The relationship between response and dose in published, contemporary phase 1 oncology trials.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14583-e14583
Author(s):  
Antonious Ziad Hazim ◽  
Emerson Yu-sheng Chen ◽  
Gordon B. Mills ◽  
Vinay Prasad
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Drug Dose ◽  
Phase I Trials ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
The Relationship

e14583 Background: Traditional dose-escalation trial designs have changed little even as diverse classes of oncology drugs have been developed. We aimed to examine whether the association of drug dose to preliminary clinical efficacy previously established in cytotoxic chemotherapies remains true in contemporary phase I dose-escalation oncology trials. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of recent early-phase, dose-finding clinical trials of oncology drugs from November 15, 2015 to November 15, 2018 to examine the relationship between the dose of the investigational drug and objective response rate. We searched PubMed using “cancer” or “oncology” search terms and selected studies that enrolled adults with advanced cancer, determined maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose, and reported efficacy results by drug dose level. Trials testing combination therapies, single dose level, and non-pharmacologic therapies were excluded. Information related to the study drug, study design, cancer type, dose levels, MTD, and recommended phase II dose were all collected. Treatment response for every dose level was categorized into: complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease. Dose level was categorized into four categories: < = 40%, 41-80%, 81-120%, and > 120% of the recommended phase II dose. Results: We identified 93 trials with 2506 participants having both dose and treatment response data. Of these trials, 71 (76%) were testing targeted agents, 7 (8%) were immunotherapy, and 6 (7%) were cytotoxic chemotherapy. Median response rate across trials was 5% (range 0-83%). Among the dose range of < = 40%, the response rate was 12% (57 of 491), 41-80% was 17% (95 of 562), 81-120% was 23% (272 of 1206), and > 120% was 29% (71 of 247). Conclusions: Observed treatment response across dose levels in recent phase I trials should cause us to re-examine the toxicity-benefit ratio and influence how we design phase I trials testing novel classes of oncology drugs.

Phase I study of temsirolimus (CCI-779), carboplatin, and paclitaxel in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors: NCIC CTG IND 179

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3558-3558
Author(s):  
A. M. Oza ◽  
C. Kollmannsberger ◽  
H. Hirte ◽  
S. Welch ◽  
L. Siu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Solid Malignancies ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Further Development ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

3558 Background: Temsirolimus (T) has encouraging activity in many malignancies, including endometrial cancer and a combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel would logical regimen for further development. This trial was designed to assess the safety and tolerability of this combination and expand experience at the recommended dose in pts with endometrial and ovarian cancers. Methods: A 3+3 dose escalation Phase I study has been conducted in pts with advanced solid malignancies suitable for carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy who had not received more than 2 prior lines of chemotherapy. To date, 31 eligible pts with a median age of 59 have been treated and 27 are evaluable for toxicity. Pts were entered in 6 dose levels, with the first two levels administering T on Days 8 and 15 and the next 4 levels switching to a D1, 8 administration. Eighteen had received prior chemotherapy and 15 prior radiation. Results: Day 8, 15 administration of T was not feasible due to myelosuppression on day 15. The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel on day 1 with T on D1 and 8 has been well tolerated, and patients have received a median of 5 cycles of therapy. At dose level 6 (T 25 mg D1 and 8, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 D1, carboplatin AUC 6 D1) dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen in one of 6 pts treated to date (Gr 4 thrombocytopenia) and a second pt had a possible DLT ( Gr 3 fatigue in presence of baseline fatigue). This dose level is being expanded in 4 endometrial and ovarian cancer pts. The regimen is active: of the 26 patients with follow-up data, there have been 10 with partial response (38.5%; med. duration 7.1 mo [1.0–12.7]) and 12 with stable disease (46%; med. duration 6.9 mo [1.3- 7.8]). One patient had progressive disease and three were inevaluable. Conclusions: The results indicate this combination is well tolerated and requires additional assessment in a Phase II setting. The recommended Phase II dose will be dose level 6 provided no further DLTs are observed in the additional 4 patients entered. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Relationship Between Response and Dose in Published, Contemporary Phase I Oncology Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 428-433
Author(s):  
Antonious Hazim ◽  
Gordon Mills ◽  
Vinay Prasad ◽  
Alyson Haslam ◽  
Emerson Y. Chen
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Dose Range ◽  
Drug Dose ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Drug Study ◽  
Median Response ◽  
Median Response Rate ◽  
The Relationship

