Multicenter Retrospective Study on the Development of Peripheral Lymphocytosis During Second-Line Dasatinib Therapy for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Abstract Abstract 2275 Background: Dasatinib is known to induce large granular lymphocyte (LGL) expansion, which correlates with better clinical efficacy. The current retrospective study attempted to investigate the incidence of lymphocytosis following second-line dasatinib therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and to analyze the clinical factors predictive of the development of lymphocytosis, as well as association with treatment outcomes. Method: Fifty CML patients who failed imatinib treatment and received dasatinib for 3 months or more, were enrolled from 9 centers in the Republic of Korea. The cumulative incidence of lymphocytosis was assessed, and cytogenetic and molecular response, treatment failure, loss of response, progression to advanced disease, and survival were evaluated and analyzed according to the development of lymphocytosis. Results: After a median of 17 months of dasatinib therapy, complete cytogenetic (CCR) and major molecular response (MMR) was noted in 23 and 16 patients, respectively. Twenty three patients (46%) developed lymphocytosis following dasatinib therapy (median onset 4 months). No clinical predictive factor for the development of lymphocytosis was found. The cytogenetic response was significantly better in the group that developed lymphocytosis (LC+), as compared to the group without lymphocytosis (LC-); the LC+ group showed a higher complete cytogenetic response (CCyR; 78.3% vs. 29.6%, p=0.001) and major molecular response (MMR; 52.2% vs. 14.8%, p=0.005), in comparison to the LC- group. The development of lymphocytosis after dasatinib was identified as a favorable independent marker for predicting a CCyR (p=0.002) or MMR following dasatinib therapy (p=0.003). Conclusion: The present study suggested that 1) lymphocytosis following dasatinib therapy is not rare phenomenon with incidence of 46%; 2) it might be associated with higher response following dasatinib therapy. Further study is necessary to identify which subset of lymphocytes was expanded and to reveal the exact mechanism by which dasatinib induces lymphocyte expansion. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

The Impact of Cytogenetic Response At 6 Months of Therapy in Global Survival of Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Imatinib in the South of Brazil

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.4453.4453 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 4453-4453

Author(s):

Laura Fogliatto ◽

Marcelo Capra ◽

Mariza Schaan ◽

Mario Sérgio Fernandes ◽

Tito Vanelli Costa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Imatinib Therapy ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Imatinib Treatment ◽

Major Molecular Response ◽

Global Survival ◽

The Impact

Abstract Abstract 4453 Background Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib leads to disease remission in a majority of patient, but in some patients (pts) controlling the disease remains a challenge. One of the proposed prognostic factors for identifying this subset of pts is the treatment response in the first months of therapy. Objectives We conducted a study to evaluate the importance of the early complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and the factors associated with its achievement. Methods This is a retrospective study in a cohort of pts with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) enrolled in 3 Hematology centers in South Brazil. All pts received imatinib 400mg as first or second-line therapy. Early-imatinib treatment was considered when imatinib started before 12 months (mo) from diagnosis. Patient evaluation and response criteria followed the ELN recommendations. The ACE-27 (Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27) is a 27 item comorbidity index for patients with cancer and assign weights from 1 to 3 based on the dysfunction grade of each condition (mild, moderate and severe, respectively). An ACE-27 score was applied to each patient. Imatinib suspensions were considered if superior to 20 days at any point during therapy. Global survival (GS) was measured from the start of imatinib to the date of death from any cause. Results We analyzed data from 181 pts with CP-CML diagnosed since 1990. The median age at diagnosis was 48 yr (4 – 85) and 55% were male. The median time from diagnosis to imatinib was 7 mo (0 – 178) and 71% pts were early-imatinib treated. Prior therapy with interferon was used in 60% pts. The median of follow-up was 47 mo. With 6 months of imatinib therapy, 123 pts (68%) achieved CCyR, in this group the four year global survival was 97%. 58 (32%) were not in CCyR at 6 months of therapy, in this group the four year GS was 87%. This difference was significant (P=.024; Figure 1). The chance of achieving major molecular response (MMR) during follow up was 79% for the pts with CCyR at 6 months compared to 53% for the group with no CCyR at 6 months (P<0,001). Some factors were associated with reduced chance of CCyR at 6 months. In a multivariate analysis, the pts with late-onset imatinib treatment (more than 12 mo from diagnosis) had a CCyR rate of 31%, in contrast, the pts who started imatinib before 12 mo had a rate of 50% (P=0,02). The pts with good adherence to treatment had greater CCyR rate than those with poor adherence (interruption greater than 20 days), 51,4% and 35%, respectively (P=0,04). Comorbidity measured by ACE-27 score also influenced the CCyR rates at 6 months: 54% of score 0 (no comorbidity) patients achieved CCyR, compared to 30% of pts with score 1 (mild comorbidity), 33% of pts with score 2 (moderate) and 47% of pts with score 3 (severe) (P=0,009). The greater CCyR rate in the severe comorbidity group probably lacks significance due to the reduced number of pts in this group (22). Conclusions A great proportion of pts achieve CCyR after 6 months of imatinib therapy, nevertheless, the pts who achieve CCyR by 6 months of therapy have greater proportion of major molecular response and global survival. Imatinib therapy should be started as soon as possible and additional efforts must be taken to avoid nonadherence. Finally, special attention should be given to pts with comorbidities as their results tend to be worse. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

