CLL2007FMP, a Phase III Randomized Multicentric Trial of the French Cooperative Group On CLL and WM (FCGCLL/MW) and the “Groupe Ouest-Est D'etudes Des Leucémies Aigües Et Autres Maladies Du Sang” (GOELAMS): Immunochemotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) Yields a Significantly Better Response Than Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C) and MabCampath (Cam) (FCCam) In Previously Untreated B-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients as Evaluated by a Sensitive 6 Color Flow Cytometry MRD

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 698-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Letestu Remi ◽  
Stéphane Leprêtre ◽  
Arnoulet Christine ◽  
Baseggio Lucille ◽  
Campos Lydia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Mutational Status

Abstract Abstract 698 Introduction: Between 11/2007 and 01/2009, the FCGCLL/MW and the GOELAMS conducted a multicenter phase III trial, CLL2007FMP, to evaluate the efficacy of FCCam versus FCR in previously untreated medically fit patients. PFS was the primary-end-point of this trial. The trial was discontinued after randomisation of 165 patients for unacceptable toxicity in the FCCam arm. PFS and OS are not yet evaluable but as a sensitive 6 color flow cytometry technique was used to assess MRD in blood and bone marrow at month 9, we were able to evaluate the quality of the response in both arms. Methods and patients: A cohort of 178 medically fit patients (cumulative illness rating scale (CIRS) score < or = 6 and creatinine clearance ≥ 60 ml/min), younger than 65 years old, were enrolled. 165 patients were randomized to receive six oral courses of FC (F 40mg/m2 d1-3 and C 250 mg/m2 d1–3; q 28 days) in combination with either R (n=83; 375 mg/m2 i.v. d 0 at first cycle and 500 mg/m2 d1 all subsequent cycles; q 28 days) or Cam (n=82; 30 mg s/c d1-3; q 28 days). Patients were stratified according to IGHV mutational status and presence of 11q deletion. Cases with 17p deletion were excluded. The trial recruitment was discontinued because of an excess of mortality in the FCCam arm (6 deaths versus 0 in FCR arm), and the last 13 patients enrolled were not randomized. Clinical response was evaluated based on IWCLL criteria. We established a sensitive and specific approach for the evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) at month 9, using a 6-color flow cytometry technique with 3 combinations including characteristic markers and light chain expression. We determined the limit of detection (LOD) of the assay by studying normal blood samples, LOD varied from 0.5 to 0.7×10-5 depending on the combination considered. Result: The Overall Response Rate (ORR) was 91% in the FCR arm and 85% in the FCCam arm (ns). Clinical responses were as follows: CR (FCR: 56/80=70%, FCCam: 45/79 =59%, ns), CR I (FCR:13/FCCam: 11), PR (FCR:5/FCCam:15), and stable and progressive cases (FCR: 6/FCCam:8). When considering together CR and CR I, response rate appeared significantly higher in the FCR arm (86%) than in FCCam arm (70%) (p=0.03). MRD was assessed both in blood and bone marrow at month 9, and was undetectable in 58% patients in blood and only in 36 % in bone marrow. No patient had an undetectable MRD in marrow when detectable in blood. Similarly, MRD was detectable in bone marrow in 15 cases with histologically normal bone marrow biopsy, whereas no nodal PR had undetectable MRD. Therefore, flow cytometry MRD in bone marrow appears as the most sensitive technique for the evaluation of response. Of note, 9 patients had a very good PR with presence of a residual lymphnode, and had undetectable blood and bone marrow MRD (4 in FCCAm arm and 5 in FCR arm). When considering MRD independently from clinical response, the number of MRD negative cases was not significantly different between the two arms (FCR: 45%/FCCam: 26 %) arm. But when combining MRD negativity with clinical complete response, the number of MRD negative CR was significantly higher with FCR (40%) than with FCCam (15%)(p= 0.029). The number of courses of chemotherapy received was slightly but significantly lower in the FCCam arm. Nonetheless, this difference was not accountable for the difference in the quality of response as the number of MRD negative CR remained significantly higher with FCR than with FCCam when considering only the patients having received at least 4 courses of either chemotherapy. The quality of response was not influenced by either presence of deletion11q or mutational status as well. In conclusion, detection of MRD in bone marrow by flow cytometry is a sensitive technique for the evaluation of minimal residual disease. Combining clinical CR with flow cytometry bone marrow MRD allows detecting the best responders. In this randomized phase III trial, besides leading to a lower rate of toxicity, the FCR regimen yielded a significantly higher rate of MRD negative CR than FCCam, and therefore had a positive impact on the quality of the response. Disclosures: Veronique: roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Interest of Early Determination of Bone Marrow MRD by a Sensitive 6-Color Flow Cytometry in the Evaluation of Response: The Experience of the CLL2007FMP, An Intergroup Phase III Randomized Multicentric Trial Comparing Fludarabine Cyclophosphamide (FC) and Rituximab (FCR) Versus FC and MabCampath (FCCam) in Previously Untreated B-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1797-1797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remi Letestu ◽  
