Differences in Haematological and Non Haematological Toxicity during Treatment with Imatinib in Early and Late Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4281-4281
Author(s):  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Roberto Latagliata ◽  
Laura Cannella ◽  
Ida Carmosino ◽  
Caterina Stefanizzi ◽  
...  

Abstract Imatinib is a relatively specific inhibitor of the BCR/ABL tyrosine kinase, effective in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Aim of present study was to analyse the frequency and type of hematological and non hematological adverse events in our series of late and early chronic phase CML patients treated with imatinib and correlate the grade of hematological toxicity with the response obtained. Hematological adverse events were seen in 59 out of 150 (39%) late CP patients: 20 patients (34%) experienced toxicity grade 1, 25 (42%) had toxicity grade 2 and 14 (24%) had toxicity grade 3–4. Of 100 early CP patients, 26 (26%) experienced hematological adverse event: 42% had toxicity grade 1, 50% had toxicity grade 2 and 7% had toxicity grade 3–4. Statistical differences were detected between early and late CP patients for grade 1–2 and 3–4 toxicity. Median duration of toxicity in late CP patients was 20 days (range 4–41) for grade 1, 16 days (range 4–27) for grade 2 and 18 days (range 8–40) for grade 3–4. In early CP patients the median duration of toxicity was 10 days (range 4–21) for grade 1, 14 days (range 6–28) for grade 2 and of 10 days (range 7–15) for grade 3–4. We analysed the clinical features associated to a greater risk of myelosuppression and found that a lower haemoglobin level was significant in early CP patients while a history of cytopenia during IFN therapy and a longer time elapsing from diagnosis was significant in late CP patients. The occurrence of hematological toxicity in late CP patients was associated to the persistent lack of complete cytogenetic response, whereas this correlation was not apparent in early CP patients. We compared the incidence of non hematological adverse events occurring in late and in early CP patients and found that in these latter some side effects were more frequent, such as weight gain, periorbital oedema (p=0.02), muscle cramps (p=0.03), skin rashes (p=0.002), diarrhoea (p=0.01), weeping (p=0.001) and infections (p=0.001). In late CP patients compared to early CP patients, we found as significant the occurrence during therapy of bone pain (p=0.001) and of hemorrhagic symptoms (p=0.002) in the absence of severe thrombocytopenia. Grade 3–4 adverse events were recorded at rates below 4% and decreased over time: in late CP patients hemorrhages and muscle cramps were the most common side effects of grade 3–4, whereas in early CP patients the most frequent events were nausea, weight gain and cutaneous rash. Cardiac toxicity was observed in 3 out of 250 patients and cardiac events most frequently occurred in elderly patients with pre-existing conditions that predispose to fluid retention, with overall frequency of these events being 1%. In conclusion, we have observed that hematological and non-hematological side effects during imatinib therapy are different among late and early CP patients and that severe hematological toxicity may influence cytogenetic response.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2290-2290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Meir Wetzler ◽  
Jeff Lipton ◽  
Franck E Nicolini ◽  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2290 Introduction: Multiple TKI failure is a growing problem in a subset of CML patients. Treatment with a third TKI after two have failed often yields poor results. New treatment options are needed for this patient population. OM is a first-in-class cetaxine with demonstrated activity as a single agent in CML. It inhibits the production of short-lived oncoproteins (such as Mcl-1) involved in cancer cell survival via a mechanism independent of Bcr-Abl binding. Several studies have suggested that OM has a favorable toxicity profile when given to patients with CML via the subcutaneous route. We explored OM efficacy and safety in a subset of patients who had received therapy with multiple prior approved TKI. Methods: We analyzed a subset of adult CML-CP patients who had received two or more TKI (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib), from a combined interim dataset of two prospective Phase 2 studies (CML-202, for patients with the T315I kinase domain mutation, and CML-203, for patients with failure to ≥2 TKI) utilizing OM in the treatment adult patients with all phases of CML who had failed TKI. TKI failure was defined as no complete hematologic response (CHR) by 12 weeks (wk), no cytogenetic response by 6 months (mo), no major cytogenetic response (MCyR) by 12 mo, loss of CHR or MCyR, or progressive leukocytosis. The focus of this analysis was to assess the CHR and MCyR response rates as well as the overall safety of OM in these patients. Adverse events presented are Grade 3/4 events