Statin Use Improves Overall Survival and Time to Treatment Failure in Patients with Primary CNS Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2496-2496
Author(s):  
Lauren Ciminello ◽  
Christiana Toomey ◽  
Julien Cobert ◽  
Fred H Hochberg ◽  
Jeremy S. Abramson ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2496 Poster Board II-473 Background: HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) have been used to treat hypercholesterolemia and hyperlipidemia for over 20 years. Statins competitively inhibit HMG-CoA reductase thereby blocking the synthesis of mevalonate. They directly inhibit synthesis of steroid hormones and cholesterol but also indirectly inhibit prenylation and ubiqitination. As all currently marketed statins are lipophillic, with the exception of Pravachol (pravastatin), several therapeutic trials have attempted to exploit these indirect actions to treat both neoplastic (glioblastoma, anaplastic astrocytoma) and degenerative (Alzheimer's, Parkinson's) neurologic disease. We studied the impact of incidentally prescribed statins on high-risk patients with primary central nervous system diffuse large B cell lymphoma (PCNSL). Methods: We used an IRB-approved clinicopathologic database, derived from comprehensive tumor registry data at the Massachusetts General Hospital, to identify all patients diagnosed with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) between 1991 and 2007 (n=118). We excluded pediatric patients, patients who did not receive curative treatment and patients who failed to achieve a CR with initial therapy. Automated analysis of billing and medication administration records was used to identify the administration of statins to these patients. We compared the outcome of patients who were receiving statins to controls with PCNSL who did not receive statins. We excluded patients who did not receive statins within the time interval from 6 months prior to 2 years after their PCNSL diagnosis. As only a single statin pt was less than 50 we excluded all pts below this age from the cases and controls. All patients received high dose MTX based therapy. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of first methotrexate. Results: Median age of statin patients was 66 yrs (range 52 – 76); median age of controls was 66 years (range 50 - 86). Nine patients were on atorvastatin, 9 were on simvastatin, 1 each were on pravastatin, rosuvastatin and fluvastatin. At a median follow-up of 47.5 months, concurrent statin therapy was associated with improved OS (62% vs. 37%)(p=0.04 Log-rank test). The median OS for all statin patients > 50 years old (n=21) was 60 months versus 37 months for all other patients > 50 years old (n=67) (p=<0.005 t-test two tailed). Conclusions: Concurrent prescription of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors is associated with improved outcome in patients with high risk PCNSL compared to controls. Prospective controlled trials will be required to validate this observation. Disclosures: Hochberg: Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Biogen-Idec: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Enzon: Speakers Bureau.

1998 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1030-1043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen S Yee ◽  
Nancy T Fong

