Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance and COVID-19: Results from the Population-Based Iceland Screens Treats or Prevents Multiple Myeloma Study (iStopMM)

Abstract Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) patients have an increased risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) when infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) precedes MM and related disorders and affects 4.2% of the general population over the age of 50 years. MM and MGUS are associated with immune dysfunction that is believed to contribute to the development of severe COVID-19. Currently, no systematic data on MGUS and COVID-19 have been published. We conducted a large population-based cohort study to evaluate whether MGUS was associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and the development of severe COVID-19. Methods Data on all SARS-CoV-2 test results and COVID-19 severity was acquired from the COVID-19 Outpatient Clinic at Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland. The first case of COVID-19 in Iceland was diagnosed on February 28 th, 2020. Since then, the Icelandic authorities have followed an aggressive strategy of SARS-CoV-2 testing and contact tracing. All SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals were immediately contacted and those with active infection were enrolled into telehealth monitoring consisting of repeated standardized interviews conducted by a nurse or physician. If clinical deterioration was detected, patients were assessed in person at the COVID-19 Outpatient Clinic and admitted if needed. Study participants were included from the Iceland Screens Treats or Prevents Multiple Myeloma study (iStopMM). The study is an ongoing population-based screening study for MGUS and randomized trial of follow-up strategies. Out of the 148,708 Icelanders who were born 1976 and earlier and were alive on September 9 th 2016, 80,759 (54%) provided informed consent for study participation and 75,422 (94%) of those provided a blood sample for MGUS screening by serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and free light chain (FLC) assay. MGUS was determined by current criteria using SPEP and FLC assay data. Individuals who had died, been diagnosed with MM and related disorders, or were undergoing treatment for smoldering MM prior to February 28 th were excluded. First, the association of MGUS and testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated. We used a test negative design and included participants who had been tested at least once for SARS-CoV-2 between February 28 th and December 31 st, 2020. The association of MGUS and a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 was assessed using logistic regression, adjusted for sex and age. Next, the association of MGUS and severe COVID-19 was evaluated. Those who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were included unless they were hospitalized or living in a nursing home at diagnosis. Participants were followed until discharge from telehealth monitoring or until considered having severe COVID-19. Severe COVID-19 was defined as the composite outcome of the need for outpatient visit or hospital admission and death and as the composite outcome of hospital admission and death. Logistic regression was then performed adjusting for sex and age. Results Of the 75,422 individuals screened for MGUS, 32,047 (42%) were tested for SARS-CoV-2 during the study period of whom 1,754 had MGUS (5.5%). Those with MGUS were older (mean age 66.3 vs 59.1 p<0.001) and more likely to be male (50% vs 41% p<0.001). In total, 1,100 (3.4%) of the participants tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 of whom 65 had MGUS. After adjusting for sex and age, MGUS was not found to be associated with testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 (odds ratio (OR): 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81-1.36; p=0.72; Table; Figure A). Of those who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, a total of 230 had the composite outcome of requiring an outpatient visit or hospital admission, and death, and 117 had the composite outcome of hospital admission and death. After adjusting for age and sex, MGUS was not found to be associated with either endpoint (OR: 0.99; 95%CI: 0.52-1.91; p=0.99 and OR: 1.13; 95%CI: 0.52-2.46; p=0.76; Table; Figure B) Conclusions: In this large population-based study that included 75,422 individuals screened for MGUS, we did not find MGUS to be associated with SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility or COVID-19 severity. This is contrary to MM which is preceded by MGUS. These findings suggest that immunosuppression in MGUS differs significantly from that of MM and are important since they can inform management and recommendations for individuals with MGUS. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kampanis: The Binding Site: Current Employment. Hultcrantz: Intellisphere LLC: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Curio Science LLC: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Durie: Amgen, Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: fees from non-CME/CE services . Harding: The Binding Site: Current Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Landgren: Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Other: IDMC; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Other: IDMC; Amgen: Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria. Kristinsson: Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Peripheral Neuropathy Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Fractures in Individuals with Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance: A Population-Based Study Including 15,351 MGUS Cases

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-116740 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1914-1914

Author(s):

Sæmundur Rögnvaldsson ◽

Sigrun Thorsteinsdottir ◽

Ingemar Turesson ◽

Magnus Björkholm ◽

Ola Landgren ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Monoclonal Gammopathy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Large Population ◽

Population Based ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Population Based Study ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Swedish Patient