Background: As progress continues in oncology drug development, this study aimed to examine whether the previously established association between drug dose and efficacy in the era of cytotoxic therapies remains true in today’s phase I dose-escalation oncology trials. Methods: A systematic review of early-phase dose-finding trials of single-agent oncology drugs from 2015 to 2018 was conducted to examine the relationship between drug dose and objective responses. Cancer-specific trials were included if they determined maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Data related to the study drug, study design, treatment response, cancer type, dose levels, MTD, and RP2D were all collected. Dose level was categorized into 4 categories (≤40%, 41%–80%, 81%–120%, and >120% of the RP2D) and was further analyzed by class of drug. Results: A total of 175 phase I studies were identified, with a total of 7,330 patients showing a median response rate of 5% (range, 0%–83%) across trials. A total of 93 trials with 2,506 participants had response data corresponding to drug dose level. In this subset, the median response rate was 5% (range, 0%–83%) across trials. Across all participants in this subset, the response rate was 12% (57 of 491) among those in the dose range of ≤40% of RP2D, 17% (95 of 562) among those in 41% to 80% of RP2D, 23% (272 of 1,206) among those in 81% to 120% of RP2D, and 29% (71 of 247) among those in >120% of RP2D (P<.001). The response rate at ≤40% of RP2D for targeted antibody was 5%, 4% for cellular therapy, 19% for immunotherapy, and 21% for small-molecule targeted inhibitors. Conclusions: Whereas our study of published phase I trials continued to show a low response rate consistent with earlier studies, the relationship between response and dose does not always peak at 81% to 120% of RP2D anymore, likely due to the use of novel immunotherapy and targeted agents with distinct efficacy and toxicity patterns.

Phase I trial of subcutaneous interleukin-6 in patients with advanced malignancies.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 499-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Weber ◽  
J C Yang ◽  
S L Topalian ◽  
D R Parkinson ◽  
D S Schwartzentruber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interleukin 6 ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Organ Toxicity ◽  
Advanced Malignancies ◽  
Major Organ ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Grade Iii

PURPOSE Based on preclinical evidence in murine models that interleukin-6 (IL-6) mediates regression of metastatic tumors, we performed a phase I study of recombinant human IL-6 in patients with refractory advanced malignancies to determine its pharmacokinetics, toxicities, and possible immunologic and antitumor effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS Recombinant IL-6 was administered as a single subcutaneous dose daily for 7 days, with 7 days off therapy followed by another 7 days of IL-6. Doses were escalated in cohorts of three patients starting at 3 micrograms/kg/d, provided that toxicity at the preceding dose level was not dose-limiting. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade III or IV major organ toxicity that did not resolve to grade II or less in 24 hours after stopping IL-6, using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Patients were treated with 3, 10, and 30 micrograms/kg/d IL-6 subcutaneously. RESULTS Three patients each were treated at the 3- and 10-micrograms dose levels. Two of five patients treated with 30 micrograms/kg/d IL-6 subcutaneously had grade III major organ toxicity that required IL-6 therapy to be discontinued. All patients experienced fever, chills, and minor fatigue. Significant increases in C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, platelet counts, and lymphocyte IL-2 receptor levels were seen in patients at the 10- and 30-micrograms/kg dose levels. Decreases in albumin and hemoglobin were observed, particularly at the 30-micrograms/kg dose level. The half-life (T1/2 beta) was 4.2 hours, with a peak IL-6 level at 5 hours. No antitumor responses were seen. CONCLUSION A safely tolerated dose of daily subcutaneous IL-6 is 10 micrograms/kg, with hepatotoxicity and cardiac arrhythmia being the dose-limiting toxicities at 30 micrograms/kg. Phase II trials of IL-6 administered subcutaneously daily for at least 7 days for two cycles with an intervening week of rest are recommended for phase II trials. However, patients with extensive replacement of liver by tumor and abnormal liver functions should receive IL-6 therapy with caution.

