scholarly journals Achieving Complete Cytogenetic Response and BCR-ABL PCRIS <1% within 12 Moths Are Important Goals for Imatinib Therapy in Newly Diagnosed, TKI-Naive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Accelated Phase Patients

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3158-3158
Author(s):  
Hawk Kim ◽  
Eun-Jung Jang ◽  
Sung-Eun Lee ◽  
Won Sik Lee ◽  
Sukjoong Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Platelet Count ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Long Term Outcome

Abstract Background; Accelerated phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (AP-CML) is not clearly defined yet. There are different definitions to classify AP. In European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2013 recommendation, considerable therapeutic approach of de novo AP would be hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) followed by frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). To explore long-term efficacy of frontline imatinib (IM) treatment and early predictors of long-term outcome, we analyzed a total of 73 patients who received frontline IM.. Method; AP defined as a definition of ELN recommendation.. A progression to blastic phase and loss of response were considered as progression. Patients who had received HCT were censored at the time of HCT when calculating overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results; Of 83 patients who diagnosed as AP, 73 patients received IM and other 10 patients had HSCT (n=7) or no treatment (n=3). Of 73 IM-treated patients, 36 patients maintained IM therapy and 37 patients discontinued IM with switch to 2G TKI (n=23) or HSCT (n=14). Analysis of baseline characteristics revealed prior cytogenetic response (CyR), and molecular response at 6 and 12 months for prediction of survivals. Clinical factors for better survival including Sokal score (p=0.203), Hasford sore (p=0.832), peripheral blood (PB) basophil count (p=0.374), spleen size (p=0.656), bone marrow (BM) promelocyte (p=0.839), BM basophil (p=0.478 were not significant. PB blast<10% (p=0.0670), PB eosinophil count>5% (p=0.031), platelet count >20x109/L (p=0.008), PB promyelocyte<2% (p=0.171), PB blast+promelocyte<20% (p=0.095), BM blast+promelocyte<20% (p=0.006), BM blast<10% (p=0.020) at diagnosis, achieving CCyR (p<0.001), achieving BCR-ABL PCRIS <10% (MR1.0) at 3M (p=0.020), BCR-ABL PCRIS <1% (MR2.0) at 6M (p=0.005) and MR2.0 at 12M (p=0.001) were included in multivariate analysis. Platelet count >20x109/L at diagnosis (p=0.002), achieving CCyR (p=0.007) and MR2.0 at 12M (p=0.048) were significant prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. Probability of 10Y OS for patients who acheived CCyR vs. no CCyR were 85.2% vs. 0% (p<0.001); median survival for patients without CCyR was 31.737 (95% CI, 16.269-47.147) months (Figure 2). Probabilities of 10Y OS for MR1.0 at 6M and MR2.0 at 12M were 81.3% vs. 59.7% (p=0.016) and 96.5% vs. 57.4% (p=0.003), respectively. However, time to CCyR<6M was not significant 10Y OS rate 75% vs. 67.6%, p=0.173). The 10Y PFS probability in patients who had acheived CCyR was 66.0% vs. 0% (p<0.001); median PFS for patients without CCyR was 9.462 (95% CI, 1.978-16.946) months. Probabilities of 10Y PFS in MR1.0 at 6M and MR2.0 at 12M were 63.2% vs. 44.9% (p=0.076) and 77.1% vs. 39.8% (p=0.005), respectively. Median PFS for patients not achieving MR1.0 at 6M and MR2.0 at 12M were 30.555 (95% CI, 0.0-61.252) and 22.867 (95% CI, 0.0-50.208), respectively. Time to CCyR<6M was not significant for PFS (10Y PFS rate 50.8% vs. 58.5%, p=0.828). Conclusion: Achievement of CCyR or achievement of MR1.0 at 12M was important goals not only in progression but also in survival. Therefore if a patient doesnÕt achieve the goals, the treatments need to be changed. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Long-Term Follow-up Results Over 7 Years for Survival, and Safety with Imatinib Mesylate Accompany with Allogeneic Transplantation for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4529-4529
Author(s):  
Jun Wang ◽  
Aining Sun ◽  
Wu Depei ◽  
Huiying Qiu ◽  
XiaoWen Tang
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Imatinib Mesylate ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Abstract 4529 Objective: To observe the efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate (IM) accompany with allogeneic transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Methods: During the period from January 2003 to August 2011,we retrospectively observed 95 patients with CML receiving IM for a minimum of 4 months before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients with advanced CML received IM from 3 month after transplantation for 12 months. Results: Among 95 enrolled patients (CML-CP 76, CML-AP 10, CML-BP 9), types of transplantation: sib-matched HSCT 64, unrelated-HSCT 19, haplo-HSCT 12. For the whole patients, 7 year overall survival (OS) is 80.5%, and disease free survival (DFS) is 74.5%. Complete hematologic response (CHR) is 93.6%, complete cytogenetic response (CCR) is 84.5%, major cytogenetic response (MCR) is 60.3% at 7 year. For CML-CP1, OS is 83.2% and CML-AP/BC is 33.3% (P<0.05). Compared patients of advanced CML achieving CP2 after IM and with no CP2,the former has better results of CCR or MCR, OS and PFS (P<0.05). The total treatment related mortality (TRM) is 16.8%. Cox multivariate regression analysis of prognostic factors indicates that status of CML and severe acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD III-‡W) retain independent predictive value. No increase in rates of serious adverse events was observed with continuous use of IM for up to 7 years. Conclusions: For chronic myeloid leukemia, combining with imatinib mesylate and allogeneic transplantation is a good strategy, with favorable long-term follow-up results and acceptable TRM, especially for the patients with advanced CML. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Early Molecular Response in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Predicts Future Response Status

