CD22 bispecific CAR therapy. Three of 4 patients demonstrated MRD- remissions by flow cytometry and of these, next generation sequencing (NGS) was negative where available (N=2). Multi-parametric CyTOF studies permitting CAR T cell phenotyping in conjunction with single cell TCR tracking, proteomics, epigenomics and cytokine profiling are ongoing and will be used to further characterize persisting CAR T cells and define inter-product and inter-patient variability. In this phase I study, we demonstrate safety and tolerability of this bispecific CD19/CD22 CAR at a dose of 1x106 CAR T cells/kg in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B cell ALL. The CD19/22-bispecific CAR mediated antileukemic activity in 100% of patients studied thus far. Long-term follow up and further accrual will be required to inform the effect of bispecific CAR targeting on surface antigen remodeling. Disclosures Muffly: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Shire Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Miklos:Genentech: Research Funding; Kite - Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics - Abbot: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Primary Progression on Frontline Therapy for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Is Associated with a Poor Outcome Despite Subsequent CD19 Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3855-3855
Author(s):  
Ariel Perez Perez ◽  
Grace Johnson ◽  
Kedar Patel ◽  
Brian Arciola ◽  
Anthony Wood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T ◽  
Scientific Advisory ◽  
Advisory Role

Abstract Introduction: Between 50-80% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are cured by frontline (1L) R-CHOP immunochemotherapy. Ultra-high risk (UHR) features for poor overall survival (OS) include: progression through the frontline therapy (primary progression, PP), presence of a MYC translocation (MYC-R+), and a high or high-intermediate National Comprehensive Cancer Network International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) (Costa, Am. J. Hematol., 2017). We aim to explore the role of these UHR factors in the outcomes of DLBCL patients receiving standard of care (SOC) anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. Methods: This is a retrospective single-center study of relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL patients treated with either axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) as SOC at Moffitt Cancer Center according to the FDA label as of March 2021, or who were treated on the expanded access programs (EAP) for axi-cel (NCT03153462) and tisa-cel (NCT03601442) for the provision of CAR T when products fell outside of manufacturing specifications (OOS). We excluded patients who had received prior therapy for indolent B-cell lymphomas (iNHL). We defined patients with primary treatment failure (PTF) as: PP, residual disease after 1L therapy (RD), or early relapse within 6 months of 1L therapy (ER). For patients with PTF, we calculated the number of UHR features (0 to 3): MYC status, NCCN-IPI, and PP. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) starting from the date of CAR T-cell infusion, with statistical significance determined using the log-rank test at the P&lt;0.05 threshold. Results: A total of 187 R/R DLBCL patients received SOC or EAP CAR T-cell therapy, of which 116 had DLBCL with no prior therapy for iNHL and were included in this analysis. PTF occurred in 75 patients (65%), of which 30 (40%) patients had primary progression as the failure pattern, 23 (30.7%) patients had MYC-R detected by FISH, and 37 (49.3%) patients had intermediate-high/high NCCN-IPI scores at the time of PTF. The median follow up was 10.05 months. Of the 75 patients with PTF, 69 received axi-cel and 6 received tisa-cel. Main 1L therapies were R-CHOP in 59 (78.6%) cases and DA-EPOCH-R in 14 (18.7%). The median lines of therapy prior to CAR T-cell therapy was 3 (range 2-6 lines). The number of UHR features was associated with a shorter OS after CAR T-cell therapy. The OS for patients with 2-3 and 0-1 UHR were 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 15.13 months) and not reached, respectively (P=0.005; Figure 1A). In terms of PTF patterns, PP was associated with worse PFS and OS after CAR T-cell therapy compared to other patterns (RD/ER) (PP, mPFS 3.1 months vs RD/ER, mPFS not reached; p&lt;0.001; PP, median OS 5.63 months vs RD/ER, mOS not reached, P&lt;0.001; Figure 1B). Patients with PTF and MYC-R+ had no difference in PFS (P=0.51) but a shorter OS after CAR T-cell therapy compared to those without an identified MYC translocation (P=0.05). Patients with intermediate-high or high NCCN-IPI at time of PTF had similar PFS (P=0.75) and