Tendency towards Minor Bleeding in Women Is Associated with a Reduced Risk for Major Bleeding, without Apparent Differences in Level of Anticoagulation during Treatment with Vitamin K Antagonist.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 889-889
Author(s):  
Nic J.G.M. Veeger ◽  
Margriet Piersma-Wichers ◽  
Jan van der Meer

Abstract Easy bruising is frequently found in healthy women. This mild bleeding tendency may be enhanced by treatment with vitamin K antagonists. This may result in more intense monitoring of the level of anticoagulation (INR) to improve the individual time within target range (ITTR) and consequently to reduce the risk of major bleeding. We performed a retrospective study in 6758 consecutive patients receiving vitamin K antagonists for primary or secondary prophylaxis of venous or arterial thrombosis (mean age 67, 51% male and 189762 INRs in 6681 person-years) to evaluate differences in gender on the occurrence of minor and major bleeding, as well as the ITTR. The incidence rates (IR, per 100 person-years) of minor and major bleeding were assessed and survival analysis performed to obtain adjusted hazard ratios (HR, 95%CI) for major bleeding in men versus women with or without prior minor bleeding, controlling for significant patient characteristics. Minor bleeding occurred more frequently in women than men (IR=33.2 versus 21.1, respectively; HR=1.5, 95%CI 1.4–1.7, p<0.001), whereas major bleeding showed a tendency towards a higher incidence in men (IR=1.6 versus 2.0; HR=1.3, 95%CI 0.9–1.8, p=0.20). Figure Figure However, in women with prior minor bleeding, the incidence of major bleeding was low (IR=1.3, 95% CI 0.7–2.1), when compared to men with minor bleeding (3.3, 95%C 2.2–4.7) (HR =2.7, 95% CI 1.4–5.0, p=0.002). Men and women without prior minor bleeding had comparable incidences of major bleeding (IR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3–2.5, and 1.5, 95% CI 1.1–2.1, respectively), but both were higher than in women with prior minor bleeding (HR 1.4 (0.8–2.5, p=0.30 and 1.2 (0.7–2.2, p=0.55)). These differences were even more pronounced in patients at high risk of major bleeding due to a strongly reduced ITTR (ITTR below 30%, lowest quartile). Considering the actually achieved level of anticoagulation, there were no differences between men and women with or without prior minor bleeding that could explain the reduced risk of major bleeding in women with prior minor bleeding. With 42% to 43%, the ITTR was comparable, as was the time spend above INR 5.0 (6% to 7%). In conclusion, more frequent minor bleeding in women was associated with a reduced incidence of major bleeding, whereas in men, such a reversed association was not present. Differences in intensity of INR monitoring in patients with or without minor bleeding and as a result in actual level of anticoagulation, could not be demonstrated.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 987-987
Author(s):  
Nic J.G.M. Veeger ◽  
Margriet Piersma-Wichers ◽  
Hans L. Hillege ◽  
Jan van der Meer

Abstract Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are widely used in the treatment and primary and secondary prevention of thromboembolism. Although these drugs have shown to be effective, the associated risk of bleeding is an important limitation. We hypothesized that minor bleeding could be associated with the risk of major bleeding. Even early minor bleeding, i.e. within the first 30 days of VKA therapy, could be an indicator for an increased risk of major bleeding. On the other hand, early minor bleeding could lead to intensified monitoring of VKA therapy and consequently improved quality of anticoagulation, thereby modifying the risk of major bleeding. To evaluate the supposed association between minor and major bleeding in patients on VKA, a cohort of 6758 consecutive patients in whom VKA therapy was controlled by a Dutch anticoagulant clinic was retrospectively studied. Differences in risk of major bleeding between patients without early minor bleeding and patients with early minor bleeding were evaluated by multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, also taking into consideration differences in individual time within target range of anticoagulation (ITTR). Overall, 19.9% of the patients (N=1348) had a minor bleeding, corresponding with an incidence rate (IR, expressed per 100 person-years) of 25.1 (95%CI, 23.8 to 26.5). In 4.4% of the patients (N=300), minor bleeding had occurred within the first 30 days of VKA therapy. Major bleeding had occurred in 1.8% of the patients (N=119); IR=1.8 (95%CI, 2.9 to 3.8). The risk of a major bleeding was significantly higher in patients with early minor bleeding (IR=4.8; 95%CI, 2.6 to 8.3), compared to patients without early minor bleeding (IR=1.7; 95%CI, 1.4 to 2.0); hazard