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5529-5529
Author(s):  
Irina Martynkevich ◽  
Vasily Shuvaev ◽  
Ekaterina Petrova ◽  
Lyubov Polushkina ◽  
Lyudmila Martynenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Transcript Levels ◽  
Optimal Response

Abstract Objectives and background: The level of early MR is important for the optimization of therapy and making a decision to a switch to 2nd line therapy in patients (pts) who have not achieved an optimal response (OR). According to the recent recommendations at definition of OR on CML therapy, pts must have the level of BCR-ABL transcript gene at 10% or less and Ph-positive cells 35% or less at 3 months. But, in half of all cases of pts with BCR-ABL >10% at 3 months progression events happen between 3 and 6 months. The goal of our research was to investigate the prognostic impact of a large BCR-ABL transcript amount at 3 months on the subsequent response and the long-term outcome of CML pts treated frontline with IM. Methods: We have examined 185 pts, who have got IM from January 2010 up to the present. Molecular monitoring has been done regularly in all patients according to ELN recommendations. Median age was 49 years. All pts were in CP. BCR-ABL transcript levels were assessed by real-time quantitative PCR. Results: In our study 54% (100/185 cases) of pts achieved the optimal response with BCR-ABL transcript levels ≤10% at 3 months, 50,3% (93/185 cases) did it - with BCR-ABL transcript levels ≤1% at 6 months, and only 18% achieved the optimal response at 12 months. The comparative analysis has shown statistical differences in all characteristics in 2 groups of pts, who either achieved or not the optimal response at 3 months. Pts with BCR-ABL transcript levels ≤10% more often achieved CCgR at 6 months (g=0,0000), CCgR during all period (g=0,0004), MMR at 12 months (g=0,0000), MMR during all period (g=0,0012) and MR4 during all period (g=0,0000), pts had londer event-free (g=0,0432) and overall (g=0,0279) 4-year survival. Figure 1 Figure 1. In our center we have switched 6 patients to the 2nd TKI - those who didn't achieve the optimal response at 3 months. The switching showed the positive influence on loss level expression of BCR-ABL gene in 5 out of 6 patients. After that all patients achieved the optimal response in the future. For example, we had one patient with failure of IM at 3 months. We switched him the therapy to NI in 5 months after the diagnosis. As a result the patient achieved CCgR at 1,5 months, and the deep molecular response 4,5 log at 3 months. Conclusions: Early and deep responses to TKIs are predictive of long-term response and favorable survival outcomes. 3-month reduction in BCR-ABL transcript levels to >10% is a factor of bad effectiveness of TKI therapy and requires switching to the 2nd TKI. Timely switching to the 2nd TKIs allows us to achieve an optimal response in CML patients with level BCR-ABL >10% at 3 months. References: Timothy P. Hughes, Giuseppe Saglio, Hagop M. Kantarjian et al. Early molecular response predicts outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with frontline nilotinib or imatinib. Blood, 27 February 2014 x Volume 123, Number 9. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Results of Imatinib Dose Escalation After 36 Months of Follow-up in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Failure or Sub-Optimal Response According to 2006 EuropeanLeukemia Net (ELN) Criteria.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3302-3302
Author(s):  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Fabio Stagno ◽  
Roberto Latagliata ◽  
Paolo Vigneri ◽  
Laura Cannella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response