The Role of Early Cytogenetic Response in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Imatinib and the Impact of Adherence and Comorbidities

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.4423.4423 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 4423-4423

Author(s):

Laura Fogliatto ◽

Marcelo Capra ◽

Mariza Shaan ◽

Tito Vanelli Costa ◽

Mayde Seadi Torriani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Median Time ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Imatinib Therapy ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Imatinib Treatment ◽

Major Molecular Response ◽

Complete Cytogenetic Response

Abstract Abstract 4423 Background Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib leads to disease remission in a majority of patient, but in some patients (pts) controlling the disease remains a challenge. One of the proposed prognostic factors for identifying this subset of pts is the treatment response in the first months of therapy. Objectives We conducted a study to evaluate the importance of the early complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and the factors associated with its achievement. Methods This is a retrospective study in a cohort of pts with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) enrolled in 14 Hematology centers in South Brazil. All pts received imatinib 400mg as first or second-line therapy. Early-imatinib treatment was considered when imatinib started before 12 months (mo) from diagnosis. Patient evaluation and response criteria followed the ELN recommendations. The ACE-27 (Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27) is a 27 item comorbidity index for patients with cancer and assign weights from 1 to 3 based on the dysfunction grade of each condition (mild, moderate and severe, respectively). An ACE-27 score was applied to each patient. Imatinib suspensions were considered if superior to 20 days at any point during therapy. EFS was measured from the start of imatinib to the date of any of the following events while on therapy: death from any cause, loss of complete hematologic response, loss of complete cytogenetic response, discontinuation of therapy for toxicity or lack of efficacy, or progression to accelerated phase or blastic phase. Results We analyzed data from 450 pts with CP-CML diagnosed since 1990. The median age at diagnosis was 48 yr (4 – 85) and 55% were male. The median time from diagnosis to imatinib was 7 mo (0 – 178) and 71% pts were early-imatinib treated. Prior therapy with interferon was used in 60% pts. The median of follow-up was 47 mo. With 6 months of imatinib therapy, 198 pts (44%) achieved CCyR. In this group, the four year cumulative incidence of events was 33 (17%) and the EFS was 75,5%. 252 (56%) were not in CCyR at 6 months of therapy. In this group, a greater proportion of cumulative of events was observed: 86 (34%), and the EFS was 62,3%. This difference was significant (P=0,03; Figure 1). In this group of pts, 63% achieved CCyR after 6 months any time during follow up and the median time for CCyR in these pts was 17 months. The chance of achieving major molecular response (MMR) during follow up was 79% for the pts with CCyR at 6 months compared to 53% for the group with no CCyR at 6 months (P<0,001). Some factors were associated with reduced chance of CCyR at 6 months. In a multivariate analysis, the pts with late-onset imatinib treatment (more than 12 mo from diagnosis) had a CCyR rate of 31%, in contrast, the pts who started imatinib before 12 mo had a rate of 50% (P=0,02). The pts with good adherence to treatment had greater CCyR rate than those with poor adherence (interruption greater than 20 days), 51,4% and 35%, respectively (P=0,04). Comorbidity measured by ACE-27 score also influenced the CCyR rates at 6 months: 54% of score 0 (no comorbidity) patients achieved CCyR, compared to 30% of pts with score 1 (mild comorbidity), 33% of pts with score 2 (moderate) and 47% of pts with score 3 (severe) (P=0,009). The greater CCyR rate in the severe comorbidity group probably lacks significance due to the reduced number of pts in this group (22). Conclusions A great proportion of pts achieve CCyR after 6 months of imatinib therapy, nevertheless, the pts who achieve CCyR by 6 months of therapy have greater proportion of major molecular response and event-free survival. Imatinib therapy should be started as soon as possible and additional efforts must be taken to avoid nonadherence. Finally, special attention should be given to pts with comorbidities as their results tend to be worse. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Outcome of Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Recieved an Intermittent Imatinib Therapy.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v110.11.1034.1034 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 110 (11) ◽