that occurred in ≥ 5% of patients (regardless of causality). Results: A total of 73 of the 93 CML-CP patients from these two studies had received two or more TKI prior to OM treatment. Median time from initial CML diagnosis to first dose of OM was 74.4 months. Mutations of any kind were seen in 48% of the patients, whereas 29% had no identified mutation and 23% had no available data on mutation status. Sixty (82%) of these 73 patients achieved or maintained (twelve patients were in CHR at study entry) a CHR and 17 (23%) achieved a MCyR (9 complete and 8 partial). The median duration of MCyR was 4.4+ months (range 1.2–14.1+). Median overall survival for patients treated with OM after failure of 2 or more TKI has not yet been reached [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 22.9, NA months] (Figure 1). Eleven patients had a treatment—emergent adverse event leading to death, and two deaths were probably related to study drug. Median progression-free survival was 11.1 months (95% CI 6.5, 13.8 months). Median follow-up time was 7.5 months for all patients with twenty-five patients remaining on study at the time of this data cut. A total of 36 of the 93 CP patients from these two studies had been treated with three or more TKI; 27 (75.0%) achieved or maintained a CHR and 7 (19.4%) achieved a MCyR (4 complete and 3 partial) on OM treatment. The median duration of MCyR in this group was 4.0+ months (range 1.2–11.5+) at the time of data cut-off. The primary Grade 3/4 adverse events in patients who received OM after failure of 2 or more TKI were hematologic, including thrombocytopenia (64%), neutropenia (48%) and anemia (40%) most commonly, followed by febrile neutropenia (12%), bone marrow failure (12%), pancytopenia (7%) and febrile bone marrow aplasia (6%). These events were dosing schedule dependent. Clinical sequelae were uncommon and managed with transient treatment interruptions and dose adjustments. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events were infrequent, with only fatigue (6%) occurring ≥5% of patients. Conclusions: OM, through a mechanism of action independent of Bcr-Abl, may offer a clinically viable option for patients who have progressed on multiple TKI treatment. Disclosures: Off Label Use: The drug is currently in development and has an NDA submitted for use in TKI resistant CML. Cram: ChemGenex: Employment, Equity Ownership. Humphriss: ChemGenex: Employment, Equity Ownership. Benichou: ChemGenex: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Craig: ChemGenex: Employment, Equity Ownership, Executive Management Level.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3234-3234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Giles ◽  
Philipp D. le Coutre ◽  
Kapil N. Bhalla ◽  
Gert J Ossenkoppele ◽  
Giuliana Alimena ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Treatment options are limited for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) CML who are resistant or intolerant to both imatinib and dasatinib. Nilotinib is a potent and highly selective BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of Ph+ CML patients in chronic (CML-CP) or accelerated phase (CML-AP) who are resistant or intolerant to prior therapy including imatinib. Here we report the updated results evaluating the safety and efficacy of nilotinib in patients with CML-CP who were either resistant or intolerant to both imatinib and dasatinib therapy. Methods: Nilotinib was dosed at 400 mg twice daily with an option to dose escalate to 600 mg twice daily in patients with inadequate hematologic and/or cytogenetic responses or disease progression. Results: A total of 37 patients (median age 62 years) with CML-CP were included in the analysis. The median time since first diagnosis of CML was 86 months. The median duration of prior imatinib therapy was 40.6 months with 84% being imatinib-resistant and 16% imatinib-intolerant. The median duration of prior dasatinib therapy was 6.6 months, with the majority of patients (65%) being intolerant to dasatinib therapy and 32% of patients were dasatinib resistant. Approximately half (51%) of the patients discontinued dasatinib due to grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities or adverse events (AEs) and 32% discontinued due to disease progression. The median duration of nilotinib exposure was 218 days (7.3 months; range 43–723 days) and 65% of patients remained on nilotinib at the time of data cut-off. In total, only 4 (11%) patients discontinued nilotinib due to AEs and 9 (24%) discontinued due to disease progression. For CML-CP patients without complete hematologic response (CHR) at baseline, 81% achieved CHR with nilotinib treatment. The median time to first CHR for patients with confirmed HR was 1 month. Major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was achieved in 38% of patients with median time to first MCyR being 1 month and median duration of MCyR being 9.7 months. Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) was achieved in 18% of patients. Estimated 1-year overall survival was 97%. The most frequent drug-related non-hematologic AEs on nilotinib were rash (22%), nausea (16%), and pruritus (14%). Newly occurring or worsening grade 3/4 hematologic laboratory abnormalities included neutropenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (24%), and anemia (5%). Other common grade 3/4 biochemical laboratory abnormalities included elevated lipase (24%), hyperglycemia (11%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (8%), and hypophosphatemia (8%). Brief dose interruptions were sufficient to manage most adverse events. Conclusions: Nilotinib is highly active in heavily pretreated CML-CP patients who failed both prior imatinib and dasatinib therapy. Importantly, most patients in this study were previously intolerant to dasatinib, and discontinuation of nilotinib in this study was uncommon. These results support nilotinib’s significant efficacy and favorable tolerability profile demonstrated in earlier trials with nilotinib as second-line therapy for the treatment of CML-CP. The frequency of adverse events among these heavily pretreated patients is low and similar to patients who failed imatinib only.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4267-4267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos A. Doti ◽  
German R Stemmelin ◽  
Elena Beatriz Moiraghi ◽  
María Gabriela Flores ◽  
Juan Garcia ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Since the introduction of Imatinib (IM), the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) experienced its most important change. As this drug became the first line for the treatment of CML, we learned that under-dosing was associated with a delay in achieving cytogenetic response and the development of acquired resistance. Last year we presented a case-control study that analyzed how compliance affects the cytogenetic response to Imatinib. This is an update of that data. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four patients with newly diagnosed Ph (+) chronic phase CML (CP-CML) were included and followed for 24 months. Patients received 400mg of IM and were asked to note down all taken doses, and reasons for non-compliance. Follow up visits were scheduled every 28–30 days and prescriptions were filled in order to last for only 30 days. During each visit, the medication was counted and non-adherence reasons were determined. Adverse events were graded according to the CTC and modifications in the Imatinib dose were only allowed with related adverse events with a CTC score ≥3. As a control group, we matched each case with a Phi + CP-CML patient from our data base of the same sex and similar age as the case patient. All control patients had to have complete information about dosing and response. They all received initial treatment with IM 400mg; thereafter, dose was adjusted according to each physician’s criteria. Compliance was measured as: mg prescribed/mg taken during the study period. Results: Twenty-four patients, 14 males median age 56 yo (range: 24–83), were included in the study. Three were lost to follow up, leaving only twenty-one for analysis of compliance. At the end of the first year, all patients had complete hematological response. Compliance during these 12 months was 96.1, which is clearly superior to the 80% reported in the setting of clinical trials. All patients had a complete hematological response, 89.9 achieved a major cytogenetic response (MCyR) and 87.4 a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), compared to 60 of the control group with a MCyR (p=0.027) and 57.8 a CCyR (p=0.025). During the second year, four patients lost CCyR, three responded to an increase in IM dose and one progressed to an accelerated phase and died. Compliance fell slightly during this period to 90.86% which was reflected in 81.66% CCyR, which was still statistically higher than the 54% of major responses in the control group (p=0.033). In both groups, none of the patients not achieving MCyR at 12 months achieved MCyR at 24 months. Hematological toxicity was more frequently observed within the first 6 months of treatment and after the increase in dosage. Severity and incidence of adverse events were similar in both groups, and were the main reasons for interruption or reduction of IM dose in the control group. The only additional difference besides compliance between the two groups was the average IM dose prescribed during the duration of the study (cases group: 430mg – control group: 330mg). Conclusions: Adherence to Imatinib is associated with an improvement in cytogenetic response that can be seen even at two years after the start of therapy. Since outcome and development of resistance seem to be associated with compliance to therapy, emphasis should be put on maintaining treatment at an adequate dose for as long as possible.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7057-7057
Author(s):  
P. D. Le Coutre ◽  
F. Giles ◽  
A. Hochhaus ◽  
J. F. Apperley ◽  
G. Ossenkoppele ◽  
...  