Abstract Abstract 3302 Poster Board III-190 Introduction Imatinib mesylate (IM) given at a daily dose of 400 mg currently represents the gold standard of care for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines propose IM dose escalation to rescue those CML patients with either suboptimal response or drug resistance. We report on the long-term efficacy of IM dose escalation in 74 patients with CP-CML after suboptimal response or failure to IM conventional dose. Patients and methods Median age was 50 years (range 19-85), there were 52 males and 22 females. Thirteen patients were classified as hematologic failure (10 primary and 3 secondary), 57 patients as cytogenetic resistance (24 primary and 33 acquired). Three patients escalated the dose for cytogenetic suboptimal response and one patient for molecular suboptimal response at 18 months. Fifty-four received IM dose escalation from 400 to 600 mg and 20 patients from 400 to 800 mg. Results Overall, after a median follow-up of 36 months, 68/74 (91.8%) patients maintained or achieved a complete haematologic response (CHR); this was maintained in all patients who escalated the dose for cytogenetic failure or suboptimal response. A major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was achieved in 41 patients (72%) who escalated the dose for cytogenetic failure and in 6/13 (46%) patients who escalated imatinib for hematologic failure (p=0.002). Overall, complete cytogenetic responses (CCR) were achieved in 27 (37%) out of 74 CML patients: of the 13 hematologic failure patients, only 5 achieved CCyR: all patients had prior acquired resistance to imatinib. Of the 57 cytogenetic failure, 22 reached CCR: this response was obtained in 27% of the primary cytogenetic resistant, and in 50% of the acquired cytogenetic resistant patients (p=0.02). Three patients who escalated the dose for cytogenetic suboptimal response obtained CCR and complete molecular response (CMR), whereas one patient who escalated the dose for molecular suboptimal response at 18 months did not obtain CMR. Median time to cytogenetic response was 3.5 months. Cytogenetic responses occurred in 37/50 patients who escalated the dose to 600 mg and in 10/20 patients who escalated to 800 mg daily (p=0.234). CMR was obtained in 10 patients: in 7 patients who escalated the dose for cytogenetic failure and in 3 patients who escalated imatinib for suboptimal cytogenetic response. Estimated 2 year-progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) is 87% and 85% respectively. Sixteen patients (21.6%) experienced toxicities and had temporarily IM interruption. Conclusions Imatinib dose escalation can induce sustained responses in a subset of patients with cytogenetic resistance and a prior suboptimal cytogenetic response to standard-dose imatinib, whereas it appears less effective in haematologic failure patients or in molecular sub-optimal responders. The availability of second generation TKI should be taken into account in these letter categories of patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Long Term Outcomes Of Imatinib In Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Saudi Population, Single Center Study