Stéphane Leprêtre ◽  
Christine Arnoulet ◽  
Lucile Baseggio ◽  
Lydia Campos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Sensitive Technique ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Abstract 1797 Introduction: The FCGCLL/MW and GOELAMS intergroup have conducted a multicenter phase III trial, CLL2007FMP, to evaluate the efficacy of FCCam versus FCR in previously untreated medically fit CLL patients. This trial was discontinued after randomisation of 165 patients for unacceptable toxicity in the FCCam arm. A sensitive 6-color flow cytometry technique was used to evaluate the response at month 9 (M9) in blood and bone marrow and to subsequently monitor minimal residual disease (MRD). Methods and patients: 178 medically fit patients (CIRS< 6 and creatinin clearance ≥ 60 ml/min), younger than 65 years old, were enrolled. 165 patients were subsequently randomized to receive six oral courses of FC (F: 40mg/m2 d1-3 and C: 250 mg/m2 d1-3; q 28 days) in combination with either R (n=83; 375 mg/m2 i.v. d 0 at first cycle and 500 mg/m2 d1 all subsequent cycles; q 28 days) or Cam (n=82; 30 mg s/c d1-3; q 28 days). Patients were stratified according to IGHV mutational status and presence of 11q deletion. Cases with 17p deletion were excluded. Clinical response was evaluated based on iwCLL classical criteria. We established a sensitive and specific approach for the evaluation of MRD, using a 6-color flow cytometry technique with 3 combinations, including characteristic markers and light chain expression. We determined the limit of detection (LOD) of the assay by studying normal blood samples, and LOD varied from 0.5 to 0.7×10−5, depending on the combination considered. Results: The overall response rate was 87.8% in the FCR arm compared to 85.5% in the FCCam arm (p: NS). CR rates were not significantly different between the two arms with 64.6% in FCR arm and 50.6% in FCCam arm (p=.08). At M9, the rate of undetectable MRD was significantly lower in bone marrow as compared to blood but neither in blood nor bone marrow did reach a significant difference between FCR and FCCam arms. MRD was undetectable in blood in 60.2% of patients (53% of patients in the FCCAm arm and 66.7% in the FCR arm (NS)). In bone marrow samples, MRD was undetectable in 33.7% of patients (25% of patients in the FCCam arm and 41.7% in the FCR arm (NS)). The results were similar when considering exclusively the patients who reached CR. Moreover, MRD was never found detectable in blood when undetectable in bone marrow at the same time point. Therefore, irrespective of treatment arm, the bone marrow sample appeared more efficient than the blood sample for the detection of a persistent residual disease. We next combined blood and bone marrow results to define immunophenotypic remission, we considered MRD at M9 as undetectable when undetectable in bone marrow and MRD as positive when detectable either in blood or bone marrow. The rate of immunophenotypic remission was significantly lower in the FCCam arm as compared to the FCR arm (p=0.03) with our sensitive technique but, interestingly, was no longer significant when using the classical threshold of 10−4 to assess MRD status. The number of best responders, identified by MRD negativity and clinical complete response was significantly higher with FCR than with FCCam (p= 0.029). MRD was again assessed in blood at month 12 and was undetectable in 36.8% of patients in the FCCAm and 41.7% in the FCR arm (NS). All cases with positive blood MRD at M9 remained positive at M12. Among the 21 cases with positive bone marrow MRD and undetectable blood MRD at M9, only 10 explorations in blood at M12 are available at the moment but 4 cases remained undetectable. Conversely, when MRD was undetectable at M9 in both blood and bone marrow, 16/18 remained undetectable at M12, corresponding to a positive switch rate of only 11%. Conclusion: In the era of combined immuno-chemotherapy with the goal of achieving the best response, the most sensitive MRD technique is warranted. The sensitivity of 6-color flow cytometry has proved useful to uncover the differences between the two treatment arms. In this study, the evaluation of MRD in bone marrow by 6-color flow cytometry is the most sensitive technique for the early evaluation of persisting residual disease. It may not be supplanted by MRD determination in blood at M12 for the precise assessment of the immunophenotypic remission rate. Studies including sequential determinations and MRD kinetics are ongoing to determine which interpretation threshold and time-points are the best predictors of progression-free survival. Disclosures: Leblond: Roche, Genzyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cymbalista:Roche (d) Mundipharma (e) Genzyme (e): Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Minimal Residual Disease Evaluation Using 8-Color Flow Cytometry Predicts Risk of Relapse in High-Risk and/or Young Myeloma Patients Who Receive Bortezomib Consolidation after Frontline Tandem Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4666-4666
Author(s):  
Richard Leblanc ◽  
Imran Ahmad ◽  