pp. 1034-1034

Author(s):

Hyun-Gyung Goh ◽

Soo-Hyun Kim ◽

Jeong Lee ◽

Sae-Eun Jang ◽

Wan-Seok Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Oral Dose ◽

Median Duration ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Imatinib Therapy ◽

Intermittent Therapy ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Imatinib Treatment ◽

600Mg Daily

Abstract Diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is based on detection of the BCR-ABL gene or Philadelphia chromosome, and the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib has been the standard therapy for CML patients. Although imatinib therapy is effective in CML, it is still unclear whether imatinib can be safely discontinued without relapse. This study was designed to investigate the outcome of 26 CML patients after discontinuation of imatinib and to determine whether intermittent imatinib therapy can be employed in CML patients. Between May 2001 and Jun 2007, 555 patients have been treated with imatinib in St Mary’s Hospital of the Catholic University of Korea, and 26 patients discontinued imatinib when they achieved either complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) or complete molecular response (CMR). These 26 patients were diagnosed as Philadelphia positive (Ph+) CML between November 1995 and May 2002, and 22 patients were in chronic phase (CP) and 4 patients were in accelerated phase (AP) at diagnosis. The median age was 35 years (22–56), and 12 patients (46%) were female and 14 (54%) were male. Among 26 patients, 7 received interferon prior to imatinib therapy and 7 underwent SCT. Five patients received both interferon and SCT before imatinib therapy, and the remaining 7 patients received the imatinib as a front line therapy. Imatinib was started at oral dose of 400mg and 600mg daily for patients in CP and AP, respectively, and when they achieved CCyR or CMR, imatinib was discontinued after informed consent of the patient. In case of cytogenetic or molecular relapse, patients in all phases were retreated with imatinib at 400mg daily. Bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB) samples were obtained at regular intervals from diagnosis for hematologic response (HR), cytogenetic response (CyR) and molecular response (MR) monitorings. Eleven patients discontinued imatinib when they achieved CCyR, and 15 patients discontinued imatinib after achieving CMR. After the median duration of 7 month (4–48) observation without imatinib therapy, hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular relapses occurred in 4, 7 and 10 patients, respectively, and imatinib at oral dose of 400mg daily was reintroduced to all patients except 2 who continued to remain in CMR after imatinib discontinuation. Except 1 patient who expired and 2 patients who are in persistent molecular remission, all of 23 patients are maintaining the best response achieved after imatinib resumption with a median duration of 38 months (16–58). In conclusion, although imatinib cannot be discontinued completely, intermittent therapy can be considered for the treatment of CML patients. Intermittent imatinib treatment should not be restricted to CP patients who achieve CMR, and AP patients or patients with CCyR also can be considered for intermittent imatinib treatment. We will continue the follow-up of the patients enrolled in this study, and long-term study of intermittent imatinib treatment with expanded pool of patients will enable us to determine the accurate consequences of discontinuation of imatinib and intermittent imatinib treatment.