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5180-5180
Author(s):  
Enaam Mohammed Alsobhi ◽  
Mohammed m Abrar ◽  
Mohammed A Abdelaal ◽  
Ahmad S. Alsaeed ◽  
Ahmed Al-Absi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background The introduction of Imatinib therapy has significantly changed the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and improved survival. Since the International Randomized Study of Interferon (IRIS), a number of studies were conducted involving diverse populations and showed significant variations in the treatment outcome. To date, there has been no published study on the effectiveness of imatinib in adult CML patients in Saudi Arabia. The aim of the present study was to present a single-institution experience in the treatment with imatinib of newly diagnosed patients with CML and compare it with results from international studies. Methods A total of 101 medical records of consecutive adult CML patients treated with imatinib as first line therapy at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia between 2001 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Survival and response rates were evaluated. Results The estimated overall survival (OS) rates at 5 and 10 years were 95%±2.3% when patients were stratified by cytogenetic type (stander vs.variant Ph positive chromosome) at presentations, significant difference in OS, EFS, and PFS were noted (P=0.001). Complete haematological response was achieved in 94 (93.1%) of our patients, cytogenetic response (CR) in 84 (83.2%) while complete and major cytogenetic response (MCR) were observed in 70 (69.3%) and 6 (5.9%) of the patients respectively. (MR), 62 patients (61.4%) achieved major molecular response (MMR) and 34 (33.7%) complete molecular response. Conclusion compared to other studies among different population, our results confirm the previously noted variation in the response to imatinib. Our study has shown that Ph variant has an impact on the outcome. Further study may be indicated. However second TKI generations as first line in treatment CML with Ph variants should be consider! Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Mutations of TET2, IDH1, IDH2 and ASXL1 In Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3377-3377
Author(s):  
Catherine Roche-Lestienne ◽  
Marceau Alice ◽  
Elise Labis ◽  
Olivier Nibourel ◽  
Valérie Coiteux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Candidate Genes ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Haematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Genetic Event ◽  
Myeloid Malignancies

Abstract Abstract 3377 It is generally accepted that the BCR-ABL oncoprotein transformes haematopoietic stem cell and initiates chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, leukemogenesis is a complex process, and genomic heterogeneity of the chronic phase (CP) of the disease has been reported. At the molecular level, this intrinsic heterogeneity could support a causative link with the varying response to treatment and disease progression. Genetic analysis of candidate genes in myeloid malignancies reported mutations of the ten-eleven translocation 2 (TET2), the isocitrate deshydrogenase (IDH) 1 and IDH2, and the additional sex combs like 1 (ASXL1) genes in myeloproliferative, acute myeloid and myelodysplasic neoplasms. Similarly, we can stipulate that these candidate genes may contribute to phenotypic heterogeneity of CML. To investigate whether TET2, IDH1, IDH2 and ASXL1 defect could represent a significant event in CML, we selected 91 CML patients (pts) treated with imatinib (IM) at first line and presenting five profiles of IM response at time of the analysis: 1) 25 pts in major molecular response (MMR) at 12 months of IM; 2) 11 pts in CCR but presenting additional Philadelphia (Ph) negative clonal evolution; 3) 20 pts in partial cytogenetic response at 18 months of IM, referred as primary resistant (R1); 4) 20 pts in acute transformation 4 to 72 months after onset IM; and 5) 15 pts relapsing in CP of the disease, referred as secondary resistant (R2). The search for mutation was performed by sequencing the entire TET2 coding region (11 exons), the IDH1 and IDH2 exon 4 and the ASXL1 exon 12. Analysis of paired samples from CML diagnosis, time of IM response and, when available, CCR revealed: 1) 2 pts (2.2%) in acute transformation presenting 3 TET2 stop mutations not located within conserved region (del at A2079, substitution T4893A - both also been detected at diagnosis -, and del at C4851 which has not been detected at diagnosis, even by mutation-specific ASO-PCR); 2) no IDH1 and IDH2 mutation; and 3) 8 pts (8.7%) presenting ASXl1 stop mutations at diagnosis. Among them, 3 pts (two ins at G646 and one ins at V751) have reached MMR without detected mutations at this time; one R1 pt presenting ins at G646 had major cytogenetic response with 5% Ph+ cells but the mutation was not found at this time and the pt have progressed to MMR 9 months later; one pt with 23 bp del at R634 has evolved in acute transformation with detected mutation at this time; and 3 R2 pts presenting either 4 bp del at S895, del at R860 or 2 pb ins at A752 have lost CCR associated with lost of hematologic response in one case. In this later group of 3 pts, except for del at R860, all ASXL1 mutations were found in samples at time of relapse. We therefore conclude that, contrary to what has been reported in other myeloid malignancies, TET2, IDH1 and IDH2 are not commonly acquired in CML and may not represent a major genetic event in CML transformation. However, ASXL1 alteration seems to be an early event in CML leukemogenesis but does not seem to participate in the disease transformation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Long-term prognostic significance of early molecular response to imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: an analysis from the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (19) ◽  
pp. 3758-3765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Susan Branford ◽  
Martin C. Müller ◽  
Jaspal S. Kaeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Complete Cytogenetic Response