Abstract Introduction: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significane (MGUS) is the precursor of multiple myeloma (MM) and related disorders. MGUS is relatively common in the general population with a reported prevalence of 4.2% over the age of 50. Although MGUS is usually considered asymptomatic, affected individuals have been shown to have an increased risk of fractures. This is believed to be related to an early form of MM bone disease characterized by abnormal bone architecture. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) has also been shown to be associated with MGUS. Currently, the prevalence of PN in MGUS is unclear, with reports ranging from 3 to 70%. PN has been associated with an increased risk of falls and fractures, especially in diabetic neuropathy, the most common type of PN. However, we are not aware of any studies assessing how PN affects fracture risk in individuals with MGUS. Therefore, we were motivated to create a large population-based study to assess how PN affects the risk of fractures in MGUS. Methods: We included all MGUS cases diagnosed in Sweden between 1986 and 2013 and recorded in a registry of a nationwide network of hematology- and oncology centers or in the Swedish patient registry. We then cross-linked data from the Swedish Patient Registry, Cancer Registry, and Cause of Death Registry to our study cohort. Individuals with a previous history of other lymphoproliferative disorders were excluded from the study. We created a multi-state survival model. At inclusion participants started providing person time into the PN or the non PN states depending on whether they had a previous diagnosis of PN or not. Those with MGUS who developed PN after inclusion were included into the PN state at the time of PN diagnosis and provided person time into the PN state after that. We then created a Cox proportional hazard regression model with the endpoint defined as the first fracture of any type after inclusion with participants being censored at diagnosis of MM or related disorders. We adjusted for sex, age, year of MGUS diagnosis and previous fracture in the 2 years before inclusion. Results At total of 15,351 individuals with MGUS were enrolled and followed for a median of 3.2 years, providing a total of 76,141 years of person time. Of those, 951 individuals provided a total of 3,497 years of person time with PN, being followed for a median of 2.7 years. A total of 3,121 fractures were observed, 2,970 among those without PN and 151 among those with PN. Results from an adjusted Cox regression model showed that those who had PN had a higher risk of having a first fracture than did those who did not have PN (hazard ratio (HR): 1.21, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1.02-1.42, p=0.027). Discussion In this large population-based study including 15,351 individuals with MGUS we found that individuals with MGUS who also have PN have an increased risk of fractures as compared to those who only have MGUS. In a previous study, we have already showed that PN does not affect the risk of MGUS progression. Therefore, it is unlikely that these findings are attributed to fractures caused by active undiagnosed MM. These findings suggest that the increased fracture risk observed in individuals with MGUS can at least partly be attributed to concomitant PN. We are currently validating these results within the iStopMM trial, a large prospective MGUS screening study. Disclosures Landgren: Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Peripheral Neuropathy in MGUS and Progression to Amyloid Light-Chain Amyloidosis: A Population-Based Study Including 15,351 MGUS Cases

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-131514 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5444-5444

Author(s):

Sæmundur Rögnvaldsson ◽

Ingemar Turesson ◽

Magnus Björkholm ◽

Ola Landgren ◽

Sigurður Yngvi Kristinsson

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Large Population ◽

Diagnostic Delay ◽

Population Based ◽

Lymphoproliferative Disorders ◽

First Year ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Population Based Study ◽

Increased Risk

Introduction Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a common disorder that can be caused by amyloid light-chain amyloidosis (AL). AL is a rare disorder caused by the deposition of amyloid fibers, originating from malignant plasma cells. Amyloid deposition in peripheral nerves causes PN and is present in 35% of patients with newly diagnosed AL. Diagnosis of AL can be difficult, leading to under-recognition, diagnostic delay, and delayed treatment. Virtually all instances of AL are preceded by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). MGUS is relatively common with a reported prevalence of 4.2% in the general Caucasian population over the age of 50 years. Although MGUS is usually considered asymptomatic, a significant proportion of affected individuals develop PN. However, we are not aware of any studies assessing how PN affects risk of MGUS progression to AL. We were therefore motivated to conduct a large population-based study including 15,351 Swedish individuals with MGUS diagnosed 1986-2013. Methods Participants diagnosed with MGUS between 1986-2013 were recruited from a registry of a nationwide network of hematology- and oncology centers and the Swedish Patient Registry. We then cross-linked data on recorded diagnoses of AL and PN from the Swedish Patient Registry, diagnoses of lymphoproliferative disorders form the Swedish Cancer Registry, and dates of death from the Cause of Death Registry to our study cohort. Individuals with a previous history of other lymphoproliferative disorders were excluded from the study. A multi-state survival model was created. At inclusion, participants started providing person time into the PN or the non-PN states depending on whether they had a previous diagnosis of PN. Those with MGUS who developed PN after inclusion were included into the PN state at the time of PN diagnosis and provided person time in the PN state after that. We then created a Cox proportional hazard regression model with AL as the endpoint. Participants were censored at diagnosis of other lymphoproliferative disorders. We adjusted for sex, age, and year of MGUS diagnosis. Results We included 15,351 participants with MGUS. Of those, 996 participants provided person-time with PN (6.5%). About half of those had PN at MGUS diagnosis (55%). A total of 174 cases of AL were recorded, with AL being more common among those who had PN (2.1% vs 1.0% p=0.002). Those who had PN had a 2.3-fold increased risk of AL as compared to those who did not have PN (hazard ratio (HR): 2.3; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.5-3.7; p<0.001). The results were similar for those who had PN at MGUS diagnosis and those who did not. More than half of AL cases (53%) were diagnosed within one year after MGUS diagnosis. The rate was even higher among those with PN, with 82% of AL cases among those who presented with PN being diagnosed within one year after MGUS diagnosis. In the first year after inclusion, the incidence of AL was 15.2 and 6.1 per 1000 person-years for participants with and without PN respectively (HR: 1.8; 95% CI:1.0-3.4; p=0.04). Participants with PN continued to have an increased risk of progression to AL after the first year with an incidence of AL of 2.6 per 1000 person-years as compared to 1.1 per 1000 person-years among participants who did not have PN (HR:2.4; 95% CI: 1.1-5.0; p=0.02) (Figure). Discussion In this large population-based study, including 15,351 individuals with MGUS, we found that individuals with MGUS who develop PN have an increased risk of progression to AL. In fact, individuals with MGUS who have PN at MGUS diagnosis might already have AL. This risk of AL was highest during the first year after MGUS diagnosis with participants with PN having a higher risk than those who did not have PN. PN continued to be associated with a higher risk of MGUS progression to AL throughout the study period. This is the largest study that we are aware of assessing the association of PN and MGUS progression to AL. Since this is a registry-based study based on recorded diagnoses, some clinical data, including MGUS isotype, is not available. These findings suggest that increased awareness of PN as a feature of MGUS might decrease diagnostic delay and improve outcomes for patients with AL. Figure Disclosures Landgren: Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Theradex: Other: IDMC; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Other: IDMC; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

