AMN107, Novel Aminopyrimidine Inhibitor of Bcr-Abl, Is Significantly More Potent Than Imatinib Mesylate Against Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cells.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2737-2737
Author(s):  
Mirna Golemovic ◽  
Miloslav Beran ◽  
Francis Giles ◽  
Taghi Manshouri ◽  
Deborah Thomas ◽  
...  

Abstract Imatinib mesylate is effective against Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) but, when used as a single agent, responses are transient and most patients relapse within 4–6 months. AMN107 is a novel oral aminopyrimidine ATP-competitive inhibitor of the protein tyrosine kinase activity of Bcr-Abl. Following oral administration to animals, AMN107 is well absorbed, has a good pharmacokinetic profile, and is well tolerated. The activity of AMN107, relative to imatinib, in both Ph-positive (Z-119 and Z-181) and Ph-negative (Z-138) ALL cell lines was studied. Z-119 and Z-181 cells were derived from Ph-positive ALL patients and retained typical B-cell characteristics and phenotypes of the original leukemia, including cytogenetic abnormality t(9;22) and p190 Bcr/Abl kinase. Z-138, a Ph-negative cell line, was derived from a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and supervening ALL. Treatment with AMN107 or imatinib for 3 days (MTS assay) inhibited proliferation of Z-119 cells with the IC50 values of 19.3 nM and 620.0 nM, respectively, revealing AMN107 to be 32 fold more potent than imatinib. Treatment of Z-181 cell line lasted for 4 days (MTS assay) because of lower growth rate of these cells: IC50 for AMN107 and imatinib were 1.6 nM and 63.9 nM, respectively, showing AMN107 to be 40 fold more potent than imatinib. Neither drug showed activity against Ph-negative Z-138 cells. We also compared the activity of AMN107 in Ph-positive ALL cell lines expressing p190 Bcr/Abl protein to that in Ph-positive chronic myeloid leukemia cell lines KBM5 and KBM7 expressing p210 Bcr/Abl protein. The activity was similar with IC50 in KBM5 cells of 11.3 nM and in KBM7 cells of 4.3 nM. In experiments focused on cell cycle analysis we found that at equipotent doses (as determined by MTS assay) both drugs induced cell accumulation in G0/G1 phase in Z-119 but not in Z-181. We demonstrated that increasing equipotent concentrations of AMN107 and imatinib induced activation of caspase-3 that resulted in apoptosis, as assessed by propidium iodide staining, in Z-119 cells, while Z-181 cells showed lack of apoptotic response. Following treatment with a broad range of AMN107 and imatinib doses for 3 hrs, Bcr/Abl expression and phosphorylation were determined in Z-119 cells by immunoprecipitation and Western blotting: Bcr/Abl phosphorylation was inhibited completely with AMN107 at 125.0 nM, and with imatinib at 2500 nM, confirming again the higher potency of AMN107. Finally, similar differential effect of AMN107 and imatinib on Bcr/Abl protein expression and phosphorylation was observed in leukemic cells obtained from blood of Ph-positive ALL patients. We conclude that AMN107 has significant activity against Ph-positive ALL cells and warrants investigation in patients with Ph-positive ALL.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 4552-4552
Author(s):  
Chiara Gregorj ◽  
Fabiana De Cave ◽  
Maria R. Ricciardi ◽  
Maria C. Scerpa ◽  
Cristina M. Precupanu ◽  
...  