Fludarabine-Based Conditioning for Allogeneic Marrow Transplantation From Unrelated Donors in Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA): Serious and Unexpected Adverse Events in Pre-Defined Cyclophosphamide (CY) Dose Levels

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3009-3009
Author(s):  
Jakub Tolar ◽  
H. Joachim Deeg ◽  
Sally Arai ◽  
Mitchell Horwitz ◽  
Joseph H. Antin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Marrow Transplantation ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
The Other ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 3009FN2 Objective: To determine toxicity and efficacy of adding fludarabine (FLU) to a regimen of total body irradiation (TBI), anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclophosphamide (CY), with de-escalation of the CY dose. The goal is to minimize CY-related toxicities while preserving (or improving) engraftment and survival in patients with SAA receiving an unrelated donor marrow transplant. Patients and Methods: Since May 2006, the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN), sponsored by the NHLBI and NCI, has conducted a prospective Phase I/II clinical trial of unrelated donor marrow transplantation in SAA (BMT CTN 0301). Patients with SAA are eligible if they are < 65 years, have adequate organ function, and have an available unrelated marrow donor matched 7 of 8 HLA-A, B, C, DRB1 loci. Patients with Fanconi anemia and other marrow failure syndromes are excluded. All patients receive TBI 200 cGy, ATG (either thymoglobulin: 3 mg/kg IV or ATGAM 30 mg/kg IV daily × 3, days –4 to –2), FLU (30 mg/m2 IV daily × 4, days –5 to –2). The Phase I portion of the trial sequentially tested four CY dose levels: 150 mg/kg (administered days –4 to –2); 100 mg/kg (days –3 to –2); 50 mg/kg (day –2); and, 0 mg/kg, and allowed enrollment of up to six patients at each CY dose level unless toxicity or graft failure boundaries were crossed. In the Phase II portion of the trial, patients enroll onto the optimal CY dose level, which is chosen using adaptive Bayesian criteria to rank desirability of the CY doses. All patients are followed for two years after transplantation. Early stopping guidelines are used to monitor for graft failure and early transplant-related mortality through day 100. Results: Twenty-one patients accrued to the Phase I portion of the trial. CY dose level 0 mg/kg was closed after all three enrolled patients developed secondary graft failure. All received a second allograft. One patient remains alive at 23 months after the first transplantation. The other two died from adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) at 114 days after the first transplant and idiopathic pneumonia at 200 days after the first transplant. Review of Phase I results for the other three dose levels suggested CY dose 150 mg/kg as the optimal dose level for Phase II testing. However, after an additional eight patients were treated at this dose, the level was closed to further accrual because of excess toxicity. Seven of the 14 patients receiving 150 mg/kg of CY (and 7 of the last 8 enrolled) died. Causes of death were cardiac/pulmonary/multi-organ failure (n=4), ARDS (n=2), and parainfluenza virus type 3 pneumonia (n=1). Bayesian evaluation of the two remaining dose levels indicates very similar desirability scores and accrual continues at both the CY 100 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg levels. As of July 15, 2011, a total of 61 patients have been enrolled, 17 on the two closed levels, 33 on the 100 mg/kg level and 11 on the 50 mg/kg level. Conclusions: Early analysis of this trial, made necessary by these unexpected severe adverse events, revealed two important findings among patients receiving low-dose TBI, ATG, and FLU at the doses outlined: 1) CY dose 0 mg/kg is associated with higher than expected graft failure; and, 2) CY dose 150 mg/kg is associated with excess transplant-related toxicity. Neither CY dose level should be tested further in the context of the regimen used in this trial. To date, the two intermediate CY dose levels (100 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg) have not crossed the graft failure or fatality stopping boundaries and accrual is in progress. Disclosures: Pulsipher: Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

The Combination of Quizartinib with Azacitidine or Low Dose Cytarabine Is Highly Active in Patients (Pts) with FLT3-ITD Mutated Myeloid Leukemias: Interim Report of a Phase I/II Trial

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 388-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Flt3 Inhibitor ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Low Dose Cytarabine