Download Full-text

Results of Imatinib Dose Escalation After 36 Months of Follow-up in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Failure or Sub-Optimal Response According to 2006 EuropeanLeukemia Net (ELN) Criteria.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3302.3302 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3302-3302

Author(s):

Massimo Breccia ◽

Fabio Stagno ◽

Roberto Latagliata ◽

Paolo Vigneri ◽

Laura Cannella ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Standard Dose ◽

Acquired Resistance ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Molecular Response

Abstract Abstract 3302 Poster Board III-190 Introduction Imatinib mesylate (IM) given at a daily dose of 400 mg currently represents the gold standard of care for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines propose IM dose escalation to rescue those CML patients with either suboptimal response or drug resistance. We report on the long-term efficacy of IM dose escalation in 74 patients with CP-CML after suboptimal response or failure to IM conventional dose. Patients and methods Median age was 50 years (range 19-85), there were 52 males and 22 females. Thirteen patients were classified as hematologic failure (10 primary and 3 secondary), 57 patients as cytogenetic resistance (24 primary and 33 acquired). Three patients escalated the dose for cytogenetic suboptimal response and one patient for molecular suboptimal response at 18 months. Fifty-four received IM dose escalation from 400 to 600 mg and 20 patients from 400 to 800 mg. Results Overall, after a median follow-up of 36 months, 68/74 (91.8%) patients maintained or achieved a complete haematologic response (CHR); this was maintained in all patients who escalated the dose for cytogenetic failure or suboptimal response. A major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was achieved in 41 patients (72%) who escalated the dose for cytogenetic failure and in 6/13 (46%) patients who escalated imatinib for hematologic failure (p=0.002). Overall, complete cytogenetic responses (CCR) were achieved in 27 (37%) out of 74 CML patients: of the 13 hematologic failure patients, only 5 achieved CCyR: all patients had prior acquired resistance to imatinib. Of the 57 cytogenetic failure, 22 reached CCR: this response was obtained in 27% of the primary cytogenetic resistant, and in 50% of the acquired cytogenetic resistant patients (p=0.02). Three patients who escalated the dose for cytogenetic suboptimal response obtained CCR and complete molecular response (CMR), whereas one patient who escalated the dose for molecular suboptimal response at 18 months did not obtain CMR. Median time to cytogenetic response was 3.5 months. Cytogenetic responses occurred in 37/50 patients who escalated the dose to 600 mg and in 10/20 patients who escalated to 800 mg daily (p=0.234). CMR was obtained in 10 patients: in 7 patients who escalated the dose for cytogenetic failure and in 3 patients who escalated imatinib for suboptimal cytogenetic response. Estimated 2 year-progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) is 87% and 85% respectively. Sixteen patients (21.6%) experienced toxicities and had temporarily IM interruption. Conclusions Imatinib dose escalation can induce sustained responses in a subset of patients with cytogenetic resistance and a prior suboptimal cytogenetic response to standard-dose imatinib, whereas it appears less effective in haematologic failure patients or in molecular sub-optimal responders. The availability of second generation TKI should be taken into account in these letter categories of patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Clinical Efficacy and Safety Of Dasatinib For Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase In Japan

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1493.1493 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1493-1493

Author(s):

Kohei Yamaguchi ◽

Kazunori Murai ◽

Shigeki Ito ◽

Tomoaki Akagi ◽

Kazuei Ogawa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Major Molecular Response ◽