Abstract Methylation of CpG islands in the 5′ gene region is associated with transcriptional silencing of gene expression. The hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes has been described in various tumor tissues, as in gastric and pancreatic cancer, as well as in acute myeloid leukemia, suggesting its potential role in tumorigenesis. Among the three members of the Kip/Cip family of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors (CKI) p21, p27 and p57, little is known of their methylation status in hematological malignancies and contrasting studies have been reported on the role of p21 hypermethylation in the pathogenesis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The aim of our study was to analyze in primary blasts from adult ALL enrolled in the GIMEMA protocols 0496 and LAL2000 the methylation status of p21, defining in addition its protein expression by Western blot using the monoclonal antibody p21-WAF1 (Santa Cruz, CA). Primary samples from 81 untreated ALL patients were processed using a widely accepted method based on bisulfite modification of DNA, followed by the use of methylation-specific PCR assay (MSP). The human lymphoblastic cell lines (Jurkat, RPMI8866 and CEM), the myeloid cell line OCI-AML3 and normal peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) from 10 healthy donors were characterized by a consistent p21 promoter unmethylation (negative controls). In contrast, it was weakly methylated in the Raji cell line and strongly methylated in the Rael (Burkitt’s lymphoma) cell line (positive controls). This assay was further validate in vitro by SsI methylase. In the present study we analyzed 54 B-lineage ALLs, 25 T-ALLs and 2 biphenothypic leukemias; the mean WBC value at diagnosis was 125.6x109/L and 20 samples were Philadelphia chromosome positive. 71/81 of patients studied for p21 methylation were evaluated for response: 53 (74.6%) achieved complete remission (CR) after induction therapy, 8 (11.3%) patients were resistance and 10 (14.1%) died during induction therapy. DNA methylation was not observed in any of the adult ALL patients. p21 protein expression was found in OCI-AML3, Raji and RPMI8866 cell lines, while resulted negative in the Jurkat cell line and in normal PBL. Preliminary results obtained in the ALL samples showed that this protein was expressed in 8/29 (27.6%) cases. In summary, we demonstrated in a large number of primary ALL cases studied at presentation that the p21 gene is not methylated in this population and therefore that the status of p21 methylation does not play a role in the pathogenesis of adult ALL.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2801-2801
Author(s):  
Stefanie V. Junk ◽  
Melchior Lauten ◽  
Gunnar Cario ◽  
Nicole Wittner ◽  
Martin Schrappe ◽  
...  

Abstract The response to initial glucocorticoid (gc) therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) reliably predicts the response to multiagent chemotherapy. In a recent study, we identified the valosin-containing protein (VCP) as a part of the ubiquitin proteasome degradation pathway (UPDP) as one of the proteins overexpressed in prednisone poor responder (PPR) patients. Therefore, we investigated whether treatment of ALL cell lines with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib acted synergistically with glucocorticoid treatment. Human B-cell precursor leukemic cell lines MHH cALL 2 (PPR) and MHH cALL 3 (PGR) were treated with prednisone(6.3μM) as baseline and also with different concentrations of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib for 96hours (h). To study drug effects, cells were sampled every 24h for immunofluorescence (IF) staining, protein and RNA extraction, viability (Trypan blue, WST-1) and apoptosis assays. Western blot analyses using an anti-p97 antibody were performed on whole cell lysates (wcl) and fractions and separated by differential detergent fractionation. VCP RNA expression was analyzed by real-time PCR. Single bortezomib treatment with 3nM or higher concentrations led to a significant decline in vitality of both cell lines. Within 24h, the PPR cell line lost about half and the PGR about one-fourth of their vitality. In combination with prednisone, 1.5nM bortezomib reduced the vitality by about 50% within 96h for both cell lines. Combining both drugs decreased the vitality rate by about 10% in the PPR cell line, whereas the PGR cells showed no decrease compared to single gc treatment. In FACS analyses, stages of different quantities of apoptosis were detected in PPR and PGR cells. PPR cells treated with both drugs showed a strong increase of necrotic cells at 24h. PGR cells started with an accession of apoptotic cells and initially had no necrotic cells, but started to rise from 48h on. We hence propose that the PPR cells react more quickly to the combined therapy. Under single gc treatment, VCP RNA expression increased in the PPR cells to a maximum of about 1.8- and in PGR cells to 1.5-fold. In PGR cells treated only with 1.5nM or 3nM bortezomib, VCP