Abstract Background: FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with early relapse and poor survival. Quizartinib potently and selectively inhibits FLT3 kinase activity. In a phase I and II studies the composite response rate (CRR) was approximately 50% among patients with FLT3-ITD. There is in-vitro synergy between quizartinib and 5-AZA or LDAC. We hypothesize that adding quizartinib to a hypomethylating agent such as 5-azacitidine (AZA) or cytarabine may improve the response rate expected from the use of either agent alone. Objectives: The primary objective of phase I part is to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of quizartinib (AC220) with either AZA or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC); for phase II is to determine the clinical activity of both combinations. This planned interim analysis reports on the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and first futility analysis. Methods: For phase I, patients with relapsed/refractory high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) or AML were eligible irrespective of FLT3 mutation and salvage status. For phase II, presence of FLT3-ITD is a requisite. Phase II enrollment is limited to patients >60 years with untreated MDS/CMML/AML, or any age receiving first salvage treatment. Additional eligibilities include performance status ECOG ≤2, adequate organ function, normal electrolytes (potassium, calcium and magnesium). Important exclusions include QTcF> 450 mSec, concomitant drugs that prolong QT/QTc interval or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers with the exception of antibiotics, antifungals, and antivirals that are used as standard of care. Treatment cycle is defined as 28 days. Treatment comprises of AZA 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously (SQ) or intravenously (IV) for 7 days of every cycle (Days 1-7), or cytarabine 20 mg SQ twice daily for 10 days of every cycle (Days 1-10) along with quizartinib at two planned dose levels: 60 mg (dose level 1) or 90 mg orally daily (dose level 2) uninterrupted. Patients are assigned to AZA or LDAC arm by physician choice or slot availability. Planned accrual for each arm in phase 2 is 26 pts each and an ORR of ≥50% will be considered favorable. Accrual of 26 pts will give a 95% credible interval for overall response rate of (0.32, 0.68). The study will be stopped for toxicity (>30%) and/or futility (ORR <50%) at interim analysis for each arm. Results: Twenty-six (Phase I=12, phase II=14) pts have been enrolled: 18 to AZA arm and 8 to LDAC arm. Median age is 62 years (range, 25-79 years), 7 (27%) are female. Cytogenetics are diploid=14, +8=2, -7=2, miscellaneous=6, 11q and t(8;21)= 1 each. Median number of prior therapies is 2 (range, 0-7), 7 patients received prior FLT3 inhibitor. For both schedules quizartinib 60 mg daily was identified as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) based on emerging results from separate dose-finding study. Eighteen [5 in LDAC arm (63%) and 13 (72%) in AZA arm; all with FLT3-ITD mutation without D835 mutation] of 26 total pts (69%) have responded (CR=1/ CRp=3/ CRi=2/ MLFS=10/PR=1/HI=1). Among patients with FLT3-ITD (N=22), ORR is 82%. Four of 7 (57%) patients with prior FLT3 inhibitor exposure responded. Median number of days to respond is 57 days (range, 25-102 days). Among responders two patients died (MLFS=1, PR=1): one with gastro-intestinal bleeding and other with progressive pneumonia. Three additional responders have discontinued therapy for stem cell transplant (1), withdrawal of consent (1), and loss of response with emergence of D835 mutation (1). Nine responders (CR=1, CRi=1, CRp=1, PR=1, MLS=5) had >50% reduction of FLT3-ITD allelic burden and 2 additional pts (CR=1, CRi=1) had no detectable FLT3-ITD at response. Number of pts with treatment emergent grade 3/4 toxicities irrespective of attribution include hypokalemia (15), hypophosphatemia (5), hyponatremia (4), hypocalcemia (4), hyperbilirubinemia (3), increase in ALT (1), hypernatremia (1hyperglycemia (1), hypotension (1), QTcF prolongation (1, grade 3). Conclusion: Combination of quizartinib and AZA or LDAC is highly active among patients with AML/MDS/CMML with FLT3-ITD . Response rates appear higher than expected with either agent alone. Clinically significant QTcF prolongation is infrequent. Accrual to both arms of the current trial continues. Disclosures Cortes: Ambit Biosciences: Research Funding.

The Combination of Quizartinib with Azacitidine or Low Dose Cytarabine Is Highly Active in Patients (Pts) with FLT3-ITD Mutated Myeloid Leukemias: Interim Report of a Phase I/II Trial

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1642-1642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waleed Abdelall ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Keyur P. Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Flt3 Inhibitor ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Low Dose Cytarabine