Once Daily

Abstract Background Dasatinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL inhibitor that has a 325-fold higher potency than imatinib and a 16-fold higher potency than nilotinib in vitro. The previous report from the global DASISION trial showed dasatinib resulted in significantly higher and faster rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) compared with imatinib. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dasatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) in Japan. Methods Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were include in this study. Patients received dasatinib 100mg once daily. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months. MMR defined as a BCR-ABL transcript level of 0.1% or lower on the International scale by means of a real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in peripheral blood. Secondary end points were the rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) by 12 months, the rate of MR4.5 (either (i) detectable disease with <0.0032% BCR-ABL1 IS or (ii) undetectable disease in cDNA with >32,000 ABL1 transcripts in the same volume of cDNA used to test for BCR-ABL1) by 12 months and adverse events of dasatinib (UMIN #000006358). Results Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were included in this study. All except one patient administered dasatinib 100 mg once daily. One patient was withdrawal before administration of dasatinib. So far, there were 71 patients with 6 months follow-up and 51 patients with 12 months follow-up. The estimated MMR rates were 69.5 % (95%CI, 58.7-80.3 %) by 6 months and 82.7% (95%CI, 73.0-92.4 %) by 12 months. The estimated MR4.5 rates were 27.1 % (95%CI, 16.7-37.5 %) by 6 months and 48.9% (95%CI, 36.0-61.7 %) by 12 months. Only 6 patients were withdrawal because of adverse event (5 patients) and ineffectiveness (1 patient). Conclusion Dasatinib treatment results in higher rates of molecular responses in newly diagnosed CML-CP patients in Japan. Dasatinib as the first-line agent might be acceptable for CML-CP patients because of better clinical efficacy and less toxicity. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Long Term Outcomes Of Imatinib In Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Saudi Population, Single Center Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.5180.5180 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 5180-5180

Author(s):

Enaam Mohammed Alsobhi ◽

Mohammed m Abrar ◽

Mohammed A Abdelaal ◽

Ahmad S. Alsaeed ◽

Ahmed Al-Absi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Saudi Arabia ◽

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Randomized Study ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

First Line ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background The introduction of Imatinib therapy has significantly changed the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and improved survival. Since the International Randomized Study of Interferon (IRIS), a number of studies were conducted involving diverse populations and showed significant variations in the treatment outcome. To date, there has been no published study on the effectiveness of imatinib in adult CML patients in Saudi Arabia. The aim of the present study was to present a single-institution experience in the treatment with imatinib of newly diagnosed patients with CML and compare it with results from international studies. Methods A total of 101 medical records of consecutive adult CML patients treated with imatinib as first line therapy at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia between 2001 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Survival and response rates were evaluated. Results The estimated overall survival (OS) rates at 5 and 10 years were 95%±2.3% when patients were stratified by cytogenetic type (stander vs.variant Ph positive chromosome) at presentations, significant difference in OS, EFS, and PFS were noted (P=0.001). Complete haematological response was achieved in 94 (93.1%) of our patients, cytogenetic response (CR) in 84 (83.2%) while complete and major cytogenetic response (MCR) were observed in 70 (69.3%) and 6 (5.9%) of the patients respectively. (MR), 62 patients (61.4%) achieved major molecular response (MMR) and 34 (33.7%) complete molecular response. Conclusion compared to other studies among different population, our results confirm the previously noted variation in the response to imatinib. Our study has shown that Ph variant has an impact on the outcome. Further study may be indicated. However second TKI generations as first line in treatment CML with Ph variants should be consider! Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Achieving Complete Cytogenetic Response and BCR-ABL PCRIS <1% within 12 Moths Are Important Goals for Imatinib Therapy in Newly Diagnosed, TKI-Naive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Accelated Phase Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.3158.3158 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 3158-3158

Author(s):

Hawk Kim ◽

Eun-Jung Jang ◽

Sung-Eun Lee ◽

Won Sik Lee ◽

Sukjoong Oh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multivariate Analysis ◽