ratio=2.4 (95%CI, 1.4 to 4.4; P=0.003). Taking the achieved level of anticoagulation into consideration, major bleeding occurred significantly more frequently in patients with a poor response to VKA, defined as individual time within target range (ITTR) of less than 25% of the total treatment time (lowest quintile of patients); hazard ratio=2.7 (95%CI, 1.7 to 4.3; P<0.001). Figure 1 shows the adjusted hazard ratios for all risk indicators that were independently associated with major bleeding. In addition to early minor bleeding and ITTR < 25%, age, gender, malignancy and the use of NSAIDs were also associated with major bleeding. As already indicated by the increased risk of major bleeding in patients with early minor bleeding, as well as in patients with a poor response to VKA, a risk modification after early minor bleeding due to intensified monitoring of VKA therapy, resulting in improved quality of anticoagulation is not plausible. In fact, ITTR in patients with an early minor bleeding was 40% versus 42% in patients without early minor bleeding (p=0.07). Furthermore, INR in patients with an early minor bleeding were more frequently above 5.0 (9%) than in patients without early minor bleeding (7%; p< 0.01). Our findings confirm the hypothesis of early minor bleeding as independent risk indicator and contradicts the assumption of a risk modifying effect. In fact, reduced ITTR and early minor bleeding were both strong independent risk indicators for major bleeding. Figure 1 Adjusted hazard ratios of major bleeding from multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Figure 1. Adjusted hazard ratios of major bleeding from multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Brockmeyer ◽  
Y Lin ◽  
C Parco ◽  
A Karathanos ◽  
T Krieger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Uninterrupted anticoagulation during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (CAAF) became standard of care after positive results of trials investigating vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Previous studies and meta-analyses of uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) vs. VKA have given controversial results. We thus aimed to elucidate the risks and benefits of uninterrupted DOAC vs. VKA during CAAF in an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods Online databases were searched for RCTs comparing uninterrupted DOAC to VKA in patients undergoing CAAF until September 2019. Data from retrieved studies were analysed in a comprehensive meta-analysis. Primary safety outcome was major bleeding; primary efficacy outcome was stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Secondary outcomes included a composite of major bleeding and stroke or TIA, minor bleeding, acute cerebral lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (ACL) and mortality. Results Six eligible RCTs comprising 2,369 patients were included. Pooled meta-analysis showed no significant differences in DOAC vs. VKA concerning the rates of major bleeding (2.2% vs. 3.8%; odds ratio (OR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30–1.56; p=0.37) and stroke or TIA (0.2% vs. 0.2%; OR 0.97, CI 0.20–4.72; p=0.97). There were no significant differences found in secondary outcomes (OR 0.73, p=0.49 for composite of major bleeding and stroke or TIA; OR 1.08, p=0.52 for minor bleeding; OR 1.12, p=0.59 for ACL; and OR=0.60, p=0.64 for all-cause mortality). Conclusion Our meta-analysis suggests that uninterrupted periprocedural anticoagulation with DOAC or VKA is characterized by a similar risk/benefit ratio in patients undergoing CAAF with comparable rates of major bleeding and stroke. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Medical faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3637-3637
Author(s):  
Sam Schulman ◽  
James Douketis ◽  
Rebecca Barty, MLT ◽  
Agnes Y.Y. Lee ◽  
Marc Carrier ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The risk of major bleeding in association with perioperative management of vitamin K antagonists is about 3% according to systematic reviews. We performed this study to evaluate the safety of perioperative management of dabigatran using a specified protocol. Methods Patients at least 18 years old, treated with dabigatran and planned for an invasive procedure were eligible for inclusion. The last dose of dabigatran before the procedure was at 24 h (creatinine clearance [CrCl] > 50 mL/min and standard bleeding risk), 48 h (CrCl 31-50 mL/h or increased bleeding risk) or 96 h (CrCl 31-50 mL/h and increased bleeding risk). Resumption was in the evening of the procedure with the first dose of 75 mg (hemostasis secured and low bleeding risk), postop day 1, 2 or 3, depending on the complexity of the surgery and consequences of a bleeding complication; all