Abstract Background: FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with early relapse and poor survival. Quizartinib inhibits FLT3 kinase activity potently and selectively. In phase I and II studies, the composite response rate (CRR) was approximately 50% among patients with FLT3-ITD. There is in-vitro synergy between quizartinib and 5-AZA or LDAC. We hypothesize that adding quizartinib to a hypomethylating agent- such as 5-azacitidine (AZA) -or to cytarabine may improve the response rate expected from the use of either agent alone. Objectives: The primary objective of phase I is to determine dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of combination of quizartinib with either AZA or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC); for phase II is to determine the clinical activity of both combinations. This planned interim analysis reports on the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and first futility analysis. Methods: For phase I, pts with relapsed/refractory high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) or AML were eligible irrespective of FLT3 mutation and salvage status. For phase II: presence of FLT3-ITD is a requisite, pts must be >60 years with untreated MDS/CMML/AML or any age receiving first salvage treatment. Other requisites: performance status ECOG ≤2, adequate organ function and normal electrolytes (potassium, calcium and magnesium). Important exclusions include: QTcF> 450 msec, administration of drugs that prolong QT/QTc interval or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers; with the exception of antibiotics, antifungals, and antivirals that are used as standard of care. Treatment cycle is 28 days and comprises of AZA 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously (SQ) or intravenously (IV) for 7 days of every cycle, or cytarabine 20 mg SQ twice daily for 10 days of every cycle along with quizartinib at two planned dose levels: 60 mg (dose level 1) or 90 mg orally daily (dose level 2), uninterrupted. Patients are assigned to AZA or LDAC arm by physician choice or slot availability. Planned accrual for each arm in phase II is 26 pts each and an ORR of ≥50% will be considered favorable. Accrual of 26 pts will give a 95% credible interval for ORR of (0.32, 0.68). The study will be stopped for toxicity (>30%) and/or futility (ORR <50%) at interim analysis for each arm. Results: Fifty-two (Phase I=12, phase II=40) pts have been enrolled: 38 to AZA arm and 14 to LDAC arm. Median age is 67 years (range, 23-83 years), 24 (46%) are female. Cytogenetics are diploid=24, +8=5, monosomy 7=3, miscellaneous=17, 11q=2 and t(8;21)= 1. Median number of prior therapies is 1 (range, 0-7); 7 patients had received prior FLT3 inhibitor: sorafenib (5), crenolanib (1), quizartinib (1). For both combinations quizartinib 60 mg daily was identified as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Thirty-five Pts [8 in LDAC arm (23%) and 27 in AZA arm (77%)] of total 52 have responded with ORR 67 % (CR=8, CRp=7, CRi=18, PR=2); all with FLT3-ITD mutation without D835 mutation. ORR is 73% among pts with FLT3-ITD (N=48). Three of eight pts (38%) with prior FLT3 inhibitor exposure responded. Median time to response is 35 days (range, 14-187days). Among responders, two pts died (in CRi=1, PR=1): one with GI bleed and one with progressive pneumonia. Twelve responders discontinued therapy: 11 to receive a SCT and 1 due to loss of response with emergence of D835 mutation. Fifteen responders (CR=2, CRi=8, CRp=3, PR=2) had >50% reduction of FLT3-ITD allelic burden and eight additional pts (CR=5, CRi=1, CRp=2) had no detectable FLT3-ITD at response. The median survival was: 14.8 mo for the total study group: 7.5 mo for LDAC arm and not reached for AZA arm; median EFS has not been reached for either arm (Figure). Treatment emergent grade 3/4 toxicities irrespective of attribution include hypokalemia (15), hypotension (7), hypophosphatemia (7), hyponatremia (7), hypocalcemia (7), hyperbilirubinemia (1), elevated ALT (5), hypernatremia (2) hyperglycemia (1), QTcF prolongation (1, grade 3). Conclusion: Combination of quizartinib and AZA or LDAC is highly active among patients with AML/MDS/CMML with FLT3-ITD mutation in absence of D835 mutation. Response rates appear higher than expected with either agent alone. Clinically significant QTcF prolongation is infrequent. Accrual to the study continues. Figure Figure. Disclosures Jabbour: ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Konopleva:Calithera: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding. Cortes:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding.

Pharmacodynamic-guided, modified continuous reassessment method (mCRM)-based, dose finding study of rapamycin in adult patients with solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3020-3020 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Jimeno ◽  
P. Kulesza ◽  
G. Cusatis ◽  
A. Howard ◽  
Y. Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Phase I Trials ◽  
Dose Selection ◽  
Normal Tissues ◽  
Tumor Biopsies ◽  
Dose Levels