RNA rose to 1.4- and 2-fold respectively. Drug combination led to a 1.4-fold increase of VCP RNA in PPR compared to untreated cells, whereas RNA was reduced compared to single gc-treated cells. Protein levels of VCP in PPR cells remained high during drug treatment. VCP increased to a maximum of 1.6-fold in the cytosol of PGR cells, using bortezomib only. In the combination experiments, the amount doubled within 48h and thence decreased to initial levels. Single gc treatment caused a VCP increase to 1.5-fold within 24h. In the wcl, we found the VCP levels for the PGR cells converted to the cytosolic patterns. The results of IF staining supported the different VCP concentrations and exposed formation of aggresome-like complexes in the PPR cell line. The results of this study suggest that the multiagent chemotherapy resistance is indicated by differentially expressed VCP and related to the deregulation of the UPDP. Using inhibitors appears to chemisensitize the PPR for gc treatment. Therefore, drug targeting the proteasome, as in other hematological cancer therapies, might improve the overall therapy outcome.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3567-3567
Author(s):  
Yanis Boumber ◽  
Deborah A. Thomas ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Michael E. Rytting ◽  
Marian R Love ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3567 Background: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is an aggressive lymphoproliferative disorder, responsive to frontline standard induction and consolidation chemotherapy. However, the prognosis of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory ALL is extremely poor. Deregulation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signal transduction pathway is central to leukemic cell growth, proliferation and survival, and has been implicated in ALL pathogenesis. In a recent phase II study of pts with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, single agent mTOR inhibitor everolimus showed ORR 30% and acceptable toxicity in 77 heavily pretreated pts (Witzig TE et al, Leukemia 2011; 25,341–7). The purpose of this study was to establish the safety and efficacy of everolimus in combination with hyper-CVAD in pts with relapsed/refractory ALL, and to study effects of everolimus on AKT/mTOR signaling in ALL blasts. Methods: In this single center phase I/II study, pts aged 10 years or older with relapsed/refractory ALL or lymphoblastic lymphoma were treated with oral everolimus at a daily dose of 5 mg or 10 mg in combination with the standard hyper-CVAD regimen (Kantarjian HM et al, J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb;18(3):547–61) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints were to establish safety (after 2 cycles) and efficacy. Secondary endpoints included assessments of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. Results: Twelve pts have been enrolled and are evaluable for response. Median was age 24 years (range, 11–59). Five pts had T-ALL and 7 had Philadelphia chromosome negative precursor-B-ALL. Median number of prior treatments was 2 (range, 1–4); 5 pts were 1st salvage attempts. Three pts received everolimus 5 mg/day and 9 were treated with 10 mg/day continuously in combination with hyper-CVAD. Median number of cycles given was 2 (range, 1–4). Median follow-up was 12 months (range, 7–23). Three pts achieved CR (all were 1st salvage attempts) and 1 patient had CRi (second salvage); 2 pts achieved PR. No responses were seen beyond second salvage. Of the 9 pts completing 2 cycles, both EFS and OS were not reached for 3 pts in the 1st salvage, and were 8.5 weeks and 18.5 weeks respectively for pts in second salvage and beyond (P=.01 and P=0.04). Of the 12 pts (including 3 only treated with one cycle), both EFS and OS were not reached for 3 pts in the 1st salvage, and were 10 weeks and 18 weeks respectively for pts in second salvage and beyond (P=0.17 and P=0.05). Treatment-related toxicities in the 9 pts evaluable for MTD (completed 2 cycles) included 3 episodes of grade 3 mucositis, which was a dose-limiting toxicity, 3 episodes of grade 4 infections (sepsis) and 9 episodes of grade 3 infections (neutropenic fever, pneumonia, bacteremia). There was no deaths on-study. Inhibition of mTOR signaling (p-pS6K) was observed in 5 of 8 (62%) patient samples tested, at both the 5 and 10 mg dose levels, suggesting that 5 mg is sufficient to block the pathway. Lack of inhibition of p-pEBP1 and pAKT argues for potential benefit of second generation mTOR inhibitors or dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitors. Conclusions: We conclude that administration of hyper-CVAD plus everolimus is well-tolerated. The study warrants further investigation of next generation mTOR inhibitors in combination with hyper-CVAD for ALL in relapsed and frontline settings. Disclosures: Cortes: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2529-2529
Author(s):  
Nan Jiang ◽  
Zhenhua Li ◽  
Grace Shimin Koh ◽  
Yi Lu ◽  
Shirley K.Y. Kham ◽  
...  