Rafik Terra ◽  
Séverine Landais ◽  
Céline Nkoue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Risk Of Relapse

Abstract Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable with standard therapies. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is the only curative treatment for these patients. We hypothesized that bortezomib (BTZ) consolidation after tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and nonmyeloablative (NMA) alloSCT could improve quality of response while decreasing relapse and cGVHD. We also sought to determine prospectively the predictive value of bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) evaluation using a highly sensitive flow cytometry assay. Methods: Newly diagnosed myeloma (NDMM) patients ≤65 years with high-risk (HR) features (based on cytogenetics, ISS 3 or plasma cell leukemia) or ≤50 year regardless of risk status with an 8/8 HLA matched donor are eligible to participate in this prospective trial. After a BTZ-based induction and ASCT, outpatient NMA alloSCT is performed with either fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (sibling donor) or fludarabine and TBI 2 Gy (unrelated donor) followed by peripheral blood stem cells. GVHD prophylaxis consists of tacrolimus and MMF. BTZ is initiated on day +120 post-alloSCT at 1.3 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for 1 year. Response evaluation is based on IMWG criteria. Bone marrow MRD evaluation is performed on 10x106 nucleated cells with highly sensitive (≥10-5) next-generation flow cytometry using the 8-color EuroFlow protocol (CD45, CD38, CD138, CD56, CD19, CD27, CD81, CD117, CyIgκ and CyIgλ) before alloSCT, before BTZ and every 3 months for 2 years. Immunophenotypic complete response (iCR) is defined as stringent CR in addition to 2 consecutive negative MRD results. aGVHD and cGVHD are evaluated prospectively. Results: As of June 29th 2018, 37 patients have been enrolled with a median age of 53 (range: 35-64) years. ISS 3 is found in 43% and HR cytogenetics in 54% (5% del17p, 14% t(4;14), 22% gain 1q21 and 14% >1 HR cytogenetics). Induction consisted of CyBorD (81%) or VTD (19%) for a median of 4 (range: 4-7) cycles. Median times from induction to ASCT and from ASCT to alloSCT were 5.8 and 4.4 months, respectively. Sibling and unrelated donor transplants were performed in 43% and 57%, respectively. KPS and HCT-CI were 90 (range 80-100) and 1 (range 0-3), respectively. Median follow-up is 21 (range 0-39) months after alloSCT. Of enrolled patients, 34 have started BTZ and received 92.5% of planned doses, with no dose reduction needed for toxicity. Observed grade ≥3 non-hematologic toxicities possibly/related to BTZ included diarrhea (n=1), viral hemorrhagic cystitis (2 adenovirus, 1 BK) and nocardial brain abscesses (n=1). Cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV aGVHD were 26% and 11%. Incidences of all grade, moderate/severe and severe cGVHD at 24 months were 61%, 47% and 10%, respectively, with mostly mouth, skin and liver involvement. Compared to 27 historical controls who did not receive BTZ after tandem transplant, the incidence of moderate/severe cGVHD was much lower in BTZ recipients (47 vs 78%; p=0.002). After reviewing each target organ involvement, mouth and eye cGVHD were significantly less severe with BTZ. Three patients died, one from myeloma progression and 2 from grade III aGVHD, with a 24-month non-relapse mortality of only 8%. BTZ consolidation improved depth of response, increasing ≥CR rate from 64% to 85% and iCR rate from 25% to 59%, regardless of cytogenetic abnormalities (Table 1). Probability of progression-free survival (PFS) at 24 months was 65% (CI 95%: 42-81) while overall survival (OS) was 90% (CI 95%: 70-97; Fig. 1A). The cumulative incidence of progression at 24 months was 28%. Importantly, the presence of ≤50 myeloma cells in the bone marrow 10 months post-alloSCT (after 6 months of BTZ) was associated with a significantly lower probability of progression (15% versus 80%; p=0.03; Fig. 1B). Conclusion: Tandem ASCT-NMA alloSCT followed by BTZ consolidation results in a remarkably high rate of ≥CR, including iCR. For the first time in allogeneic transplant recipients, MRD evaluation using the EuroFlow protocol demonstrates that identification of ≤50 myeloma cells in the bone marrow 10 months after alloSCT/6 months after BTZ seems predictive of a better outcome. If confirmed, this landmark could be used to design future therapeutic interventions in order to decrease the risk of relapse after tandem transplant. Finally, BTZ following alloSCT is safe and may contribute to decrease both incidence and severity of cGVHD. Disclosures Leblanc: Amgen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sebag:Amgen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cohen:ExCellThera: Patents & Royalties: Royalities from sales of UM171. Kiss:Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lachance:ExCellThera: Patents & Royalties: Royalities from sales of UM171. Roy:Kiadis Pharma: Other: Travel support; University of Montreal: Patents & Royalties: Author on patent; Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont: Patents & Royalties: Author on patent. Sauvageau:ExCellThera: Employment, Equity Ownership. Roy:Janssen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding.