The Impact of Fractures on Survival in Multiple Myeloma: Results from a Population-Based Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-115403 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4490-4490

Author(s):

Sigrun Thorsteinsdottir ◽

Ingigerdur S Sverrisdottir ◽

Gauti Gislason ◽

Ola Landgren ◽

Ingemar Turesson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Population Based ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Population Based Study ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

Increased Risk ◽

The Impact

Abstract Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) causes lytic bone lesions, osteopenia, and fractures, which increase the morbidity of MM patients. Results from small previous studies have indicated that fractures in MM have a negative effect on survival. Aims The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of fractures on survival in MM patients diagnosed in Sweden in the years 1990-2013. Furthermore, to analyze the effect of bone fractures at MM diagnosis on subsequent survival. Methods Patients diagnosed with MM in 1990-2013 were identified from the Swedish Cancer Registry. Information on date of birth, diagnosis, and death were collected from the Registry of Total Population. Information on all fractures were retrieved from the Swedish Patient Registry. Cox regression model was used with fractures as time-dependent variables. The effect of fractures on survival was assessed for any fracture or a subtype of fracture (a specific bone fracture or ICD-coded pathologic fracture). Either first fracture or the first subtype of fracture was used in the analysis. The effect of a fracture at MM diagnosis (within 30 days before or 30 days after MM diagnosis) on survival was also estimated using a Cox regression model. All models were adjusted for age, sex, time of diagnosis, and previous fractures. Results A total of 14,008 patients were diagnosed with MM in the study period. A total of 4,141 (29.6%) patients developed a fracture including fractures that occurred within a year before MM diagnosis and thereafter. Hereof 2,893 (20.7%) patients developed a fracture after MM diagnosis. The risk of death was significantly increased for patients that developed a fracture after the time of MM diagnosis with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.91-2.10) for all fractures combined. The risk of death was significantly increased for patients that developed all subtypes of fractures after MM diagnosis except ankle fractures. The risk of death was significantly increased for patients that developed pathologic fractures (HR=2.17; 95% CI 2.03-2.32), vertebral fractures (HR=1.73; 95% CI 1.61-1.87), hip fractures (HR=1.99; 95% CI 1.82-2.18), femoral fractures (HR=2.62; 95% CI 2.32-2.98), humerus fractures (HR=2.57; 95% CI 2.32-2.86), forearm fractures (HR=1.24; 95% CI 1.05-1.46), and rib fractures (HR=1.52; 95% CI 1.31-1.77), but not for ankle fractures (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.79-1.44). A total of 942 (6.7%) of all MM patients were diagnosed with a fracture within 30 days before or 30 days after MM diagnosis. The patients with a fracture at diagnosis were at a significantly increased risk of death compared to those without (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.21-1.41; Figure) Conclusions Our large population-based study, including over 14,000 patients diagnosed with MM in Sweden in the years 1990-2013, showed that MM patients that developed a fracture after the time of diagnosis were at twofold increased risk of dying compared to MM patients without a fracture. Furthermore, MM patients with a fracture at diagnosis had a 30% higher risk of dying compared to patients without a fracture. Our results indicate that fractures in MM reflect a more advanced disease at diagnosis and stress the importance of managing MM bone disease in all MM patients. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Landgren: Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Screening for Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance: A Population-Based Randomized Clinical Trial. First Results from the Iceland Screens, Treats, or Prevents Multiple Myeloma (iStopMM) Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152333 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 156-156

Author(s):

Sigurdur Y Kristinsson ◽

Sæmundur Rögnvaldsson ◽

Sigrun Thorsteinsdottir ◽

Elin Ruth Reed ◽

Jon Thorir Thorir Oskarsson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Binding Site ◽

Monoclonal Gammopathy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Population Based ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