Abstract Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common form of childhood cancer with excellent treatment outcome where >80% are cured. However, relapse and therapy-related toxicities limit further improvements and greatly increase the cost of therapy. Vincristine (VCR) is cheap, well tolerated, and highly effective. Using VCR optimally will help improve the cost-benefit ratio favorably by allowing us to reduce toxicities like infections from myelosuppression and yet improving cure. The highly successful BFM-ALL treatment backbone starts with a single intrathecal methotrexate on Day 1 followed by 7 days of oral prednisolone (PRED). The persistence of absolute blasts count >1,000/µL at Day 8 (D8), known as PRED poor response, confers a significantly poorer treatment outcome. To avoid seeding the CNS with leukemia from traumatic taps, the new Ma-Spore ALL 2010 treatment protocol, omitted intrathecal methotrexate at Day 1 and replaced with VCR at Day 0. By June 2013, a total of 133 patients have been enrolled. We found that the number of poor PRED responders was halved from the historical 9.5% in the previous Ma-Spore ALL 2003 study (Yeoh et al. J Clin Oncol 2013) to only 4.7% of patients in the ALL 2010 study. In addition, the percentage of MRD standard risk patients (Day 33 blast count ≤1x10-4) increased from 38.9% in the Ma-Spore ALL 2003 to 51.8% in the Ma-Spore ALL 2010 study (P<0.001). The 2-year event-free survival (EFS) for good and poor D8 response patients under the Ma-Spore ALL 2010 trial remained similar to the ALL 2003 study despite only half the number of PRED poor responders (Fig. 1). These data taken together suggests that VCR and PRED combination is highly synergistic and can improve early treatment response. We investigated VCR and PRED combination in PRED and VCR-resistant (VCR-R) cell lines. Specifically, REH cell line is intrinsically resistant to PRED in vitro because of a mutation in its glucocorticoid receptor. We exposed the REH cell line to increasing concentrations of VCR over 6 months and generated a VCR resistant REH cell line (Fig. 2). This VCR-R REH cell line is resistant to both PRED or VCR when exposed individually in vitro. However when exposed to both PRED and VCR in combination, only 30% of the resistant cells survived (P<0.01). We found that the drug efflux transporter multi-drug resistance protein 1 (MDR1) was preferentially highly expressed in our VCR-R cell line models. To determine if the highly expressed MDR1 is responsible for treatment resistance, we exposed the VCR-R cell lines to VCR, verapamil (an MDR1 inhibitor) and combination of both VCR and verapamil. The combination of VCR and verapamil increased the G2 cell cycle arrest by 3- folds compared to when VCR was used alone (Fig. 3), supporting the role of MDR1 in treatment resistance. Interestingly we also found that the combination of VCR and PRED led to a decrease in levels of MDR1 expression by western blot, suggesting that depletion of MDR1 may be a mechanism through which VCR and PRED combination therapy enhances leukemic cell killing. We also investigated microenvironment-mediated resistance to VCR and PRED using mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) co-culture systems. It was found that after co-culture with MSC or in conditional medium containing soluble factors secreted by MSC, leukemic cells were resistant to VCR and PRED mono-treatment, but the resistance was abrogated after combinatorial therapy. In conclusion, VCR in combination with PRED improves D8 peripheral blood treatment response during early induction in our Ma-Spore 2010 trial. This synergistic combination results from its ability to reverse resistance from intrinsic overexpression of MDR1 in resistant leukemia cells and decrease microenvironment-contributed resistance by mesenchymal cells. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2478-2478
Author(s):  
Andrea Ghelli Luserna Di Rora ◽  
Ilaria Iacobucci ◽  
Enrica Imbrogno ◽  
Enrico Derenzini ◽  
Anna Ferrari ◽  
...  