OS (P=0.34) to patients with intermediate-low or low NCCN-IPI. Conclusion: Patients with DLBCL who experience PP to frontline immunochemotherapy had shorter PFS and OS after subsequent CAR T-cell therapy compared to other PTF patterns. R/R DLBCL patients with PP represent a poor prognosis subgroup, even with CAR T-cell therapy. It will be important to determine if patients with primary progression have increased benefit from CAR T-cell therapy if it is provided at first relapse rather than after 2 or more prior lines of therapy. Our study suggests that mechanisms of tumor resistance to CAR T-cell therapy may be present in some patients from the time of upfront therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Chavez: AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Merk: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Speakers Bureau; MorphoSys, Bayer, Karyopharm, Kite, a Gilead Company, Novartis, Janssen, AbbVie, TeneoBio, and Pfizer: Consultancy; MorphoSys, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Genentech, Kite, a Gilead Company, and Epizyme: Speakers Bureau. Shah: Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Incyte: Research Funding; Acrotech/Spectrum: Honoraria; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Expenses, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Expenses; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Servier Genetics: Other; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy. Nishihori: Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Lazaryan: Kadmon: Consultancy; Avrobio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Humanigen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Davila: Precigen: Research Funding. Locke: Wugen: Consultancy, Other; Umoja: Consultancy, Other; Cowen: Consultancy; EcoR1: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Other; Novartis: Consultancy, Other, Research Funding; Legend Biotech: Consultancy, Other; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role, Research Funding; Iovance Biotherapeutics: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; GammaDelta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Cellular Biomedicine Group: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Calibr: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Allogene Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role, Research Funding; Emerging Therapy Solutions: Consultancy; Gerson Lehrman Group: Consultancy; Moffitt Cancer Center: Patents & Royalties: field of cellular immunotherapy. Gaballa: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Epizyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG therapeutics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy. Jain: Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals CD19-Directed CAR T-Cell (CTL019) Product Viability and Clinical Outcomes in Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas and B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 197-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elise A. Chong ◽  
Bruce L Levine ◽  
Stephan A. Grupp ◽  
Megan Davis ◽  
Don L. Siegel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Release Test ◽  
Car T

Abstract Introduction: CTL019 is an anti-CD19 genetically modified autologous T-cell immunotherapy developed at the University of Pennsylvania (Penn) that was recently approved for treatment of relapsed/refractory pediatric and young adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and adult relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) as tisagenlecleucel (Novartis). For ALL, the FDA-approved dose is 0.2 to 5.0 x 106 CAR-positive viable T cells per kg of body weight for patients ≤ 50 kg or 0.1 to 2.5 x 108 CAR-positive viable T cells for pts > 50 kg; for DLBCL, the FDA-approved dose is 0.6 to 6.0 x 108 CAR-positive viable T cells. For CTL019 manufactured at Penn, the dose is determined by flow cytometric staining of CAR-positive T cells, which are cryopreserved in product bags along with replicate aliquots of the final formulation in vials, simultaneously cryopreserved for release testing. The CTL019 product release criteria include a post thaw viability assessment using a vial of replicate aliquot of the final formulation for Trypan blue exclusion or dual fluorescence automated cell counting (Luna-FL, Logos Biosystems). There are no published data examining the relationship between CTL019 viability release testing and clinical outcomes. Methods: We analyzed CTL019 post thaw viability release testing in patients treated on one prospective single institution clinical trial of CD19-expressing non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) (NCT02030834) and two single-institution prospective pediatric ALL clinical trials (NCT01626495 and NCT02906371). Patients were assessed for response to therapy and CAR T-cell expansion. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for prediction of complete responses based on sensitivity and specificity of CAR T-cell product post thaw viability release test results. Results: 39 pts with relapsed/refractory NHL (24 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and 15 follicular lymphoma) were enrolled and received the protocol-specified dose of CTL019. Best response rate was 56% (22/39) complete responses (CR). 123 pts with relapsed/refractory pediatric ALL were enrolled and received the protocol-specified dose of CTL019. Best response rate was 96% (118/123) CR/complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi). For patients with NHL infused with CTL019, product % viability had a median of 89.8% viability (range: 73.7%-97.7%); product % viability quintiles were as follows: 20%-tile=81.7%, 40%-tile=88.3%, 60%-tile=91.1%, 80%-tile=94.8%). ROC area for NHL patients was 0.47 (95%CI: 0.28-0.65). For patients with ALL infused with CTL019, product % viability had a median of 89.3% viability (range: 56.0%-98.4%); product % viability quintiles were as follows: 20%-tile=82.3%, 40%-tile=87.5%, 60%-tile=90.9%, 80%-tile=94.4%). ROC area for ALL patients was 0.52 (95%CI: 0.32-0.71). For patients with NHL, progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly influenced by product viability release test results by Cox proportional hazards (HR: 1.0, 95%CI: 0.94-1.09, p=0.7). For patients with NHL, peak CAR T-cell expansion was not significantly correlated with product viability release test results (r2=0.12, p=0.5). Data collection for Cox analysis to investigate the effect of release test viability on PFS and correlation of release test viability with peak CTL019 expansion in ALL is ongoing and will be presented. Conclusions: Our data suggest that, within the ranges obtained in these trials, there is no clear dose-response relationship between CTL019 product viability release test results and clinical response rates in pediatric and young adult ALL or DLBCL. Figure Figure. Disclosures Chong: Novartis: Consultancy. Levine:Cure Genetics: Consultancy; Brammer Bio: Consultancy; CRC Oncology: Consultancy; Incysus: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Tmunity Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Grupp:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptimmune: Consultancy; University of Pennsylvania: Patents & Royalties; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Davis:Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Inc.: Patents & Royalties. Siegel:Novartis: Research Funding. Maude:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Frey:Novartis: Consultancy; Servier Consultancy: Consultancy. Porter:Genentech: Other: Spouse employment; Novartis: Other: Advisory board, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board. June:Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tmunity Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Celldex: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tmunity Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Schuster:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Toxicity of JCAR014 in Combination with Durvalumab for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1680-1680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre V. Hirayama ◽  
Jordan Gauthier ◽  
Kevin A. Hay ◽  
Alyssa Sheih ◽  
Sindhu Cherian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Group 2

Abstract Introduction Autologous T cells engineered to express a CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) have shown high overall response rates (ORR) in otherwise treatment-refractory CD19+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL); however, not all patients (pts) achieve complete remission (CR). PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and/or other tissues could impair the function of PD-1+ CAR-T cells and the efficacy of CD19 CAR-T cell immunotherapy. PD-1 pathway blockade may enhance the function and antitumor activity of CD19 CAR-T cells. Here we report preliminary data from a phase 1 dose-finding study (NCT02706405) of the safety and feasibility of combination therapy with JCAR014 CD19-specific 4-1BB-costimulated CAR-T cells and escalating doses of durvalumab, an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, in adults with relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell NHL. Methods Pts are treated in one of two groups. All pts receive lymphodepletion chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine followed by infusion of JCAR014. Pts in group 1 receive the first