7057 Background: Nilotinib is a potent and highly selective BCR-ABL inhibitor approved for the treatment of Ph+ CML patients (pts) in chronic phase or AP who are resistant or intolerant to prior therapy including IM. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nilotinib (400 mg bid) in CML-AP pts resistant or intolerant to IM. Methods: Primary endpoint was confirmed hematologic response (HR). Secondary endpoints included major cytogenetic response (MCyR), time to progression, overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: 137 CML-AP pts (80% IM-resistant; 20% IM-intolerant with resistance) with minimum follow-up of 11 months (mos) (median age, 57 years; median duration of prior IM treatment, 28 mos) were included. IM-intolerant pts were also IM-resistant and without MCyR at study entry. 79% pts had prior IM ≥600 mg/day. Median dose intensity of nilotinib was 775 mg/day and median duration of exposure was 272 days. 56% had confirmed HR and 31% had complete hematologic response (CHR). 30% of IM-resistant and 37% of IM-intolerant pts achieved CHR. Responses were rapid, with a median time to first HR of 1 mo. HRs were durable at 24 mos with 54% of pts maintaining their response. MCyR was achieved in 32% of pts (30% in IM-resistant, 41% in IM-intolerant) and complete cytogenetic response in 20% of pts (18% in IM-resistant, 30% in IM-intolerant). Cytogenetic responses were also durable with 70% of pts maintaining MCyR at 24 mos; 83% of pts maintained CCyR at 12 mos. Estimated OS at 24 mos was 67%. Only 9% of pts discontinued therapy due to drug-related adverse events (AE). The most frequently reported grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities were thrombocytopenia (41%), neutropenia (42%), anemia (25%), elevated serum lipase (18%), and hypophosphatemia (14%). The rates of grade 3/4 myelosuppression were low, predictable, and easily managed with median onset of 14 to 29 days and median duration of 8 to 26 days. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic AEs were rare (< 1%) and included nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea. Conclusions: These long-term follow-up results confirm that nilotinib induces rapid and durable responses in CML-AP pts who failed prior IM due to intolerance or resistance, with a favorable risk/benefit. [Table: see text]


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4290-4290
Author(s):  
Vineet Talwar ◽  
Dinesh Bhurani ◽  
Dinesh Chandra Doval ◽  
Ajay Kumar Sharma

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Dasatinib is a novel, oral, multitargeted kinase inhibitor of BCR-ABL and SRC family kinases. It is structurally unrelated to imatinib, binding to the oncologically relevant catalytically active conformation of BCR ABL. It is active against all tested BCR ABL mutations except T315I that confer Imatinib resistance. AIM: Primary Aim: Survival with Dasatinib. Secondary Aim: Toxicity profile of Dasatinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 12 patients were included in this study with a median age of 40 years. Five patients were male and seven female. The median duration, since starting therapy for CML was 58.9 months. The median duration since start of treatment with dasatinib was 9.5 months. Out of the 12 patients, 9 were in chronic phase (75%) and 3 were in myeloid blast crisis (25%). Amongst these, 8 patients (66.7%) had taken prior imatinib therapy for more than 3 years. The dose of prior imatinib therapy ranged from 400 mg in patients of chronic phase to upto 800mg in blast crisis patients. For inclusion in the study, patients were required to have adequate hepatic and renal function and eastern co-operative oncology group (ECOG) performance score of 2 or lower. Exclusion criteria included previous dasatinib therapy, significant cardiovascular disease or significant bleeding disorder unrelated to CML. Imatinib failure was defined as progression from chronic phase to blast crisis while receiving 400mg/day or more imatinib or from accelerated phase to blast crisis while receiving 600mg/day or more imatinib. The hematology and cytogenetic responses were accessed as per standard criteria. RESULTS: A total number of 12 patients were enrolled in this pilot study out of which 7 are still on therapy. 5 patients discontinued therapy due to death. The median duration of dasatinib therapy was 7.5 months. The longest follow up patient on therapy being 20 months. The median daily dasatinib dose was 100mg. Nine patients (75%) had a major hematologic response and three patients (25%) had minor hematologic response. Dasatinib induced a major cytogenetic response in 5 (41.7%) patients, minor cytogenetic response in 1 (8.5%) patients, and minimal cytogenetic response in 4 (33.3%) patients. No cytogenetic response was seen in 2 patients of blast crisis. The median duration of survival was not achieved till August 2008. The one year survival by Kaplan-Meier method is 64% (1 month – 19 months). Dasatinib had a favorable toxicity profile. Among the non hematologic events, the most frequent adverse events were diarrhea (3/12), vomiting (3/12), peripheral edema (4/12), arthralgia (3/12), fatigue (5/12), rash (3/12), epistaxis (2/12), fever (1/12) and headache (2/12). Dose interruption was required for one patient with pleural effusion which was reversible with diuretics and steroids. No patients had grade 4 toxicity. The cytopenias were generally reversible and could be managed effectively by dose interruption or reduction. Since these patients had prior therapy with imatinib, assessment of relative contribution of therapy to myelosuppression could be a confounding factor. CONCLUSION: Dasatinib induced hematologic and cytogenetic response in majority of patients who had progressed on imatinib therapy. Dasatinib has a favorable toxicity profile. The hematologic and non hematologic adverse events could be managed with dose alterations. It presents a potentially new therapeutic option for patients with imatinib failure or intolerance.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1649-1649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Latagliata ◽  
Imma Attolico ◽  
Malgorzata Monika Trawinska ◽  
Isabella Capodanno ◽  
Mario Annunziata ◽  
...  