AbstractThis study examines the prognostic significance of early molecular response using an expanded dataset in chronic myeloid leukemia patients enrolled in the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS). Serial molecular studies demonstrate decreases in BCR-ABL transcripts over time. Analyses of event-free survival (EFS) and time to progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC) at 7 years were based on molecular responses using the international scale (IS) at 6-, 12-, and 18-month landmarks. Patients with BCR-ABL transcripts > 10% at 6 months and > 1% at 12 months had inferior EFS and higher rate of progression to AP/BC compared with all other molecular response groups. Conversely, patients who achieved major molecular response [MMR: BCR-ABL (IS) ≤ 0.1%] by 18 months enjoyed remarkably durable responses, with no progression to AP/BC and 95% EFS at 7 years. The probability of loss of complete cytogenetic response by 7 years was only 3% for patients in MMR at 18 months versus 26% for patients with complete cytogenetic response but not MMR (P < .001). This study shows a strong association between the degree to which BCR-ABL transcript numbers are reduced by therapy and long-term clinical outcome, supporting the use of time-dependent molecular measures to determine optimal response to therapy. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00006343.

scholarly journals Poor adherence is the main reason for loss of CCyR and imatinib failure for chronic myeloid leukemia patients on long-term therapy

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (14) ◽  
pp. 3733-3736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr R. Ibrahim ◽  
Lina Eliasson ◽  
Jane F. Apperley ◽  
Dragana Milojkovic ◽  
Marco Bua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Poor Adherence ◽  
Adherence Rate ◽  
Lower Probability ◽  
Term Therapy ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Long Term Therapy

Abstract We studied the relation between adherence to imatinib measured with microelectronic monitoring systems and the probabilities of losing a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and of imatinib failure in 87 CCyR chronic myeloid leukemia patients receiving long-term therapy. We included in our analysis the most relevant prognostic factors described to date. On multivariate analysis, the adherence rate and having failed to achieve a major molecular response were the only independent predictors for loss of CCyR and discontinuation of imatinib therapy. The 23 patients with an adherence rate less than or equal to 85% had a higher probability of losing their CCyR at 2 years (26.8% vs 1.5%, P = .0002) and a lower probability of remaining on imatinib (64.5% vs 90.6%, P = .006) than the 64 patients with an adherence rate more than 85%. In summary, we have shown that poor adherence is the principal factor contributing to the loss of cytogenetic responses and treatment failure in patients on long-term therapy.