Platelet Count ◽

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Long Term Outcome

Abstract Background; Accelerated phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (AP-CML) is not clearly defined yet. There are different definitions to classify AP. In European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2013 recommendation, considerable therapeutic approach of de novo AP would be hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) followed by frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). To explore long-term efficacy of frontline imatinib (IM) treatment and early predictors of long-term outcome, we analyzed a total of 73 patients who received frontline IM.. Method; AP defined as a definition of ELN recommendation.. A progression to blastic phase and loss of response were considered as progression. Patients who had received HCT were censored at the time of HCT when calculating overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results; Of 83 patients who diagnosed as AP, 73 patients received IM and other 10 patients had HSCT (n=7) or no treatment (n=3). Of 73 IM-treated patients, 36 patients maintained IM therapy and 37 patients discontinued IM with switch to 2G TKI (n=23) or HSCT (n=14). Analysis of baseline characteristics revealed prior cytogenetic response (CyR), and molecular response at 6 and 12 months for prediction of survivals. Clinical factors for better survival including Sokal score (p=0.203), Hasford sore (p=0.832), peripheral blood (PB) basophil count (p=0.374), spleen size (p=0.656), bone marrow (BM) promelocyte (p=0.839), BM basophil (p=0.478 were not significant. PB blast<10% (p=0.0670), PB eosinophil count>5% (p=0.031), platelet count >20x109/L (p=0.008), PB promyelocyte<2% (p=0.171), PB blast+promelocyte<20% (p=0.095), BM blast+promelocyte<20% (p=0.006), BM blast<10% (p=0.020) at diagnosis, achieving CCyR (p<0.001), achieving BCR-ABL PCRIS <10% (MR1.0) at 3M (p=0.020), BCR-ABL PCRIS <1% (MR2.0) at 6M (p=0.005) and MR2.0 at 12M (p=0.001) were included in multivariate analysis. Platelet count >20x109/L at diagnosis (p=0.002), achieving CCyR (p=0.007) and MR2.0 at 12M (p=0.048) were significant prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. Probability of 10Y OS for patients who acheived CCyR vs. no CCyR were 85.2% vs. 0% (p<0.001); median survival for patients without CCyR was 31.737 (95% CI, 16.269-47.147) months (Figure 2). Probabilities of 10Y OS for MR1.0 at 6M and MR2.0 at 12M were 81.3% vs. 59.7% (p=0.016) and 96.5% vs. 57.4% (p=0.003), respectively. However, time to CCyR<6M was not significant 10Y OS rate 75% vs. 67.6%, p=0.173). The 10Y PFS probability in patients who had acheived CCyR was 66.0% vs. 0% (p<0.001); median PFS for patients without CCyR was 9.462 (95% CI, 1.978-16.946) months. Probabilities of 10Y PFS in MR1.0 at 6M and MR2.0 at 12M were 63.2% vs. 44.9% (p=0.076) and 77.1% vs. 39.8% (p=0.005), respectively. Median PFS for patients not achieving MR1.0 at 6M and MR2.0 at 12M were 30.555 (95% CI, 0.0-61.252) and 22.867 (95% CI, 0.0-50.208), respectively. Time to CCyR<6M was not significant for PFS (10Y PFS rate 50.8% vs. 58.5%, p=0.828). Conclusion: Achievement of CCyR or achievement of MR1.0 at 12M was important goals not only in progression but also in survival. Therefore if a patient doesnÕt achieve the goals, the treatments need to be changed. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Mutations of TET2, IDH1, IDH2 and ASXL1 In Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.3377.3377 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 3377-3377

Author(s):

Catherine Roche-Lestienne ◽

Marceau Alice ◽

Elise Labis ◽

Olivier Nibourel ◽

Valérie Coiteux ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Candidate Genes ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Haematopoietic Stem Cell ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Genetic Event ◽