scholarly journals A 10-Color Flow Cytometry Panel for Both Diagnosis and Minimal Residual Disease Measurement in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5451-5451
Author(s):  
Alexandre Bazinet ◽  
Ryan N Rys ◽  
Claudia M Wever ◽  
Amadou Barry ◽  
Celia Greenwood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Potential Cost ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Minimal Residual

Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has a classic immunophenotype, consisting of light chain restriction, CD5+, CD19+, dim CD20, CD23+, CD43+, CD200+, CD10- and CD79b-. This distinguishes it from normal B cells and other lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs). Antibodies targeting these antigens are included in two 8-color flow cytometry panels developed by the Euroflow consortium for the work up of B cell LPDs. Combining these antibodies into one 10-color panel would be more cost-effective. Furthermore, new CLL therapies can induce deep remissions, creating an increasing demand to measure minimal residual disease (MRD), defined as having over 1 residual leukemic cell per 10,000 leukocytes (10-4). The current international standardized approach for measuring MRD established by the European Research Initiative on CLL (ERIC) uses a panel of antibodies targeting CD3, CD5, CD19, CD20, CD22, CD43, CD79b and CD81. However, these antibody-fluorochrome combinations are different than those used by the Euroflow diagnostic panels. Thus laboratories considering implementing MRD testing would need to purchase antibodies for 3 different panels (2 diagnostic and 1 MRD). We expanded the Euroflow 8-color lymphocyte screening tube (LST) to include CD200 and CD23, such that CLL can be detected in one 10-color tube, at levels as low as 0.01%. The goal of this study was to determine the potential cost savings in implementing this new panel and to determine if it is sensitive enough to detect MRD. Methods: We calculated the number of samples analyzed with our modified 10-color LST tube (mLST1, obtained lyophilized) from April 2018 to March 2019 to rule out an LPD and the number of antibody aliquots saved using this approach compared to the standard 2-tube Euroflow method. We also created a version of the above-mentioned panel (mLST2) using liquid antibodies to increase the generalizability of our results, substituting CD38 with CD43 to see if this improved MRD detection (see panels below). For MRD testing, we used CLL samples from 24 different patients to produce 60 MRD samples at various concentrations of leukemic cells. Samples were prepared by spiking CLL cells into suspensions of normal leukocytes at approximate concentrations of 0.1%, 0.01% and 0.001%. Each sample was aliquoted and stained with the three panels: ERIC, mLST1 and mLST2. Data was acquired using a BD FACSCanto II or a BD FACSAria Fusion and analysed using BD FACSDiva software. CLL cells were identified based on differential expression of key markers and MRD was calculated as the number of CLL cells/total leukocytes. MRD positivity was defined as ≥ 0.01%. Agreement between the panels was assessed using the Bland-Altman plot method. We also calculated the percentage agreement between the panels in identifying MRD positivity. Results: In 1 year, mLST1 was performed on 474 samples, of these 220 had an LPD and 123 (56%) had a classic CLL phenotype, obviating the need for further testing. This resulted in the net savings of 476 antibody aliquots. For MRD assessment, differential expression of CD5 and CD20 were the most significant contributors in distinguishing CLL from normal B cells using the mLST1 and mLST2. We identified one CLL case with an atypical immunophenotype (dim CD5, bright CD20) which proved difficult to gate using a mLST panel. There was agreement in MRD results obtained with the mLST panels and the ERIC panel. For values above the limit of quantification, the 95% limit of agreement was ±0.3369 log for the ERIC vs mLST1 comparison and ±0.3485 log for the ERIC vs mLST2 comparison. Thus, variability in MRD levels between the panels was less than 2-fold the majority of the time, which we considered clinically acceptable as MRD is measured on an exponential scale. The ERIC panel and the mLST1 had 88.3% agreement in distinguishing MRD-positive versus MRD-negative samples. Agreement was 93.3% between the ERIC panel and the mLST2. Conclusions: Using a modified 10-color LST panel for both diagnosis and MRD measurement of CLL is feasible. The advantages are increased familiarity with the antibodies and potential cost savings, making MRD accessible to more cytometry laboratories. Atypical CLL cases without the usual CD5 positivity and dim CD20 are very difficult to gate using an LST panel. In these cases, the ERIC panel is clearly superior as CD22, CD79b, CD81 and CD43 can still provide separation between the malignant and normal lymphocytes. Disclosures Bazinet: BD Biosciences: Other: Provided a significant amount of the antibodies used in this project free of cost.. Wever:Teva Canada Innovation: Employment. Gimmig:BD Biosciences: Employment. Johnson:Lundbeck: Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel fees, gifts, and others, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel fees, gifts, and others, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BD Biosciences: Other: Provided a significant proportion of the antibodies used in this project free of cost.; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria.

Impact of Immunophenotype and Cytogenetics in Early Assessment of Post Induction Response in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4954-4954
Author(s):  
Robert Schneidewend ◽  
Karen B. Carlson ◽  
Ehab Atallah ◽  
Laura C. Michaelis ◽  
Paul R. Hosking ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Bone Marrow Cellularity ◽  
Bone Marrow Evaluation ◽  
Marrow Cellularity