3020 Background: Pharmacodynamic (PD) studies, using either surrogate or tumor tissues, are frequently incorporated in Phase I trials. However, it has been less common to base dose selection, the primary endpoint in Phase I trials, in PD effects. We conducted a PD-based dose selection study with rapamycin (Rap). Methods: We used the modified continuous reassessment method (mCRM), a computer-based dose escalation algorithm, and adapted the logit function from its classic toxicity-based input data to a PD-based input. We coupled this design to a Phase I trial of Rap with 2 parts: a dose estimation phase where PD endpoints are measured in normal tissues and a confirmation phase where tumor tissue is assessed. Patients (pts) had solid tumors refractory to standard therapy. Rap was given starting at 2 mg/day continuously in 3-pt cohorts. The PD endpoint was pP70S6K in skin and tumor. Biopsies were done on days 0 and 28 of cycle 1, and a PD effect was defined as ≥ 80% inhibition from baseline. The first 2 dose levels (2 and 3 mgs) were evaluated before implementing the mCRM. The data was then fed to the computer that based on the PD effect calculated the next dose level. The mCRM was set so escalation continued until a dose level elicited a PD effect and the mCRM assigned the same dose to 8 consecutive pts, at which point the effect of that dose will be confirmed in tumor biopsies. Other correlates were PET-CT and pharmacokinetics. Results: Ten pts were enrolled at doses of 2 mg (n = 4), 3 mg (n = 3) and 6 mg (n = 3). Toxicity was anemia (4 G1, 1 G2), leucopenia (1 G1, 2 G2), low ANC (2 G2), hyperglycemia (2 G1, 1 G2), hyperlipidemia (4 G1), and mucositis (1 G1, 1 G2). PD responses were seen in 2 and 1 pt at 2 and 3 mg dose levels. Input of data to the mCRM selected a dose of 6 mg for the third cohort, where PD effect was seen in 1 pt, and thus a fourth dose around 9 mg will be tested. No responses by RECIST occurred, but 2 pts had a response by PET. The PK was consistent with prior data (t1/2 24.6 ± 10.2 h, CL 31.4 ± 12.0 L/h, vol of distribution 235 ± 65 L), and exposure increased with dose. Steady-state concentration were in the 5–20 nM range. Conclusions: mCRM-based dose escalation based on real-time PD assessment is feasible and permits the exploitation of PD effects for dose selection in a rational manner. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I trial of ABT-751 and carboplatin (C) in patients (pts) with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17098-17098 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. H. Dragnev ◽  
J. R. Rigas ◽  
W. M. Disalvo ◽  
S. A. Simeone ◽  
A. E. Hagey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Xenograft Model ◽  
The United States ◽  
Buccal Swabs ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Dose Levels

17098 Background: NSCLC is the leading cause of cancer mortality for men and women in the United States. More effective treatments are needed to prolong survival and improve quality of life. Platin-containing chemotherapy doublets are commonly used in NSCLC treatment. ABT-751 is a novel oral anti-microtubule agent targeting the colchicine binding site. As single agent, it was well-tolerated and showed a preliminary signal of activity in previously treated NSCLC. In vivo studies demonstrated additive activity between ABT-751 and cisplatin in a NSCLC xenograft model. Methods: A phase I trial of ABT-751 and C was conducted in pts with advanced previously treated NSCLC. Primary objective - maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives - toxicities, efficacy, and surrogate markers of response (cell cycle changes and cyclin D1 expression) in buccal swabs from pts at the phase II dose. Six dose levels - 1: ABT-751 100mg bid, C AUC 4.5; 2: ABT-751 125 mg bid, C AUC 4.5; 3: ABT-751 125 mg bid, C AUC 6; 4: ABT-751 150 mg bid, C AUC 6; 5: ABT-751 175 mg bid, C AUC 6; 6: ABT-751 200 mg bid, C AUC 6. ABT-751 was taken orally twice a day for 14 days in a 21 day cycle, C was administered intravenously on day 4 during cycle 1 and on day 1 on subsequent cycles. Rapid dose escalation was used for the first 3 dose levels followed by cohorts of at least 3 patients for the remaining dose levels. Results: Eight pts were enrolled, all stage IV NSCLC, 4 women, median age 62 (47–73), all KPS 80, 6 had one and 2 had 2 prior therapies. A median of 3.5 (1–4) cycles was administered. Dose-limiting toxiticies of grade 3 fatigue and grade 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were observed in 2/5 patients on dose level 4. Common grade 2 toxicites were constipation and peripheral sensory neuropathy (levels 2–4). MTD was dose level 3. Seven pts were evaluable for response, 2 had partial responses (levels 2 and 4, both had one prior therapy), 4 had stable disease, 1 had disease progression. Median time to progression was 18.7 weeks (6–24+). Pharmacokinetic analyses and buccal swabs are being performed. Conclusions: The recommended phase II doses are ABT-751 125 mg twice daily for 14 days and carboplatin AUC 6 on a 21-day cycle. This regimen is well tolerated and shows preliminary evidence of activity for previously treated NSCLC. [Table: see text]