M Proteins ◽

Screening Study

Abstract Background: Cancer screening is performed worldwide for several malignancies. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) precedes multiple myeloma (MM) and related lymphoproliferative disorders (LP). However, less than 5% of all MM patients are diagnosed during their precursor state and individuals who develop MM while being monitored for MGUS have better overall survival and fewer complications, compared to MM patients diagnosed without knowledge of MGUS. Thus, population-based screening for MGUS could identify candidates for early treatment of MM/LPs. To evaluate whether systematic screening is beneficial, we performed the Iceland Screens, Treats, or Prevents Multiple Myeloma (iStopMM) study, the first population-based screening study for MGUS that includes a randomized clinical trial (RCT) of follow-up and treatment strategies. Methods: All living residents of Iceland on September 9th, 2016 who were born before 1976 (N=148,708) were invited to participate. Of those, 80,759 (54.3%) provided informed consent for screening. Serum samples were collected from participants alongside clinical blood sampling in the Icelandic health service between September 2016 and the end of 2020. All samples were shipped to the Binding Site in Birmingham, UK, for screening. Samples were tested for M-proteins by capillary zone electrophoresis and immunofixation electrophoresis performed to confirm and characterize suspected M-proteins. Free light chains (FLCs) were measured using the FreeLite® assay. Individuals with a previous diagnosis of MM/LPs/MGUS (N=237) were excluded. Per protocol and informed consent, participants with MGUS were randomized to one of the three study arms: Arm 1 where participants are not contacted; Arm 2 where individuals are followed based on current guidelines; and Arm 3 where individuals are followed with a more intensive diagnostic and monitoring strategy. Participants who progress are offered early treatment. All participants repeatedly answered questionnaires on quality of life and mental health. Results: A total of 75,422 participants (93.4%) provided a serum sample for screening. Of those, 3,725 (4.9%) had MGUS. The prevalence of MGUS was dependent on age with 2.3%, 6.2%, and 12.9% diagnosed in age groups 40-59, 60-79, and 80-103 years, respectively. The prevalence of MGUS was higher in males, 5.9% vs 4.1% (p<0.0001). Most individuals with MGUS had either low-risk (38%) or low-intermediate (36%) risk MGUS, followed by high-intermediate (26%) risk MGUS. High-risk MGUS was only present in 0.2% of MGUS cases (n=9). The RCT includes 3,487 newly diagnosed MGUS individuals with 1164, 1159, and 1164 individuals in arms 1, 2 and 3, respectively (Table). The median age at diagnosis was 69 years in arms 1 and 2, and 70 years in arm 3. Females constituted 45.9% and the isotypes were IgG (50%), IgA (10%), IgM (18%) and biclonal (8%). The median M-protein concentration was 0.34 g/dL. A total of 428 light-chain MGUS cases were randomized. The demographic distribution was well balanced between the three arms. After a median follow-up of 3 years, 194 patients in the RCT have been diagnosed with any LP: 9 in arm 1, 92 in arm 2, and 133 in arm 3 (p<0.001). The participants in arm 1 were diagnosed with smoldering Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (SWM)(N=2), WM (N=2), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (N=1), and MM (N=4). Participants in arm 2 were diagnosed with amyloidosis (N=1), SWM (N=18), WM (N=2), CLL (N=2), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (N=1), smoldering MM (SMM) (N=56), and MM (N=12). Participants in arm 3 were diagnosed with amyloidosis (N=2), SWM (N=22), CLL (N=5), NHL (N=6), SMM (N=82), and MM (N=16). The difference between study arms was statistically significant for all LPs combined, and for SWM, SMM, and MM (Table). Conclusion: In this large prospective population-based screening study including >75,000 screened persons, we have identified 3,725 individuals with monoclonal gammopathy. In the RCT, after 3 years of follow-up, we show that active screening identifies significantly higher number of individuals with full-blown malignancy and smoldering disease, illustrating the fact that early detection and intervention is achievable. Although our findings are encouraging, until final results of the iStopMM study become available, including data on survival and quality of life, we advise against systematic MGUS screening in healthy individuals. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kristinsson: Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Kampanis: The Binding Site: Current Employment. Hultcrantz: Curio Science LLC: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Intellisphere LLC: Consultancy. Durie: Amgen: Other: fees from non-CME/CE services ; Amgen, Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Takeda: Consultancy. Harding: The Binding Site: Current Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Landgren: Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Janssen: Other: IDMC; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: IDMC; Amgen: Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

African-American Patients with Monoclonal Gammopathy Have a Reduced Risk of Transformation to Clinical Myeloma: Results of a Prospective Study SWOG S0120

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-119634 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1877-1877 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Madhav V Dhodapkar ◽

Rachael Sexton ◽

Antje Hoering ◽

Bart Barlogie ◽

Robert Z. Orlowski

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

African American ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Monoclonal Gammopathy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chromosome 1 ◽

Optimal Management ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Risk Of Progression ◽