Five-Year Outcome of 215 Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated Frontline with Nilotinib-Based Regimens: A Gimema CML Working Party Analysis

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3141-3141
Author(s):  
Gabriele Gugliotta ◽  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Luciano Levato ◽  
Giovanna Rege-Cambrin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Secondary Resistance ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background. Nilotinib (NIL) is a potent and selective BCR-ABL inhibitor approved for the frontline treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) based on the results of the ENESTnd study. The sustained superiority of NIL vs. imatinib (IM) was confirmed after 5 years of follow-up (Hughes et al, abs. 677, EHA 2014). However, few data are available on patients (pts) treated frontline with NIL outside of Company-initiated trials. Objectives. To analyze the long-term outcome in a large, independent cohort of newly diagnosed CML pts treated frontline with NIL-based regimens. Methods. We analyzed 215 pts, enrolled in 2 multicenter phase II studies conducted by the GIMEMA CML WP (ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT00481052 and NCT00769327) or treated at the Bologna University Hospital, with NIL 300 mg or 400 mg BID as initial treatment; 123 pts received a sequential treatment with NIL and IM (NIL-IM), with a 3-months (mos) rotation period (all patients received NIL in the first 3 mos). The median age was 53 years (range 18–86). Ten out of 215 pts (5%) had a high EUTOS score. The median follow-up was 57 mos (range 36–81 mos). We assessed: the rates of Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) and Major Molecular Response (MMR); the rates of optimal responders at each milestone according to ELN 2013 recommendations; the overall survival (OS; any death included), progression-free survival (PFS; progression to accelerated/blast phase [AP/BP] and deaths for any cause), failure-free survival (FFS; failures according to ELN 2013 recommendations and deaths for any cause), and event-free survival (EFS; events: failures, permanent discontinuation of NIL for any cause, including deaths). All analysis was made according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results. The cumulative rates of CCyR and MMR were 93% and 88%, respectively. At 3 mos, 82% of the pts were in Partial Cytogenetic Response and 90% had a BCR-ABL/ABL (IS) < 10%; at 6 mos, 86% were in CCyR and 83% had a BCR-ABL/ABL (IS) < 1%; at 12 mos, 72% were in MMR; all these pts were optimal responders according to ELN 2013 recommendations. Overall, 80 (37%) pts permanently discontinued NIL: 45 (21%) for adverse events or intolerance; 25 (12%) for failures; 7 (3%) while in stable MR4; 3 (1%) for other reasons. Cardiovascular adverse events (CVAE) were cause of permanent NIL discontinuation, after a median time of 37 mos, in 13 (6%) pts, and included 4 peripheral arterial occlusive diseases and 3 ischemic coronary diseases; only one pt died for CVAE. Nine (4.1%) pts progressed to AP/BP, 8/9 during the 1st year of therapy and one after 25 mos; all pts subsequently died (after a median of 13 mos, range 1-34 mos). NIL-resistant mutations were identified in 6 of these pts (4 T315I; 1 Y253H; 1 F359V); 7/9 progressions occurred in patients receiving NIL-IM. In addition, 6 pts were classified as failures at 3,6, or 12 mos according to ELN 2013 recommendations; afterwards, 10 pts developed a secondary resistance (3 loss of CHR, 3 loss of CCyR, and 4 confirmed loss of MMR). Overall, 17 (8%) pts died, in 7 cases for reasons unrelated to CML progression. The estimated 6-year OS, PFS, FFS, and EFS were 91%, 91%, 83%, and 59%, respectively. Conclusions. Our National experience showed that most pts treated frontline with NIL-based regimens were optimal responders according to ELN recommendations and that 91% of the patients were estimated to be alive and progression-free at 6 years. In particular, NIL alone was highly effective in the prevention of AP/BP. Considering that AP/BP had in most cases an early onset and an extremely poor prognosis, its prevention should be the priority of CML treatment, especially in the firsts 2-3 years. However, afterwards, the relatively high number of CVAE observed, suggests to focus, at least in selected patients, on strategies aimed at the prevention of CVAE (NIL dose reduction? switch to IM?). Acknowledgments. European LeukemiaNet, COFIN, Bologna University, BolognAIL Disclosures Gugliotta: Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy. Castagnetti:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy. Breccia:novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Abruzzese:Novartis: Consultancy. Martinelli:ARIAD: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Saglio:BMS: Consultancy, Fees for occasional speeches Other; Novartis: Consultancy, Fees for occasional speeches, Fees for occasional speeches Other; Pfizer: Consultancy, Fees for occasional speeches, Fees for occasional speeches Other; ARIAD: Consultancy, Fees for occasional speeches, Fees for occasional speeches Other. Baccarani:Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Rosti:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy.