Background Bosutinib is a 2nd generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) active in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) patients resistant or intolerant to frontline imatinib, dasatinib or nilotinib; the favourable toxicity profile makes bosutinib potentially useful in elderly patients, but at present there are no data in unselected cohorts of these subjects. Aim To highlight this issue, a real-life cohort of 91 patients followed in 21 Italian Centers and treated with bosutinib when aged > 65 years was retrospectively evaluated. Patients The main clinical features of the whole cohort at diagnosis and at baseline of bosutinib treatment are reported in the Table; all patients were in CP when bosutinib was started. Median interval from diagnosis to bosutinib treatment was 49.7 months [interquartile range (IQR) 14.2 - 117.5]. Results Starting dose of bosutinib was 500 mg/day in 20 patients (22.0%), 400 mg/day in 7 patients (7.7%), 300 mg/day in 28 patients (30.8%), 200 mg/day in 34 patients (37.3%) and 100 mg/day in 2 patients (2.2%), respectively. After a median period of treatment of 18.1 months (IQR 9.4 - 27.7) all patients were evaluable for toxicity; on the whole, all grade hematological and extra-hematological toxicities were reported in 12/91 (13.1%) and 45/91 (49.4%) patients, respectively. A grade 3 - 4 hematological toxicity occurred in 5/91 patients (5.4%); a grade 3 - 4 extra-hematological toxicity occurred in 16/91 patients (17.5%). Overall, 46 patients (50.5%) never discontinued bosutinib: a temporary discontinuation < 6 weeks was needed in 19 patients (20.9%) and a temporary discontinuation > 6 weeks in 2 patients (2.2%). A permanent bosutinib discontinuation was needed in the remaining 24 patients (26.4%): in particular, 11 patients (12.1%) permanently discontinued bosutinib due to toxicity (skin rash in 3 cases, gastro-intestinal toxicity in 3 cases, pleural effusion in 2 cases, transaminitis, QTc prolongation and myalgia in 1 case each), 6 patients (6.6%) due to resistance and 7 patients (7.7%) due to other reasons (unrelated death in 6 cases and patient decision in 1 case). As to response, 5 patients (5.5%) were considered too early for assessment (< 3 months of treatment); among the 86 patients evaluable for response, 11 patients (12.7%) did not have any response (including 6 patients who discontinued bosutinib for early toxicity), 4 (4.6%) achieved hematological response only, and 71 (82.5%) achieved Cytogenetic Response (CyR) (Major CyR in 4, Complete CyR in 67). Among the 67 patients in Complete CyR, 58 (67.4% of all 86 evaluable patients) also achieved Molecular Response (MR) [Major MR (MR 3.0) in 19 (22.1%), Deep MR (MR 4.0/4.5) in 39 (45.3%)]. The 3-year Overall Survival and Event-Free Survival of the whole cohort of patients from bosutinib start were 83.0% (CI95% 71.6 - 94.4) (Figure 1) and 59.5% (CI95% 39.9 - 72.1), respectively. Conclusions Our real-life data show that bosutinib is effective, even if initial doses in many cases were lower than recommended, with a favourable safety profile also in elderly patients with important comorbidities resistant/intolerant to previous TKI treatments,: as a consequence, it could play a significant role in the current clinical practise for these frail patients. Disclosures Latagliata: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Trawinska:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Annunziata:Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Elena:Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Crugnola:Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Bonifacio:Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Sgherza:Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Iurlo:Pfizer: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Incyte: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Novartis: Other: Speaker Honoraria. Breccia:Celgene: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4564-4564
Author(s):  
Bruno Martino ◽  
Giovanna Rege Cambrin ◽  
Antonella Gozzini ◽  
Fabio Stagno ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
...  