The Impact

Abstract Introduction: Both multiple myeloma (MM) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) are associated with marked racial disparities; incidence of both MM and MGUS is increased nearly 3-fold in African American (AA) compared to Caucasian/European American (EA) cohorts. Current estimates of the risk of progression to clinical malignancy in MGUS and asymptomatic myeloma (AMM) are at 1% and 10% per year respectively, based on data from EA cohorts such as from the Olmstead county in Minnesota. Risk estimates from prospective studies in AA cohorts are urgently needed to guide optimal management of these patients. Methods: Between 2003 and 2011, 331 eligible patients with IgG/A monoclonal gammopathy were enrolled in a prospective observational trial (SWOG S0120). All patients underwent uniform staging evaluation at baseline and follow up monitoring for progression to clinical myeloma (CMM). This analysis is focused on the impact of race on clinical and biologic features and risk of progression. Results: Of 331 eligible patients, 57 (17%) were of AA descent. Clinical features of the AA cohort were comparable to the non-AA counterparts, with the exception of higher proportion of females (61% versus 43%; p=0.01) and hemoglobin < 12 g/dl (37% versus 23%; p=0.04) in the AA cohort. Among 126 patients with available data on gene expression profile (GEP) of CD138-purified plasma cells, the proportion of patients with GEP-defined subsets was similar between AA and non-AA cohorts. The risk of transformation to clinical malignancy in AA patients was significantly lower than in non-AA cohort (2 year risk 5% vs 15%; 5 year risk 13% versus 24%; log rank p 0.04). Differences in risk were evident for both MGUS (2 year risk 0% versus 2 %) and AMM (2 year risk 13% versus 25%). The proportion of patients with high risk GEP signature (GEP-70 gene risk > -0.26) in purified tumor cells was markedly lower in the AA cohort (0% versus 33%, p=0.01). Unbiased analysis of which genes in the AA cohort predict risk of progression is ongoing. Conclusions: Together these data provide the first prospective evidence that AA patients with myeloma precursor states carry significantly lower risk of progression to CMM compared to non-AA counterparts. This may be explained in part by the finding that precursor lesions in AA patients have markedly lower proportion of genomic changes (such as GEP70-risk signature derived predominantly from chromosome 1) previously associated with higher risk of malignancy in EA cohorts. The mechanisms underlying the transformation to CMM may therefore differ between AA and EA cohorts, which in turn may impact optimal management of these patients. Disclosures Barlogie: Dana Farber Cancer Institute: Other: travel stipend; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; ComtecMed- World Congress on Controversies in Hematology: Other: travel stipend; European School of Haematology- International Conference on Multiple Myeloma: Other: travel stipend; International Workshop on Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: Other: travel stipend; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Myeloma Health, LLC: Patents & Royalties: : Co-inventor of patents and patent applications related to use of GEP in cancer medicine licensed to Myeloma Health, LLC; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Other: travel stipend. Orlowski:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BioTheryX, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Validation of a New Clinical Prediction Model for Outcome in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Not Eligible for Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation; A Population-Based Study from the Danish National Multiple Myeloma Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128074 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1849-1849

Author(s):

Louise Redder ◽

Tobias Wirenfeldt Klausen ◽

Annette Juul Vangsted ◽

Henrik Gregersen ◽

Niels Frost Andersen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Risk Groups ◽

Population Based ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Medium Risk ◽

The Uk

Background : The UK Myeloma Research Alliance recently introduced a new clinical prediction model for outcome in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients not eligible for autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) (Lancet Haematology 2019; 6: e154-66). The score or Myeloma Risk Profile, MRP, includes WHO performance status (PS), the International Staging System (ISS), age, and C-reactive protein (CRP) as prognostic variables. First a score is calculated by the formula: Score = (PS - 2) * 0.199 + (age - 74.4) * 0.0165 + (ISS - 2) * 0.212 + (log(CRP + 1) - 2.08) * 0.0315, where PS and ISS are defined as numbers between 0-4 and 1-3, respectively, and CRP is in mg/L. Next, three risk groups are defined as 1) low risk: score < -0.256, 2) medium risk: -0.256 ≤ score ≤ -0.0283, or 3) high risk: score > -0.0283. The MRP score was generated based on two prospective clinical trial cohorts, the NRCI-Myeloma XI study (ISRCTN49407852) as training set or internal validation, and the NRCI-Myeloma IX study (Blood 2011; 118, 1231-38) as test set or external validation. Both trials investigated conventional oral alkylating agents, cyclophosphamide or melphalan, in combination with thalidomide, lenalidomide, and/or bortezomib; thus including drugs typically used in treatment of elderly MM patients. Establishment of the model included 1852 patients in the training set, and 520 patients in the test set. All patients were recruited as part of clinical trials and therefore fulfilled defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. To validate the MRP score in a population-based setting we performed a study of the entire cohort of transplant ineligible MM patients in the Danish National MM Registry. Methods : The Danish MM registry started 01 January 2005. It includes registration of all diagnosed MM patients in Denmark and given first- and second-line treatment. A data validation study has been performed (J Clin Epidemiology, 2016; 8: 583-587). At 31 December 2014, 2,926 newly diagnosed treatment demanding MM patients were registered, hereof 1,803 patients were above 65 years and found ineligible for ASCT, and constituted the patient population for this study. Results: Of 1,803 transplant in-eligible but treatment demanding newly diagnosed MM patients above 65 years 426 patients had one or more missing values for calculation of the MRP score, most often this was caused by missing ISS. Thus, 1,377 patients were evaluable with a median follow-up of 40.9 months. Patients were treated according to standard of care in Denmark during the 10-years registration period which included upfront conventional alkylating agent, mostly melphalan in 37.7%, thalidomide-based in 25.6%, bortezomib-based in 26.1%, lenalidomide based in 2.7%, and only palliative, mostly steroid-based in 7.9%. The distribution of the risk groups according to MRP was as follows: low risk 28.5%, medium-risk 25.1%, and high-risk 46.4%. Ccompared to the UK datasets we had a higher proportion of high-risk patients which undoubtedly reflects that our cohort is population based. Median survivals for the 3 risk groups are presented in Table 1 and overall survival curves illustrated in Figure 1. The model performed well in separating the patients into subgroups with different survival risks. In conclusion, our real life population-based data confirm that the MRP score is a robust and valuable risk assessment tool for elderly newly diagnosed MM patients older than 65 and not eligible for ASCT. An important advantage of the MRP score is that it is calculated from simple parameters that should be part of everyday diagnostic work-up. Disclosures Vangsted: Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria; Jansen: Honoraria. Plesner:Takeda: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Frederiksen:Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Alexion: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Abildgaard:Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Outcomes and Clinical Features of Patients with 1q+ Multiple Myeloma Treated with Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112216 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3241-3241 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Timothy M. Schmidt ◽