prespecified. Patients were followed for 30 days for major bleeding (primary outcome), minor bleeding, arterial thromboembolism and death and an independent committee adjudicated these events by. We calculated a sample size of 283 cases to exclude a doubling of major bleeding compared to historical warfarin with heparin bridging. The study was funded by Heart and Stroke Foundation Canada. Results We included 286 patients, mean age of 70.6 years (standard deviation, 11.7), 44 (15%) patients had CrCl 31-50 mL/min and 2 (0.7%) had 30 mL/min or less. The planned procedure was considered as “increased bleeding risk” in 102 (36%) patients. The last dose of dabigatran was at 24, 48 and 96 h before surgery in 160, 103 and 23 patients, respectively. Resumption with 75 mg the same day was in 139 patients. Major bleeding occurred in 3 patients (1.05%; 2 adjudicated so far); a 70-year-old male underwent ultrasound-guided drainage of abdomen and was readmitted after 17 days due to rectal bleeding and light headedness; the second patient, an 81-year-old male bled more than expected during the procedure of wide resection of myxosarcoma with free flap rotation and received blood transfusions during surgery, and a 69-year-old male bled 1200 mL during hip revision arthroplasty and received 3 units of red cells. Minor bleeding was observed in 9 adjudicated cases and reported in 10 additional, so far not adjudicated, cases. There were no strokes, systemic emboli, transient ischemic attacks, venous thromboembolic events or deaths. Three serious adverse events were reported (chest pain, congestive heart failure, wound infection) Conclusion With our protocol for perioperative management of dabigatran the risk of major bleeding compares favorably with historical data on vitamin K antagonists. Disclosures: Schulman: Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Dabigatran etexilate is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor approved for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and (outside the US) for prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement. This presentation includes discussion of the following off-label use of dabigatran: treatment of venous thromboembolism. Douketis:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria. Lee:Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria. Heddle:CIHR: Research Funding; Canadian Blood Services: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Health Canada: Research Funding.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1081-1091
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Bassand ◽  
Saverio Virdone ◽  
Marc Badoz ◽  
Freek W. A. Verheugt ◽  
A. John Camm ◽  
...  

Abstract In atrial fibrillation (AF), lower risks of death and bleeding with non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were reported in meta-analyses of controlled trials, but whether these findings hold true in real-world practice remains uncertain. Risks of bleeding and death were assessed in 52 032 patients with newly diagnosed AF enrolled in GARFIELD-AF (Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD–Atrial Fibrillation), a worldwide prospective registry. Baseline treatment was vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) with or without antiplatelet (AP) agents (VKA ± AP) (20 151; 39.3%), NOACs ± AP agents (14 103; 27.5%), AP agents only (10 748; 21.0%), or no antithrombotics (6219; 12.1%). One-year follow-up event rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) of minor, clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM), and major bleedings were 2.29 (2.16-2.43), 1.10 (1.01-1.20), and 1.31 (1.21-1.41) per 100 patient-years, respectively. Bleeding risk was lower with NOACs than VKAs for any bleeding (hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI]), 0.85 [0.73-0.98]) or major bleeding (0.79 [0.60-1.04]). Compared with no bleeding, the risk of death was higher with minor bleeding (adjusted HR [aHR], 1.53 [1.07-2.19]), CRNM bleeding (aHR, 2.59 [1.80-3.73]), and major bleeding (aHR, 8.24 [6.76-10.04]). The all-cause mortality rate was lower with NOACs than with VKAs (aHR, 0.73 [0.62-0.85]). Forty-five percent (114) of all deaths occurred within 30 days, and 40% of these were from intracranial/intraspinal hemorrhage (ICH). The rates of any bleeding and all-cause death were lower with NOACs than with VKAs. Major bleeding was associated with the highest risk of death. CRNM bleeding and minor bleeding were associated with a higher risk of death compared to no bleeding. Death within 30 days after a major bleed was most frequently related to ICH. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01090362.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Shaojie Chen ◽  
K. R. Julian Chun ◽  
Zhiyu Ling ◽  
Shaowen Liu ◽  
Lin Zhu ◽  
...  

Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in preventing thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation (AF). Non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) have an improved safety profile over VKAs; however, evidence regarding their effect on cardiovascular and neurological outcomes relative to LAAO is limited. Up-to-date randomized trials or propensity-score-matched data comparing LAAO vs. NOACs in high-risk patients with AF were pooled in our study. A total of 2849 AF patients (LAAO: 1368, NOACs: 1481, mean age: 75 ± 7.5 yrs, 63.5% male) were enrolled. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.3 ± 1.7, and the mean HAS-BLED score was 3.4 ± 1.2. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. In the LAAO group, the success rate of device implantation was 98.8%. During a mean follow-up of 2 years, as compared with NOACs, LAAO was associated with a significant reduction of ISTH major bleeding (p = 0.0002). There were no significant differences in terms of ischemic stroke (p = 0.61), ischemic stroke/thromboembolism (p = 0.63), ISTH major and clinically relevant minor bleeding (p = 0.73), cardiovascular death (p = 0.63), and all-cause mortality (p = 0.71). There was a trend toward reduction of combined major cardiovascular and neurological endpoints in the LAAO group (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.64–1.11, p = 0.12). In conclusion, for high-risk AF patients, LAAO is associated with a significant reduction of ISTH major bleeding without increased ischemic events, as compared to “contemporary NOACs”. The present data show the superior role of LAAO over NOACs among high-risk AF patients in terms of reduction of major bleeding; however, more randomized controlled trials are warranted.


Thrombosis ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron B. Holley ◽  
Christopher S. King ◽  
Jeffrey L. Jackson ◽  
Lisa K. Moores

Introduction. Controversy remains over the optimal length of anticoagulation following idiopathic venous thromboembolism. We sought to determine if a longer, finite course of anticoagulation offered additional benefit over a short course in the initial treatment of the first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. Data Extraction. Rates of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, combined venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and mortality were extracted from prospective trials enrolling patients with first time, idiopathic venous thromboembolism. Data was pooled using random effects meta-regression. Results. Ten trials, with a total of 3225 patients, met inclusion criteria. For each additional month of initial anticoagulation, once therapy was stopped, recurrent venous thromboembolism (0.03 (95% CI: −0.28 to 0.35); ), mortality (−0.10 (95% CI: −0.24 to 0.04); ), and major bleeding (−0.01 (95% CI: −0.05 to 0.02); ) rates measured in percent per patient years, did not significantly change. Conclusions: Patients with an initial idiopathic venous thromboembolism should be treated with 3 to 6 months of secondary prophylaxis with vitamin K antagonists. At that time, a decision between continuing with indefinite therapy can be made, but there is no benefit to a longer (but finite) course of therapy.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e0164485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nienke van Rein ◽  
Willem M. Lijfering ◽  
Mettine H. A. Bos ◽  
Martien H. Herruer ◽  
Helga W. Vermaas ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. 74-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farès Moustafa ◽  
Alexander Stehouwer ◽  
Pieter Kamphuisen ◽  
Joan Carles Sahuquillo ◽  
Ángel Sampériz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document