OBJECTIVE: To review the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in the treatment of dyslipidemias. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (January 1960–April 1998), Current Contents search, additional references listed in articles, and unpublished data obtained from the manufacturer were used to identify data from scientific literature. Studies evaluating atorvastatin (i.e., abstracts, clinical trials, proceedings, data on file with the manufacturer) were considered for inclusion. STUDY SELECTION: English-language literature was reviewed to evaluate the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, therapeutic use, and adverse effects of atorvastatin. Additional relevant citations were used in the introductory material and discussion. DATA EXTRACTION: Open and controlled animal and human clinical studies published in the English-language literature were reviewed and evaluated. Clinical trials selected for inclusion were limited to those in human subjects and included data from animals if human data were not available. DATA SYNTHESIS: Atorvastatin is a recent hydroxymethylglutarylcoenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia, mixed dyslipidemias, and homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. In patients who have not met the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal as recommended by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II guidelines, atorvastatin 10–80 mg/d may be used as monotherapy or as an adjunct to other lipid-lowering agents and dietary modifications. In placebo-controlled clinical trials, atorvastatin 10–80 mg/d lowered LDL-C by 35–61% and triglyceride (TG) concentrations by 14–45%. In comparative trials, atorvastatin 10–80 mg/d showed a greater reduction of serum total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, TG concentrations, and apolipoprotein B-100 (apo B) compared with pravastatin, simvastatin, or lovastatin. In comparison, currently available HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (lovastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, cerivastatin) lower LDL-C concentrations by approximately 20–40% and TG concentrations by approximately 10–30%. In pooled placebo-controlled clinical trials of up to a duration of 52 weeks, atorvastatin in dosages up to 80 mg/d appeared to be well tolerated. The most common adverse effect of atorvastatin was gastrointestinal upset. The incidence of elevated serum hepatic transaminases may be greater at higher dosages of atorvastatin. The risk of myopathy and/or rhabdomyolysis is increased when an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor is taken concomitantly with cyclosporine, gemfibrozil, niacin, erythromycin, or azole antifungals. CONCLUSIONS: Atorvastatin appears to reduce TC, LDL-C, TG concentrations, and apo B to a greater extent than do currently available HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Atorvastatin may be preferred in patients requiring greater than a 30% reduction in LDL-C or in patients with both elevated LDL-C and TG concentrations, which may obviate the need for combination lipid-lowering therapy. Adverse effects of atorvastatin appear to be similar to those of other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and should be routinely monitored. Long-term safety data (>1 y) on atorvastatin compared with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are still needed. Cost-effectiveness studies comparing atorvastatin with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors remain a subject for further investigation. Published clinical studies evaluating the impact of atorvastatin on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are still needed. Additionally, clinical studies evaluating the impact of lipid-lowering therapy in a larger number of women, the elderly (>70 y), and patients with diabetes for treatment of primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease are needed.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4227-4227
Author(s):  
Estrella Carrillo ◽  
Nancy Rodriguez ◽  
Juan Francisco Dominguez ◽  
Jose Gonzalez ◽  
Jose Francisco Falantes ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4227 Background Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) of adults is an infrequent and heterogeneous disease according to presentation pattern, prognosis and treatment. It is widely assumed that age above 30 years, leukocytosis >25 ×109/L, central nervous system involvement and specific cytogenetic disorders such as t(9;22) or MLL rearrangement entail bad prognosis. There are controversial studies on the impact of intensification chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) on survival of these high-risk groups. Aims To identify biological, clinical and prognostic characteristics in adult ALL patients diagnosed and followed in a single center throughout 40 years as long as the impact on clinical outcome of different consecutive therapeutic approaches, including HSCT, in different periods. Patients and methods Throughout 1970 to 2011, 230 patients were prospectively registered and retrospectively analyzed. Most patients accomplishing pre-determined criteria received treatment according to PETHEMA or locally developed therapeutic protocols (including HSCT in relapse high-risk patients, since 1978). Critical variables at diagnosis such as age, gender, phenotype (from 1978), cytogenetic (from 1999), white blood cells count (WBC) and central nervous system involvement, were analyzed. Response to induction chemotherapy, relapse rate (RR) and 5 year overall survival (OS) were analyzed in the whole cohort and separately by decade when treatment protocols were different. The clinical impact of HSCT was analyzed on a subgroup of patients homogeneously treated since 1994. Statistical analysis was performed by mean of Chi-square and Kaplan Meier tests, as appropriate. Outcome Table 1 summarizes the presentation pattern and its prognostic value. At diagnosis features such male gender, age above 30 years, central nervous system involvement, leukocytosis >10×109/L, MLL rearrangement, t(9:22) and complex karyotype entailed a worse prognosis. For the whole cohort the 5 years OS was 30%. CR was achieved in 73% and the RR was 38%. 5 years OS has improved by decades: 11% in the 70s, 24% in the 80s, 30% in the 90s, and 41% in XXI century (p<0,01). Patients selected for intensive chemotherapeutic protocols achieved a similar CR rate in each decade (nearly 80%) while the RR decreased through the years (70s: 68%, 80s: 44%, 90: 42%, 00–11: 25%; p<0,01). Patients treated with chemotherapy plus HSCT achieved in 5 years (from 1994) an OS of 69% in comparison with the 30% obtained in those patients who only received chemotherapy (p<0,01). Conclusion Male gender, age above 30, WBC >10×10e9/L, t(9;22), MLL-rearrangement, complex karyotype and CNS involvement conferred poor prognosis in adult ALL. Intensification of chemotherapeutic regimens produced a progressive decrease in relapse rate, leading to an improvement in overall survival over the years. HSCT seems to partially overcome the poor prognosis related to high risk factors. Disclosures: Perez-Simón: Janssen-Cilag: Patents & Royalties.


CHEST Journal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 556A
Author(s):  
Leonardo Seoane ◽  
Katheryn Sison ◽  
Marianne Billeter ◽  
Teresa Nash

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document