Nisha Joseph ◽

Levani Odikadze ◽

Leonard Heffner ◽

Craig C Hofmeister ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

High Risk ◽

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Large Population ◽

Chromosome 1 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Introduction: Recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities have been well described in multiple myeloma and have important roles in the development and progression of myeloma, as well as prognostic implications for patient survival. Amplification of chromosome 1 (+1q) has been associated with inferior outcomes including survival. However, it is unclear whether this association is due to a primary effect of +1q on myeloma biology or secondary to its association with genomic instability and more advanced disease. Furthermore, the prognostic implication of +1q has yet to be determined in the setting of novel treatment regimens including triplet induction regimens incorporating an immunomodulatory agent and proteasome inhibitor backbone, with consideration of risk-adapted maintenance therapy. This study investigated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of a large population of multiple myeloma patients with +1q who were treated with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD) induction therapy. Methods: We collected data for 1000 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who received RVD induction and were seen at Emory University/Winship Cancer Institute between July 1, 2005 and August 31, 2016. Baseline characteristics were determined, including age, sex, race, laboratory values at diagnosis (hemoglobin, creatinine, calcium, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, beta-2-microglobulin, isotype, paraprotein, and serum free light chains) and molecular cytogenetics by fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for +1q, t(11;14), t(4;14), t(14;16), del(17p), del(13q), and hyperdiploidy. Patients were also categorized by their ISS stage, high-risk cytogenetics (defined as t(4;14), t(14;16), or del(17p)), and whether they were treated with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The primary outcomes were response to RVD induction by IMWG criteria (complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), and partial response (PR)), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of patients with +1q compared to patients without +1q. Hazard ratios and p-values for PFS and OS were calculated using multivariate analysis accounting for presence of ISS stage 3 disease, t(4;14), t(14;16), and del(17p). Results: Of 1000 total myeloma patients treated with RVD induction, 146 (14.6%) were noted to have +1q by FISH. Patients with +1q, compared to those without +1q, were more likely to be Caucasian (75.2% vs 60.1%, p=0.001) , have IgA isotype (29.8% vs 18.6%, p=0.049) , present with calcium > 10.5 (22.8% vs 14.3%, p=0.026) , and have concurrent high-risk abnormalities by FISH (59.6% vs 21.7%, p<0.001) . There was no significant difference in response to RVD induction, with responses of ≥CR/≥ VGPR /≥PR of 42.2%/67.2%/99.3% for patients with +1q compared with 36.1%/68.8%/97.8% for patients without +1q (p=0.693) . Median PFS was significantly shorter for patients with +1q compared with those without +1q (41.8 months vs 86.0 months , respectively, HR 2.39, p<0.001 ). OS of patients with +1q was significantly worse than patients without +1q (median not reached, HR 2.316, p=0.001 ). Conclusion: In this retrospective, single-center analysis of multiple myeloma patients treated with RVD induction, patients with 1q amplification had similar responses to induction therapy, but significantly inferior PFS and OS compared to patients without +1q. Further investigation is required to determine if the timing of 1q gain, copy number of chromosome amplification, and/or association with other high-risk cytogenetics are important contributing factors to the prognosis of patients with +1q. Disclosures Heffner: ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Hofmeister:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Boise:AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy. Lonial:Amgen: Research Funding. Nooka:Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive technologies: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kaufman:Karyopharm: Other: data monitoring committee; Janssen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

A Prospective Study and Identification of Genomewide Association Markers of Familial Predisposition to Plasma Cell Dyscrasias

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-137337 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 8-8

Author(s):

Adam S Sperling ◽

Rebecca Georgakopoulou ◽

Mehmet Kemal Samur ◽

Christine Ivy Liacos ◽

Brittany E Sandoval ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Genetic Analysis ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Plasma Cell ◽

Monoclonal Gammopathy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Familial Predisposition ◽