Abstract OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine whether flow cytometry and genetic estimation of blast populations in bone marrow samples from adult patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for AML were consistent with morphologic evaluation. BACKGROUND: Early post induction evaluation is paramount to assess the need for additional treatment in patients with AML. Yet, low bone marrow cellularity lends uncertainty to evaluation on the level of residual disease. This study evaluates whether standard addition of multi-color flow cytometry and karyotype analysis by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) examination can assist in determining residual disease and guide further therapy METHODS: Fifty newly diagnosed adult patients with AML who received seven days of continuous infusion cytarabine and three days of anthracycline ('7+3') at a single institution between February, 2013 and March, 2015 were identified for this analysis. Patients were divided into three groups according to day-14 bone marrow biopsy evaluation: 1) those with ² 5% blasts; 2) those with ³ 5% blasts, and bone marrow cellularity > 20%; and 3) those with ³ 5% blasts, and bone marrow cellularity ² 20%. Results were considered concordant if the parameters being compared were both <5% or >5%. Table 1. Patient Characteristics Number of Patients n = 50 Median Age 58.5 years (range 19-73 years) Male: Female 1.27:1 Risk stratification by ELN Low = 10 (20%) Intermediate-1 = 4 (8%) Intermediate-2 = 14 (28%) High Risk = 17 (34%) Indeterminate = 5 (10%) Antecedent MDS n = 14, 28% Therapy-related AML n = 2, 4% FLT-3 mutation (ITD or TKD) n = 8, 16% Overall response 56% CR, 18% CRi, 26% Induction Failure RESULTS: Patient characteristics are described in Table 1. Informative results for FISH and flow cytometry were available in 56% and 86% of cases, respectively. Results from bone marrow evaluation of each subgroup are detailed in Table 2. Bone marrow interpretation based on flow cytometry versus morphologic estimation of myeloblasts was consistent in 60% (n = 26 of 43) of all mid-cycle samples. Immunophenotype demonstrated lower disease burden in the discordant cases (N=17). Among patients with chromosomal abnormalities (N=28), bone marrow myeloblast percentage based on FISH was consistent with morphologic evaluation in 60% ofsamples. FISH demonstrated higher disease burden in all discordant cases (N=11). Table 2. Bone Marrow Evaluation ² 5% blasts ³ 5% blasts, and > 20% cellular > 5% blasts,and ² 20% cellular n, % total n = 26, 52% n = 6, 12% n = 18, 36% Mean age 53.46 63 51.5 European Leukemia Net (ELN) Risk-stratification Low = 8 Intermediate-1 = 2 Intermediate-2 = 5 High Risk = 8 Indeterminate = 3 Low = 0 Intermediate-1 = 0 Intermediate-2 = 2 High Risk = 2 Indeterminate = 2 Low = 2 Intermediate-1 = 2 Intermediate-2 = 6 High Risk = 7 Indeterminate = 1 Response to induction, all cycles CR = 16/26 = 62% CRi = 6/26 = 23% CR = 2/6 = 33% CRi = 1/6 = 17% CR = 10/18 = 56% CRi = 2/18 = 11% Consistent interpretation based on morphology and flow cytometry 22/23 = 96% 1/5 = 20% 3/15 = 20% Consistent interpretation based on morphology and cytogenetic/FISH analysis 10/14 = 71% 4/4 = 100% 3/10 = 30% CONCLUSIONS: Our data identifies a significant proportion of patients for whom the decision to administer a 2nd cycle of 7+3 chemotherapy is unclear based on day-14 bone marrow evaluation (i.e., > 5% myeloblasts, and ² 20% cellular). Standard immunophenotyping at day 14 did not assist interpretation of chemotherapy response, possibly because of sample hemodilution. However, when available, karyotyping with FISH demonstrated a better assessment of disease burden. Although the number of samples was too small to correlate with therapy response, our data suggests that future studies to quantify the leukemic clone by genetic analysis and correlate these results with clinical outcome may improve prognostication based on mid-cycle bone marrow responsiveness to chemotherapy. Disclosures Michaelis: Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Wyeth: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Equity Ownership. Hari:Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Hamadani:MedImmune: Consultancy; Cellerant: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy. Fenske:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Multiparametric Flow-Cytometry Is a Reliable Tool for Measurable Residual Disease Assessment and Risk-Stratification of FLT3-Mutated AML Patients

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5083-5083
Author(s):  
Raffaele Palmieri ◽  
Luca Maurillo ◽  
Alfonso Piciocchi ◽  
Maria Ilaria Del Principe ◽  
Valentina Arena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Npm1 Mutation ◽  
Multiparametric Flow Cytometry ◽  
Reliable Tool ◽  
Measurable Residual Disease

Background: Mutations of the gene encoding Fms Related Tyrosine Kinase 3 (FLT3), at the juxta-membrane level (ITD), represent the most common lesions found in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), identifying a subgroup of patients (pts) with unfavorable prognosis. FLT3-ITD mutations are considered an unreliable tool for measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring, due to their intraclonal heterogeneity and instability during the course of disease. Instead, multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) may represent an alternative to monitor MRD in this molecular subset. In fact, through the recognition and monitoring of leukemia associated immunophenotypes, MFC is applicable to > 90% of AML patients with a sensitivity of 10-4. Aims: The aim of our study was to investigate the reliability of MFC in MRD assessment of 72 FLT3-ITD positive pts whose treatment allocation was prospectively decided according to the genetic/cytogenetic profile at diagnosis and post consolidation MRD. FLT3-ITD pts were to receive, after induction and consolidation, allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT), whatever the source of stem cells. In this subgroup analysis, we investigated if FLT3-ITD mutated pts have a different