Abstract Nowadays the effectiveness of the treatments for adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) patients is still inadequate and frequently many patients after years of response to treatments develop relapses. Thus there is a need to find novel targets for specific therapies and to maximize the effect of the actual treatments. Recently different Checkpoint Kinase (Chk)1/Chk2 inhibitors has been assessed for the treatment of different type of cancers but only few studies have been performed on hematological diseases. We evaluated the effectiveness of the Chk1 inhibitor, LY2606368, as single agent and in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (imatinib and dasatinib) or with the purine nucleoside antimetabolite clofarabine in B-/T- acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cell lines and in primary blasts. Human B (BV-173, SUPB-15, NALM-6, NALM-19 and REH) and T (MOLT-4, RPMI-8402 and CEM) ALL cell lines were incubated with increasing concentrations of drug (1-100 nM) for 24 and 48 hours and the reduction of the cell viability was evaluated using WST-1 reagent. LY2606368 deeply reduced the cell viability in a dose and time dependent manner in all the cell lines, with the BV-173 (6.33 nM IC50 24hrs) and RPMI-8402 (8.07 nM IC50 24hrs) being the most sensitive while SUP-B15 (61.4 nM IC50 24hrs) and REH (96.7 nM IC50 24hrs) being the less sensitive cell lines. Moreover the sensitivity to the compound was no correlated with the different sub-type of ALL or with the mutational status of p53, which is a marker of the functionality of the G1/S checkpoint. The cytotoxic activity was confirmed by the significant increment of apoptosis cells (Annexin V/Propidium Iodide), by the increment of gH2AX foci and by the activation of different apoptotic markers (Parp-1 and pro-Caspase3 cleavage). To understand the relationship between the activation of apoptosis and the effect on cell cycle and to identify hypothetical mechanisms of death, different cell cycle analyses were performed (Propidium Iodide staining). The inhibition of Chk1, deeply changed the cell cycle profile. Indeed in all the cell lines the percentage of cells in S phase and in G2/M phase were reduced by the treatment while the numbers of cells in sub-G1 and G1 phase were increased. The hypothetical function of LY2606368 as a chemosensitizer agent was evaluated combining the compound with different drugs normally used in clinical trials. For each drugs the combination strongly reduced the cell viability when compared to the cytotoxic effect of the single drugs. Moreover the combination showed an additive efficacy in term of induction of DNA damages as showed by the increase number of gH2AX foci and the activation of pChk1 (ser 317). The results found on the cell lines were confirmed also using primary leukemic blast isolated from adult Philadelphia-positive ALL patients. Indeed LY2606368 as single agent or in combination with the Tki, imatinib, was able to deeply reduce the cell viability and to induce DNA damages (gH2AX foci). In conclusion LY2606368 showed a strong cytotoxic activity on B-/T-All cell lines and primary blasts as single agent and in combination with other drugs. In our opinion this data are the basis for a future clinical evaluation of this compound in the treatment of leukemia. Supported by ELN, AIL, AIRC, progetto Regione-Università 2010-12 (L. Bolondi), FP7 NGS-PTL project. Disclosures Soverini: Novartis, Briston-Myers Squibb, ARIAD: Consultancy. Cavo:JANSSEN, CELGENE, AMGEN: Consultancy. Martinelli:ROCHE: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; AMGEN: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4014-4014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Anne Couturier ◽  
Xavier Thomas ◽  
Francoise Huguet ◽  
Céline Berthon ◽  
Célestine Simand ◽  
...  