Plasma Cell Dyscrasias ◽

Second Degree

Introduction: An increased inherited risk for the development of plasma cell dyscrasias (PCDs) has long been suspected, however to date, only a limited number of potential genomic risk loci have been described. To characterize the inherited risk and facilitate identification of additional risk loci it is important to combine detailed pedigrees with extensive genetic analysis. To identify familial PCDs we initiated a prospective study with active recruitment of a large cohort of patients with PCDs and active screening of their relatives combined with tissue banking and subsequent genetic analysis. Methods: All patients in the Department of Clinical Therapeutics diagnosed with PCDs between January 2017 and January 2019, were offered enrollment in the study. Following informed consent, 1st and 2nd degree relatives over the age of 30 were eligible for screening. A detailed family pedigree was created for each index case with special focus on family history of PCDs, B-cell lymphomas, or other hematologic or solid malignancies. As a control, subjects' spouses were also screened. Screening included serum protein electrophoresis with immunofixation. In families where an additional member was identified with a PCD or B-cell malignancy, peripheral blood was collected from consenting family members over the age of 18 for further genetic analysis. Samples from affected individuals were profiled using whole genome sequencing (WGS) and unaffected individuals were genotyped using Axiom Arrays. Data were analyzed using Axion Array Suite and plink and GATK toolkit with BWA. Results: Of 1,084 patients screened for participation in the study; 752 had multiple myeloma (MM), 77 had smoldering MM, 81 a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, 93 Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia and 81 had AL amyloidosis. 176 (16.2%) patients refused to participate in the study, while 44 (4.1%) patients were ineligible for further screening due to the absence of a living first- or second-degree relative. The median number of screened first or second-degree relatives per index patient was 3 (range 1 to 10). The median age of index cases was 65 years, offspring was 37 years, second-degree relatives was 65 years, and spouses was 65 years. The incidence of a PCD among second-degree relatives was 4.5%, while it was 0.6% among offspring. As a control group, the incidence of PCDs among spouses was 2.6%. Overall at least one additional member (beyond the index patient) with a monoclonal gammopathy was detected in 98 families (11.3%). In 57 families (6.6%) there was a positive history of at least one additional first- or second-degree relative with a PCD or B-cell malignancy. In addition, 41 new cases of monoclonal gammopathy (4.7%) were identified through the screening process associated with this study. To identify genetic loci that could be associated with a predisposition to development of PCDs, genetic analysis was performed on the most heavily affected 18 families, those with at least three affected members or with early onset disease (i.e. PCD diagnosed before age 50). We have evaluated 838,750 SNPs from 103 samples from 18 families. 30 samples were from affected members and 73 from unaffected members. We found eight SNPs (rs13233413, rs11648113, rs59444635, rs148480125, rs113556240, rs11547122, rs671880, rs4726610) that are significantly enriched in affected members with a p-value below the suggestive cut-off of <1e-5. The top candidate was in the untranslated region (UTR) of TSPAN33, a marker of activated and malignant B-cells. We did not detect any significant enrichment in germline mutations in previously reported genes associated with familial PCD risk such as KDM1a, KRAS or DIS3. Functional annotation of the 8 SNPs identified here showed that rs148480125, located in the promoter region of the apoptosis regulator SIVA1, is predicted to impact the allele specific expression level. Further validation work is ongoing. Conclusions: Our active prospective screening approach to identify familial predisposition to PCDs revealed that 11.3% of patients had families with at least one additional affected member and some families had a substantially higher incidence of PCDs with earlier onset. Study of these high-risk families have identified genomewide association markers which in future may help us define familial predisposition to plasma cell dyscrasias. Disclosures Gavriatopoulou: Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Terpos:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis pharma SA: Honoraria, Other: travel expenses , Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: travel expenses , Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Kastritis:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Munshi:Janssen: Consultancy; OncoPep: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; BMS: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; C4: Current equity holder in private company; Adaptive: Consultancy. Dimopoulos:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

VTE Rates and Safety Analysis of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (KRD) with or without Rivaroxaban Prophylaxis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124403 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1835-1835 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Katrina M Piedra ◽