propensity to achieve high quality (e.g. MRD negative) complete remission as compared to FLT3 wildtype ones. Furthermore, we seek for a correlation between different levels of MRD and overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Methods: We included in the analysis 72 pts with de novo AML carrying FLT3-ITD mutations whose MRD assessment at the post-consolidation timepoint was available. Pts were defined as MRD-negative, when obtaining a residual leukemic cells count below the threshold of 3.5x10-4 (0.035%). MRD positive pts (with MRD ≥ 3.5x10-4 RLC) were stratified into 3 classes according to the levels of MRD (0.035%-0.1%; >0.1%-1%; >1%). We compared the MRD status and clinical outcome with a matched group of FLT3 wildtype AML (n = 203) treated in the same protocol. Results: Overall median age was 49 (range 18-60.9). The 2 cohorts were balanced in terms of age and sex distribution. In the FLT3-ITD group, 80/126 (64%) cases carried a concomitant NPM1 mutation vs 107/374 (28.6%) of FLT3 wildtype ones (p <0.001). Furthermore, FLT3 mutated pts had a median WBC count of 35x109/L vs 9.5x109/L of those FLT3 wildtype (p < 0.001). MRD determination after consolidation cycle was available in 72/126 FLT3-ITD pts (57%) and in 203/374 FLT3 wildtypeones (54.3%), respectively. After having received induction and consolidation course, 47/72 FLT3-ITD pts (65,2%) were submitted to allogenic stem cells transplantation (ASCT). At the post-consolidation time-point, MRD negativity rate was significantly lower in FTL3-ITD pts (27/72, 37.5%) as compared to those FLT3 wildtype (94/203, 46.3%). Furthermore, 38/72 (52.8%) and 10/72 (13.9%) FLT3-ITD pts had a level of MRD > 0.1% and > 1%, respectively as compared to 65/203 (33.0%) and 15/203 (7.4%) of FLT3 wildtypeones, respectively (p=0.017). When considering the different MRD stratification levels of FLT3-ITD pts, OS probability at 24 months was 57.2% (27 pts), 71.4% (7 pts), 53.6% (28 pts) and 20% (10 pts), for the MRD categories <0.035%, 0.035%-0.1%, >0.1%-1%, >1%, respectively (p=0.028). DFS probability at 24 months was 53.8% (27 pts), 71.4% (7 pts), 34.9% (27 pts) and 20% (10 pts), for the MRD categories <0.035%, 0.035%-0.1%, >0.1%-1%, >1%, respectively (p=0.038). Summary/Conclusion: We demonstrated that MRD determination by MFC is a reliable tool to assess remission quality and prognosis in FLT-ITD positive patients. This subpopulation shows a lower propensity to obtain a MRD negative CR, with the majority of pts maintaining an amount of MRD > 0.1% after standard treatment. Even though most of these pts were addressed to ASCT, post-consolidation MRD maintained its negative impact on OS and DFS, particularly for those pts with MRD >1%. In the attempt to improve the quality of response, prevent leukemia recurrence and pursue a durable remission, delivery of FLT3 inhibitors as a maintenance after transplant may represent a promising option. Disclosures Venditti: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Buccisano:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals EZH2 Mutations and Impact on Clinical Outcome Analyzed in 1604 Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1528-1528
Author(s):  
Sebastian Stasik ◽  
Jan Moritz Middeke ◽  
Michael Kramer ◽  
Christoph Rollig ◽  
Alwin Krämer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Purpose: The enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is a histone methyltransferase and key epigenetic regulator involved in transcriptional repression and embryonic development. Loss of EZH2 activity by inactivating mutations is associated with poor prognosis in myeloid malignancies such as MDS. More recently, EZH2 inactivation was shown to induce chemoresistance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Göllner et al., 2017). Data on the frequency and prognostic role of EZH2-mutations in AML are rare and mostly confined to smaller cohorts. To investigate the prevalence and prognostic impact of this alteration in more detail, we analyzed a large cohort of AML patients (n = 1604) for EZH2 mutations. Patients and Methods: All patients analyzed had newly diagnosed AML, were registered in clinical protocols of the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL) (AML96, AML2003 or AML60+, SORAML) and had available material at diagnosis. Screening for EZH2 mutations and associated alterations was done using Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) (TruSight Myeloid Sequencing Panel, Illumina) on an Illumina MiSeq-system using bone marrow or peripheral blood. Detection was conducted with a defined cut-off of 5% variant allele frequency (VAF). All samples below the predefined threshold were classified as EZH2 wild type (wt). Patient clinical characteristics and co-mutations were analyzed according to the mutational status. Furthermore, multivariate analysis was used to identify the impact of EZH2 mutations on outcome. Results: EZH2-mutations were found in 63 of 1604 (4%) patients, with a median VAF of 44% (range 6-97%; median coverage 3077x). Mutations were detected within several exons (2-6; 8-12; 14-20) with highest frequencies in exons 17 and 18 (29%). The majority of detected mutations (71% missense and 29% nonsense/frameshift) were single nucleotide variants (SNVs) (87%), followed by small indel mutations. Descriptive statistics of clinical parameters and associated co-mutations revealed significant differences between EZH2-mut and -wt patients. At diagnosis, patients with EZH2 mutations were significantly older (median age 59 yrs) than EZH2-wt patients (median 56 yrs; p=0.044). In addition, significantly fewer EZH2-mut patients (71%) were diagnosed with de novo AML compared to EZH2-wt patients (84%; p=0.036). Accordingly, EZH2-mut patients had a higher rate of secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) (21%), evolving from prior MDS or after prior chemotherapy (tAML) (8%; p=0.036). Also, bone marrow (and blood) blast counts differed between the two groups (EZH2-mut patients had