Abstract Prognosis of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph1+ ALL) has been considerably improved since the beginning of the BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) era 20 years ago. However, the prognosis of patients with a refractory/relapsed (including molecular relapse) disease is still very dismal. New drugs or combination of new drugs may improve outcomes of these patients. For example, ponatinib, a 3rd-generation oral TKI, known to have activity against BCR-ABL1 T315I mutations, has shown some efficacy in this context. Similarly, a recent study has reported very encouraging results of the bispecific anti-CD3/CD19 monoclonal antibody blinatumomab as single-agent in refractory/relapsed Ph1+ ALL. Data regarding the efficacy and tolerance of a combination of blinatumomab+ponatinib (blina/pona) are still scarce. This was a retrospective study with the aim to report outcomes of patients receiving a combination of blina/pona for refractory/relapsed Ph1+ ALL in France. Fifteen adults from 8 French centers were identified and data were collected by physicians of each centers, then gathered for the purpose of this study. There were 9 males and 6 females, with a median age of 53 years (range:17-72). All patients, but 2 with blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia, had de novo Ph1+ ALL. Four cases had BCR-ABL1 T315I mutation. Patients received the blina/pona combination, either after a first (n=8) or a second (n=7) cytologic relapse. There was no refractory patient in theses series. Previous allograft and autograft has been performed in 7 and 2 patients, respectively. The majority of patients (n=12) had previously received 2 or more lines of TKI. The median time between the first cycle of blina/pona and diagnosis was 14 months (range: 8-40). The median number of blinatumomab cycle (28 mg/day by continuous infusion for 28 days every 6 weeks) administered per patient was 3 (range: 1-6) while ponatinib was concomittantly administered continuously at an initial dose of 45 mg once daily in 11 pts (73%) and 30 mg in 4 pts (27%). Median duration of ponatinib administration was 4 months (range: 1.1-10.9) from first blinatumomab cycle. The toxicity profile was safe: all patients received a complete first cycle without grade 3-4 adverse events. After cycle 1, blinatumomab was stopped in 47% of cases because of neurologic events in 4 and infections in 3; ponatinib was stopped in 33% of cases because of neurologic events in 3, fluid retention in 1 and severe arteriopathy in 1 patient with other vascular disease risk factors. All neurologic events resolved after stopping blinatumomab or ponatinib. The majority of patients were evaluated after one cycle (n=11, after cycle 2 n=3, after cycle 3 n=1). All but one patients (93%) obtained a cytologic complete remission (CR), of whom 12/14 (86%) achieved a complete molecular response. However, 2 patients were documented with CNS relapse at the time of blina/pona evaluation although in bone marrow molecular remission. Both obtained clearance of leukemic blasts after intrathecal infusion of chemotherapy. Then, 5 patients underwent allogeneic transplant (including 2 patients already allotransplanted before blina/pona) and 1 patient received donor lymphocyte infusion. Seven cases pursued maintenance therapy with ponatinib as single agent after stopping blinatumomab. With a median follow-up of 8 months (range: 2.6-30.2) for alive patients, median overall and leukemia-free survivals from first cycle of blina/pona were 8.5 months (range: 1.7-30.2) and 8 months (range: 1.3-30.2), respectively. At last follow-up (July 2018), only 4 relapses had occurred at a median of 3.3 months (range: 1.3-8.3) from first blina/pona cycle and 6 patients had died (3 bacterial infections, 1 fungal infection, 1 secondary cancer and 1 ALL relapse). All alive patients (n=9) but one (cytologic CR but detectable minimal residual disease) are in complete molecular response. Four patients are still under ponatinib medication at last follow-up. The combination of blinatumomab+ponatinib appears effective and tolerable in relapsed Ph1+ALL patients and may replace chemotherapy salvage regimens. The combination should be tested in first-line therapy in the future. Our results have also to be confirmed prospectively on a larger cohort of patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2089-2089
Author(s):  
Arinobu Tojo ◽  
Kiyoko Izawa ◽  
Rieko Sekine ◽  
Tokiko Nagamura ◽  
Minoru Yoshida ◽  
...  