Abstract Dasatinib(SPRYCEL®) is a kinase inhibitor active against BCR-ABL and SRC family kinases. A phase I trial of dasatinib has shown CHR and MCyR at total daily doses of 100 mg and 140 mg daily in both BID and once daily (QD) schedule in CML-CP patients (pts). Phase II studies of dasatinib have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of a 70 mg twice daily (BID) dose in CML-CP pts with resistance or intolerance to imatinib. We analyzed safety and adverse events (AE) data in 27 pts with CML (CP), imatinib resistant (85%) or intolerant (15%), who have been treated with dasatinib from May 2006 to July 2007 in a compassionate use in Italy. A possible relationship of AE observed during dasatinib with imatinib toxicity and previous types of treatment was analyzed. Median age was 52 years at diagnosis and 58,6 years at start of dasatinib. Sokal was low in 22%, intermediate in 33%, high in 15%, not available in 30%. The median time from CML diagnosis to enrollment in the compassionate use was 78 months. Imatinib dosage, administered during the previous 3 months, was 400 mg/d in 40% of pts, 400–600 mg/d in 50% and >600 mg/d in 10% . Prior treatment for CML included interferon alpha in 48%, chemotherapy in 18%, nilotinib in 18% of the cases and stem cell transplant (SCT) in 1 case. Additional chromosome anomalies and mutations were observed in 18% and 55% of cases, respectively. Dasatinib was administered 70 mg BID, and dose escalation to 100 mg BID and reduction to 50 mg BID or 40 mg BID were allowed for inadequate response or AE. Hematological toxicity during imatinib treatment was reported in 55% of the cases as first episode, and 30% as second episode; extrahematological toxicity was also 55%. Following dasatinib treatment, 70% of the patients had some degree of hematologic toxicity with 21 events. 95% of these AE occurred in the first 2 months of treatment, with 80% in the first month. A second episode of hematolological toxicity was observed in 26% of the cases between months 2 and 15 (median mo. 5). Overall, neutropenia was observed in 11 patients (grade 4 in 5), thromobocytopenia in 11(grade 3 or less) and anemia in 4(grade 4 in one).13 patients have complained of non. hematological toxicity, with 15 AE with grade >2 occurring in the first 40 days. Further AEs were rare and non clinically relevant. The only grade 4 AE was pulmonary oedema; grade 3 AE were fever, arthralgia, liver toxicity, fluid retention; one grade 2 pleural effusion was reported. 48% of cases reduced dosage, whereas only one increased due to lack of response: this patient is now undergoing an allogeneic SCT One patient died, after stop for fluid retention, because of sepsis. All the other patients are still on therapy with a follow-up ranging from 2 to 15 months (median 6 mo). Hematological toxicity during dasatinib was not related to the number of previous treatments and to the time on imatinib. In conclusion, therapy with dasatinib is generally well tolerated, and side effects are reduced by a correct use and clinical surveillance of the patients; in addition, we found that both hematological and extrahematological toxicities decline with time and are not related to the previous treatment.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4561-4561
Author(s):  
Bettina A. Gunawardena ◽  
Sarah Schlief ◽  
Wolfram Dempke ◽  
Bernd Wnterhalter

Abstract Background: Dasatinib is a potent orally active, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that blocks signal transduction pathways implicated in the proliferation and survival of tumor cells. A European compassionate use trial was conducted to provide dasatinib to patients (pts) who were ineligible to be enrolled into the START-trials. Methods: From April 2006 to February 2007, 26 pts were included in Germany. Diagnosis at inclusion: 9 Ph+ALL, 6 CML in accelerated phase, 5 CML in myeloid blast crisis, 2 biphenotypic Ph+ALL and 1 chronic phase CML. Additionally, 3 pts with systemic mastocytosis (SM), refractory to imatinib due to D816V mutation were also included. Pts had previously failed several chemotherapy regimens, including imatinib and/or nilotinib. Sixty-one percent were resistant, 35% were refractory and 4% intolerant to imatinib/nilotinib. Results: Of 26 patients, there were 17 male and 9 female pts. The median age was 56 years (range, 22–80 years). The average daily dose of dasatinib was 137 mg with a median duration of therapy of 69.5d (range 3–252d). Six (23%) pts required transient treatment interruption, 2 (8%) due to non-haematological toxicity (dyspnea and increased hepatic values), 4 (15%) due to haematological toxicities. Twenty-one pts discontinued therapy for the following reasons: study related toxicity (23%), SCT (15%), death (8%), lost to