scholarly journals The Hasford Score Correlates with the Long-Term Molecular Response to Imatinib Treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients and May be Useful for Differentiating Low and Intermediate Risk Patients: A Single Institution Experience

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3152-3152
Author(s):  
Jaroslaw Dybko ◽  
Ewa Medras ◽  
Olga Haus ◽  
Bozena Jazwiec ◽  
Tomasz Wrobel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Eutos Score

Abstract BACKGROUND: Since the beginning of the tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) era in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), there have been attempts to stratify patients for optimal management. An essential requirement for perfect stratification was the identification of factors capable of predicting long-term response [1]. The Sokal and Hasford scores were developed in the chemotherapy and interferon alfa eras, respectively [2]. The EUTOS score was found to predict probability of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) within 18 months of Imatinib initiation and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients receiving Imatinib [3]. However, the usefulness of the EUTOS score in predicting survival and outcome in patients with early chronic phase CML treated with TKI was questioned [4]. The Hasford score failed to differentiate patients who achieved low and intermediate risk scores according to CCyR, MMR, and 5 years EFS [5] and in our study we found Hasford score correlated with the long-term molecular response. PATIENTS AND RESULTS: We analyzed a cohort of 88 patients (F/M:42/46, median age 51 (21-83)) receiving standard dose Imatinib treatment for first chronic phase of CML. As assessed by Hasford risk analysis, the group comprised 57 low risk and 31 intermediate risk patients. In the initial group of patients, there were 5 high risk patients who were excluded from the study. No additional chromosomal abnormalities were identified at diagnosis. All patients achieved complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) at time points defined by the European Leukemia Net (ELN). Of these, 42 patients lost MMR in a median time of 47 months. Within this group we identified 20 low risk (LR) and 22 intermediate risk (IR) patients. There was a significant difference in maintenance of the MMR between IR and LR patients (p=0.03, Figure 1). This analysis revealed that all intermediate risk patients lost MMR after approximately 85 months of Imatinib treatment, while 62% of the low risk patients maintained MMR throughout this time frame. During analysis, all 42 patients were switched to second generation TKI. After 3 months of second generation TKI treatment, median bcr-abl transcript levels in the LR group were 0.01 (0.000-0.295) but in the IR group bcr-abl levels were 0.301 (0.000-44.5) (p=0.0006, Figure 2). CONCLUSIONS: As the Hasford metric was designed for assessing patients treated with interferon alpha, we found our results to be interesting, and to be relevant to the discussion on optimizing scoring systems in chronic myeloid leukemia patients. If the observed difference between low and intermediate risk patients in maintaining MMR on Imatinib is confirmed, IR patients will become candidates for different first line treatment. Despite clinical studies, the choice between Imatinib and second generation TKI as the first line treatment remains an issue. Our results (if confirmed) promise to directly impact treatment decisions affecting IR patients. References: 1. Breccia M, Alimena G. Bringing prognostic scores for chronic myeloid leukemia patients up to date. Expert Rev Hematol. 2011 Aug;4(4):373-5. 2. Hu B1, Savani BN. Impact of risk score calculations in choosing front-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase. Eur J Haematol. 2014 Apr 26. 3. Hasford J1, Baccarani M, Hoffmann V, Guilhot J, Saussele S, Rosti G, Guilhot F, Porkka K, Ossenkoppele G, Lindoerfer D, Simonsson B, Pfirrmann M, Hehlmann R. Predicting complete cytogenetic response and subsequent progression-free survival in 2060 patients with CML on imatinib treatment: the EUTOS score. Blood. 