Abstract Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-ALL) is one of the most intractable hematological malignancies, and readily acquires resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs including imatinib mesylate. We hypothesized that the adhesive interaction of Ph-ALL cells with bone marrow stromal cells might cause their escape from drug-induced apoptosis and subsequent minimal residual disease, resulting in the generation of a chemoresistant clone such as a clone harboring mutant BCR-ABL. To gain insight into this possibility and a novel strategy against imatinib resistance, we used two Ph-ALL cell lines designated as IMS-PhL1 (L1) and IMS-PhL2 (L2). L1 cells had wild type BCR-ABL, whereas L2 cells had Y253H mutant and revealed 10-fold or more resistance to imatinib, compared with L1 cells. The growth of L1 cells was autonomous and their spontaneous apoptosis was suppressed by co-culture with a murine bone marrow stromal cell line, HESS-5. In contrast, the sustained growth and survival of L2 cells was absolutely dependent on direct contact with HESS-5. Both cell lines adhered to and migrated beneath the HESS-5 cell layer, resulting in the formation of cobblestone areas (CA). While floating L1 cells were eradicated by 1 mM imatinib, a portion of adherent L1 cells could survive even at 10 μM imatinib. Similarly, L2 cells forming CA beneath the HESS-5 cell layer considerably resisted prolonged exposure to 10 μM imatinib. Leptomycin B (LMB), a potent inhibitor of CRM1/exportin-1, can trap BCR-ABL in the nucleus and can aggressively eliminate BCR-ABL+ cells in combination with imatinib (Wang et al., 2001). We tested LMB for its ability to eliminate CA or adherent Ph-ALL cells in combination with imatinb. The result for L2 cells was shown in Figure. Dramatically, combined use of 10 μM imatinib and 1 nM LMB for 7 days exerted a synergistic effect on reduction in the number of CA. L1 cells were also susceptible to the combination of imatinib and LMB. Our results suggest that nuclear entrapment of BCR-ABL may be a promising strategy for overcoming imatinib resistance mediated by stromal cells as well as a certain BCR-ABL mutant. Figure Figure


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4483-4483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep-Maria Ribera ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
Marcos Gonzalez ◽  
Maria-Belen Vidriales ◽  
Blanca Xicoy ◽  
...  

Abstract Imatinib mesylate as a single agent has modest activity in refractory/relapsed Ph-positive ALL. Use of concurrent chemotherapy and imatinib mesylate in newly diagnosed Ph-positive ALL was explored. Nineteen patients (pts) with de novo Ph-positive ALL were included in a prospective trial. Induction chemotherapy consisted of imatinib mesylate (400 mg/d, p.o.) and VCR (1.5mg/m2/wk), DNR (60 mg/m2/wk) and PDN (60mg/m2/d) for 4 weeks if adequate bone marrow response (&lt;5% blast cells) at day +14 was observed. If not mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2, d15, 16, 17) and HD-ARAC (1,000mg/m2/12h d 18, 19) were administered. Consolidation chemotherapy (C1) included imatinib mesylate and MP, HD-MTX (1.5 g/m2), VM-26 and ARA-C. Pts with a HLA-identical family or MUD donor were submitted to SCT. IF no MUD donor was found a second consolidation cycle (C2) with imatinib mesylate, VCR, DNR, DXM and CPM was administered. Pts without family donor or with no MUD donor after 6 mo. of active search were submitted to autologous SCT. After SCT imatinib mesylate was administered from the sustained hematological recovery to the eventual relapse or at least up to 1 yr. of continuous molecular remission. Sequential MRD study was performed by cytofluorometry and quantitative RT-PCR. Up to July 2004, 19 pts (10 males, mean [SD] age 43[12] yr., range 17–62, p190bcr-abl in 75% of the cases) were included. One pt is still on treatment, 1 died in induction because of infection, 1 was refractory and the remaining 16 (89%) attained CR. Slow bone marrow response was observed in 4 out of 14 evaluable pts. Three patients have relapsed before SCT, 8 are on consolidation therapy and SCT was performed in 5 (3 from family donor and 2 MUD). 1 pt died after SCT and no relapses after SCT have been observed to date (range 1–6 months from SCT). With a median follow-up of 5 (0.2–14) mo., 3 pts have died, 2 are alive in second CR and 13 are in first CR, with a median DFS of 8 mo. and an OS probability of 66±30%. Levels of BCR-ABL/GUS x100 less than 0.05 were observed in 6/12 (50%) pts at the end of induction therapy. There was a further 1–2 log median reduction of BCR/ABL transcripts at the end of C1, (BCR-ABL/GUS x100 less than 0.05 in 5/6 cases). No additional reduction of transcripts was observed between C1 and SCT. A good correlation between molecular and cytofluorometric MRD data was observed. Use of concurrent chemotherapy and imatinib mesylate in newly diagnosed Ph-positive ALL pts is feasible and the preliminary data are promising in terms of high rate of clinical and molecular CR. Continued accrual and longer follow-up of the current cohort is needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document