follow-up (11%) and patient’s wish (4%). Two patients still remain on therapy. The response rate was CHR in 42%, complete (CCyR) cytogenetic response in 19%, and PCyR in 4% of the pts. For patients with diagnosed SM one partial HR, one stable disease and one progression have been recorded. Disease progression occurred in 19% of cases. Adverse events were transient and generally mild to moderate in severity. Generally, the observed AE profile was similar to that seen in previous research trials. For all pts, the most common hematological side-effects Grade 3/4 AEs reported were thrombocytopenia (23%), neutropenia (4%), and anemia (4%). Most frequent non-hematological side-effects included dyspnea in 23% of pts (no grade 3–4), edema in 23% (grade 3, 8%), diarrhea in 15% (grade 3, 4%), headache in 15% (no grade 3–4), bone and neck pain in 11% (grade 3, 8%) and pleural effusion in 8% (grade 3, 4%). Conclusions: Dasatinib therapy appeared to be effective and was well tolerated in this difficult to treat patient population.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5173-5173
Author(s):  
Tarcila S Datoguia ◽  
Hugo R C Silva ◽  
Amauri M C R Junior ◽  
José Salvador Oliveira ◽  
Monika Conchon

Abstract Introduction Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is known to be a myeloproliferative neoplasm that involves a genetic abnormality defined as Philadelphia chromosome. Part of chromosome 9 becomes attached to chromosome 22, forming the BCR-ABL fusion gene, which is an oncogenic tyrosine kinase. The rise of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has transformed the outcome of CML. Imatinib was the first TKI approved for treating patients diagnosed with CML in 2001. Dasatinib and Nilotinib were accredited as second-line therapy in 2006 and 2007, respectively, for patients who had failed previous therapy. Although these new drugs improved response compared with imatinib, they also have important side effects that can lead to non-adherence to treatment. Given the importance to maintain regular treatment to avoid disease progression, this paper aims to discuss the drug toxicities in patients undergoing second-line therapy. Patients and methods This study was an observational analysis using medical records in Santa Marcelina Hospital, a public service located in São Paulo, Brazil. Results A total of 58 CML patients taking second-line therapy were included, 28 with dasatinib and 30 with nilotinib. In dasatinib group, only 3 patients were diagnosed accelerated phase and each one had different side effects, as hematological toxicity, pleural effusion and ulcerative colitis. Of 25 chronic phase patients taking dasatinib, 12 (48%) presented with clinical and laboratorial abnormalities: 3.5% had hematological toxicity (2% with severe bleeding), 4% had cutaneous rash, 10.7% with ulcerative colitis (confirmed in bowel biopsy) and 18% developed pleural effusion. 25% of all dasatinib patient with side effects lost molecular response and started a third TKI. In nilotinib cohort, 7 patients were diagnosed with CML accelerated phase and only two developed liver toxicity. 23 patients were chronic phase and 60% presented with several side effects: 3% hypertriglyceridemia, 6% had hematological toxicity, 6% with dyspepsia, 10% had cutaneous rash and 27% presented with higher liver transaminase. 7% of all nilotinib patients who developed side effects lost molecular response and had to discontinue therapy. Discussion Several examples of side effects can be described with all TKI including cytopenias, fatigue, pain, fluid retention, GI disorders, skin complains, cardiac and liver toxicities but grade 3-4 occurs in less than 2-3% of patients as Jabour et al reported. Despite of important adverse effects, dasatinib and nilotinib induce rapid and durable hematologic and cytogenetic response. In general, the most related toxicities are self-limited and manageable as Kantarjian related. Comparisons between these two second-line therapy using intolerance criteria can be difficult to represent because studies published until now have two different types of population in terms of cytogenetic response achieved previously with imatinib, for example. So, to have a successful treatment, it is important to consider other variables as comorbidities and mutational status as referred Mathisen et al. Individualized risk assessment, between CML and patients characteristics, should influence treatment choices and clinical management. In conclusion, the efficacy and safety of dasatinib and nilotinib have been confirmed by long-term outcome. Clearly these drugs have unique pharmacologic profiles and response patterns in every single patient, but the goal of treating these patients is the correct management of adverse events without losing molecular response. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5448-5448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanchana Chansung ◽  