Myeloid Malignancies

Abstract Abstract 3377 It is generally accepted that the BCR-ABL oncoprotein transformes haematopoietic stem cell and initiates chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, leukemogenesis is a complex process, and genomic heterogeneity of the chronic phase (CP) of the disease has been reported. At the molecular level, this intrinsic heterogeneity could support a causative link with the varying response to treatment and disease progression. Genetic analysis of candidate genes in myeloid malignancies reported mutations of the ten-eleven translocation 2 (TET2), the isocitrate deshydrogenase (IDH) 1 and IDH2, and the additional sex combs like 1 (ASXL1) genes in myeloproliferative, acute myeloid and myelodysplasic neoplasms. Similarly, we can stipulate that these candidate genes may contribute to phenotypic heterogeneity of CML. To investigate whether TET2, IDH1, IDH2 and ASXL1 defect could represent a significant event in CML, we selected 91 CML patients (pts) treated with imatinib (IM) at first line and presenting five profiles of IM response at time of the analysis: 1) 25 pts in major molecular response (MMR) at 12 months of IM; 2) 11 pts in CCR but presenting additional Philadelphia (Ph) negative clonal evolution; 3) 20 pts in partial cytogenetic response at 18 months of IM, referred as primary resistant (R1); 4) 20 pts in acute transformation 4 to 72 months after onset IM; and 5) 15 pts relapsing in CP of the disease, referred as secondary resistant (R2). The search for mutation was performed by sequencing the entire TET2 coding region (11 exons), the IDH1 and IDH2 exon 4 and the ASXL1 exon 12. Analysis of paired samples from CML diagnosis, time of IM response and, when available, CCR revealed: 1) 2 pts (2.2%) in acute transformation presenting 3 TET2 stop mutations not located within conserved region (del at A2079, substitution T4893A - both also been detected at diagnosis -, and del at C4851 which has not been detected at diagnosis, even by mutation-specific ASO-PCR); 2) no IDH1 and IDH2 mutation; and 3) 8 pts (8.7%) presenting ASXl1 stop mutations at diagnosis. Among them, 3 pts (two ins at G646 and one ins at V751) have reached MMR without detected mutations at this time; one R1 pt presenting ins at G646 had major cytogenetic response with 5% Ph+ cells but the mutation was not found at this time and the pt have progressed to MMR 9 months later; one pt with 23 bp del at R634 has evolved in acute transformation with detected mutation at this time; and 3 R2 pts presenting either 4 bp del at S895, del at R860 or 2 pb ins at A752 have lost CCR associated with lost of hematologic response in one case. In this later group of 3 pts, except for del at R860, all ASXL1 mutations were found in samples at time of relapse. We therefore conclude that, contrary to what has been reported in other myeloid malignancies, TET2, IDH1 and IDH2 are not commonly acquired in CML and may not represent a major genetic event in CML transformation. However, ASXL1 alteration seems to be an early event in CML leukemogenesis but does not seem to participate in the disease transformation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Dose Changing and Discontinuation of Imatinib In Patients Affected by Philadelphia Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: a Longitudinal Analysis, a Single Centre Experience.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.4478.4478 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 4478-4478

Author(s):

Serena Merante ◽

Cristiana Pascutto ◽

Ester Orlandi ◽

Lara Pochintesta ◽

Marina Boni ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Intermittent Therapy ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Major Molecular Response ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Risk Of Progression ◽

Tk Inhibitors ◽

Complete Molecular Response

Abstract Abstract 4478 Introduction: Imatinib mesylate (IM) therapy is effective in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, its discontinuation or dose variation in patients who experience sustained molecular response is debated. The possibility of treating patients with an intermittent therapy could also be applied to the second-generation TK-inhibitors. We describe our single institute experience in patients with undetectable levels or in major molecular response of BCR-ABL transcript who reduced or were discontinued from IM therapy. We applied a model for the analysis of longitudinal data to study the BCR/ABL variation according to dose change or discontinuation. Methods: One hundred forty CML patients came to our observation between 1985 and 2009. Among these, 89 patients in chronic phase were eventually treated with IM. Fifty-five patients were treated with IM as naive patients. Each patient's treatment history was subdivided into time periods at constant dosage. Fifty-nine patients were followed-up for a total of 288 periods at constant dosage. At the end of each period, cytogenetic and/or molecular responses were evaluated. Thirty-eight progressions were recorded: 22 molecular, 6 cytogenetic and 10 of both types. The association between progression (molecular, cytogenetic or either) and treatment dose was assessed with the aid of generalized estimating equations (GEE) models, i.e. regression models designed to account for correlation due to repeated measurements over time on the same subject. Ten patients discontinued IM therapy for a period which ranged from three to 60 months, after the patient's individual request and informed consent. Results: We found no association between dose and progression, not even after accounting for period length. Discontinuation of treatment was not associated to an increased risk of progression. No association with a higher risk of progression was found for periods at reduced dosage (<400mg). Four of the 10 patients who discontinued IM are still in complete molecular response and off treatment. Conclusions: It is unclear whether IM can “cure” chronic myeloid leukemia but according to our data this therapy can be safely stopped or its dose varied in patients with complete cytogenetic and major molecular response of up to 18 months. Our experience suggests that withdrawal of IM therapy in CP-CML patients after achievement of a complete molecular response may result in divergent molecular outcomes. The prompt improvement seen after the restart of therapy argues against the development of resistance. The selection of resistant clones after IM exposure, and the emergence of Ph negative clones with secondary cytogenetic abnormalities, are matters of concern, particularly in patients receiving long-term IM. The improved quality of life while off therapy, and the prompt response to restart of IM therapy, suggest that the subset of patients who have sustained complete molecular response may be candidates for a tailored approach to intermittent therapy. We suggest that the same statistical analysis can also be used for other TK-inhibitors that are under study for both retrospective or prospective trials in CML. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Nilotinib in EARLY Chronic PHASE CML Patients WHO Have Suboptimal Cytogenetic or Molecular Response to Imatinib. A Multicentric Retrospective Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.4454.4454 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 4454-4454