Hani Hassoun ◽

Larry W. Buie ◽

Sean M. Devlin ◽

Jessica Flynn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

High Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cancer Trial ◽

Oncology Research ◽

Increased Risk

Introduction Immunomodulatory agents (IMiD's) are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly when combined with high dose steroids. Studies evaluating the use of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVD) and carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRD) in the frontline setting for multiple myeloma (MM) have reported a 6% and 24% incidence of thrombosis, respectively, despite primary thrombotic prophylaxis with aspirin (ASA) (Richardson, et al. Blood. 2010; Korde, et al. JAMA Oncol 2015). Recent data, including the Hokusai VTE Cancer Trial, have suggested that safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preserved in the setting of treatment of solid malignancy-associated thrombosis (Raskob, et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; Mantha, et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017). Despite this data, there is limited experience and use of DOACs in prevention of thromboses in the setting of hematologic malignancies, specifically MM. After careful review of literature, since early 2018, we changed our clinical practice and routinely placed newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients receiving KRD at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) on concomitant rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily, regardless of VTE risk stratification. In the following abstract, we present VTE rates and safety data for newly diagnosed MM patients receiving RVD with ASA vs. KRD with ASA vs. KRD with rivaroxaban prophylaxis. Methods This was an IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective chart review study. All untreated patients with newly diagnosed MM, receiving at least one cycle of RVD or KRD between January 2015 and October 2018 were included. The period of observation included the time between the first day of therapy until 90 days after completion of induction therapy. Patients were identified by querying the pharmacy database for carfilzomib or bortezomib administration and outpatient medication review of thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban or ASA. VTE diagnoses were confirmed by ICD-10 codes and appropriate imaging studies (computed tomography and ultrasound). Descriptive statistics were performed. Results During the observation period, 241 patients were identified to have received RVD or KRD in the frontline (99 RVD with ASA; 97 KRD with ASA; 45 KRD with rivaroxaban). Baseline characteristics were well distributed among the three arms, with a median age of 60 (30-94) in the RVD ASA arm, 62 (33-77) in the KRD ASA arm, and 60 (24-79) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Patients had International Staging System (ISS) stage 3 disease in 13% (N=13), 9.3% (N=9), and 11% (N=5) of the RVD ASA, KRD ASA, and KRD rivaroxaban arms, respectively. Median weekly doses of dexamethasone were higher in both KRD arms, 40 mg (20-40) vs. 20 mg (10-40) in the RVD ASA arm. The average initial doses of lenalidomide were 22 mg in the RVD ASA arm compared to 25 mg in both the KRD ASA and KRD rivaroxaban arms. After querying the pharmacy database, no patients were identified to have a history or concomitant use of erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) use. Treatment-related VTE's occurred in 4 patients (4.0%) in the RVD ASA arm, 16 patients (16.5%) in the KRD ASA arm, and in 1 patient (2.2%) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Average time to VTE was 6.15 months (Range 5.42, 9.73) after treatment initiation in the RVD ASA group, while it was 2.61 months (Range 0.43, 5.06) in the KRD ASA group and 1.35 months in the KRD rivaroxaban group. Minor, grade 1 bleeding events per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) were identified in 1 (1.1%) patient in the RVD ASA arm, 5 (5.2%) patients in the KRD ASA arm, and 1 (2.2%) patient in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Conclusion More efficacious MM combination therapies have been found to increase the risk of VTE when using ASA prophylaxis, indicating better thromboprophylaxis is needed. We found patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with KRD were more likely to experience a VTE and these events occurred earlier compared to patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with RVD. Importantly, the rate of VTE was reduced to the same level as ASA prophylaxis with RVD when low-dose rivaroxaban 10 mg daily was used with KRD, and without necessarily increasing bleeding risk. Our retrospective data support the development of prospective clinical trials further investigating DOAC use in thromboprophylaxis for NDMM patients receiving carfilzomib-based treatments. Figure Disclosures Hassoun: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Lesokhin:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Genentech: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics and Precision Biosciences: Consultancy. Landgren:Theradex: Other: IDMC; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Other: IDMC; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Off-label use of rivaroxaban for outpatient prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) will be explicitly disclosed to the audience.

Download Full-text

Beta-Blockers Improved Survival Outcomes in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Evaluation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3306.3306 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3306-3306

Author(s):

Yi L. Hwa ◽

Qian Shi ◽

Shaji Kumar ◽

Martha Q. Lacy ◽

Morie A. Gertz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Mayo Clinic ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Beta Blockers ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

Cardiac Medication

Abstract Introduction: A recent study revealed an antiproliferative and apoptotic effect of propranolol on multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Our previous small matched case-control study showed longer survival in patients with propranolol and other beta-blockers (BB) intake than those without. This larger scale study was conducted to confirm the positive association of BB and MM survival. Methods: We identified 1971 newly diagnosed pts seen at Mayo Clinic between 1995 and 2010. Cardiac medication usage after diagnosis of MM was extracted from patient records and categorized based on BB intake. Cause of death was collected with death due to MM as the primary interest event and death due to cardiac disease or other reasons as competing risk events. The primary outcomes were MM disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). Cumulative incidence functions and Kaplan-Meier method were used to estimate the 5-year cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of MM death and OS rate, respectively. DSS and OS were compared by Gray's test and log-rank test, respectively. Multivarable Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the adjusted cause-specific HR (HRCSadj.) and hazard ratio (HRadj.) for DSS and OS, respectively, adjusting for demographics, disease characteristics, diagnosis year, and various chemotherapies. Results: 930 (47.2%) of MM patients had no intake of any cardiac medications; 260 (13.2%) had BB only; 343 (17.4%) used both BB / non-BB cardiac medications; and 438 patients (22.2%) had non-BB cardiac drugs. Five-year CIR of MM death and OS rate were shown in table. Superior MM DSS was observed for BB only users, compared to patients without any cardiac drugs (HRCSadj., .53, 95% confidence interval [CI], .42-.67, padj.<.0001) and non-BB cardiac drugs users (HRCSadj., .49, 95% CI, .38-.63, padj.<.0001). Patients received both BB and other cardiac drugs also showed superior MM DSS than non-cardiac drugs users (HRCSadj.., .54, 95% CI, .44-.67, padj.<.0001) and non-BB cardiac drug users. (HRCSadj., .50, 95% CI, .40-.62, padj.<.0001). MM DSS does not differ between BB users with and without other cardiac drugs (padj.=0.90). Multivariable analysis showed the same pattern for OS. None of the MM therapies impacted the differences in DSS and OS among BB intake groups (interaction padj.>.60). Conclusion: MM patients with BB intake showed reduced risk of death due to MM and overall mortality compared to patients who used non-BB cardiac or never used cardiac drugs. The result warrants further investigation for anti-cancer effect of BB in MM. Disclosures Shi: Mayo Clinic: Employment. Kumar:Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Skyline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Noxxon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Kesios: Consultancy. Gertz:NCI Frederick: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Med Learning Group: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Research to Practice: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Prothena Therapeutics: Research Funding; Ionis: Research Funding; Annexon Biosciences: Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Sandoz Inc: Honoraria. Kapoor:Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text