infusion of durvalumab (225 mg, 750 mg, or 1500 mg) 21-28 days after treatment with JCAR014. Pts in group 2 receive the first dose of durvalumab (7.5 mg, 22.5 mg, 75 mg, 225 mg, 750 mg, or 1500 mg) 1 day prior to JCAR014 infusion. Up to 10 doses of durvalumab are administered after JCAR014 at the highest identified safe dose at 4-week intervals until toxicity or disease progression. We evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the combination therapy and the pharmacokinetic profile of JCAR014 after infusion. Adverse events were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03, with the exception of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which was graded according to consensus criteria (Lee, Blood 2014). Positron emission tomography/computed tomography was performed approximately 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12 months after JCAR014 infusion and the best anti-tumor response was reported according to the Lugano criteria (Cheson, JCO 2014). Results Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Fifteen pts have been treated, including 6 in group 1 who received post-JCAR014 durvalumab doses of 225 mg (n = 3) and 750 mg (n = 3), and 9 in group 2 who received pre-JCAR014 durvalumab doses of 7.5 mg (n = 1), 22.5 mg (n = 1), 75 mg (n = 3), or 225 mg (n = 4). Durvalumab dose escalation is ongoing. JCAR014 manufacturing was successful for all pts. All pts received 2 x 106 JCAR014 CAR-T cells/kg, except the first 2 pts treated on the study who received 7 x 105 CAR-T cells/kg. Of the 13 pts who received JCAR014 at 2 x 106 CAR-T cells/kg, 5 pts (38%) developed CRS (2 grade 1, 2 grade 2, and 1 grade 4) and one (8%) developed grade 1 neurotoxicity. CRS and/or neurotoxicity occurred within 4 weeks of JCAR014 infusion, and were not observed when durvalumab was administered after JCAR014. With the exception of B cell aplasia, no autoimmune adverse events were observed. Twelve of 13 pts who received 2 x 106 CAR-T cells/kg were evaluable for response. One patient, who had grade 4 CRS and biopsy evidence of extensive CAR-T cell infiltration into persistent sites of disease, elected to receive hospice care and died on day 32 after JCAR014 infusion without full response evaluation. The overall response rate was 50% (5 CR, 42%; 1 PR, 8%). Of the 5 pts who achieved CR, 3 were in CR at the first restaging after JCAR014 and 2 subsequently converted to CR after the first post-JCAR014 durvalumab infusion. Only one patient who achieved CR has relapsed (median follow-up 10.6 months, range 3.7-11.8). Continued stable disease or evidence of regression was seen in 4 of 6 (67%) initially non-responding pts who continued durvalumab therapy (median 5 doses, range 1-6). CAR-T cell counts expanded in the peripheral blood within 14 days of JCAR014 infusion in all pts. Higher peak and day 28 CAR-T cell copy numbers in blood by qPCR were observed in responding pts. CAR-T cells were detected for a median of 5.1 months (range, 1.7 to 9.1 months) in responding pts. In vivo re-accumulation of CAR-T cells after the first post-JCAR014 durvalumab dose was observed in the blood of two patients in group 2. Conclusion The combination of JCAR014 with durvalumab for the treatment of adult pts with aggressive B-cell NHL appears safe; however, dose escalation is ongoing. Complete responses were observed both at initial restaging after JCAR014 infusion, and also subsequently in pts continuing durvalumab therapy after initially failing to achieve CR. Disclosures Hirayama: DAVA Oncology: Honoraria. Hay:DAVA Oncology: Honoraria. Till:Mustang Bio: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Kiem:Homology Medicine: Consultancy; Magenta: Consultancy; Rocket Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Shadman:Verastem: Consultancy; Beigene: Research Funding; Mustang Biopharma: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Qilu Puget Sound Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding. Cassaday:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Other: Spouse Employment, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Acharya:Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Teva: Honoraria. Riddell:Cell Medica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; NOHLA: Consultancy. Maloney:Roche/Genentech: Honoraria; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen Scientific Affairs: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria. Turtle:Precision Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Nektar Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eureka Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics / Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Caribou Biosciences: Consultancy; Aptevo: Consultancy.