2011 Jul 21;118(3):686-92 4. Jabbour E, Cortes J, Nazha A, O'Brien S, Quintas-Cardama A, Pierce S, Garcia-Manero G, Kantarjian H. EUTOS score is not predictive for survival and outcome in patients with early chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a single institution experience. Blood. 2012 May 10;119(19):4524-6. 5. Yahng SA, Jang EJ, Choi SY, Oh YJ, Bang JH, Park JE, Jeon HL, Lee SE, Kim SH, Byun JY, Kim DW. Comparison of Sokal, Hasford and EUTOS Scores in Terms of Long-Term Treatment Outcome According to the Risks in Each Prognostic Model: A Single Center Data Analyzed in 255 Early Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Frontline Imatinib Mesylate. Blood 2012;120:Abstract 2794 Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients with “Suboptimal” Response to Imatinib (IM) According to European LeukemiaNet Criteria Have a Poorer Outcome with Respect to “Optimal” Responders: A GIMEMA CML WORKING PARTY Analysis.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2196-2196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Gabriele Gugliotta ◽  
Francesca Palandri ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Marilina Amabile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Lower Probability ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Grey Zone ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 2196 Poster Board II-173 BACKGROUND: Imatinib (IM) 400 mg daily is the standard treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in early chronic phase (ECP). The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations were designed to help identify ECP CML patients responding poorly to front-line IM, suggesting, at given time points, when the treatment strategy should be changed (”failure”), or when “the long-term outcome of the treatment would not likely be as favourable” (“suboptimal response”). Suboptimal response is a “grey zone”: the patient may still have substantial benefit from continuing IM, but other therapies should be considered. AIM: To assess the outcome of “failure” and “suboptimal responders” Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) CML patients in a large multicentric, nationwide experience. METHODS: Between January 2004 and April 2007, 559 patients were enrolled in an observational study and in 2 independent intervention studies of the GIMEMA CML WP (Clin Trials Gov. NCT00514488 and NCT00510926). Response monitoring was based on conventional cytogenetic examination of bone marrow cell metaphases every 6 months and RT Q-PCR evaluations of blood cells after 3, 6, 12 months, and every 6 months thereafter. Definitions: major molecular response (MMR): BCR-ABL/ABL ratio < 0,1%IS; failure (according to ELN criteria): no hematologic response (HR) at 3 months, no complete HR (CHR) at 6 months, no cytogenetic response (CgR) at 6 months, no partial CgR (PCgR) at 1 year, no complete CgR (CCgR) at 18 months, loss CHR or CCgR, progression or death; suboptimal response (according to ELN criteria): no CHR at 3 months, no PCgR at 6 months, no CCgR at 12 months, no MMR at 18 months ; optimal response: non-suboptimal and non-failure at each time-point; event: failure or treatment discontinuation for any reason. All the calculations have been made according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: The patients who fitted the ELN criteria for failure had a significantly lower probability of subsequently achieving a CCgR and a MMR, and had a significantly lower overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS) and event-free survival (EFS). The patients who fitted the ELN definitions of suboptimal response at 6 months (data not shown) and at 12 months (figure 1) had a significantly lower probability than “optimal” responders of subsequently achieving a CCgR and a MMR, and a significantly poorer FFS and EFS (figure 1), while the OS was not different in the two groups (90% and 95%, p= 0.35). CONCLUSIONS Our data confirms that suboptimal responders at 6 and at 12 months have a poorer outcome with respect to “optimal” responders, comparable to the outcome of failure patients. Acknowledgments: European LeukemiaNet, COFIN, University of Bologna and BolognAIL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document