significantly lower BM and PB blast counts; p=0.013). In contrast, no differences were observed for WBC counts, karyotype, ECOG performance status and ELN-2017 risk category compared to EZH2-wt patients. Based on cytogenetics according to the 2017 ELN criteria, 35% of EZH2-mut patients were categorized with favorable risk, 28% had intermediate and 37% adverse risk. No association was seen with -7/7q-. In the group of EZH2-mut AML patients, significantly higher rates of co-mutations were detected in RUNX1 (25%), ASXL1 (22%) and NRAS (25%) compared to EZH2-wt patients (with 10%; 8% and 15%, respectively). Vice versa, concomitant mutations in NPM1 were (non-significantly) more common in EZH2-wt patients (33%) vs EZH2-mut patients (21%). For other frequently mutated genes in AML there was no major difference between EZH2-mut and -wt patients, e.g. FLT3ITD (13%), FLT3TKD (10%) and CEBPA (24%), as well as genes encoding epigenetic modifiers, namely, DNMT3A (21%), IDH1/2 (11/14%), and TET2 (21%). The correlation of EZH2 mutational status with clinical outcomes showed no effect of EZH2 mutations on the rate of complete remission (CR), relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) (with a median OS of 18.4 and 17.1 months for EZH2-mut and -wt patients, respectively) in the univariate analyses. Likewise, the multivariate analysis with clinical variable such as age, cytogenetics and WBC using Cox proportional hazard regression, revealed that EZH2 mutations were not an independent risk factor for OS or RFS. Conclusion EZH mutations are recurrent alterations in patients with AML. The association with certain clinical factors and typical mutations such as RUNX1 and ASXL1 points to the fact that these mutations are associated with secondary AML. Our data do not indicate that EZH2 mutations represent an independent prognostic factor. Disclosures Middeke: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rollig:Bayer: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Scholl:Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbivie: Other: Travel support; Alexion: Other: Travel support; MDS: Other: Travel support; Novartis: Other: Travel support; Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Carreras Foundation: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hochhaus:Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Brümmendorf:Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Burchert:AOP Orphan: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Krause:Novartis: Research Funding. Hänel:Amgen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Platzbecker:Celgene: Research Funding. Mayer:Eisai: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding. Serve:Bayer: Research Funding. Ehninger:Cellex Gesellschaft fuer Zellgewinnung mbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; Bayer: Research Funding; GEMoaB Monoclonals GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership. Thiede:AgenDix: Other: Ownership; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Novel Leukemia Associated Immunophenotype (LAIP) Absent from Normal and Regenerating Bone Marrow Identified by Multiparameter 6-Color Flow Cytometry.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2362-2362
Author(s):  
Denis Guyotat ◽  
Daniela Olaru ◽  
Pascale Flandrin ◽  
Nathalie Nadal ◽  
Lydia Campos
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Blast Cells ◽  
Disease Study ◽  
New Generation ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Flow cytometry analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is based on the detection of aberrant phenotypes responsible for the relapse. Until now, all studies were performed by 3 or 4 color immunostaining, allowing the identification of LAIP in 80% of cases. Moreover, no data is available regarding the existence of such phenotypes in regenerating bone marrow. The new generation of cytometers allows the study of 8 parameters that permit a better distinction of malignant from normal phenotypes. In our study we analyzed 20 bone marrow samples from allogeneic donors, 20 ALL regenerating bone marrows after chemotherapy and 53 AML samples at diagnosis. Multiparameter 4 colour and 6 colour flow cytometry was used in order to define antigen combinations which are totally absent or present at very minimal levels in normal and regenerating hematopoiesis. “Blast cells” were gated according to CD45/SSC properties.For the first time we describe by 6 color flow cytometry 47 phenotypes totally absent from “blasts” gate in all normal bone marrow (ex: CD34+DR−117+33−15+, CD34+38+33−56+19−, CD14−DR+4+11B+64+). Another 41 phenotypes were identified as presents at a frequency < 0,05% of total cells (ex: CD34+DR+117−33+15+, CD14−DR+4+11B+64−, CD34+65−56+4−16−). There was no significant difference between normal and regenerating marrows. The 4 color panel of moAbs allowed us to identify only 30 phenotypes presents at a frequency < 0,05% of total cells (ex: CD34+33−13+, CD34+117+11b+, CD34+DR−13+). 53 AML at diagnosis were studied using 6 color immunophenotyping and 58 % of phenotypes described as aberrant or infrequent in normal myeloid hematopoiesis were found in at least one AML at diagnosis in more than 1% of total cells. All AML cases show at least one LAIP but frequently we observed more than one LAIP blast subpopulation in the same sample. Some examples of LAIP observed are CD34+ 38+ 33+ 56+ 19−, CD34+ 38+ 33+ 56− 19+, CD34− DR− 117+ 33+ 15−. In conclusion our results shows that (1) the ability to clearly distinguish leukemic from the healthy cells is considerably increased by 6 color approach (8 parameters analyzed) than 4 color. (2) Furthermore that these aberrant or infrequent phenotypes in normal or regenerating bone marrow samples are identified in AML cases and can be utilized in AML minimal residual disease study. (3) Knowledge of the expression of different markers in normal hematopoietic development provides a frame of reference for identification of abnormal differentiation patterns.