Efficacy of Humanized CD19-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-Modified T Cells in Children and Young Adults with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 217-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon L Maude ◽  
David M. Barrett ◽  
Susan R. Rheingold ◽  
Richard Aplenc ◽  
David T Teachey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Children And Young Adults

Abstract Background Targeted immunotherapy with CTL019, CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells, can produce potent and sustained responses in children with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, a subset of patients has limited persistence, which can increase the risk of relapse. Most CAR single chain variable fragment (scFv) domains, including that of CTL019, are of murine origin; therefore, anti-mouse reactivity is one potential cause of immune-mediated rejection that may be overcome by fully human or humanized CAR designs. We developed a humanized anti-CD19 scFv domain and now report on treatment with humanized CD19-directed CAR T cells (CTL119). Design A pilot/phase 1 study of CAR-modified T cells containing a humanized anti-CD19 scFv domain (CTL119) enrolled children and young adults with relapsed/refractory B-ALL with or without prior exposure to a CAR T cell product. Patients previously treated with CD19-specific CAR-modified T cells were eligible if they met 1 of 3 criteria: 1) CD19+ relapse 2) no response to prior CAR T cell therapy or 3) early B cell recovery indicating poor persistence of CAR T cells. Patient-derived T cells were transduced ex vivo with a lentiviral vector encoding a CAR composed of CD3z, 4-1BB, and humanized anti-CD19 scFv domains and activated/expanded with anti-CD3/CD28 beads. The humanized scFv domain was developed by grafting the complementary determining regions of both the heavy and light chains onto human germline acceptor frameworks. Patients received lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine 1 week prior to infusion with CTL119. Results Thirty children and young adults aged 29 mo-24 yr were infused with CTL119. Eighteen patients had received prior allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT). Eleven patients who previously received murine-derived CD19-specific CAR-modified T cells (CTL019, n=7; other, n=4) were retreated for B cell recovery (n=5), CD19+ relapse (n=5), or no response to prior CAR T cells (n=1). CNS disease or other extramedullary disease was the indication for enrollment in 6 and 3 patients, respectively. At assessment 1 month after infusion, 26/30 patients (87%) achieved a complete response (CR), defined as morphologic remission with B cell aplasia. Of 11 patients previously treated with murine CD19-specific CAR-modified T cells, 7 (64%) achieved a CR at 1 month, 4 demonstrated no response. Multiparameter flow cytometry for minimal residual disease (MRD) was negative at a detection level of 0.01% in 5/7 responding patients. Two responding patients with positive MRD progressed to CD19+ relapse at 1.6 and 3 mo. In patients with no prior exposure to a CD19 CAR T cell product, MRD-negative CR was achieved in 19/19 patients (100%). One patient relapsed with CD19+ extramedullary disease at 2.8 mo. With a median follow-up of 4.2 mo (range, 1.0-14.1 mo) for all responding patients in both cohorts, 23/26 remain in remission with 1 proceeding to SCT in remission. B cell aplasia, a functional marker of CD19-targeted CAR T cell persistence, continued for 3 months or more in 11/18 patients with adequate follow-up: 1/6 retreatment, 10/12 CAR-naïve. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed in 28/30 patients and mild in most patients (grade 1, n=6; grade 2, n=18). Three patients experienced grade 3 CRS requiring supplemental oxygen or low-dose vasopressor support and 1 experienced grade 4 CRS requiring high-dose vasopressor and ventilatory support. Severe CRS was successfully managed with the IL6R antagonist tocilizumab in 3 patients. Neurologic toxicity included encephalopathy (n=5) and seizure (n=4) and was fully reversible. Conclusion In the first study of humanized anti-CD19 CAR T cells, CTL119 induced remissions in children and young adults with relapsed/refractory B-ALL, including 64% of patients previously treated with murine CD19-directed CAR T cells and 100% of CAR-naïve patients. Further investigation into CAR T cell persistence and anti-CAR responses will be vital to improve durable remission rates in this highly refractory population. Disclosures Maude: Novartis: Consultancy. Barrett:Novartis: Research Funding. Teachey:Novartis: Research Funding. Shaw:Novartis: Research Funding; Vitality Institute: Research Funding. Brogdon:Novartis: Employment. Scholler:Novartis: Patents & Royalties: Royalties, Research Funding. Marcucci:Novartis: Research Funding. Levine:GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences: Consultancy; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Frey:Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Porter:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Genentech: Employment. Lacey:Novartis: Research Funding. Melenhorst:Novartis: Research Funding. June:Novartis: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Celldex: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Honoraria; Immune Design: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Tmunity Therapeutics: Equity Ownership. Grupp:Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document