Phase I study of weekly intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with S-1 and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 146-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironori Ishigami ◽  
Shoichi Kaisaki ◽  
Hironori Yamaguchi ◽  
Hiroharu Yamashita ◽  
Shigenobu Emoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Peritoneal Metastasis ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

146 Background: Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy is a promising treatment option for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. We previously verified the safety and efficacy of IP paclitaxel (PTX) combined with S-1 and intravenous PTX in phase I and phase II studies. S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) demonstrated efficacy in a phase II study, and is regarded as a candidate for the next-generation standard regimen for gastric cancer. We designed a new regimen combining weekly IP PTX with SOX in order to maximize systemic effects as well as local effects in the peritoneal cavity. A dose-escalation study of IP PTX in combination with fixed doses of SOX was carried out to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD). Methods: PTX was administered intraperitoneally on days 1 and 8 with an initial dose of 20 mg/m2 (level 1), stepped up to 30 mg/m2 (level 2) or 40 mg/m2 (level 3) depending on observed toxicity. S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 80 mg/m2/day (b.i.d.) for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest. Oxaliplatin was administered intravenously at a dose of 100 mg/m2 on day 1. This treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Toxicity was graded according to CTCAE v4.0. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as grade 4 leukopenia, grade 3 febrile neutropenia, grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 non-hematological toxicity. The MTD was defined as the dose level at which 2 or more of 3 or 6 patients developed DLTs during two courses of treatment. The RD was defined as one dose level under the MTD. Results: A total of 12 gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis were enrolled. No DLTs were observed at all dose levels. Neutropenia in one patient at dose level 3 was the only grade 3 toxicity observed. Grade 2/3 leukopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed only in 2 patients at dose level 3. Regarding grade 2 non-hematological toxicities, anorexia, fatigue and nausea were observed in 6, 4 and 2 patients, respectively, independent of dose levels. Consequently, the MTD was not reached, and the RD of IP PTX was determined to be 40 mg/m2 (level 3). Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy of IP PTX with SOX was shown to be a safe regimen that should be further explored in clinical trials.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of the Oral Farnesyltransferase Inhibitor Lonafarnib Administered Twice Daily to Pediatric Patients With Advanced Central Nervous System Tumors Using a Modified Continuous Reassessment Method: A Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium Study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (21) ◽  
pp. 3137-3143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark W. Kieran ◽  
Roger J. Packer ◽  
Arzu Onar ◽  
Susan M. Blaney ◽  
Peter Phillips ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Pediatric Brain Tumor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Farnesyltransferase Inhibitor ◽  
Continual Reassessment ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Dose Levels

Purpose A dose-escalation phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor lonafarnib ( SCH66336 ) was conducted in children with recurrent or progressive CNS tumors. Primary objectives were to estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and to describe the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and pharmacokinetics of lonafarnib. Farnesylation inhibition of HDJ-2 in peripheral blood was also measured. Patients and Methods Lonafarnib was administered orally twice daily at dose levels of 70, 90, 115, 150, and 200 mg/m2/dose bid. A modified continual reassessment method (CRM) was used to estimate the MTD based on actual dosages of lonafarnib administered and toxicities observed during the initial 4 weeks of treatment. Results Fifty-three children with progressive or recurrent brain tumors were enrolled, with a median age of 12.2 years (range, 3.9 to 19.5 years). Dose-limiting pneumonitis or myelosuppression was observed in three of three patients at the 200 mg/m2/dose level. A relatively constant DLT rate at the 70, 90, and 115 mg/m2/dose levels resulted in a recommended phase II dose of 115 mg/m2/dose. Significant diarrhea did not occur with prophylactic loperamide. Both radiographic response (one anaplastic astrocytoma) and stable disease (one medulloblastoma, two high-grade and four low-grade gliomas, one ependymoma, and one sarcoma) were noted, and seven patients remained on treatment for 1 year or longer. Conclusion Although the estimated MTD by the CRM model was 98.5 mg/m2/dose, because of the relatively constant observed DLT rate at the lower four dose levels, the recommended phase II dose of lonafarnib is 115 mg/m2/dose administered twice daily by mouth with concurrent loperamide.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document