Final Results of Lower Dose Fludarabine (F) and Cyclophosphamide (C), and High Dose Rituximab (R), (FCR-Lite) for Patients with Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2037-2037
Author(s):  
Ahmad A. Tarhini ◽  
S. Land ◽  
L. Pietragallo ◽  
A. Laman ◽  
M. Sulecki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Major Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Age Range

Abstract Introduction Standard FCR therapy in untreated CLL patients (F-25 mg/m2 d1–3 q 4wk; C-250 mg/m2 d 1–3 q 4wk; R-500 mg/m2 d1 q 4wk for 6 cycles) was reported to have complete remissions (CR) of 70% and overall responses (OR) of 95% (J Clin Oncol2005;23:4079). The major toxicity was grade 3/4 neutropenia during 52% of treatment courses. One approach to decrease neutropenia without compromising efficacy could be by reducing the doses of F and C and increasing the dose of R. Methods We conducted a phase II study for previously untreated advanced CLL patients treated with FCR-Lite (F-20mg/m2 d1–3 q 4 wk; C-150 mg/m2 d1–3 q 4 wk; R-500mg/m2 d1 and d14 q 4wks; maintenance R-500 mg/m2 ×1 q 3 months until progression). A Simon two-stage design was used where 15 patients were accrued in the first stage and because of acceptable toxicity and response rate in stage I an additional 35 patients were treated. The primary endpoint was response rate. Results A total of 50 patients were entered into this study and 42 are currently evaluable. There were 29 male and 13 female patients with an age range of 36–85 years (median 58) treated with a total of 236 courses of FCR-Lite. All 42 patients were evaluable for toxicity. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred during 29 (12%) courses with two episodes of neutropenic fever. One patient had cellulitis, another had pneumonia (not neutropenic). Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred during 7 (3%) courses and grade III/IV anemia during 6 (2.5%) courses. Among the 40 evaluable patients for response, the CR rate was 85%, PR rate was 15% with an OR rate of 100%. All of the CR patients were tested by flow cytometry and had &lt;1% CD5+/CD19+ cells in their bone marrow after therapy. One patient with potential CR was excluded due to the absence of follow up bone marrow biopsy. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was tested by four color flow cytometry (sensitivity 0.01%) in 8 patients with CR (Genzyme Genetics Corp.). Seven had no evidence of MRD at 7, 8, 8, 14, 22, 25 and 30 months respectively, post CR, and one patient had 0.03% and 0.06% when tested at 12 and 18 months post CR respectively. Conclusions Our results in 42 patients suggest FCR-Lite is highly effective with considerably less grade 3/4 neutropenia than standard FCR. Complete responders had no detectable CD5+/CD19+ cells in their bone marrow following FCR-Lite. MRD testing is currently underway for all patients.

Prognostic Importance of Duration of MDS Prior to Randomization Between Decitabine (DAC) Vs. Best Supportive Care (BSC) In Elderly IPSS Intermediate-2 and High Risk MDS Patients: Results of the 06011 EORTC-GMDSSG Phase III Trial

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4024-4024
Author(s):  
Michael Lubbert ◽  
Stefan Suciu ◽  
Uwe Platzbecker ◽  
Aristoteles A.N. Giagounidis ◽  
Dominik Selleslag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Response Predictors ◽  
Long Duration

Abstract Abstract 4024 Background: The hypomethylating agents 5-azacytidine (Vidaza) and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (Decitabine, DAC) are active in different MDS subtypes. Compared to other response predictors to DAC, prior MDS duration has received only limited attention (1, 2), with conflicting results. Based on our finding that long duration of MDS prior to DAC treatment may be a novel factor linked to a better outcome (1), we now assess its value in the phase III trial 06011 (DAC versus BSC [3]). Immediate enrolment after diagnosis was allowed in that trial, median MDS duration prior to randomization thus only 3 months (mths). Methods: Comparison of progression-free (PFS), AML-free (AMLFS) and overall survival (OS) according to MDS duration >= vs. <3 mths in 233 patients (pts) with higher-risk MDS (median age 70 years) randomized to DAC (n=119) or BSC (n=114). Comparisons by long-rank test and multivariate analyses by Cox regression (Performance Status [PS], cytogenetics and IPSS high risk N/Y) were performed retrospectively: MDS duration had not yet been known as possible stratification factor at time of study initiation, and the trial thus not been powered to detect significant differences with regard to this discriminator. Results: A better prognosis of patients with MDS duration >=3 vs <3 mths was observed in DAC arm (B vs A) and BSC arm (D vs C). Conversely, DAC yielded better results than BSC in each MDS duration group: <3 mths (A vs C) and >=3 mths (B vs D). In both arms (n=233), Mult. indicated that MDS duration (>=3 vs <3 mths) adjusted for treatment, PS, cytogenetics and IPSS group was an independent prognostic factor regarding PFS (HR=0.75, 95%CI 0.58–0.99), AMLFS (HR=0.68, 95%CI 0.51–0.90), and OS (HR=0.75, 95%CI 0.56–0.99). The tests for interaction treatment × duration of MDS were not significant for 3 endpoints: PFS (p=0.38), AMLFS (p=0.90), OS (p=0.67). Conclusion: In intermediate-2 and high-risk MDS pts, long duration from MDS diagnosis to start of DAC or BSC appeared to be associated with a better outcome. This finding is in sharp contrast to the adverse prognostic impact of antecedent disease duration in patients who received intensive chemotherapy (4). It is supported by a similar analysis of pts with AML from MDS treated on the 00331 DAC phase II multicenter trial: those with longer MDS duration prior to DAC also had better outcome (5). Application of this discriminator in the evaluation also of other DAC schedules and MDS treatments therefore appears warranted. References: 1. Wijermans et al., Ann. Hematol. 84 (suppl. 1): 9–14, 2005 2. Kantarjian et al., Cancer 109:265-73, 2007 3. Wijermans et al., Blood 112 (suppl. 1): abs. 226, 2008 4. Estey et al., Blood 90:2969-77, 1997 5. Lübbert, Schmoor et al., abstract submitted, ASH 2010 Disclosures: Platzbecker: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Salih:Pfizer: Research Funding. Muus:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document