Chittima Sirijerachai ◽  
Arnuparp Lekhakula ◽  
Pongtep Viboonjuntra ◽  
Pimjai Niparuck ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Nilotinib, a second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was proved to have high efficacy on treatment of Philadelphia chromosome positive CML patients who failed or were intolerant to imatinib. Limited data was available on its efficacy and safety in Asian population. Methods: Chronic phase CML patients who have failure, suboptimal response or intolerance to imatinib according to ELN 2009 guideline were treated with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily on 7 centers in Thailand. Prospective data collection for 24 months was performed. Results: There were 106 cases participated in this study, 2 cases with initial T315I mutation were excluded from the study, total 104 cases were analysed. The median age was 46 (16-79) years with a slight male predominance over female at the ratio of 1.4:1 respectively. Twenty five percent received imatinib less than 12 months whilst 20% received imatinib longer than 60 months. The median duration of the prior imatinib treatment was 18 months (2-142 months). Best response to imatinib treatment were major molecular response (MMR) 5.8%, complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) 26%, major cytogenetic response (MCyR) 12.5%, complete hematologic response (CHR) 47%, and no CHR 8.7%. The reasons for nilotinib switching were imatinib failure 65%, imatinib intolerance 28%, imatinib suboptimal response 7%. Sixty-eight percent were completed 24 months follow up. Of those, 32% early discontinued treatment mostly because of unsatisfactory results or adverse events. Two patients died of infection and CNS bleeding during the study period. Evaluation were made every 3 months based on ELN 2009 criteria . Best response to nilotinib treatment included MMR 57%, CCyR 16%, MCyR 6%, CHR 16%, and no CHR 5%. At 3 months, 91%, 35%, and 14% of the patients CHR,CCyR, and MMR, respectively. Achieving CCyR or MMR at 3 months predicted a chance of achieving MMR (P= 0.00001) Those who did not achieve at least CHR at 3 months never achieved MMR, while 86 % of those who achieved CCyR at 3 months achieved MMR and 100% of those achieving MMR at 3 months had sustained MMR throughout the study period (24 months). Imatinib suboptimal response had significantly better outcome as compared to imatinib failure and imatinib intolerance group (P = 0.017). All of suboptimal response cases achieved CCyR , 86% achieved MMR, no early discontinue treatment in this group. While 75% of failure group achieved CCyR, 62% achieved MMR and 62% of intolerance group achieved CCyR, 38% achieved MMR. The reason for poorer response of intolerance group was high rate of early discontinue due to side effects, 17% vs 5% in the imatinib failure group. Initial BCR-ABL mutation analysis was performed on 90 cases, mutations were found on 16 cases, 2 of them were T315I which were excluded from the study. The cases with mutation significantly had poorer response to treatment than those without mutation (P = 0.001). There was one case with initial G250E mutation, who developed T315I mutation after treatment with nilotinib. At 24 months, 1 case progressed to accelerated phase and 3 cases progressed to blastic transformation. The 2-year progression-free survival and 2-year overall survival was 96% and 98%, respectively. Skin rash, musculoskeletal pain, and infection were the three most common non-hematologic adverse events found in 18%, 13%, and 6% of the patients, respectively; however, most of them were grade 1-2, except for 4 cases with grade 3-4 infections .Grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events included thrombocytopenia (12%), neutropenia (11%), anemia (5%), and leucopenia (4%); and most of them were manageable. Although biochemical abnormalities were commonly found, most of them were mild. Grade 3-4 events found were hypophosphatemia (6%), hyperglycemia (4%), and elevated serum lipase (4%). Only 10 cases (9%) permanently discontinued nilotinib due to its adverse effects. Conclusions: Nilotinib, as a second line treatment for Thai patients with chronic phase CML showed excellent efficacy and tolerability. Indication for nilotinib treatment, initial mutation status and depth of response at 3 months after treatment can predict outcomes of the patients. Author contact: KanchanaChansung M.D. Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khonkaen University, Khonkaen, Thailand e-mail: [email protected] Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document