Author(s):

Luigia Luciano ◽

Elisa Seneca ◽

Mario Annunziata ◽

Luca Pezzullo ◽

Paolo Danise ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Retrospective Study ◽

Second Generation ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Treatment Resistance ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Major Molecular Response ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 4454 The CML-CP suboptimal responders rappresent an eterogenous group of patients in which it is possible either to obtain an optimal renponse or to experiment a failure. The Clinical data of MDACC, Hammersmith Hospital and GIMEMA group showed that patients with suboptimal response at 6 and 12 months have worse long term outcomes than patients with optimal responses, particularly if the suboptimal response occurs early in the treatment, suggesting an advantage for pts with early major molecular response, expecially for event free survival and progression free survival. Moreover, recently, the German group has shown the benefit of early major molecular response on overall survival too. So earlier use of nilotinib or dasatinib in suboptimal CP CML may be beneficial in two potential ways: by promoting an early response, thereby potentially improving prognosis; by avoiding the development of treatment resistance. The clinical challenge in this setting would be to accurately identify patients who are likely to fail treatment with TKIs. This retrospective analysis was designed to explore the efficacy of the early switch to Nilotinib in patients with suboptimal responses to imatinib (IM) according to ELN raccomandations. In this multicentric retrospective study, 15 CML-CP patients with suboptimal response to IM within 24 months from diagnosis were evaluated: 4pts with a low, 3 with intermedied and 5 with high Sokal score. The best response to IM was CCyR for 6 pts, PCyR for one pt and Complete Hematological Response for 5 pts. As for suboptimal responses, 5 pts were defined in suboptimal cytogenetic response: 2 pts at 12 months and 2 pts at 6 months; 6pts were 18 months suboptimal molecular responders and 1 pt had a loss of CCyR at 12 months. All patients were switched to Nilotinib 400 mg twice daily. Bone marrow was done at baseline in all pts and at 3,6,12 and 18 months in cytogenetic suboptimal pts, while the molecular analysis was performed on peripheral blood every three months in all other pts. 12 pts have been treated with Nilotinib for a median of 17,5 months (range 3–37), 9 patients for ≥ 12 months. Before switching to Nilotinib, pts were treated with IM 400 mg once daily apart for 2 patients who needed an adjustment dose to 300 mg and 600 mg for toxicity and suboptimal response, respectively. Among 6 pts with suboptimal CyR, 4 obtained CCyR, 3 at 3 months and one at 6 months; 2 pts had any response at the milestones timepoints and they switched to another therapy. All pts with molecular suboptimal response obtained MMR at 3 months apart for one, who showed MMR at 12 months. Nilotinib was well tolerated in all 12 pts; only one developed a moderate transaminase elevation. A brief drug intrerruption was sufficient to manage this adverse event. Our data confirm that second generation TKIs give deeper and earlier responses also in second line treatment, garantendo optimal PFS and OS. In our serie infact, Nilotinib treatment results in high and relatively quick cytogenetic and molecular response rate in CML –CP-pts with suboptimal response to IM. These results demonstrate that the early switch to Nilotinib could be raccomanded in suboptimal responders in order to improve the outcome of this kind of pts and strongly suggest the second generation TKI as first line therapy in CML patients. A larger patient population and a longer period of observation could allow to confirm these preliminary data. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text